This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.3107 2461239.8107 11.20 20:52:18.07 -12:03:43.9
35.53554 -32.22826 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys -0 0 0 11.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:52:18.07 -12:03:43.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:52:18.07 -12:03:43.9: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.8107,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.3107 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.3107 2461239.8107 12.20 20:06:45.69 -14:07:49.5
28.28864 -22.94791 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix 0 -0 0 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:06:45.69 -14:07:49.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:06:45.69 -14:07:49.5: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.8107,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.3107 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.3107 2461239.8107 13.80 20:35:11.37 -07:18:31.6
38.35030 -26.36728 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.872 Holda -1 -1 2 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:35:11.37 -07:18:31.6: 15.21 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:35:11.37 -07:18:31.6: 15.33 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.8107,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.3107 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.3107 2461239.8107 10.48 20:26:06.90 -07:03:39.4
37.47784 -24.24465 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J202607-0703.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.630 V Y 0.520 V 2452091.70100 50.367683000000 M5/6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:26:06.90 -07:03:39.4: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:26:06.90 -07:03:39.4: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J202607-0703.7,2461239.8107,10.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J202607-0703.7 20260718.3107 10.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.88180116 17.06.2026 09:09:37.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
First image: 2461208.88180116 17.06.2026 09:09:37.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Last image: 2461239.81104481 18.07.2026 07:27:44.272 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12558
Objects passed selection criteria: 12550
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11630
Average stars matched: 11371 (97.773 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 04:13:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.88180116 17.06.2026 09:09:37.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
First image: 2461208.88180116 17.06.2026 09:09:37.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Last image: 2461239.81104481 18.07.2026 07:27:44.272 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 101
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 82 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 85145
Objects passed selection criteria: 84960
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 74826
Average stars matched: 72475.5 (96.8587 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1878628 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 04:20:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461239.81039706
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.330 -10:00:26.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:09.594 -10:03:00.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.330 -10:00:26.36
Second-epoch image center 20:34:09.594 -10:03:00.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:08.496 -10:03:39.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.330 -10:00:26.36
Second-epoch image center 20:34:08.496 -10:03:39.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0625 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:09.594 -10:03:00.70
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:08.496 -10:03:39.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01166 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits &> /tmp/tmp.znwJo9sFey
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IIwkJlZhHI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z89UT9gh9o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hbe5XHmKMm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13160 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5091 to 316.6566 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.7002 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5091 to 316.6566 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.7002 deg
Loaded 9295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7604 out of 7930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7930 out of 13160 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.724950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.724950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13160 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5091 to 316.6566 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.7002 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5091 to 316.6566 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.7002 deg
Loaded 9295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7604 out of 7930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7930 out of 13160 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 12091 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5231 to 316.6565 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5231 to 316.6565 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9282 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7429 out of 7730 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7730 out of 12091 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.znwJo9sFey (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=796, bad_region=0, passed=13160
Got 13160 stars (including 12348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13160 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.534 n_q1=223 n_q2=234 n_q3=250 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.395
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IIwkJlZhHI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=754, bad_region=0, passed=12091
Got 12091 stars (including 11329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12091 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.556 n_q1=233 n_q2=229 n_q3=244 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z89UT9gh9o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=456, bad_region=0, passed=11098
Got 11098 stars (including 10634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11098 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=216 n_q2=191 n_q3=281 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.308
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hbe5XHmKMm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=10475
Got 10475 stars (including 10039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=216 n_q2=183 n_q3=286 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits sigma_overall=0.441 worst_q_ratio=1.395
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.495 worst_q_ratio=1.402
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.308
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.347
reference average sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.3985
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-26-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022831_TTUQ1b1x1_3996327_iimYK19n/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:18:25.13 -05:42:21.5: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:05:12.16 -10:18:29.8: 10.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:03:53.37 -09:05:29.0: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:29:27.69 -09:30:04.1: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:26:20.93 -06:08:27.0: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:52:18.07 -12:03:43.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:17:31.36 -06:58:44.0: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:05:12.16 -10:18:29.8: 10.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:18:25.13 -05:42:21.5: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:12.16 -10:18:29.8: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9336 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:52:18.07 -12:03:43.9: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:29:27.69 -09:30:04.1: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:17:31.36 -06:58:44.0: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:03:53.37 -09:05:29.0: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:55:54.61 -11:52:08.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:50:19.36 -09:05:08.7: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:26:20.93 -06:08:27.0: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:25.13 -05:42:21.5: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1285 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:27.69 -09:30:04.1: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0003 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:31.36 -06:58:44.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0777 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:53.37 -09:05:29.0: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0919 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.93 -06:08:27.0: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2903 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:50:19.36 -09:05:08.7: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:19.36 -09:05:08.7: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1174 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:55:54.61 -11:52:08.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:54.61 -11:52:08.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9490 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20348_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20349_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20509_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20509_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.52 -06:36:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 20529_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20604_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:02.49 -10:33:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20697_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20697_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20707_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20707_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.28 -13:18:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20711_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20711_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20717_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20717_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20760_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20760_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20807_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20807_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04176_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 04176_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109591_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109591_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109614_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109614_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109617_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109617_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109619_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109619_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109621_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109621_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109622_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109622_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109624_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109624_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109627_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109627_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109638_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109638_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109639_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109639_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109641_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109641_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109643_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109643_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109644_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109644_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109662_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109662_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109672_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109672_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109673_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109673_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109674_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109674_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109675_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109675_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109676_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109676_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109853_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109853_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:18.06 -12:03:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110162_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 110162_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110419_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110419_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:13.29 -13:47:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110591_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110591_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110663_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110663_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:28.06 -06:01:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110684_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110684_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.65 -06:23:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110752_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110752_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110770_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110770_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110801_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110801_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.39 -14:46:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110812_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110812_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110843_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110843_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110943_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110943_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110969_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110969_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110986_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110986_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111008_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111008_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111148_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111148_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111186_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111186_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.90 -12:46:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111221_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 111221_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111260_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111260_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111274_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111274_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111306_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111306_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111320_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111320_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111368_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111368_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111374_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111374_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111396_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111396_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111424_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111424_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111437_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111437_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111458_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111458_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111463_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111463_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:14.16 -05:48:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111465_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111465_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111471_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111471_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111481_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111481_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111483_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111483_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111509_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111509_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111531_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111531_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111539_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111539_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111565_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111565_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111592_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111592_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111602_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111602_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111613_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111613_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111617_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111617_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111625_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111625_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111652_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111652_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111667_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111667_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111681_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111681_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111694_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111694_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111699_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111699_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111712_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111712_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111728_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111728_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111756_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111756_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111758_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111758_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111775_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111775_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111797_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111797_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17550_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 17550_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:53.18 -12:49:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13155_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 13155_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.31 -13:18:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25629_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 25629_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:58.10 -11:49:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63349_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 63349_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.53 -06:36:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13463_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 13463_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.66 -13:15:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64116_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 64116_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37600_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 37600_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-18_02-27-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks