This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.1300 2461239.6300 9.11 19:05:33.20 -22:21:48.7
14.21862 -12.95309 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 1 -0 1 9.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:33.20 -22:21:48.7: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:05:33.20 -22:21:48.7: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.6300,9.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.1300 9.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.1300 2461239.6300 11.22 19:01:01.98 -27:56:59.2
8.53632 -14.27779 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 1 1 1 11.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:01.98 -27:56:59.2: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:01:01.98 -27:56:59.2: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.6300,11.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.1300 11.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.1300 2461239.6300 11.61 18:40:46.83 -27:40:04.0
6.90380 -10.08406 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides 0 -0 0 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:46.83 -27:40:04.0: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:40:46.83 -27:40:04.0: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.6300,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.1300 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.1300 2461239.6300 11.37 19:09:51.79 -30:00:26.7
7.34142 -16.85415 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 1 1 1 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:51.79 -30:00:26.7: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:09:51.79 -30:00:26.7: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.6300,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.1300 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.1300 2461239.6300 12.28 19:38:56.86 -21:52:45.0
17.85904 -19.87108 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa 1 0 1 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:38:56.86 -21:52:45.0: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:38:56.86 -21:52:45.0: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.6300,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.1300 12.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.1300 2461239.6300 12.66 18:39:40.35 -28:54:39.2
5.65637 -10.39700 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa 1 -0 1 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:39:40.35 -28:54:39.2: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:39:40.35 -28:54:39.2: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.6300,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.1300 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.1300 2461239.6300 13.31 19:23:16.31 -22:45:23.2
15.54116 -16.85873 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.468 Lina 2 2 2 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:23:16.31 -22:45:23.2: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:23:16.31 -22:45:23.2: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.6300,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.1300 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.1300 2461239.6300 13.40 19:08:03.44 -26:33:25.3
10.49686 -15.16165 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2013 Tucapel 1 1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:03.44 -26:33:25.3: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:03.44 -26:33:25.3: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.6300,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.1300 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 18.1300 2461239.6300 12.62 18:53:06.40 -24:26:50.9
11.06650 -11.22206 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 1 1 2 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:06.40 -24:26:50.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:53:06.40 -24:26:50.9: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461239.6300,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260718.1300 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461239.63034937 18.07.2026 03:07:32.186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9809
Objects passed selection criteria: 9782
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8243.25
Average stars matched: 8166.25 (99.0659 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 17 22:14:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461239.63034937 18.07.2026 03:07:32.186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 168
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 67 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 111744
Objects passed selection criteria: 111562
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 99217.2
Average stars matched: 97652.8 (98.4232 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1901252 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 17 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-157-gbf7d0e63
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-17)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 17 22:18:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461239.62968406
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Image size: 943.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:03.390 -26:00:12.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:03.390 -26:00:12.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0119 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Image size: 943.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.005 -26:00:11.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.005 -26:00:11.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:03.390 -26:00:12.73
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:01.005 -26:00:11.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00894 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fC5wCzGvJW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3n7JFPKkD5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MhJOCzbidR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VUqIkUCJR1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.554850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.554850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13383 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7396 out of 7628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7628 out of 9734 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fC5wCzGvJW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=0, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=250 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3n7JFPKkD5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=677, bad_region=0, passed=9734
Got 9734 stars (including 9047 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.623 n_q1=243 n_q2=199 n_q3=234 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MhJOCzbidR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=376, bad_region=0, passed=5053
Got 5053 stars (including 4665 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5053 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013107 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010486 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.753 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.521 n_q1=262 n_q2=134 n_q3=293 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VUqIkUCJR1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, bad_region=0, passed=5159
Got 5159 stars (including 4757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5159 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.678 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.496 n_q1=266 n_q2=135 n_q3=295 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.277
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.593 worst_q_ratio=1.188
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.551 worst_q_ratio=1.365
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.555 worst_q_ratio=1.223
reference average sigma_overall=0.584 worst_q_ratio=1.2325
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:33.20 -22:21:48.7: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:05:33.20 -22:21:48.7: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20093.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20093_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 20093_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.89 -30:28:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20168_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20168_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:50.06 -20:59:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20190_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20190_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.24 -22:42:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20252_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20252_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.14 -28:37:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.41 -22:34:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20019_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20019_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.84 -23:56:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20018_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20018_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.69 -29:04:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20010_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20010_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.62 -26:20:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.06 -28:51:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:05:33.20 -22:21:48.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Image size: 943.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:03.390 -26:00:12.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:03.390 -26:00:12.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0119 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Image size: 943.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.005 -26:00:11.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.005 -26:00:11.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:03.390 -26:00:12.73
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:01.005 -26:00:11.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00894 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z67F2qGN5L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Sgj68RO9d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LUnAKoZO8M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.886UUHWTLG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.361800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.361800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 111498 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13436 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9982 out of 11636 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11636 out of 111498 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 154 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z67F2qGN5L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=0, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0Sgj68RO9d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=8357, bad_region=1, passed=111486
Got 111486 stars (including 102963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111486 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.750 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.585 n_q1=260 n_q2=213 n_q3=199 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LUnAKoZO8M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3092, bad_region=2, passed=69558
Got 69558 stars (including 66347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69558 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013107 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010486 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.938 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.536 n_q1=275 n_q2=140 n_q3=269 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.575
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.886UUHWTLG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3250, bad_region=1, passed=73381
Got 73381 stars (including 70010 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73381 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=276 n_q2=143 n_q3=272 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-06-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220926_TTUQ1b1x1_385725_Y1OXv4Gk/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:09.54 -26:09:47.5: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:38.79 -23:41:46.4: 13.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:47.38 -25:06:07.8: 13.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:40.74 -24:12:14.0: 13.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:43.79 -27:15:15.7: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:29.90 -25:44:46.4: 13.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:38:47.54 -26:43:43.3: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:58.50 -25:39:48.7: 13.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:09.54 -26:09:47.5: 13.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:47.38 -25:06:07.8: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:09.54 -26:09:47.5: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3759 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:38:47.54 -26:43:43.3: 13.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:47.38 -25:06:07.8: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1716 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:45:29.90 -25:44:46.4: 13.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:41:40.74 -24:12:14.0: 13.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:07:43.79 -27:15:15.7: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:38:47.54 -26:43:43.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3276 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:38.79 -23:41:46.4: 13.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:29.90 -25:44:46.4: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3511 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:40.74 -24:12:14.0: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5874 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:43.79 -27:15:15.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1575 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:38.79 -23:41:46.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5752 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:47.15 -24:08:27.4: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:59.37 -21:57:35.4: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:46:58.50 -25:39:48.7: 13.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:58.50 -25:39:48.7: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1496 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:03:47.15 -24:08:27.4: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:47.15 -24:08:27.4: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0167 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:59.37 -21:57:35.4: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:59.37 -21:57:35.4: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9395 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:47.93 -25:06:43.1: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:46.58 -21:34:12.3: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:56.02 -20:47:53.6: 12.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:21:30.70 -22:31:04.0: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:11.28 -29:40:37.7: 12.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:00:47.93 -25:06:43.1: 12.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:47.93 -25:06:43.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0536 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:50:46.58 -21:34:12.3: 12.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:07:11.28 -29:40:37.7: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:55:56.02 -20:47:53.6: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:21:30.70 -22:31:04.0: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:46.58 -21:34:12.3: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1381 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:11.28 -29:40:37.7: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6962 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:56.02 -20:47:53.6: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1477 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:30.70 -22:31:04.0: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7239 delta=-0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:56.01 -28:40:44.4: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:01.04 -28:16:43.4: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:24.94 -23:14:51.5: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:31.00 -27:10:09.8: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:03:56.01 -28:40:44.4: 12.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:56.01 -28:40:44.4: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5022 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:01.04 -28:16:43.4: 12.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:01.04 -28:16:43.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6521 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:32.62 -23:25:11.4: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:13.04 -22:04:48.2: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:06:24.94 -23:14:51.5: 12.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:24.94 -23:14:51.5: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5652 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:01:31.00 -27:10:09.8: 12.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:31.00 -27:10:09.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4972 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:40:32.62 -23:25:11.4: 12.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:32.62 -23:25:11.4: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7670 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:09:13.04 -22:04:48.2: 12.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:13.04 -22:04:48.2: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5299 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:01.98 -27:56:59.2: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:46.83 -27:40:04.0: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:51.79 -30:00:26.7: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:34.18 -27:29:49.2: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:01:01.98 -27:56:59.2: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:40:46.83 -27:40:04.0: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:09:51.79 -30:00:26.7: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:34.18 -27:29:49.2: 11.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:28.77 -21:36:59.0: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:34.18 -27:29:49.2: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6636 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:38:56.86 -21:52:45.0: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:07:28.77 -21:36:59.0: 12.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:28.77 -21:36:59.0: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4337 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:39:40.35 -28:54:39.2: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:38:56.86 -21:52:45.0: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:07.81 -28:31:10.7: 12.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:39:40.35 -28:54:39.2: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:00.81 -23:00:48.0: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:42:07.81 -28:31:10.7: 12.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:07.81 -28:31:10.7: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7239 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:49.29 -24:26:02.7: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:47:00.81 -23:00:48.0: 12.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:00.81 -23:00:48.0: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9477 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:49.41 -23:32:42.1: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:49.29 -24:26:02.7: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:49.29 -24:26:02.7: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6318 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:44:49.41 -23:32:42.1: 12.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:49.41 -23:32:42.1: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8956 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:02.58 -28:08:05.2: 12.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:02.58 -28:08:05.2: 12.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:02.58 -28:08:05.2: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7222 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:37:25.71 -28:16:38.0: 12.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:37:25.71 -28:16:38.0: 12.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:37:25.71 -28:16:38.0: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9796 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:49.35 -25:03:32.2: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:27.26 -20:44:06.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:44.61 -25:35:55.5: 13.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:49.35 -25:03:32.2: 13.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:49.35 -25:03:32.2: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0665 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:57.20 -29:20:02.9: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:00:27.26 -20:44:06.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:27.26 -20:44:06.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:49:44.61 -25:35:55.5: 13.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:44.61 -25:35:55.5: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1889 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:43:57.20 -29:20:02.9: 12.69 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:57.20 -29:20:02.9: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8905 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:35.96 -23:14:23.0: 12.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:43.12 -23:04:27.4: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:39.51 -24:08:07.1: 12.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:48:35.96 -23:14:23.0: 13.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:35.96 -23:14:23.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1841 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:20:43.12 -23:04:27.4: 12.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:43.12 -23:04:27.4: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9453 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:40:39.51 -24:08:07.1: 12.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:39.51 -24:08:07.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2771 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:44.55 -22:33:42.0: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:34.00 -20:45:51.9: 14.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:03.81 -20:43:48.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:13:44.55 -22:33:42.0: 13.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:44.55 -22:33:42.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0553 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:44:34.00 -20:45:51.9: 13.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:34.00 -20:45:51.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5918 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:00:03.81 -20:43:48.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:03.81 -20:43:48.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:23:16.31 -22:45:23.2: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:27.82 -26:07:18.8: 13.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:03.44 -26:33:25.3: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:33.73 -23:13:20.9: 13.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:23:16.31 -22:45:23.2: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:28.98 -26:08:10.6: 14.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:44:27.82 -26:07:18.8: 13.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:27.82 -26:07:18.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7037 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:03.44 -26:33:25.3: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:54:33.73 -23:13:20.9: 13.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:33.73 -23:13:20.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7557 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:55:28.98 -26:08:10.6: 14.70 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:28.98 -26:08:10.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8855 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:06.40 -24:26:50.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:53:06.40 -24:26:50.9: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159922.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159997.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161148.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158853_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158853_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158854_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158854_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:52.28 -24:16:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158858_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158858_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158873_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158873_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158880_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158880_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158883_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158883_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158890_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158890_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158896_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158896_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:08.54 -26:30:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158903_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158903_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:05.32 -23:39:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158907_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158907_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158909_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158909_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:32.88 -20:54:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158911_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158911_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:17.66 -22:04:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158912_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158912_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158914_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158914_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158918_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158918_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158919_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158919_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158920_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158920_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:03.80 -22:50:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158921_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158921_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:21.14 -21:29:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158922_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158922_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158923_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158923_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158926_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158926_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158927_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158927_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:49.07 -29:57:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158928_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158928_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:34.85 -24:35:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158931_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158931_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:11.34 -23:48:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158936_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158936_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:50.37 -30:15:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158937_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158937_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:27.79 -21:22:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158939_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158939_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158940_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158940_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158942_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158942_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158945_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158945_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158947_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158947_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:14.03 -30:10:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158950_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158950_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158951_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158951_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158952_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158952_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158956_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158956_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:17.03 -22:08:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158957_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158957_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:12.32 -29:40:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158958_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158958_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158959_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158959_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:03.99 -24:14:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158960_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158960_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:00.80 -27:44:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158962_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158962_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:29.37 -27:30:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158963_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158963_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:56.20 -28:39:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158964_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158964_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:43.76 -24:40:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158966_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158966_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:51.99 -27:50:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158967_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158967_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:38.78 -28:45:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158970_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158970_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:59.82 -29:41:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158990_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158990_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:33.19 -22:21:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159137_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159137_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:33.87 -20:55:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159249_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159249_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159297_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159297_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159383_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159383_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159489_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159489_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:45.73 -24:25:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159542_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159542_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.96 -22:23:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159678_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159678_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:39.82 -21:39:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159679_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159679_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.63 -24:07:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159682_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159682_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.68 -22:17:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159730_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159730_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:12.49 -24:52:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159761_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159761_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.52 -23:54:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159814_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159814_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:24.25 -28:14:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159832_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159832_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:16.31 -24:20:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159840_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159840_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159860_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159860_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:35.62 -21:30:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159887_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159887_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:30.48 -25:48:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159895_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159895_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:05.04 -24:22:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159919_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159919_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:14.28 -24:02:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159922_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159922_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159953_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159953_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:43.97 -27:03:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159994_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159994_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.64 -23:13:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159997_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159997_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160011_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160011_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:46.38 -21:25:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160033_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160033_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.64 -26:43:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160068_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160068_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:42.18 -22:09:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160074_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160074_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:40.51 -29:09:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160090_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160090_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160092_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160092_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:24.81 -23:15:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160097_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160097_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:52.03 -23:46:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160101_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160101_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.77 -22:42:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160145_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160145_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160149_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160149_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:21.70 -21:14:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160173_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160173_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:42.36 -26:56:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160181_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160181_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160186_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160186_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160222_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160222_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:16.45 -22:24:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160230_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160230_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:07.75 -31:01:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160236_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160236_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.37 -23:10:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160285_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160285_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160301_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160301_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:27.41 -21:19:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160333_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160333_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:38.80 -21:52:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:37.99 -21:14:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:41.43 -24:58:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160405_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160405_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160463_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160463_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:37.43 -25:02:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160466_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160466_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:07.41 -26:28:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160540_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160540_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:08.69 -29:30:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160556_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160556_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160572_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160572_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:40.22 -22:06:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160593_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160593_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160625_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160625_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160643_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160643_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160660_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160660_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:07.67 -21:05:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.93 -25:29:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160679_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160679_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:39.42 -25:18:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160683_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160683_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160731_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160731_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160733_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160733_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160740_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160740_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:01.47 -21:02:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160768_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160768_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.41 -27:20:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:10.29 -27:42:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160839_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160839_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:39.66 -25:49:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160852_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160852_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:25.31 -27:13:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160857_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160857_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:29.31 -22:20:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160859_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160859_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160905_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160905_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.67 -27:38:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160910_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160910_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160920_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160920_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160970_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160970_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:50.03 -22:29:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160972_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160972_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:44.53 -24:21:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160994_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160994_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:40.60 -22:32:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160996_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160996_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:09.30 -23:24:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161061_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161061_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:57.39 -27:18:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161146_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161146_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.94 -23:20:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161148_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 161148_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161208_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161208_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:22.10 -25:14:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161213_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 161213_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161231_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161231_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161244_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161244_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.57 -23:48:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157429_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157429_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.04 -27:20:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.83 -25:10:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 12242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.17 -29:54:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.57 -23:19:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.69 -29:04:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90213_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 90213_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03697_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 03697_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:29.02 -30:55:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51402_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 51402_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.75 -26:56:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156652_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156652_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:06.02 -28:00:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156482_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156482_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.52 -23:55:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156477_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156477_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.26 -26:25:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156387_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156387_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.20 -28:37:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:46.95 -23:43:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 26547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:08.95 -28:46:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143752_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 143752_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:27.19 -20:55:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.48 -27:50:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.41 -22:34:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136535_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 136535_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.42 -23:36:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.12 -28:51:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136869_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 136869_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:44.41 -23:42:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39042_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 39042_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:20.43 -27:49:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49206_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 49206_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:44.73 -27:19:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.19 -25:35:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98259_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 98259_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_22-07-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
