NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Per-05-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Per-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Field Per-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Field Per-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Field Per-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Per-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Per-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Per-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 641432 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 641432 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.png' -> 'transient_report/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits_preview.png'
Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits

renamed 'Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.png' -> 'transient_report/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits_preview.png'
Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 551.5128 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 689.1023 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1972.5160 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 610.1050 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1982.7510 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 625.4970 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.57656 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.025 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.1399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-15T04:06:12.7515293' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-15T09:06:12.7515293' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61236.3793142475 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-15T09:06:22.6550003' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61236.3794288775 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 65.4531218879604 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 37.9996649637061 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.5722222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 53.6725 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.91647426644961 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Per-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 21 49' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20413 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20413 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.1399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.1399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 80.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 266.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/d_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits :) Spent 0.888991 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/d_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.0599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-15T04:06:49.9978826' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-15T09:06:49.9978826' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61236.3797453358 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-15T09:06:59.9027604' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61236.3798599769 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 65.4531218191466 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 37.9996649546359 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.6783333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 53.7402777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.88963986680822 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Per-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 21 49' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20413 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20413 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.0599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.0599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 80.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 266.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/d_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits :) Spent 0.890063 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/d_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits


fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461236.87942999 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits' wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits' wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:21:49.016 +37:59:51.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Image size: 941.4'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:21:50.559 +37:59:47.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:21:49.016 +37:59:51.53 Second-epoch image center 04:21:50.559 +37:59:47.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Image size: 941.3'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:21:50.938 +38:00:00.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:21:49.016 +37:59:51.53 Second-epoch image center 04:21:50.938 +38:00:00.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:21:50.559 +37:59:47.45 Second-epoch second image center 04:21:50.938 +38:00:00.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00391 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1xQ2Uv20sD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oNiHOxAC9P Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.riojCUGczw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PRXEnTGn47 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 18677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9675 to 76.3314 deg, Dec +32.1960 to +43.3146 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9675 to 76.3314 deg, Dec 32.1960 to 43.3146 deg Loaded 9189 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6388 out of 7129 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7129 out of 18677 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.973450 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.973450 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 18677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9675 to 76.3314 deg, Dec +32.1960 to +43.3146 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9675 to 76.3314 deg, Dec 32.1960 to 43.3146 deg Loaded 9189 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6388 out of 7129 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7129 out of 18677 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 18684 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9677 to 76.3318 deg, Dec +32.1958 to +43.3008 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9677 to 76.3318 deg, Dec 32.1958 to 43.3008 deg Loaded 9175 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6385 out of 7116 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7116 out of 18684 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 2.1 pix Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits 2.2 pix fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.2 pix fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 15.4 mag. Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits 14.0 mag. fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.1xQ2Uv20sD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1808, bad_region=4135, passed=18677 Got 18677 stars (including 13041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18677 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=346 n_q2=184 n_q3=200 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200 The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.oNiHOxAC9P (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1789, bad_region=4138, passed=18684 Got 18684 stars (including 13060 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18684 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=346 n_q2=188 n_q3=194 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187 The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.riojCUGczw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=137, bad_region=415, passed=2584 Got 2584 stars (including 2049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2584 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2190 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2190 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2190 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.644 n_q1=392 n_q2=8 n_q3=247 n_q4=317 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.769 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PRXEnTGn47 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=148, bad_region=416, passed=2570 Got 2570 stars (including 2021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2570 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.970 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=382 n_q2=14 n_q3=276 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.318 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.200 ref2=Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.187 new1=fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.613 worst_q_ratio=3.769 new2=fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits sigma_overall=0.594 worst_q_ratio=3.318 reference average sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.1935 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits) flagged: sigma=0.613 (ref avg 0.359), ratio=3.769 (ref avg 1.1935), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2. Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 2511 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1389379.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out1389379.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 73.2984 (6.80907e+31), 17 match, 0 conflict, 47 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (65.4279,38.0086), pixel scale 5.93298 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+--+---++--+---+----+--++--++------++---+------++---------+(best)------------------------------------ Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1389379.solved to indicate this. Field: out1389379.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (65.458883, 37.997185) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:21:50.132, +37:59:49.865). Field size: 15.7691 x 10.5416 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -1.63093 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits' WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 15 06:03 fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 15 06:03 out1389379.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits (fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1389379.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out1389379.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7167 degrees of RA,Dec (65.4599,37.998) Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100). log-odds ratio 98.8276 (8.32314e+42), 18 match, 0 conflict, 37 distractors, 52 index. RA,Dec = (65.4446,38.0015), pixel scale 5.94693 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--++-++-++++-----+--++-+----++---+-----------+-------+(best)--------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1389379.solved to indicate this. Field: out1389379.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (65.455317, 37.995010) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:21:49.276, +37:59:42.036). Field size: 15.7628 x 10.5417 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -1.61408 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 15 06:03 fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 15 06:03 out1389379.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 17722 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4603, 951.309] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 28.2553 (1.86681e+12), 3 match, 0 conflict, 4 distractors, 15 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++----+(best)-------------------------------------------------+-----------------------+-----+------------- --> log-odds 28.2553 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 26.9052 (4.83928e+11), 3 match, 0 conflict, 4 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++----+(best)-----------------------------+---------------+---+-----------------------+-----+------------- --> log-odds 26.9052 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 154.404 (1.13999e+67), 28 match, 0 conflict, 167 distractors, 53 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++---++----+--------+------+--------++----------++--+---+--------+------++------++----+------------- --> log-odds 154.404 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 339.067 (1.79789e+147), 50 match, 0 conflict, 180 distractors, 99 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++---+++++-----+---+--+-+-----+++--+-------++--+---+-++-----++-----++------++----+---+-+------- --> log-odds 339.067 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 611.294 (3.03212e+265), 93 match, 0 conflict, 258 distractors, 189 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++---+++++-++-+++--+--+++---+-+++--++---+--+++-+---+-++-----++-----+++-----++++--+--++++------+ --> log-odds 611.294 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1234.22 (inf), 181 match, 1 conflict, 293 distractors, 376 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++--++++++-++-+++++++++++++++++++-++++-+++-+++++---+-++--+-+++++-+-+++++-+-+++++++-+++++----+++ --> log-odds 1234.22 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2091.44 (inf), 342 match, 0 conflict, 549 distractors, 730 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-+++++++-++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-+-+++++++-++++++--++++ --> log-odds 2091.44 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3938.83 (inf), 696 match, 2 conflict, 1070 distractors, 1452 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-+++++++-++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++--++++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-++++++++++++++++--++++ --> log-odds 3938.83 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4603, 951.309] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 28.2553 (1.86681e+12), 3 match, 0 conflict, 4 distractors, 15 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++----+(best)-------------------------------------------------+-----------------------+-----+------------- --> log-odds 28.2553 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 26.9052 (4.83928e+11), 3 match, 0 conflict, 4 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++----+(best)-----------------------------+---------------+---+-----------------------+-----+------------- --> log-odds 26.9052 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 154.404 (1.13999e+67), 28 match, 0 conflict, 167 distractors, 53 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++---++----+--------+------+--------++----------++--+---+--------+------++------++----+------------- --> log-odds 154.404 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 339.067 (1.79789e+147), 50 match, 0 conflict, 180 distractors, 99 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++---+++++-----+---+--+-+-----+++--+-------++--+---+-++-----++-----++------++----+---+-+------- --> log-odds 339.067 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 611.294 (3.03212e+265), 93 match, 0 conflict, 258 distractors, 189 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++---+++++-++-+++--+--+++---+-+++--++---+--+++-+---+-++-----++-----+++-----++++--+--++++------+ --> log-odds 611.294 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1234.22 (inf), 181 match, 1 conflict, 293 distractors, 376 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++--++++++-++-+++++++++++++++++++-++++-+++-+++++---+-++--+-+++++-+-+++++-+-+++++++-+++++----+++ --> log-odds 1234.22 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2091.44 (inf), 342 match, 0 conflict, 549 distractors, 730 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-+++++++-++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-+-+++++++-++++++--++++ --> log-odds 2091.44 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3938.83 (inf), 696 match, 2 conflict, 1070 distractors, 1452 index. RA,Dec = (65.4543,37.9942), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-+++++++-++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++--++++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-++++++++++++++++--++++ --> log-odds 3938.83 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (65.458454, 37.995764) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:21:50.029, +37:59:44.749). Field size: 15.7651 x 10.5409 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -1.62376 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Generating wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Image size: 942.7'x625.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:21:50.274 +37:59:47.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 2584 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1421214.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=137, bad_region=415, passed=2584 Got 2584 stars (including 2049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2584 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.19" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2172 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2172 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.99" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2173 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74" Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1048) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.927 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.868 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.840 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.822 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.883 n_q1=384 n_q2=8 n_q3=247 n_q4=317 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=7.379 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits): sigma 0.613->0.927, ratio 3.769->7.379; reverting to order 3 WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits) flagged: sigma=0.594 (ref avg 0.359), ratio=3.318 (ref avg 1.1935), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2. Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 2483 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1422396.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out1422396.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 62.3092 (1.14954e+27), 16 match, 0 conflict, 50 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (65.4294,38.0122), pixel scale 5.93277 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +----+--+----+--+---+----+--++--++------+-----------+----+------++(best)-----------+---------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1422396.solved to indicate this. Field: out1422396.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (65.456631, 38.000241) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:21:49.591, +38:00:00.868). Field size: 15.7605 x 10.5386 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -1.61687 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 15 06:03 fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 15 06:03 out1422396.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1422396.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out1422396.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7017 degrees of RA,Dec (65.4577,38.0011) Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100). log-odds ratio 57.7049 (1.1506e+25), 13 match, 0 conflict, 48 distractors, 52 index. RA,Dec = (65.4485,38.0078), pixel scale 5.94959 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+-----++----+-----+------+-+-----+---+-----+-------------+(best)--------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1422396.solved to indicate this. Field: out1422396.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (65.455769, 37.999565) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:21:49.385, +37:59:58.434). Field size: 15.7688 x 10.5422 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -1.6041 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 15 06:03 fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 15 06:04 out1422396.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 17464 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.474, 951.514] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 32.8044 (1.76509e+14), 4 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 15 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-+---+-+(best)--------------------------+------+--------------------------------------------------- --> log-odds 32.8044 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 38.6052 (5.8346e+16), 7 match, 0 conflict, 42 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-+---+-+---------------------+----+------+(best)--------------------------+------------------------ --> log-odds 38.6052 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 171.438 (2.84734e+74), 26 match, 0 conflict, 135 distractors, 53 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-+---+-+--++-----+---+-------+----+------+-------+-++----++-------+-+------------------------ --> log-odds 171.438 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 335.336 (4.31069e+145), 49 match, 0 conflict, 209 distractors, 99 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+---+-+--++++--++--+--++--+-------+-+--+-+----+++-+---+-++----+++------+-+--------------+--------+ --> log-odds 335.336 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 620.971 (4.83402e+269), 88 match, 0 conflict, 217 distractors, 189 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+---+-+--++++--++-++--+++-++------+++-++++----+++-+---+-++----+++++---++++--------+-+-+++-+---++-+ --> log-odds 620.971 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1167.65 (inf), 176 match, 0 conflict, 356 distractors, 376 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++-+--++++--++-+++++++-++++++--+++++++++--++++++-+-+-+++-+-+++++--++++++---+---+-+++++++---++++ --> log-odds 1167.65 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2084.01 (inf), 343 match, 0 conflict, 643 distractors, 730 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++-+--++++-+++-+++++++-++++++--+++++++++-+++++++-+++-+++-+-+++++-+++++++---+++++-+++++++---++++ --> log-odds 2084.01 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3582.07 (inf), 629 match, 1 conflict, 886 distractors, 1453 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++-+--++++-+++-+++++++-++++++--+++++++++-+++++++-+++-+++-+++++++-+++++++---+++++-+++++++---++++ --> log-odds 3582.07 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.474, 951.514] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 32.8044 (1.76509e+14), 4 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 15 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-+---+-+(best)--------------------------+------+--------------------------------------------------- --> log-odds 32.8044 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 38.6052 (5.8346e+16), 7 match, 0 conflict, 42 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-+---+-+---------------------+----+------+(best)--------------------------+------------------------ --> log-odds 38.6052 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 171.438 (2.84734e+74), 26 match, 0 conflict, 135 distractors, 53 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-+---+-+--++-----+---+-------+----+------+-------+-++----++-------+-+------------------------ --> log-odds 171.438 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 335.336 (4.31069e+145), 49 match, 0 conflict, 209 distractors, 99 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+---+-+--++++--++--+--++--+-------+-+--+-+----+++-+---+-++----+++------+-+--------------+--------+ --> log-odds 335.336 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 620.971 (4.83402e+269), 88 match, 0 conflict, 217 distractors, 189 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+---+-+--++++--++-++--+++-++------+++-++++----+++-+---+-++----+++++---++++--------+-+-+++-+---++-+ --> log-odds 620.971 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1167.65 (inf), 176 match, 0 conflict, 356 distractors, 376 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++-+--++++--++-+++++++-++++++--+++++++++--++++++-+-+-+++-+-+++++--++++++---+---+-+++++++---++++ --> log-odds 1167.65 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2084.01 (inf), 343 match, 0 conflict, 643 distractors, 730 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++-+--++++-+++-+++++++-++++++--+++++++++-+++++++-+++-+++-+-+++++-+++++++---+++++-+++++++---++++ --> log-odds 2084.01 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3582.07 (inf), 629 match, 1 conflict, 886 distractors, 1453 index. RA,Dec = (65.4547,37.9987), pixel scale 5.96186 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++-+--++++-+++-+++++++-++++++--+++++++++-+++++++-+++-+++-+++++++-+++++++---+++++-+++++++---++++ --> log-odds 3582.07 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (65.459458, 37.999216) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:21:50.270, +37:59:57.176). Field size: 15.7645 x 10.5407 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -1.61966 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Generating wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Image size: 942.4'x625.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:21:50.514 +38:00:00.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 2570 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1546462.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=148, bad_region=416, passed=2570 Got 2570 stars (including 2021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2570 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.01" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.901 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.818 sigma_q2_arcsec=3.672 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.882 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.817 n_q1=379 n_q2=14 n_q3=276 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.077 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits): sigma 0.594->0.901, ratio 3.318->4.077; reverting to order 3 WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=0.927 -- 2.58x the reference average (0.359); plate solution may be of low accuracy WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=0.901 -- 2.51x the reference average (0.359); plate solution may be of low accuracy WARNING: 1st new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=7.379 -- 6.18x the reference average (1.1935); plate solution may be of low accuracy WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.077 -- 3.42x the reference average (1.1935); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:21:49.016 +37:59:51.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Image size: 941.4'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:21:50.559 +37:59:47.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:21:49.016 +37:59:51.53 Second-epoch image center 04:21:50.559 +37:59:47.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Image size: 941.3'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:21:50.938 +38:00:00.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:21:49.016 +37:59:51.53 Second-epoch image center 04:21:50.938 +38:00:00.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:21:50.559 +37:59:47.45 Second-epoch second image center 04:21:50.938 +38:00:00.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00391 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rb9SBID6vY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HfHCZrIpcq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R78LbSKZJ4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AM7YVkFu5F Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 137281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9485 to 76.3479 deg, Dec +32.1670 to +43.3183 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9485 to 76.3479 deg, Dec 32.1670 to 43.3183 deg Loaded 9238 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5252 out of 7196 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7196 out of 137281 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 137281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9485 to 76.3479 deg, Dec +32.1670 to +43.3183 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9485 to 76.3479 deg, Dec 32.1670 to 43.3183 deg Loaded 9238 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5252 out of 7196 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7196 out of 137281 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 136522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9488 to 76.3480 deg, Dec +32.1450 to +43.3092 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9488 to 76.3480 deg, Dec 32.1450 to 43.3092 deg Loaded 9248 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5268 out of 7193 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7193 out of 136522 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 2.0 pix Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits 2.1 pix fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.1 pix fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 15.6 mag. Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.rb9SBID6vY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=15371, bad_region=23033, passed=137258 Got 137258 stars (including 100558 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137258 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116517 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116515 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116517 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=318 n_q2=208 n_q3=206 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186 The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.HfHCZrIpcq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=15060, bad_region=22902, passed=136498 Got 136498 stars (including 100270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 136498 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116025 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116027 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=318 n_q2=207 n_q3=209 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127 The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.R78LbSKZJ4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1317, bad_region=2582, passed=25955 Got 25955 stars (including 22254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25955 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23401 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23401 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23400 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q2_arcsec=4.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.627 n_q1=389 n_q2=9 n_q3=259 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=6.804 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.AM7YVkFu5F (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1334, bad_region=2695, passed=25785 Got 25785 stars (including 22015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25785 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23153 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23151 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23151 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.656 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.814 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.656 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.698 n_q1=392 n_q2=14 n_q3=274 n_q4=284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.827 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:14:27.31 +41:13:48.0: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits at 04:14:27.31 +41:13:48.0: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:27.31 +41:13:48.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9333 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:16:26.48 +36:30:06.9: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-56-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0343.fits at 04:16:26.48 +36:30:06.9: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:26.48 +36:30:06.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3868 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157363_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 157363_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.93    04:16:45.82 +40:47:40.7   4258 4903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:16:45.90 +40:47:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157364_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 157364_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 15.37943    2461236.87943    13.94    04:14:27.08 +41:13:49.8   4007 5182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.93    04:14:27.54 +41:13:46.1   4008 5179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157372_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 157372_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.63    04:18:53.86 +41:32:48.4   4519 5350   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:18:53.85 +41:32:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157374_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 157374_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.61    03:58:56.38 +39:48:18.5   2163 4444   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157379_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 157379_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.05    04:28:51.01 +41:45:04.9   5645 5450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:28:51.02 +41:45:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157678_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 157678_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    10.83    04:39:37.21 +34:21:05.5   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157720_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 157720_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    10.98    04:41:09.25 +35:16:33.1   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 158067_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 158067_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    11.93    04:23:59.60 +41:56:25.6   5100 5572   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:23:59.64 +41:56:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 158497_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 158497_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    12.27    04:36:04.59 +36:07:50.1   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 158573_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 158573_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    12.46    04:40:22.78 +41:36:05.5   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 158788_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 158788_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    12.69    04:06:12.78 +33:51:13.5   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 158983_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 158983_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    12.80    04:24:24.69 +41:42:26.6   5144 5430   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:24:24.69 +41:42:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 159297_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 159297_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.02    04:27:24.18 +40:26:08.7   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 159769_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 159769_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.11    04:00:49.50 +33:56:57.3   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 159816_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 159816_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.34    04:17:51.83 +42:00:22.5   4413 5633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:17:51.83 +42:00:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 159916_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 159916_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.37    04:01:57.83 +35:50:07.0   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 159965_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 159965_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.30    04:00:17.07 +38:14:51.4   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160000_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160000_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.31    04:16:23.98 +36:43:30.1   4108 2448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:16:23.99 +36:43:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160095_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160095_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.40    04:26:25.63 +41:00:35.4   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160213_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160213_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.39    04:16:21.73 +36:43:14.4   4103 2446   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:16:21.76 +36:43:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160240_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160240_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 15.37943    2461236.87943    13.40    04:16:26.53 +36:30:07.4   4108 2315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.38    04:16:26.42 +36:30:06.4   4107 2313   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160288_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160288_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.05    04:09:44.31 +37:26:43.5   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160340_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160340_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.62    04:18:19.93 +41:56:37.6   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160537_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160537_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.52    04:23:01.53 +40:39:51.7   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160629_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160629_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.51    04:24:58.72 +39:52:48.5   5184 4322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:24:58.80 +39:52:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160644_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160644_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.52    04:25:38.20 +40:26:33.8   5267 4661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:25:38.32 +40:26:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160857_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160857_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.66    04:10:46.12 +38:03:19.8   3475 3284   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:10:46.13 +38:03:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 160968_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 160968_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.43    04:27:38.98 +39:41:04.1   5492 4199   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:27:39.01 +39:41:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 161029_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 161029_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.41    04:40:11.45 +34:39:25.7   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 161052_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 161052_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.95    04:12:08.54 +38:02:43.0   3638 3269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:12:08.48 +38:02:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 161271_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 161271_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.32    04:36:30.32 +34:07:47.2   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 161335_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 161335_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.45    04:43:47.84 +38:05:03.5   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 161387_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 161387_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.76    04:33:09.47 +41:39:26.9   6131 5393   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:33:09.46 +41:39:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 161494_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 161494_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.97    04:14:34.44 +38:43:17.5   3947 3662   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:14:34.60 +38:43:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 161737_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 161737_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    14.22    04:33:18.26 +41:54:18.0   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 161738_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 161738_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    14.42    04:12:49.54 +38:26:45.6   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 161777_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 161777_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.92    04:14:16.30 +37:21:39.2   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87160_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 87160_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    13.54    04:16:01.36 +37:20:28.1   4079 2822   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:16:01.42 +37:20:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26987_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 26987_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    12.69    04:27:32.43 +41:47:01.7   5498 5471   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:27:32.49 +41:47:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 45725_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 45725_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    12.67    04:19:09.42 +40:45:47.0   4531 4874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:19:09.34 +40:45:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65245_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 The candidate 65245_fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 15.37986    2461236.87986    12.28    04:16:24.31 +39:25:44.1   4181 4080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Per-05-Q2b1x1_040730_TTUQ2b1x1_768817_Qn9JFPkc/fd_Per-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-15_04-06-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits **** FOUND 04:16:24.29 +39:25:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Per-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461236.87942999 -observatory V36 07:18:54.79 +17:13:17.8 Mercury (5.1mag) 10:32:25.71 +10:25:47.0 Venus (-4.1mag) 04:39:04.93 +22:00:27.3 Mars (1.3mag) 08:21:15.18 +19:56:50.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:19.46 +03:21:56.5 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:08:10.23 +20:47:34.5 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:58.64 +00:20:05.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:30:26.83 -23:20:13.5 Pluto (14.4mag) 08:37:13.09 +19:58:36.8 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 15 06:00 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461236.87942999: 08:21:16.46 +19:56:47.7 Io (6.1mag) 08:21:20.29 +19:56:30.8 Europa (6.3mag) 08:21:08.04 +19:57:21.9 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:20:58.63 +19:57:49.6 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:19:33.19 +19:43:11.8 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:21:19.29 +19:56:35.4 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:18:53.90 +19:46:32.9 Elara (17.7mag) 08:24:56.36 +19:48:19.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:25:55.62 +20:02:40.2 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:29.69 +03:21:33.2 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:15.32 +03:21:49.8 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:55:44.83 +03:20:11.6 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:08.03 +03:22:16.7 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:13.45 +03:18:26.4 Phoebe (16.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 15 06:00 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461236.87942999: 17:53:11.63 -31:48:43.5 JWST 15:10:00.32 +52:37:13.8 Chandra 10:19:10.31 -57:30:51.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 15 06:00 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461236.87942999 -observatory V36 02:43:20.96 +15:00:58.5 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:14:10.56 -34:29:17.9 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:30:42.00 -68:13:34.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:02:32.24 +32:32:01.0 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:14:34.86 +17:08:38.6 15.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:56:25.14 +32:15:37.8 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:18:06.30 +26:52:43.1 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:59:55.23 +29:33:18.2 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:12:59.78 +05:05:21.8 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:04:12.37 +21:05:15.4 18.0mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:11:10.46 -11:30:30.3 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:01.33 +67:33:31.3 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:21:18.13 -10:36:03.0 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:09:27.19 +65:59:02.0 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:39:21.10 +30:15:19.4 14.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:14:00.36 +15:26:52.0 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:34:49.24 +40:19:52.3 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:42:12.13 +46:44:18.4 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:54:21.40 -13:34:45.5 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:38:41.95 +28:13:50.1 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:17:47.23 -13:21:00.6 16.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:02:00.10 +22:12:52.6 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:46:23.47 +03:42:51.6 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:38:13.33 +79:09:56.8 17.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:51:25.16 +45:27:07.6 16.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:28:47.37 +05:24:25.4 17.0mag A/2026 E1 21:26:49.34 -16:57:00.2 7.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:15:51.74 -02:06:31.5 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:07:22.82 +30:05:40.7 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:18:34.19 +12:24:14.3 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:50:24.23 -05:03:02.5 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:39:32.67 +20:25:04.3 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:30:18.81 +11:17:03.8 16.3mag 88P/Howell 06:50:24.19 +30:12:30.6 15.8mag 93P/Lovas 04:37:23.66 +31:17:24.7 16.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:20:58.96 +30:07:28.6 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:57:32.82 -00:51:14.3 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 04:59:47.26 +20:56:49.2 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:45:42.51 +19:39:40.9 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 00:02:46.85 +03:07:05.0 17.9mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 07:31:44.79 +15:54:54.5 16.2mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:18:50.35 -20:42:03.0 15.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 05:51:12.06 +34:58:36.0 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:49:57.26 +18:21:54.2 14.3mag 169P/NEAT 01:52:55.29 +08:08:11.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:30.96 -08:36:00.2 17.1mag 235P/LINEAR 08:55:50.60 +32:49:34.3 18.0mag 240P/NEAT 20:39:42.85 -50:37:07.2 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:13:26.00 +14:26:46.2 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 05:52:31.35 +37:12:52.1 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:28.66 +05:35:59.4 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:39:07.97 +19:28:10.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:59:38.54 +38:47:47.3 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.6K Jul 15 06:00 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 15 06:00 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 15 06:00 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:55:10.916 -09:14:51.55 AT 2026ucl 2026-07-09.34 22.9896 22:52:15.743 -04:41:29.64 AT 2026uck 2026-07-09.34 23.1928 22:46:43.368 -03:32:01.51 AT 2026ucj 2026-07-09.34 22.7409 23:43:32.293 +00:25:54.12 AT 2026uci 2026-07-09.41 22.5705 22:59:36.577 -09:23:04.69 AT 2026uch 2026-07-09.35 23.3216 22:48:22.334 -07:22:49.36 AT 2026ucg 2026-07-09.34 23.157 21:40:06.458 -09:02:32.86 AT 2026ucf 2026-07-09.34 22.7167 22:52:02.226 -02:27:22.89 AT 2026uce 2026-07-09.34 22.1261 22:46:33.362 -04:06:56.17 AT 2026ucd 2026-07-09.34 22.7186 22:56:54.106 -10:42:50.84 AT 2026ucc 2026-07-09.34 22.2051 22:53:25.731 -02:38:45.64 AT 2026ucb 2026-07-09.35 22.3845 20:21:20.446 -12:55:24.01 AT 2026uca 2026-07-09.24 22.8887 23:17:51.308 -00:47:18.69 AT 2026ubz 2026-07-09.38 21.8767 22:50:38.435 -08:50:23.60 AT 2026uby 2026-07-09.34 22.2275 22:47:24.698 -06:06:23.35 AT 2026ubx 2026-07-09.34 23.256 22:56:00.968 -11:40:11.78 AT 2026ubw 2026-07-09.34 22.1585 23:24:42.862 +02:16:46.36 AT 2026ubv 2026-07-09.41 22.7993 22:45:14.951 -12:30:44.06 AT 2026ubu 2026-07-07.42 23.0269 21:48:25.112 -16:15:06.82 AT 2026ubt 2026-07-07.42 22.6297 22:49:23.723 -15:30:28.94 AT 2026ubs 2026-07-07.41 23.1172 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 15 06:00 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C