This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.3056* 21 34 06.38 -18 58 07.8 11.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.8056,11.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.3056 11.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.3056* 21 34 06.24 -18 58 05.8 11.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.8056,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.3056 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.3056 2461241.8056 13.12 21:06:06.45 -18:36:29.9
29.70842 -37.81351 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla -0 -0 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:06:06.45 -18:36:29.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:06:06.45 -18:36:29.9: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.3056* 21 06 06.45 -18 36 29.9 13.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.8056,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.3056 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.3056 2461241.8056 14.02 21:13:35.66 -14:04:50.0
35.87368 -37.78532 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1860 Barbarossa -1 -0 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:13:35.66 -14:04:50.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:13:35.66 -14:04:50.0: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.8056,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.3056 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.3056 2461241.8056 14.04 21:35:46.46 -21:29:23.2
29.08111 -45.33708 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.752 Sulamitis -1 -0 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:35:46.46 -21:29:23.2: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:35:46.46 -21:29:23.2: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.3056* 21 35 46.46 -21 29 23.2 14.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.8056,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.3056 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.3056 2461241.8056 14.11 21:07:56.15 -16:13:28.8
32.71200 -37.35821 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.569 Misa -0 1 1 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:56.15 -16:13:28.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:56.15 -16:13:28.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.3056* 21 07 56.15 -16 13 28.8 14.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.8056,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.3056 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.3056 2461241.8056 14.41 21:12:24.77 -17:44:51.7
31.40852 -38.91204 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.658 Asteria 0 -1 1 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:12:24.77 -17:44:51.7: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:12:24.77 -17:44:51.7: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.3056* 21 12 24.77 -17 44 51.7 14.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461241.8056,14.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260720.3056 14.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 20.3056 2461241.8056 12.74 21:38:23.85 -18:33:49.8
33.29146 -44.97908 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J213824-1833.8
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.470 V 13.812 V 2453562.02590 0.557498100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:38:23.85 -18:33:49.8: 13.66 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:38:23.85 -18:33:49.8: 13.84 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 20.3056* 21 38 23.85 -18 33 49.8 12.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J213824-1833.8,2461241.8056,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J213824-1833.8 20260720.3056 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461241.80593669 20.07.2026 07:20:22.930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5589
Objects passed selection criteria: 5588
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5423
Average stars matched: 5300.75 (97.7457 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 02:39:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461241.80593669 20.07.2026 07:20:22.930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 82
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39786
Objects passed selection criteria: 39677
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38377.2
Average stars matched: 37146.5 (96.793 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 145228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 20 02:42:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461241.80523574
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:59.492 -17:59:53.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:59.492 -17:59:53.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0050 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:56.340 -18:00:13.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:56.340 -18:00:13.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:59.492 -17:59:53.42
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:56.340 -18:00:13.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01370 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pcGcEkKqzS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ASw1oLZclE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WL7UIdwXv2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DVwOyvhE0F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.585450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.585450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Loaded 6814 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5032 out of 5155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5155 out of 7087 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pcGcEkKqzS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=463, bad_region=1472, passed=7063
Got 7063 stars (including 5203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=304 n_q2=177 n_q3=295 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ASw1oLZclE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=456, bad_region=1500, passed=7087
Got 7087 stars (including 5211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=301 n_q2=175 n_q3=301 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WL7UIdwXv2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, bad_region=1292, passed=6633
Got 6633 stars (including 4981 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=299 n_q2=169 n_q3=313 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DVwOyvhE0F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=437, bad_region=1262, passed=6567
Got 6567 stars (including 4947 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6567 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=304 n_q2=170 n_q3=307 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.255
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.284
new1=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new2=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits sigma_overall=0.414 worst_q_ratio=1.255
reference average sigma_overall=0.3855 worst_q_ratio=1.3025
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:08:21.71 -15:29:23.9: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:20.20 -19:43:49.5: 10.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:15:30.99 -17:03:21.7: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:08:21.71 -15:29:23.9: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:21.71 -15:29:23.9: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6643 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:20.20 -19:43:49.5: 10.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:20.20 -19:43:49.5: ref_mag=10.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1345 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:15:30.99 -17:03:21.7: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:30.99 -17:03:21.7: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7755 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20330_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20330_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20333_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20333_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:37.58 -16:10:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20335_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 20335_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20336_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20339_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20339_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:59.492 -17:59:53.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:59.492 -17:59:53.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0050 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:56.340 -18:00:13.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:56.340 -18:00:13.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:59.492 -17:59:53.42
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:56.340 -18:00:13.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01370 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5fkqG36BRJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RiSgNFwlT7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BDdCfIb1r1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OGMGhFI0AV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5427 out of 5892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5892 out of 47842 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.428400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.428400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 47842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5427 out of 5892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5892 out of 47842 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 47137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4995 deg, Dec -23.2703 to -12.6356 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4995 deg, Dec -23.2703 to -12.6356 deg
Loaded 6856 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5425 out of 5895 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5895 out of 47137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 47 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5fkqG36BRJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2135, bad_region=7409, passed=47826
Got 47826 stars (including 38586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47826 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=309 n_q2=179 n_q3=287 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RiSgNFwlT7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2107, bad_region=7307, passed=47124
Got 47124 stars (including 38008 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=307 n_q2=181 n_q3=288 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BDdCfIb1r1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1943, bad_region=7554, passed=44655
Got 44655 stars (including 35423 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44655 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=303 n_q2=180 n_q3=292 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OGMGhFI0AV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1983, bad_region=7600, passed=44863
Got 44863 stars (including 35512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=303 n_q2=181 n_q3=290 n_q4=178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-19-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-20_CI_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_023004_TTUQ2b1x1_1067667_xFoIfZdU/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:41.53 -13:52:22.9: 13.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:37:18.16 -16:16:01.2: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:34:15.86 -17:32:55.3: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:06:06.45 -18:36:29.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:13:57.20 -14:16:25.3: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:57.07 -14:32:41.0: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:31.83 -21:06:42.1: 14.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:31:50.35 -20:35:52.0: 14.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:35:12.73 -20:35:54.3: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:41.53 -13:52:22.9: 13.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:37:18.16 -16:16:01.2: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:06:06.45 -18:36:29.9: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:41.53 -13:52:22.9: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6478 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:31:50.35 -20:35:52.0: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:18.16 -16:16:01.2: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3913 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:50.35 -20:35:52.0: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0413 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:34:15.86 -17:32:55.3: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:31.83 -21:06:42.1: 14.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:57.07 -14:32:41.0: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:35:12.73 -20:35:54.3: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:13:57.20 -14:16:25.3: 14.19 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:34:15.86 -17:32:55.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3673 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:31.83 -21:06:42.1: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4915 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:57.07 -14:32:41.0: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3650 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:12.73 -20:35:54.3: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1493 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:57.20 -14:16:25.3: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3914 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:14.85 -20:43:19.1: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:09.16 -15:51:21.1: 14.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:13:35.66 -14:04:50.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:23.77 -14:30:33.4: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:35:40.05 -15:27:04.5: 13.84 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:12:11.16 -21:31:53.3: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:35:46.46 -21:29:23.2: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:56.15 -16:13:28.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:09.16 -15:51:21.1: 14.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:09.16 -15:51:21.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0081 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:14.85 -20:43:19.1: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:14.85 -20:43:19.1: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1736 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:35:40.05 -15:27:04.5: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:13:35.66 -14:04:50.0: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:23.77 -14:30:33.4: 14.59 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:35:46.46 -21:29:23.2: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:40.05 -15:27:04.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8144 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:12:11.16 -21:31:53.3: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:56.15 -16:13:28.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:23.77 -14:30:33.4: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1548 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:11.16 -21:31:53.3: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1785 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:36.74 -22:09:09.1: 14.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:54:13.92 -21:34:21.3: 14.83 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:35.71 -20:28:54.3: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:09:21.68 -21:56:05.9: 14.70 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:36:06.62 -21:28:09.3: 14.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:36.74 -22:09:09.1: 14.98 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:36.74 -22:09:09.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.2164 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:54:13.92 -21:34:21.3: 14.90 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:09:21.68 -21:56:05.9: 14.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:13.92 -21:34:21.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.3283 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:35.71 -20:28:54.3: 14.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:36:06.62 -21:28:09.3: 14.28 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:21.68 -21:56:05.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3196 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:35.71 -20:28:54.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3295 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:06.62 -21:28:09.3: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2852 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:32:04.40 -15:19:08.1: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:32:04.40 -15:19:08.1: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:32:11.09 -21:48:03.0: 14.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:04.40 -15:19:08.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1086 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:47.94 -13:48:42.9: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:32.73 -14:58:36.7: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:59:27.21 -20:42:01.4: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:37:02.57 -21:18:45.4: 14.87 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:32:11.09 -21:48:03.0: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:11.09 -21:48:03.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2669 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:47.94 -13:48:42.9: 14.68 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:32.73 -14:58:36.7: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:59:27.21 -20:42:01.4: 14.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:32.73 -14:58:36.7: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2039 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:47.94 -13:48:42.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3758 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:37:02.57 -21:18:45.4: 15.13 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:27.21 -20:42:01.4: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2872 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:02.57 -21:18:45.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.3133 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:04:28.85 -21:25:31.3: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:33:25.60 -20:05:40.5: 14.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:10.41 -15:33:22.6: 14.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:04:28.85 -21:25:31.3: 14.91 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:28:49.90 -16:56:52.0: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:55.96 -21:49:07.1: 14.69 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:20.79 -20:02:45.1: 14.86 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:28.85 -21:25:31.3: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3510 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:33:25.60 -20:05:40.5: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:25.60 -20:05:40.5: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4059 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:28:49.90 -16:56:52.0: 14.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:10.41 -15:33:22.6: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:55.96 -21:49:07.1: 14.83 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:20.79 -20:02:45.1: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:28:49.90 -16:56:52.0: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2500 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:10.41 -15:33:22.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2878 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:55.96 -21:49:07.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4612 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:20.79 -20:02:45.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4735 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:36:23.39 -21:25:22.0: 14.55 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:10:02.82 -20:02:26.2: 14.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:10.99 -20:31:44.0: 14.70 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:12:33.42 -21:58:30.5: 14.78 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:57.74 -16:36:19.8: 15.08 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:21:12.12 -21:50:00.1: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:36:23.39 -21:25:22.0: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:23.39 -21:25:22.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3985 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:10:02.82 -20:02:26.2: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:02.82 -20:02:26.2: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3445 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:10.99 -20:31:44.0: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:12:33.42 -21:58:30.5: 14.78 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:57.74 -16:36:19.8: 14.74 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:21:12.12 -21:50:00.1: 14.56 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:10.99 -20:31:44.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3678 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:33.42 -21:58:30.5: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5474 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:57.74 -16:36:19.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4782 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:12.12 -21:50:00.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4334 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:14.13 -16:26:19.5: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:12:24.77 -17:44:51.7: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:35:03.20 -21:47:34.6: 14.40 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:37:38.65 -14:21:38.8: 14.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:14.13 -16:26:19.5: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:14.13 -16:26:19.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4649 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:38:23.85 -18:33:49.8: 13.66 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:12:24.77 -17:44:51.7: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:35:03.20 -21:47:34.6: 14.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:37:38.65 -14:21:38.8: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:03.20 -21:47:34.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4550 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:38.65 -14:21:38.8: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4523 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:38:23.85 -18:33:49.8: 13.84 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:38:23.85 -18:33:49.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.7383 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53166.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53173.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53331.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53072_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53072_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53077_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53077_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53078_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53083_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53083_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53087_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53087_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53098_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53098_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53106_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53106_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53114_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53114_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53124_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53124_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53132_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53132_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53135_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53135_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53157_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53159_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53159_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53161_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53161_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53165_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53165_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53166_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53166_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53172_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53172_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53173_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53173_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53182_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53182_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53187_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53187_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53194_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53205_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53205_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53212_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53212_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53215_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53215_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53216_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53216_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53220_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53220_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53225_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53225_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53226_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53226_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53227_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53227_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53233_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53233_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53244_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53244_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53245_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53245_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53249_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53249_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53270_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53270_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53277_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53277_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53281_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53281_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53291_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53291_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53293_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53299_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53299_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53303_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53303_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53306_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53306_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53307_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53307_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53331_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 53331_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53335_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53372_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 53372_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19707_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 19707_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-20-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
