This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 12.03 04:47:21.04 +30:47:52.0
171.15906 -9.23700 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 0 -0 0 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:47:21.04 +30:47:52.0: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:47:21.04 +30:47:52.0: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461238.9194,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260717.4194 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 13.55 04:42:48.89 +30:04:53.1
171.08472 -10.44679 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis -2 -1 2 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:42:48.89 +30:04:53.1: 15.90 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:42:48.89 +30:04:53.1: 16.07 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.97 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.4194* 04 42 48.89 +30 04 53.1 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461238.9194,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260717.4194 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 13.90 04:31:43.85 +28:28:16.7
170.72098 -13.32897 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:31:43.85 +28:28:16.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:31:43.85 +28:28:16.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:31:43.85 +28:28:16.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.4194* 04 31 43.85 +28 28 16.7 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461238.9194,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260717.4194 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 12.43 05:33:11.61 +32:11:11.6
175.82464 -0.53242 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 0.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ZTF J053311.62+321111.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.767 g Y 0.333 g 2458344.83890 95.736103800000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:11.61 +32:11:11.6: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:11.61 +32:11:11.6: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J053311.62+321111.5,2461238.9194,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J053311.62+321111.5 20260717.4194 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 13.26 04:53:57.03 +27:28:00.3
174.71065 -10.19493 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 0.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J045357.01+272758.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.430 V 14.870 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:53:57.03 +27:28:00.3: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:53:57.03 +27:28:00.3: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.4194* 04 53 57.03 +27 28 00.3 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J045357.01+272758.7,2461238.9194,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J045357.01+272758.7 20260717.4194 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 10.24 05:33:49.41 +26:38:07.4
180.56338 -3.43247 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" NSVS 6927263
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.797 g Y 0.924 g 2458632.41590 479.074108400000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:49.41 +26:38:07.4: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:49.41 +26:38:07.4: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.18 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.4194* 05 33 49.41 +26 38 07.4 10.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6927263,2461238.9194,10.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6927263 20260717.4194 10.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 12.31 05:30:39.68 +28:00:49.2
179.02228 -3.27122 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 1.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" [WM2007] 246
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.950 V Y 0.660 V M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:30:39.68 +28:00:49.2: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:30:39.68 +28:00:49.2: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.4194* 05 30 39.68 +28 00 49.2 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[WM2007] 246,2461238.9194,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[WM2007] 246 20260717.4194 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 12.53 05:25:51.29 +25:45:25.3
180.31846 -5.40910 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 0.8 pix
The object was found in VSX12" ASASSN-V J052551.78+254535.1
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.180 V 14.640 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:25:51.29 +25:45:25.3: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:25:51.29 +25:45:25.3: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.4194* 05 25 51.29 +25 45 25.3 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052551.78+254535.1,2461238.9194,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052551.78+254535.1 20260717.4194 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 12.60 05:09:38.58 +28:39:27.8
175.85502 -6.71347 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 1.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1240 Tau
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.900 pg 16.500 pg 2425950.00000 300.000000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:38.58 +28:39:27.8: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:38.58 +28:39:27.8: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.4194* 05 09 38.58 +28 39 27.8 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1240 Tau,2461238.9194,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1240 Tau 20260717.4194 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 13.18 05:20:36.27 +33:24:49.2
173.33086 -2.04496 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J052036.17+332450.3
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.930 g Y 0.840 g 2458756.11900
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:20:36.27 +33:24:49.2: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:20:36.27 +33:24:49.2: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052036.17+332450.3,2461238.9194,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052036.17+332450.3 20260717.4194 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 12.87 05:00:49.75 +34:37:54.1
169.92128 -4.63044 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J050049.56+343752.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.150 V 14.970 V 2458588.30350 89.124492900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:00:49.75 +34:37:54.1: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:00:49.75 +34:37:54.1: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J050049.56+343752.3,2461238.9194,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J050049.56+343752.3 20260717.4194 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 12.73 05:26:02.78 +30:45:03.7
176.18189 -2.59531 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J052602.83+304503.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.170 V 14.640 V 2458384.92960 84.354777000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:26:02.78 +30:45:03.7: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:26:02.78 +30:45:03.7: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052602.83+304503.9,2461238.9194,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052602.83+304503.9 20260717.4194 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 12.07 05:22:53.67 +27:26:44.1
178.54055 -5.01643 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 1.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0522536+272642
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.021 R1 Y 0.451 R1 145.000000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:53.67 +27:26:44.1: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:53.67 +27:26:44.1: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.4194* 05 22 53.67 +27 26 44.1 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0522536+272642,2461238.9194,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0522536+272642 20260717.4194 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 13.38 05:06:35.91 +32:55:06.4
172.01763 -4.71277 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 0.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J050635.89+325504.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.900 V 15.460 V 2458542.42630 240.397658500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:06:35.91 +32:55:06.4: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:06:35.91 +32:55:06.4: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J050635.89+325504.7,2461238.9194,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J050635.89+325504.7 20260717.4194 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 13.11 05:25:20.09 +34:08:13.5
173.29007 -0.82517 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 1.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 182722649100398080
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.680 G 11.950 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:25:20.09 +34:08:13.5: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:25:20.09 +34:08:13.5: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 182722649100398080,2461238.9194,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 182722649100398080 20260717.4194 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.4194 2461238.9194 13.18 05:10:22.61 +27:44:49.2
176.69372 -7.11639 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 0.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J051022.55+274449.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.870 V 15.800 V 2457365.90000 192.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:10:22.61 +27:44:49.2: 14.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:10:22.61 +27:44:49.2: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.4194* 05 10 22.61 +27 44 49.2 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051022.55+274449.6,2461238.9194,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051022.55+274449.6 20260717.4194 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461238.91961027 17.07.2026 10:04:04.327 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15223
Objects passed selection criteria: 15139
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11115.2
Average stars matched: 10806.8 (97.2245 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 123496 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 16 05:04:38 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-156-g3b0d8dc3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 17 05:06:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461238.91961027 17.07.2026 10:04:04.327 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 205
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116798
Objects passed selection criteria: 116537
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 83500.2
Average stars matched: 80197.8 (96.0449 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2017452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 16 05:04:38 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-156-g3b0d8dc3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 17 05:10:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461238.91913191
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.090 +30:00:09.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.090 +30:00:09.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0088 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.317 +30:00:14.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.317 +30:00:14.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.090 +30:00:09.86
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:00.317 +30:00:14.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00151 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00151 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MeULBW58BW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6PGsAenpKq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aifAvBn95H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ssCsq22d5e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6645 deg, Dec +24.3655 to +35.2867 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6645 deg, Dec 24.3655 to 35.2867 deg
Loaded 8424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6043 out of 6742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6742 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6645 deg, Dec +24.3655 to +35.2867 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6645 deg, Dec 24.3655 to 35.2867 deg
Loaded 8424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6043 out of 6742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6742 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5645 to 84.6680 deg, Dec +24.3653 to +35.2868 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5645 to 84.6680 deg, Dec 24.3653 to 35.2868 deg
Loaded 8428 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6047 out of 6745 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6745 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
3.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MeULBW58BW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=360 n_q2=220 n_q3=212 n_q4=162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6PGsAenpKq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=362 n_q2=224 n_q3=203 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aifAvBn95H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=252, bad_region=0, passed=6089
Got 6089 stars (including 5831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6089 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=164 n_q2=146 n_q3=253 n_q4=380 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ssCsq22d5e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=209, bad_region=0, passed=6065
Got 6065 stars (including 5851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.683 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=166 n_q2=147 n_q3=251 n_q4=380 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.070
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.168
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.500 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.518 worst_q_ratio=1.318
reference average sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.119
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 21124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.41 +35:13:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 21154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.51 +31:18:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21167_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 21167_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.21 +31:27:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04945_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 04945_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:12.07 +32:54:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.08 +35:02:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.45 +28:30:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 04242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:35.38 +32:47:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 06441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.34 +32:09:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 10680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.77 +29:20:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.47 +34:08:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.35 +28:36:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.090 +30:00:09.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.090 +30:00:09.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0088 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.317 +30:00:14.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.317 +30:00:14.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.090 +30:00:09.86
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:00.317 +30:00:14.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00151 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00151 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cfdSc5SuPM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4GYeAtOcTG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fqDqmCIwA8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gJuiQSS1y8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5568 to 84.6878 deg, Dec +24.3237 to +35.3004 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5568 to 84.6878 deg, Dec 24.3237 to 35.3004 deg
Loaded 8482 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4945 out of 6875 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6875 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5568 to 84.6878 deg, Dec +24.3237 to +35.3004 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5568 to 84.6878 deg, Dec 24.3237 to 35.3004 deg
Loaded 8482 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4945 out of 6875 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6875 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5645 to 84.6893 deg, Dec +24.3196 to +35.2959 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5645 to 84.6893 deg, Dec 24.3196 to 35.2959 deg
Loaded 8478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4939 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 190 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cfdSc5SuPM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=358 n_q2=221 n_q3=209 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4GYeAtOcTG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 126156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 126161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 126159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=353 n_q2=224 n_q3=210 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fqDqmCIwA8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1893, bad_region=19, passed=39406
Got 39406 stars (including 37437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39406 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.561 n_q1=166 n_q2=143 n_q3=271 n_q4=363 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gJuiQSS1y8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1810, bad_region=19, passed=39270
Got 39270 stars (including 37389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39270 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=169 n_q2=140 n_q3=268 n_q4=365 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-03-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_050450_TTUQ1b1x1_3874965_hZXLQJjQ/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.04 +32:38:14.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:51:24.21 +25:20:02.8: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:36.42 +31:13:46.3: 13.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:57:16.52 +29:07:55.0: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:46:04.48 +28:22:43.0: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.04 +32:38:14.8: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:57:16.52 +29:07:55.0: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.04 +32:38:14.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1408 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:51:24.21 +25:20:02.8: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:46:04.48 +28:22:43.0: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:16.52 +29:07:55.0: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1352 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:24.21 +25:20:02.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2826 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:04.48 +28:22:43.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1623 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:47:21.04 +30:47:52.0: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:36.42 +31:13:46.3: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:36.42 +31:13:46.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2351 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:47:21.04 +30:47:52.0: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:42:48.89 +30:04:53.1: 15.90 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:42:48.89 +30:04:53.1: 16.07 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.97 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:42:48.89 +30:04:53.1: ref_mag=15.97 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.5566 delta=2.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:31:43.85 +28:28:16.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:31:43.85 +28:28:16.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:11.61 +32:11:11.6: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:11.61 +32:11:11.6: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:33:11.61 +32:11:11.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4296 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:53:57.03 +27:28:00.3: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:53:57.03 +27:28:00.3: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:53:57.03 +27:28:00.3: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2536 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:49.41 +26:38:07.4: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:49.41 +26:38:07.4: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:33:49.41 +26:38:07.4: ref_mag=11.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2473 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:25:51.29 +25:45:25.3: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:30:39.68 +28:00:49.2: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:25:51.29 +25:45:25.3: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:25:51.29 +25:45:25.3: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5122 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:30:39.68 +28:00:49.2: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:39.68 +28:00:49.2: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3046 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:38.58 +28:39:27.8: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:20:36.27 +33:24:49.2: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:00:49.75 +34:37:54.1: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:38.58 +28:39:27.8: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:20:36.27 +33:24:49.2: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:09:38.58 +28:39:27.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5923 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:20:36.27 +33:24:49.2: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1553 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:00:49.75 +34:37:54.1: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:00:49.75 +34:37:54.1: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8573 delta=1.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:53.67 +27:26:44.1: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:26:02.78 +30:45:03.7: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:53.67 +27:26:44.1: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:22:53.67 +27:26:44.1: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0687 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:26:02.78 +30:45:03.7: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:26:02.78 +30:45:03.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7344 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:06:35.91 +32:55:06.4: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:06:35.91 +32:55:06.4: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:06:35.91 +32:55:06.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3288 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:25:20.09 +34:08:13.5: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:25:20.09 +34:08:13.5: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:25:20.09 +34:08:13.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0853 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:10:22.61 +27:44:49.2: 14.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:10:22.61 +27:44:49.2: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:10:22.61 +27:44:49.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1718 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08465.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107779.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113795.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11571.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119522.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121914.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out126751.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151259.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23625.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33915.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38857.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61400.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 12s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151107_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151107_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:31.43 +33:17:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:43.33 +33:27:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:04.56 +29:46:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.43 +35:13:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151179_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151179_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151240_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151240_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.86 +33:05:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151259_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 151259_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151261_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151261_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.10 +33:47:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151271_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151271_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.46 +34:26:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.74 +34:09:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151289_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151289_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.33 +34:07:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151306_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151306_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:27.97 +34:07:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151316_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151316_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.94 +33:06:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151332_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151332_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151337_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151337_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151338_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151338_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.50 +34:49:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:28.12 +30:16:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151350_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151350_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.70 +32:42:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151367_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151367_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.06 +34:06:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151370_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151370_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.92 +26:55:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151382_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151382_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.62 +33:00:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.70 +34:23:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151388_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151388_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.74 +32:33:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.79 +26:10:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151401_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151401_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:18.57 +34:10:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151405_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151405_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151410_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151410_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.57 +32:53:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151415_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151415_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.38 +31:23:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.99 +28:31:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.99 +28:37:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151430_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151430_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.36 +34:07:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151445_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151445_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151471_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151471_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151501_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151501_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:46.07 +26:25:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151506_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151506_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151607_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151607_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151609_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151609_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151610_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151610_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.55 +34:06:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151634_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151634_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:56.15 +33:34:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151641_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151641_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.48 +33:11:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151669_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151669_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151671_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151671_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151690_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151690_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151694_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151694_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.84 +29:47:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.35 +31:44:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151741_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151741_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.74 +29:45:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151744_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151744_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151760_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151760_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151768_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151768_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151777_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151777_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.66 +33:12:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151785_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151785_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151786_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151786_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151788_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151788_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151799_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151799_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151809_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151809_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.81 +31:24:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151826_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151826_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151835_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151835_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151847_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151847_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151851_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151851_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151852_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 151852_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151861_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151861_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:13.48 +30:07:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151879_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151879_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151903_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151903_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151904_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151904_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151908_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151908_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151913_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151913_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151917_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151917_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151918_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151918_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151920_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151920_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151921_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151921_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151925_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151925_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:17.21 +30:17:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151948_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151948_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:02.52 +31:54:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151958_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151958_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151963_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151963_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151969_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151969_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 151970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151971_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151971_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151974_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151974_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.03 +31:04:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151976_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151976_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151978_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151978_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151984_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151984_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151988_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 151988_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.60 +30:10:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.54 +31:18:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.76 +29:20:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.23 +32:10:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 30241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:25.07 +32:57:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 34959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:05.10 +32:51:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.46 +28:30:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:58.74 +25:08:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38857_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 38857_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.82 +29:00:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:02.88 +32:26:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.33 +29:42:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.37 +26:08:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121425_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 121425_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:50.83 +28:43:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.29 +27:03:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103810_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 103810_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:43.22 +26:03:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.48 +28:42:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 107779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 84209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:29.71 +29:26:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55351_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 55351_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:30.35 +31:26:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 16878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.88 +33:57:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:08.98 +25:22:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 44278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.36 +32:09:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:51.08 +26:46:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 14221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:04.28 +34:10:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:50.71 +28:10:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99216_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 99216_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.49 +33:50:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.24 +25:24:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 29397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:35.36 +32:47:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.18 +30:48:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23625_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 23625_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:02.18 +31:50:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 95321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:54.71 +25:01:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 40884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:51.34 +32:03:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.93 +30:05:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.15 +27:01:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73665_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 73665_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.47 +34:08:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 41970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.34 +26:45:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.37 +25:58:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 115396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.21 +32:02:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 76838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:07.73 +29:58:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33915_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 33915_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 33728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:12.08 +32:54:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 70065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:49.55 +30:24:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11714_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 11714_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:37.15 +34:02:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101985_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 101985_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:11.24 +32:26:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112075_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 112075_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:52.90 +30:33:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.29 +31:29:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.46 +35:03:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58936_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 58936_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.21 +31:03:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96029_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 96029_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:52.77 +32:28:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 66692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:14.43 +30:29:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:45.05 +28:01:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 119884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:47.34 +27:53:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 25109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:59.68 +33:09:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:24.06 +32:41:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 78812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.46 +29:34:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:10.48 +33:22:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 94158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:09.42 +25:03:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.26 +25:08:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.33 +28:36:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.74 +34:28:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 12946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:00.78 +33:57:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:43.57 +32:11:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67090_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 67090_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
