This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4073 2461239.9073 11.85 22:56:40.14 -07:41:30.4
63.16449 -56.58605 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.5 Astraea -0 -0 0 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:56:40.14 -07:41:30.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:56:40.14 -07:41:30.4: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9073,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4073 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4073 2461239.9073 12.87 23:15:37.00 -11:52:57.0
62.40231 -62.84663 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.117 Lomia -1 0 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:15:37.00 -11:52:57.0: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:15:37.00 -11:52:57.0: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9073,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4073 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4073 2461239.9073 13.32 22:52:04.30 -08:29:13.5
60.76448 -56.18338 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.78 Diana -1 1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:52:04.30 -08:29:13.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:52:04.30 -08:29:13.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9073,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4073 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4073 2461239.9073 13.87 22:58:24.72 -09:11:53.4
61.47717 -57.85918 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.303 Josephina -1 1 1 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:58:24.72 -09:11:53.4: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:58:24.72 -09:11:53.4: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9073,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4073 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4073 2461239.9073 13.86 23:12:08.41 -06:32:13.4
69.53769 -58.69484 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.208 Lacrimosa -0 1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:12:08.41 -06:32:13.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:12:08.41 -06:32:13.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9073,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4073 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.4073 2461239.9073 14.32 22:47:52.24 -09:31:32.9
58.16440 -55.96168 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1331 Solvejg -2 1 2 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:47:52.24 -09:31:32.9: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:47:52.24 -09:31:32.9: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.9073,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.4073 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.89052953 18.06.2026 09:22:11.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
First image: 2461209.89052953 18.06.2026 09:22:11.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Last image: 2461239.90775758 18.07.2026 09:47:00.255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3779
Objects passed selection criteria: 3779
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3673
Average stars matched: 3587 (97.6586 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113788 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 07:38:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.89052953 18.06.2026 09:22:11.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
First image: 2461209.89052953 18.06.2026 09:22:11.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Last image: 2461239.90775758 18.07.2026 09:47:00.255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 119
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22308
Objects passed selection criteria: 22248
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21641
Average stars matched: 20664.8 (95.4889 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 129840 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 07:41:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461239.90693089
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:28.596 -09:55:34.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43
Second-epoch image center 23:08:28.596 -09:55:34.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0729 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:27.488 -09:55:59.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43
Second-epoch image center 23:08:27.488 -09:55:59.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0683 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:28.596 -09:55:34.41
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:27.488 -09:55:59.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00825 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vGPIQDHcEU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sVOfbaA5se
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aUZAT3QJJr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ymq40q7PYT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4809 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1115 to 355.2218 deg, Dec -15.2530 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1115 to 355.2218 deg, Dec -15.2530 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 4649 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3506 out of 3569 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3569 out of 4809 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.595350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.595350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4809 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1115 to 355.2218 deg, Dec -15.2530 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1115 to 355.2218 deg, Dec -15.2530 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 4649 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3506 out of 3569 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3569 out of 4809 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 4861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1114 to 355.2213 deg, Dec -15.2485 to -4.6432 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1114 to 355.2213 deg, Dec -15.2485 to -4.6432 deg
Loaded 4652 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3553 out of 3609 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3609 out of 4861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.4 pix Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
14.6 mag. Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vGPIQDHcEU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=1049, passed=4809
Got 4809 stars (including 3512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4809 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=312 n_q2=164 n_q3=299 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.046
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sVOfbaA5se (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=284, bad_region=1045, passed=4861
Got 4861 stars (including 3580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=315 n_q2=161 n_q3=300 n_q4=178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aUZAT3QJJr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, bad_region=1014, passed=4623
Got 4623 stars (including 3360 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4623 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 374 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 374 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=318 n_q2=162 n_q3=298 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ymq40q7PYT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=296, bad_region=979, passed=4559
Got 4559 stars (including 3339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 374 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 374 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=316 n_q2=162 n_q3=298 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.046
ref2=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.117
new1=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits sigma_overall=0.447 worst_q_ratio=1.049
new2=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.102
reference average sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.0815
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:28.596 -09:55:34.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43
Second-epoch image center 23:08:28.596 -09:55:34.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0729 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:27.488 -09:55:59.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.599 -09:59:41.43
Second-epoch image center 23:08:27.488 -09:55:59.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0683 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:28.596 -09:55:34.41
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:27.488 -09:55:59.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00825 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hPRWMwi2LV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DmJQjmt2WJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F8VQeH14Bc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o0eIAZK5yZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 25197 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1001 to 355.2316 deg, Dec -15.2607 to -4.6369 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1001 to 355.2316 deg, Dec -15.2607 to -4.6369 deg
Loaded 4666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3834 out of 4035 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4035 out of 25197 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.465850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.465850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 25197 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1001 to 355.2316 deg, Dec -15.2607 to -4.6369 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1001 to 355.2316 deg, Dec -15.2607 to -4.6369 deg
Loaded 4666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3834 out of 4035 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4035 out of 25197 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 25267 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.0906 to 355.2333 deg, Dec -15.2571 to -4.6359 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.0906 to 355.2333 deg, Dec -15.2571 to -4.6359 deg
Loaded 4672 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3838 out of 4043 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4043 out of 25267 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.3 pix Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
14.8 mag. Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hPRWMwi2LV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=916, bad_region=3821, passed=25190
Got 25190 stars (including 20633 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=301 n_q2=167 n_q3=297 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DmJQjmt2WJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=918, bad_region=3879, passed=25263
Got 25263 stars (including 20670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25263 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=301 n_q2=165 n_q3=295 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F8VQeH14Bc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1017, bad_region=4635, passed=26937
Got 26937 stars (including 21456 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26937 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 374 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 374 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=309 n_q2=174 n_q3=290 n_q4=179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o0eIAZK5yZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=928, bad_region=4666, passed=26792
Got 26792 stars (including 21364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=309 n_q2=172 n_q3=289 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-45-48_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_044734_TTUQ2b1x1_113913_J4q8uel1/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:53:57.93 -11:24:19.4: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:23:15.19 -13:29:53.6: 14.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:56:40.14 -07:41:30.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:13:24.54 -06:48:27.5: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:59:13.59 -09:18:39.5: 14.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:46:21.09 -09:13:34.0: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:10:22.34 -11:37:09.6: 13.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:50:21.61 -09:15:28.8: 13.90 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:53:57.93 -11:24:19.4: 13.99 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:53:57.93 -11:24:19.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2104 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:23:15.19 -13:29:53.6: 14.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:50:21.61 -09:15:28.8: 13.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:15:20.73 -14:00:02.4: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:10:22.34 -11:37:09.6: 13.99 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:59:13.59 -09:18:39.5: 14.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:13:24.54 -06:48:27.5: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:10:22.34 -11:37:09.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0408 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:15.19 -13:29:53.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2626 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:56:40.14 -07:41:30.4: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:50:21.61 -09:15:28.8: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1118 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:46:21.09 -09:13:34.0: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:59:13.59 -09:18:39.5: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2049 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:13:24.54 -06:48:27.5: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0432 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:21.09 -09:13:34.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7052 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:15:20.73 -14:00:02.4: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:20.73 -14:00:02.4: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9423 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:15:37.00 -11:52:57.0: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:46:22.22 -09:42:59.2: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:15:37.00 -11:52:57.0: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:52:04.30 -08:29:13.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:46:22.22 -09:42:59.2: 13.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:22.22 -09:42:59.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3193 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:52:04.30 -08:29:13.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:58:24.72 -09:11:53.4: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:12:08.41 -06:32:13.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:58:24.72 -09:11:53.4: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:51:15.99 -08:17:07.9: 13.84 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:26:49.27 -13:56:27.0: 14.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:12:08.41 -06:32:13.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:51:15.99 -08:17:07.9: 13.94 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:26:49.27 -13:56:27.0: 14.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:51:15.99 -08:17:07.9: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8551 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:49.27 -13:56:27.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9521 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:20:39.99 -14:05:20.3: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:45:38.09 -12:48:20.8: 14.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:46:30.10 -10:56:49.3: 14.09 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:20:39.99 -14:05:20.3: 14.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:45:38.09 -12:48:20.8: 14.79 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:39.99 -14:05:20.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1327 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:38.09 -12:48:20.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2165 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:46:30.10 -10:56:49.3: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:30.10 -10:56:49.3: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1750 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:40:58.22 -07:33:02.7: 14.74 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:40:58.22 -07:33:02.7: 14.94 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:58.22 -07:33:02.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.1544 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:52:36.93 -12:02:47.3: 14.21 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:58:20.99 -10:52:46.0: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:26:39.38 -13:46:15.1: 14.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:52:36.93 -12:02:47.3: 14.26 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:52:36.93 -12:02:47.3: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0245 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:26:39.38 -13:46:15.1: 14.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:58:20.99 -10:52:46.0: 14.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:39.38 -13:46:15.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2202 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:58:20.99 -10:52:46.0: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2229 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:47:16.54 -13:11:56.9: 14.63 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:43:22.27 -11:58:36.5: 14.69 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:47:16.54 -13:11:56.9: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:47:16.54 -13:11:56.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2754 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:43:22.27 -11:58:36.5: 14.66 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:22.27 -11:58:36.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3557 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:47:52.24 -09:31:32.9: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:24:53.89 -11:35:02.3: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:16:13.53 -13:01:47.8: 14.55 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:47:52.24 -09:31:32.9: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:24:53.89 -11:35:02.3: 14.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:53.89 -11:35:02.3: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1939 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:16:13.53 -13:01:47.8: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:16:13.53 -13:01:47.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4014 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:54:58.91 -13:59:05.8: 14.77 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:52:38.17 -13:41:51.6: 14.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:20:21.83 -12:46:42.5: 14.74 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:54:58.91 -13:59:05.8: 14.79 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:54:58.91 -13:59:05.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3772 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:21:42.93 -13:05:50.6: 14.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:52:38.17 -13:41:51.6: 14.69 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:52:38.17 -13:41:51.6: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2774 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:20:21.83 -12:46:42.5: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:21.83 -12:46:42.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2910 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:21:42.93 -13:05:50.6: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:42.93 -13:05:50.6: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3148 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 22:45:19.07 -05:46:02.2: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:23:49.66 -14:02:59.9: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:25:26.18 -06:08:55.6: 14.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 22:45:19.07 -05:46:02.2: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:19.07 -05:46:02.2: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3525 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:23:35.66 -12:47:28.2: 14.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:23:49.66 -14:02:59.9: 14.56 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:49.66 -14:02:59.9: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.4163 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:25:26.18 -06:08:55.6: 14.18 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:26.18 -06:08:55.6: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2337 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:21:34.79 -08:13:40.9: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-22-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0390.fits at 23:19:59.77 -08:03:14.8: 15.01 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:23:35.66 -12:47:28.2: 14.80 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:35.66 -12:47:28.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3692 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:21:34.79 -08:13:40.9: 14.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:34.79 -08:13:40.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3846 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_04-23-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 23:19:59.77 -08:03:14.8: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:19:59.77 -08:03:14.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4791 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31669.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31781.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31802.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31587_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31587_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31588_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31588_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31590_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31590_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31591_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31591_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31596_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31596_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31597_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31597_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31600_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31600_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31611_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31611_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31618_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31618_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31623_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 31623_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31625_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31625_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31627_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31627_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31632_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31632_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:53:25.05 -11:35:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31634_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31634_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31639_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31639_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31656_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31656_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31669_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 31669_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31676_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31676_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31681_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31681_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31687_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31687_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31693_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31693_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31696_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31696_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31698_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31698_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31701_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31701_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:25:19.21 -08:18:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31705_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 31705_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31708_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31708_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31732_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31732_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31738_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31738_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31740_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31740_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31741_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31741_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31759_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31759_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31772_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31772_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31773_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31773_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31779_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31779_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31781_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 31781_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31782_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31782_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31789_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31789_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31802_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 31802_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31803_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31803_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31804_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31804_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31806_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31806_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31807_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31807_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31829_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31829_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31830_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31830_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31836_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31836_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31842_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31842_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31844_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31844_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31851_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31851_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31862_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31862_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31871_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31871_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31888_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31888_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31890_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31890_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31897_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31897_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31899_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31899_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31906_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 31906_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31920_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31920_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31928_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31928_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31931_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31931_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31936_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31936_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31946_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31946_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31952_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31952_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31955_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31955_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31963_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31963_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31966_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31966_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31972_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31972_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31974_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 31974_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32005_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 32005_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32006_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 32006_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32012_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 32012_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32019_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 32019_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32021_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344
The candidate 32021_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_04-47-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0344 did not pass the final checks
