This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2903 2461239.7903 11.26 20:52:19.09 -12:03:34.7
35.54033 -32.23097 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys -0 -0 1 11.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:52:19.09 -12:03:34.7: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:52:19.09 -12:03:34.7: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7903,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2903 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2903 2461239.7903 11.95 20:06:46.68 -14:07:45.2
28.29158 -22.95109 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix -1 -1 1 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:06:46.68 -14:07:45.2: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:06:46.68 -14:07:45.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7903,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2903 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2903 2461239.7903 13.72 20:09:55.89 -13:24:17.7
29.34953 -23.35697 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.190 Ismene -2 1 2 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:09:55.89 -13:24:17.7: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:09:55.89 -13:24:17.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 18.2903* 20 09 55.89 -13 24 17.7 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7903,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2903 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2903 2461239.7903 13.28 20:34:47.27 -10:11:50.0
35.39004 -27.54685 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -2 -1 2 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:34:47.27 -10:11:50.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:34:47.27 -10:11:50.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 18.2903* 20 34 47.27 -10 11 50.0 13.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.7903,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.2903 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.2903 2461239.7903 12.53 20:11:03.37 -13:18:56.8
29.55988 -23.57039 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ST Cap
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.300 V < 15.500 V 2454607.00000 266.670000000000 M6IIIe
The object was found in astcheck.6943 Moretto 412 -216 465 17.2 0 0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:11:03.37 -13:18:56.8: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:11:03.37 -13:18:56.8: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 18.2903* 20 11 03.37 -13 18 56.8 12.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ST Cap,2461239.7903,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ST Cap 20260718.2903 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.88180116 17.06.2026 09:09:37.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
First image: 2461208.88180116 17.06.2026 09:09:37.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Last image: 2461239.79051497 18.07.2026 06:58:10.493 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9307
Objects passed selection criteria: 9285
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7522.25
Average stars matched: 7444.25 (98.9631 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119916 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 06:45:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.88180116 17.06.2026 09:09:37.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
First image: 2461208.88180116 17.06.2026 09:09:37.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Last image: 2461239.79051497 18.07.2026 06:58:10.493 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 64
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 68 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 72469
Objects passed selection criteria: 72344
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 62017
Average stars matched: 60349 (97.3104 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1866160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 18 06:50:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461239.79001098
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.330 -10:00:26.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.059 -09:59:51.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.330 -10:00:26.36
Second-epoch image center 20:34:18.059 -09:59:51.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0119 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:15.443 -09:59:39.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.330 -10:00:26.36
Second-epoch image center 20:34:15.443 -09:59:39.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0136 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:18.059 -09:59:51.85
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:15.443 -09:59:39.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01130 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hmKPKjRpcZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9rrqpTg6MD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0T1efWDpov
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Js4fqlXTuk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13160 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5091 to 316.6566 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.7002 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5091 to 316.6566 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.7002 deg
Loaded 9295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7604 out of 7930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7930 out of 13160 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.718450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.718450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13160 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5091 to 316.6566 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.7002 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5091 to 316.6566 deg, Dec -15.2733 to -4.7002 deg
Loaded 9295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7604 out of 7930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7930 out of 13160 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 12091 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5231 to 316.6565 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5231 to 316.6565 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9282 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7429 out of 7730 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7730 out of 12091 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hmKPKjRpcZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=796, bad_region=2659, passed=13160
Got 13160 stars (including 9830 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13160 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=280 n_q2=166 n_q3=322 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9rrqpTg6MD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=754, bad_region=2472, passed=12091
Got 12091 stars (including 8992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12091 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=285 n_q2=165 n_q3=317 n_q4=185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.052
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0T1efWDpov (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=361, bad_region=1089, passed=6419
Got 6419 stars (including 5002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=333 n_q2=140 n_q3=359 n_q4=124 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Js4fqlXTuk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, bad_region=983, passed=5833
Got 5833 stars (including 4574 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5833 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=354 n_q2=145 n_q3=337 n_q4=121 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.039
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.089
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.052
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.448 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.039
reference average sigma_overall=0.4075 worst_q_ratio=1.0705
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:52:19.09 -12:03:34.7: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:26:20.98 -06:08:27.2: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:52:19.09 -12:03:34.7: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:26:20.98 -06:08:27.2: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.98 -06:08:27.2: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0574 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20303.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20293_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 20293_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20303_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 20303_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:52:19.09 -12:03:34.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.330 -10:00:26.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.059 -09:59:51.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.330 -10:00:26.36
Second-epoch image center 20:34:18.059 -09:59:51.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0119 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:15.443 -09:59:39.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.330 -10:00:26.36
Second-epoch image center 20:34:15.443 -09:59:39.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0136 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:18.059 -09:59:51.85
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:15.443 -09:59:39.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01130 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hqfg9m2YgW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Yub0Da7SIQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3YKjbRvata
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tkSmmcceta
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 93134 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5064 to 316.6638 deg, Dec -15.2734 to -4.6930 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5064 to 316.6638 deg, Dec -15.2734 to -4.6930 deg
Loaded 9310 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7143 out of 8314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8314 out of 93134 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.568300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.568300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 93134 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5064 to 316.6638 deg, Dec -15.2734 to -4.6930 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5064 to 316.6638 deg, Dec -15.2734 to -4.6930 deg
Loaded 9310 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7143 out of 8314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8314 out of 93134 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 89020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5072 to 316.6698 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5072 to 316.6698 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6939 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7242 out of 8299 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8299 out of 89020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
2.1 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hqfg9m2YgW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=6565, bad_region=12706, passed=93126
Got 93126 stars (including 74561 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 93126 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=296 n_q2=168 n_q3=299 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Yub0Da7SIQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=5830, bad_region=11458, passed=89003
Got 89003 stars (including 72504 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89003 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=302 n_q2=166 n_q3=293 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3YKjbRvata (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2663, bad_region=5709, passed=54312
Got 54312 stars (including 46241 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.436 n_q1=339 n_q2=139 n_q3=350 n_q4=128 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tkSmmcceta (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2181, bad_region=5295, passed=48619
Got 48619 stars (including 41417 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=354 n_q2=141 n_q3=336 n_q4=125 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-57-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_021647_TTUQ2b1x1_3760323_CJNF9Uit/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:21:14.14 -13:10:29.9: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:20:50.73 -06:29:36.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:42:56.79 -09:27:21.7: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:30:02.14 -09:49:14.9: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:08:43.03 -07:15:35.4: 14.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:13:43.45 -06:15:39.3: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:06:57.09 -06:01:53.7: 13.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:12:02.78 -12:44:26.4: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:14:52.99 -05:54:45.6: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:43:00.07 -10:50:57.6: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:21:14.14 -13:10:29.9: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:08:43.03 -07:15:35.4: 14.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:42:56.79 -09:27:21.7: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:30:02.14 -09:49:14.9: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:14.14 -13:10:29.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0416 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:43.03 -07:15:35.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0989 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:56.79 -09:27:21.7: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0035 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:02.14 -09:49:14.9: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0471 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:12:02.78 -12:44:26.4: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:20:50.73 -06:29:36.9: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:13:43.45 -06:15:39.3: 14.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:06:57.09 -06:01:53.7: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:02.78 -12:44:26.4: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0629 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:14:52.99 -05:54:45.6: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.73 -06:29:36.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0009 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:57.09 -06:01:53.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8064 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:43.45 -06:15:39.3: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8895 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:52.99 -05:54:45.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4479 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:43:00.07 -10:50:57.6: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:00.07 -10:50:57.6: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5678 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:06:46.68 -14:07:45.2: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:20:45.77 -07:45:59.2: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:17:58.93 -10:36:17.1: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:14:48.45 -10:54:55.8: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:26:20.97 -06:08:27.3: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:28:21.27 -13:08:20.0: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:11:41.43 -13:28:26.2: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:16:07.77 -07:36:14.2: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:22:24.23 -12:54:22.3: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:35:27.96 -12:56:35.4: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:20:45.77 -07:45:59.2: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:06:46.68 -14:07:45.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:45.77 -07:45:59.2: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9759 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:14:48.45 -10:54:55.8: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:26:20.97 -06:08:27.3: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:48.45 -10:54:55.8: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8520 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.97 -06:08:27.3: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1295 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:28:21.27 -13:08:20.0: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:21.27 -13:08:20.0: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6096 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:17:58.93 -10:36:17.1: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:11:41.43 -13:28:26.2: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:58.93 -10:36:17.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1757 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:41.43 -13:28:26.2: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3216 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:16:07.77 -07:36:14.2: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:07.77 -07:36:14.2: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4710 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:22:24.23 -12:54:22.3: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:35:27.96 -12:56:35.4: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:24.23 -12:54:22.3: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1383 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:27.96 -12:56:35.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1225 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:34:44.94 -06:15:58.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:34:29.11 -05:51:00.6: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:33:14.04 -10:08:24.3: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:09:55.89 -13:24:17.7: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:34:47.27 -10:11:50.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:15:13.01 -06:08:47.8: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:11:17.81 -07:43:09.8: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:21:10.56 -05:59:10.4: 15.30 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:34:44.94 -06:15:58.5: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:33:14.04 -10:08:24.3: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:44.94 -06:15:58.5: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2036 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:34:29.11 -05:51:00.6: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:14.04 -10:08:24.3: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3619 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.11 -05:51:00.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1177 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:09:55.89 -13:24:17.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:34:47.27 -10:11:50.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-09-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:11:03.37 -13:18:56.8: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:15:13.01 -06:08:47.8: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:13.01 -06:08:47.8: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6775 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:21:10.56 -05:59:10.4: 15.47 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:11:17.81 -07:43:09.8: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:21:10.56 -05:59:10.4: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.3140 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:17.81 -07:43:09.8: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7976 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:11:03.37 -13:18:56.8: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:11:03.37 -13:18:56.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5208 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109507.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109180.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109088_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109088_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109095_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109095_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109115_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109115_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109130_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109130_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109133_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109133_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109134_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109134_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:04.75 -09:32:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109136_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109136_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109139_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109139_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109143_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109143_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109144_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109144_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109149_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109149_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109154_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109154_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109156_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109156_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109176_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109176_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:19.07 -12:03:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109180_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 109180_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109196_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109196_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109200_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109200_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109213_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109213_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:28.14 -06:01:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109220_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109220_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109228_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109228_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109235_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109235_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109239_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109239_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109249_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109249_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109255_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109255_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109256_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109256_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109263_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109263_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109271_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109271_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:46.52 -12:45:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109276_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 109276_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109278_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 109278_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109279_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109279_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109283_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109283_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109507_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 109507_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:10.56 -05:59:10.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.725 4217995542119387008 305.29445641273 -05.98637586137 14.7123 14.1941 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.725#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13155_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 13155_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17550_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 17550_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_01-58-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks