This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 11.49 20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6
74.77633 4.56224 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" V0341 Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.017 g Y 3.463 g 2425834.00000 351.300000000000 M5e-M7
ATTENTION: measured mag 11.49 is 4.1 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 15.55 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0341 Cyg,2461236.6545,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0341 Cyg 20260715.1545 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 11.94 19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9
75.36448 6.74164 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" ASAS J195248+4032.0
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.272 V Y 0.800 V 121.400000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J195248+4032.0,2461236.6545,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J195248+4032.0 20260715.1545 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.05 20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4
75.27073 2.50043 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" CzeV1360
Type: EB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.210 V 12.350 V 2458049.89000 2.332090000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CzeV1360,2461236.6545,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CzeV1360 20260715.1545 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.28 19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8
68.38119 11.27299 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" NSVS J1915507+363222
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.921 R1 Y 0.592 R1 318.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1915507+363222,2461236.6545,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1915507+363222 20260715.1545 12.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.28 19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7
67.12259 9.82744 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2049601107114050688 | 19:19:31.84 +34:47:20.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2049601107114050688,2461236.6545,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2049601107114050688 20260715.1545 12.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.29 19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5
67.09056 9.68137 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.34 19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8
65.40271 10.54920 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" ASASSN-V J191251.24+333522.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.360 V 13.970 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J191251.24+333522.0,2461236.6545,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J191251.24+333522.0 20260715.1545 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 11.09 20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6
74.44738 1.95788 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" KS Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 pg < 17.000 pg 2437572.00000 311.260000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KS Cyg,2461236.6545,11.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KS Cyg 20260715.1545 11.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.61 19:05:59.20 +33:44:12.7
64.91920 11.90518 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:05:59.20 +33:44:12.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:05:59.20 +33:44:12.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:05:59.20 +33:44:12.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.40 19:55:54.49 +36:01:05.4
71.77582 3.91639 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | HAT 199-10963 | 19:55:56.52 +36:01:23.4 (Gaia DR3) | SR (local) | 162.821452100000 (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE SpType: M8 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:55:54.49 +36:01:05.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:55:54.49 +36:01:05.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-10963,2461236.6545,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-10963 20260715.1545 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.43 19:57:05.69 +33:58:50.7
70.15524 2.65443 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:57:05.69 +33:58:50.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:57:05.69 +33:58:50.7: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:57:05.69 +33:58:50.7: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.56 19:56:46.41 +35:59:37.0
71.84529 3.75383 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX24" ZTF J195646.93+360000.5
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.199 r Y 0.064 r 2458316.84220 0.148629000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:56:46.41 +35:59:37.0: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:56:46.41 +35:59:37.0: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J195646.93+360000.5,2461236.6545,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J195646.93+360000.5 20260715.1545 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.40 20:14:53.43 +37:42:45.6
75.24194 1.61508 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:14:53.43 +37:42:45.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:53.43 +37:42:45.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:53.43 +37:42:45.6: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.44 19:07:20.35 +38:09:50.3
69.16665 13.48835 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:07:20.35 +38:09:50.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.612+/- (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:07:20.35 +38:09:50.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:07:20.35 +38:09:50.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.44 19:05:37.69 +37:08:40.9
68.06781 13.38185 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J286.4202+37.1475 | 19:05:37.69 +37:08:40.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:05:37.69 +37:08:40.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:05:37.69 +37:08:40.9: 15.68 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.68 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J286.4202+37.1475,2461236.6545,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J286.4202+37.1475 20260715.1545 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.38 19:51:40.99 +32:53:40.5
68.64129 3.06423 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX21" Gaia DR3 2034693791057513344
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.820 G 15.860 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:51:40.99 +32:53:40.5: 15.57 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:51:40.99 +32:53:40.5: 15.65 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.22
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2034693791057513344,2461236.6545,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2034693791057513344 20260715.1545 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.45 19:01:14.44 +36:47:01.0
67.36348 14.03780 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:01:14.44 +36:47:01.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:01:14.44 +36:47:01.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:01:14.44 +36:47:01.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.48 19:12:53.67 +38:32:53.1
69.98776 12.65535 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX10" KIC 3432697
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.510 Kp Y 0.003 Kp 18.794000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:12:53.67 +38:32:53.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:12:53.67 +38:32:53.1: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KIC 3432697,2461236.6545,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KIC 3432697 20260715.1545 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.34 20:14:17.67 +37:15:27.7
74.79755 1.46132 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.5623+37.2593 | 20:14:17.67 +37:15:27.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:17.67 +37:15:27.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:17.67 +37:15:27.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.5623+37.2593,2461236.6545,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.5623+37.2593 20260715.1545 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.52 19:13:57.61 +35:33:05.2
67.30668 11.19106 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J288.4997+35.5466 | 19:13:57.61 +35:33:05.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:13:57.61 +35:33:05.2: 15.66 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:13:57.61 +35:33:05.2: 15.63 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.20
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J288.4997+35.5466,2461236.6545,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J288.4997+35.5466 20260715.1545 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.31 19:02:59.16 +37:16:18.9
67.96838 13.91440 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J285.7467+37.2729 | 19:02:59.16 +37:16:18.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:02:59.16 +37:16:18.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:02:59.16 +37:16:18.9: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J285.7467+37.2729,2461236.6545,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J285.7467+37.2729 20260715.1545 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.25 20:15:40.23 +37:20:43.4
75.02247 1.28240 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2060634289674808192 | 20:15:43.42 +37:20:50.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: em? 1975VatOP...1..197C VES 184
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:40.23 +37:20:43.4: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:40.23 +37:20:43.4: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060634289674808192,2461236.6545,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060634289674808192 20260715.1545 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.46 19:18:10.21 +39:01:25.7
70.87455 11.92563 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:18:10.21 +39:01:25.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:18:10.21 +39:01:25.7: 15.70 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:18:10.21 +39:01:25.7: 15.98 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.80 +/- 0.22
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.33 19:03:47.76 +33:52:42.7
64.85666 12.37785 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:03:47.76 +33:52:42.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F9 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:03:47.76 +33:52:42.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:03:47.76 +33:52:42.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.19 19:54:48.84 +33:27:25.4
69.46096 2.78956 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX20" Gaia DR3 2035110535984329600
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.770 G 18.360 G 0.573370000000
ATTENTION: measured mag 14.19 is 3.6 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 17.77 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:54:48.84 +33:27:25.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:54:48.84 +33:27:25.4: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2035110535984329600,2461236.6545,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2035110535984329600 20260715.1545 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.12 19:11:27.65 +37:45:58.2
69.13916 12.58421 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:11:27.65 +37:45:58.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:11:27.65 +37:45:58.2: 15.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:11:27.65 +37:45:58.2: 15.51 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.23 20:08:36.16 +40:14:37.9
76.69358 4.02291 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J302.1589+40.2333 | 20:08:36.16 +40:14:37.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:08:36.16 +40:14:37.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:08:36.16 +40:14:37.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J302.1589+40.2333,2461236.6545,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J302.1589+40.2333 20260715.1545 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.17 19:51:33.61 +34:35:18.3
70.08957 3.94746 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J297.8881+34.5869 | 19:51:33.61 +34:35:18.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:51:33.61 +34:35:18.3: 15.44 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:51:33.61 +34:35:18.3: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J297.8881+34.5869,2461236.6545,14.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J297.8881+34.5869 20260715.1545 14.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.12 20:01:31.21 +39:53:32.7
75.67257 4.98389 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J300.3789+39.8907 | 20:01:31.21 +39:53:32.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:01:31.21 +39:53:32.7: 15.39 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:01:31.21 +39:53:32.7: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J300.3789+39.8907,2461236.6545,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J300.3789+39.8907 20260715.1545 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.13 19:54:49.52 +33:33:00.8
69.54214 2.83552 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.7113+33.5471 | 19:54:49.52 +33:33:00.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:54:49.52 +33:33:00.8: 15.38 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:54:49.52 +33:33:00.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.7113+33.5471,2461236.6545,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.7113+33.5471 20260715.1545 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.13 20:14:21.69 +37:00:49.3
74.60172 1.31507 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.5787+37.0112 | 20:14:21.69 +37:00:49.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:21.69 +37:00:49.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:21.69 +37:00:49.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.5787+37.0112,2461236.6545,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.5787+37.0112 20260715.1545 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.03 20:15:42.52 +37:19:36.7
75.01129 1.26579 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.9281+37.3277 | 20:15:42.52 +37:19:36.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:42.52 +37:19:36.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:42.52 +37:19:36.7: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.9281+37.3277,2461236.6545,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.9281+37.3277 20260715.1545 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.09 19:39:02.54 +40:15:13.3
73.83044 8.89195 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" V0935 Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.600 pg < 17.700 pg 2433158.00000 365.000000000000 M7:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:39:02.54 +40:15:13.3: 15.76 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:39:02.54 +40:15:13.3: 15.89 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.82 +/- 0.23
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0935 Cyg,2461236.6545,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0935 Cyg 20260715.1545 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.17 20:09:41.80 +36:59:01.4
74.06519 2.07716 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX22" Gaia DR3 2059265608176439040
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.250 G 19.830 G 0.381874000000
ATTENTION: measured mag 14.17 is 5.1 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 19.25 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:09:41.80 +36:59:01.4: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:09:41.80 +36:59:01.4: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2059265608176439040,2461236.6545,14.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2059265608176439040 20260715.1545 14.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.13 20:01:30.32 +36:54:45.9
73.12834 3.42167 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX20" Gaia DR3 2060132298237979520
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.000 G 14.030 G A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:01:30.32 +36:54:45.9: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:01:30.32 +36:54:45.9: 15.30 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060132298237979520,2461236.6545,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060132298237979520 20260715.1545 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.01 20:17:05.62 +37:29:30.3
75.30169 1.12963 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J304.2720+37.4944 | 20:17:05.62 +37:29:30.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:17:05.62 +37:29:30.3: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:17:05.62 +37:29:30.3: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J304.2720+37.4944,2461236.6545,14.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J304.2720+37.4944 20260715.1545 14.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.03 20:14:21.27 +37:01:30.5
74.61048 1.32257 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX23" ZTF J201421.53+370153.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.825 g Y 0.739 g 2458279.13610 97.995148700000
ATTENTION: measured mag 14.03 is 4.1 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 18.09 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:21.27 +37:01:30.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:21.27 +37:01:30.5: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J201421.53+370153.5,2461236.6545,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J201421.53+370153.5 20260715.1545 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.02 20:13:22.09 +37:12:41.4
74.65710 1.58944 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX17" Gaia DR3 2060735105471874944
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.810 G 18.450 G 0.416620000000
ATTENTION: measured mag 14.02 is 3.8 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 17.81 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:22.09 +37:12:41.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:22.09 +37:12:41.4: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060735105471874944,2461236.6545,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060735105471874944 20260715.1545 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.06 20:15:44.63 +36:56:23.6
74.69370 1.04450 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX12" ZTF J201543.59+365625.2
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.480 r Y 0.082 r 2458336.84060 2.900190500000
ATTENTION: measured mag 14.06 is 4.3 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 18.40 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:44.63 +36:56:23.6: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:44.63 +36:56:23.6: 15.50 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J201543.59+365625.2,2461236.6545,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J201543.59+365625.2 20260715.1545 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.11 20:15:54.78 +38:09:25.1
75.72355 1.69445 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX16" ZTF J201553.39+380924.0
Type: BY
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.784 r Y 0.055 r 2458661.83620 2.472824900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:54.78 +38:09:25.1: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:54.78 +38:09:25.1: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J201553.39+380924.0,2461236.6545,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J201553.39+380924.0 20260715.1545 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.97 20:15:35.10 +37:24:33.3
75.06608 1.33206 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.9045+37.4014 | 20:15:35.10 +37:24:33.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:35.10 +37:24:33.3: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:35.10 +37:24:33.3: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.9045+37.4014,2461236.6545,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.9045+37.4014 20260715.1545 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.90 19:58:36.72 +39:28:59.2
75.02926 5.24847 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.6537+39.4826 | 19:58:36.72 +39:28:59.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:58:36.72 +39:28:59.2: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:58:36.72 +39:28:59.2: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.6537+39.4826,2461236.6545,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.6537+39.4826 20260715.1545 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.96 20:12:17.24 +36:35:52.2
74.02565 1.43190 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX18" Gaia DR3 2060681882235097984
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.530 G 14.580 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:12:17.24 +36:35:52.2: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:17.24 +36:35:52.2: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060681882235097984,2461236.6545,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060681882235097984 20260715.1545 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.89 19:54:55.49 +33:19:46.7
69.36356 2.70410 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX19" Gaia DR3 2034357267440080384
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.550 G 13.580 G A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:54:55.49 +33:19:46.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:54:55.49 +33:19:46.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2034357267440080384,2461236.6545,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2034357267440080384 20260715.1545 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.96 19:08:18.62 +39:27:54.2
70.46911 13.84462 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.3" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:08:18.62 +39:27:54.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:08:18.62 +39:27:54.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:08:18.62 +39:27:54.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.77 20:00:17.57 +37:05:23.7
73.15207 3.72072 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J300.0807+37.0974 | 20:00:17.95 +37:05:41.0 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:00:17.57 +37:05:23.7: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:00:17.57 +37:05:23.7: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J300.0807+37.0974,2461236.6545,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J300.0807+37.0974 20260715.1545 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.89 19:14:57.91 +34:30:46.2
66.44362 10.55650 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" ASASSN-V J191458.06+343053.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.290 V 15.180 V 2458355.74780 80.934264700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:14:57.91 +34:30:46.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:14:57.91 +34:30:46.2: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J191458.06+343053.3,2461236.6545,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J191458.06+343053.3 20260715.1545 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.74 20:14:34.29 +37:28:03.0
75.00278 1.53171 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.6430+37.4698 | 20:14:34.29 +37:28:03.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:34.29 +37:28:03.0: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:34.29 +37:28:03.0: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.6430+37.4698,2461236.6545,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.6430+37.4698 20260715.1545 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.83 20:14:50.60 +37:47:29.1
75.30231 1.66652 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:14:50.60 +37:47:29.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:50.60 +37:47:29.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:50.60 +37:47:29.1: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.81 19:50:57.50 +33:31:40.9
69.11053 3.51675 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2035155036187020160 | 19:51:00.09 +33:31:42.4 (Gaia DR3) | ROT (local) | (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:50:57.50 +33:31:40.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:50:57.50 +33:31:40.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2035155036187020160,2461236.6545,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2035155036187020160 20260715.1545 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.86 20:10:34.74 +36:41:29.2
73.91623 1.76986 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 2059199568766867328
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.330 G 16.390 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:10:34.74 +36:41:29.2: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:10:34.74 +36:41:29.2: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2059199568766867328,2461236.6545,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2059199568766867328 20260715.1545 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.79 20:00:33.98 +36:24:52.2
72.60459 3.31999 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" Gaia DR3 2059739836976905088
Type:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.760 G 18.750 G
ATTENTION: measured mag 13.79 is 4.0 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 17.76 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:00:33.98 +36:24:52.2: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:00:33.98 +36:24:52.2: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2059739836976905088,2461236.6545,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2059739836976905088 20260715.1545 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.75 20:09:02.71 +38:14:04.0
75.04644 2.86450 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J302.2554+38.2405 | 20:09:02.71 +38:14:04.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:09:02.71 +38:14:04.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:09:02.71 +38:14:04.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J302.2554+38.2405,2461236.6545,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J302.2554+38.2405 20260715.1545 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.77 19:43:57.51 +40:20:36.0
74.36288 8.11131 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX10" V1282 Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.900 pg < 21.000 pg 2433160.00000 270.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:43:57.51 +40:20:36.0: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:43:57.51 +40:20:36.0: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1282 Cyg,2461236.6545,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1282 Cyg 20260715.1545 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.71 20:10:55.05 +38:25:46.7
75.41035 2.66251 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J302.7490+38.4376 | 20:10:57.12 +38:26:05.6 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:10:55.05 +38:25:46.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:10:55.05 +38:25:46.7: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J302.7490+38.4376,2461236.6545,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J302.7490+38.4376 20260715.1545 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.76 20:16:56.65 +37:41:44.9
75.45428 1.26834 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.9" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX11" Gaia DR3 2060856979460839296
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.680 G 13.730 G B
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:56.65 +37:41:44.9: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:56.65 +37:41:44.9: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060856979460839296,2461236.6545,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060856979460839296 20260715.1545 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.84 20:14:51.28 +37:23:08.5
74.96587 1.43957 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.7173+37.3862 | 20:14:51.28 +37:23:08.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:51.28 +37:23:08.5: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:51.28 +37:23:08.5: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.7173+37.3862,2461236.6545,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.7173+37.3862 20260715.1545 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.66 20:05:36.73 +37:33:20.6
74.10862 3.06993 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J301.4095+37.5642 | 20:05:38.29 +37:33:51.3 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:05:36.73 +37:33:20.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:05:36.73 +37:33:20.6: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J301.4095+37.5642,2461236.6545,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J301.4095+37.5642 20260715.1545 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.64 19:09:50.36 +40:34:41.0
71.63973 14.02789 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.9" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J287.4560+40.5856 | 19:09:50.36 +40:34:41.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: K4III 2016AJ....151...13G LAMOST J190948.98+403456.9
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:09:50.36 +40:34:41.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:09:50.36 +40:34:41.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J287.4560+40.5856,2461236.6545,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J287.4560+40.5856 20260715.1545 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.65 20:12:26.56 +37:39:35.5
74.93035 1.98968 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" Gaia DR3 2060811246655670016
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.350 G 13.460 G 3.830290000000 F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:12:26.56 +37:39:35.5: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:26.56 +37:39:35.5: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060811246655670016,2461236.6545,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060811246655670016 20260715.1545 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.57 19:05:46.28 +38:32:20.1
69.39112 13.92137 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX25" KIC 3427759
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.890 Kp Y 0.005 Kp 7.146000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:05:46.28 +38:32:20.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:05:46.28 +38:32:20.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KIC 3427759,2461236.6545,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KIC 3427759 20260715.1545 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.56 19:17:51.83 +35:33:14.6
67.65982 10.47683 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J289.4641+35.5497 | 19:17:50.74 +35:33:07.0 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:17:51.83 +35:33:14.6: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:17:51.83 +35:33:14.6: 15.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J289.4641+35.5497,2461236.6545,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J289.4641+35.5497 20260715.1545 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.48 20:12:45.74 +36:41:24.1
74.15509 1.40304 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.1866+36.6836 | 20:12:44.18 +36:41:26.7 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:12:45.74 +36:41:24.1: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:45.74 +36:41:24.1: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.1866+36.6836,2461236.6545,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.1866+36.6836 20260715.1545 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.40 20:13:05.26 +36:39:01.0
74.15786 1.32670 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.2656+36.6528 | 20:13:05.26 +36:39:01.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:05.26 +36:39:01.0: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:05.26 +36:39:01.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.2656+36.6528,2461236.6545,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.2656+36.6528 20260715.1545 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.56 20:16:38.22 +37:34:03.7
75.31403 1.24716 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J304.1591+37.5678 | 20:16:36.29 +37:34:10.1 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.508+/-0.042 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:38.22 +37:34:03.7: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:38.22 +37:34:03.7: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J304.1591+37.5678,2461236.6545,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J304.1591+37.5678 20260715.1545 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.41 20:12:27.65 +37:22:47.9
74.69837 1.83284 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.1038+37.3810 | 20:12:26.42 +37:23:04.3 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:12:27.65 +37:22:47.9: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:27.65 +37:22:47.9: 15.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.1038+37.3810,2461236.6545,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.1038+37.3810 20260715.1545 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.35 20:12:52.62 +36:38:04.3
74.12142 1.35328 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.2125+36.6388 | 20:12:51.01 +36:38:19.9 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:12:52.62 +36:38:04.3: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:52.62 +36:38:04.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.2125+36.6388,2461236.6545,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.2125+36.6388 20260715.1545 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.34 20:12:59.75 +37:05:47.3
74.52018 1.58792 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX18" Gaia DR3 2060732116174081664
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.550 G 13.680 G 0.025433200000 F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:12:59.75 +37:05:47.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:59.75 +37:05:47.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060732116174081664,2461236.6545,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060732116174081664 20260715.1545 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.35 19:18:41.17 +34:27:51.5
66.74091 9.84611 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2049567017948960768 | 19:18:39.89 +34:27:39.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:18:41.17 +34:27:51.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:18:41.17 +34:27:51.5: 15.78 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.78 +/- 0.35
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2049567017948960768,2461236.6545,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2049567017948960768 20260715.1545 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.24 19:59:58.44 +33:18:10.8
69.89006 1.78944 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.9874+33.2986 | 19:59:58.44 +33:18:10.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:59:58.44 +33:18:10.8: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:59:58.44 +33:18:10.8: 15.36 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.9874+33.2986,2461236.6545,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.9874+33.2986 20260715.1545 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.22 19:59:22.90 +37:06:31.0
73.07287 3.88538 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.8537+37.1053 | 19:59:22.90 +37:06:31.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: M0: 1949ApJ...109..391N LF 3b 36-137
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:59:22.90 +37:06:31.0: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:59:22.90 +37:06:31.0: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.8537+37.1053,2461236.6545,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.8537+37.1053 20260715.1545 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.23 20:15:56.95 +37:27:31.4
75.14745 1.29955 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX20" V2240 Cyg
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.030 w 12.290 w 2452500.30900 0.404187000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:56.95 +37:27:31.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:56.95 +37:27:31.4: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2240 Cyg,2461236.6545,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2240 Cyg 20260715.1545 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.18 19:52:35.09 +33:17:31.7
69.08021 3.10452 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.1498+33.2925 | 19:52:35.09 +33:17:31.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:52:35.09 +33:17:31.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:52:35.09 +33:17:31.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.1498+33.2925,2461236.6545,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.1498+33.2925 20260715.1545 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.19 20:09:39.94 +37:22:24.1
74.38907 2.29421 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2061526577729045376 | 20:09:42.33 +37:22:27.5 (Gaia DR3) | L (local) | (local) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: A3 1949ApJ...110..478N LF 3b +37 339
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:09:39.94 +37:22:24.1: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:09:39.94 +37:22:24.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2061526577729045376,2461236.6545,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2061526577729045376 20260715.1545 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.91 20:13:55.50 +37:22:38.2
74.85654 1.58867 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.4820+37.3814 | 20:13:55.50 +37:22:38.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:55.50 +37:22:38.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:55.50 +37:22:38.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.4820+37.3814,2461236.6545,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.4820+37.3814 20260715.1545 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.49 20:10:34.45 +36:34:28.9
73.81784 1.70694 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J302.6430+36.5727 | 20:10:33.12 +36:34:35.9 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: B8 1953ApJ...118...77A LF 3a +36 34
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:10:34.45 +36:34:28.9: 14.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:10:34.45 +36:34:28.9: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J302.6430+36.5727,2461236.6545,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J302.6430+36.5727 20260715.1545 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.45 20:11:35.07 +36:38:02.9
73.97858 1.56971 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ASASSN-V J201133.03+363830.3 | 20:11:33.03 +36:38:30.3 (Gaia DR3) | RRC (local) | 0.285518000000 (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:35.07 +36:38:02.9: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:35.07 +36:38:02.9: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J201133.03+363830.3,2461236.6545,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J201133.03+363830.3 20260715.1545 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.38 20:13:43.16 +37:12:43.8
74.69627 1.53151 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.4382+37.2143 | 20:13:45.17 +37:12:51.6 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:43.16 +37:12:43.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:43.16 +37:12:43.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.4382+37.2143,2461236.6545,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.4382+37.2143 20260715.1545 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.33 20:15:49.29 +36:51:21.3
74.63259 0.98483 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.9567+36.8573 | 20:15:48.76 +36:51:53.9 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:49.29 +36:51:21.3: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:49.29 +36:51:21.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.9567+36.8573,2461236.6545,12.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.9567+36.8573 20260715.1545 12.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.02 20:13:55.32 +38:14:29.2
75.57677 2.06678 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.4923+38.2441 | 20:13:58.16 +38:14:13.3 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: A0V 1928MeUpp..37....1S BD+37 3834
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:55.32 +38:14:29.2: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:55.32 +38:14:29.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.4923+38.2441,2461236.6545,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.4923+38.2441 20260715.1545 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.44 19:03:44.23 +36:55:04.0
67.69690 13.63454 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J285.9098+36.9095 | 19:03:41.43 +36:55:01.0 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:03:44.23 +36:55:04.0: 15.72 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:03:44.23 +36:55:04.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.72 +/- 0.35
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J285.9098+36.9095,2461236.6545,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J285.9098+36.9095 20260715.1545 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.60 20:10:58.42 +37:21:40.5
74.52067 2.06972 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX22" Gaia DR3 2060778673621523712
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.300 G 16.970 G 0.731890000000 K
ATTENTION: measured mag 12.60 is 3.7 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 16.30 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:10:58.42 +37:21:40.5: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:10:58.42 +37:21:40.5: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060778673621523712,2461236.6545,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060778673621523712 20260715.1545 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.66 20:11:11.04 +38:14:42.0
75.28409 2.51789 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2061685598909885440 | 20:11:12.91 +38:14:24.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:11.04 +38:14:42.0: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:11.04 +38:14:42.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2061685598909885440,2461236.6545,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2061685598909885440 20260715.1545 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.01 19:35:02.42 +40:58:08.1
74.11205 9.89753 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX10" Gaia DR3 2077366318333914368
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 G 13.130 G A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:35:02.42 +40:58:08.1: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:35:02.42 +40:58:08.1: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2077366318333914368,2461236.6545,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2077366318333914368 20260715.1545 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.16 19:07:27.68 +37:08:17.4
68.21545 13.04593 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" Gaia DR3 2098818099427604480
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.130 G 13.160 G F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:07:27.68 +37:08:17.4: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:07:27.68 +37:08:17.4: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2098818099427604480,2461236.6545,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2098818099427604480 20260715.1545 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.28 20:11:04.84 +37:31:47.1
74.67348 2.14403 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2060806367572142720 | 20:11:07.23 +37:32:14.0 (Gaia DR3) | ROT (local) | (local) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:04.84 +37:31:47.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:04.84 +37:31:47.1: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060806367572142720,2461236.6545,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060806367572142720 20260715.1545 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.29 20:01:54.92 +39:29:22.8
75.36839 4.70799 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J300.4835+39.4877 | 20:01:54.92 +39:29:22.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:01:54.92 +39:29:22.8: 15.01 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:01:54.92 +39:29:22.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.24
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J300.4835+39.4877,2461236.6545,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J300.4835+39.4877 20260715.1545 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.40 19:58:01.80 +35:23:01.9
71.45558 3.21943 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX11" ZTF J195801.34+352251.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.369 r Y 0.220 r 2458385.58650 84.061238900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:58:01.80 +35:23:01.9: 15.41 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:58:01.80 +35:23:01.9: 15.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J195801.34+352251.9,2461236.6545,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J195801.34+352251.9 20260715.1545 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.33 20:14:32.58 +36:46:01.1
74.41641 1.14815 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX16" Gaia DR3 2060523312039375616
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.560 G 13.830 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:32.58 +36:46:01.1: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:32.58 +36:46:01.1: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060523312039375616,2461236.6545,13.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060523312039375616 20260715.1545 13.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.54 19:11:05.02 +36:43:15.8
68.13548 12.21411 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:11:05.02 +36:43:15.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:11:05.02 +36:43:15.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:11:05.02 +36:43:15.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.56 20:09:37.51 +36:31:15.9
73.66895 1.83754 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:09:37.51 +36:31:15.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:09:37.51 +36:31:15.9: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:09:37.51 +36:31:15.9: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.49 19:58:42.24 +33:43:27.1
70.11024 2.23560 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" ASASSN-V J195842.52+334335.0
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.090 g Y 0.120 g 2459367.95900 0.570062000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:58:42.24 +33:43:27.1: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:58:42.24 +33:43:27.1: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195842.52+334335.0,2461236.6545,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195842.52+334335.0 20260715.1545 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.48 19:55:54.35 +36:08:20.0
71.87929 3.97900 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX13" KK Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.285 g Y 5.332 g 2458207.70510 268.000000000000 M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:55:54.35 +36:08:20.0: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:55:54.35 +36:08:20.0: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KK Cyg,2461236.6545,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KK Cyg 20260715.1545 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.57 19:15:06.43 +34:50:25.9
66.75681 10.67257 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX13" Gaia DR3 2050308849001477504
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.070 G 14.110 G A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:15:06.43 +34:50:25.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:15:06.43 +34:50:25.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2050308849001477504,2461236.6545,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2050308849001477504 20260715.1545 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.63 19:05:25.83 +38:04:08.0
68.92040 13.79282 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J286.3525+38.0671 | 19:05:25.83 +38:04:08.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:05:25.83 +38:04:08.0: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:05:25.83 +38:04:08.0: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J286.3525+38.0671,2461236.6545,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J286.3525+38.0671 20260715.1545 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.54 20:13:29.84 +37:17:08.9
74.73328 1.60901 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX11" Gaia DR3 2060741805620327808
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.350 G 13.410 G B
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:29.84 +37:17:08.9: 15.68 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:29.84 +37:17:08.9: 15.72 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.70 +/- 0.24
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060741805620327808,2461236.6545,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060741805620327808 20260715.1545 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.63 19:10:59.86 +37:18:37.8
68.67583 12.47700 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J287.7578+37.3097 | 19:10:59.86 +37:18:37.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:10:59.86 +37:18:37.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:10:59.86 +37:18:37.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J287.7578+37.3097,2461236.6545,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J287.7578+37.3097 20260715.1545 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.70 19:16:13.60 +37:38:55.7
69.43856 11.68055 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J289.0410+37.6477 | 19:16:13.60 +37:38:55.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:16:13.60 +37:38:55.7: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:16:13.60 +37:38:55.7: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J289.0410+37.6477,2461236.6545,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J289.0410+37.6477 20260715.1545 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.63 20:01:38.68 +40:00:24.3
75.78288 5.02345 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J300.4150+40.0188 | 20:01:38.68 +40:00:24.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.323+/-0.071 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:01:38.68 +40:00:24.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:01:38.68 +40:00:24.3: 15.23 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J300.4150+40.0188,2461236.6545,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J300.4150+40.0188 20260715.1545 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.69 19:05:16.76 +35:50:19.1
66.81482 12.91076 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J286.3118+35.8299 | 19:05:16.76 +35:50:19.1 (user input) | CBH (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:05:16.76 +35:50:19.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:05:16.76 +35:50:19.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J286.3118+35.8299,2461236.6545,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J286.3118+35.8299 20260715.1545 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.62 19:57:26.30 +39:13:22.8
74.68790 5.30842 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.3668+39.2152 | 19:57:26.30 +39:13:22.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.719+/-0.045 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:57:26.30 +39:13:22.8: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:57:26.30 +39:13:22.8: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.3668+39.2152,2461236.6545,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.3668+39.2152 20260715.1545 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.59 20:16:07.01 +37:21:47.6
75.08670 1.21868 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J304.0361+37.3629 | 20:16:10.00 +37:21:50.1 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:07.01 +37:21:47.6: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:07.01 +37:21:47.6: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J304.0361+37.3629,2461236.6545,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J304.0361+37.3629 20260715.1545 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.66 19:44:39.82 +34:49:27.3
69.58267 5.29254 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX10" IP Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.000 pg < 18.000 pg 2432810.00000 406.000000000000 M10
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:44:39.82 +34:49:27.3: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:44:39.82 +34:49:27.3: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
IP Cyg,2461236.6545,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
IP Cyg 20260715.1545 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.85 19:07:00.58 +37:29:14.5
68.50457 13.27119 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J286.7339+37.4891 | 19:06:58.37 +37:29:08.3 (Gaia DR3) | NSINE (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:07:00.58 +37:29:14.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:07:00.58 +37:29:14.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J286.7339+37.4891,2461236.6545,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J286.7339+37.4891 20260715.1545 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.74 19:49:52.08 +34:23:46.2
69.74647 4.15093 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.0" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ASASSN-V J194955.14+342400.4 | 19:49:55.14 +34:24:00.3 (Gaia DR3) | SR (local) | 304.706227700000 (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE SpType: N 1988ISKZ...29...16A BC 165
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:49:52.08 +34:23:46.2: 15.33 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:49:52.08 +34:23:46.2: 15.04 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J194955.14+342400.4,2461236.6545,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J194955.14+342400.4 20260715.1545 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.01 20:15:17.02 +36:49:12.7
74.54301 1.05436 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.8318+36.8175 | 20:15:17.02 +36:49:12.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:17.02 +36:49:12.7: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:17.02 +36:49:12.7: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.8318+36.8175,2461236.6545,14.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.8318+36.8175 20260715.1545 14.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.97 19:00:55.54 +39:29:59.3
69.91756 15.16613 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.6" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2100310995696110464 | 19:00:56.97 +39:30:39.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K1III 2016A&A...594A..39F KIC 4446029
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:00:55.54 +39:29:59.3: 15.31 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:00:55.54 +39:29:59.3: 15.01 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2100310995696110464,2461236.6545,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2100310995696110464 20260715.1545 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.95 19:53:13.51 +33:33:11.4
69.37329 3.12313 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.3096+33.5492 | 19:53:13.51 +33:33:11.4 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:53:13.51 +33:33:11.4: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:53:13.51 +33:33:11.4: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.3096+33.5492,2461236.6545,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.3096+33.5492 20260715.1545 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.93 20:11:18.56 +37:08:13.6
74.36945 1.89122 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2060762421464873344 | 20:11:17.29 +37:07:58.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:18.56 +37:08:13.6: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:18.56 +37:08:13.6: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060762421464873344,2461236.6545,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060762421464873344 20260715.1545 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.96 19:12:06.92 +35:05:52.5
66.72441 11.33658 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J288.0240+35.1092 | 19:12:06.92 +35:05:52.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:12:06.92 +35:05:52.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:12:06.92 +35:05:52.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J288.0240+35.1092,2461236.6545,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J288.0240+35.1092 20260715.1545 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.02 20:16:34.81 +37:46:45.1
75.48322 1.37463 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J304.1381+37.7813 | 20:16:34.81 +37:46:45.1 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:34.81 +37:46:45.1: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:34.81 +37:46:45.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J304.1381+37.7813,2461236.6545,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J304.1381+37.7813 20260715.1545 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.06 19:00:14.73 +40:11:04.9
70.52022 15.55136 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J285.0722+40.1871 | 19:00:14.73 +40:11:04.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: F7V 2016A&A...594A..39F KIC 4992554
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:00:14.73 +40:11:04.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:00:14.73 +40:11:04.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J285.0722+40.1871,2461236.6545,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J285.0722+40.1871 20260715.1545 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.98 20:05:09.53 +39:01:00.6
75.29895 3.92502 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ZTF J200509.83+385956.6 | 20:05:08.83 +39:00:15.4 (Gaia DR3) | EA (local) | 1.179301800000 (local) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:05:09.53 +39:01:00.6: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:05:09.53 +39:01:00.6: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J200509.83+385956.6,2461236.6545,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J200509.83+385956.6 20260715.1545 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.94 20:08:43.04 +39:48:11.1
76.33351 3.76656 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J302.1827+39.7877 | 20:08:43.21 +39:47:33.9 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:08:43.04 +39:48:11.1: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:08:43.04 +39:48:11.1: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J302.1827+39.7877,2461236.6545,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J302.1827+39.7877 20260715.1545 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.05 20:13:15.51 +37:00:36.2
74.47695 1.49656 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.3130+37.0059 | 20:13:15.51 +37:00:36.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:15.51 +37:00:36.2: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:15.51 +37:00:36.2: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.3130+37.0059,2461236.6545,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.3130+37.0059 20260715.1545 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 13.99 20:14:34.78 +37:22:41.0
74.92921 1.48079 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX12" Gaia DR3 2060825162337518464
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.720 G 15.770 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:34.78 +37:22:41.0: 15.12 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:34.78 +37:22:41.0: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060825162337518464,2461236.6545,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060825162337518464 20260715.1545 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.03 19:00:46.85 +39:55:54.8
70.31920 15.35936 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J285.1923+39.9354 | 19:00:46.85 +39:55:54.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:00:46.85 +39:55:54.8: 15.59 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:00:46.85 +39:55:54.8: 15.52 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.24
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J285.1923+39.9354,2461236.6545,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J285.1923+39.9354 20260715.1545 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.04 18:59:49.45 +37:39:28.0
68.07619 14.64352 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J284.9569+37.6596 | 18:59:49.45 +37:39:28.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 18:59:49.45 +37:39:28.0: 15.67 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 18:59:49.45 +37:39:28.0: 15.30 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J284.9569+37.6596,2461236.6545,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J284.9569+37.6596 20260715.1545 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.04 20:15:26.15 +36:38:04.2
74.40562 0.92575 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.8611+36.6325 | 20:15:25.58 +36:37:28.9 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: B 1926AnHar.100...17C HD 228587 J-Ks=1.442+/-0.083 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:26.15 +36:38:04.2: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:26.15 +36:38:04.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.8611+36.6325,2461236.6545,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.8611+36.6325 20260715.1545 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.10 20:06:24.78 +40:45:01.5
76.89823 4.64599 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J301.6151+40.7526 | 20:06:27.42 +40:44:44.2 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:06:24.78 +40:45:01.5: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:06:24.78 +40:45:01.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J301.6151+40.7526,2461236.6545,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J301.6151+40.7526 20260715.1545 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.16 19:53:18.56 +39:27:11.0
74.47706 6.11234 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.3386+39.4495 | 19:53:18.56 +39:27:11.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:53:18.56 +39:27:11.0: 15.11 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:53:18.56 +39:27:11.0: 15.04 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.3386+39.4495,2461236.6545,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.3386+39.4495 20260715.1545 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.18 19:51:47.42 +37:16:40.0
72.43967 5.26949 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" V2690 Cyg
Type: UG
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.600 CV 16.400 V 0.492000000000 K7.5/M0.5e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:51:47.42 +37:16:40.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:51:47.42 +37:16:40.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2690 Cyg,2461236.6545,14.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2690 Cyg 20260715.1545 14.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.13 20:14:48.66 +37:17:58.8
74.88946 1.39906 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:14:48.66 +37:17:58.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.959+/- (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:48.66 +37:17:58.8: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:48.66 +37:17:58.8: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.14 20:16:39.32 +37:22:28.5
75.15587 1.13625 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2060638039201117440 | 20:16:36.48 +37:22:16.2 (Gaia DR3) | ACV/roAm/ (local) | (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE SpType: A2 1926AnHar.100...17C HD 228700
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:39.32 +37:22:28.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:39.32 +37:22:28.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060638039201117440,2461236.6545,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060638039201117440 20260715.1545 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.23 19:05:33.42 +34:29:50.9
65.58787 12.30390 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J286.3828+34.5059 | 19:05:33.42 +34:29:50.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.411+/-0.134 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:05:33.42 +34:29:50.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:05:33.42 +34:29:50.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J286.3828+34.5059,2461236.6545,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J286.3828+34.5059 20260715.1545 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.20 19:08:17.22 +36:13:15.4
67.42961 12.51547 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J287.0761+36.2214 | 19:08:14.53 +36:13:13.7 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:08:17.22 +36:13:15.4: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:08:17.22 +36:13:15.4: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J287.0761+36.2214,2461236.6545,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J287.0761+36.2214 20260715.1545 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.28 19:53:19.99 +40:58:08.8
75.79662 6.87359 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" V1453 Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.800 pg 20.000 pg 2433190.00000 415.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:53:19.99 +40:58:08.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:53:19.99 +40:58:08.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1453 Cyg,2461236.6545,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1453 Cyg 20260715.1545 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.19 20:13:05.99 +36:38:16.1
74.14880 1.31778 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.2810+36.6277 | 20:13:05.99 +36:38:16.1 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:05.99 +36:38:16.1: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:05.99 +36:38:16.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.2810+36.6277,2461236.6545,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.2810+36.6277 20260715.1545 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.21 20:11:19.29 +37:16:59.4
74.49309 1.96913 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" ZTF J201119.78+371706.1
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.526 g Y 0.088 g 2458300.95680 0.681845600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:19.29 +37:16:59.4: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:19.29 +37:16:59.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J201119.78+371706.1,2461236.6545,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J201119.78+371706.1 20260715.1545 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.26 20:15:03.99 +37:17:45.7
74.91464 1.35477 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.7575+37.2872 | 20:15:03.99 +37:17:45.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:03.99 +37:17:45.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:03.99 +37:17:45.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.7575+37.2872,2461236.6545,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.7575+37.2872 20260715.1545 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.35 20:14:17.66 +36:52:31.8
74.47919 1.24971 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:14:17.66 +36:52:31.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:17.66 +36:52:31.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:17.66 +36:52:31.8: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.47 19:04:00.62 +40:04:03.6
70.69860 14.84285 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J285.9999+40.0774 | 19:03:57.50 +40:04:29.6 (Gaia DR3) | IRR (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F5V 2016AJ....151...13G LAMOST J190357.50+400429.9
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:04:00.62 +40:04:03.6: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:04:00.62 +40:04:03.6: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J285.9999+40.0774,2461236.6545,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J285.9999+40.0774 20260715.1545 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.36 20:00:42.16 +36:32:50.1
72.73218 3.36634 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:00:42.16 +36:32:50.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:00:42.16 +36:32:50.1: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:00:42.16 +36:32:50.1: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.45 19:00:58.03 +37:58:06.9
68.46333 14.55861 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX17" Gaia DR3 2099888714513015424
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.400 G 15.430 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:00:58.03 +37:58:06.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:00:58.03 +37:58:06.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2099888714513015424,2461236.6545,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2099888714513015424 20260715.1545 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.34 20:15:40.15 +37:23:26.4
75.05994 1.30783 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.9230+37.3910 | 20:15:40.15 +37:23:26.4 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:40.15 +37:23:26.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:40.15 +37:23:26.4: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.9230+37.3910,2461236.6545,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.9230+37.3910 20260715.1545 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.38 20:17:04.24 +37:30:13.1
75.30899 1.14007 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX21" Gaia DR3 2060662778214268032
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.190 G 14.260 G F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:17:04.24 +37:30:13.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:17:04.24 +37:30:13.1: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060662778214268032,2461236.6545,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060662778214268032 20260715.1545 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.29 20:13:35.05 +36:38:11.0
74.20124 1.23597 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.3996+36.6400 | 20:13:35.05 +36:38:11.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:35.05 +36:38:11.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:35.05 +36:38:11.0: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.3996+36.6400,2461236.6545,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.3996+36.6400 20260715.1545 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.31 20:11:11.68 +37:01:58.3
74.26963 1.85332 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J302.7883+37.0377 | 20:11:11.68 +37:01:58.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:11.68 +37:01:58.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:11.68 +37:01:58.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J302.7883+37.0377,2461236.6545,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J302.7883+37.0377 20260715.1545 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.51 19:55:41.51 +33:31:20.2
69.61142 2.66642 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.9220+33.5216 | 19:55:41.51 +33:31:20.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:55:41.51 +33:31:20.2: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:55:41.51 +33:31:20.2: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.9220+33.5216,2461236.6545,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.9220+33.5216 20260715.1545 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.31 20:15:43.52 +37:18:58.1
75.00423 1.25706 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ZTF J201541.11+371811.9 | 20:15:40.33 +37:18:34.1 (Gaia DR3) | BY (local) | 1.708646000000 (local) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:43.52 +37:18:58.1: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:43.52 +37:18:58.1: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J201541.11+371811.9,2461236.6545,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J201541.11+371811.9 20260715.1545 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.32 19:11:21.25 +37:31:18.1
68.90263 12.50112 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2098935094331645952 | 19:11:17.76 +37:30:58.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:11:21.25 +37:31:18.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:11:21.25 +37:31:18.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2098935094331645952,2461236.6545,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2098935094331645952 20260715.1545 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.46 19:58:19.42 +34:34:08.1
70.79031 2.74366 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX12" ASASSN-V J195819.95+343417.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.040 V 15.250 V 2458351.00590 52.298450700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:58:19.42 +34:34:08.1: 15.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:58:19.42 +34:34:08.1: 15.52 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195819.95+343417.9,2461236.6545,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195819.95+343417.9 20260715.1545 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.35 20:16:15.56 +37:43:27.2
75.40219 1.39656 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX14" ZTF J201614.70+374337.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.794 r Y 0.094 r 2458644.96590 28.994819100000
NOTE: the nearer VSX entry Gaia DR3 2060859384621692672 at 14" (record maximum 17.87) is too faint to account for the measured mag 14.35 - the brighter variable above is the more likely counterpart.
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:15.56 +37:43:27.2: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:15.56 +37:43:27.2: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J201614.70+374337.4,2461236.6545,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J201614.70+374337.4 20260715.1545 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.34 20:15:34.02 +36:38:56.9
74.43243 0.91204 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:15:34.02 +36:38:56.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:34.02 +36:38:56.9: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:34.02 +36:38:56.9: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.42 20:02:28.67 +36:51:32.7
73.18542 3.22815 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J300.6232+36.8620 | 20:02:28.67 +36:51:32.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:02:28.67 +36:51:32.7: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:02:28.67 +36:51:32.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J300.6232+36.8620,2461236.6545,14.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J300.6232+36.8620 20260715.1545 14.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.36 20:12:53.04 +37:21:36.4
74.72805 1.75171 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX18" ZTF J201252.48+372153.1
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.226 r Y 0.173 r 2458350.87080 0.357950600000
ATTENTION: measured mag 14.36 is 3.7 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 18.05 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:12:53.04 +37:21:36.4: 15.44 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:53.04 +37:21:36.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J201252.48+372153.1,2461236.6545,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J201252.48+372153.1 20260715.1545 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.44 20:12:37.08 +36:55:35.1
74.33662 1.55726 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.1588+36.9298 | 20:12:37.08 +36:55:35.1 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:12:37.08 +36:55:35.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:37.08 +36:55:35.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.1588+36.9298,2461236.6545,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.1588+36.9298 20260715.1545 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.48 19:56:08.78 +36:53:40.6
72.55370 4.32685 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.0555+36.8861 | 19:56:11.76 +36:53:11.8 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:56:08.78 +36:53:40.6: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:56:08.78 +36:53:40.6: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.0555+36.8861,2461236.6545,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.0555+36.8861 20260715.1545 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.50 19:03:36.73 +33:01:57.8
64.05340 12.06077 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J285.9077+33.0238 | 19:03:36.73 +33:01:57.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:03:36.73 +33:01:57.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:03:36.73 +33:01:57.8: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J285.9077+33.0238,2461236.6545,14.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J285.9077+33.0238 20260715.1545 14.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.44 20:14:13.43 +38:15:45.4
75.62720 2.02910 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:14:13.43 +38:15:45.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:13.43 +38:15:45.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:13.43 +38:15:45.4: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.55 20:13:25.70 +38:09:23.0
75.45223 2.10070 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.3638+38.1619 | 20:13:25.70 +38:09:23.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:25.70 +38:09:23.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:25.70 +38:09:23.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.3638+38.1619,2461236.6545,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.3638+38.1619 20260715.1545 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.60 19:55:08.87 +36:39:42.2
72.25029 4.37863 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.7905+36.6669 | 19:55:08.87 +36:39:42.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.672+/-0.123 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:55:08.87 +36:39:42.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:55:08.87 +36:39:42.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.7905+36.6669,2461236.6545,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.7905+36.6669 20260715.1545 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.51 20:16:26.22 +37:05:57.7
74.90326 1.01857 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" Gaia DR3 2060616220769708672
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.470 G 13.730 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:26.22 +37:05:57.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:26.22 +37:05:57.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060616220769708672,2461236.6545,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060616220769708672 20260715.1545 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.45 19:04:44.15 +36:37:18.4
67.50229 13.33155 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.0" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J286.1815+36.6254 | 19:04:44.15 +36:37:18.4 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:04:44.15 +36:37:18.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:04:44.15 +36:37:18.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J286.1815+36.6254,2461236.6545,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J286.1815+36.6254 20260715.1545 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.57 20:15:11.08 +37:35:33.2
75.17433 1.49997 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.7995+37.6003 | 20:15:11.08 +37:35:33.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:15:11.08 +37:35:33.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:15:11.08 +37:35:33.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.7995+37.6003,2461236.6545,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.7995+37.6003 20260715.1545 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.39 20:16:07.04 +37:28:10.0
75.17496 1.27783 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J304.0307+37.4718 | 20:16:07.04 +37:28:10.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: F0 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:07.04 +37:28:10.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:07.04 +37:28:10.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J304.0307+37.4718,2461236.6545,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J304.0307+37.4718 20260715.1545 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.38 19:55:07.16 +35:49:25.2
71.52628 3.95325 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" HAT 199-25718
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.439 r Y 0.837 r 2458633.69860 589.902666900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:55:07.16 +35:49:25.2: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:55:07.16 +35:49:25.2: 15.28 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.27
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-25718,2461236.6545,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-25718 20260715.1545 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.51 19:56:55.57 +34:55:29.0
70.94525 3.17385 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.2238+34.9323 | 19:56:55.57 +34:55:29.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:56:55.57 +34:55:29.0: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:56:55.57 +34:55:29.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.2238+34.9323,2461236.6545,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.2238+34.9323 20260715.1545 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.65 19:16:13.50 +40:26:34.4
72.02774 12.86643 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:16:13.50 +40:26:34.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:16:13.50 +40:26:34.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:16:13.50 +40:26:34.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.36 20:16:33.91 +37:29:11.5
75.23873 1.21363 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX12" Gaia DR3 2060641990559358464
Type: RRC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.950 G 20.720 G 0.333543000000
ATTENTION: measured mag 14.36 is 5.6 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 19.95 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:33.91 +37:29:11.5: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:33.91 +37:29:11.5: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060641990559358464,2461236.6545,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060641990559358464 20260715.1545 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.48 19:17:33.97 +34:33:27.8
66.72273 10.09439 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:17:33.97 +34:33:27.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:17:33.97 +34:33:27.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:17:33.97 +34:33:27.8: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.44 20:14:47.25 +36:39:17.6
74.35031 1.04521 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:14:47.25 +36:39:17.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:47.25 +36:39:17.6: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:47.25 +36:39:17.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.50 20:14:54.23 +37:17:17.7
74.89021 1.37736 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX21" ZTF J201452.43+371716.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.011 r Y 0.119 r 2458357.69410 40.471297000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:54.23 +37:17:17.7: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:54.23 +37:17:17.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J201452.43+371716.4,2461236.6545,14.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J201452.43+371716.4 20260715.1545 14.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.48 20:13:40.99 +37:23:10.7
74.83751 1.63370 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:13:40.99 +37:23:10.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:40.99 +37:23:10.7: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:40.99 +37:23:10.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.62 20:16:23.38 +36:51:39.3
74.70013 0.89328 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J304.1022+36.8540 | 20:16:23.38 +36:51:39.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:23.38 +36:51:39.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:23.38 +36:51:39.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J304.1022+36.8540,2461236.6545,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J304.1022+36.8540 20260715.1545 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.48 20:13:40.60 +37:24:14.8
74.85165 1.64461 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J303.4276+37.4118 | 20:13:40.60 +37:24:14.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:13:40.60 +37:24:14.8: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:13:40.60 +37:24:14.8: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J303.4276+37.4118,2461236.6545,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J303.4276+37.4118 20260715.1545 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.59 19:55:02.29 +34:12:04.2
70.12368 3.13286 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:55:02.29 +34:12:04.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:55:02.29 +34:12:04.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:55:02.29 +34:12:04.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.75 19:02:15.98 +36:52:21.8
67.53238 13.88548 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J285.5593+36.8680 | 19:02:15.98 +36:52:21.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:02:15.98 +36:52:21.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:02:15.98 +36:52:21.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J285.5593+36.8680,2461236.6545,14.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J285.5593+36.8680 20260715.1545 14.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.46 19:59:54.10 +38:46:33.4
74.55312 4.66743 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" V0336 Cyg
Type: CWA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.100 pg 16.400 pg 2432421.61900 15.787000000000 eaV
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:59:54.10 +38:46:33.4: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:59:54.10 +38:46:33.4: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0336 Cyg,2461236.6545,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0336 Cyg 20260715.1545 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.58 19:17:28.47 +39:07:18.8
70.90614 12.08963 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:17:28.47 +39:07:18.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F5 2016A&A...594A..39F KIC 4049307
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:17:28.47 +39:07:18.8: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:17:28.47 +39:07:18.8: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.72 19:01:38.06 +33:02:13.1
63.88115 12.43960 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:01:38.06 +33:02:13.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:01:38.06 +33:02:13.1: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:01:38.06 +33:02:13.1: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.51 19:59:51.41 +38:25:15.8
74.24473 4.48987 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX10" Gaia19dhj
Type: UG:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.700 G < 22.000 G
ATTENTION: measured mag 14.51 is 4.2 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 18.70 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:59:51.41 +38:25:15.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:59:51.41 +38:25:15.8: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia19dhj,2461236.6545,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia19dhj 20260715.1545 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.62 20:02:20.99 +32:42:05.2
69.64193 1.04886 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX15" Gaia DR3 2034121598324916480
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.320 G 14.420 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:02:20.99 +32:42:05.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:02:20.99 +32:42:05.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2034121598324916480,2461236.6545,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2034121598324916480 20260715.1545 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.73 20:14:41.84 +38:08:21.1
75.57591 1.88330 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:14:41.84 +38:08:21.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:14:41.84 +38:08:21.1: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:14:41.84 +38:08:21.1: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.60 19:15:35.17 +38:48:07.0
70.45018 12.28578 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" NSVS 5533665
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.732 g Y 4.154 g 2451462.30000 256.729863600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:15:35.17 +38:48:07.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:15:35.17 +38:48:07.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 5533665,2461236.6545,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 5533665 20260715.1545 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.56 20:08:13.69 +37:11:13.9
74.07735 2.43356 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" Gaia DR3 2060024339928095232
Type: S
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.980 G 17.830 G F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:08:13.69 +37:11:13.9: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:08:13.69 +37:11:13.9: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2060024339928095232,2461236.6545,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2060024339928095232 20260715.1545 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.72 19:07:11.52 +34:15:25.0
65.50878 11.89686 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:07:11.52 +34:15:25.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:07:11.52 +34:15:25.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:07:11.52 +34:15:25.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.69 20:16:15.37 +36:50:37.6
74.67100 0.90588 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J304.0702+36.8405 | 20:16:15.37 +36:50:37.6 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:16:15.37 +36:50:37.6: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:16:15.37 +36:50:37.6: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J304.0702+36.8405,2461236.6545,14.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J304.0702+36.8405 20260715.1545 14.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.60 19:53:40.66 +33:55:35.7
69.74277 3.23356 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:53:40.66 +33:55:35.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:53:40.66 +33:55:35.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:53:40.66 +33:55:35.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.68 19:14:18.66 +36:12:44.3
67.94645 11.41062 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J288.5673+36.2199 | 19:14:18.66 +36:12:44.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:14:18.66 +36:12:44.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:14:18.66 +36:12:44.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J288.5673+36.2199,2461236.6545,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J288.5673+36.2199 20260715.1545 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.55 19:14:42.48 +36:44:18.7
68.46654 11.56395 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J288.6732+36.7454 | 19:14:42.48 +36:44:18.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:14:42.48 +36:44:18.7: 15.83 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:14:42.48 +36:44:18.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.83 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J288.6732+36.7454,2461236.6545,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J288.6732+36.7454 20260715.1545 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.46 19:55:20.53 +33:06:00.5
69.21181 2.51095 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.8394+33.0928 | 19:55:20.53 +33:06:00.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:55:20.53 +33:06:00.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:55:20.53 +33:06:00.5: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.8394+33.0928,2461236.6545,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.8394+33.0928 20260715.1545 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.59 20:12:20.17 +37:23:49.4
74.69903 1.86292 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:12:20.17 +37:23:49.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F0 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.303+/- (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:12:20.17 +37:23:49.4: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:20.17 +37:23:49.4: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461236.6545,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260715.1545 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.60 19:56:16.45 +33:20:55.0
69.52556 2.47260 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX17" Gaia DR3 2034436505349714688
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.360 G 17.610 G 0.401572000000 K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:56:16.45 +33:20:55.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:56:16.45 +33:20:55.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2034436505349714688,2461236.6545,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2034436505349714688 20260715.1545 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.59 19:47:52.45 +40:47:28.5
75.12359 7.68022 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J296.9617+40.8005 | 19:47:50.81 +40:48:01.9 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:47:52.45 +40:47:28.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:47:52.45 +40:47:28.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J296.9617+40.8005,2461236.6545,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J296.9617+40.8005 20260715.1545 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 14.74 19:17:39.20 +34:27:26.9
66.63932 10.03415 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX11" PQ Lyr
Type: EA/DS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.800 pg 17.000 pg 2435393.79200 9.072459000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:17:39.20 +34:27:26.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:17:39.20 +34:27:26.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
PQ Lyr,2461236.6545,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
PQ Lyr 20260715.1545 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1545 2461236.6545 12.37 19:51:12.37 +39:04:45.5
73.94605 6.27574 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" FZ Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.000 pg 15.200 pg 2435665.00000 196.300000000000 M9:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:51:12.37 +39:04:45.5: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:51:12.37 +39:04:45.5: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FZ Cyg,2461236.6545,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FZ Cyg 20260715.1545 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.92845233 17.05.2026 10:16:48.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
First image: 2461177.92845233 17.05.2026 10:16:48.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
Last image: 2461236.65492456 15.07.2026 03:42:55.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 126
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 80 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44633
Objects passed selection criteria: 44591
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 42146.2
Average stars matched: 40612.2 (96.3603 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 149096 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 14 23:43:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.92845233 17.05.2026 10:16:48.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
First image: 2461177.92845233 17.05.2026 10:16:48.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
Last image: 2461236.65492456 15.07.2026 03:42:55.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1919
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 1082 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 294757
Objects passed selection criteria: 294039
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 276436
Average stars matched: 265864 (96.1758 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2393180 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 15 00:14:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461236.65416126
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits'
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:10.557 +38:00:40.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Image size: 939.4'x622.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.85"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:11.155 +38:00:02.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:10.557 +38:00:40.33
Second-epoch image center 19:38:11.155 +38:00:02.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0106 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Image size: 940.8'x625.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:14.178 +38:00:18.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:10.557 +38:00:40.33
Second-epoch image center 19:38:14.178 +38:00:18.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0133 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:38:11.155 +38:00:02.65
Second-epoch second image center 19:38:14.178 +38:00:18.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01091 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R5gYnPUjio
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZdBTxLsnGX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yyLQI2oH0Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KvEOrXsco4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8243 to 305.2260 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2814 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8243 to 305.2260 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2814 deg
Loaded 29665 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2052 out of 2323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2323 out of 43325 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.783150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.783150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8243 to 305.2260 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2814 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8243 to 305.2260 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2814 deg
Loaded 29665 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2052 out of 2323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2323 out of 43325 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2786 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2786 deg
Loaded 29686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2058 out of 2320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2320 out of 43100 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 121 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
2.3 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
15.1 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.R5gYnPUjio (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5185, bad_region=0, passed=43325
Got 43325 stars (including 38103 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 692 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 639 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.94"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.97"
Excluding outliers - 782 stars left (next iteration limit 699)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits N_match=782 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.650 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=5.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=4.811 sigma_q4_arcsec=5.046 n_q1=174 n_q2=285 n_q3=113 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.623
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZdBTxLsnGX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5150, bad_region=0, passed=43100
Got 43100 stars (including 37909 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 639 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.98"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.91"
Excluding outliers - 794 stars left (next iteration limit 700)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits N_match=794 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.711 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=5.134 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=5.075 n_q1=170 n_q2=287 n_q3=125 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.622
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yyLQI2oH0Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4182, bad_region=0, passed=41617
Got 41617 stars (including 37395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013047 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010438 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 649 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 648 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.99"
Excluding outliers - 730 stars left (next iteration limit 712)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits N_match=730 sigma_overall_arcsec=6.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=5.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.760 sigma_q4_arcsec=4.423 n_q1=184 n_q2=206 n_q3=112 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.919
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KvEOrXsco4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4178, bad_region=0, passed=41534
Got 41534 stars (including 37321 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41534 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 719 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 676 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.87"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.84"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.09"
Excluding outliers - 744 stars left (next iteration limit 739)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits N_match=744 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.041 sigma_q2_arcsec=3.718 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.946 sigma_q4_arcsec=15.849 n_q1=207 n_q2=294 n_q3=148 n_q4=95 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.004
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits sigma_overall=8.650 worst_q_ratio=0.623
ref2=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits sigma_overall=8.711 worst_q_ratio=0.622
new1=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits sigma_overall=6.265 worst_q_ratio=0.919
new2=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits sigma_overall=5.277 worst_q_ratio=3.004
reference average sigma_overall=8.6805 worst_q_ratio=0.6225
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits) flagged: sigma=5.277 (ref avg 8.6805), ratio=3.004 (ref avg 0.6225), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 38172 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2343355.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2343355.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 30.8858 (2.59127e+13), 13 match, 0 conflict, 60 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (294.549,38.0074), pixel scale 5.968 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +---+-+---+--+--+-------------+-----------------+-----+---+-----+-+-----+(best)---------------------+-----
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2343355.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2343355.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (294.560033, 38.004920) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (19:38:14.408, +38:00:17.711).
Field size: 15.7993 x 10.5735 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.52689 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits' -> 'fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 14 23:48 fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 14 23:48 out2343355.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits (fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2343355.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2343355.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.74 degrees of RA,Dec (294.561,38.0057)
log-odds ratio 55.9989 (2.08926e+24), 9 match, 0 conflict, 41 distractors, 27 index.
RA,Dec = (294.557,38.0058), pixel scale 5.97678 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-+----+-----+-+---+---------+-------+-----+(best)-------------------------+------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2343355.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2343355.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (294.562607, 38.004616) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (19:38:15.026, +38:00:16.618).
Field size: 15.8009 x 10.5757 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.53825 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 14 23:48 fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 14 23:48 out2343355.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 100000 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6409, 954.016] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.14221
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 12.8347
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 42.407 (2.61296e+18), 8 match, 0 conflict, 8 distractors, 743 index.
RA,Dec = (294.561,38.0038), pixel scale 5.97755 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+++-+-+--+++(best)--------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------
--> log-odds 42.407
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 77.0279 (2.83645e+33), 18 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 1470 index.
RA,Dec = (294.561,38.0038), pixel scale 5.97755 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++++++-+--+++++----+---++--+-++(best)------++----------------------------------------------------------
--> log-odds 77.0279
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6409, 954.016] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.14221
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 12.8347
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 42.407 (2.61296e+18), 8 match, 0 conflict, 8 distractors, 743 index.
RA,Dec = (294.561,38.0038), pixel scale 5.97755 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+++-+-+--+++(best)--------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------
--> log-odds 42.407
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 77.0279 (2.83645e+33), 18 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 1470 index.
RA,Dec = (294.561,38.0038), pixel scale 5.97755 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++++++-+--+++++----+---++--+-++(best)------++----------------------------------------------------------
--> log-odds 77.0279
Got 4 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (294.555217, 38.003387) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (19:38:13.252, +38:00:12.194).
Field size: 15.7866 x 10.5901 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.51538 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Image size: 942.5'x628.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:13.520 +38:00:15.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 41534 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2445905.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4178, bad_region=0, passed=41534
Got 41534 stars (including 37321 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41534 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.12"
Excluding outliers - 859 stars left (next iteration limit 860)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits N_match=859 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.615 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.843 sigma_q2_arcsec=3.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.537 sigma_q4_arcsec=4.764 n_q1=207 n_q2=298 n_q3=165 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.848
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 improved 2nd new image (fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits): sigma 5.277->5.615, ratio 3.004->0.848; keeping retry result
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: updated local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits with order-2 result
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299_astrometric_residuals.png (782 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301_astrometric_residuals.png (794 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058_astrometric_residuals.png (730 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 2.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059_astrometric_residuals.png (859 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.81 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_224527_TTUQ1b1x1_757556_FYFS88dQ/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:59:18.98 +38:29:21.5: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:42:13.50 +36:30:43.6: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:28:16.78 +38:59:20.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:59:18.98 +38:29:21.5: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:18.98 +38:29:21.5: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0090 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:28:16.78 +38:59:20.8: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:16.78 +38:59:20.8: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0738 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:08:45.21 +36:22:59.3: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:22:59.87 +36:02:32.4: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:42:13.50 +36:30:43.6: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:13.50 +36:30:43.6: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0906 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:22:59.87 +36:02:32.4: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:59.87 +36:02:32.4: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9756 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:08:45.21 +36:22:59.3: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:45.21 +36:22:59.3: ref_mag=10.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9034 delta=-1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:09:24.41 +36:30:33.3: 15.32 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:09:24.41 +36:30:33.3: 14.92 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:09:24.41 +36:30:33.3: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=11.4032 delta=3.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4957 delta=1.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:52:58.43 +37:23:41.6: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:28:12.87 +35:46:38.6: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:25:51.01 +36:10:52.2: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:27:27.44 +38:10:08.8: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:28:12.87 +35:46:38.6: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:12.87 +35:46:38.6: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8963 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:52:58.43 +37:23:41.6: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:58.43 +37:23:41.6: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6706 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:25:51.01 +36:10:52.2: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9437 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:51.01 +36:10:52.2: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9239 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:27:27.44 +38:10:08.8: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:27.44 +38:10:08.8: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9626 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:30:24.52 +40:25:41.1: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:30:24.52 +40:25:41.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:24.52 +40:25:41.1: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0717 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:16:01.97 +36:55:58.8: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=12.0564 delta=2.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:16:01.97 +36:55:58.8: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:01.97 +36:55:58.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1014 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:32:33.09 +40:34:54.0: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:41:15.77 +40:58:22.0: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:32:33.09 +40:34:54.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:33.09 +40:34:54.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1471 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:41:15.77 +40:58:22.0: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:15.77 +40:58:22.0: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1819 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:49:42.39 +40:29:36.7: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:33:46.76 +37:55:56.6: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:50:08.52 +39:43:16.6: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:37:53.84 +38:03:39.9: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:49:42.39 +40:29:36.7: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:42.39 +40:29:36.7: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2164 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:33:46.76 +37:55:56.6: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:46.76 +37:55:56.6: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2004 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:50:08.52 +39:43:16.6: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:08.52 +39:43:16.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2407 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:41:24.75 +40:07:37.5: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:37:53.84 +38:03:39.9: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:53.84 +38:03:39.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2285 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:33:41.58 +37:25:13.2: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:42:56.83 +37:17:53.8: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:41:24.75 +40:07:37.5: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:24.75 +40:07:37.5: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2372 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:33:41.58 +37:25:13.2: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:41.58 +37:25:13.2: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2372 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:42:56.83 +37:17:53.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:56.83 +37:17:53.8: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3139 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:40:29.33 +38:47:22.2: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:33:05.98 +36:46:23.4: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:29:30.94 +39:30:53.9: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:40:29.33 +38:47:22.2: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:29.33 +38:47:22.2: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2490 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:33:05.98 +36:46:23.4: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:05.98 +36:46:23.4: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2720 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:29:30.94 +39:30:53.9: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:30.94 +39:30:53.9: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2628 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:30:28.72 +39:18:39.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:55:44.06 +39:26:22.4: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:55:44.06 +39:26:22.4: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:30:28.72 +39:18:39.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:44.06 +39:26:22.4: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2510 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:36:17.73 +37:38:37.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:28.72 +39:18:39.4: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2696 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:00:23.96 +36:24:02.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:35:18.21 +37:37:10.6: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:36:17.73 +37:38:37.6: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2815 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:17.73 +37:38:37.6: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2743 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:00:23.96 +36:24:02.6: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:35:18.21 +37:37:10.6: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:18.21 +37:37:10.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3036 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:27:36.50 +37:01:44.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2798 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:27:36.50 +37:01:44.9: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:36.50 +37:01:44.9: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3054 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:27:34.49 +35:26:55.1: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:18:21.57 +35:30:25.2: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:38:08.48 +36:02:33.2: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.2926 delta=1.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:27:34.49 +35:26:55.1: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:34.49 +35:26:55.1: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2706 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:18:21.57 +35:30:25.2: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:21.57 +35:30:25.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3277 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:27:41.59 +36:09:15.3: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:28:59.70 +37:45:12.3: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:38:08.48 +36:02:33.2: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:08.48 +36:02:33.2: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2748 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:27:41.59 +36:09:15.3: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:41.59 +36:09:15.3: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2873 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:28:59.70 +37:45:12.3: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:59.70 +37:45:12.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3313 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:31:26.07 +38:25:47.4: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:46:28.75 +36:48:27.6: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:31:44.42 +38:24:38.8: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:31:26.07 +38:25:47.4: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:30:40.97 +38:14:28.8: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:26.07 +38:25:47.4: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3072 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:46:28.75 +36:48:27.6: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:36:13.95 +36:59:40.4: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:28.75 +36:48:27.6: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2910 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:31:44.42 +38:24:38.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:44.42 +38:24:38.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3147 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:30:40.97 +38:14:28.8: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:40.97 +38:14:28.8: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3206 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:36:13.95 +36:59:40.4: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:13.95 +36:59:40.4: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3215 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:45:26.93 +39:18:40.0: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:35:06.84 +36:45:40.8: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:51:48.61 +38:51:10.4: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:45:26.93 +39:18:40.0: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:26.93 +39:18:40.0: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3526 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:35:06.84 +36:45:40.8: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:06.84 +36:45:40.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3083 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:51:48.61 +38:51:10.4: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:48.61 +38:51:10.4: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3153 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53510.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54127.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22039.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53528.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53813.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53908.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54165.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54197.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 38s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 15s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52991_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52992_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52994_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52998_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53000_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (177.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53005_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (160.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53009_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53009_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53010_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53011_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53015_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53016_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53017_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53018_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53018_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53019_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53019_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53021_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53021_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53022_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53023_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53023_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53025_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53025_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53026_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53027_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53027_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:01.93 +33:08:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53030_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53030_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:21.74 +39:11:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:47.90 +34:34:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53033_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53033_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53035_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53036_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53036_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53038_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53038_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53039_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (133.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:29.61 +34:03:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53312_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53312_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:20.79 +39:08:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53375_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53375_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53406_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53406_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53473_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53473_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:05.11 +36:58:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53478_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53478_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:28.70 +39:03:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53510_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53510_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:24.41 +36:30:33.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.38)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53515_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:37.47 +37:01:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 53528_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53598_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53598_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53654_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53654_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53658_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53658_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:53.62 +40:30:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53662_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53662_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53722_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53722_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:37.93 +37:49:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53774_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53774_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53778_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53778_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53806_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53806_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53813_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 53813_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53816_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53816_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53836_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53836_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:15.82 +40:26:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53869_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53869_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53880_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53880_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53885_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53885_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:58.28 +37:17:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53906_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53906_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53908_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 53908_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53913_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53913_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:03.17 +35:27:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53917_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53917_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53926_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53926_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53938_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:53.02 +34:10:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53943_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53943_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53944_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53944_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53949_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53949_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:09.88 +33:25:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53955_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53955_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:43.78 +37:36:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53956_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53956_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53970_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53970_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53980_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53980_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54004_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54004_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (212.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54014_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54014_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54042_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54042_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54050_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54050_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54053_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54053_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:37.72 +39:18:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54058_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54070_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54071_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54071_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54072_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54072_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54076_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54076_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54078_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54078_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (174.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54084_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54084_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54085_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54085_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54086_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54086_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54087_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54087_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54091_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54091_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54108_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54108_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54109_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54109_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54111_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54111_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54114_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54114_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54119_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 54119_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54123_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54123_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54127_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54127_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:23.96 +36:24:02.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.021 2092986285449818368 285.10001426636 +36.40210936835 12.1696 11.5005 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.021#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54131_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54131_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54137_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54137_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 54146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54156_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54156_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54159_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54159_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (198.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54160_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54160_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54165_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 54165_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54166_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54166_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54172_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54172_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54175_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54175_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54176_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54176_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54188_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54188_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54192_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54192_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54195_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54195_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54196_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54196_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54197_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 54197_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54199_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54199_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54206_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54206_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54221_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54221_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 54222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18578_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 18578_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:58.84 +36:43:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19013_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 19013_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:55.85 +36:50:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22039_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 22039_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36610_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 36610_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:03.34 +41:08:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00234_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 00234_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:34.22 +32:55:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39539_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 39539_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08082_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 08082_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336022_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336022_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336040_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336040_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336043_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336043_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336048_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336048_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336057_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336057_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336064_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336064_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336068_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336068_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336070_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336070_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336071_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336071_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336072_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336072_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336101_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336101_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:21.43 +36:51:50.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.001 2099029721053392384 285.83867660118 +36.86524343270 14.7962 14.1245 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.001#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336109_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336109_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336116_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336116_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336118_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336118_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336130_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336130_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336132_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336132_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336133_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336133_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336134_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336134_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336135_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336135_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (170.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336136_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336136_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336142_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336142_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336151_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336151_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336155_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336155_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336158_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336158_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (158.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336162_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336162_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336175_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336175_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (82.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336180_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336180_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336183_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336183_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336187_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336187_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336188_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336188_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336191_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336191_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336194_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336194_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336196_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336196_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336203_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336203_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336205_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336205_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336207_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336207_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336208_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336208_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336209_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336209_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336210_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336210_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (209.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336212_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336212_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336213_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336213_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336217_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336217_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336227_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336227_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (155.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336229_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336229_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336232_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336232_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336233_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336233_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336237_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336237_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336248_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336248_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336253_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336253_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336254_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336254_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336256_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336256_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:19.19 +37:44:52.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336271_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336271_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336273_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336273_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:59.07 +37:53:22.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.23)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336274_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336274_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336276_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336276_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336289_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336289_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (155.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336294_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336294_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (72.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336296_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336296_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336299_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336299_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:04:46.81 +36:55:39.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336305_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336305_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336306_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336306_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (80.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336319_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336319_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336320_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336320_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336324_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336324_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336325_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336325_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336331_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336331_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336335_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336335_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336336_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336336_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336343_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336343_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336344_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336344_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:09.54 +37:34:24.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336347_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336347_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336351_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336351_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336353_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336353_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336360_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336360_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.90 +34:56:31.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336361_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336361_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336363_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336363_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336364_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336364_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336365_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336365_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336366_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336366_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (111.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336374_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336374_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336377_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336377_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336381_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336381_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:01.34 +35:11:40.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336385_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336385_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (178.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336389_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336389_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336392_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336392_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336393_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336393_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336395_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336395_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336396_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336396_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:30.72 +38:01:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336397_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336397_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336400_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336400_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336402_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336402_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336414_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336414_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336422_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336422_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:05.55 +38:24:49.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336423_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336423_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336424_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336424_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336429_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336429_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336432_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336432_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (111.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336434_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336434_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336435_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336435_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336436_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336436_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336445_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336445_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (97.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336447_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336447_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:23.35 +38:10:45.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.04)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336448_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336448_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336449_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336449_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336451_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336451_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:06.95 +36:48:31.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.473 2059995752624263808 301.52712198687 +36.80924830592 14.5584 13.2841 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.473#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336456_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336456_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336460_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336460_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (96.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336461_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336461_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336462_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336462_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336463_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336463_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336464_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336464_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:41.56 +36:56:21.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336466_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336466_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336468_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336468_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336471_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336471_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336473_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336473_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336476_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336476_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336482_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336482_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336483_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336483_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336486_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336486_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336487_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336487_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336488_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336488_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (78.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336491_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336491_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336494_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336494_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336495_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336495_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336498_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336498_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336499_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336499_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336500_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336500_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336502_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336502_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336505_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336505_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336511_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336511_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336513_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336513_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336515_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336515_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336517_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336517_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336519_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336519_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336523_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336523_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336525_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336525_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336527_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336527_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336530_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336530_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336531_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336531_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336532_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336532_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:01.16 +36:51:50.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336533_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336533_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336535_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336535_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336536_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336536_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336540_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336540_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336543_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336543_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (238.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336545_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336545_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336547_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336547_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336549_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336549_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336550_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336550_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336552_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336552_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336555_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336555_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336556_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336556_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336557_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336557_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336558_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336558_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:08.95 +36:55:51.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336559_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336559_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:22.43 +33:39:43.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.05)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336560_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336560_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336562_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336562_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336563_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336563_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336564_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336564_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336569_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336569_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336577_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336577_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (116.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336578_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336578_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336580_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336580_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336581_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336581_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336583_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336583_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336594_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336594_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336598_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336598_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336599_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336599_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336601_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336601_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336604_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336604_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336606_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336606_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336607_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336607_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336611_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336611_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336612_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336612_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336615_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336615_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336619_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336619_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336620_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336620_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336621_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336621_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336624_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336624_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336626_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336626_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336627_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336627_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336628_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336628_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:56.16 +39:29:22.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.009 2062003185971312768 302.48343374957 +39.49004171757 13.5504 12.4662 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.009#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336629_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336629_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336630_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336630_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336631_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336631_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (116.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336632_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336632_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336637_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336637_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336640_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336640_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336641_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336641_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336643_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336643_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:08.54 +37:51:47.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336644_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336644_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:46.82 +36:47:45.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336645_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336645_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336648_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336648_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336649_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336649_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336651_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336651_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336653_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336653_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336654_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336654_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336656_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336656_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336659_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336659_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (155.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336660_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336660_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336662_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336662_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (81.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336663_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336663_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336665_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336665_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:20.88 +37:03:54.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.827 2060723109605584640 303.58710727274 +37.06503668260 14.3684 13.6562 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.827#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336669_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336669_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (63.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336671_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336671_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336674_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336674_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336676_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336676_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336677_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336677_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:40.48 +36:55:35.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.00)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336678_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336678_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:37.07 +36:44:12.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.720 2059763098518718208 299.90434387597 +36.73805786590 13.8961 13.0533 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.720#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336681_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336681_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336684_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336684_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336687_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336687_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336688_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336688_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336689_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336689_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336694_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336694_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:32.46 +37:19:20.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336695_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336695_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336696_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336696_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336698_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336698_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (78.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336700_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336700_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336701_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336701_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336703_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336703_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336707_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336707_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336708_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336708_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336710_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336710_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336715_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336715_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336717_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336717_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336719_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336719_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336728_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336728_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (92.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336730_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336730_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336732_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336732_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336735_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336735_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336738_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336738_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336744_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336744_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336745_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336745_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336746_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336746_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336747_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336747_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (116.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336748_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336748_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336750_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336750_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336751_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336751_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (97.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336752_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336752_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336754_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336754_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336758_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336758_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336761_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336761_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336763_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336763_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336764_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336764_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336767_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336767_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336771_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336771_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336772_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336772_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336774_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336774_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336775_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336775_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336776_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336776_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336777_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336777_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336778_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336778_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336779_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336779_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336782_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336782_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336783_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336783_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336787_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336787_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336789_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336789_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336790_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336790_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336793_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336793_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:12.69 +39:26:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336794_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336794_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336795_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336795_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336797_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336797_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336803_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336803_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336804_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336804_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336807_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336807_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336812_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336812_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336814_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336814_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336815_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336815_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336816_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336816_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:15.93 +37:56:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336818_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336818_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336819_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336819_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336820_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336820_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336821_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336821_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (228.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336822_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336822_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336823_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336823_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336825_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336825_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:42.17 +37:47:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336826_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336826_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336827_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336827_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:39.45 +37:19:47.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.99)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336828_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336828_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336829_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336829_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (111.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336833_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336833_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336835_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336835_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:57.65 +32:54:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336836_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336836_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336838_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336838_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336840_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336840_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336841_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336841_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336842_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336842_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336843_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336843_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336845_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336845_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336847_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336847_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336848_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336848_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:47.97 +36:12:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336850_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336850_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336853_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336853_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336857_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336857_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336859_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336859_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336862_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336862_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336864_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336864_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336866_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336866_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (82.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336867_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336867_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:15.27 +36:53:51.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336869_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336869_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336870_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336870_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336871_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336871_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (166.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336872_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336872_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336873_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336873_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336875_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336875_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336876_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336876_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336877_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336877_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336878_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336878_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336880_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336880_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336882_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336882_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336883_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336883_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336888_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336888_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336889_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336889_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:02.65 +37:36:03.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336895_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336895_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336897_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336897_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336898_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336898_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336899_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336899_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336900_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336900_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336901_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336901_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336902_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336902_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336903_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336903_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336910_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336910_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336912_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336912_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336913_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336913_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:09.63 +37:01:18.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.01)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336916_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336916_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336918_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336918_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336920_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336920_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336922_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336922_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336924_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336924_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336925_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336925_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (92.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336930_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336930_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336931_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336931_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336932_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336932_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (97.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336934_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336934_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (104.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336935_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336935_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336936_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336936_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336941_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336941_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336943_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336943_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336944_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336944_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336947_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336947_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (96.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336948_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336948_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336949_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336949_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336952_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336952_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336953_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336953_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336954_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336954_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336956_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336956_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336957_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336957_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336958_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336958_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336959_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336959_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336961_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336961_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336962_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336962_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336963_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336963_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336965_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336965_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:49.37 +36:32:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336967_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336967_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336969_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336969_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336971_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336971_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (79.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336975_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336975_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336977_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336977_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336979_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336979_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:08.84 +36:57:30.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.821 2059253238681292288 302.53672950831 +36.95930685922 13.6809 13.1505 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.821#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336980_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336980_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (99.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336981_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336981_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336986_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336986_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (104.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336987_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336987_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336988_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336988_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (79.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336989_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336989_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336991_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336991_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336994_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336994_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336995_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336995_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336997_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 336997_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336998_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 336998_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337000_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337000_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337001_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337001_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337002_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337002_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:58.46 +38:27:59.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337005_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337005_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337007_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337007_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:59.07 +36:51:56.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.91)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337008_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337008_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (182.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337011_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337011_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337012_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337012_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337015_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337015_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:19.31 +38:28:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337016_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337016_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (116.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337017_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337017_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:30.69 +37:21:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337018_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337018_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337019_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337019_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337021_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337021_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337022_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337022_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (152.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337023_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337023_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:03.30 +39:23:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337025_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337025_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337026_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337026_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337030_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337030_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:38.81 +34:14:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337033_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337033_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337034_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337034_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337036_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337036_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337038_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337038_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337039_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337039_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337041_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337041_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337042_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337042_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337043_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337043_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337044_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337044_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337045_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337045_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337046_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337046_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337050_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337050_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337051_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337051_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (79.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337052_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337052_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337053_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337053_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (78.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337054_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337054_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:24.08 +34:35:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.231 2044516759183778816 286.60113263621 +34.59465661942 13.4079 12.6388 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.231#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337058_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337058_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337061_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337061_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337064_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337064_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:00.61 +37:13:20.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.56)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337065_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337065_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337066_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337066_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337067_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337067_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337068_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337068_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337069_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337069_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337070_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337070_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337071_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337071_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337072_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337072_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337074_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337074_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337075_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337075_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337076_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337076_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337078_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337078_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337080_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337080_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337081_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337081_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337084_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337084_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337087_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337087_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337089_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337089_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337090_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337090_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337091_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337091_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:55.84 +36:54:12.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337092_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337092_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:43.84 +32:50:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337094_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337094_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337097_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337097_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337099_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337099_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337102_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337102_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337103_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337103_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337106_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337106_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337109_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337109_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:43.70 +35:44:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337110_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337110_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337111_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337111_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337116_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337116_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337123_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337123_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337127_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337127_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:46.04 +37:56:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337129_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337129_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337130_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337130_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337131_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337131_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337133_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337133_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337134_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337134_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337135_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337135_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337139_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337139_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337140_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337140_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337141_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337141_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337143_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337143_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (111.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337144_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337144_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337145_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337145_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:07.30 +36:53:05.3 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337149_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337149_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337150_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337150_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337154_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337154_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337155_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337155_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337156_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337156_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337157_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337157_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337159_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337159_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337160_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337160_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337163_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337163_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337164_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337164_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337166_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337166_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337167_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337167_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:28.90 +35:48:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337168_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337168_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337170_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337170_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337171_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337171_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337172_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337172_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337173_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337173_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337174_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337174_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337175_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337175_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:36.69 +37:05:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337176_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337176_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337179_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337179_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337180_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337180_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337181_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337181_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337182_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337182_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337183_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337183_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337184_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337184_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337187_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337187_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:44.56 +35:56:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337188_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337188_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337189_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337189_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337190_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337190_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (152.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337191_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337191_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337194_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337194_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337195_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337195_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337197_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337197_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337198_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337198_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337199_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337199_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337200_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337200_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337201_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337201_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337202_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337202_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337203_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337203_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337205_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337205_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337207_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337207_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337210_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337210_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337213_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337213_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (191.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337215_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337215_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337217_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337217_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337219_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337219_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337220_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337220_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337221_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337221_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:10.01 +39:32:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337223_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337223_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337224_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337224_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337228_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337228_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337230_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337230_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337231_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337231_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:38.35 +33:28:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337232_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337232_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (150.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337234_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337234_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337235_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337235_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337236_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337236_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337237_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337237_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337239_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337239_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337242_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337242_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337246_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337246_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:39.42 +36:12:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337248_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337248_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:53.92 +36:39:49.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.238 2059233924176942208 301.97514404092 +36.66491884278 12.5655 11.5000 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.238#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337249_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337249_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337250_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337250_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337251_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337251_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337252_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337252_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337253_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337253_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337254_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337254_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (135.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337256_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337256_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:19.20 +33:19:48.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.768 2034436432277293824 299.08086213088 +33.33159785320 12.3459 11.3422 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.768#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337257_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337257_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337259_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337259_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337261_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337261_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337262_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337262_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337264_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337264_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337265_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337265_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337268_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337268_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:59.85 +37:03:08.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.042 2060767506706564608 302.49877376281 +37.05343163710 12.7522 12.2851 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.042#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337269_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337269_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337271_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337271_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337272_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337272_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:08.62 +37:34:58.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.89)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337273_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337273_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337274_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337274_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:25.27 +35:49:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.652 2059510451354053888 299.85593627795 +35.83103589757 12.2077 11.0768 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.652#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337276_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337276_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337277_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337277_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:31.44 +39:44:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337278_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337278_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337279_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337279_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:07.42 +37:50:40.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.518 2060299595768130560 301.28119519978 +37.84567994531 12.8102 12.1854 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.518#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337280_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337280_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (101.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:08.34 +33:25:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337282_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337282_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337283_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337283_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337285_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337285_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337286_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337286_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:52.96 +38:11:21.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.279 2061669960913495296 302.97079997705 +38.19054512954 12.5342 11.9533 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.279#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337287_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337287_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:09.68 +37:33:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337288_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337288_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337289_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337289_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:11.62 +38:04:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.180 2060920678093189120 303.29736868993 +38.08037268106 12.5151 11.8859 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.180#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337290_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337290_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (100.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337292_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337292_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337294_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337294_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337298_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337298_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337299_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337299_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337300_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337300_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337303_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337303_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337304_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337304_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337306_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337306_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337307_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337307_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337309_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337309_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:43.87 +37:20:14.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.41)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337310_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337310_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337311_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337311_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337312_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337312_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337313_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337313_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337315_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337315_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337317_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337317_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:57.83 +37:05:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337318_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337318_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337320_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337320_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337321_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337321_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:29.92 +37:21:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337322_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337322_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337323_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 337323_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337324_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337324_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337325_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337325_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337326_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337326_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (160.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337328_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337328_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (151.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337329_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337329_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337331_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337331_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337332_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337332_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337333_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337333_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337335_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337335_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337336_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337336_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:45.41 +37:07:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337337_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337337_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337338_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337338_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337339_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337339_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337340_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337340_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337342_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337342_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337347_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337347_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337348_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337348_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (152.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337349_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337349_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337463_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337463_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337630_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337630_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:20.95 +39:08:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337773_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337773_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337776_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337776_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:05.09 +36:58:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337866_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337866_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 337940_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 337940_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (164.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338125_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 338125_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338234_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338234_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338245_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338245_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:13.45 +38:13:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338267_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338267_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338276_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338276_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338307_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338307_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:42.73 +37:47:08.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.384 2099293535124353664 288.42866820237 +37.78699468201 12.2577 11.8613 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.384#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338309_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338309_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:01.89 +37:41:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338325_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338325_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:56.76 +36:58:27.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.204 2059265088462971392 302.48645080350 +36.97544482181 12.1505 11.8540 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.204#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338346_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338346_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338363_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338363_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338382_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338382_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338393_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338393_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:16.27 +34:24:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338436_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338436_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:19.35 +39:06:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338478_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338478_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338500_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338500_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (133.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338501_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338501_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338507_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 338507_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338532_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338532_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338543_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338543_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (164.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338561_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338561_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338622_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338622_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (223.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338630_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338630_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338661_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338661_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338693_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338693_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:11.16 +35:48:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338697_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338697_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:15.58 +34:16:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338747_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338747_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (244.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338766_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338766_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338774_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338774_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (133.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338784_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338784_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:25.56 +39:11:11.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.344 2100382665813821952 287.10670246528 +39.18805946541 12.3367 11.5380 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.344#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338809_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338809_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (96.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338814_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338814_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:38.53 +36:50:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338819_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 338819_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338851_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 338851_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338852_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338852_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338942_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338942_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338947_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338947_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338950_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338950_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (78.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 338963_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 338963_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339011_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339011_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339012_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339012_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339017_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339017_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339069_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339069_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (138.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339092_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339092_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (228.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339112_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339112_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (133.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339151_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339151_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339218_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339218_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339252_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339252_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:13.05 +33:58:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (138.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339266_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339266_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339267_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339267_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339299_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339299_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:25.27 +38:01:33.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.251 2060905731607005824 303.60502164866 +38.02716137862 12.3152 11.0974 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.251#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339307_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 339307_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339315_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339315_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339323_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339323_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339376_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339376_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339384_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339384_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:51.58 +40:20:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339392_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339392_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339395_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339395_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339411_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339411_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:11.50 +40:23:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339429_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339429_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339447_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339447_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339502_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339502_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339550_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339550_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339554_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339554_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:17.50 +38:26:29.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339555_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339555_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339594_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 339594_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339598_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339598_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:28.90 +34:35:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339615_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339615_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339637_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339637_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339672_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339672_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339750_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339750_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (81.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339768_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339768_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339775_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 339775_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339808_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339808_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339842_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339842_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339845_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339845_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339848_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339848_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:47.74 +34:23:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339861_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339861_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339868_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 339868_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339874_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339874_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:00.99 +35:01:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339882_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339882_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339898_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339898_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339930_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339930_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339944_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339944_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339959_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339959_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339966_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339966_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339986_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339986_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339996_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339996_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:12.63 +37:22:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 339999_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 339999_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:04.71 +37:33:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340054_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340054_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340058_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340058_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (166.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340070_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340070_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (157.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340095_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340095_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340114_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340114_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (170.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340211_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340211_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340218_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340218_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (150.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340219_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340219_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:08.28 +37:32:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340253_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340253_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (163.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340269_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340269_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340283_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340283_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340287_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340287_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340295_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340295_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340309_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340309_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340310_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340310_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (135.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340317_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340317_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (72.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340343_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340343_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340362_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340362_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340367_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340367_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:29.12 +38:37:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340409_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340409_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340414_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340414_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340419_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340419_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340421_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340421_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340423_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340423_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (138.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340470_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340470_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340480_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340480_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340486_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340486_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (138.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340489_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340489_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340506_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340506_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (248.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340507_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340507_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340533_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340533_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340541_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340541_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340573_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340573_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340580_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340580_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:53.01 +38:56:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340581_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340581_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (63.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340583_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340583_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340587_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340587_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340599_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340599_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340652_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340652_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340678_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340678_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340684_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340684_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340695_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340695_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340701_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340701_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340702_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340702_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340706_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340706_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340726_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340726_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340728_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340728_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340737_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340737_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340738_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340738_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340742_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340742_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340768_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340768_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340784_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340784_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340793_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340793_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340798_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340798_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340820_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340820_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340822_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340822_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340833_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340833_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340834_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340834_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340847_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340847_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 340849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:20.93 +34:53:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340883_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340883_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340889_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340889_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340896_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340896_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340903_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340903_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340934_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340934_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340945_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340945_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340947_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340947_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340952_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340952_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340963_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340963_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340964_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340964_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340973_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340973_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 340981_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 340981_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341010_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341010_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341048_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341048_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341052_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341052_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341065_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341065_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341097_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341097_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341104_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341104_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341121_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341121_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341126_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341126_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (104.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341128_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341128_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341130_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341130_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341137_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341137_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341141_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341141_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (135.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (235.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341149_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341149_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:31.35 +36:52:24.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341161_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341161_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341175_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341175_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341185_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341185_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341205_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341205_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (78.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341211_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341211_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341221_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341221_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (242.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341240_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341240_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341287_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341287_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341296_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341296_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341297_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341297_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341299_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341299_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341302_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341302_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341309_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341309_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341317_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341317_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341326_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341326_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341328_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341328_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (96.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341330_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341330_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341342_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341342_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341349_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341349_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341356_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341356_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:11.15 +34:21:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341365_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341365_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341378_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341378_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (107.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341388_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341388_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341395_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341395_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341407_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341407_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341413_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341413_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341421_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341421_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (91.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341426_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341426_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:34.77 +36:59:57.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.376 2059265883065055360 302.39472469150 +37.00057068159 13.5708 12.9374 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.376#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341427_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341427_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341432_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341432_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341436_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341436_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341461_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341461_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341470_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341470_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341489_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341489_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341496_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341496_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341498_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341498_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341511_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341511_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:43.57 +40:05:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341517_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341517_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341525_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341525_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341535_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341535_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341539_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341539_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341558_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341558_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341569_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341569_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341573_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341573_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341575_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341575_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341577_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341577_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341578_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341578_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341589_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341589_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341604_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341604_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341609_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341609_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341615_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341615_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341622_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341622_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341623_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341623_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341626_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341626_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341627_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341627_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341639_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341639_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341643_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341643_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341646_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341646_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341656_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341656_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:58.93 +35:01:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341670_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341670_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341676_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341676_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341679_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341679_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341689_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341689_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341691_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341691_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341695_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341695_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341714_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341714_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341715_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341715_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341717_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341717_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341718_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341718_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (278.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341731_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341731_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341742_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341742_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341745_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341745_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341752_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341752_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341765_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341765_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341771_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341771_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341785_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341785_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:52.25 +37:45:36.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341788_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341788_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341790_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341790_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341797_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341797_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341802_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341802_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341806_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341806_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341841_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341841_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341846_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341846_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341865_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341865_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341875_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341875_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341876_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341876_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:12.87 +33:28:57.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.540 2034415820779108608 299.80427132963 +33.48396909434 14.2154 13.7332 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.540#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341900_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341900_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:55.96 +39:23:41.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.091 2073998097600705664 300.48461659671 +39.39577936954 12.4829 10.6430 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.091#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341902_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341902_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341904_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341904_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341906_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341906_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341911_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341911_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (200.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341921_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341921_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:40.04 +36:13:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341928_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341928_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341936_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341936_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (82.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341941_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341941_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341945_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 341945_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341948_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341948_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (155.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341951_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341951_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341952_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341952_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341978_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341978_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341986_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341986_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 341995_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 341995_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342001_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342001_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:34.26 +39:41:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342005_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342005_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342015_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342015_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342023_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342023_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342027_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342027_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342030_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342030_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342034_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342034_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342045_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342045_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342069_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342069_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342083_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342083_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342091_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342091_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342102_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342102_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342103_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342103_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342126_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342126_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342130_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342130_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342137_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342137_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:01.42 +35:31:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342140_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342140_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (86.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342141_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342141_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342158_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342158_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342160_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342160_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342167_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342167_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:24.46 +37:32:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342178_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342178_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342195_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342195_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342211_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342211_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (154.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342217_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342217_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342218_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342218_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (189.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342226_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342226_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342228_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342228_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:35.94 +37:02:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342230_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342230_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342236_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342236_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:33.37 +33:29:37.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342239_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342239_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:21.63 +36:50:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342266_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342266_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342267_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342267_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342278_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342278_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342294_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342294_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342295_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342295_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342298_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342298_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342318_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342318_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342322_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342322_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342337_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342337_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342338_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342338_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (158.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342339_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342339_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342342_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342342_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342348_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342348_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342353_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342353_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342357_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342357_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342360_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342360_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342361_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342361_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342366_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342366_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (262.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342379_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342379_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342381_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342381_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (209.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342382_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342382_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342394_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342394_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (138.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342398_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342398_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342400_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342400_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342405_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342405_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342406_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342406_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342412_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342412_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342414_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342414_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342425_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342425_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (111.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342448_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342448_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342459_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342459_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (81.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342464_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342464_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342475_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342475_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342478_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342478_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342479_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342479_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342486_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342486_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (152.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342493_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342493_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342507_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342507_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342524_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342524_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342529_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342529_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342533_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342533_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (92.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342536_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342536_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342537_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342537_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342543_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342543_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342544_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342544_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342545_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342545_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342549_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342549_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342564_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342564_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (78.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342572_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342572_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342588_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342588_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342591_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342591_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:26.56 +36:45:34.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342600_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342600_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342605_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342605_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:38.31 +37:03:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (128.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342621_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342621_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342624_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342624_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342627_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342627_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (111.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342629_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342629_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342630_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342630_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342634_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342634_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342648_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342648_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342659_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342659_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342670_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342670_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342671_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342671_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (152.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342674_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342674_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342683_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342683_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342684_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342684_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342685_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342685_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342689_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342689_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (100.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342692_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342692_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (79.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342699_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342699_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342712_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342712_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:21.20 +33:23:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342714_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342714_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342715_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342715_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:58.44 +34:32:27.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.314 2059279519552449280 299.49386921204 +34.54227767631 14.2439 13.6215 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.314#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342717_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342717_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342720_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342720_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342727_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342727_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (135.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342730_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342730_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342732_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342732_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342734_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342734_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342737_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342737_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342739_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342739_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342748_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342748_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:52.49 +36:55:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342751_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342751_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342753_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342753_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342755_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342755_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (63.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342760_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342760_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342763_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342763_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (80.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342765_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342765_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:08.94 +37:45:03.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.813 2060863061131246208 304.28702548108 +37.75232518047 14.2786 13.1618 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.813#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342779_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342779_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342780_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342780_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342788_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342788_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342789_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342789_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342790_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342790_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (150.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342805_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342805_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342808_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342808_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342814_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342814_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342816_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342816_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342824_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342824_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:54.51 +38:26:01.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.684 2061680616747469312 303.22686720720 +38.43506302332 14.2913 13.6580 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.684#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342830_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342830_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342834_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342834_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (101.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342843_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342843_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342854_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342854_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342871_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342871_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342872_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342872_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342885_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342885_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342887_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342887_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342893_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342893_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342894_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342894_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342909_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342909_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342910_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342910_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342918_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342918_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (157.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342922_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 342922_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342925_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342925_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342926_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342926_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342930_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342930_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342937_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342937_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (154.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342953_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342953_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342954_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342954_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342957_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342957_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342958_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342958_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (176.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342960_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342960_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342963_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342963_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342970_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342970_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342977_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342977_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342979_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342979_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342980_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342980_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342983_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342983_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342987_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342987_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (101.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342995_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342995_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (101.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342996_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342996_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 342999_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 342999_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343000_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343000_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343001_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343001_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343002_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343002_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343005_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343005_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343010_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343010_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343011_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343011_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343012_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343012_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (169.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343023_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343023_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343024_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343024_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343026_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343026_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343038_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343038_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (184.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343039_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343039_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343045_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343045_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343051_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343051_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:45.96 +38:36:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343059_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343059_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343067_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343067_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343076_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343076_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343077_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343077_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343078_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343078_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343082_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343082_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343084_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343084_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (128.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343092_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343092_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343095_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343095_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343100_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343100_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343104_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343104_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:27.58 +36:51:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343107_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343107_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343112_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343112_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343114_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343114_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343121_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343121_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343137_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343137_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343140_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343140_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343142_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343142_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:35.71 +37:35:39.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.040 2060667107541648128 304.14961541395 +37.59524618782 13.9178 13.2477 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.040#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343143_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343143_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343153_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343153_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343157_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343157_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343158_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343158_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343160_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343160_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343168_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343168_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343171_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343171_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343178_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343178_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343181_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343181_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343182_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343182_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343184_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343184_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343190_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343190_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:10.44 +37:43:53.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343202_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343202_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343207_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343207_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343210_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343210_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343212_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343212_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343219_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343219_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343224_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343224_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343236_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343236_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:45.29 +37:28:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343240_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343240_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343241_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343241_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (150.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343242_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343242_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343246_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343246_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343248_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343248_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343255_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343255_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (160.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (168.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343264_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343264_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343267_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343267_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343277_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343277_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343290_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343290_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343295_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343295_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343297_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343297_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343300_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343300_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343303_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343303_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343313_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343313_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:21.54 +36:49:29.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343323_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343323_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343332_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343332_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343333_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343333_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:10.06 +37:00:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343341_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343341_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343343_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343343_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343353_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343353_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343363_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343363_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343366_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343366_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343379_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343379_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343380_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343380_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (138.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343381_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343381_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343386_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343386_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (82.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343388_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343388_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343391_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343391_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343396_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343396_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343401_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343401_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (159.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343403_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343403_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (81.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343408_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343408_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343409_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343409_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343414_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343414_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343424_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343424_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343436_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343436_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343443_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343443_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343447_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343447_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343455_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343455_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343466_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343466_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343467_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343467_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343470_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343470_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343479_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343479_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343480_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343480_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343483_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343483_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343490_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343490_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (104.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343491_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343491_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343498_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343498_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (157.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343499_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343499_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343503_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343503_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343509_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343509_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343510_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343510_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343514_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343514_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343517_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343517_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343518_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343518_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343520_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343520_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343522_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343522_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343529_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343529_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343530_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343530_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (214.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343532_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343532_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343534_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343534_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343535_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343535_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343538_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343538_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343546_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343546_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343551_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343551_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (156.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343552_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343552_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343563_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343563_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (107.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343573_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343573_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343579_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343579_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343584_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343584_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343588_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343588_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343600_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343600_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343607_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343607_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343619_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343619_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343623_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343623_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343625_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343625_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343629_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343629_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343633_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343633_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343636_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343636_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343639_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343639_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343641_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343641_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343643_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343643_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343649_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343649_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343650_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343650_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (63.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343651_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343651_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343658_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343658_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343659_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343659_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (78.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343661_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343661_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (154.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343662_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343662_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343663_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343663_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343664_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343664_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (86.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343668_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343668_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343669_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343669_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343673_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343673_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343684_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343684_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343688_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343688_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (104.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343689_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343689_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343692_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343692_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343695_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343695_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343699_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343699_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (116.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343700_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343700_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (218.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343709_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343709_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343713_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343713_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343718_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343718_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343733_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343733_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343739_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343739_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343743_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343743_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343744_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343744_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343751_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343751_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343755_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343755_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343757_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343757_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343758_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343758_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (86.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343761_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343761_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (187.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343766_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343766_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343770_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343770_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343776_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343776_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343789_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343789_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343790_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343790_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343794_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343794_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343795_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343795_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:49.66 +36:52:40.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343797_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343797_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343800_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343800_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343801_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343801_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343804_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343804_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343812_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343812_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343813_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343813_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343814_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343814_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343820_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343820_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343823_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343823_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (80.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343826_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343826_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (158.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343827_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343827_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343838_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343838_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (167.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343843_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343843_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343847_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343847_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (165.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343852_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343852_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343861_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343861_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343866_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343866_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343867_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343867_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343870_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343870_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343871_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343871_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343874_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343874_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343875_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343875_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343877_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343877_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343879_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343879_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343880_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343880_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343881_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343881_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343888_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343888_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343889_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343889_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343892_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343892_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (151.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343893_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343893_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343894_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343894_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343895_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343895_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (133.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343896_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343896_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343905_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343905_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343906_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343906_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343913_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343913_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343915_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343915_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343920_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343920_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343931_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343931_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343935_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343935_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343943_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343943_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343946_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343946_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343968_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343968_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343975_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343975_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343976_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343976_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343978_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343978_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343984_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343984_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343985_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343985_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (165.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343990_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343990_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343991_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343991_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (92.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343995_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343995_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343996_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 343996_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 343997_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 343997_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344000_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344000_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344012_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344012_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344013_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344013_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344014_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344014_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344018_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344018_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344024_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344024_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344026_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344026_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (158.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344030_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344030_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344038_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344038_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344045_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344045_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344054_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344054_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (111.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344056_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344063_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344063_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344066_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344066_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344067_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344067_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344074_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344074_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344076_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344076_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344077_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344077_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344087_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344087_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344088_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344088_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344092_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344092_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (81.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344100_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344100_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344101_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344101_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344104_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344104_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344106_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344106_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344107_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344107_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344109_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344109_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344110_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344110_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:07.19 +35:39:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344115_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344115_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344120_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344120_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344121_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344121_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344122_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344122_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:19.04 +39:01:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.876 2061953501787810048 302.32996771334 +39.01911144026 14.3643 13.7999 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.876#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344124_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344124_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344129_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344129_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344141_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344141_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344144_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344144_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:16.08 +33:17:05.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.790 2044102243301317760 286.81643524939 +33.28648189117 15.0028 14.2795 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.790#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344146_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344147_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344147_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (128.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344154_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344154_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344158_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344158_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344198_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344198_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (151.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344201_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344201_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344213_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344213_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344229_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344229_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344232_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344232_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:14.44 +33:21:00.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344233_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344233_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344235_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344235_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344237_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344237_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344239_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344239_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (155.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344240_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344240_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344248_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344248_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344257_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344257_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344261_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344261_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344275_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344275_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344276_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344276_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344278_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344278_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344283_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344283_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344286_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344286_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344287_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344287_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344294_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344294_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344300_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344300_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (86.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344316_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344318_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344318_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344319_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344319_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:50.26 +36:40:24.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.003 2060510117899594880 303.71059946202 +36.67457128810 14.7602 14.0232 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.003#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344328_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344328_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344332_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344332_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344344_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344344_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344348_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344348_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344351_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344351_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344358_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344358_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344362_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344362_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344364_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344364_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344367_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344367_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344369_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344369_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344371_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344371_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344374_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344374_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344386_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344386_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344390_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344390_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344392_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344392_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344394_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344394_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344396_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344396_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (155.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344405_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344405_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344415_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344415_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344420_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344420_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344422_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344422_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344424_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344424_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (63.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344426_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344426_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344429_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344429_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344432_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344432_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344435_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344435_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (101.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344448_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344448_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344450_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344450_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344453_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344453_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344456_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344456_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344458_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344458_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344463_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344463_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344465_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344465_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344466_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344466_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344468_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344468_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344473_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344473_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344478_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344478_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (176.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344481_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344481_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (151.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344483_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344483_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344486_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344486_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344487_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344487_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344489_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344489_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344496_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344496_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344498_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344498_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344502_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344502_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344515_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344515_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:25.61 +38:00:00.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.002 2060879794323814144 303.85581379816 +38.00128062162 14.1656 13.5319 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.002#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344516_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344516_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344521_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344521_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (169.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344522_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344522_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344532_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344532_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344536_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344536_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (152.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344544_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344544_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344546_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344546_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344556_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344556_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344557_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344557_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344559_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344559_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344562_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344562_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344567_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344567_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344573_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344573_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (176.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344588_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344588_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344592_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344592_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344594_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344594_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (157.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344595_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344595_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344599_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344599_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344601_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344601_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344610_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344610_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344612_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344612_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344615_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344615_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344622_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344622_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344623_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344623_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344625_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344625_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344631_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344631_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344638_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344649_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344649_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344654_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344654_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344658_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344658_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344662_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344662_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344668_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344668_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344669_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344669_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344671_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344671_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344673_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344673_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344674_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344674_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (107.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344681_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344681_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344685_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344685_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344690_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344690_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344700_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344700_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344703_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344703_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344704_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344704_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344706_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344706_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (128.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344707_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344707_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344713_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344713_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344717_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344717_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344724_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344724_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344725_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344725_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (100.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344730_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344730_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344734_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344734_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (107.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344736_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344736_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344743_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344743_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344752_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344752_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344755_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344755_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344756_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344756_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (63.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344766_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344766_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344772_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344772_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344774_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344774_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344775_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344775_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344779_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344779_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (203.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344781_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344781_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:00.39 +35:05:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344782_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344782_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (107.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344784_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344784_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344785_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344785_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344788_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344788_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (173.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344789_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344789_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344794_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344794_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344809_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344809_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344811_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344811_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344830_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344830_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344831_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344832_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344832_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344834_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344834_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344835_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344835_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344837_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344837_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344841_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344841_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344843_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344843_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344845_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344845_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344846_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344846_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344849_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344858_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344858_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344859_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344859_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344876_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344876_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344877_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344877_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344878_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344878_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (80.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344890_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344890_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344893_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344893_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344899_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344899_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344904_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344904_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344907_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344907_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344908_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344908_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (72.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344913_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344913_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344914_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344914_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344922_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344922_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344927_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344930_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344930_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344937_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344937_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344940_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344940_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344945_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 344945_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344957_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344957_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344958_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344958_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344961_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344961_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344962_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344962_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344966_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344966_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344972_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344972_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344973_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344973_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (169.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344974_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344974_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:14.14 +34:53:02.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344977_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344977_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344979_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344979_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344981_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344981_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344984_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344984_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 344994_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 344994_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345003_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345003_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345008_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345008_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345013_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345013_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345021_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345021_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345022_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345022_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345024_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345024_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345037_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345041_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345041_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345042_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345042_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345044_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345044_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345048_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345048_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345051_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345051_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345058_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345058_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345061_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345061_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345062_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345062_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345080_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345080_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345095_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345095_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345098_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345105_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345106_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345106_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345113_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345113_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345119_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345119_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345122_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345122_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345124_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345124_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345125_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345125_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345127_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345127_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345132_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345132_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345134_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345134_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345147_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345147_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345148_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345151_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345151_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345159_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345159_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345164_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345164_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345165_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345165_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345172_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345172_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345177_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345177_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345178_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345178_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345187_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345187_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345196_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345196_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345198_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345198_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345202_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345202_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345203_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345203_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345206_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345206_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345209_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345209_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345210_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345210_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345211_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345211_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345216_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345218_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345218_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (82.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345219_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345219_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345221_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345221_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345222_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345223_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345223_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345225_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345227_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345227_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (159.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345251_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345251_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (150.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345268_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345268_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345270_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345270_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345279_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345279_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345281_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345285_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345285_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345288_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345288_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345291_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345295_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345295_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345301_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345310_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345310_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345312_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345312_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345319_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345319_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345325_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345325_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345345_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345350_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345350_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345358_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345358_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345366_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345366_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345367_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345367_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345377_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345377_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345389_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345389_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345393_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345393_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345400_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345400_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345410_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345410_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345411_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345411_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345413_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345413_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345438_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345438_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345440_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345440_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (152.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345453_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345453_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 345454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345461_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345461_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345465_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345465_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345490_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345490_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (91.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345518_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345518_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345533_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345533_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345548_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345548_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345562_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345562_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345568_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 345571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 345571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (150.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91226_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 91226_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:41.00 +35:47:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204382_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 204382_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:13.42 +39:26:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 318594_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 318594_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:29.30 +38:35:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259088_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 259088_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (229.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41513_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 41513_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:54.63 +34:13:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193344_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 193344_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:28.85 +39:03:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55607_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 55607_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:07.58 +34:32:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78965_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 78965_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:03.15 +35:27:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145094_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 145094_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:14.68 +37:14:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238746_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 238746_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:53.86 +40:30:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283795_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 283795_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160201_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 160201_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193277_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 193277_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:57.62 +38:54:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316919_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 316919_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:24.41 +36:04:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 288844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 288844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195001_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 195001_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316653_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 316653_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47326_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 47326_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:15.03 +34:23:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194043_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 194043_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:51.94 +38:40:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315261_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 315261_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (138.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06787_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 06787_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 328462_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 328462_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126245_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 126245_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:55.86 +36:50:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101368_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 101368_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:43.07 +36:05:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294718_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 294718_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 326260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:34.89 +36:50:29.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31180_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 31180_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (133.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121224_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 121224_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:58.95 +36:43:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134113_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 134113_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:37.46 +37:01:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09305_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 09305_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37245_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 37245_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:29.77 +34:04:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121205_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 121205_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:02.34 +36:46:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234180_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 234180_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-42-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:28.71 +40:30:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 25s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 506s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6
20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6
19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9
20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4
19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8
19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7
19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5
19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8
19:51:12.37 +39:04:45.5
19:05:59.20 +33:44:12.7
19:55:54.49 +36:01:05.4
19:57:05.69 +33:58:50.7
19:56:46.41 +35:59:37.0
20:14:53.43 +37:42:45.6
19:07:20.35 +38:09:50.3
19:05:37.69 +37:08:40.9
19:51:40.99 +32:53:40.5
19:01:14.44 +36:47:01.0
19:12:53.67 +38:32:53.1
20:14:17.67 +37:15:27.7
19:13:57.61 +35:33:05.2
19:02:59.16 +37:16:18.9
20:15:40.23 +37:20:43.4
19:18:10.21 +39:01:25.7
19:03:47.76 +33:52:42.7
19:54:48.84 +33:27:25.4
19:11:27.65 +37:45:58.2
20:08:36.16 +40:14:37.9
19:51:33.61 +34:35:18.3
20:01:31.21 +39:53:32.7
19:54:49.52 +33:33:00.8
20:14:21.69 +37:00:49.3
20:15:42.52 +37:19:36.7
19:39:02.54 +40:15:13.3
20:09:41.80 +36:59:01.4
20:01:30.32 +36:54:45.9
20:17:05.62 +37:29:30.3
20:14:21.27 +37:01:30.5
20:13:22.09 +37:12:41.4
20:15:44.63 +36:56:23.6
20:15:54.78 +38:09:25.1
20:15:35.10 +37:24:33.3
19:58:36.72 +39:28:59.2
20:12:17.24 +36:35:52.2
19:54:55.49 +33:19:46.7
19:08:18.62 +39:27:54.2
20:00:17.57 +37:05:23.7
19:14:57.91 +34:30:46.2
20:14:34.29 +37:28:03.0
20:14:50.60 +37:47:29.1
19:50:57.50 +33:31:40.9
20:10:34.74 +36:41:29.2
20:00:33.98 +36:24:52.2
20:09:02.71 +38:14:04.0
19:43:57.51 +40:20:36.0
20:10:55.05 +38:25:46.7
20:16:56.65 +37:41:44.9
20:14:51.28 +37:23:08.5
20:05:36.73 +37:33:20.6
19:09:50.36 +40:34:41.0
20:12:26.56 +37:39:35.5
19:05:46.28 +38:32:20.1
19:17:51.83 +35:33:14.6
20:12:45.74 +36:41:24.1
20:13:05.26 +36:39:01.0
20:16:38.22 +37:34:03.7
20:12:27.65 +37:22:47.9
20:12:52.62 +36:38:04.3
20:12:59.75 +37:05:47.3
19:18:41.17 +34:27:51.5
19:59:58.44 +33:18:10.8
19:59:22.90 +37:06:31.0
20:15:56.95 +37:27:31.4
19:52:35.09 +33:17:31.7
20:09:39.94 +37:22:24.1
20:13:55.50 +37:22:38.2
20:10:34.45 +36:34:28.9
20:11:35.07 +36:38:02.9
20:13:43.16 +37:12:43.8
20:15:49.29 +36:51:21.3
20:13:55.32 +38:14:29.2
19:03:44.23 +36:55:04.0
20:10:58.42 +37:21:40.5
20:11:11.04 +38:14:42.0
19:35:02.42 +40:58:08.1
19:07:27.68 +37:08:17.4
20:11:04.84 +37:31:47.1
20:01:54.92 +39:29:22.8
19:58:01.80 +35:23:01.9
20:14:32.58 +36:46:01.1
19:11:05.02 +36:43:15.8
20:09:37.51 +36:31:15.9
19:58:42.24 +33:43:27.1
19:55:54.35 +36:08:20.0
19:15:06.43 +34:50:25.9
19:05:25.83 +38:04:08.0
20:13:29.84 +37:17:08.9
19:10:59.86 +37:18:37.8
19:16:13.60 +37:38:55.7
20:01:38.68 +40:00:24.3
19:05:16.76 +35:50:19.1
19:57:26.30 +39:13:22.8
20:16:07.01 +37:21:47.6
19:44:39.82 +34:49:27.3
19:07:00.58 +37:29:14.5
19:49:52.08 +34:23:46.2
20:15:17.02 +36:49:12.7
19:00:55.54 +39:29:59.3
19:53:13.51 +33:33:11.4
20:11:18.56 +37:08:13.6
19:12:06.92 +35:05:52.5
20:16:34.81 +37:46:45.1
19:00:14.73 +40:11:04.9
20:05:09.53 +39:01:00.6
20:08:43.04 +39:48:11.1
20:13:15.51 +37:00:36.2
20:14:34.78 +37:22:41.0
19:00:46.85 +39:55:54.8
18:59:49.45 +37:39:28.0
20:15:26.15 +36:38:04.2
20:06:24.78 +40:45:01.5
19:53:18.56 +39:27:11.0
19:51:47.42 +37:16:40.0
20:14:48.66 +37:17:58.8
20:16:39.32 +37:22:28.5
19:05:33.42 +34:29:50.9
19:08:17.22 +36:13:15.4
19:53:19.99 +40:58:08.8
20:13:05.99 +36:38:16.1
20:11:19.29 +37:16:59.4
20:15:03.99 +37:17:45.7
20:14:17.66 +36:52:31.8
19:04:00.62 +40:04:03.6
20:00:42.16 +36:32:50.1
19:00:58.03 +37:58:06.9
20:15:40.15 +37:23:26.4
20:17:04.24 +37:30:13.1
20:13:35.05 +36:38:11.0
20:11:11.68 +37:01:58.3
19:55:41.51 +33:31:20.2
20:15:43.52 +37:18:58.1
19:11:21.25 +37:31:18.1
19:58:19.42 +34:34:08.1
20:16:15.56 +37:43:27.2
20:15:34.02 +36:38:56.9
20:02:28.67 +36:51:32.7
20:12:53.04 +37:21:36.4
20:12:37.08 +36:55:35.1
19:56:08.78 +36:53:40.6
19:03:36.73 +33:01:57.8
20:14:13.43 +38:15:45.4
20:13:25.70 +38:09:23.0
19:55:08.87 +36:39:42.2
20:16:26.22 +37:05:57.7
19:04:44.15 +36:37:18.4
20:15:11.08 +37:35:33.2
20:16:07.04 +37:28:10.0
19:55:07.16 +35:49:25.2
19:56:55.57 +34:55:29.0
19:16:13.50 +40:26:34.4
20:16:33.91 +37:29:11.5
19:17:33.97 +34:33:27.8
20:14:47.25 +36:39:17.6
20:14:54.23 +37:17:17.7
20:13:40.99 +37:23:10.7
20:16:23.38 +36:51:39.3
20:13:40.60 +37:24:14.8
19:55:02.29 +34:12:04.2
19:02:15.98 +36:52:21.8
19:59:54.10 +38:46:33.4
19:17:28.47 +39:07:18.8
19:01:38.06 +33:02:13.1
19:59:51.41 +38:25:15.8
20:02:20.99 +32:42:05.2
20:14:41.84 +38:08:21.1
19:15:35.17 +38:48:07.0
20:08:13.69 +37:11:13.9
19:07:11.52 +34:15:25.0
20:16:15.37 +36:50:37.6
19:53:40.66 +33:55:35.7
19:14:18.66 +36:12:44.3
19:14:42.48 +36:44:18.7
19:55:20.53 +33:06:00.5
20:12:20.17 +37:23:49.4
19:56:16.45 +33:20:55.0
19:47:52.45 +40:47:28.5
19:17:39.20 +34:27:26.9
########### Completed Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6
19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9
20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4
19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8
19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7
19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5
19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8
20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6
19:05:59.20 +33:44:12.7
19:55:54.49 +36:01:05.4
19:57:05.69 +33:58:50.7
19:56:46.41 +35:59:37.0
20:14:53.43 +37:42:45.6
19:07:20.35 +38:09:50.3
19:05:37.69 +37:08:40.9
19:51:40.99 +32:53:40.5
19:01:14.44 +36:47:01.0
19:12:53.67 +38:32:53.1
20:14:17.67 +37:15:27.7
19:13:57.61 +35:33:05.2
19:02:59.16 +37:16:18.9
20:15:40.23 +37:20:43.4
19:18:10.21 +39:01:25.7
19:03:47.76 +33:52:42.7
19:54:48.84 +33:27:25.4
19:11:27.65 +37:45:58.2
20:08:36.16 +40:14:37.9
19:51:33.61 +34:35:18.3
20:01:31.21 +39:53:32.7
19:54:49.52 +33:33:00.8
20:14:21.69 +37:00:49.3
20:15:42.52 +37:19:36.7
19:39:02.54 +40:15:13.3
20:09:41.80 +36:59:01.4
20:01:30.32 +36:54:45.9
20:17:05.62 +37:29:30.3
20:14:21.27 +37:01:30.5
20:13:22.09 +37:12:41.4
20:15:44.63 +36:56:23.6
20:15:54.78 +38:09:25.1
20:15:35.10 +37:24:33.3
19:58:36.72 +39:28:59.2
20:12:17.24 +36:35:52.2
19:54:55.49 +33:19:46.7
19:08:18.62 +39:27:54.2
20:00:17.57 +37:05:23.7
19:14:57.91 +34:30:46.2
20:14:34.29 +37:28:03.0
20:14:50.60 +37:47:29.1
19:50:57.50 +33:31:40.9
20:10:34.74 +36:41:29.2
20:00:33.98 +36:24:52.2
20:09:02.71 +38:14:04.0
19:43:57.51 +40:20:36.0
20:10:55.05 +38:25:46.7
20:16:56.65 +37:41:44.9
20:14:51.28 +37:23:08.5
20:05:36.73 +37:33:20.6
19:09:50.36 +40:34:41.0
20:12:26.56 +37:39:35.5
19:05:46.28 +38:32:20.1
19:17:51.83 +35:33:14.6
20:12:45.74 +36:41:24.1
20:13:05.26 +36:39:01.0
20:16:38.22 +37:34:03.7
20:12:27.65 +37:22:47.9
20:12:52.62 +36:38:04.3
20:12:59.75 +37:05:47.3
19:18:41.17 +34:27:51.5
19:59:58.44 +33:18:10.8
19:59:22.90 +37:06:31.0
20:15:56.95 +37:27:31.4
19:52:35.09 +33:17:31.7
20:09:39.94 +37:22:24.1
20:13:55.50 +37:22:38.2
20:10:34.45 +36:34:28.9
20:11:35.07 +36:38:02.9
20:13:43.16 +37:12:43.8
20:15:49.29 +36:51:21.3
20:13:55.32 +38:14:29.2
19:03:44.23 +36:55:04.0
20:10:58.42 +37:21:40.5
20:11:11.04 +38:14:42.0
19:35:02.42 +40:58:08.1
19:07:27.68 +37:08:17.4
20:11:04.84 +37:31:47.1
20:01:54.92 +39:29:22.8
19:58:01.80 +35:23:01.9
20:14:32.58 +36:46:01.1
19:11:05.02 +36:43:15.8
20:09:37.51 +36:31:15.9
19:58:42.24 +33:43:27.1
19:55:54.35 +36:08:20.0
19:15:06.43 +34:50:25.9
19:05:25.83 +38:04:08.0
20:13:29.84 +37:17:08.9
19:10:59.86 +37:18:37.8
19:16:13.60 +37:38:55.7
20:01:38.68 +40:00:24.3
19:05:16.76 +35:50:19.1
19:57:26.30 +39:13:22.8
20:16:07.01 +37:21:47.6
19:44:39.82 +34:49:27.3
19:07:00.58 +37:29:14.5
19:49:52.08 +34:23:46.2
20:15:17.02 +36:49:12.7
19:00:55.54 +39:29:59.3
19:53:13.51 +33:33:11.4
20:11:18.56 +37:08:13.6
19:12:06.92 +35:05:52.5
20:16:34.81 +37:46:45.1
19:00:14.73 +40:11:04.9
20:05:09.53 +39:01:00.6
20:08:43.04 +39:48:11.1
20:13:15.51 +37:00:36.2
20:14:34.78 +37:22:41.0
19:00:46.85 +39:55:54.8
18:59:49.45 +37:39:28.0
20:15:26.15 +36:38:04.2
20:06:24.78 +40:45:01.5
19:53:18.56 +39:27:11.0
19:51:47.42 +37:16:40.0
20:14:48.66 +37:17:58.8
20:16:39.32 +37:22:28.5
19:05:33.42 +34:29:50.9
19:08:17.22 +36:13:15.4
19:53:19.99 +40:58:08.8
20:13:05.99 +36:38:16.1
20:11:19.29 +37:16:59.4
20:15:03.99 +37:17:45.7
20:14:17.66 +36:52:31.8
19:04:00.62 +40:04:03.6
20:00:42.16 +36:32:50.1
19:00:58.03 +37:58:06.9
20:15:40.15 +37:23:26.4
20:17:04.24 +37:30:13.1
20:13:35.05 +36:38:11.0
20:11:11.68 +37:01:58.3
19:55:41.51 +33:31:20.2
20:15:43.52 +37:18:58.1
19:11:21.25 +37:31:18.1
19:58:19.42 +34:34:08.1
20:16:15.56 +37:43:27.2
20:15:34.02 +36:38:56.9
20:02:28.67 +36:51:32.7
20:12:53.04 +37:21:36.4
20:12:37.08 +36:55:35.1
19:56:08.78 +36:53:40.6
19:03:36.73 +33:01:57.8
20:14:13.43 +38:15:45.4
20:13:25.70 +38:09:23.0
19:55:08.87 +36:39:42.2
20:16:26.22 +37:05:57.7
19:04:44.15 +36:37:18.4
20:15:11.08 +37:35:33.2
20:16:07.04 +37:28:10.0
19:55:07.16 +35:49:25.2
19:56:55.57 +34:55:29.0
19:16:13.50 +40:26:34.4
20:16:33.91 +37:29:11.5
19:17:33.97 +34:33:27.8
20:14:47.25 +36:39:17.6
20:14:54.23 +37:17:17.7
20:13:40.99 +37:23:10.7
20:16:23.38 +36:51:39.3
20:13:40.60 +37:24:14.8
19:55:02.29 +34:12:04.2
19:02:15.98 +36:52:21.8
19:59:54.10 +38:46:33.4
19:17:28.47 +39:07:18.8
19:01:38.06 +33:02:13.1
19:59:51.41 +38:25:15.8
20:02:20.99 +32:42:05.2
20:14:41.84 +38:08:21.1
19:15:35.17 +38:48:07.0
20:08:13.69 +37:11:13.9
19:07:11.52 +34:15:25.0
20:16:15.37 +36:50:37.6
19:53:40.66 +33:55:35.7
19:14:18.66 +36:12:44.3
19:14:42.48 +36:44:18.7
19:55:20.53 +33:06:00.5
20:12:20.17 +37:23:49.4
19:56:16.45 +33:20:55.0
19:47:52.45 +40:47:28.5
19:17:39.20 +34:27:26.9
19:51:12.37 +39:04:45.5
###################################################################################
20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:59.20 +33:44:12.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:54.49 +36:01:05.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:05.69 +33:58:50.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:46.41 +35:59:37.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:53.43 +37:42:45.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:07:20.35 +38:09:50.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:37.69 +37:08:40.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:40.99 +32:53:40.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:01:14.44 +36:47:01.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:12:53.67 +38:32:53.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:17.67 +37:15:27.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:13:57.61 +35:33:05.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:02:59.16 +37:16:18.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:40.23 +37:20:43.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:18:10.21 +39:01:25.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:03:47.76 +33:52:42.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:48.84 +33:27:25.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:11:27.65 +37:45:58.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:08:36.16 +40:14:37.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:33.61 +34:35:18.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:31.21 +39:53:32.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:49.52 +33:33:00.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:21.69 +37:00:49.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:42.52 +37:19:36.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:39:02.54 +40:15:13.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:09:41.80 +36:59:01.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:30.32 +36:54:45.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:17:05.62 +37:29:30.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:21.27 +37:01:30.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:22.09 +37:12:41.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:44.63 +36:56:23.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:54.78 +38:09:25.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:35.10 +37:24:33.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:36.72 +39:28:59.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:17.24 +36:35:52.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:55.49 +33:19:46.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:08:18.62 +39:27:54.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:17.57 +37:05:23.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:14:57.91 +34:30:46.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:34.29 +37:28:03.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:50.60 +37:47:29.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:50:57.50 +33:31:40.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:10:34.74 +36:41:29.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:33.98 +36:24:52.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:09:02.71 +38:14:04.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:43:57.51 +40:20:36.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:10:55.05 +38:25:46.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:56.65 +37:41:44.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:51.28 +37:23:08.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:05:36.73 +37:33:20.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:09:50.36 +40:34:41.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:26.56 +37:39:35.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:46.28 +38:32:20.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:51.83 +35:33:14.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:45.74 +36:41:24.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:05.26 +36:39:01.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:38.22 +37:34:03.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:27.65 +37:22:47.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:52.62 +36:38:04.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:59.75 +37:05:47.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:18:41.17 +34:27:51.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:58.44 +33:18:10.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:22.90 +37:06:31.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:56.95 +37:27:31.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:52:35.09 +33:17:31.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:09:39.94 +37:22:24.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:55.50 +37:22:38.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:10:34.45 +36:34:28.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:35.07 +36:38:02.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:43.16 +37:12:43.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:49.29 +36:51:21.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:55.32 +38:14:29.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:03:44.23 +36:55:04.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:10:58.42 +37:21:40.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:11.04 +38:14:42.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:35:02.42 +40:58:08.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:07:27.68 +37:08:17.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:04.84 +37:31:47.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:54.92 +39:29:22.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:01.80 +35:23:01.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:32.58 +36:46:01.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:11:05.02 +36:43:15.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:09:37.51 +36:31:15.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:42.24 +33:43:27.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:54.35 +36:08:20.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:15:06.43 +34:50:25.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:25.83 +38:04:08.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:29.84 +37:17:08.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:10:59.86 +37:18:37.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:16:13.60 +37:38:55.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:38.68 +40:00:24.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:16.76 +35:50:19.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:26.30 +39:13:22.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:07.01 +37:21:47.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:44:39.82 +34:49:27.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:07:00.58 +37:29:14.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:49:52.08 +34:23:46.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:17.02 +36:49:12.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:00:55.54 +39:29:59.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:13.51 +33:33:11.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:18.56 +37:08:13.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:12:06.92 +35:05:52.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:34.81 +37:46:45.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:00:14.73 +40:11:04.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:05:09.53 +39:01:00.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:08:43.04 +39:48:11.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:15.51 +37:00:36.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:34.78 +37:22:41.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:00:46.85 +39:55:54.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:59:49.45 +37:39:28.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:26.15 +36:38:04.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:06:24.78 +40:45:01.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:18.56 +39:27:11.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:47.42 +37:16:40.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:48.66 +37:17:58.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:39.32 +37:22:28.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:33.42 +34:29:50.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:08:17.22 +36:13:15.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:19.99 +40:58:08.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:05.99 +36:38:16.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:19.29 +37:16:59.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:03.99 +37:17:45.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:17.66 +36:52:31.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:04:00.62 +40:04:03.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:42.16 +36:32:50.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:00:58.03 +37:58:06.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:40.15 +37:23:26.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:17:04.24 +37:30:13.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:35.05 +36:38:11.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:11.68 +37:01:58.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:41.51 +33:31:20.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:43.52 +37:18:58.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:11:21.25 +37:31:18.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:19.42 +34:34:08.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:15.56 +37:43:27.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:34.02 +36:38:56.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:28.67 +36:51:32.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:53.04 +37:21:36.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:37.08 +36:55:35.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:08.78 +36:53:40.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:03:36.73 +33:01:57.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:13.43 +38:15:45.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:25.70 +38:09:23.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:08.87 +36:39:42.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:26.22 +37:05:57.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:04:44.15 +36:37:18.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:11.08 +37:35:33.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:07.04 +37:28:10.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:07.16 +35:49:25.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:55.57 +34:55:29.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:16:13.50 +40:26:34.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:33.91 +37:29:11.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:33.97 +34:33:27.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:47.25 +36:39:17.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:54.23 +37:17:17.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:40.99 +37:23:10.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:23.38 +36:51:39.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:40.60 +37:24:14.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:02.29 +34:12:04.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:02:15.98 +36:52:21.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:54.10 +38:46:33.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:28.47 +39:07:18.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:01:38.06 +33:02:13.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:51.41 +38:25:15.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:20.99 +32:42:05.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:41.84 +38:08:21.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:15:35.17 +38:48:07.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:08:13.69 +37:11:13.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:07:11.52 +34:15:25.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:15.37 +36:50:37.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:40.66 +33:55:35.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:14:18.66 +36:12:44.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:14:42.48 +36:44:18.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:20.53 +33:06:00.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:20.17 +37:23:49.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:16.45 +33:20:55.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:47:52.45 +40:47:28.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:39.20 +34:27:26.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:12.37 +39:04:45.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
18:59:49.45 +37:39:28.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:00:14.73 +40:11:04.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:00:46.85 +39:55:54.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:00:55.54 +39:29:59.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:00:58.03 +37:58:06.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:01:14.44 +36:47:01.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:01:38.06 +33:02:13.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:02:15.98 +36:52:21.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:02:59.16 +37:16:18.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:03:36.73 +33:01:57.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:03:44.23 +36:55:04.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:03:47.76 +33:52:42.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:04:00.62 +40:04:03.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:04:44.15 +36:37:18.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:16.76 +35:50:19.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:25.83 +38:04:08.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:33.42 +34:29:50.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:37.69 +37:08:40.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:46.28 +38:32:20.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:59.20 +33:44:12.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:07:00.58 +37:29:14.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:07:11.52 +34:15:25.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:07:20.35 +38:09:50.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:07:27.68 +37:08:17.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:08:17.22 +36:13:15.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:08:18.62 +39:27:54.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:09:50.36 +40:34:41.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:10:59.86 +37:18:37.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:11:05.02 +36:43:15.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:11:21.25 +37:31:18.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:11:27.65 +37:45:58.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:12:06.92 +35:05:52.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:12:53.67 +38:32:53.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:13:57.61 +35:33:05.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:14:18.66 +36:12:44.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:14:42.48 +36:44:18.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:14:57.91 +34:30:46.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:15:06.43 +34:50:25.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:15:35.17 +38:48:07.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:16:13.50 +40:26:34.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:16:13.60 +37:38:55.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:28.47 +39:07:18.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:33.97 +34:33:27.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:39.20 +34:27:26.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:51.83 +35:33:14.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:18:10.21 +39:01:25.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:18:41.17 +34:27:51.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:35:02.42 +40:58:08.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:39:02.54 +40:15:13.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:43:57.51 +40:20:36.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:44:39.82 +34:49:27.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:47:52.45 +40:47:28.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:49:52.08 +34:23:46.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:50:57.50 +33:31:40.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:12.37 +39:04:45.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:33.61 +34:35:18.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:40.99 +32:53:40.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:47.42 +37:16:40.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:52:35.09 +33:17:31.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:13.51 +33:33:11.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:18.56 +39:27:11.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:19.99 +40:58:08.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:40.66 +33:55:35.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:48.84 +33:27:25.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:49.52 +33:33:00.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:55.49 +33:19:46.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:02.29 +34:12:04.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:07.16 +35:49:25.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:08.87 +36:39:42.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:20.53 +33:06:00.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:41.51 +33:31:20.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:54.35 +36:08:20.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:54.49 +36:01:05.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:08.78 +36:53:40.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:16.45 +33:20:55.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:46.41 +35:59:37.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:55.57 +34:55:29.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:05.69 +33:58:50.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:26.30 +39:13:22.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:01.80 +35:23:01.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:19.42 +34:34:08.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:36.72 +39:28:59.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:42.24 +33:43:27.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:22.90 +37:06:31.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:51.41 +38:25:15.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:54.10 +38:46:33.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:58.44 +33:18:10.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:17.57 +37:05:23.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:33.98 +36:24:52.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:42.16 +36:32:50.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:30.32 +36:54:45.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:31.21 +39:53:32.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:38.68 +40:00:24.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:54.92 +39:29:22.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:20.99 +32:42:05.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:28.67 +36:51:32.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:05:09.53 +39:01:00.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:05:36.73 +37:33:20.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:06:24.78 +40:45:01.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:08:13.69 +37:11:13.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:08:36.16 +40:14:37.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:08:43.04 +39:48:11.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:09:02.71 +38:14:04.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:09:37.51 +36:31:15.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:09:39.94 +37:22:24.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:09:41.80 +36:59:01.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:10:34.45 +36:34:28.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:10:34.74 +36:41:29.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:10:55.05 +38:25:46.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:10:58.42 +37:21:40.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:04.84 +37:31:47.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:11.04 +38:14:42.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:11.68 +37:01:58.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:18.56 +37:08:13.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:19.29 +37:16:59.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:11:35.07 +36:38:02.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:17.24 +36:35:52.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:20.17 +37:23:49.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:26.56 +37:39:35.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:27.65 +37:22:47.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:37.08 +36:55:35.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:45.74 +36:41:24.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:52.62 +36:38:04.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:53.04 +37:21:36.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:12:59.75 +37:05:47.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:05.26 +36:39:01.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:05.99 +36:38:16.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:15.51 +37:00:36.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:22.09 +37:12:41.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:25.70 +38:09:23.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:29.84 +37:17:08.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:35.05 +36:38:11.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:40.60 +37:24:14.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:40.99 +37:23:10.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:43.16 +37:12:43.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:55.32 +38:14:29.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:13:55.50 +37:22:38.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:13.43 +38:15:45.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:17.66 +36:52:31.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:17.67 +37:15:27.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:21.27 +37:01:30.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:21.69 +37:00:49.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:32.58 +36:46:01.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:34.29 +37:28:03.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:34.78 +37:22:41.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:41.84 +38:08:21.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:47.25 +36:39:17.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:48.66 +37:17:58.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:50.60 +37:47:29.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:51.28 +37:23:08.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:53.43 +37:42:45.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:54.23 +37:17:17.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:03.99 +37:17:45.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:11.08 +37:35:33.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:17.02 +36:49:12.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:26.15 +36:38:04.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:34.02 +36:38:56.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:35.10 +37:24:33.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:40.15 +37:23:26.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:40.23 +37:20:43.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:42.52 +37:19:36.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:43.52 +37:18:58.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:44.63 +36:56:23.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:49.29 +36:51:21.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:54.78 +38:09:25.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:15:56.95 +37:27:31.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:07.01 +37:21:47.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:07.04 +37:28:10.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:15.37 +36:50:37.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:15.56 +37:43:27.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:23.38 +36:51:39.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:26.22 +37:05:57.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:33.91 +37:29:11.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:34.81 +37:46:45.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:38.22 +37:34:03.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:39.32 +37:22:28.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:16:56.65 +37:41:44.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:17:04.24 +37:30:13.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:17:05.62 +37:29:30.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
18:59:49.45 +37:39:28.0 -- not a known variable star
19:00:14.73 +40:11:04.9 -- not a known variable star
19:00:46.85 +39:55:54.8 -- not a known variable star
19:00:55.54 +39:29:59.3 -- not a known variable star
19:00:58.03 +37:58:06.9 -- a known variable star
19:01:14.44 +36:47:01.0 -- not a known variable star
19:01:38.06 +33:02:13.1 -- not a known variable star
19:02:15.98 +36:52:21.8 -- not a known variable star
19:02:59.16 +37:16:18.9 -- not a known variable star
19:03:36.73 +33:01:57.8 -- not a known variable star
19:03:44.23 +36:55:04.0 -- not a known variable star
19:03:47.76 +33:52:42.7 -- not a known variable star
19:04:00.62 +40:04:03.6 -- not a known variable star
19:04:44.15 +36:37:18.4 -- not a known variable star
19:05:16.76 +35:50:19.1 -- not a known variable star
19:05:25.83 +38:04:08.0 -- not a known variable star
19:05:33.42 +34:29:50.9 -- not a known variable star
19:05:37.69 +37:08:40.9 -- not a known variable star
19:05:46.28 +38:32:20.1 -- a known variable star
19:05:59.20 +33:44:12.7 -- not a known variable star
19:07:00.58 +37:29:14.5 -- not a known variable star
19:07:11.52 +34:15:25.0 -- not a known variable star
19:07:20.35 +38:09:50.3 -- not a known variable star
19:07:27.68 +37:08:17.4 -- a known variable star
19:08:17.22 +36:13:15.4 -- not a known variable star
19:08:18.62 +39:27:54.2 -- not a known variable star
19:09:50.36 +40:34:41.0 -- not a known variable star
19:10:59.86 +37:18:37.8 -- not a known variable star
19:11:05.02 +36:43:15.8 -- not a known variable star
19:11:21.25 +37:31:18.1 -- not a known variable star
19:11:27.65 +37:45:58.2 -- not a known variable star
19:12:06.92 +35:05:52.5 -- not a known variable star
19:12:51.19 +33:35:15.8 -- a known variable star
19:12:53.67 +38:32:53.1 -- a known variable star
19:13:57.61 +35:33:05.2 -- not a known variable star
19:14:18.66 +36:12:44.3 -- not a known variable star
19:14:42.48 +36:44:18.7 -- not a known variable star
19:14:57.91 +34:30:46.2 -- a known variable star
19:15:06.43 +34:50:25.9 -- a known variable star
19:15:35.17 +38:48:07.0 -- a known variable star
19:15:50.32 +36:32:16.8 -- a known variable star
19:16:13.50 +40:26:34.4 -- not a known variable star
19:16:13.60 +37:38:55.7 -- not a known variable star
19:17:28.47 +39:07:18.8 -- not a known variable star
19:17:33.97 +34:33:27.8 -- not a known variable star
19:17:39.20 +34:27:26.9 -- a known variable star
19:17:51.83 +35:33:14.6 -- not a known variable star
19:18:10.21 +39:01:25.7 -- not a known variable star
19:18:41.17 +34:27:51.5 -- not a known variable star
19:19:34.61 +34:47:35.7 -- not a known variable star
19:20:08.75 +34:42:00.5 -- not a known variable star
19:35:02.42 +40:58:08.1 -- a known variable star
19:39:02.54 +40:15:13.3 -- a known variable star
19:43:57.51 +40:20:36.0 -- a known variable star
19:44:39.82 +34:49:27.3 -- a known variable star
19:47:52.45 +40:47:28.5 -- not a known variable star
19:49:52.08 +34:23:46.2 -- not a known variable star
19:50:57.50 +33:31:40.9 -- not a known variable star
19:51:12.37 +39:04:45.5 -- a known variable star
19:51:33.61 +34:35:18.3 -- not a known variable star
19:51:40.99 +32:53:40.5 -- a known variable star
19:51:47.42 +37:16:40.0 -- a known variable star
19:52:35.09 +33:17:31.7 -- not a known variable star
19:52:47.69 +40:31:54.9 -- a known variable star
19:53:13.51 +33:33:11.4 -- not a known variable star
19:53:18.56 +39:27:11.0 -- not a known variable star
19:53:19.99 +40:58:08.8 -- a known variable star
19:53:40.66 +33:55:35.7 -- not a known variable star
19:54:48.84 +33:27:25.4 -- a known variable star
19:54:49.52 +33:33:00.8 -- not a known variable star
19:54:55.49 +33:19:46.7 -- a known variable star
19:55:02.29 +34:12:04.2 -- not a known variable star
19:55:07.16 +35:49:25.2 -- a known variable star
19:55:08.87 +36:39:42.2 -- not a known variable star
19:55:20.53 +33:06:00.5 -- not a known variable star
19:55:41.51 +33:31:20.2 -- not a known variable star
19:55:54.35 +36:08:20.0 -- a known variable star
19:55:54.49 +36:01:05.4 -- not a known variable star
19:56:08.78 +36:53:40.6 -- not a known variable star
19:56:16.45 +33:20:55.0 -- a known variable star
19:56:46.41 +35:59:37.0 -- a known variable star
19:56:55.57 +34:55:29.0 -- not a known variable star
19:57:05.69 +33:58:50.7 -- not a known variable star
19:57:26.30 +39:13:22.8 -- not a known variable star
19:58:01.80 +35:23:01.9 -- a known variable star
19:58:19.42 +34:34:08.1 -- a known variable star
19:58:36.72 +39:28:59.2 -- not a known variable star
19:58:42.24 +33:43:27.1 -- a known variable star
19:59:22.90 +37:06:31.0 -- not a known variable star
19:59:51.41 +38:25:15.8 -- a known variable star
19:59:54.10 +38:46:33.4 -- a known variable star
19:59:58.44 +33:18:10.8 -- not a known variable star
20:00:17.57 +37:05:23.7 -- not a known variable star
20:00:33.98 +36:24:52.2 -- a known variable star
20:00:42.16 +36:32:50.1 -- not a known variable star
20:00:57.55 +38:54:38.6 -- a known variable star
20:01:30.32 +36:54:45.9 -- a known variable star
20:01:31.21 +39:53:32.7 -- not a known variable star
20:01:38.68 +40:00:24.3 -- not a known variable star
20:01:54.92 +39:29:22.8 -- not a known variable star
20:02:20.99 +32:42:05.2 -- a known variable star
20:02:28.67 +36:51:32.7 -- not a known variable star
20:05:09.53 +39:01:00.6 -- not a known variable star
20:05:36.73 +37:33:20.6 -- not a known variable star
20:06:24.78 +40:45:01.5 -- not a known variable star
20:08:13.69 +37:11:13.9 -- a known variable star
20:08:36.16 +40:14:37.9 -- not a known variable star
20:08:43.04 +39:48:11.1 -- not a known variable star
20:09:02.71 +38:14:04.0 -- not a known variable star
20:09:37.51 +36:31:15.9 -- not a known variable star
20:09:39.94 +37:22:24.1 -- not a known variable star
20:09:41.80 +36:59:01.4 -- a known variable star
20:10:34.45 +36:34:28.9 -- not a known variable star
20:10:34.74 +36:41:29.2 -- a known variable star
20:10:55.05 +38:25:46.7 -- not a known variable star
20:10:58.42 +37:21:40.5 -- a known variable star
20:11:04.84 +37:31:47.1 -- not a known variable star
20:11:11.04 +38:14:42.0 -- not a known variable star
20:11:11.68 +37:01:58.3 -- not a known variable star
20:11:13.28 +38:13:27.4 -- a known variable star
20:11:14.59 +37:14:19.6 -- a known variable star
20:11:18.56 +37:08:13.6 -- not a known variable star
20:11:19.29 +37:16:59.4 -- a known variable star
20:11:35.07 +36:38:02.9 -- not a known variable star
20:12:17.24 +36:35:52.2 -- a known variable star
20:12:20.17 +37:23:49.4 -- not a known variable star
20:12:26.56 +37:39:35.5 -- a known variable star
20:12:27.65 +37:22:47.9 -- not a known variable star
20:12:37.08 +36:55:35.1 -- not a known variable star
20:12:45.74 +36:41:24.1 -- not a known variable star
20:12:52.62 +36:38:04.3 -- not a known variable star
20:12:53.04 +37:21:36.4 -- a known variable star
20:12:59.75 +37:05:47.3 -- a known variable star
20:13:05.26 +36:39:01.0 -- not a known variable star
20:13:05.99 +36:38:16.1 -- not a known variable star
20:13:15.51 +37:00:36.2 -- not a known variable star
20:13:22.09 +37:12:41.4 -- a known variable star
20:13:25.70 +38:09:23.0 -- not a known variable star
20:13:29.84 +37:17:08.9 -- a known variable star
20:13:35.05 +36:38:11.0 -- not a known variable star
20:13:40.60 +37:24:14.8 -- not a known variable star
20:13:40.99 +37:23:10.7 -- not a known variable star
20:13:43.16 +37:12:43.8 -- not a known variable star
20:13:55.32 +38:14:29.2 -- not a known variable star
20:13:55.50 +37:22:38.2 -- not a known variable star
20:14:13.43 +38:15:45.4 -- not a known variable star
20:14:17.66 +36:52:31.8 -- not a known variable star
20:14:17.67 +37:15:27.7 -- not a known variable star
20:14:21.27 +37:01:30.5 -- a known variable star
20:14:21.69 +37:00:49.3 -- not a known variable star
20:14:32.58 +36:46:01.1 -- a known variable star
20:14:34.29 +37:28:03.0 -- not a known variable star
20:14:34.78 +37:22:41.0 -- a known variable star
20:14:41.84 +38:08:21.1 -- not a known variable star
20:14:47.25 +36:39:17.6 -- not a known variable star
20:14:48.66 +37:17:58.8 -- not a known variable star
20:14:50.60 +37:47:29.1 -- not a known variable star
20:14:51.28 +37:23:08.5 -- not a known variable star
20:14:53.43 +37:42:45.6 -- not a known variable star
20:14:54.23 +37:17:17.7 -- a known variable star
20:15:03.99 +37:17:45.7 -- not a known variable star
20:15:11.08 +37:35:33.2 -- not a known variable star
20:15:17.02 +36:49:12.7 -- not a known variable star
20:15:26.15 +36:38:04.2 -- not a known variable star
20:15:34.02 +36:38:56.9 -- not a known variable star
20:15:35.10 +37:24:33.3 -- not a known variable star
20:15:40.15 +37:23:26.4 -- not a known variable star
20:15:40.23 +37:20:43.4 -- not a known variable star
20:15:42.52 +37:19:36.7 -- not a known variable star
20:15:43.52 +37:18:58.1 -- not a known variable star
20:15:44.63 +36:56:23.6 -- a known variable star
20:15:49.29 +36:51:21.3 -- not a known variable star
20:15:54.78 +38:09:25.1 -- a known variable star
20:15:56.95 +37:27:31.4 -- a known variable star
20:16:07.01 +37:21:47.6 -- not a known variable star
20:16:07.04 +37:28:10.0 -- not a known variable star
20:16:15.37 +36:50:37.6 -- not a known variable star
20:16:15.56 +37:43:27.2 -- a known variable star
20:16:23.38 +36:51:39.3 -- not a known variable star
20:16:26.22 +37:05:57.7 -- a known variable star
20:16:33.91 +37:29:11.5 -- a known variable star
20:16:34.81 +37:46:45.1 -- not a known variable star
20:16:38.22 +37:34:03.7 -- not a known variable star
20:16:39.32 +37:22:28.5 -- not a known variable star
20:16:56.65 +37:41:44.9 -- a known variable star
20:17:04.24 +37:30:13.1 -- a known variable star
20:17:05.62 +37:29:30.3 -- not a known variable star
Found 128 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
187 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
ERROR: too many candidates -- 187 (excluding asteroids and hot pixels, 128 new), not updating the exclusion list!
###################################################################################
Not allowed to update the exclusion list IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= NO
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461236.65416126 -observatory V36
07:19:27.23 +17:12:20.5 Mercury (5.2mag)
10:31:30.27 +10:31:59.4 Venus (-4.1mag)
04:38:24.58 +21:58:58.3 Mars (1.3mag)
08:21:02.77 +19:57:30.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:18.36 +03:21:53.8 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:08:07.74 +20:47:27.9 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:58.82 +00:20:07.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:30:28.11 -23:20:07.4 Pluto (14.4mag)
08:19:25.66 +21:10:40.2 Moon (-8.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 14 23:44 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461236.65416126:
08:20:59.52 +19:57:44.7 Io (6.1mag)
08:21:11.22 +19:56:58.3 Europa (6.3mag)
08:20:53.11 +19:58:11.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:20:48.11 +19:58:22.4 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:19:21.34 +19:43:45.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:21:04.37 +19:57:25.1 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:18:42.05 +19:47:09.9 Elara (17.7mag)
08:24:43.56 +19:49:07.0 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:25:43.99 +20:03:18.3 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:28.00 +03:21:28.8 Titan (8.5mag)
00:56:13.39 +03:21:51.1 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:55:43.82 +03:20:11.0 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:56:07.59 +03:22:15.7 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:56:12.68 +03:18:25.6 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 14 23:44 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461236.65416126:
17:53:53.48 -31:54:12.6 JWST
13:33:20.19 +58:16:50.3 Chandra
08:40:25.39 -48:16:59.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 14 23:44 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461236.65416126 -observatory V36
02:43:02.08 +14:59:25.2 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:14:20.58 -34:29:01.0 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:30:28.41 -68:13:19.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:02:27.59 +32:31:46.7 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
02:13:27.29 +16:47:27.8 15.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:56:33.91 +32:15:44.7 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:17:50.97 +26:52:51.4 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:59:43.22 +29:33:55.4 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:12:50.89 +05:05:08.7 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:04:20.37 +21:05:51.7 18.0mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:11:11.32 -11:30:09.9 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:43:18.81 +67:33:46.6 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:21:42.95 -10:34:39.9 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:09:02.96 +65:58:16.9 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:39:03.55 +30:14:40.0 14.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:14:06.28 +15:26:35.8 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:35:07.23 +40:17:30.0 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:42:27.37 +46:42:23.7 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
04:54:08.73 -13:35:17.7 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:38:30.86 +28:16:05.6 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:17:38.01 -13:19:43.0 16.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:01:43.81 +22:13:30.6 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:46:18.37 +03:43:29.7 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:38:49.39 +79:10:02.4 17.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:51:11.93 +45:26:32.9 16.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:28:38.21 +05:22:13.0 17.0mag A/2026 E1
21:26:30.05 -16:51:38.3 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:15:45.05 -02:05:54.3 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:07:03.48 +30:04:13.8 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:18:05.88 +12:28:35.4 17.1mag 63P/Wild
00:50:19.27 -05:03:05.6 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
04:38:59.90 +20:24:29.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:29:57.86 +11:15:18.6 16.3mag 88P/Howell
06:49:44.37 +30:13:29.7 15.7mag 93P/Lovas
04:36:39.07 +31:17:05.9 16.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:20:25.74 +30:09:06.9 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:57:07.22 -00:45:46.5 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos
04:59:25.54 +20:56:29.4 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:45:17.07 +19:39:52.1 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
00:02:44.04 +03:06:38.5 17.9mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
07:30:56.94 +15:57:56.9 16.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:18:45.35 -20:43:03.8 15.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
05:50:22.91 +34:56:01.6 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring
18:50:44.26 +18:12:23.0 14.3mag 169P/NEAT
01:52:23.70 +08:06:50.2 17.7mag 220P/McNaught
16:35:31.68 -08:35:22.5 17.1mag 235P/LINEAR
08:55:22.22 +32:50:53.5 18.0mag 240P/NEAT
20:39:51.59 -50:34:27.0 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
02:12:47.66 +14:20:25.9 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
05:51:49.82 +37:11:58.7 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR
15:06:28.66 +05:37:15.5 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski
08:38:55.65 +19:28:45.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:59:17.32 +38:48:55.8 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.6K Jul 14 23:44 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 14 23:44 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 14 23:44 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:49:23.723 -15:30:28.94 AT 2026ubs 2026-07-07.41 23.1172
22:47:25.707 -13:21:20.99 AT 2026ubr 2026-07-07.42 22.9851
22:48:27.713 -14:51:00.69 AT 2026ubq 2026-07-07.41 23.5158
22:55:15.603 -17:20:52.24 AT 2026ubp 2026-07-07.41 22.73
00:01:17.781 -03:06:59.77 AT 2026ubo 2026-06-30.36 21.0986
23:48:53.692 +00:34:05.28 AT 2026ubn 2026-06-30.37 21.2974
23:55:47.866 +01:29:21.94 AT 2026ubm 2026-06-30.37 22.7418
23:56:07.829 -00:07:55.59 AT 2026ubl 2026-06-30.36 22.5755
22:50:20.382 -04:24:01.18 AT 2026ubk 2026-06-30.33 21.8405
23:52:09.876 +01:40:51.93 AT 2026ubj 2026-06-30.37 22.5344
23:48:54.336 +01:46:33.67 AT 2026ubi 2026-06-30.37 22.1609
22:50:27.464 -01:58:53.77 AT 2026ubh 2026-06-30.33 21.7659
22:58:59.868 -08:03:37.23 AT 2026ubg 2026-06-30.38 21.6329
23:49:24.946 +01:58:51.32 AT 2026ubf 2026-06-29.44 22.2202
23:59:56.195 -03:44:57.39 AT 2026ube 2026-06-28.41 20.5542
00:00:50.637 -03:46:47.18 AT 2026ubd 2026-06-28.41 21.298
23:45:12.710 +02:24:00.98 AT 2026ubc 2026-06-28.41 22.0341
20:22:20.949 -12:12:52.91 AT 2026ubb 2026-06-27.32 22.8472
22:57:14.411 -03:45:30.21 AT 2026uba 2026-06-27.38 22.8688
21:41:33.046 -11:26:41.30 AT 2026uaz 2026-06-27.33 22.6995
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 14 23:44 tns_transients_list.txt
