This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 12.60 00:09:19.56 +55:55:46.5
117.01922 -6.45796 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.8" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:09:19.56 +55:55:46.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.495+/-0.043 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:09:19.56 +55:55:46.5: 13.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:09:19.56 +55:55:46.5: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 00 09 19.56 +55 55 46.5 12.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461238.7349,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260717.2349 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 12.63 23:40:01.53 +56:31:37.9
113.15969 -4.98356 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J355.0048+56.5277 | 23:40:01.53 +56:31:37.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:40:01.53 +56:31:37.9: 13.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:40:01.53 +56:31:37.9: 13.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 23 40 01.53 +56 31 37.9 12.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J355.0048+56.5277,2461238.7349,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J355.0048+56.5277 20260717.2349 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 12.14 23:41:11.17 +57:06:27.2
113.47123 -4.46816 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.6" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J355.3012+57.1115 | 23:41:13.68 +57:05:58.3 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.954+/-0.033 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:41:11.17 +57:06:27.2: 13.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:41:11.17 +57:06:27.2: 13.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 23 41 11.17 +57 06 27.2 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J355.3012+57.1115,2461238.7349,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J355.3012+57.1115 20260717.2349 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 12.16 00:00:02.93 +58:01:31.2
116.15188 -4.16833 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" Gaia DR3 422632311013907840
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.110 G 14.160 G A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:00:02.93 +58:01:31.2: 13.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:00:02.93 +58:01:31.2: 13.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 00 00 02.93 +58 01 31.2 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 422632311013907840,2461238.7349,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 422632311013907840 20260717.2349 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 12.05 23:50:47.98 +54:44:21.3
114.18128 -7.09897 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.6" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1993807523430215040 | 23:50:51.31 +54:44:46.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:50:47.98 +54:44:21.3: 13.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:50:47.98 +54:44:21.3: 13.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 23 50 47.98 +54 44 21.3 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1993807523430215040,2461238.7349,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1993807523430215040 20260717.2349 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 12.03 00:13:59.75 +57:05:18.3
117.83915 -5.41264 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J003.4741+57.0746 | 00:13:55.34 +57:04:53.4 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:13:59.75 +57:05:18.3: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:13:59.75 +57:05:18.3: 13.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 00 13 59.75 +57 05 18.3 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J003.4741+57.0746,2461238.7349,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J003.4741+57.0746 20260717.2349 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 11.66 00:30:59.96 +57:24:59.9
120.17081 -5.34550 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 421839975445105536
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.480 G 13.690 G 2.085110000000 F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:30:59.96 +57:24:59.9: 13.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:30:59.96 +57:24:59.9: 13.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 00 30 59.96 +57 24 59.9 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 421839975445105536,2461238.7349,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 421839975445105536 20260717.2349 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 11.25 00:24:29.87 +57:44:06.0
119.32900 -4.94817 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 422083031936705536 | 00:24:27.49 +57:43:56.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:24:29.87 +57:44:06.0: 13.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:24:29.87 +57:44:06.0: 13.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 00 24 29.87 +57 44 06.0 11.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 422083031936705536,2461238.7349,11.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 422083031936705536 20260717.2349 11.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 11.02 23:51:56.74 +54:36:20.0
114.31237 -7.26750 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J357.9874+54.6136 | 23:51:56.74 +54:36:20.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.372+/-0.028 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:51:56.74 +54:36:20.0: 13.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:51:56.74 +54:36:20.0: 13.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 23 51 56.74 +54 36 20.0 11.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J357.9874+54.6136,2461238.7349,11.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J357.9874+54.6136 20260717.2349 11.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 11.95 00:03:28.13 +55:39:04.5
116.15439 -6.58799 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J000.8743+55.6410 | 00:03:28.13 +55:39:04.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:03:28.13 +55:39:04.5: 13.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:03:28.13 +55:39:04.5: 13.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 00 03 28.13 +55 39 04.5 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J000.8743+55.6410,2461238.7349,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J000.8743+55.6410 20260717.2349 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 12.87 23:41:24.37 +56:47:34.4
113.41529 -4.77929 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.9" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:41:24.37 +56:47:34.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.458+/-0.052 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:41:24.37 +56:47:34.4: 13.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:41:24.37 +56:47:34.4: 13.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 23 41 24.37 +56 47 34.4 12.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461238.7349,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260717.2349 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.2349 2461238.7349 12.41 00:17:03.92 +57:58:30.4
118.37271 -4.59204 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.6" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 422068669560915584 | 00:17:00.77 +57:58:22.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:17:03.92 +57:58:30.4: 13.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:17:03.92 +57:58:30.4: 13.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 17.2349* 00 17 03.92 +57 58 30.4 12.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 422068669560915584,2461238.7349,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 422068669560915584 20260717.2349 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461211.92320941 20.06.2026 10:09:15.293 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
First image: 2461211.92320941 20.06.2026 10:09:15.293 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Last image: 2461238.73519085 17.07.2026 05:38:30.489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22240
Objects passed selection criteria: 22225
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21134.8
Average stars matched: 20164.5 (95.4092 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131332 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 16 05:04:38 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-156-g3b0d8dc3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 17 00:51:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461211.92320941 20.06.2026 10:09:15.293 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
First image: 2461211.92320941 20.06.2026 10:09:15.293 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Last image: 2461238.73519085 17.07.2026 05:38:30.489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 391
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 341 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 173110
Objects passed selection criteria: 172672
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 164427
Average stars matched: 156701 (95.3013 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1954048 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 16 05:04:38 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-156-g3b0d8dc3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 17 01:10:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461238.73469432
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits'
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Image size: 926.8'x616.3' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.81"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.7"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.970 +53:59:52.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.970 +53:59:52.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0235 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Image size: 927.2'x616.6' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.988 +54:01:11.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.988 +54:01:11.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0060 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.970 +53:59:52.30
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:59.988 +54:01:11.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02258 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8Oqgjr9u9L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cqUdr3lHAX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UfT72AFezq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YiSKFXvDRZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28951 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0012 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +48.2682 to +59.2677 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0012 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 48.2682 to 59.2677 deg
Loaded 153348 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 52 out of 57 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 57 out of 28951 detected stars.
ERROR: only 52 of 28951 stars detected on the reference image matched the Tycho-2 photometric calibration catalog (0.18%) - the reference image plate solution is likely broken and the magnitude calibration is unreliable
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.575300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.575300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28951 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0012 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +48.2682 to +59.2677 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0012 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 48.2682 to 59.2677 deg
Loaded 153348 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 52 out of 57 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 57 out of 28951 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 32399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0011 to 359.9996 deg, Dec +48.2682 to +59.2618 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0011 to 359.9996 deg, Dec 48.2682 to 59.2618 deg
Loaded 153285 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 56 out of 62 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 62 out of 32399 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
2.3 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
15.0 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8Oqgjr9u9L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits 568.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2748, bad_region=6855, passed=28951
Got 28951 stars (including 19826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28951 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012872 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010298 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0821 through 0 to 14.9840, gap 14.9840 to 345.0821
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 331 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 241 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.18"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 235 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.02"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0724 through 0 to 15.0101, gap 15.0101 to 345.0724
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 401 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 345 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.97"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 341 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.85"
Excluding outliers - 341 stars left (next iteration limit 258)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits N_match=341 sigma_overall_arcsec=10.000 sigma_q1_arcsec=26.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=26.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=7.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.000 n_q1=41 n_q2=24 n_q3=122 n_q4=154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.646
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cqUdr3lHAX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits 568.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3204, bad_region=7312, passed=32399
Got 32399 stars (including 22421 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32399 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012871 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010297 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0823 through 0 to 14.9840, gap 14.9840 to 345.0823
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 320 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 226 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0732 through 0 to 15.0096, gap 15.0096 to 345.0732
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 399 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 343 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 340 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.44"
Excluding outliers - 340 stars left (next iteration limit 248)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=340 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.206 sigma_q1_arcsec=29.679 sigma_q2_arcsec=28.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.911 n_q1=41 n_q2=25 n_q3=115 n_q4=159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.649
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UfT72AFezq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2114, bad_region=5092, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 17136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9297 through 0 to 14.8411, gap 14.8411 to 344.9297
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9273 through 0 to 14.8407, gap 14.8407 to 344.9273
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.589 n_q1=296 n_q2=217 n_q3=264 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YiSKFXvDRZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2152, bad_region=5089, passed=24014
Got 24014 stars (including 17083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012878 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010302 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0000 through 0 to 14.9421, gap 14.9421 to 345.0000
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 318 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 221 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.91"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 206 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9804 through 0 to 14.9637, gap 14.9637 to 344.9804
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 380 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 298 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 294 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.34"
Excluding outliers - 294 stars left (next iteration limit 226)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=294 sigma_overall_arcsec=13.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=24.578 sigma_q2_arcsec=25.911 sigma_q3_arcsec=10.852 sigma_q4_arcsec=12.313 n_q1=25 n_q2=20 n_q3=106 n_q4=143 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.941
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits sigma_overall=10.000 worst_q_ratio=2.646
ref2=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits sigma_overall=11.206 worst_q_ratio=2.649
new1=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.591 worst_q_ratio=1.077
new2=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=13.352 worst_q_ratio=1.941
reference average sigma_overall=10.603 worst_q_ratio=2.6475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468_astrometric_residuals.png (341 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 3.98 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (340 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 3.94 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (294 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 5.88 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33566_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 33566_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33567_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 33567_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (331.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33576_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 33576_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (184.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33720_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 33720_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (172.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33728_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 33728_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (165.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 21482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 07077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.2") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Image size: 926.8'x616.3' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.81"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.7"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.970 +53:59:52.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.970 +53:59:52.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0235 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Image size: 927.2'x616.6' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.988 +54:01:11.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.988 +54:01:11.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0060 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.970 +53:59:52.30
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:59.988 +54:01:11.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02258 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R7KsMlb4nV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Ep4ABPsXI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZMbeuCTGZx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rlNUHzPnvZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 200953 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +48.2503 to +59.2677 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 48.2503 to 59.2677 deg
Loaded 153589 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 104 out of 148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 148 out of 200953 detected stars.
ERROR: only 104 of 200953 stars detected on the reference image matched the Tycho-2 photometric calibration catalog (0.05%) - the reference image plate solution is likely broken and the magnitude calibration is unreliable
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 20.521000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=20.521000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 200953 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +48.2503 to +59.2677 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 48.2503 to 59.2677 deg
Loaded 153589 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 104 out of 148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 148 out of 200953 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 213202 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +48.2308 to +59.2649 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 48.2308 to 59.2649 deg
Loaded 153847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 122 out of 166 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 166 out of 213202 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 301 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
2.2 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.2 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
13.3 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.R7KsMlb4nV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits 568.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=60, blended=29230, bad_region=30798, passed=200893
Got 200893 stars (including 144443 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 200893 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012872 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010298 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0121 through 0 to 15.0290, gap 15.0290 to 345.0121
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 326 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 236 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 225 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0161 through 0 to 15.0639, gap 15.0639 to 345.0161
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 402 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 347 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 341 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.71"
Excluding outliers - 341 stars left (next iteration limit 247)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits N_match=341 sigma_overall_arcsec=10.173 sigma_q1_arcsec=28.653 sigma_q2_arcsec=29.926 sigma_q3_arcsec=7.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.943 n_q1=31 n_q2=26 n_q3=117 n_q4=167 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.942
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0Ep4ABPsXI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits 568.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=9, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=33709, bad_region=29431, passed=213150
Got 213150 stars (including 154424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 213150 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012871 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010297 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0123 through 0 to 15.0317, gap 15.0317 to 345.0123
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 319 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 236 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 227 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0158 through 0 to 15.0663, gap 15.0663 to 345.0158
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 395 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 336 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 332 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.69"
Excluding outliers - 332 stars left (next iteration limit 249)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=332 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.113 sigma_q1_arcsec=28.693 sigma_q2_arcsec=26.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.129 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.837 n_q1=36 n_q2=26 n_q3=118 n_q4=152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.582
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZMbeuCTGZx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=55, blended=22553, bad_region=24907, passed=178033
Got 178033 stars (including 133151 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 178033 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.8617 through 0 to 14.8411, gap 14.8411 to 344.8617
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 156347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.8593 through 0 to 14.8408, gap 14.8408 to 344.8593
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 156347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 156345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.582 n_q1=299 n_q2=215 n_q3=254 n_q4=205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rlNUHzPnvZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=61, blended=22769, bad_region=25114, passed=178701
Got 178701 stars (including 133409 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 178701 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012878 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010302 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9274 through 0 to 14.9456, gap 14.9456 to 344.9274
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 321 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 231 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 217 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.19"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9136 through 0 to 14.9696, gap 14.9696 to 344.9136
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 399 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.17"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.89"
Excluding outliers - 313 stars left (next iteration limit 238)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=313 sigma_overall_arcsec=9.610 sigma_q1_arcsec=29.876 sigma_q2_arcsec=24.770 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.852 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.468 n_q1=36 n_q2=21 n_q3=119 n_q4=137 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-37-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_003904_TTUQ2b1x1_1917778_UQuVH8ez/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:09:19.56 +55:55:46.5: 13.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:09:19.56 +55:55:46.5: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:03:26.35 +56:17:41.3: 12.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:03:26.35 +56:17:41.3: 11.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:26.35 +56:17:41.3: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.5545 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:40:01.53 +56:31:37.9: 13.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:40:01.53 +56:31:37.9: 13.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:34:59.26 +57:54:44.0: 12.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:34:59.26 +57:54:44.0: 12.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:59.26 +57:54:44.0: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.5295 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:41:11.17 +57:06:27.2: 13.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:41:11.17 +57:06:27.2: 13.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:00:02.93 +58:01:31.2: 13.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:00:02.93 +58:01:31.2: 13.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:50:47.98 +54:44:21.3: 13.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:13:59.75 +57:05:18.3: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:13:59.75 +57:05:18.3: 13.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:50:47.98 +54:44:21.3: 13.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:30:59.96 +57:24:59.9: 13.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:30:59.96 +57:24:59.9: 13.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:57:12.96 +56:39:03.4: 11.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:57:12.96 +56:39:03.4: 10.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:12.96 +56:39:03.4: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.7132 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:24:29.87 +57:44:06.0: 13.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:24:29.87 +57:44:06.0: 13.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:51:56.74 +54:36:20.0: 13.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:52:28.66 +54:56:19.3: 8.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:51:56.74 +54:36:20.0: 13.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:52:28.66 +54:56:19.3: 8.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:28.66 +54:56:19.3: ref_mag=8.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6883 delta=-2.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:03:28.13 +55:39:04.5: 13.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:03:28.13 +55:39:04.5: 13.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:55:11.32 +54:35:51.0: 12.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:55:11.32 +54:35:51.0: 12.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:11.32 +54:35:51.0: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.0494 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:52:44.53 +55:30:16.1: 12.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:52:44.53 +55:30:16.1: 12.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:44.53 +55:30:16.1: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.3610 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:50:01.39 +54:42:00.8: 9.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:50:01.39 +54:42:00.8: 9.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:01.39 +54:42:00.8: ref_mag=9.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3713 delta=-2.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:56:16.14 +57:47:04.4: 11.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:56:16.14 +57:47:04.4: 11.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:16.14 +57:47:04.4: ref_mag=11.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5072 delta=-1.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 23:41:24.37 +56:47:34.4: 13.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 00:17:03.92 +57:58:30.4: 13.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 23:41:24.37 +56:47:34.4: 13.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-58-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 00:17:03.92 +57:58:30.4: 13.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out235713.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out235948.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out236174.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out236192.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out236218.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out236221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out236298.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out236378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out236425.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out237295.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out237924.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out237962.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 36s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 11s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235654_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235654_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235713_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 235713_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235733_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235733_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235740_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235740_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235742_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235742_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235750_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235750_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235756_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235756_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235764_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235764_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235775_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235775_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235776_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235776_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235778_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235778_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235787_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235787_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (177.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235792_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235792_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235807_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235807_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235820_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235820_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235822_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235822_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (273.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235828_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235828_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (245.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235829_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235829_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235835_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235835_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235837_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235837_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235840_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235840_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235854_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235854_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (318.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (264.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235868_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235868_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235877_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235877_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (230.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235889_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235889_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235900_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235900_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235921_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235921_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235922_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235922_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235925_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235925_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235928_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235928_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (204.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235933_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235933_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (273.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 235948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235951_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235951_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (219.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235952_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235952_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235956_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235956_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (216.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235962_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235962_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235968_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235968_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235969_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235969_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (377.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235978_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235978_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235986_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235986_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (273.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235987_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235987_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235990_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235990_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (351.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235994_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 235994_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (427.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236000_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236000_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (276.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236010_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236010_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236014_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236014_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236017_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236017_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (156.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236020_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236020_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236025_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236025_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236029_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236029_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (274.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236031_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236031_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (406.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236037_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236037_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236045_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236045_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236047_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236047_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (152.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236048_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236048_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236063_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236063_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236072_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236072_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (440.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236074_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236074_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (254.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236080_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236080_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (256.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236081_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236081_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236083_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236083_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236085_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236085_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (177.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236088_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236088_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (79.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236092_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236092_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (203.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236095_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236095_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (300.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236096_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236096_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236105_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236105_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236108_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236108_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (154.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236112_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236112_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236122_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236122_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (202.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236127_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236127_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (237.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236139_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236139_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236142_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236142_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236147_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236147_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (255.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236148_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236148_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (358.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236159_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236159_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236161_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236161_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236167_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236167_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (308.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 236174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236186_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236186_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236189_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236189_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236192_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 236192_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236193_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236193_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236195_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236195_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236196_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236196_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236200_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236200_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (247.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236203_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236203_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (295.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236208_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236208_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236211_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236211_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (194.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236214_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236214_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236215_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236215_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236216_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236216_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (170.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 236218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236219_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236219_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236220_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236220_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 236221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236225_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236225_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236232_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236232_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (250.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236233_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236233_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236237_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236237_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236238_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236238_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (135.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236243_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236243_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236246_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236246_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236251_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236251_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (204.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236253_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236253_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236254_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236254_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (308.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236255_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236255_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236261_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236261_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236264_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236264_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (301.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236275_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236275_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (208.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:32.22 +54:57:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236280_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236280_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236283_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236283_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (198.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236284_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236284_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236286_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236286_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (72.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (187.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236292_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236292_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236295_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236295_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236298_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 236298_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236303_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236303_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236304_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236304_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (359.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236309_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236309_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (188.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236328_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236328_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236331_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236331_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (236.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236337_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236337_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236338_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236338_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236342_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236342_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (188.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236343_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236343_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236345_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236345_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236366_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236366_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (328.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236375_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236375_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236378_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 236378_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236382_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236382_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (338.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236384_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236384_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236389_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236389_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:57:15.53 +56:30:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236391_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236391_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236396_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236396_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236401_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236401_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (266.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236406_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236406_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (63.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236411_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236411_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236414_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236414_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236422_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236422_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236425_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 236425_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236434_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236434_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236437_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236437_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (79.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (286.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236443_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236443_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (279.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236445_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236445_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (290.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236446_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236446_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236447_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236447_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236448_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236448_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (203.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236449_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236449_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (266.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236682_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236682_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236811_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236811_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (220.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236865_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236865_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (186.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236943_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236943_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (224.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236966_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236966_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236974_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236974_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (457.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236984_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236984_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236995_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236995_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236998_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 236998_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (276.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237058_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237058_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237075_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237075_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237097_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237097_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:47:41.62 +56:51:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (302.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237109_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237109_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237110_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237110_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (303.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237114_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237114_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237124_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237124_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237136_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237136_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237154_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237154_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237164_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237164_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (178.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237170_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237170_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (81.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237176_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237176_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (206.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237182_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237182_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (265.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237189_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237189_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (178.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237193_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237193_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (256.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237200_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237200_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237207_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237207_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (291.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237215_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237215_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237217_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237217_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237226_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237226_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237231_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237231_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (261.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237235_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237235_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (341.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237253_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237253_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237257_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237257_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237260_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237260_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237272_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237272_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237288_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237288_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237294_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237294_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237295_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 237295_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237309_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237309_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237311_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237311_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (233.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237320_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237320_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237325_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237325_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237349_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237349_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (155.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (261.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237357_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237357_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237368_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237368_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (216.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237386_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237386_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237400_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237400_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (274.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237419_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237419_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (400.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237427_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237427_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237436_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237436_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (205.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237437_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237437_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237438_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237438_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (101.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237448_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237448_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237457_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237457_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (260.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (302.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237477_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237477_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237589_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237589_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (207.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237607_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237607_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (384.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237626_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237626_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237630_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237630_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237637_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237637_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237640_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237640_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (268.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237644_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237644_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237657_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237657_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (455.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237659_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237659_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237660_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237660_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (170.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237694_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237694_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (196.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237697_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237697_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (236.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237699_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237699_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237712_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237712_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237713_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237713_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (192.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237729_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237729_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237745_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237745_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (313.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237751_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237751_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (209.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237757_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237757_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (392.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237759_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237759_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (266.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237779_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237779_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (276.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237780_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237780_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (342.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237782_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237782_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237785_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237785_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (247.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237790_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237790_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237821_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237821_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (261.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237837_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237837_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (91.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237843_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237843_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (151.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237846_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237846_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (100.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237924_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 237924_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237962_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 237962_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237975_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237975_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237991_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 237991_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238028_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238028_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238052_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238052_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238053_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238053_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238069_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238069_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238080_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238080_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238133_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238133_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (191.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238166_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238166_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238224_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238224_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238308_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 238308_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 179100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:15:50.34 +57:32:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 46841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197606_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 197606_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:44:31.46 +56:34:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25587_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146
The candidate 25587_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-17_00-38-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0146 did not pass the final checks
