NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-11-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits
Field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-11-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-11-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-11-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 261344 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 261344 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

renamed 'UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 447.2624 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8816 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1130.9846 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 406.8561 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1132.7984 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 405.7786 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.52868 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-17T23:48:10.2097540' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-18T04:48:10.2097540' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61239.2001181599 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-18T04:48:20.1132738' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61239.2002327894 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.99646956395 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 46.0000298393912 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.14 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 309.304722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.26072453294798 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29495 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29495 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.801264 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits :) Spent 1.016614 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-17T23:49:01.4046995' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-18T04:49:01.4046995' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61239.2007106943 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-18T04:49:11.3063023' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61239.200825301 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.996469617028 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 46.0000298471157 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.0002777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 309.369444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.27190440509883 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29495 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29495 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.801264 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits :) Spent 0.957553 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits


fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461239.70023390 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits' wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.837 +45:59:59.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:08.794 +46:01:59.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.837 +45:59:59.29 Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.794 +46:01:59.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0423 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:11.642 +46:02:09.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.837 +45:59:59.29 Second-epoch image center 12:00:11.642 +46:02:09.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:08.794 +46:01:59.68 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:11.642 +46:02:09.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00872 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qal2FK4Qh0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7oFvHHvoPb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F8Tuc1uK9O Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ki8D9fMlQU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6301 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.3599 to 191.9186 deg, Dec +39.8325 to +51.3845 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.3599 to 191.9186 deg, Dec 39.8325 to 51.3845 deg Loaded 3925 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2803 out of 2953 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2953 out of 6301 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.930500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.930500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6301 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.3599 to 191.9186 deg, Dec +39.8325 to +51.3845 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.3599 to 191.9186 deg, Dec 39.8325 to 51.3845 deg Loaded 3925 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2803 out of 2953 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2953 out of 6301 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 6312 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.3598 to 191.9184 deg, Dec +39.8325 to +51.3981 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.3598 to 191.9184 deg, Dec 39.8325 to 51.3981 deg Loaded 3933 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2811 out of 2957 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2957 out of 6312 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits 2.2 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 2.7 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 2.7 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Qal2FK4Qh0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=403, bad_region=0, passed=6301 Got 6301 stars (including 5895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6301 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6275 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6275 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6275 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=242 n_q2=225 n_q3=256 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.7oFvHHvoPb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=397, bad_region=0, passed=6312 Got 6312 stars (including 5911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6312 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6276 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6277 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6277 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=241 n_q2=231 n_q3=254 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.F8Tuc1uK9O (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=170, bad_region=0, passed=4148 Got 4148 stars (including 3973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4148 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4092 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4092 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4092 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=225 n_q2=249 n_q3=246 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Ki8D9fMlQU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=171, bad_region=0, passed=4092 Got 4092 stars (including 3919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4092 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4042 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=228 n_q2=249 n_q3=243 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.139 ref2=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.181 new1=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.316 worst_q_ratio=1.146 new2=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.223 reference average sigma_overall=0.3865 worst_q_ratio=1.16 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.837 +45:59:59.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:08.794 +46:01:59.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.837 +45:59:59.29 Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.794 +46:01:59.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0423 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:11.642 +46:02:09.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.837 +45:59:59.29 Second-epoch image center 12:00:11.642 +46:02:09.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:08.794 +46:01:59.68 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:11.642 +46:02:09.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00872 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iXIRIRx0qQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ykEN2FwB0S Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RORWhOG5K6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WG3yA5sUoe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 30420 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.2436 to 191.9186 deg, Dec +39.8325 to +51.3966 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.2436 to 191.9186 deg, Dec 39.8325 to 51.3966 deg Loaded 3950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2677 out of 2956 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2956 out of 30420 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 30420 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.2436 to 191.9186 deg, Dec +39.8325 to +51.3966 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.2436 to 191.9186 deg, Dec 39.8325 to 51.3966 deg Loaded 3950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2677 out of 2956 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2956 out of 30420 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits (aperture=5.2) Read 30576 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.2106 to 191.9184 deg, Dec +39.8325 to +51.4129 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.2106 to 191.9184 deg, Dec 39.8325 to 51.4129 deg Loaded 3967 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2682 out of 2960 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2960 out of 30576 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits 2.1 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.iXIRIRx0qQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1238, bad_region=12, passed=30396 Got 30396 stars (including 29099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30396 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=251 n_q2=228 n_q3=249 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ykEN2FwB0S (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1202, bad_region=10, passed=30553 Got 30553 stars (including 29289 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30553 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30438 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30438 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30438 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=254 n_q2=230 n_q3=247 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.RORWhOG5K6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=507, bad_region=32, passed=20391 Got 20391 stars (including 19819 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20391 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20160 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20160 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=229 n_q2=240 n_q3=248 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.WG3yA5sUoe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=512, bad_region=32, passed=20404 Got 20404 stars (including 19835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20404 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20168 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20166 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20166 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=232 n_q2=240 n_q3=246 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 12:16:21.12 +40:51:24.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 11:39:20.57 +46:30:48.1: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 12:28:17.87 +47:11:17.2: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 12:27:14.89 +49:54:26.0: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 12:19:53.66 +43:36:53.0: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:16:21.12 +40:51:24.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:16:21.12 +40:51:24.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 11:39:20.57 +46:30:48.1: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:39:20.57 +46:30:48.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6375 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:19:53.66 +43:36:53.0: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:19:53.66 +43:36:53.0: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9318 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:28:17.87 +47:11:17.2: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:27:14.89 +49:54:26.0: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:17.87 +47:11:17.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6699 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:14.89 +49:54:26.0: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3331 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 12:29:14.58 +48:06:48.7: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 11:37:11.91 +41:41:47.0: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:29:14.58 +48:06:48.7: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:14.58 +48:06:48.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7926 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 11:37:11.91 +41:41:47.0: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:11.91 +41:41:47.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7529 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 11:33:30.61 +44:26:40.8: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 12:36:27.34 +48:42:00.4: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 11:33:30.61 +44:26:40.8: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:30.61 +44:26:40.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8605 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:36:27.34 +48:42:00.4: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:36:27.34 +48:42:00.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0511 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 12:01:31.76 +43:31:13.0: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-59-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0307.fits at 12:22:56.65 +43:48:48.8: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:01:31.76 +43:31:13.0: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:01:31.76 +43:31:13.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2193 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:22:56.65 +43:48:48.8: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:56.65 +43:48:48.8: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2163 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52073_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52073_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    14.30    12:27:14.84 +49:54:27.8   2312 0578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.38    12:27:14.93 +49:54:24.1   2316 0581   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52077_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52077_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    13.63    11:39:20.56 +46:30:44.3   6962 2970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.65    11:39:20.58 +46:30:51.9   6967 2970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52080_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52080_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    13.59    12:28:17.93 +47:11:17.2   1963 2191   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.80    12:28:17.81 +47:11:17.3   1968 2194   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52081_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52081_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.12    12:15:51.77 +47:05:50.8   3230 2417   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 12:15:51.67 +47:05:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52141_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52141_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    10.57    12:16:21.12 +40:51:24.3   2745 6159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    10.62    12:16:21.11 +40:51:24.6   2750 6162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52192_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52192_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    11.35    11:53:28.94 +48:31:17.9   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52225_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52225_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    11.72    12:19:34.42 +49:00:00.4   2992 1232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 12:19:34.43 +49:00:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52251_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52251_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    11.93    12:19:53.70 +43:36:53.3   2551 4452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    11.93    12:19:53.62 +43:36:52.7   2556 4454   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52336_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52336_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    12.27    11:54:27.87 +50:58:21.7   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52353_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52353_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    12.28    11:37:32.92 +44:41:52.9   7163 4065   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 11:37:32.94 +44:41:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52355_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52355_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    12.35    11:59:34.20 +48:51:17.0   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52386_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52386_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    12.25    11:16:46.06 +49:26:51.0   9202 1093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 11:16:46.06 +49:26:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52410_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52410_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    12.42    11:27:04.51 +48:55:50.7   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52459_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52459_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    12.69    11:23:17.37 +48:28:58.9   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52482_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52482_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    12.73    11:20:39.57 +45:00:35.7   8979 3816   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 11:20:39.55 +45:00:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52589_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52589_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.46    11:18:01.28 +47:27:38.0   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52648_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52648_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.31    11:34:27.33 +48:51:28.2   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52695_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52695_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.47    12:03:24.63 +51:03:12.2   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52698_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52698_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.36    12:02:08.18 +51:07:54.2   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52792_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52792_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.49    11:53:04.82 +48:40:54.3   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52828_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52828_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    13.79    12:29:14.55 +48:06:48.7   1952 1623   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.79    12:29:14.60 +48:06:48.7   1957 1625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52852_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52852_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.72    12:27:29.91 +41:22:42.3   1525 5689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 12:27:29.96 +41:22:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52892_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52892_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.63    11:28:58.39 +48:14:39.8   8012 1901   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 11:28:58.37 +48:14:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52905_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52905_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.82    12:07:00.73 +42:38:43.5   3907 5180   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 12:07:00.84 +42:38:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52906_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52906_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    13.75    11:37:11.85 +41:41:47.0   7215 5883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.75    11:37:11.98 +41:41:47.1   7220 5884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52910_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52910_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.97    11:34:48.18 +48:28:27.5   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52928_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52928_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.93    11:37:20.08 +46:07:33.8   7178 3203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 11:37:20.04 +46:07:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52932_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52932_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.79    12:35:20.97 +50:07:49.4   1554 0313   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 12:35:20.97 +50:07:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52943_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52943_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.38    11:28:29.74 +48:32:51.0   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52963_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52963_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.53    11:34:51.71 +46:35:06.9   7433 2922   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 11:34:51.68 +46:35:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52983_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52983_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.01    12:14:14.29 +50:45:29.0   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53010_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53010_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    13.86    11:33:30.57 +44:26:41.3   7596 4211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.86    11:33:30.64 +44:26:40.3   7601 4213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53017_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53017_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.96    11:58:03.66 +48:03:21.7   5079 1994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 11:58:03.59 +48:03:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53022_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53022_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.55    11:25:48.94 +49:23:16.2   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53042_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53042_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    14.14    12:36:27.45 +48:41:58.9   1290 1148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.99    12:36:27.23 +48:42:02.0   1295 1151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53087_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53087_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.98    11:23:57.42 +49:31:00.9   8483 1103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53145_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53145_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.12    11:51:43.74 +48:34:37.8   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53169_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53169_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.34    12:05:44.02 +49:42:28.1   4389 0947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53170_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53170_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.51    12:25:44.78 +50:05:21.4   2477 0493   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53171_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53171_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    14.23    12:22:56.81 +43:48:50.2   2235 4290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.20    12:22:56.49 +43:48:47.3   2241 4293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53209_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53209_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 18.20023    2461239.70023    14.22    12:01:31.84 +43:31:12.0   4543 4696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-48-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.22    12:01:31.68 +43:31:14.1   4549 4698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53266_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53266_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    13.90    11:31:54.61 +48:33:14.1   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53297_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53297_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.14    11:35:56.45 +49:29:11.8   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53328_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53328_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.04    11:31:24.23 +49:51:41.3   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53334_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53334_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.07    11:18:41.49 +50:21:28.6   8973 0554   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53340_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53340_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.48    11:58:29.97 +49:53:42.7   5099 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53359_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53359_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.63    12:12:30.69 +50:40:11.9   3789 0305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53368_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53368_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.63    12:42:35.44 +47:46:20.7   0575 1586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53403_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53403_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.47    11:32:12.38 +50:30:19.3   7652 0540   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53410_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53410_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.67    11:34:54.81 +50:10:10.5   7393 0752   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53414_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53414_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.74    11:53:04.30 +48:11:52.1   5584 1932   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53434_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53434_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    14.85    11:48:26.04 +47:29:35.9   6038 2371   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 17242_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 17242_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 18.20083    2461239.70083    11.88    12:15:51.32 +47:06:19.3   3231 2413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_235151_TTUQ1b1x1_1915695_9eh1SLxp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 12:15:51.33 +47:06:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-11-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461239.70023390 -observatory V36 07:12:41.30 +17:30:26.3 Mercury (4.0mag) 10:43:48.21 +09:07:32.6 Venus (-4.2mag) 04:47:26.27 +22:17:54.9 Mars (1.3mag) 08:23:49.50 +19:48:24.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:31.33 +03:22:19.4 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:08:40.18 +20:48:54.6 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:55.72 +00:19:37.0 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:30:10.74 -23:21:27.5 Pluto (14.4mag) 11:03:37.40 +03:34:18.8 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 18 02:28 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461239.70023390: 08:23:47.57 +19:48:31.5 Io (6.0mag) 08:24:00.80 +19:47:41.3 Europa (6.3mag) 08:24:06.09 +19:47:19.4 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:23:23.30 +19:50:05.9 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:22:00.46 +19:36:05.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:23:50.37 +19:48:22.1 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:21:21.47 +19:38:50.5 Elara (17.7mag) 08:27:35.19 +19:38:24.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:28:19.94 +19:54:41.0 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:41.77 +03:22:26.0 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:31.54 +03:22:29.2 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:55:56.81 +03:20:10.4 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:18.11 +03:22:11.1 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:21.56 +03:18:24.8 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 18 02:28 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461239.70023390: 17:59:06.52 -31:06:40.0 JWST 16:05:00.20 +51:31:21.3 Chandra 20:06:57.50 +24:20:24.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 18 02:28 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461239.70023390 -observatory V36 02:47:13.88 +15:19:56.5 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:12:12.25 -34:32:31.6 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:33:30.10 -68:17:01.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:03:29.05 +32:35:00.9 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:27:51.00 +21:09:40.5 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:54:33.68 +32:13:32.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:21:15.44 +26:50:51.9 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:02:25.28 +29:25:38.1 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:14:50.62 +05:07:55.7 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:02.89 -11:34:59.6 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:39:22.01 +67:29:11.0 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:16:18.68 -10:53:22.8 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:14:29.67 +66:08:43.0 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:42:56.80 +30:23:28.5 14.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:12:49.95 +15:29:57.9 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:31:05.27 +40:48:14.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:38:58.07 +47:07:23.6 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:56:57.62 -13:28:17.2 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:40:57.32 +27:45:28.5 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:19:36.81 -13:37:41.1 16.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:05:24.76 +22:04:52.6 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:47:29.92 +03:34:41.2 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:31:13.53 +79:07:51.2 17.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:54:02.89 +45:33:45.2 16.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:30:43.16 +05:51:16.7 17.0mag A/2026 E1 21:31:03.25 -18:05:13.8 7.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:17:16.39 -02:14:28.9 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:11:21.59 +30:23:26.2 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:24:26.06 +11:29:44.4 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:51:22.22 -05:02:47.5 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:46:18.85 +20:31:26.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:34:34.12 +11:38:11.5 16.4mag 88P/Howell 06:58:35.72 +29:59:20.3 15.8mag 93P/Lovas 04:46:40.13 +31:19:46.8 16.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:27:51.61 +29:46:31.4 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:02:52.40 -01:59:29.1 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:04:16.23 +21:00:32.0 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:50:57.20 +19:36:52.4 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:41:29.72 +15:16:26.0 16.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:20:16.75 -20:45:20.1 15.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:01:23.21 +35:29:05.1 15.5mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:39:36.26 +20:27:29.2 14.1mag 169P/NEAT 01:59:25.18 +08:24:04.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:32.49 -08:44:24.7 17.2mag 235P/LINEAR 09:01:41.92 +32:32:55.4 18.0mag 240P/NEAT 20:38:00.09 -51:07:53.7 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:21:25.22 +15:45:34.1 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 06:01:08.57 +37:22:56.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:33.28 +05:19:53.9 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:41:41.28 +19:20:57.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:04:01.26 +38:33:29.1 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 18 02:28 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 2026-07-16.17 17.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 18 02:27 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 18 02:27 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 21:35:24.753 -14:51:35.01 AT 2026svz 2026-06-27.33 22.2271 20:31:55.032 -25:17:26.05 AT 2026svy 2026-06-27.32 22.425 23:12:03.386 -07:08:51.16 AT 2026svx 2026-06-27.43 22.3341 21:38:52.469 -09:12:08.16 AT 2026svw 2026-06-27.33 20.826 21:24:07.399 -08:10:48.32 AT 2026svv 2026-06-27.34 22.9964 20:42:22.608 -20:56:09.99 AT 2026svu 2026-06-27.32 22.8033 22:49:29.419 -09:52:21.90 AT 2026svt 2026-06-27.41 23.2399 23:08:56.975 -10:56:50.31 AT 2026svs 2026-06-27.42 23.0562 23:03:48.038 -10:42:20.17 AT 2026svr 2026-06-27.42 23.1156 21:05:20.116 -12:39:02.09 AT 2026svq 2026-06-27.30 22.4649 04:03:37.997 -49:14:19.96 AT 2026svp 2026-06-26.43 23.1019 21:42:26.450 -12:30:39.78 AT 2026svo 2026-06-26.41 23.1202 22:23:57.549 -05:26:28.43 AT 2026svn 2026-06-26.40 23.0846 21:59:30.646 -08:36:23.43 AT 2026svm 2026-06-26.41 23.0458 00:40:45.913 -42:36:08.06 AT 2026svl 2026-06-26.42 23.627 22:01:49.708 -02:28:35.92 AT 2026svk 2026-06-26.41 22.3804 22:26:37.642 -04:12:59.57 AT 2026svj 2026-06-26.40 22.8575 21:46:45.471 -13:57:34.56 AT 2026svi 2026-06-26.41 22.7499 21:42:08.217 -14:29:27.43 AT 2026svh 2026-06-26.41 23.2705 21:57:43.950 -02:48:28.98 AT 2026svg 2026-06-26.41 21.5213 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Jul 18 02:27 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C