This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2113 2461242.7113 10.45 19:21:07.31 -31:23:51.2
6.90124 -19.61349 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V3955 Sgr
Type: SRD
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.700 V 12.100 V 2453636.00000 119.300000000000 G0-G5e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:21:07.31 -31:23:51.2: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:21:07.31 -31:23:51.2: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3955 Sgr,2461242.7113,10.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3955 Sgr 20260721.2113 10.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2113 2461242.7113 11.92 20:09:25.00 -35:11:50.5
6.16062 -30.36665 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.7" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.139 Juewa -3 -1 3 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 20:09:25.00 -35:11:50.5: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 20:09:25.00 -35:11:50.5: 13.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7113,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2113 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2113 2461242.7113 11.36 19:37:54.10 -36:12:46.6
3.18070 -24.45464 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia 0 0 0 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:37:54.10 -36:12:46.6: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:37:54.10 -36:12:46.6: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.7113,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.2113 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2113 2461242.7113 9.63 19:41:46.47 -38:59:58.6
0.44965 -25.95407 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1164 Sgr
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.460 V Y 0.660 V 2452156.20000 150.000000000000 :
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:41:46.47 -38:59:58.6: 10.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:41:46.47 -38:59:58.6: 10.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.56 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1164 Sgr,2461242.7113,9.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1164 Sgr 20260721.2113 9.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2113 2461242.7113 10.21 19:28:32.64 -35:11:59.8
3.61085 -22.33837 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J192833-3512.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
7.519 Ic Y 0.193 Ic 2452564.90000 69.040000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:28:32.64 -35:11:59.8: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:28:32.64 -35:11:59.8: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.14 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J192833-3512.0,2461242.7113,10.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J192833-3512.0 20260721.2113 10.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2113 2461242.7113 11.32 19:29:29.85 -38:05:28.0
0.68324 -23.39636 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" UV Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.800 pg 16.500 pg 2428290.00000 231.410000000000 M4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:29:29.85 -38:05:28.0: 12.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:29:29.85 -38:05:28.0: 12.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
UV Sgr,2461242.7113,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
UV Sgr 20260721.2113 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2113 2461242.7113 12.13 19:23:59.57 -29:58:58.0
8.53801 -19.69468 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1270 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.800 pg < 14.900 pg 2425847.00000 143.000000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:23:59.57 -29:58:58.0: 13.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:23:59.57 -29:58:58.0: 13.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1270 Sgr,2461242.7113,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1270 Sgr 20260721.2113 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.2113 2461242.7113 11.59 19:26:12.35 -29:27:15.6
9.24368 -19.95816 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0982 Sgr
Type: RVA:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.350 V 13.900 V 2454643.00000 237.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:26:12.35 -29:27:15.6: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:26:12.35 -29:27:15.6: 12.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0982 Sgr,2461242.7113,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0982 Sgr 20260721.2113 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82317245 17.06.2026 07:45:12.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
First image: 2461208.82317245 17.06.2026 07:45:12.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Last image: 2461242.71161803 21.07.2026 05:04:33.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 19
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5896
Objects passed selection criteria: 5890
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5319.75
Average stars matched: 5157.75 (96.9547 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114972 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 00:32:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82317245 17.06.2026 07:45:12.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
First image: 2461208.82317245 17.06.2026 07:45:12.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Last image: 2461242.71161803 21.07.2026 05:04:33.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 58
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47298
Objects passed selection criteria: 47235
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40651
Average stars matched: 39168.2 (96.3525 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 151776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 00:37:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.71092846
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.085 -34:00:56.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:55.830 -34:00:56.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.085 -34:00:56.77
Second-epoch image center 19:49:55.830 -34:00:56.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0716 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:58.174 -34:00:24.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.085 -34:00:56.77
Second-epoch image center 19:49:58.174 -34:00:24.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0802 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:55.830 -34:00:56.77
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:58.174 -34:00:24.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01205 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WS5Rb34ZLc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sCGDF9qUzw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9aGQ82jaSi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0LIwhjWoVF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5869 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4893 to 307.3629 deg, Dec -39.2781 to -28.5314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4893 to 307.3629 deg, Dec -39.2781 to -28.5314 deg
Loaded 9505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4760 out of 4839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4839 out of 5869 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.453550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.453550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5869 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4893 to 307.3629 deg, Dec -39.2781 to -28.5314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4893 to 307.3629 deg, Dec -39.2781 to -28.5314 deg
Loaded 9505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4760 out of 4839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4839 out of 5869 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4893 to 307.3627 deg, Dec -39.2781 to -28.5313 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4893 to 307.3627 deg, Dec -39.2781 to -28.5313 deg
Loaded 9506 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4787 out of 4877 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4877 out of 5946 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
2.4 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
3.6 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
3.6 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WS5Rb34ZLc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=372, bad_region=0, passed=5869
Got 5869 stars (including 5494 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5869 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=227 n_q2=220 n_q3=284 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sCGDF9qUzw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=381, bad_region=0, passed=5946
Got 5946 stars (including 5561 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=225 n_q2=219 n_q3=284 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9aGQ82jaSi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=246, bad_region=1, passed=4800
Got 4800 stars (including 4551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=229 n_q2=192 n_q3=305 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.444
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0LIwhjWoVF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=236, bad_region=0, passed=4814
Got 4814 stars (including 4575 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4814 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=225 n_q2=192 n_q3=307 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.377
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.208
ref2=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits sigma_overall=0.494 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new1=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits sigma_overall=0.467 worst_q_ratio=1.444
new2=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.377
reference average sigma_overall=0.499 worst_q_ratio=1.238
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:20:08.60 -29:59:19.4: 11.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:39:24.04 -32:14:34.4: 11.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:27:29.03 -34:24:19.3: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:32:32.76 -31:20:04.4: 10.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:34:46.03 -31:00:09.4: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:20:08.60 -29:59:19.4: 11.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:08.60 -29:59:19.4: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1053 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:32:32.76 -31:20:04.4: 10.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:32.76 -31:20:04.4: ref_mag=10.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7074 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:39:24.04 -32:14:34.4: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:27:29.03 -34:24:19.3: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:46:53.78 -32:10:25.7: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:18:38.26 -29:18:25.7: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:24.04 -32:14:34.4: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9084 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:29.03 -34:24:19.3: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9299 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:24:53.76 -31:04:17.1: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:26:27.90 -28:49:17.0: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:34:46.03 -31:00:09.4: 11.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:23:21.63 -30:17:55.3: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:46.03 -31:00:09.4: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1664 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:18:38.26 -29:18:25.7: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:46:53.78 -32:10:25.7: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:38.26 -29:18:25.7: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2213 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:53.78 -32:10:25.7: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1604 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:26:27.90 -28:49:17.0: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:27.90 -28:49:17.0: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2602 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:23:21.63 -30:17:55.3: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:21.63 -30:17:55.3: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2261 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:24:53.76 -31:04:17.1: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:53.76 -31:04:17.1: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2351 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:21:07.31 -31:23:51.2: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:21:07.31 -31:23:51.2: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:21:07.31 -31:23:51.2: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4507 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04071.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20430_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20430_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:11.21 -31:32:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20462_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20462_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20478_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20478_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:42.40 -34:22:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20495_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20495_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20497_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20497_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20510_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20510_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:21.54 -38:34:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20523_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20523_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:50.24 -30:55:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20524_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20531_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:35.29 -31:45:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20534_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20534_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20540_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20540_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20547_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20547_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20550_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20550_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20552_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20552_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20553_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20553_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20009_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 20009_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:52.46 -31:42:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04071_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
Preparing report for the candidate 04071_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:21:07.31 -31:23:51.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.085 -34:00:56.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:55.830 -34:00:56.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.085 -34:00:56.77
Second-epoch image center 19:49:55.830 -34:00:56.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0716 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:58.174 -34:00:24.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.085 -34:00:56.77
Second-epoch image center 19:49:58.174 -34:00:24.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0802 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:55.830 -34:00:56.77
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:58.174 -34:00:24.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01205 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.37SguZKQ1y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IYXBuMjz9f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oobKzSPvm1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jWAQjSunjn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 50622 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3772 to 307.3722 deg, Dec -39.2895 to -28.4747 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3772 to 307.3722 deg, Dec -39.2895 to -28.4747 deg
Loaded 9658 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7407 out of 7932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7932 out of 50622 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.265100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.265100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 50622 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3772 to 307.3722 deg, Dec -39.2895 to -28.4747 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3772 to 307.3722 deg, Dec -39.2895 to -28.4747 deg
Loaded 9658 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7407 out of 7932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7932 out of 50622 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 50277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4036 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2867 to -28.4735 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4036 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2867 to -28.4735 deg
Loaded 9643 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7411 out of 7942 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7942 out of 50277 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
3.3 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
3.3 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.37SguZKQ1y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2254, bad_region=0, passed=50615
Got 50615 stars (including 48288 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50615 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=226 n_q2=222 n_q3=275 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IYXBuMjz9f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2267, bad_region=0, passed=50267
Got 50267 stars (including 47932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=223 n_q2=227 n_q3=272 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oobKzSPvm1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1234, bad_region=2, passed=31526
Got 31526 stars (including 30240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31526 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=216 n_q2=190 n_q3=315 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.469
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jWAQjSunjn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1213, bad_region=2, passed=31512
Got 31512 stars (including 30258 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31512 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=213 n_q2=188 n_q3=317 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.394
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0557.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_000556_TTUQ1b1x1_2557898_DVo2peFd/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:26:57.65 -33:11:51.0: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 20:24:24.24 -29:29:25.9: 12.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:48:17.91 -36:38:35.6: 12.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:43:57.42 -29:13:56.4: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 20:09:25.00 -35:11:50.5: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:16:28.90 -32:32:29.7: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 20:25:20.29 -29:28:55.9: 12.81 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:37:54.10 -36:12:46.6: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:18:09.40 -31:27:22.4: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:23:38.50 -30:14:54.1: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:26:57.65 -33:11:51.0: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:57.65 -33:11:51.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8820 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 20:25:20.29 -29:28:55.9: 12.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:16:28.90 -32:32:29.7: 12.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 20:24:24.24 -29:29:25.9: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:48:17.91 -36:38:35.6: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:43:57.42 -29:13:56.4: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:20.29 -29:28:55.9: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1029 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:28.90 -32:32:29.7: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5874 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 20:09:25.00 -35:11:50.5: 13.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:17.91 -36:38:35.6: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4620 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:24.24 -29:29:25.9: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2496 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:57.42 -29:13:56.4: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4029 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:09:25.00 -35:11:50.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=11.8325 delta=1.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:18:09.40 -31:27:22.4: 11.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:23:38.50 -30:14:54.1: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:37:54.10 -36:12:46.6: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:09.40 -31:27:22.4: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8197 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:38.50 -30:14:54.1: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5288 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 20:23:04.71 -38:58:07.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:19:36.60 -28:36:53.0: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:36:56.09 -32:20:43.9: 13.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:19:48.33 -29:00:33.3: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:17:07.65 -31:00:20.0: 13.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:28:34.30 -31:00:15.4: 13.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 20:23:04.71 -38:58:07.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:04.71 -38:58:07.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:19:36.60 -28:36:53.0: 12.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:36.60 -28:36:53.0: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6684 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:16:15.27 -28:46:40.4: 13.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:34:54.34 -30:10:53.1: 13.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:19:48.33 -29:00:33.3: 13.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:17:07.65 -31:00:20.0: 14.14 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:48.33 -29:00:33.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.0501 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:07.65 -31:00:20.0: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2097 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:28:34.30 -31:00:15.4: 13.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:36:56.09 -32:20:43.9: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:56.09 -32:20:43.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0176 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:34.30 -31:00:15.4: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1762 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:16:15.27 -28:46:40.4: 13.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:34:54.34 -30:10:53.1: 13.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:15.27 -28:46:40.4: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3906 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:54.34 -30:10:53.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3029 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:28:33.95 -29:11:28.3: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:17:05.50 -29:02:32.7: 13.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:23:33.23 -28:51:07.6: 13.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:31:56.60 -28:42:24.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:34:29.29 -29:50:43.3: 13.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 20:22:22.93 -30:35:59.1: 13.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:28:33.95 -29:11:28.3: 13.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:33.95 -29:11:28.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4468 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:17:05.50 -29:02:32.7: 13.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:05.50 -29:02:32.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5344 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:45:18.82 -29:47:12.8: 13.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:41:54.86 -28:58:05.1: 13.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:23:33.23 -28:51:07.6: 13.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:31:56.60 -28:42:24.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:56.60 -28:42:24.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:33.23 -28:51:07.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6165 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:34:29.29 -29:50:43.3: 13.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 20:22:22.93 -30:35:59.1: 13.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:29.29 -29:50:43.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6170 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:22.93 -30:35:59.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2288 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:41:54.86 -28:58:05.1: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:45:18.82 -29:47:12.8: 13.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:54.86 -28:58:05.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5293 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:18.82 -29:47:12.8: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4872 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:36:50.69 -35:16:18.7: 14.61 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 20:19:33.59 -30:29:37.2: 13.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:36:50.69 -35:16:18.7: 14.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:36:50.69 -35:16:18.7: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.3159 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 20:19:33.59 -30:29:37.2: 13.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:41:46.47 -38:59:58.6: 10.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:28:32.64 -35:11:59.8: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:33.59 -30:29:37.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5303 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:41:46.47 -38:59:58.6: 10.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:28:32.64 -35:11:59.8: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:41:46.47 -38:59:58.6: ref_mag=10.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.6301 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:28:32.64 -35:11:59.8: ref_mag=11.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2048 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:23:59.57 -29:58:58.0: 13.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:29:29.85 -38:05:28.0: 12.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-45-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits at 19:26:12.35 -29:27:15.6: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:23:59.57 -29:58:58.0: 13.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:23:59.57 -29:58:58.0: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.1350 delta=1.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:29:29.85 -38:05:28.0: 12.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:29:29.85 -38:05:28.0: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3099 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits at 19:26:12.35 -29:27:15.6: 12.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:26:12.35 -29:27:15.6: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.5859 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out66153.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00688.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03209.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14214.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31515.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34429.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64967.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65224.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64951_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64951_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64954_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64954_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64958_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64958_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64960_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64960_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:08.25 -28:53:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64961_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64961_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64963_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64963_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64964_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64964_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:12.80 -29:03:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64966_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64966_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:57.94 -30:19:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64967_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
Preparing report for the candidate 64967_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64969_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64969_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64971_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 64971_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65179_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65179_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65224_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
Preparing report for the candidate 65224_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65254_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65254_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:44.16 -28:41:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65303_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65303_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65508_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65508_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:21.51 -29:41:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65516_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65516_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65599_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65599_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:23.42 -36:25:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65691_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65691_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.87 -29:30:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65702_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65702_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65753_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65753_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:50.33 -34:30:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65816_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65816_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65847_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65847_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:10.86 -31:15:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65860_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65860_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65869_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65869_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65896_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65896_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65930_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65930_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65955_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65955_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65958_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 65958_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66032_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 66032_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66062_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 66062_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66102_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 66102_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66103_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 66103_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66114_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 66114_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66127_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 66127_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66153_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 66153_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:50.69 -35:16:18.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.732 6741197770916882688 294.21097879314 -35.27178213350 12.3157 10.9947 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.732#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66207_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 66207_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26693_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 26693_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:42.37 -32:44:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00688_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
Preparing report for the candidate 00688_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14214_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
Preparing report for the candidate 14214_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12623_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 12623_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:09.28 -35:26:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04878_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 04878_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:39.30 -37:26:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01621_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 01621_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:21.55 -38:34:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48778_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 48778_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:52.48 -31:42:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33151_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 33151_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:10.44 -32:36:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42076_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 42076_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.13 -29:54:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19171_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 19171_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:42.39 -34:22:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03209_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
Preparing report for the candidate 03209_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34429_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
Preparing report for the candidate 34429_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48416_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 48416_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:35.30 -31:45:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37401_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558
The candidate 37401_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_00-04-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0558 did not pass the final checks
