This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1402 2461242.6402 9.14 19:02:17.09 -22:36:30.1
13.67062 -12.36650 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 1 -0 1 9.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:17.09 -22:36:30.1: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:17.09 -22:36:30.1: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6402,9.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1402 9.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1402 2461242.6402 11.23 18:58:14.97 -28:05:11.5
8.15415 -13.76925 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 1 1 11.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:14.97 -28:05:11.5: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:14.97 -28:05:11.5: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6402,11.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1402 11.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1402 2461242.6402 11.44 19:07:14.59 -30:13:37.0
6.90634 -16.41209 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -0 1 1 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:14.59 -30:13:37.0: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:14.59 -30:13:37.0: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6402,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1402 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1402 2461242.6402 13.56 19:20:42.85 -22:50:16.8
15.22243 -16.34801 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.468 Lina 1 2 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:42.85 -22:50:16.8: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:20:42.85 -22:50:16.8: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6402,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1402 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1402 2461242.6402 13.60 19:02:17.69 -27:19:48.2
9.23775 -14.28763 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.503 Evelyn 1 1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:17.69 -27:19:48.2: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:17.69 -27:19:48.2: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6402,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1402 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.1402 2461242.6402 12.32 18:50:17.04 -24:20:51.7
10.88209 -10.59743 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne -1 0 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:17.04 -24:20:51.7: 14.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:17.04 -24:20:51.7: 14.38 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.6402,12.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.1402 12.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461242.64055365 21.07.2026 03:22:13.835 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8665
Objects passed selection criteria: 8656
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7799.25
Average stars matched: 7749.75 (99.3653 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 00:19:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461242.64055365 21.07.2026 03:22:13.835 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 115
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 74 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 103854
Objects passed selection criteria: 103694
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97012
Average stars matched: 95304.5 (98.2399 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1898548 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 00:23:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.63984484
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.995 -26:00:26.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.995 -26:00:26.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.396 -25:59:46.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.396 -25:59:46.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0061 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:57.995 -26:00:26.58
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:00.396 -25:59:46.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01431 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rdjWUTlwDx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bvWEI9WCYu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tvYL1EEJUB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O6tkfX641a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.547700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.547700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9561 to 297.0874 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5650 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9561 to 297.0874 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5650 deg
Loaded 13339 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7826 out of 8095 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8095 out of 10687 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rdjWUTlwDx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=2274, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 10138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=321 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bvWEI9WCYu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=726, bad_region=1847, passed=10687
Got 10687 stars (including 8208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.690 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.534 n_q1=311 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tvYL1EEJUB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=498, bad_region=1119, passed=6878
Got 6878 stars (including 5314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6878 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.738 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.557 n_q1=313 n_q2=137 n_q3=284 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O6tkfX641a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=495, bad_region=1135, passed=6958
Got 6958 stars (including 5375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.554 n_q1=313 n_q2=141 n_q3=288 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.371
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.567 worst_q_ratio=1.218
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits sigma_overall=0.633 worst_q_ratio=1.167
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits sigma_overall=0.597 worst_q_ratio=1.229
reference average sigma_overall=0.5365 worst_q_ratio=1.2945
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:40.91 -28:19:50.8: 9.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:17.09 -22:36:30.1: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:40.91 -28:19:50.8: 10.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:40.91 -28:19:50.8: ref_mag=9.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2904 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:17.09 -22:36:30.1: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20173.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20170_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 20170_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20173_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
Preparing report for the candidate 20173_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:02:17.09 -22:36:30.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.995 -26:00:26.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.995 -26:00:26.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.396 -25:59:46.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.396 -25:59:46.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0061 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:57.995 -26:00:26.58
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:00.396 -25:59:46.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01431 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d4gtvIpekF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uAUNwG71pM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qA8zSHlaqL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BeW0QvEBP7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.361800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.361800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 118893 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9129 to 297.0888 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5527 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9129 to 297.0888 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5527 deg
Loaded 13400 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10023 out of 11609 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11609 out of 118893 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 76 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.d4gtvIpekF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=17584, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 115576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=325 n_q2=171 n_q3=233 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.513
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uAUNwG71pM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=8799, bad_region=12630, passed=118884
Got 118884 stars (including 98108 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 118884 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.739 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=323 n_q2=157 n_q3=250 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qA8zSHlaqL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4816, bad_region=8150, passed=86575
Got 86575 stars (including 73847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86575 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.752 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.521 n_q1=337 n_q2=137 n_q3=258 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BeW0QvEBP7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4815, bad_region=8216, passed=86558
Got 86558 stars (including 73752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86558 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.670 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.742 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=336 n_q2=141 n_q3=252 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-21-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0561.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_222631_TTUQ2b1x1_2678898_P47wpxsC/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:30.38 -29:28:12.0: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:46.34 -23:51:25.5: 13.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:18.92 -25:00:53.6: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:21.59 -24:23:47.9: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:15.39 -25:27:57.2: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:07.39 -27:36:02.4: 13.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:40.32 -21:51:31.2: 13.54 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:57.79 -24:25:51.2: 13.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:45.15 -25:48:58.5: 13.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:15:07.39 -27:36:02.4: 13.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:04:21.59 -24:23:47.9: 13.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:12:15.39 -25:27:57.2: 13.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:07.39 -27:36:02.4: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5166 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:21.59 -24:23:47.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8446 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:04:40.32 -21:51:31.2: 13.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:15.39 -25:27:57.2: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4376 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:40.32 -21:51:31.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7402 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:38.67 -23:41:46.7: 13.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:01:57.79 -24:25:51.2: 13.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:11:30.38 -29:28:12.0: 13.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:57.79 -24:25:51.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5645 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:09:18.92 -25:00:53.6: 13.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:11:30.38 -29:28:12.0: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5071 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:55:46.34 -23:51:25.5: 13.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:18.92 -25:00:53.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5754 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:46.34 -23:51:25.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6945 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:57:45.15 -25:48:58.5: 14.30 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:45.15 -25:48:58.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9675 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:38.67 -23:41:46.7: 13.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:38.67 -23:41:46.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4497 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:33.95 -23:06:35.0: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:15.15 -25:31:53.2: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:13.31 -22:56:35.9: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:17.55 -23:12:22.3: 13.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:12.22 -25:19:03.8: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:58.55 -21:49:55.2: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:12:33.95 -23:06:35.0: 13.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:33.95 -23:06:35.0: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4682 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:23.87 -25:10:09.3: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:55:12.22 -25:19:03.8: 13.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:12:13.31 -22:56:35.9: 13.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:12.22 -25:19:03.8: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4106 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:13.31 -22:56:35.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2550 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:17.61 -22:04:30.5: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:17.55 -23:12:22.3: 13.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:58.55 -21:49:55.2: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:17.55 -23:12:22.3: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4883 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:18:15.15 -25:31:53.2: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:58.55 -21:49:55.2: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1438 delta=-0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:28.46 -29:34:38.0: 12.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:15.15 -25:31:53.2: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3612 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:39.11 -22:03:55.3: 12.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:30:23.87 -25:10:09.3: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:23.87 -25:10:09.3: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7787 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:12:17.61 -22:04:30.5: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:17.61 -22:04:30.5: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0672 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:28.46 -29:34:38.0: 12.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:28.46 -29:34:38.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0543 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:39.11 -22:03:55.3: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:39.11 -22:03:55.3: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1714 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:42.82 -23:08:14.6: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:56.14 -22:35:04.3: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:01.04 -24:18:01.9: 12.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:32.75 -27:41:53.9: 12.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:29.32 -26:08:05.3: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:38.10 -26:30:52.8: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:26.85 -29:42:38.8: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:18.85 -25:54:10.3: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:52:56.14 -22:35:04.3: 12.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:01.04 -24:18:01.9: 12.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:12:42.82 -23:08:14.6: 12.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:56.14 -22:35:04.3: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1296 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:01.04 -24:18:01.9: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0166 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:42.82 -23:08:14.6: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6960 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:06:29.32 -26:08:05.3: 12.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:29.32 -26:08:05.3: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9639 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:40.98 -28:19:49.9: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:41:32.75 -27:41:53.9: 12.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:32.75 -27:41:53.9: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9173 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:56:18.85 -25:54:10.3: 12.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:18.85 -25:54:10.3: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6418 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:38.10 -26:30:52.8: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:38.10 -26:30:52.8: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5179 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:40.98 -28:19:49.9: 10.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.29 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:40.98 -28:19:49.9: ref_mag=10.29 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3519 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:51:26.85 -29:42:38.8: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:26.85 -29:42:38.8: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3439 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:14.97 -28:05:11.5: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:14.59 -30:13:37.0: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:04.69 -22:23:19.2: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:14.97 -28:05:11.5: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:23:01.18 -29:04:19.7: 12.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:14.59 -30:13:37.0: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:54:04.69 -22:23:19.2: 12.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:06.48 -26:36:53.2: 13.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:04.69 -22:23:19.2: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6659 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:24.71 -27:15:45.4: 13.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:23:01.18 -29:04:19.7: 12.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:01.18 -29:04:19.7: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7214 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:45:06.48 -26:36:53.2: 13.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:47.24 -25:06:09.6: 13.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:06.48 -26:36:53.2: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1233 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:00.82 -25:01:33.7: 13.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:07.62 -21:42:14.7: 13.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:42:24.71 -27:15:45.4: 13.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:24.71 -27:15:45.4: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3664 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:17.86 -21:56:17.8: 13.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:08:47.24 -25:06:09.6: 13.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:47.24 -25:06:09.6: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1697 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:00.82 -25:01:33.7: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:00.82 -25:01:33.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5086 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:44:07.62 -21:42:14.7: 13.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:07.62 -21:42:14.7: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5901 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:32.17 -23:16:45.3: 13.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:48.66 -22:33:12.6: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:41.17 -22:42:15.3: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:49:17.86 -21:56:17.8: 13.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:17.86 -21:56:17.8: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7029 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:03:32.17 -23:16:45.3: 13.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:32.17 -23:16:45.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5974 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:06:48.66 -22:33:12.6: 13.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:48.66 -22:33:12.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5250 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:57:41.17 -22:42:15.3: 13.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:43.65 -23:40:48.1: 13.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:41.17 -22:42:15.3: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4932 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:31.97 -26:42:32.3: 13.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:42.85 -22:50:16.8: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:17.69 -27:19:48.2: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:45:43.65 -23:40:48.1: 14.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:43.65 -23:40:48.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8974 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:17.66 -26:35:03.2: 14.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:41:31.97 -26:42:32.3: 13.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:31.97 -26:42:32.3: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6136 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:20:42.85 -22:50:16.8: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:17.69 -27:19:48.2: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:38.19 -22:20:56.6: 13.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:06.41 -26:53:32.7: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:04.62 -23:29:39.8: 13.95 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:17.66 -26:35:03.2: 14.32 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:17.66 -26:35:03.2: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8889 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:52:38.19 -22:20:56.6: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:38.19 -22:20:56.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8637 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:15.23 -24:37:12.3: 13.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:06.41 -26:53:32.7: 14.90 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:10:04.62 -23:29:39.8: 13.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:10:04.62 -23:29:39.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8692 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:02:06.41 -26:53:32.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.6711 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:42.18 -28:01:08.2: 14.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:15.23 -24:37:12.3: 14.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:15.23 -24:37:12.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0003 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:03:42.18 -28:01:08.2: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:42.18 -28:01:08.2: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7772 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:14.55 -27:59:03.9: 14.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:58.96 -22:47:49.1: 14.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:40.41 -23:01:36.1: 14.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:14.55 -27:59:03.9: 13.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:14.55 -27:59:03.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9124 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:54:58.96 -22:47:49.1: 14.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:58.96 -22:47:49.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0440 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:19.20 -25:40:28.2: 14.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:32.32 -23:08:34.5: 14.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:53:40.41 -23:01:36.1: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:40.41 -23:01:36.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1503 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:04:19.20 -25:40:28.2: 14.50 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:19.20 -25:40:28.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0810 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:12:32.32 -23:08:34.5: 14.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:32.32 -23:08:34.5: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9887 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:17.04 -24:20:51.7: 14.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:17.04 -24:20:51.7: 14.38 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:50:17.04 -24:20:51.7: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.3236 delta=2.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161801.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161447.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161457.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161765.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161786.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91236.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161251_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161251_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161252_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161252_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:57.24 -23:29:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161266_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161266_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161286_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161286_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161297_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161297_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161300_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161300_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161306_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161306_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161311_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161311_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161323_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161323_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161331_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161331_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161345_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161345_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:53.67 -26:10:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161346_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161346_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161347_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161347_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161351_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161351_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161354_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161354_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161355_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161355_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161365_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161365_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:04.06 -24:17:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161373_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161373_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:25.85 -22:07:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161375_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161375_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161380_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161380_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161383_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161383_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161387_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161387_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161389_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161389_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161391_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161391_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:12.99 -23:27:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161393_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161393_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161394_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161394_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161398_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161398_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161399_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161399_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161413_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161413_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161414_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161414_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161418_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161418_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161426_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161426_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161430_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161430_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:17.10 -22:36:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161447_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
Preparing report for the candidate 161447_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161457_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
Preparing report for the candidate 161457_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161514_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161514_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161516_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161516_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.64 -22:42:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161524_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161524_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.92 -21:49:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161539_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161539_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:09.23 -24:30:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161543_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161543_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:17.81 -25:10:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161559_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161559_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161592_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161592_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161596_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161596_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:37.26 -22:27:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161598_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161598_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:09.22 -23:24:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161630_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161630_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:01.38 -30:01:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161634_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161634_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:10.34 -22:54:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161639_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161639_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161657_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161657_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.71 -29:30:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161659_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161659_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161662_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161662_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161668_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161668_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161676_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161676_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.44 -27:38:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161687_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161687_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161690_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161690_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161698_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161698_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161701_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161701_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161737_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161737_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:53.28 -25:12:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161744_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161744_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161762_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161762_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161765_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
Preparing report for the candidate 161765_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161786_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
Preparing report for the candidate 161786_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161794_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161794_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161801_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161801_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:06.41 -26:53:32.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.945 6763718178541730688 285.52694848938 -26.89320629063 12.3204 10.2183 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.945#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161835_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161835_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161838_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161838_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161844_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161844_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161855_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161855_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:29.76 -24:20:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161861_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161861_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161874_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161874_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161880_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161880_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161881_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161881_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161923_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562
The candidate 161923_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_22-22-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0562 did not pass the final checks
