This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 10.57 15:43:47.62 -28:10:56.2
343.08037 20.94979 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.29 Amphitrite -0 -1 1 10.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:43:47.62 -28:10:56.2: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:43:47.62 -28:10:56.2: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461237.6366,10.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260716.1366 10.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 10.71 15:57:10.23 -20:34:45.1
351.10648 24.45382 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 0 -0 0 11.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:57:10.23 -20:34:45.1: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:57:10.23 -20:34:45.1: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461237.6366,10.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260716.1366 10.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 12.38 16:02:50.16 -21:20:52.7
351.52176 22.97201 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 -0 1 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:02:50.16 -21:20:52.7: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:02:50.16 -21:20:52.7: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461237.6366,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260716.1366 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 12.93 16:27:07.51 -23:00:35.2
354.27603 17.70803 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 1 -0 1 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:27:07.51 -23:00:35.2: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:27:07.51 -23:00:35.2: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461237.6366,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260716.1366 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 13.04 15:52:29.65 -25:23:10.8
346.63462 21.74231 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.674 Rachele 1 -0 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:52:29.65 -25:23:10.8: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:52:29.65 -25:23:10.8: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461237.6366,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260716.1366 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 13.29 16:27:43.82 -25:46:59.5
352.19307 15.77603 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.175 Andromache 2 -0 2 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:27:43.82 -25:46:59.5: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:27:43.82 -25:46:59.5: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461237.6366,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260716.1366 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 13.28 16:26:15.47 -27:26:55.5
350.67790 14.91149 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.108 Hecuba 1 -1 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:26:15.47 -27:26:55.5: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:26:15.47 -27:26:55.5: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461237.6366,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260716.1366 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 13.73 16:05:07.93 -27:22:42.1
347.34714 18.34674 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.123 Brunhild 0 2 2 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:05:07.93 -27:22:42.1: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:05:07.93 -27:22:42.1: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461237.6366,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260716.1366 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 13.84 16:12:28.95 -24:08:09.0
351.01827 19.43689 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.481 Emita 1 -1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:12:28.95 -24:08:09.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:12:28.95 -24:08:09.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461237.6366,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260716.1366 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 16.1366 2461237.6366 12.80 16:31:23.36 -29:54:30.9
349.56719 12.43104 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J163123.41-295431.4
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.270 V 15.140 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:31:23.36 -29:54:30.9: 13.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:31:23.36 -29:54:30.9: 13.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J163123.41-295431.4,2461237.6366,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J163123.41-295431.4 20260716.1366 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461205.74478639 14.06.2026 05:52:19.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
First image: 2461205.74478639 14.06.2026 05:52:19.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Last image: 2461237.63704943 16.07.2026 03:17:11.071 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 51
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8465
Objects passed selection criteria: 8462
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8119.25
Average stars matched: 7837.75 (96.5329 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117136 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 15 19:22:19 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-155-g87a29d73
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 16 01:01:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461205.74478639 14.06.2026 05:52:19.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
First image: 2461205.74478639 14.06.2026 05:52:19.544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Last image: 2461237.63704943 16.07.2026 03:17:11.071 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 130
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 76 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 77086
Objects passed selection criteria: 76953
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 70333
Average stars matched: 67997.8 (96.6797 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2002384 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 15 19:22:19 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-155-g87a29d73
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 16 01:07:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461237.63623466
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:06.461 -25:59:11.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:06.461 -25:59:11.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0189 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:03.736 -25:59:41.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:03.736 -25:59:41.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0305 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:06.461 -25:59:11.46
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:03.736 -25:59:41.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01321 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6V2l1nxJw3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EJ8Y3vjfqz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DWRaAwHnsx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wK66W1vIoc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8280 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3888 to 253.5783 deg, Dec -31.4733 to -20.0780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3888 to 253.5783 deg, Dec -31.4733 to -20.0780 deg
Loaded 8529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5455 out of 5650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5650 out of 8280 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.642300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.642300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8280 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3888 to 253.5783 deg, Dec -31.4733 to -20.0780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3888 to 253.5783 deg, Dec -31.4733 to -20.0780 deg
Loaded 8529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5455 out of 5650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5650 out of 8280 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 8132 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.4159 to 253.5795 deg, Dec -31.4777 to -20.1160 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.4159 to 253.5795 deg, Dec -31.4777 to -20.1160 deg
Loaded 8512 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5601 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5601 out of 8132 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.3 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
3.7 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
3.7 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.5 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6V2l1nxJw3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=612, bad_region=0, passed=8280
Got 8280 stars (including 7650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8025 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=153 n_q2=241 n_q3=283 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EJ8Y3vjfqz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=620, bad_region=1, passed=8132
Got 8132 stars (including 7493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=152 n_q2=242 n_q3=291 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DWRaAwHnsx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=415, bad_region=0, passed=8125
Got 8125 stars (including 7704 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8125 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=282 n_q2=279 n_q3=250 n_q4=154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.417
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wK66W1vIoc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, bad_region=0, passed=8203
Got 8203 stars (including 7770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8022 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=282 n_q2=277 n_q3=248 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.478
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.297
ref2=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.174
new1=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.417
new2=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.478
reference average sigma_overall=0.3965 worst_q_ratio=1.2355
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:11:44.72 -22:09:02.3: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:57:10.23 -20:34:45.1: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:43:47.62 -28:10:56.2: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:57:10.23 -20:34:45.1: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:11:44.72 -22:09:02.3: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:43:47.62 -28:10:56.2: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:44.72 -22:09:02.3: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4994 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:15:28.16 -22:58:11.0: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:21:39.34 -25:36:49.7: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:21:28.81 -23:32:39.1: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:14:48.33 -25:23:34.4: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:15:49.44 -24:10:54.8: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:20:14.60 -23:04:53.2: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:15:28.16 -22:58:11.0: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:28.16 -22:58:11.0: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5071 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:21:39.34 -25:36:49.7: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:39.34 -25:36:49.7: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5296 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:14:48.33 -25:23:34.4: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:48.33 -25:23:34.4: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5289 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:15:49.44 -24:10:54.8: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:49.44 -24:10:54.8: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5433 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:20:14.60 -23:04:53.2: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:21:28.81 -23:32:39.1: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:14.60 -23:04:53.2: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5352 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:28.81 -23:32:39.1: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5929 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:14:49.46 -21:57:10.1: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:31:53.52 -26:36:18.2: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:31:53.52 -26:36:18.2: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:53.52 -26:36:18.2: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5448 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:14:49.46 -21:57:10.1: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:49.46 -21:57:10.1: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5477 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:18:10.62 -22:24:11.4: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:10:52.93 -24:19:01.2: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:02:02.92 -21:23:20.0: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:08:37.07 -24:35:10.1: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:09:14.84 -23:21:08.0: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:16:16.36 -29:27:24.5: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:18:10.62 -22:24:11.4: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:10:52.93 -24:19:01.2: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:10.62 -22:24:11.4: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5787 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:52.93 -24:19:01.2: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5755 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:08:37.07 -24:35:10.1: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:37.07 -24:35:10.1: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5758 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:02:02.92 -21:23:20.0: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:02.92 -21:23:20.0: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5530 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:16:16.36 -29:27:24.5: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:16.36 -29:27:24.5: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6015 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:09:14.84 -23:21:08.0: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:14.84 -23:21:08.0: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5985 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:09:24.67 -23:30:38.1: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:56:27.54 -21:37:10.3: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:09:21.03 -21:52:41.0: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:56:27.54 -21:37:10.3: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:18:59.60 -23:17:45.8: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:12:28.82 -20:56:03.9: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:27.54 -21:37:10.3: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6023 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:13:13.31 -26:07:45.9: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:09:24.67 -23:30:38.1: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:08:02.75 -22:07:54.4: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:24.67 -23:30:38.1: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6239 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:09:21.03 -21:52:41.0: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:21.03 -21:52:41.0: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5773 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:12:28.82 -20:56:03.9: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:28.82 -20:56:03.9: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6249 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:18:59.60 -23:17:45.8: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:20:55.51 -22:37:07.5: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:59.60 -23:17:45.8: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6234 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:13:13.31 -26:07:45.9: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:13.31 -26:07:45.9: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6110 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:08:02.75 -22:07:54.4: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:02.75 -22:07:54.4: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6066 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:20:55.51 -22:37:07.5: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:55.51 -22:37:07.5: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6096 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:15:27.28 -23:05:55.3: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:16:03.24 -23:38:11.7: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:14:19.23 -24:29:40.8: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:15:27.28 -23:05:55.3: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:27.28 -23:05:55.3: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6209 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:24:06.55 -26:28:18.5: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:14:19.23 -24:29:40.8: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:19.23 -24:29:40.8: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6328 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:33:51.29 -26:41:24.4: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:16:03.24 -23:38:11.7: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:03.24 -23:38:11.7: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6020 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:11:43.88 -25:26:35.5: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:24:06.55 -26:28:18.5: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:06.55 -26:28:18.5: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6150 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:49:59.66 -23:33:40.0: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:49:55.94 -25:22:05.7: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:33:51.29 -26:41:24.4: 11.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:51.29 -26:41:24.4: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6846 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:49:55.94 -25:22:05.7: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:55.94 -25:22:05.7: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6832 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:05:07.01 -23:37:45.4: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:49:59.66 -23:33:40.0: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:59.66 -23:33:40.0: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6461 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:11:43.88 -25:26:35.5: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:43.88 -25:26:35.5: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6147 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:14:17.69 -25:09:20.8: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:05:07.01 -23:37:45.4: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:07.01 -23:37:45.4: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6810 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:14:17.69 -25:09:20.8: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:17.69 -25:09:20.8: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6569 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20580.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20579_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 20579_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 20580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20585_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20585_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:11.49 -28:27:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20587_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20587_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.83 -27:54:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20588_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20588_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:47.34 -28:45:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20598_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20598_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:31.65 -29:20:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20599_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20599_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:49.85 -25:16:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20600_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20600_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20601_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:26.17 -24:06:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20602_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20602_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:10.18 -24:14:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20603_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20604_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20605_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20605_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20606_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20606_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20607_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20607_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:43.99 -24:57:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20610_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20610_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20611_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20611_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20613_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20613_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20614_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20614_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20616_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20616_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20617_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20617_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20618_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20618_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20619_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20619_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20621_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20621_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20623_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20623_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20624_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20624_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:00.89 -28:20:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20625_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20625_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20626_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20626_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20627_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20627_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20628_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20628_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20629_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20629_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20630_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20631_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20632_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20632_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20633_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20634_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20635_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20635_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:04.11 -21:50:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20636_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20636_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:02.23 -25:53:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20637_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20637_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20639_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20639_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20640_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20640_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20642_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20642_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20643_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20643_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20646_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20646_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20649_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20649_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20651_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20651_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05107_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 05107_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:09.32 -28:22:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07776_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 07776_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:33.32 -29:41:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:43:47.62 -28:10:56.2
15:57:10.23 -20:34:45.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:06.461 -25:59:11.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:06.461 -25:59:11.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0189 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:03.736 -25:59:41.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:11.495 -25:59:08.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:03.736 -25:59:41.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0305 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:06.461 -25:59:11.46
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:03.736 -25:59:41.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01321 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E8H96XmChq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P1921JMNuh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HRaooeqSgK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FF8kDzXIXq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 83603 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3429 to 253.5796 deg, Dec -31.4740 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3429 to 253.5796 deg, Dec -31.4740 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8584 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6230 out of 6972 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6972 out of 83603 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.490400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.490400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 83603 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3429 to 253.5796 deg, Dec -31.4740 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3429 to 253.5796 deg, Dec -31.4740 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8584 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6230 out of 6972 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6972 out of 83603 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 83601 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3430 to 253.5841 deg, Dec -31.4846 to -20.0617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3430 to 253.5841 deg, Dec -31.4846 to -20.0617 deg
Loaded 8587 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6196 out of 6980 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6980 out of 83601 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 118 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.6 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.E8H96XmChq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4520, bad_region=3, passed=83596
Got 83596 stars (including 78919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=155 n_q2=259 n_q3=280 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.P1921JMNuh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4524, bad_region=6, passed=83586
Got 83586 stars (including 78883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83586 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=155 n_q2=263 n_q3=281 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HRaooeqSgK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3380, bad_region=5, passed=57963
Got 57963 stars (including 54493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.656 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=263 n_q2=275 n_q3=272 n_q4=162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.541
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FF8kDzXIXq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=3484, bad_region=5, passed=58590
Got 58590 stars (including 55017 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=264 n_q2=273 n_q3=274 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.491
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-16-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222105_TTUQ1b1x1_2600763_7fdowZ7V/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:01:47.18 -28:38:17.5: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:45:46.65 -30:55:49.8: 13.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:05:24.34 -23:25:16.4: 14.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:43:18.39 -29:59:13.0: 12.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:17:41.50 -22:53:48.6: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:43:18.30 -29:59:19.9: 12.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:25:16.89 -30:29:26.3: 12.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:42:35.69 -30:11:17.8: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:49:15.78 -28:19:34.2: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:43:18.39 -29:59:13.0: 12.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:01:47.18 -28:38:17.5: 12.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:05:24.34 -23:25:16.4: 14.22 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:18.39 -29:59:13.0: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0056 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:47.18 -28:38:17.5: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8009 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:17:41.50 -22:53:48.6: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:45:46.65 -30:55:49.8: 13.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:25:16.89 -30:29:26.3: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:43:18.30 -29:59:19.9: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:24.34 -23:25:16.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0433 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:46.65 -30:55:49.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5479 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:41.50 -22:53:48.6: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3425 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:16.89 -30:29:26.3: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9696 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:18.30 -29:59:19.9: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0818 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:42:35.69 -30:11:17.8: 13.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:35.69 -30:11:17.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.7701 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:49:15.78 -28:19:34.2: 13.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:15.78 -28:19:34.2: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8326 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:02:50.16 -21:20:52.7: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:27:07.51 -23:00:35.2: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:52:29.65 -25:23:10.8: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:02:50.16 -21:20:52.7: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:27:07.51 -23:00:35.2: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:43:52.26 -30:09:34.4: 14.85 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:27:43.82 -25:46:59.5: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:26:15.47 -27:26:55.5: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:48:06.69 -21:21:48.2: 14.77 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:52:29.65 -25:23:10.8: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:43:52.26 -30:09:34.4: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:27:43.82 -25:46:59.5: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:26:15.47 -27:26:55.5: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:43:52.26 -30:09:34.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=13.0635 delta=1.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:48:06.69 -21:21:48.2: 14.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:52:39.95 -22:04:17.5: 14.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:48:06.69 -21:21:48.2: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.4799 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:52:39.95 -22:04:17.5: 14.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:39.95 -22:04:17.5: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6866 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:51:58.59 -21:11:46.0: 13.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:51:58.59 -21:11:46.0: 13.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:58.59 -21:11:46.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7455 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:33:17.52 -28:47:51.0: 14.48 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:41:32.62 -23:39:57.0: 14.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:33:17.52 -28:47:51.0: 14.71 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:33:17.52 -28:47:51.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5499 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:52:15.68 -26:16:46.2: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:51:53.78 -26:08:39.8: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:41:32.62 -23:39:57.0: 13.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:32.62 -23:39:57.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7110 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:25:33.19 -30:08:49.5: 14.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:52:15.68 -26:16:46.2: 14.42 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:15.68 -26:16:46.2: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6729 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:51:53.78 -26:08:39.8: 14.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:53.78 -26:08:39.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6224 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:25:33.19 -30:08:49.5: 14.82 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:25:33.19 -30:08:49.5: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5434 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:51:30.98 -26:28:58.2: 13.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:52:23.73 -24:15:29.0: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:51:30.98 -26:28:58.2: 14.23 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:30.98 -26:28:58.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7384 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:45:56.79 -29:50:16.0: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:48:10.30 -24:48:16.9: 14.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:52:23.73 -24:15:29.0: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:48:10.30 -24:48:16.9: 14.72 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:10.30 -24:48:16.9: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7059 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:51:22.99 -24:40:01.4: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:45:56.79 -29:50:16.0: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:56.79 -29:50:16.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6929 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:05:07.93 -27:22:42.1: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:51:22.99 -24:40:01.4: 14.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:22.99 -24:40:01.4: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7738 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:05:07.93 -27:22:42.1: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:45:29.84 -28:07:21.1: 13.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:45:29.84 -28:07:21.1: 13.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:12:28.95 -24:08:09.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:29.84 -28:07:21.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6598 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:37:17.23 -22:44:28.1: 13.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:12:28.95 -24:08:09.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:47:48.13 -24:33:18.4: 14.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:37:17.23 -22:44:28.1: 14.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:17.23 -22:44:28.1: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9414 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:16:24.60 -30:38:53.1: 15.09 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:47:48.13 -24:33:18.4: 14.41 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:48.13 -24:33:18.4: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9599 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:16:24.60 -30:38:53.1: 14.61 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:16:24.60 -30:38:53.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8148 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:43:18.78 -21:08:20.7: 14.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:43:18.78 -21:08:20.7: 14.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:18.78 -21:08:20.7: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9759 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:28:13.53 -30:22:00.8: 14.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:42:17.85 -25:33:13.7: 14.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:28:13.53 -30:22:00.8: 14.73 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:13.53 -30:22:00.8: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8325 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:42:17.85 -25:33:13.7: 14.04 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:17.85 -25:33:13.7: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0688 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:27:32.01 -21:43:19.7: 14.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:27:32.01 -21:43:19.7: 14.08 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:32.01 -21:43:19.7: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0448 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:45:11.44 -25:22:18.9: 14.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:37:53.11 -23:47:09.5: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:45:11.44 -25:22:18.9: 14.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:11.44 -25:22:18.9: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0212 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:37:53.11 -23:47:09.5: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:53.11 -23:47:09.5: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1741 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:37:03.69 -25:41:30.1: 14.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:47:20.60 -25:04:57.9: 14.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:49:20.97 -22:21:58.9: 14.61 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:52:02.52 -22:38:38.8: 14.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:37:03.69 -25:41:30.1: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:03.69 -25:41:30.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9796 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:33:33.10 -26:47:59.0: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:47:20.60 -25:04:57.9: 14.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:20.60 -25:04:57.9: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9101 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 15:51:30.81 -25:58:32.1: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:49:20.97 -22:21:58.9: 14.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:20.97 -22:21:58.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1658 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:52:02.52 -22:38:38.8: 14.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:02.52 -22:38:38.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1845 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:33:33.10 -26:47:59.0: 14.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:33.10 -26:47:59.0: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0015 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 15:51:30.81 -25:58:32.1: 14.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:30.81 -25:58:32.1: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0477 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:31:23.36 -29:54:30.9: 13.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:31:23.36 -29:54:30.9: 13.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:31:23.36 -29:54:30.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.8031 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 16:52:39.28 -30:51:53.1: 12.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-52-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits at 16:52:39.28 -30:51:53.1: 13.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:39.28 -30:51:53.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5049 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101984.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101992.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102052.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102071.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102082.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102142.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101904.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101939.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101983.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102105.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58802.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101781_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101781_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101788_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101788_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101809_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101809_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101815_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101815_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:30.11 -25:30:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101820_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101820_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:15.82 -26:23:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101827_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101827_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101828_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101828_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101834_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101834_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101847_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101847_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101849_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101849_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101853_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101853_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101858_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101858_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101863_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101863_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:19.45 -28:35:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101871_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101871_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:47.66 -28:10:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101872_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101872_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:10.23 -20:34:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101887_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101887_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:23.81 -28:11:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101889_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101889_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:17.25 -28:44:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101900_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101900_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:24.58 -22:21:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101902_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101902_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101904_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 101904_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101913_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101913_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:51.70 -25:29:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101926_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101926_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:39.86 -23:14:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101927_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 101927_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101929_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101929_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:42.89 -25:43:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101934_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101934_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:50.25 -27:11:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101938_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101938_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:16.70 -26:00:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101939_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 101939_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101942_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101942_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:54.78 -30:39:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101945_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101945_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:42.85 -23:18:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101962_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101962_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:28.80 -29:05:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101965_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101965_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:30.88 -26:35:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101970_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101970_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:32.11 -21:38:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101983_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 101983_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101984_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101984_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:52.26 -30:09:34.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.849 6031196078705742336 250.96833846100 -30.16016188470 13.9186 12.2541 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.849#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101991_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 101991_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101992_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 101992_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:06.69 -21:21:48.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.297 4126901312997429248 252.02787946852 -21.36330649351 13.5280 12.9832 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.297#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102000_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102000_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:42.35 -21:20:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102006_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102006_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:28.03 -26:55:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102023_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102023_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:34.54 -25:11:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102027_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102027_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:44.78 -23:43:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102029_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102029_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102032_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102032_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:20.17 -29:18:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102033_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102033_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:52.52 -29:16:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102037_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102037_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102042_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102042_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:59.40 -21:01:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102045_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102045_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:13.87 -28:41:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102049_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102049_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:00.47 -25:26:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102050_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102050_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:43.19 -25:48:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102052_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102052_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:17.52 -28:47:51.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.730 6044000888021758592 248.32322841814 -28.79746815815 12.6748 11.2359 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.730#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102055_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102055_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:24.15 -25:55:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102061_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102061_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102064_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102064_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:05.27 -30:47:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102065_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102065_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102070_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102070_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102071_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102071_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:33.19 -30:08:49.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.059 6037854785516254720 246.38817569907 -30.14764639334 12.3904 10.8610 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.059#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102072_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102072_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102078_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102078_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:21.80 -21:57:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102082_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102082_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:23.73 -24:15:29.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.781 4125323994857156736 253.09921183386 -24.25766776680 14.6387 12.9331 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.781#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102087_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102087_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102088_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102088_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102089_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102089_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102092_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 102092_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102097_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102097_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:08.29 -29:23:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102099_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102099_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102105_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 102105_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102116_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102116_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:26.87 -23:21:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102124_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102124_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102140_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102140_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102142_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102142_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:24.60 -30:38:53.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.211 6037591692998658432 244.10351071033 -30.64828153936 13.0474 11.6269 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.211#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102147_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102147_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102156_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102156_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:29.20 -27:31:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102159_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102159_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102162_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102162_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102163_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102163_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102164_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102164_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102167_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102167_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102168_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102168_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102174_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102174_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102180_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102180_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102191_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102191_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102203_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102203_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102245_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 102245_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45009_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 45009_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:37.61 -26:45:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77182_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 77182_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.84 -27:54:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31038_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 31038_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:25.37 -25:33:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22964_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 22964_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:26.15 -24:06:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27581_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 27581_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:10.22 -24:14:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42330_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 42330_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:47.46 -26:44:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 18253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:41.62 -23:24:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58802_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 58802_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76964_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 76964_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:50.90 -28:14:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93814_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 93814_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:42.89 -29:42:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93687_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 93687_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.95 -25:32:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54243_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 54243_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:11.47 -28:27:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80598_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 80598_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:29.81 -27:44:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29104_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 29104_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:49.84 -25:16:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67136_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 67136_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.43 -30:01:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97735_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 97735_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:51.20 -22:42:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51426_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 51426_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97263_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 97263_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:47.33 -28:45:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 12580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:52.34 -22:49:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29336_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 29336_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:14.64 -25:04:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100152_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 100152_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:42.17 -24:05:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37127_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 37127_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:54.53 -26:16:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29438_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 29438_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:49.84 -24:42:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83550_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 83550_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:58.51 -27:31:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16635_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 16635_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:15.65 -22:44:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58315_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 58315_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:40.79 -29:53:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83055_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 83055_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:54.50 -27:29:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95523_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 95523_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:48.39 -28:31:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76748_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 76748_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:31.91 -28:12:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11090_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 11090_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:30.37 -22:37:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34360_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 34360_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:51.10 -25:56:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58398_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 58398_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:33.31 -29:41:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30250_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 30250_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:44.00 -24:57:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70028_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 70028_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:41.32 -28:39:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68696_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 68696_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:44.69 -29:25:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 98580_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_22-17-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
