This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 11.71 05:46:31.23 +33:33:40.0
176.14754 2.56819 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 -1 1 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:31.23 +33:33:40.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:31.23 +33:33:40.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9519,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4519 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 12.88 05:40:35.50 +31:04:14.8
177.61191 0.19596 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 0 -2 2 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:40:35.50 +31:04:14.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:40:35.50 +31:04:14.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9519,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4519 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 11.51 06:04:28.62 +29:51:03.1
181.28110 4.00821 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" BT Aur
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 pg 18.500 pg 2427085.00000 560.000000000000 M8:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:28.62 +29:51:03.1: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:28.62 +29:51:03.1: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BT Aur,2461241.9519,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BT Aur 20260720.4519 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 11.29 06:29:12.88 +30:56:47.7
182.79661 9.24090 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J062912.79+305650.5
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.820 V 13.640 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:12.88 +30:56:47.7: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:12.88 +30:56:47.7: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J062912.79+305650.5,2461241.9519,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J062912.79+305650.5 20260720.4519 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 10.90 05:59:31.48 +31:56:02.6
178.93877 4.10380 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0559317+315606
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.273 g Y 1.151 g 2458497.56350 172.065571500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:59:31.48 +31:56:02.6: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:31.48 +31:56:02.6: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0559317+315606,2461241.9519,10.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0559317+315606 20260720.4519 10.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 11.49 06:22:50.07 +30:19:49.2
182.73303 7.73785 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0578 Aur
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.200 w 11.900 w 730.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:22:50.07 +30:19:49.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:50.07 +30:19:49.2: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0578 Aur,2461241.9519,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0578 Aur 20260720.4519 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 11.51 06:17:34.02 +25:26:39.8
186.55077 4.44864 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASAS J061734+2526.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.830 V Y 0.440 V 2453072.70000 180.014003000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:17:34.02 +25:26:39.8: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:34.02 +25:26:39.8: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J061734+2526.7,2461241.9519,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J061734+2526.7 20260720.4519 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 11.79 05:56:48.40 +30:50:08.4
179.60491 3.05455 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J055648.36+305009.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.060 g Y 1.711 g 2458573.12890 285.375046000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:48.40 +30:50:08.4: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:48.40 +30:50:08.4: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J055648.36+305009.0,2461241.9519,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J055648.36+305009.0 20260720.4519 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 11.25 06:15:28.52 +27:23:45.2
184.60162 4.95259 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" LS Gem
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.600 pg 16.000 : pg 2438048.00000 346.000000000000 : M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:15:28.52 +27:23:45.2: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:28.52 +27:23:45.2: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
LS Gem,2461241.9519,11.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
LS Gem 20260720.4519 11.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 8.70 06:09:57.76 +31:24:27.1
180.48106 5.79154 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" BU Aur
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.300 pg 11.800 pg 2426655.00000 169.000000000000 M1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:57.76 +31:24:27.1: 9.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:57.76 +31:24:27.1: 9.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.77 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BU Aur,2461241.9519,8.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BU Aur 20260720.4519 8.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4519 2461241.9519 11.72 05:49:47.45 +29:32:52.9
179.94695 1.09514 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 16685
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 V 14.100 V 335.000000000000 C(N)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:47.45 +29:32:52.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:47.45 +29:32:52.9: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 16685,2461241.9519,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 16685 20260720.4519 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461241.95236270 20.07.2026 10:51:14.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25129
Objects passed selection criteria: 24914
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14749
Average stars matched: 14265.2 (96.7201 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132556 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 09:39:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461241.95236270 20.07.2026 10:51:14.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 161
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 192751
Objects passed selection criteria: 192014
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 118730
Average stars matched: 113638 (95.7113 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2052652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 09:47:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461241.95152605
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.863 +29:59:25.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.863 +29:59:25.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:02.421 +30:00:06.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.421 +30:00:06.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:01.863 +29:59:25.35
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:02.421 +30:00:06.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01164 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nNfdPS1d1f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gc25AxMDBA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z7IlEHMojj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RsTGo3meQm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec +24.3432 to +35.3120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec 24.3432 to 35.3120 deg
Loaded 17084 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12065 out of 13603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13603 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
12.3 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.3 (SNR ) 9.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nNfdPS1d1f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=182 n_q2=276 n_q3=215 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Gc25AxMDBA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=187 n_q2=281 n_q3=208 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z7IlEHMojj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=2603
Got 2603 stars (including 2247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2603 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=249 n_q2=156 n_q3=347 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.428
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RsTGo3meQm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, bad_region=0, passed=2388
Got 2388 stars (including 1978 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2388 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.597 n_q1=260 n_q2=156 n_q3=342 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.055
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.136
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.428
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits sigma_overall=0.466 worst_q_ratio=1.332
reference average sigma_overall=0.4995 worst_q_ratio=1.0955
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406_astrometric_residuals.png (926 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407_astrometric_residuals.png (929 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.863 +29:59:25.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.863 +29:59:25.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:02.421 +30:00:06.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.421 +30:00:06.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:01.863 +29:59:25.35
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:02.421 +30:00:06.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01164 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4Evu8W7tS4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hph5KXfdPl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cLZ66mRco8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YFzvA3uXGX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec +24.3258 to +35.3145 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec 24.3258 to 35.3145 deg
Loaded 17176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9258 out of 14259 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14259 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 151 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4Evu8W7tS4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=199 n_q2=266 n_q3=222 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Hph5KXfdPl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=198 n_q2=272 n_q3=210 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cLZ66mRco8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1118, bad_region=0, passed=26833
Got 26833 stars (including 25676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26833 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.557 n_q1=254 n_q2=146 n_q3=346 n_q4=178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.428
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YFzvA3uXGX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=973, bad_region=0, passed=25267
Got 25267 stars (including 24259 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.717 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.589 n_q1=259 n_q2=149 n_q3=345 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.527
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-50-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055318_TTUQ1b1x1_514616_gAkF4aDw/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:45:45.54 +33:43:49.3: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:20.38 +32:33:47.3: 11.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:50:38.07 +26:03:37.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:22.03 +32:31:09.0: 11.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:20.38 +32:33:47.3: 11.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:45:45.54 +33:43:49.3: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:22.03 +32:31:09.0: 11.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:50:38.07 +26:03:37.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:20.38 +32:33:47.3: ref_mag=11.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.2162 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:45.54 +33:43:49.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1016 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:22.03 +32:31:09.0: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4735 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:38.07 +26:03:37.3: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0530 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:50.14 +25:25:57.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:10.78 +25:03:08.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:50.14 +25:25:57.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:50.14 +25:25:57.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:26:51.92 +24:58:16.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:27:18.27 +25:22:24.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:24.78 +24:50:58.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:30.98 +25:40:55.6: 9.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:40.30 +26:34:44.8: 9.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:59.61 +24:50:53.8: 9.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:10.78 +25:03:08.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:10.78 +25:03:08.0: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:39.27 +26:30:33.9: 9.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:00.35 +26:51:01.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:24.78 +24:50:58.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:24.78 +24:50:58.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:18.27 +25:22:24.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:18.27 +25:22:24.9: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:51.92 +24:58:16.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:51.92 +24:58:16.0: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:30.98 +25:40:55.6: 9.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:30.98 +25:40:55.6: ref_mag=9.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9208 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:40.30 +26:34:44.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:40.30 +26:34:44.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:59.61 +24:50:53.8: 9.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:59.61 +24:50:53.8: ref_mag=9.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9164 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:27:22.40 +25:08:35.6: 9.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:39.27 +26:30:33.9: 9.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:00.35 +26:51:01.0: 9.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:39.27 +26:30:33.9: ref_mag=9.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8879 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:00.35 +26:51:01.0: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:04.38 +24:27:36.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:22.40 +25:08:35.6: 9.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:22.40 +25:08:35.6: ref_mag=9.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9254 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:39.18 +25:03:55.2: 9.67 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:09.74 +25:17:03.0: 9.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:50.58 +26:45:21.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:24:48.64 +24:42:33.4: 9.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:55.65 +26:39:45.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:55.45 +25:25:29.5: 9.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:04.38 +24:27:36.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:04.38 +24:27:36.4: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:25.51 +25:43:01.6: 9.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:27:21.06 +24:30:40.1: 9.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:09.74 +25:17:03.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:09.74 +25:17:03.0: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:50.58 +26:45:21.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:50.58 +26:45:21.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:39.18 +25:03:55.2: 9.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:39.18 +25:03:55.2: ref_mag=9.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0430 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:55.65 +26:39:45.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:55.65 +26:39:45.2: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:48.64 +24:42:33.4: 9.67 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:55.45 +25:25:29.5: 9.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.68 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:48.64 +24:42:33.4: ref_mag=9.68 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1190 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:55.45 +25:25:29.5: ref_mag=9.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2033 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:04.33 +26:17:23.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:21.06 +24:30:40.1: 9.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:25.51 +25:43:01.6: 9.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:21.06 +24:30:40.1: ref_mag=9.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1492 delta=-0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.81 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:25.51 +25:43:01.6: ref_mag=9.81 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1531 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:24.52 +25:19:47.8: 9.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:04.33 +26:17:23.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:04.33 +26:17:23.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:40.34 +24:34:47.5: 9.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:38.87 +25:42:10.9: 9.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:20.78 +26:08:35.3: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:46.73 +26:23:07.4: 9.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:46.91 +25:59:38.4: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:22.16 +25:54:05.8: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:24.52 +25:19:47.8: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:24.52 +25:19:47.8: ref_mag=9.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2155 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:22.84 +26:31:26.0: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:40.34 +24:34:47.5: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:16.80 +26:22:30.5: 9.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:40.34 +24:34:47.5: ref_mag=9.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2052 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:38.87 +25:42:10.9: 9.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:20.78 +26:08:35.3: 9.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.83 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:38.87 +25:42:10.9: ref_mag=9.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2608 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:46.73 +26:23:07.4: 9.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:20.78 +26:08:35.3: ref_mag=9.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2975 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:46.73 +26:23:07.4: ref_mag=9.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2837 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:46.91 +25:59:38.4: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:46.91 +25:59:38.4: ref_mag=9.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2707 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:22.16 +25:54:05.8: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:22.16 +25:54:05.8: ref_mag=10.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2559 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:02.61 +26:15:11.0: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:22.84 +26:31:26.0: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:16.80 +26:22:30.5: 9.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:22.84 +26:31:26.0: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4398 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:16.80 +26:22:30.5: ref_mag=9.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4652 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:02.61 +26:15:11.0: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:43.34 +24:59:00.0: 9.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:02.61 +26:15:11.0: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4250 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:40.60 +24:29:32.9: 9.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:13.09 +25:25:55.3: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:05.43 +26:43:57.1: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:54.34 +25:19:38.5: 9.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:44.81 +25:12:02.6: 9.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:24.23 +26:00:29.5: 10.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:43.34 +24:59:00.0: 9.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:43.34 +24:59:00.0: ref_mag=9.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4341 delta=-0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:36.76 +25:44:16.1: 10.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:56.17 +26:48:58.5: 10.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:40.60 +24:29:32.9: 9.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:13.09 +25:25:55.3: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:40.60 +24:29:32.9: ref_mag=9.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3088 delta=-0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:05.43 +26:43:57.1: 10.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:13.09 +25:25:55.3: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5641 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:54.34 +25:19:38.5: 9.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:05.43 +26:43:57.1: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6007 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:54.34 +25:19:38.5: ref_mag=9.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4070 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:44.81 +25:12:02.6: 9.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:44.81 +25:12:02.6: ref_mag=9.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5958 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:24.23 +26:00:29.5: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:24.23 +26:00:29.5: ref_mag=10.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6268 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:27:10.10 +25:41:58.4: 10.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:36.76 +25:44:16.1: 10.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.09 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:36.76 +25:44:16.1: ref_mag=10.09 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6116 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:56.17 +26:48:58.5: 10.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:56.17 +26:48:58.5: ref_mag=10.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6706 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:10.10 +25:41:58.4: 10.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:03.56 +26:28:06.5: 10.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:10.10 +25:41:58.4: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6682 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:35.05 +26:24:34.3: 10.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:11.06 +26:53:13.6: 10.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:26:00.39 +25:20:11.9: 10.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:29.56 +25:59:05.0: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:32.88 +25:07:23.9: 10.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:03.56 +26:28:06.5: 10.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:03.56 +26:28:06.5: ref_mag=10.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6993 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:09.59 +24:25:04.1: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:19.25 +25:24:02.5: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:09.30 +26:05:09.7: 10.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:11.06 +26:53:13.6: 10.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:35.05 +26:24:34.3: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:00.39 +25:20:11.9: 10.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.28 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:11.06 +26:53:13.6: ref_mag=10.28 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8055 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:35.05 +26:24:34.3: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7573 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:00.39 +25:20:11.9: ref_mag=10.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7585 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:29.56 +25:59:05.0: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:29.56 +25:59:05.0: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7815 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:32.88 +25:07:23.9: 10.04 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:32.88 +25:07:23.9: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7679 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:39.50 +25:15:20.0: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:09.59 +24:25:04.1: 10.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:09.59 +24:25:04.1: ref_mag=10.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5982 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:19.25 +25:24:02.5: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:19.25 +25:24:02.5: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8327 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:09.30 +26:05:09.7: 10.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:09.30 +26:05:09.7: ref_mag=10.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8411 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:39.50 +25:15:20.0: 10.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:17.18 +24:33:19.3: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.44 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:39.50 +25:15:20.0: ref_mag=10.44 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9044 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:21.90 +25:48:05.3: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:20.82 +24:49:44.9: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:43.12 +24:54:51.3: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:32.24 +24:39:02.8: 10.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:33.91 +25:18:25.3: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:17.18 +24:33:19.3: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:17.18 +24:33:19.3: ref_mag=10.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7256 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:31.23 +33:33:40.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:09.15 +24:36:25.3: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:21.90 +25:48:05.3: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:21.90 +25:48:05.3: ref_mag=10.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8145 delta=-0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:20.82 +24:49:44.9: 10.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:43.12 +24:54:51.3: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.44 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:20.82 +24:49:44.9: ref_mag=10.44 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8356 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:43.12 +24:54:51.3: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8023 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:32.24 +24:39:02.8: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:24:07.79 +24:32:23.8: 10.34 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:32.24 +24:39:02.8: ref_mag=10.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7740 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:33.91 +25:18:25.3: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:33.91 +25:18:25.3: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8894 delta=-0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:11.30 +24:55:19.3: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:31.23 +33:33:40.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:09.15 +24:36:25.3: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:09.15 +24:36:25.3: ref_mag=10.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7715 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:07.79 +24:32:23.8: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:07.79 +24:32:23.8: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8363 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:11.30 +24:55:19.3: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:13.41 +24:34:26.1: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:11.30 +24:55:19.3: ref_mag=10.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8576 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:57.56 +26:15:26.6: 10.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:31.23 +24:39:01.7: 10.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:35.07 +24:45:10.3: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:38.47 +25:16:13.0: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:13.41 +24:34:26.1: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:13.41 +24:34:26.1: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9179 delta=-0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:09.61 +24:49:56.8: 10.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:57.56 +26:15:26.6: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.79 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:27:55.62 +24:52:39.1: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:31.23 +24:39:01.7: 10.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:57.56 +26:15:26.6: ref_mag=10.79 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0636 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:31.23 +24:39:01.7: ref_mag=10.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0448 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:35.07 +24:45:10.3: 10.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:35.07 +24:45:10.3: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0741 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:40.57 +24:56:50.0: 10.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:38.47 +25:16:13.0: 10.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:38.47 +25:16:13.0: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8293 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:38.38 +26:04:15.7: 10.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:09.61 +24:49:56.8: 10.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:09.61 +24:49:56.8: ref_mag=10.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9897 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:55.62 +24:52:39.1: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.37 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:55.62 +24:52:39.1: ref_mag=10.37 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0603 delta=-0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:40.57 +24:56:50.0: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:40.57 +24:56:50.0: ref_mag=10.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8261 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:03.13 +24:36:01.8: 10.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:38.38 +26:04:15.7: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:38.38 +26:04:15.7: ref_mag=10.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0980 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:59.36 +25:39:36.5: 10.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:21.48 +26:27:50.7: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:23.30 +25:56:20.0: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:03.13 +24:36:01.8: 10.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:24:02.02 +24:37:25.2: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:03.13 +24:36:01.8: ref_mag=10.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0316 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:27:25.35 +25:42:18.1: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:59.36 +25:39:36.5: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:48.83 +26:04:14.4: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:21.48 +26:27:50.7: 10.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:59.36 +25:39:36.5: ref_mag=10.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9812 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:21.48 +26:27:50.7: ref_mag=10.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0515 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:23.30 +25:56:20.0: 10.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:27.53 +26:40:57.0: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:23.30 +25:56:20.0: ref_mag=10.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1435 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:23.52 +25:30:30.9: 10.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:02.02 +24:37:25.2: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:02.02 +24:37:25.2: ref_mag=10.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0129 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:25.35 +25:42:18.1: 10.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:25.35 +25:42:18.1: ref_mag=10.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0287 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:48.83 +26:04:14.4: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.63 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:48.83 +26:04:14.4: ref_mag=10.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1659 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:27.53 +26:40:57.0: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:27.53 +26:40:57.0: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0485 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:23.52 +25:30:30.9: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:35.29 +25:15:28.9: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:23.52 +25:30:30.9: ref_mag=10.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0965 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:31.02 +26:00:34.9: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:27:32.11 +25:33:31.8: 10.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:35.29 +25:15:28.9: 10.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:35.29 +25:15:28.9: ref_mag=10.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1029 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:32.11 +25:33:31.8: 10.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:31.02 +26:00:34.9: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:24.06 +32:33:21.8: 12.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:32.11 +25:33:31.8: ref_mag=10.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2290 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:31.02 +26:00:34.9: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0742 delta=-0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:40:35.50 +31:04:14.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:24.06 +32:33:21.8: 12.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:24.06 +32:33:21.8: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.1931 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:40:35.50 +31:04:14.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:26.78 +27:08:03.7: 10.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:50.27 +24:52:20.9: 9.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:02.46 +25:00:24.0: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:24.63 +24:39:57.1: 10.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:28.62 +29:51:03.1: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:26.78 +27:08:03.7: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:26.78 +27:08:03.7: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0706 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:50.27 +24:52:20.9: 9.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.91 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:50.27 +24:52:20.9: ref_mag=9.91 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7948 delta=-0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:02.46 +25:00:24.0: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.54 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:02.46 +25:00:24.0: ref_mag=10.54 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9341 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:28.62 +29:51:03.1: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:24.63 +24:39:57.1: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:04:28.62 +29:51:03.1: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=11.5023 delta=3.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:12.88 +30:56:47.7: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:24.63 +24:39:57.1: ref_mag=10.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0420 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:12.88 +30:56:47.7: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:29:12.88 +30:56:47.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2794 delta=1.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:26.22 +26:25:27.5: 10.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:55.21 +25:03:43.3: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:26:50.27 +24:45:14.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:19.67 +26:24:49.6: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:26.22 +26:25:27.5: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.85 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:26.22 +26:25:27.5: ref_mag=10.85 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0213 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:55.21 +25:03:43.3: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.68 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:55.21 +25:03:43.3: ref_mag=10.68 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8875 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:59:31.48 +31:56:02.6: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:19.67 +26:24:49.6: 10.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.79 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:19.67 +26:24:49.6: ref_mag=10.79 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4757 delta=-0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:50.27 +24:45:14.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:50.27 +24:45:14.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:31.48 +31:56:02.6: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:59:31.48 +31:56:02.6: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8867 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:22:50.07 +30:19:49.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:17:34.02 +25:26:39.8: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:50.07 +30:19:49.2: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:22:50.07 +30:19:49.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4939 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:36.37 +28:05:44.2: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:34.02 +25:26:39.8: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:17:34.02 +25:26:39.8: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4884 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:36.37 +28:05:44.2: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:36.37 +28:05:44.2: ref_mag=10.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3427 delta=-0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:48.40 +30:50:08.4: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:48.40 +30:50:08.4: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:56:48.40 +30:50:08.4: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7773 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:15:28.52 +27:23:45.2: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:57.76 +31:24:27.1: 9.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:28.52 +27:23:45.2: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:15:28.52 +27:23:45.2: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2504 delta=1.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:57.76 +31:24:27.1: 9.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:09:57.76 +31:24:27.1: ref_mag=9.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.6969 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:50.56 +25:48:11.9: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:50.56 +25:48:11.9: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:50.56 +25:48:11.9: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8156 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:47.45 +29:32:52.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:34:17.17 +27:33:50.9: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:47.45 +29:32:52.9: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:49:47.45 +29:32:52.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7015 delta=1.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:17.17 +27:33:50.9: 10.67 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:34:17.17 +27:33:50.9: ref_mag=10.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0011 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out115105.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158400.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167008.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242910.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66618.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77282.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79040.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93431.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242163_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242163_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242164_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242164_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:08.62 +33:45:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.78 +32:31:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.07 +32:30:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242176_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242176_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.70 +32:34:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.98 +32:31:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:51.15 +26:53:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:57.77 +27:02:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:40.17 +25:53:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:20.48 +25:19:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:15.11 +26:11:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:51.43 +25:50:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:09.42 +24:32:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:25.53 +26:36:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:45.02 +25:37:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242217_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242217_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:03.24 +26:46:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242219_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242219_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:17.00 +24:40:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:17.25 +24:42:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.53 +27:16:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:41.86 +25:06:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:00.39 +24:30:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242237_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242237_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:32.71 +24:45:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242242_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242242_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242243_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242243_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242244_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242244_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:00.22 +24:56:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242252_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242252_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242255_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242255_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242256_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242256_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242258_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242258_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242264_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242264_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242265_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242265_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242267_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242267_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242273_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242273_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242278_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242278_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242280_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242280_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242289_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242289_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242291_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242291_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242294_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242294_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242295_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242295_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242297_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242297_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242303_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242303_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242306_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242306_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242307_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242307_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242308_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242308_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242312_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242312_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242317_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242317_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242319_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242319_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242323_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242323_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242324_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242324_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242326_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242326_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242336_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242336_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242341_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242341_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242347_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242347_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242351_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242351_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242353_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242353_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242355_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242355_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242356_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242356_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242363_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242363_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242365_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242365_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.27 +32:03:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242376_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242376_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242381_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242381_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242383_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242383_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242388_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242388_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242389_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242389_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242396_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242396_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242397_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242397_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242399_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242399_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242410_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242410_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242412_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242412_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242416_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242416_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242422_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242422_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242423_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242423_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242424_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242424_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242427_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 242427_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242432_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242432_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242435_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242435_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242443_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242443_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242452_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242452_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242453_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242453_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242454_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242454_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.46 +34:26:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242457_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242457_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242459_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242459_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242463_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242463_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242467_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242467_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242478_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242478_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242484_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242484_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242485_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242485_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242488_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242488_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242498_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242498_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242499_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242499_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242518_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242518_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242524_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242524_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242528_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242528_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242538_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242538_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242548_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242548_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242579_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242579_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242635_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242635_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.35 +27:56:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242668_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242668_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:17.75 +30:10:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.82 +28:29:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242734_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242734_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.67 +27:35:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242749_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242749_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242756_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242756_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.99 +32:35:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242781_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242781_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.69 +34:23:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242830_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242830_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.77 +33:00:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242862_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 242862_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.42 +31:39:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242910_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 242910_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157696_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 157696_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211142_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 211142_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 229008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:20.74 +25:08:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210705_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 210705_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.06 +28:29:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203463_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 203463_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.05 +32:03:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.86 +32:22:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188920_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 188920_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189852_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 189852_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205712_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 205712_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 163250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.16 +27:36:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93431_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 93431_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.07 +28:36:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.10 +31:35:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136831_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 136831_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.45 +25:17:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177663_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 177663_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.26 +27:29:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148145_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 148145_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
