This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.4389* 04 54 04.96 +22 30 36.6 6.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9389,6.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4389 6.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.4389* 04 09 04.15 +20 49 58.3 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9389,7.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4389 7.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.4389* 04 09 04.14 +20 49 58.5 7.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9389,7.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4389 7.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.4389* 04 54 04.96 +22 30 36.7 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9389,7.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4389 7.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4389 2461241.9389 12.06 05:04:16.21 +22:10:09.7
180.45486 -11.50441 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 0 0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:04:16.21 +22:10:09.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 05:04:16.21 +22:10:09.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.4389* 05 04 16.21 +22 10 09.7 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9389,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4389 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4389 2461241.9389 12.69 04:09:01.14 +25:36:21.3
169.31998 -18.98269 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 0 -1 1 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:09:01.14 +25:36:21.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:09:01.14 +25:36:21.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.4389* 04 09 01.14 +25 36 21.3 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9389,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4389 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4389 2461241.9389 13.25 04:27:07.76 +21:16:39.4
175.65857 -18.83807 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -0 -0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:07.76 +21:16:39.4: 16.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:27:07.76 +21:16:39.4: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.4389* 04 27 07.76 +21 16 39.4 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9389,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4389 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4389 2461241.9389 13.91 04:37:34.34 +19:54:17.9
178.41449 -17.83141 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.377 Campania -0 -1 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:34.34 +19:54:17.9: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:37:34.34 +19:54:17.9: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.4389* 04 37 34.34 +19 54 17.9 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9389,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4389 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.4389 2461241.9389 14.23 04:28:39.72 +19:51:34.1
177.04993 -19.48031 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla -0 1 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:39.72 +19:51:34.1: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:28:39.72 +19:51:34.1: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.4389* 04 28 39.72 +19 51 34.1 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.9389,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.4389 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461241.93924738 20.07.2026 10:32:20.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11311
Objects passed selection criteria: 11268
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8426.75
Average stars matched: 8208.75 (97.413 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119968 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 09:38:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461241.93924738 20.07.2026 10:32:20.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 58
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78860
Objects passed selection criteria: 78678
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59883
Average stars matched: 57854 (96.6117 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1927220 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 09:41:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461241.93861138
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.444 +22:00:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.444 +22:00:40.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.057 +22:00:02.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:36:56.057 +22:00:02.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0069 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:58.444 +22:00:40.78
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:56.057 +22:00:02.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01402 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vzUnRSvOmz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WgLMCSuX4K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6rq9ehgY8c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kDcu2SjBPX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5122 to 78.0896 deg, Dec +16.4863 to +27.2832 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5122 to 78.0896 deg, Dec 16.4863 to 27.2832 deg
Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.997000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.997000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5122 to 78.0896 deg, Dec +16.4863 to +27.2832 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5122 to 78.0896 deg, Dec 16.4863 to 27.2832 deg
Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 12023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5322 to 78.0896 deg, Dec +16.4883 to +27.2799 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5322 to 78.0896 deg, Dec 16.4883 to 27.2799 deg
Loaded 5164 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3942 out of 4310 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4310 out of 12023 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vzUnRSvOmz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=0, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=221 n_q2=225 n_q3=290 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WgLMCSuX4K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=981, bad_region=0, passed=12023
Got 12023 stars (including 11026 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12023 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=217 n_q2=228 n_q3=285 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6rq9ehgY8c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, bad_region=0, passed=4980
Got 4980 stars (including 4685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4980 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=234 n_q2=239 n_q3=232 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kDcu2SjBPX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=304, bad_region=0, passed=4983
Got 4983 stars (including 4673 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4983 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=234 n_q2=240 n_q3=232 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.223
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.210
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.162
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.198
reference average sigma_overall=0.3345 worst_q_ratio=1.2165
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 20747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.79 +24:18:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20749_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 20749_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20750_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 20750_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.444 +22:00:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.444 +22:00:40.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.057 +22:00:02.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:36:56.057 +22:00:02.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0069 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:58.444 +22:00:40.78
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:56.057 +22:00:02.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01402 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Uc9Ex4bYmH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FHyW3SoLYy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RtNgWakx7H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fSmLjqH52D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5077 to 78.1095 deg, Dec +16.4682 to +27.2856 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5077 to 78.1095 deg, Dec 16.4682 to 27.2856 deg
Loaded 5191 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3474 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.857050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.857050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5077 to 78.1095 deg, Dec +16.4682 to +27.2856 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5077 to 78.1095 deg, Dec 16.4682 to 27.2856 deg
Loaded 5191 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3474 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 85691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5078 to 78.1091 deg, Dec +16.4883 to +27.2975 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5078 to 78.1091 deg, Dec 16.4883 to 27.2975 deg
Loaded 5188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3464 out of 4347 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4347 out of 85691 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 58 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Uc9Ex4bYmH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=6242, bad_region=8, passed=86318
Got 86318 stars (including 79890 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=210 n_q2=218 n_q3=289 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FHyW3SoLYy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=6215, bad_region=8, passed=85672
Got 85672 stars (including 79297 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85672 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=213 n_q2=220 n_q3=279 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RtNgWakx7H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1177, bad_region=10, passed=34717
Got 34717 stars (including 33486 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34717 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=238 n_q2=232 n_q3=232 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fSmLjqH52D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1271, bad_region=14, passed=34476
Got 34476 stars (including 33140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=239 n_q2=236 n_q3=232 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053510_TTUQ1b1x1_2813852_kbRDFRZs/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:07.48 +23:57:37.7: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:09:51.80 +26:34:06.3: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:05:23.19 +22:14:14.5: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:36.77 +20:32:28.0: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:45.30 +19:28:44.4: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:04:16.21 +22:10:09.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:05:23.19 +22:14:14.5: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:23.19 +22:14:14.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9941 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:17:07.48 +23:57:37.7: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:07.48 +23:57:37.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2341 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:09:01.14 +25:36:21.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:09:51.80 +26:34:06.3: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:51.80 +26:34:06.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5960 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:14:36.77 +20:32:28.0: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:36.77 +20:32:28.0: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0825 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:21:45.30 +19:28:44.4: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:45.30 +19:28:44.4: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4178 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 05:04:16.21 +22:10:09.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:09:01.14 +25:36:21.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.87 +21:18:40.1: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:10.12 +24:08:07.7: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:07.76 +21:16:39.4: 16.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:48:48.87 +21:18:40.1: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.87 +21:18:40.1: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6438 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:44.32 +20:00:57.4: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:17.71 +27:01:11.6: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:17:10.12 +24:08:07.7: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:10.12 +24:08:07.7: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1434 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:27:07.76 +21:16:39.4: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:55:44.32 +20:00:57.4: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:44.32 +20:00:57.4: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0078 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:08:17.71 +27:01:11.6: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:17.71 +27:01:11.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4758 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:43.08 +22:12:48.6: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:15:34.61 +23:40:01.5: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:09.27 +24:01:34.1: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:17:43.08 +22:12:48.6: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:15:34.61 +23:40:01.5: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:43.08 +22:12:48.6: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7737 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:34.61 +23:40:01.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7811 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:19:09.27 +24:01:34.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:09.27 +24:01:34.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6821 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:34.34 +19:54:17.9: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:39.72 +19:51:34.1: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:37:34.34 +19:54:17.9: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:20.17 +22:32:13.9: 15.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:28:39.72 +19:51:34.1: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits at 04:35:20.17 +22:32:13.9: 15.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:35:20.17 +22:32:13.9: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1383 delta=1.42 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out104209.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103536.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103567.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103771.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104121.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104174.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103335_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103335_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:50.54 +21:05:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103336_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103336_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103346_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103346_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.43 +25:22:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103348_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103348_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103349_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103349_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103350_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103350_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.45 +22:04:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103351_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103351_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.08 +22:54:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103356_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103356_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.81 +24:18:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103358_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 103358_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103359_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 103359_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103429_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103429_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.66 +19:10:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103536_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 103536_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103544_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103544_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 103567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103610_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103610_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:09.72 +22:55:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103616_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103616_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.83 +26:54:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103618_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103618_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.16 +22:48:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103641_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103641_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.87 +18:26:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103642_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103642_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103671_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103671_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.47 +22:42:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103684_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103684_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:10.74 +22:49:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103710_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103710_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103730_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103730_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:47.84 +23:58:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:57.04 +23:57:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103771_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 103771_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103774_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103774_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103782_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103782_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.42 +24:25:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103793_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103793_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103807_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103807_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:32.63 +21:00:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103809_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103809_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:18.11 +23:01:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103834_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103834_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.73 +22:10:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103856_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103856_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:07.14 +24:00:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103857_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103857_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.44 +23:44:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103860_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103860_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:33.82 +25:48:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103872_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103872_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.35 +19:58:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103876_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103876_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:30.09 +23:18:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103877_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103877_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.00 +21:45:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103925_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103925_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.88 +21:31:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103928_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103928_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.43 +24:06:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103931_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103931_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:15.93 +24:10:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103941_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103941_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103946_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103946_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103962_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103962_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103976_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103976_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:39.05 +23:58:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103999_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 103999_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.62 +18:42:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104115_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 104115_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:58.70 +24:19:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104121_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 104121_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104174_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 104174_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104202_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 104202_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104209_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 104209_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:20.17 +22:32:13.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.816 145132927822383616 068.83425573809 +22.53730535945 13.9269 12.8652 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.816#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:39.92 +20:57:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36988_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 36988_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:31.89 +22:41:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67131_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 67131_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:39.38 +17:51:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 05458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.10 +26:08:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15632_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 15632_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:35.09 +25:01:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 58469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:47.08 +17:16:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74631_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 74631_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_05-32-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
