This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 15.2307* 20 30 06.74 -23 30 42.1 11.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AY Cap,2461236.7307,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AY Cap 20260715.2307 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.2307 2461236.7307 11.84 19:41:57.67 -21:43:19.3
18.29454 -20.46004 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa 1 0 1 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:41:57.67 -21:43:19.3: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:57.67 -21:43:19.3: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.7307,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.2307 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.2307 2461236.7307 13.24 20:01:28.91 -25:09:56.8
16.51699 -25.86621 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.66 Maja -0 0 0 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:01:28.91 -25:09:56.8: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:01:28.91 -25:09:56.8: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.7307,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.2307 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91910409 12.05.2026 10:03:20.593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
First image: 2461172.91910409 12.05.2026 10:03:20.593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Last image: 2461236.73183034 15.07.2026 05:33:40.141 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7642
Objects passed selection criteria: 7636
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7111.75
Average stars matched: 6875.25 (96.6745 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116340 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 15 03:17:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91910409 12.05.2026 10:03:20.593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
First image: 2461172.91910409 12.05.2026 10:03:20.593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Last image: 2461236.73183034 15.07.2026 05:33:40.141 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 104
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 51 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59090
Objects passed selection criteria: 58976
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53542.8
Average stars matched: 50918.2 (95.0983 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 167176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 15 03:21:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461236.72948971
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.466 -26:00:21.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:27.684 -25:59:36.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.466 -26:00:21.03
Second-epoch image center 20:09:27.684 -25:59:36.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0351 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:26.077 -25:59:00.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.466 -26:00:21.03
Second-epoch image center 20:09:26.077 -25:59:00.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0449 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:27.684 -25:59:36.83
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:26.077 -25:59:00.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01182 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JkqwrJwCMk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AliQtMzN1C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PFJeW7TWWs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OoMaRoARma
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5705 deg
Loaded 9432 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5929 out of 6055 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6055 out of 7571 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.600000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.600000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5705 deg
Loaded 9432 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5929 out of 6055 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6055 out of 7571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
4.3 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JkqwrJwCMk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, bad_region=0, passed=7571
Got 7571 stars (including 7092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.681 n_q1=232 n_q2=213 n_q3=269 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AliQtMzN1C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, bad_region=0, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=238 n_q2=214 n_q3=259 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PFJeW7TWWs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=266, bad_region=0, passed=6791
Got 6791 stars (including 6523 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6791 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=248 n_q2=198 n_q3=278 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OoMaRoARma (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, bad_region=0, passed=6774
Got 6774 stars (including 6336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6774 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=259 n_q2=205 n_q3=267 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.075
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits sigma_overall=0.517 worst_q_ratio=1.317
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.314
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.286
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.075
reference average sigma_overall=0.5305 worst_q_ratio=1.3155
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:39:25.49 -22:02:43.1: 11.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:06:56.29 -28:35:33.0: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:41:38.76 -20:53:44.1: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:56.29 -28:35:33.0: 11.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:38.76 -20:53:44.1: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:25.49 -22:02:43.1: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:56.29 -28:35:33.0: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1732 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:25.49 -22:02:43.1: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5696 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:38.76 -20:53:44.1: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3040 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:53:50.69 -21:27:11.9: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:41:28.60 -20:50:52.4: 11.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:09:03.22 -23:52:03.6: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:50.69 -21:27:11.9: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:50.69 -21:27:11.9: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6112 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:28.60 -20:50:52.4: 11.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:28.60 -20:50:52.4: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6550 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:09:03.22 -23:52:03.6: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:03.22 -23:52:03.6: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5335 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20439_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20439_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.66 -22:18:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20447_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20447_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.31 -28:31:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20533_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20533_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:57.54 -24:53:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20550_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 20550_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20563_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20563_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20575_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20575_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20616_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20616_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:29.53 -22:58:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20631_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:09.30 -22:25:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20641_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20646_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20646_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.02 -28:46:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20656_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20656_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20658_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20658_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20663_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 20663_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01592_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 01592_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:02.83 -28:47:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.466 -26:00:21.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:27.684 -25:59:36.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.466 -26:00:21.03
Second-epoch image center 20:09:27.684 -25:59:36.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0351 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:26.077 -25:59:00.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.466 -26:00:21.03
Second-epoch image center 20:09:26.077 -25:59:00.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0449 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:27.684 -25:59:36.83
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:26.077 -25:59:00.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01182 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j0qmuvywIY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gMY7s56dkb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oa6vB79czd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1QSyCBRRYg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59035 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3408 to 311.4613 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5512 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3408 to 311.4613 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5512 deg
Loaded 9470 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7531 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 59035 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.437700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.437700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59035 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3408 to 311.4613 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5512 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3408 to 311.4613 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5512 deg
Loaded 9470 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7531 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 59035 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
3.8 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.j0qmuvywIY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2720, bad_region=0, passed=59023
Got 59023 stars (including 56224 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59023 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.704 n_q1=245 n_q2=206 n_q3=255 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gMY7s56dkb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2722, bad_region=2, passed=59768
Got 59768 stars (including 56968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.690 n_q1=249 n_q2=208 n_q3=247 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oa6vB79czd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1808, bad_region=2, passed=38798
Got 38798 stars (including 36943 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38798 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=240 n_q2=189 n_q3=289 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1QSyCBRRYg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2185, bad_region=1, passed=58128
Got 58128 stars (including 55836 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=259 n_q2=208 n_q3=265 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-30-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-15_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_004309_TTUQ1b1x1_2046752_OmNZBUg9/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:53:29.52 -26:21:01.5: 13.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:55:59.09 -20:50:58.0: 13.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:01:46.07 -22:15:44.2: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:40:42.68 -25:57:12.7: 13.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:40:29.41 -21:32:08.3: 12.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:24:22.01 -29:09:44.2: 13.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:41:30.17 -23:55:38.1: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:39:55.61 -27:54:46.8: 13.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:29.52 -26:21:01.5: 13.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:25:20.46 -29:28:55.4: 13.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:29.52 -26:21:01.5: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2197 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:59.09 -20:50:58.0: 13.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:59.09 -20:50:58.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0552 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:01:46.07 -22:15:44.2: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:46.07 -22:15:44.2: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5321 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:42.68 -25:57:12.7: 13.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:42.68 -25:57:12.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1416 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:55.61 -27:54:46.8: 13.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:55.61 -27:54:46.8: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1265 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:29.41 -21:32:08.3: 12.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:30.17 -23:55:38.1: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:29.41 -21:32:08.3: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7411 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:30.17 -23:55:38.1: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9591 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:24:22.01 -29:09:44.2: 13.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:25:20.46 -29:28:55.4: 13.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:22.01 -29:09:44.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3671 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:20.46 -29:28:55.4: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0303 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:41:57.67 -21:43:19.3: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:43:39.09 -21:56:15.1: 12.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:36:46.61 -25:37:51.5: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:13:51.89 -30:41:23.0: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:06:10.31 -21:55:28.4: 13.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:57.67 -21:43:19.3: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:38:30.46 -27:32:34.0: 13.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:46.61 -25:37:51.5: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:39.09 -21:56:15.1: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.61 -25:37:51.5: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8079 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.09 -21:56:15.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4162 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:13:51.89 -30:41:23.0: 12.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:51.89 -30:41:23.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7176 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:37:39.79 -30:00:13.3: 13.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:10.31 -21:55:28.4: 13.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:10.31 -21:55:28.4: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9987 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:43:36.03 -26:15:55.6: 13.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:38:30.46 -27:32:34.0: 13.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:30.46 -27:32:34.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8225 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:42:07.65 -28:48:35.5: 13.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:37:39.79 -30:00:13.3: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:39.79 -30:00:13.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0486 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:36.03 -26:15:55.6: 13.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:36.03 -26:15:55.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1275 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:07.65 -28:48:35.5: 13.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:42:17.67 -21:56:26.3: 13.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:07.65 -28:48:35.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1356 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:01:28.91 -25:09:56.8: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:37:21.20 -22:12:52.9: 13.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:41:57.44 -26:48:36.5: 13.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:17.67 -21:56:26.3: 13.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:17.67 -21:56:26.3: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4796 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:54:01.12 -22:27:48.0: 13.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:41:36.17 -29:02:34.4: 13.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:37:21.20 -22:12:52.9: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:01:28.91 -25:09:56.8: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:21.20 -22:12:52.9: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4714 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:57.44 -26:48:36.5: 14.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:57.44 -26:48:36.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3374 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:01.12 -22:27:48.0: 13.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:01.12 -22:27:48.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5074 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:38:45.18 -21:14:14.5: 13.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:36.17 -29:02:34.4: 13.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:36.17 -29:02:34.4: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3737 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:42:54.92 -30:01:42.8: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:41:06.29 -21:23:27.3: 13.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:45.18 -21:14:14.5: 13.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:45.18 -21:14:14.5: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7136 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:38:52.60 -28:27:59.5: 13.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:54.92 -30:01:42.8: 13.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:54.92 -30:01:42.8: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2077 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:06.29 -21:23:27.3: 14.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:06.29 -21:23:27.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7139 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:42:50.34 -21:31:41.7: 13.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:38:52.60 -28:27:59.5: 13.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:41:15.09 -21:24:17.9: 14.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:52.60 -28:27:59.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3218 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:40:11.70 -27:11:12.5: 13.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:39:31.78 -21:13:13.2: 13.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:15.09 -21:24:17.9: 13.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:15.09 -21:24:17.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7400 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:11.70 -27:11:12.5: 13.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:50.34 -21:31:41.7: 13.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:11.70 -27:11:12.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5269 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:50.34 -21:31:41.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6314 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:38:42.27 -20:40:28.2: 14.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:31.78 -21:13:13.2: 14.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:31.78 -21:13:13.2: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6468 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:37:45.63 -22:30:48.8: 14.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:42.27 -20:40:28.2: 13.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:39:09.85 -21:32:38.7: 14.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:42.27 -20:40:28.2: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6110 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:37:45.63 -22:30:48.8: 14.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:45.63 -22:30:48.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6791 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:38:04.84 -20:43:13.8: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:43:12.70 -24:47:12.9: 14.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:09.85 -21:32:38.7: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:52:17.86 -22:11:54.6: 14.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:09.85 -21:32:38.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6581 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:41:35.09 -22:20:40.0: 13.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:39:18.69 -21:58:54.5: 13.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:04.84 -20:43:13.8: 14.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:04.84 -20:43:13.8: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6705 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:12.70 -24:47:12.9: 14.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:12.70 -24:47:12.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7117 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:52:17.86 -22:11:54.6: 14.46 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:17.86 -22:11:54.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7824 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:40:15.01 -21:50:53.4: 13.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:18.69 -21:58:54.5: 13.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:18.69 -21:58:54.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7491 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:35.09 -22:20:40.0: 13.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:51:10.02 -24:31:46.0: 14.64 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:35.09 -22:20:40.0: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6527 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:15.01 -21:50:53.4: 13.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:15.01 -21:50:53.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8885 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:10.02 -24:31:46.0: 14.72 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:10.02 -24:31:46.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.9083 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:41:33.38 -22:14:19.7: 14.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:40:35.60 -24:25:07.9: 13.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:40:30.38 -21:22:41.0: 14.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:33.38 -22:14:19.7: 14.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:39:47.12 -21:45:31.5: 14.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:33.38 -22:14:19.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9172 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 19:40:58.66 -20:43:39.4: 14.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:42:29.89 -23:04:35.8: 14.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:35.60 -24:25:07.9: 14.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:35.60 -24:25:07.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8181 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:30.38 -21:22:41.0: 14.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:47.12 -21:45:31.5: 14.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:30.38 -21:22:41.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9376 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:47.12 -21:45:31.5: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9307 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:39:36.78 -22:02:53.7: 14.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:42:16.28 -22:52:16.6: 14.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:58.66 -20:43:39.4: 14.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:58.66 -20:43:39.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9906 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:29.89 -23:04:35.8: 14.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:29.89 -23:04:35.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7200 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:36.78 -22:02:53.7: 14.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:16.28 -22:52:16.6: 13.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:36.78 -22:02:53.7: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8656 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:16.28 -22:52:16.6: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7137 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:01:27.13 -22:42:08.0: 14.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:40:57.63 -21:42:23.6: 13.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:33:30.00 -21:10:48.2: 14.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:01:27.13 -22:42:08.0: 14.12 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:27.13 -22:42:08.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9230 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:39:45.90 -21:27:16.9: 13.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:39:52.75 -22:11:04.4: 14.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:57.63 -21:42:23.6: 14.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:57.63 -21:42:23.6: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7680 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:35:55.37 -22:13:45.1: 14.42 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits at 20:34:56.98 -23:19:44.9: 14.44 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:33:30.00 -21:10:48.2: 14.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:30.00 -21:10:48.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0226 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:45.90 -21:27:16.9: 14.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:52.75 -22:11:04.4: 14.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:45.90 -21:27:16.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8596 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:52.75 -22:11:04.4: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7773 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:34:56.98 -23:19:44.9: 14.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:35:55.37 -22:13:45.1: 14.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:56.98 -23:19:44.9: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0208 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:55.37 -22:13:45.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0066 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75031.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75940.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74680_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74680_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74698_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74698_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74701_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74701_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74706_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74706_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74709_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74709_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74714_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74714_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74716_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74716_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74726_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74726_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74728_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74728_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.66 -29:11:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74964_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 74964_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.03 -28:46:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75012_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75012_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:17.04 -27:05:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75031_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 75031_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75032_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75032_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.47 -23:25:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75219_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75219_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.22 -24:13:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75247_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75247_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.50 -23:10:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75253_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75253_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75461_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75461_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:01.19 -22:19:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75499_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75499_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75530_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75530_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75572_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75572_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75641_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75641_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75703_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75703_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:29.16 -30:48:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75793_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75793_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75812_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75812_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75823_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75823_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75891_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75891_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75940_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 75940_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75943_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75943_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75962_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75962_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75986_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75986_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75993_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 75993_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76004_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76004_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76016_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76016_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76018_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76018_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76023_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76023_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76038_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76038_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76043_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76043_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76045_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76045_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76046_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76046_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76047_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76047_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76049_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76049_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76076_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76076_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76082_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76082_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76090_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76090_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76131_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76131_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76134_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76134_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76144_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76144_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76146_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76146_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76155_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76155_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76162_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76162_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76163_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76163_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76165_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76165_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76167_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76167_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76178_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76178_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76181_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76181_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76192_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76192_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76194_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76194_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76196_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76196_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76202_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76202_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76220_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76220_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76236_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76236_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76240_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76240_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76268_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 76268_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04670_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 04670_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.31 -29:54:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 52691_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:38.47 -22:48:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14886_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 14886_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:57.81 -27:55:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50310_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 50310_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.64 -22:18:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25848_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 25848_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:48.73 -25:46:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09316_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 09316_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:02.83 -28:47:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11447_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 11447_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-15_00-33-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks