This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.1902 2461238.6902 14.02 06:49:30.89 +72:50:58.8
142.03171 25.69027 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:49:30.89 +72:50:58.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:49:30.89 +72:50:58.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 06:49:30.89 +72:50:58.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461238.6902,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260717.1902 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 17.1902 2461238.6902 12.99 06:50:00.92 +73:08:38.9
141.71506 25.77203 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0650008+730839
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.042 r Y 0.358 r 2458592.11660 60.011709700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:50:00.92 +73:08:38.9: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 06:50:00.92 +73:08:38.9: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0650008+730839,2461238.6902,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0650008+730839 20260717.1902 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last image: 2461238.69046936 17.07.2026 04:34:06.553 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8741
Objects passed selection criteria: 8715
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6926
Average stars matched: 6776 (97.8342 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118708 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 16 05:04:38 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-156-g3b0d8dc3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 17 00:09:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last image: 2461238.69046936 17.07.2026 04:34:06.553 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 147
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58113
Objects passed selection criteria: 57988
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46020.8
Average stars matched: 44530.2 (96.7612 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 166384 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 16 05:04:38 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-156-g3b0d8dc3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 17 00:13:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461238.68989762
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:11:57.886 +70:01:01.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:11:57.886 +70:01:01.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0379 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Image size: 937.4'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:11:59.670 +70:01:10.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:11:59.670 +70:01:10.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0382 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:11:57.886 +70:01:01.10
Second-epoch second image center 07:11:59.670 +70:01:10.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00368 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0ZFgwsjbTw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o0DTmJ6QMG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0VVaeR6Dlz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u63zuBmzne
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13381 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8991 to +75.4715 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8991 to 75.4715 deg
Loaded 12879 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7120 out of 7567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7567 out of 13381 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.876000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.876000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13381 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8991 to +75.4715 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8991 to 75.4715 deg
Loaded 12879 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7120 out of 7567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7567 out of 13381 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 12112 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6329 to 136.4974 deg, Dec +62.8991 to +75.4821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6329 to 136.4974 deg, Dec 62.8991 to 75.4821 deg
Loaded 12885 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7055 out of 7480 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7480 out of 12112 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.2 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0ZFgwsjbTw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=962, bad_region=3723, passed=13381
Got 13381 stars (including 8954 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13381 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=277 n_q2=204 n_q3=293 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o0DTmJ6QMG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=905, bad_region=3431, passed=12112
Got 12112 stars (including 8027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12112 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=287 n_q2=202 n_q3=288 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0VVaeR6Dlz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=310, bad_region=1383, passed=6401
Got 6401 stars (including 4781 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6401 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=319 n_q2=211 n_q3=276 n_q4=154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u63zuBmzne (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=269, bad_region=1323, passed=5801
Got 5801 stars (including 4296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.560 n_q1=303 n_q2=164 n_q3=318 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.181
ref2=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits sigma_overall=0.415 worst_q_ratio=1.160
new1=fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits sigma_overall=0.484 worst_q_ratio=1.269
new2=fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits sigma_overall=0.465 worst_q_ratio=1.205
reference average sigma_overall=0.3625 worst_q_ratio=1.1705
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01243_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 01243_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:59.60 +73:24:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:11:57.886 +70:01:01.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:11:57.886 +70:01:01.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0379 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Image size: 937.4'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:11:59.670 +70:01:10.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:11:59.670 +70:01:10.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0382 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:11:57.886 +70:01:01.10
Second-epoch second image center 07:11:59.670 +70:01:10.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00368 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1HDLzQPaSt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nwGdb9O9kU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G7vFnd2vYQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e4Oprjpys7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 82728 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8276 to +75.4772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8276 to 75.4772 deg
Loaded 12987 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6447 out of 7633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7633 out of 82728 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.743600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.743600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 82728 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8276 to +75.4772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8276 to 75.4772 deg
Loaded 12987 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6447 out of 7633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7633 out of 82728 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 78594 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6329 to 136.4972 deg, Dec +62.8278 to +75.4923 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6329 to 136.4972 deg, Dec 62.8278 to 75.4923 deg
Loaded 12998 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6486 out of 7628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7628 out of 78594 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 79 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.0 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1HDLzQPaSt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5466, bad_region=19090, passed=82717
Got 82717 stars (including 59431 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82717 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=282 n_q2=197 n_q3=299 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nwGdb9O9kU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=5023, bad_region=18434, passed=78565
Got 78565 stars (including 56306 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78565 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61743 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=280 n_q2=201 n_q3=298 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G7vFnd2vYQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1945, bad_region=6286, passed=38300
Got 38300 stars (including 30904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38300 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=321 n_q2=210 n_q3=283 n_q4=146 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e4Oprjpys7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1755, bad_region=5980, passed=35245
Got 35245 stars (including 28336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.594 n_q1=312 n_q2=155 n_q3=325 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-33-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-17_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_000435_TTUQ2b1x1_2399986_siGdy4O8/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:14:36.48 +67:37:14.7: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:31:11.42 +72:52:54.5: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 06:31:11.42 +72:52:54.5: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:11.42 +72:52:54.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3819 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 08:14:36.48 +67:37:14.7: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:14:36.48 +67:37:14.7: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2134 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:47:19.36 +66:51:38.5: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 06:47:19.36 +66:51:38.5: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:19.36 +66:51:38.5: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2593 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:49:30.89 +72:50:58.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 06:49:30.89 +72:50:58.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:50:00.92 +73:08:38.9: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 06:50:00.92 +73:08:38.9: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:50:00.92 +73:08:38.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9773 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16440.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out98474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96090_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96090_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:14.35 +73:14:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96091_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96091_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96092_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96092_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:40.88 +67:24:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96093_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96093_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96094_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96094_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:32.29 +68:11:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96098_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96098_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96308_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96308_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96329_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96329_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96414_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96414_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96468_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96468_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96487_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96487_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:40.30 +73:10:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96629_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96629_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96678_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96678_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96736_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96736_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96738_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96738_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96791_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96791_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96881_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96881_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.66 +70:50:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96893_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96893_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96915_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96915_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96941_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 96941_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97042_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97042_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97049_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97049_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97101_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97101_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97131_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97131_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:19.64 +71:49:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97165_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97165_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97195_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97195_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97196_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97222_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97222_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97225_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97225_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:29.87 +68:27:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97263_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97263_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:04.51 +68:11:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97299_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97299_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97303_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97303_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97318_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97318_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97329_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97329_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97360_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97360_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:22.85 +71:06:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97364_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97364_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:50.58 +70:44:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97403_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97403_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97463_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97463_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97496_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97496_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97530_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97530_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97545_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97545_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97559_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97559_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97568_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97568_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:58.27 +70:31:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97580_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97580_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97582_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97582_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97611_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97611_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97622_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97622_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97637_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97637_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97723_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97723_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97727_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97727_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:21.93 +68:13:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97738_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97738_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97750_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97750_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:11.70 +72:41:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97897_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97897_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97926_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97926_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97945_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97945_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:14.14 +68:18:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97994_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 97994_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98085_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98085_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98136_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98136_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98162_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98162_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98163_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98163_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98174_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98174_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:26.72 +73:06:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98316_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98316_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98338_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98338_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98375_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98375_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98385_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98385_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:00.26 +69:24:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98439_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98439_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98446_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98446_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98474_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 98474_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98492_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98492_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98518_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98518_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98523_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98523_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98534_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98534_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98548_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 98548_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34351_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 34351_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.73 +70:41:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69834_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 69834_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06621_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 06621_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:59.59 +73:24:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16440_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 16440_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70716_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 70716_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70375_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119
The candidate 70375_fd_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-16_23-34-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0119 did not pass the final checks