This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2913* 21 35 31.23 -19 23 25.8 11.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7912,11.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2912 11.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2913* 21 35 31.14 -19 23 25.0 11.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7912,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2912 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2912 2461242.7912 13.05 21:05:23.58 -18:40:57.4
29.54594 -37.68061 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla 0 0 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:05:23.58 -18:40:57.4: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:05:23.58 -18:40:57.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2913* 21 05 23.58 -18 40 57.4 13.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7912,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2912 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2912 2461242.7912 13.45 21:40:28.15 -14:32:25.5
38.77931 -43.93165 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.653 Berenike -2 -2 3 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:40:28.15 -14:32:25.5: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:40:28.15 -14:32:25.5: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2913* 21 40 28.15 -14 32 25.5 13.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7912,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2912 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2912 2461242.7912 13.87 21:07:08.93 -16:16:32.3
32.56359 -37.20223 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.569 Misa -0 -1 1 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:08.93 -16:16:32.3: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:08.93 -16:16:32.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.2913* 21 07 08.93 -16 16 32.3 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7912,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2912 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2912 2461242.7912 14.19 21:13:02.09 -14:14:34.2
35.61700 -37.72580 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1860 Barbarossa -0 -1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:13:02.09 -14:14:34.2: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:13:02.09 -14:14:34.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7912,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2912 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461242.79155865 21.07.2026 06:59:40.667 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7279
Objects passed selection criteria: 7275
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6856
Average stars matched: 6608 (96.3827 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116028 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 02:01:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461242.79155865 21.07.2026 06:59:40.667 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 45389
Objects passed selection criteria: 45279
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41283.5
Average stars matched: 39900 (96.6488 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 149308 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 02:05:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.79093811
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:44.299 -18:02:33.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:44.299 -18:02:33.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0798 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:41.460 -18:03:11.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:41.460 -18:03:11.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0953 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:44.299 -18:02:33.00
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:41.460 -18:03:11.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01560 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5uIp46mZ46
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rp4ryVM6zg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0EvAuBxAE6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k5jgvHeTxO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.585450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.585450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Loaded 6814 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5032 out of 5155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5155 out of 7087 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5uIp46mZ46 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=463, bad_region=0, passed=7063
Got 7063 stars (including 6589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=253 n_q2=249 n_q3=224 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Rp4ryVM6zg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=456, bad_region=0, passed=7087
Got 7087 stars (including 6625 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=247 n_q2=246 n_q3=232 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0EvAuBxAE6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, bad_region=0, passed=6736
Got 6736 stars (including 6404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6736 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.212 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.241 n_q1=274 n_q2=202 n_q3=269 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.k5jgvHeTxO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=335, bad_region=0, passed=6745
Got 6745 stars (including 6402 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6745 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=272 n_q2=207 n_q3=270 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.125
new1=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits sigma_overall=0.278 worst_q_ratio=1.207
new2=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits sigma_overall=0.264 worst_q_ratio=1.299
reference average sigma_overall=0.4225 worst_q_ratio=1.159
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:19:33.95 -17:16:50.5: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:15:02.81 -18:42:45.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:22.75 -17:02:34.0: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:48:16.37 -18:13:11.9: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:09:51.53 -19:07:04.3: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:15:30.98 -17:03:21.8: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:20:49.64 -18:56:41.5: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:50.46 -17:07:16.3: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:19:33.95 -17:16:50.5: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:15:02.81 -18:42:45.9: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:19:33.95 -17:16:50.5: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7983 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:02.81 -18:42:45.9: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7929 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:22.75 -17:02:34.0: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:09:51.53 -19:07:04.3: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:22.75 -17:02:34.0: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7242 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:51.53 -19:07:04.3: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7566 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:20:49.64 -18:56:41.5: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:48:16.37 -18:13:11.9: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:49.64 -18:56:41.5: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7310 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:16.37 -18:13:11.9: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6551 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:50.46 -17:07:16.3: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:50.46 -17:07:16.3: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6388 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:15:30.98 -17:03:21.8: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:30.98 -17:03:21.8: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7291 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:13:28.43 -19:19:49.0: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:12:52.32 -18:32:42.9: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:13:28.43 -19:19:49.0: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:28.43 -19:19:49.0: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7995 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:00.02 -13:05:46.2: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:17:57.30 -18:11:15.0: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:49:33.50 -12:50:00.8: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:00.02 -13:05:46.2: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:12:52.32 -18:32:42.9: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:00.02 -13:05:46.2: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8551 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:17:57.30 -18:11:15.0: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:57.30 -18:11:15.0: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8059 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:52.32 -18:32:42.9: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7729 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:49:33.50 -12:50:00.8: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:33.50 -12:50:00.8: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7814 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20423_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20486_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20486_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:37.52 -16:10:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20552_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 20552_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20600_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20600_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20611_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20611_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20612_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20612_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20616_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20616_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20622_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20622_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20627_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20627_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20633_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20635_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20635_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20639_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20639_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20642_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 20642_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:44.299 -18:02:33.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:44.299 -18:02:33.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0798 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:41.460 -18:03:11.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:41.460 -18:03:11.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0953 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:44.299 -18:02:33.00
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:41.460 -18:03:11.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01560 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wAwBVgUHbP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y1U8PZ3POs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PV39rWjdnk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lDHnkAQj7y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5427 out of 5892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5892 out of 47842 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.440700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.440700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 47842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5427 out of 5892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5892 out of 47842 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 47137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4995 deg, Dec -23.2703 to -12.6356 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4995 deg, Dec -23.2703 to -12.6356 deg
Loaded 6856 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5425 out of 5895 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5895 out of 47137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wAwBVgUHbP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=2135, bad_region=0, passed=47822
Got 47822 stars (including 45631 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=257 n_q2=241 n_q3=222 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y1U8PZ3POs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2107, bad_region=1, passed=47119
Got 47119 stars (including 44945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47119 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=255 n_q2=241 n_q3=219 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PV39rWjdnk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1416, bad_region=1, passed=35779
Got 35779 stars (including 34320 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.216 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=268 n_q2=194 n_q3=276 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lDHnkAQj7y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1399, bad_region=3, passed=35702
Got 35702 stars (including 34268 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35702 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.219 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.201 n_q1=260 n_q2=198 n_q3=277 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-58-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0659.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_020020_TTUQ1b1x1_938726_Y1Wr5TFY/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:27:00.85 -21:16:16.1: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:22:18.92 -15:47:57.2: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:05.10 -12:43:45.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:09:25.89 -13:43:07.7: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:20:44.31 -15:02:48.3: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:42:55.40 -21:58:47.1: 13.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:58.73 -14:32:36.9: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:48:49.74 -17:34:33.8: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:08:49.14 -13:37:31.1: 14.31 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:50:41.41 -15:21:17.4: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:27:00.85 -21:16:16.1: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:20:44.31 -15:02:48.3: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:00.85 -21:16:16.1: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5635 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:44.31 -15:02:48.3: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6602 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:42:55.40 -21:58:47.1: 13.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:42:55.40 -21:58:47.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5201 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:48:49.74 -17:34:33.8: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:49.74 -17:34:33.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1456 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:22:18.92 -15:47:57.2: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:09:25.89 -13:43:07.7: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:05.10 -12:43:45.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:05.10 -12:43:45.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:18.92 -15:47:57.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2126 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:25.89 -13:43:07.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0166 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:58.73 -14:32:36.9: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:58.73 -14:32:36.9: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0595 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:08:49.14 -13:37:31.1: 14.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:49.14 -13:37:31.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3442 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:27.65 -16:51:16.8: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:50:41.41 -15:21:17.4: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:41.41 -15:21:17.4: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9045 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:05:23.58 -18:40:57.4: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:06:47.59 -20:11:08.6: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:44.27 -13:31:35.8: 13.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:53.90 -13:43:28.1: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:27.65 -16:51:16.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:27.65 -16:51:16.8: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4843 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:33:29.35 -13:26:52.6: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:49:54.19 -13:14:46.2: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:05:23.58 -18:40:57.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:39.80 -16:27:10.0: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:53.90 -13:43:28.1: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:06:47.59 -20:11:08.6: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:44.27 -13:31:35.8: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:47.59 -20:11:08.6: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8328 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:53.90 -13:43:28.1: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1507 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:44.27 -13:31:35.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1361 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:40:28.15 -14:32:25.5: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:39.80 -16:27:10.0: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:39.80 -16:27:10.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4069 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:33:29.35 -13:26:52.6: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:29.35 -13:26:52.6: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3028 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:49:54.19 -13:14:46.2: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:54.19 -13:14:46.2: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9435 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:40:28.15 -14:32:25.5: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:13:18.41 -13:41:04.7: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:29.74 -12:41:49.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:08:52.28 -13:20:09.7: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:42:35.12 -15:46:41.7: 13.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:29.74 -12:41:49.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:29.74 -12:41:49.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:13:18.41 -13:41:04.7: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:18.41 -13:41:04.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6056 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:08:52.28 -13:20:09.7: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:42:35.12 -15:46:41.7: 13.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:52.28 -13:20:09.7: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6885 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:42:35.12 -15:46:41.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4681 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:06.65 -13:20:14.6: 14.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:49:54.62 -16:56:29.5: 14.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:06.65 -13:20:14.6: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:06.65 -13:20:14.6: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8559 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:49:54.62 -16:56:29.5: 14.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:54.62 -16:56:29.5: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9102 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:56:00.25 -14:00:26.0: 13.80 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:14:45.44 -13:37:30.6: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:01.32 -12:43:22.4: 14.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:59:05.35 -13:03:30.6: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:49:52.43 -13:35:17.9: 14.77 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:49:25.36 -13:47:26.4: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:56:00.25 -14:00:26.0: 13.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:14:45.44 -13:37:30.6: 14.11 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:00.25 -14:00:26.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9485 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:45.44 -13:37:30.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9154 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:59:05.35 -13:03:30.6: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:05.35 -13:03:30.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0889 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:49:52.43 -13:35:17.9: 14.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:52.43 -13:35:17.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1745 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:50:44.75 -12:56:13.4: 14.83 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:01.32 -12:43:22.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:01.32 -12:43:22.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:49:25.36 -13:47:26.4: 14.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:25.36 -13:47:26.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9824 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:00:12.92 -13:55:02.3: 14.34 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:50:44.75 -12:56:13.4: 15.07 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:44.75 -12:56:13.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.1659 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:00:12.92 -13:55:02.3: 14.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:12.92 -13:55:02.3: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0493 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:08.93 -16:16:32.3: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:02:59.86 -12:45:39.1: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:43.37 -15:10:59.9: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:06:35.78 -12:54:52.4: 14.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:59:20.62 -14:22:40.3: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:50:04.21 -14:09:42.7: 14.61 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:08.93 -16:16:32.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:02:59.86 -12:45:39.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:59.86 -12:45:39.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:56.26 -13:02:43.0: 14.76 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:59:20.62 -14:22:40.3: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:43.37 -15:10:59.9: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:20.62 -14:22:40.3: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2256 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:43.37 -15:10:59.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2101 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:39.42 -13:28:47.3: 14.84 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:06:35.78 -12:54:52.4: 14.40 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:35.78 -12:54:52.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2029 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:56.26 -13:02:43.0: 14.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:50:04.21 -14:09:42.7: 14.45 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:04.21 -14:09:42.7: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1683 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:56.26 -13:02:43.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2379 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:39.42 -13:28:47.3: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:39.42 -13:28:47.3: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2804 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:54:20.65 -13:13:40.4: 14.58 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:59:13.97 -13:05:59.4: 14.59 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:19.53 -13:12:48.4: 14.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:54:33.25 -13:29:25.2: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:14.69 -12:53:20.3: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:51.63 -14:40:10.1: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:54:20.65 -13:13:40.4: 14.65 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:59:13.97 -13:05:59.4: 14.65 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:13.97 -13:05:59.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2254 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:20.65 -13:13:40.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1897 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:19.53 -13:12:48.4: 14.84 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:19.53 -13:12:48.4: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2057 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:14.12 -13:41:15.8: 14.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:54:33.25 -13:29:25.2: 14.94 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:14.69 -12:53:20.3: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:33.25 -13:29:25.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2862 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:14.69 -12:53:20.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1670 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:51.63 -14:40:10.1: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:14.12 -13:41:15.8: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:51.63 -14:40:10.1: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2329 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:14.12 -13:41:15.8: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1242 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:21.42 -13:12:10.0: 14.70 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:27.82 -13:02:18.1: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:03.63 -15:03:17.9: 14.64 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:50:14.18 -12:41:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:50.10 -12:57:41.4: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:27.82 -13:02:18.1: 14.63 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:50:35.72 -14:30:14.1: 14.31 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:27.82 -13:02:18.1: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.3547 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:02.63 -13:36:20.5: 15.17 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:28:49.90 -16:56:53.1: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:03.63 -15:03:17.9: 14.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:21.42 -13:12:10.0: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:03.63 -15:03:17.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2093 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:21.42 -13:12:10.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3463 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:50:14.18 -12:41:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:14.18 -12:41:52.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:50:35.72 -14:30:14.1: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:35.72 -14:30:14.1: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3846 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:50.10 -12:57:41.4: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:50.10 -12:57:41.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2996 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:02.63 -13:36:20.5: 14.87 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:28:49.90 -16:56:53.1: 14.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:02.63 -13:36:20.5: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.2688 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:28:49.90 -16:56:53.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1416 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:30:18.70 -15:38:33.6: 14.83 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:12.04 -14:58:55.3: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:39.79 -13:20:37.8: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:44.10 -12:48:39.5: 15.03 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:30:18.70 -15:38:33.6: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:50:15.67 -15:13:26.3: 14.91 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:30:18.70 -15:38:33.6: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2005 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:27.11 -13:57:57.2: 14.96 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:02:46.53 -13:15:27.2: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:39.79 -13:20:37.8: 14.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:39.79 -13:20:37.8: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3803 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:12.04 -14:58:55.3: 14.15 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:12.04 -14:58:55.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0239 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:21:05.29 -13:15:47.2: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:27.11 -13:57:57.2: 15.03 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:27.11 -13:57:57.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.2864 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:44.10 -12:48:39.5: 15.17 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:44.10 -12:48:39.5: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.3380 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:13:02.09 -14:14:34.2: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:50:15.67 -15:13:26.3: 15.06 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:15.67 -15:13:26.3: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.4092 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:21:05.29 -13:15:47.2: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:02:46.53 -13:15:27.2: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:05.29 -13:15:47.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2962 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:46.53 -13:15:27.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3920 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:13:02.09 -14:14:34.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:50.58 -14:44:15.3: 15.08 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:52:03.62 -13:38:11.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:52:03.62 -13:38:11.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:03.62 -13:38:11.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:50.58 -14:44:15.3: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:50.58 -14:44:15.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4807 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54198.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54445.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54697.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54880.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53606_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53606_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53607_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53611_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53611_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53615_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53615_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53616_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53616_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53629_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53629_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53632_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53632_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53635_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53635_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53703_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53703_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53798_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 53798_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53997_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 53997_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54052_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54052_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54143_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54143_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54158_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54158_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54175_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54175_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54198_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 54198_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54335_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54335_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54398_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54398_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54445_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 54445_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54471_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54471_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54488_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54488_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54506_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54506_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54510_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54510_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54525_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54525_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54562_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54562_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54586_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54586_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54596_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54596_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:23.63 -16:26:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54597_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54597_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54613_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54613_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54657_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54657_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54664_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54664_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54666_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54666_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54667_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54667_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54681_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54681_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54696_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54696_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54697_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 54697_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54704_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54704_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54705_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54705_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54708_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54708_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54713_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54713_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54721_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54721_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54722_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54722_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54724_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54724_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54744_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54744_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54749_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54749_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54751_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54751_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54753_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54753_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54754_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54754_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54757_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54757_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54760_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54760_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54778_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54778_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54779_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54779_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54816_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54816_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54821_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54821_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54829_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54829_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54830_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54830_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54832_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54832_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54836_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54836_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54837_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54837_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54847_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54847_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54850_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54850_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54854_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54854_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54865_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54865_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54872_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54872_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54880_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 54880_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54885_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54885_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54908_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 54908_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660
The candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0660 did not pass the final checks
