This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 9.04 19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6
14.77860 -13.55485 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 0 -0 0 9.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.6279,9.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.1279 9.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 9.13 19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5
9.40223 -24.35683 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751536414331233920 | 19:45:38.58 -30:47:05.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F5V 1982MSS...C03....0H HD 186451
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5: 10.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5: 10.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.54 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751536414331233920,2461236.6279,9.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751536414331233920 20260715.1279 9.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 7.67 19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4
9.26145 -24.34557 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751531122931504768 | 19:45:24.34 -30:54:11.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: A1V 1982MSS...C03....0H HD 186417
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4: 9.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.67 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751531122931504768,2461236.6279,7.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751531122931504768 20260715.1279 7.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 10.16 19:44:53.56 -29:45:10.6
10.41478 -23.88322 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.5443 Encrenaz -82 222 237 16.5 -0 -0
ATTENTION: measured mag 10.16 is 6.3 mag brighter than the predicted asteroid brightness 16.5 - the transient may be an unrelated new object!
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:44:53.56 -29:45:10.6: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:44:53.56 -29:45:10.6: 11.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.6279,10.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.1279 10.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 10.61 19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4
9.30673 -23.78707 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751368085975872000 | 19:42:59.22 -30:41:10.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G0 1954AnCap..17.....J CD-30 17308 J-Ks=0.450+/-0.170 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4: 11.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751368085975872000,2461236.6279,10.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751368085975872000 20260715.1279 10.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.26 19:03:53.19 -27:48:00.7
8.93605 -14.79771 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX19" Gaia DR3 6763345199273987456
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.980 G 18.320 G 1.295050000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 0 0 11.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:53.19 -27:48:00.7: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:03:53.19 -27:48:00.7: 14.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6763345199273987456,2461236.6279,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6763345199273987456 20260715.1279 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.55 18:43:37.07 -27:38:54.2
7.19467 -10.64374 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -1 -0 1 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:37.07 -27:38:54.2: 14.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:43:37.07 -27:38:54.2: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.6279,11.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.1279 11.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 10.71 19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8
9.31249 -23.71234 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751379733927185408 | 19:42:39.95 -30:39:25.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F3V 1982MSS...C03....0H HD 185906
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8: 11.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8: 11.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751379733927185408,2461236.6279,10.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751379733927185408 20260715.1279 10.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 10.91 19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8
9.96323 -23.57180 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751824108420064512 | 19:42:55.99 -30:02:49.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8: 11.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751824108420064512,2461236.6279,10.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751824108420064512 20260715.1279 10.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 10.87 19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8
9.27405 -23.84159 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751366986464238592 | 19:43:11.24 -30:43:58.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8: 12.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8: 12.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751366986464238592,2461236.6279,10.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751366986464238592 20260715.1279 10.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 10.85 19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4
9.92081 -24.13412 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX24" ASASSN-V J194520.99-301553.5
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.810 g Y 0.150 g 2458728.47600 16.230000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4: 12.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4: 12.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J194520.99-301553.5,2461236.6279,10.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J194520.99-301553.5 20260715.1279 10.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 10.99 19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9
9.42600 -23.70776 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751381447612628608 | 19:42:48.02 -30:33:25.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9: 11.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751381447612628608,2461236.6279,10.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751381447612628608 20260715.1279 10.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.38 19:12:31.11 -29:46:32.1
7.79133 -17.30138 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -5 -5 7 11.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:31.11 -29:46:32.1: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:31.11 -29:46:32.1: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.6279,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.1279 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.05 19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6
9.18200 -23.32343 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751401414921902464 | 19:40:46.44 -30:38:46.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6: 12.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751401414921902464,2461236.6279,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751401414921902464 20260715.1279 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.15 19:45:24.23 -29:51:56.6
10.33678 -24.02440 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.5443 Encrenaz 317 -184 367 16.5 -0 -0
ATTENTION: measured mag 11.15 is 5.3 mag brighter than the predicted asteroid brightness 16.5 - the transient may be an unrelated new object!
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:24.23 -29:51:56.6: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:24.23 -29:51:56.6: 12.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.6279,11.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.1279 11.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.31 19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5
9.93665 -23.81543 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751772053415437824 | 19:43:57.95 -30:08:55.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5: 12.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751772053415437824,2461236.6279,11.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751772053415437824 20260715.1279 11.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.32 19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1
10.10412 -24.06235 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751783460848786560 | 19:45:16.37 -30:04:56.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1: 12.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1: 12.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751783460848786560,2461236.6279,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751783460848786560 20260715.1279 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.92 19:42:04.14 -21:42:57.0
18.31070 -20.48093 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa -0 1 1 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:04.14 -21:42:57.0: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:04.14 -21:42:57.0: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.6279,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.1279 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.32 19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9
9.58448 -24.25957 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751557201973031552 | 19:45:27.16 -30:35:46.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9: 13.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9: 12.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751557201973031552,2461236.6279,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751557201973031552 20260715.1279 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.42 19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7
9.10141 -23.26804 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751402376994605184 | 19:40:25.04 -30:41:56.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7: 12.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751402376994605184,2461236.6279,11.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751402376994605184 20260715.1279 11.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 12.47 18:56:02.01 -24:32:27.2
11.26422 -11.86593 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 1 1 1 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:02.01 -24:32:27.2: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:02.01 -24:32:27.2: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.6279,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.1279 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.67 19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3
9.74125 -24.38827 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751581975344357248 | 19:46:14.10 -30:30:06.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3: 13.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3: 13.92 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751581975344357248,2461236.6279,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751581975344357248 20260715.1279 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 12.01 19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1
8.73635 -23.23001 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | V7894 Sgr | 19:39:44.97 -31:00:13.9 (Gaia DR3) | (local) | 0.121062000000 (local) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1: 13.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1: 12.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V7894 Sgr,2461236.6279,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V7894 Sgr 20260715.1279 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 12.01 19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6
9.13521 -23.66422 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6751371517648246272 | 19:42:12.76 -30:47:45.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6: 13.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6751371517648246272,2461236.6279,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6751371517648246272 20260715.1279 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 13.17 19:25:51.05 -22:40:14.4
15.86553 -17.37349 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.468 Lina -1 1 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:25:51.05 -22:40:14.4: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:25:51.05 -22:40:14.4: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461236.6279,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260715.1279 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.70 19:41:32.93 -26:40:19.4
13.30279 -22.15975 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V4025 Sgr
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.240 V Y 1.660 V 2452420.00000 218.150087500000
The object was found in astcheck.24721 1991 TJ -401 -323 515 16.5 -0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:41:32.93 -26:40:19.4: 13.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:41:32.93 -26:40:19.4: 12.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V4025 Sgr,2461236.6279,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V4025 Sgr 20260715.1279 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.39 19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2
7.01703 -15.99085 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J190538-2958.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.940 Ic Y 0.696 Ic 2453056.50000 241.400000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2: 12.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J190538-2958.1,2461236.6279,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J190538-2958.1 20260715.1279 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 12.06 19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8
10.80141 -17.73789 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J191916-2716.8
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.450 V 14.000 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8: 13.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J191916-2716.8,2461236.6279,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J191916-2716.8 20260715.1279 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 15.1279 2461236.6279 11.60 19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2
10.08853 -23.48820 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX11" DS Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V < 14.000 V 2452143.00000 217.000000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2: 13.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2: 13.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DS Sgr,2461236.6279,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DS Sgr 20260715.1279 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461236.62827118 15.07.2026 03:04:32.630 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9837
Objects passed selection criteria: 9816
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8415.75
Average stars matched: 8331.5 (98.9989 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119752 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 15 00:59:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461236.62827118 15.07.2026 03:04:32.630 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 256
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 57 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 110139
Objects passed selection criteria: 109929
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 89999
Average stars matched: 88556.8 (98.3975 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2084424 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 15 01:05:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461236.62761441
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.3' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:04.023 -26:00:41.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:04.023 -26:00:41.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0169 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.664 -26:00:22.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.664 -26:00:22.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:04.023 -26:00:41.84
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:01.664 -26:00:22.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01040 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i0lrkg5tEn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fLhrfATPDy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PeLtTsIhuT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OiM0lKH1Tf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.554850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.554850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13383 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7396 out of 7628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7628 out of 9734 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
3.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.i0lrkg5tEn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=0, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=250 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fLhrfATPDy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=677, bad_region=0, passed=9734
Got 9734 stars (including 9047 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.623 n_q1=243 n_q2=199 n_q3=234 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PeLtTsIhuT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=270, bad_region=0, passed=5392
Got 5392 stars (including 5117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5392 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.799 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.909 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.169 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.848 n_q1=262 n_q2=117 n_q3=308 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.462
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OiM0lKH1Tf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=276, bad_region=0, passed=5514
Got 5514 stars (including 5230 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.765 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.805 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.163 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.743 n_q1=262 n_q2=120 n_q3=304 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.519
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.277
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.593 worst_q_ratio=1.188
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.799 worst_q_ratio=1.462
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.765 worst_q_ratio=1.519
reference average sigma_overall=0.584 worst_q_ratio=1.2325
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (926 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.69 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (926 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.66 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5: 10.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:22.75 -30:53:52.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5: 10.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:22.75 -30:53:52.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:22.75 -30:53:52.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5: ref_mag=10.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.1277 delta=1.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20117.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20084_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20084_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20092_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 20092_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20117_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 20117_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:41.19 -30:39:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20160_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20160_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.91 -30:28:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20164_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20164_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.21 -22:42:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20165_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20165_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:50.04 -20:59:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20234_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20234_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:46.14 -22:32:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20237_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20237_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.26 -28:37:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20238_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20238_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:08.17 -30:49:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20019_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20019_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.82 -23:56:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20018_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20018_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.88 -29:04:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.39 -22:34:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20010_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 20010_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.59 -26:20:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.11 -28:51:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 23s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6
19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.3' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:04.023 -26:00:41.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:04.023 -26:00:41.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0169 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.664 -26:00:22.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.664 -26:00:22.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:04.023 -26:00:41.84
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:01.664 -26:00:22.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01040 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wDBUCYDnD1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wKbbA7Ib1K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2B550kE2QC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cJyAoVzLGH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.361800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.361800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 111498 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13436 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9982 out of 11636 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11636 out of 111498 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 226 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wDBUCYDnD1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=0, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wKbbA7Ib1K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=8357, bad_region=1, passed=111486
Got 111486 stars (including 102963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111486 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.750 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.585 n_q1=260 n_q2=213 n_q3=199 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2B550kE2QC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2279, bad_region=1, passed=51634
Got 51634 stars (including 49264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51634 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.792 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.859 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.771 n_q1=258 n_q2=116 n_q3=302 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.633
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cJyAoVzLGH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2442, bad_region=1, passed=54418
Got 54418 stars (including 51884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.757 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.254 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.717 n_q1=261 n_q2=116 n_q3=308 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.604
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-03-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220932_TTUQ1b1x1_2937555_UOS0VJDv/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:44.52 -21:13:52.3: 13.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:39:02.73 -24:35:38.4: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:37.85 -21:00:30.4: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:56.05 -20:47:41.4: 13.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:24.86 -23:14:51.0: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:41:44.52 -21:13:52.3: 13.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:44.52 -21:13:52.3: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9941 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:23.68 -21:07:57.0: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:51.34 -30:03:43.6: 11.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:39:02.73 -24:35:38.4: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:39:02.73 -24:35:38.4: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8909 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:49:37.85 -21:00:30.4: 13.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:37.85 -21:00:30.4: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2612 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:39:41.21 -23:15:45.5: 12.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:51:23.68 -21:07:57.0: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:23.68 -21:07:57.0: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0367 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:42:51.34 -30:03:43.6: 11.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:46:56.05 -20:47:41.4: 13.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:51.34 -30:03:43.6: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8769 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:56.05 -20:47:41.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4695 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:06:24.86 -23:14:51.0: 12.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:24.86 -23:14:51.0: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6124 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:39:41.21 -23:15:45.5: 12.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:39:41.21 -23:15:45.5: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8687 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:41:42.42 -30:36:12.3: 10.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:02.67 -30:19:40.0: 9.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4: 9.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4: ref_mag=9.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=7.6715 delta=2.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:44:53.56 -29:45:10.6: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:05.09 -30:13:38.5: 10.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:41:42.42 -30:36:12.3: 10.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.32 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:42.42 -30:36:12.3: ref_mag=10.32 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6122 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:43:04.69 -30:35:39.6: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:47.25 -29:24:44.6: 10.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:02.67 -30:19:40.0: 9.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.85 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:02.67 -30:19:40.0: ref_mag=9.85 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.4413 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:47.25 -29:24:44.6: 11.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:47.25 -29:24:44.6: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3240 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:44:53.56 -29:45:10.6: 11.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:44:53.56 -29:45:10.6: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.1576 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:05.09 -30:13:38.5: 10.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:53.19 -27:48:00.7: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:05.09 -30:13:38.5: ref_mag=10.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.4618 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:43:04.69 -30:35:39.6: 11.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:04.69 -30:35:39.6: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2321 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8: 11.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:17.85 -20:51:10.8: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:37.07 -27:38:54.2: 14.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4: 11.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.6028 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:03:53.19 -27:48:00.7: 14.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8: 11.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.7105 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:55:17.85 -20:51:10.8: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:17.85 -20:51:10.8: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9039 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:34.12 -27:29:50.1: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:43:37.07 -27:38:54.2: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:34.12 -27:29:50.1: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:34.12 -27:29:50.1: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5663 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:38:50.33 -30:56:13.1: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8: 11.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9141 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:38:50.33 -30:56:13.1: 11.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:50.33 -30:56:13.1: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8816 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8: 12.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4: 12.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8: 12.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=10.8597 delta=1.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4: 12.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=10.8366 delta=1.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9: 11.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9849 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:31.11 -29:46:32.1: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:31.11 -29:46:32.1: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6: 12.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0484 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:44.86 -30:14:04.5: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:44.86 -30:14:04.5: 11.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:44.86 -30:14:04.5: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0313 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:43:37.50 -30:59:10.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:43:37.50 -30:59:10.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:37.50 -30:59:10.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:50.99 -30:20:01.5: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:46:22.44 -29:22:10.8: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:50.99 -30:20:01.5: 11.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:50.99 -30:20:01.5: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0461 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:46:22.44 -29:22:10.8: 11.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:22.44 -29:22:10.8: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1372 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:44:27.66 -30:59:12.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:40:13.89 -31:01:43.4: 11.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:44:27.66 -30:59:12.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:27.66 -30:59:12.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:40:13.89 -31:01:43.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:13.89 -31:01:43.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:39:20.77 -30:42:44.7: 11.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:24.23 -29:51:56.6: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:39:20.77 -30:42:44.7: 11.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:20.77 -30:42:44.7: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2677 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:24.23 -29:51:56.6: 12.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:45:24.23 -29:51:56.6: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1522 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:43:32.25 -30:34:15.9: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:40:51.00 -30:25:59.0: 11.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:43:32.25 -30:34:15.9: 12.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:32.25 -30:34:15.9: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1748 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:40:51.00 -30:25:59.0: 11.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:51.00 -30:25:59.0: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3157 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1: 12.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5: 12.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3146 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1: 12.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3207 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:04.14 -21:42:57.0: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9: 13.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:04.14 -21:42:57.0: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:03.46 -20:56:36.2: 12.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9: 12.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.3118 delta=1.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7: 12.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4162 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:16:03.46 -20:56:36.2: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:03.46 -20:56:36.2: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3779 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:28.80 -21:36:58.6: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:07:28.80 -21:36:58.6: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:28.80 -21:36:58.6: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5500 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:13.43 -30:11:41.0: 12.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:02.01 -24:32:27.2: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:45:13.43 -30:11:41.0: 12.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:13.43 -30:11:41.0: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4995 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:41:07.63 -30:29:50.0: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:02.01 -24:32:27.2: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:41:07.63 -30:29:50.0: 11.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:07.63 -30:29:50.0: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5448 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:43:20.19 -30:14:34.4: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:40:06.42 -30:57:30.1: 12.16 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:43:20.19 -30:14:34.4: 12.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:20.19 -30:14:34.4: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5269 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3: 13.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:40:06.42 -30:57:30.1: 12.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:06.42 -30:57:30.1: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=11.6415 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3: 13.92 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=11.6667 delta=2.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:00.77 -23:00:46.8: 12.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:39:55.84 -30:49:09.3: 12.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:47:00.77 -23:00:46.8: 12.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:00.77 -23:00:46.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8608 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:39:55.84 -30:49:09.3: 12.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:55.84 -30:49:09.3: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.7235 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:29:27.26 -24:12:53.7: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:29:27.26 -24:12:53.7: 12.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:27.26 -24:12:53.7: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4494 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:19.94 -24:24:03.6: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:00:19.94 -24:24:03.6: 12.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:19.94 -24:24:03.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8251 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:40:21.17 -30:34:47.9: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:49.27 -24:26:02.6: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:40:21.17 -30:34:47.9: 12.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:21.17 -30:34:47.9: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7820 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:49.27 -24:26:02.6: 12.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:49.27 -24:26:02.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7133 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1: 13.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:03.69 -20:43:47.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1: 12.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.0031 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:00:03.69 -20:43:47.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:03.69 -20:43:47.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:44.53 -22:33:41.5: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:13:44.53 -22:33:41.5: 13.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:44.53 -22:33:41.5: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9154 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:30.06 -21:33:31.8: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:13:30.06 -21:33:31.8: 12.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:30.06 -21:33:31.8: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0364 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6: 13.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.9890 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:42.99 -23:04:26.3: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:41.17 -21:13:53.8: 13.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:20:42.99 -23:04:26.3: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:42.99 -23:04:26.3: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9292 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:16.88 -22:38:45.0: 14.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:45:41.17 -21:13:53.8: 13.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:41.17 -21:13:53.8: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5469 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:53:16.88 -22:38:45.0: 14.55 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:16.88 -22:38:45.0: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5379 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:25:51.05 -22:40:14.4: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:44.74 -23:18:57.3: 14.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:25:51.05 -22:40:14.4: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:00:44.74 -23:18:57.3: 13.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:44.74 -23:18:57.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3626 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:33.35 -29:19:14.7: 12.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:41:32.93 -26:40:19.4: 13.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:41:32.93 -26:40:19.4: 12.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:41:32.93 -26:40:19.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.6938 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:41:33.35 -29:19:14.7: 12.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:33.35 -29:19:14.7: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2589 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2: 13.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8: 13.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0501 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2: 13.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.5739 delta=1.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2: 12.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3793 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:26.43 -28:41:54.8: 13.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:42:26.43 -28:41:54.8: 12.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:26.43 -28:41:54.8: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.1504 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:42:47.76 -30:15:19.3: 11.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:39:51.58 -28:39:19.0: 9.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:39:51.58 -28:39:19.0: 9.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:39:51.58 -28:39:19.0: ref_mag=9.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.5595 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:42:47.76 -30:15:19.3: 11.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:47.76 -30:15:19.3: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1655 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12242.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13972.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158914.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159268.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159288.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159399.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159419.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159436.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159454.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159662.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159676.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159751.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159785.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159797.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159948.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160091.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160535.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160632.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50026.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56028.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 83s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 31s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:32.79 -25:25:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158854_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158854_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:33.32 -24:00:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158856_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158856_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158863_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158863_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:17.60 -22:04:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158869_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158869_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158870_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158870_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:35.66 -20:44:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158879_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158879_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158882_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158882_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158885_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158885_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158886_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158886_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:16.10 -21:10:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158887_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158887_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:35.77 -26:54:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158889_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158889_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:44.92 -24:22:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158891_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158891_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158895_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158895_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158896_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158896_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:50.72 -27:50:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158897_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158897_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:06.29 -23:57:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158898_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158898_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:38.72 -28:45:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158902_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158902_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:59.85 -29:41:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158914_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 158914_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158921_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158921_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158948_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158948_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158967_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158967_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:46.57 -30:51:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158977_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158977_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158986_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 158986_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159002_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159002_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:41.19 -30:39:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159006_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159006_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159035_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159035_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.17 -22:42:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159068_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159068_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:33.86 -20:55:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159081_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159081_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:08.17 -30:49:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159087_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159087_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:48.20 -22:43:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159120_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159120_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159130_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159130_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159139_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159139_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159172_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159172_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159207_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159207_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:16.61 -30:49:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159241_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159241_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:00.49 -30:55:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159250_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159250_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159263_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159263_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159268_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159268_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159278_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159278_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159288_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159288_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159294_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159294_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159304_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159304_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:31.97 -30:37:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159312_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159312_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:16.19 -30:45:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159399_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159399_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159414_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159414_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.80 -22:23:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159422_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159422_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159432_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159432_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159436_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159436_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159454_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159454_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159455_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159455_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159466_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159466_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159494_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159494_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159503_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159503_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159517_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159517_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:25.36 -26:19:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159526_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159526_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.61 -24:07:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159538_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159538_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159539_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159539_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159545_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159545_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.61 -22:17:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159577_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159577_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159588_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159588_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159589_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159589_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159652_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159652_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159662_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159662_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:20.54 -30:24:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159676_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159676_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159693_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159693_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:04.96 -24:22:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159696_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159696_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.45 -23:54:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159697_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159697_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:14.34 -24:02:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159703_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159703_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:06.70 -30:31:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159745_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159745_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:17.40 -30:52:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159748_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159748_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.81 -22:39:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159751_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159751_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159755_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159755_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:07.21 -30:32:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159756_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159756_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:15.00 -30:48:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159762_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159762_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:30.47 -25:48:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159785_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159785_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159790_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159790_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159794_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159794_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:42.12 -22:09:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159797_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159797_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159805_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159805_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:13.89 -30:56:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159836_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159836_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:12.68 -21:03:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159878_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159878_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:24.28 -28:14:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159895_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159895_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159897_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159897_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:16.34 -24:20:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159902_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159902_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:45.40 -21:40:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159914_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159914_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:35.45 -21:30:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159924_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159924_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159934_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159934_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:11.96 -30:29:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159948_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 159948_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159952_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159952_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159976_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159976_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:35.74 -22:18:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159978_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159978_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159988_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159988_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:41.36 -20:45:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 159991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:51.97 -23:46:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160003_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160003_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:34.76 -30:10:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160006_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160006_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.74 -22:42:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160019_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160019_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160030_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160030_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.92 -21:49:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160031_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160031_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160059_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160059_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160063_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160063_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:37.39 -25:02:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160065_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160065_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:27.39 -21:19:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160091_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 160091_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160096_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160096_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:44.01 -27:03:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160104_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160104_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:29.35 -22:20:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160141_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160141_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:40.60 -22:11:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160143_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160143_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160147_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160147_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160148_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160148_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:46.37 -21:25:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160189_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160189_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:03.39 -30:57:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160197_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160197_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:21.51 -21:14:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160205_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160205_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.23 -23:10:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:24.83 -23:15:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160225_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160225_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:31.13 -21:43:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160231_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160231_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:37.98 -21:14:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160246_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160246_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:42.35 -26:56:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160276_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160276_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:04.79 -20:56:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160292_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160292_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160323_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160323_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:44.65 -24:21:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160325_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160325_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.61 -26:43:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160333_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160333_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:36.48 -30:39:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160340_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160340_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:16.38 -25:26:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160368_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160368_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:46.53 -22:52:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160399_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160399_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.36 -27:20:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160417_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160417_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:07.61 -21:05:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160418_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160418_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160422_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160422_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:16.36 -22:24:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160430_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160430_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:39.89 -25:49:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160456_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160456_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160459_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160459_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:09.34 -23:24:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160479_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160479_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:17.67 -25:10:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160492_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160492_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:36.14 -28:26:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160500_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160500_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:35.31 -22:04:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160520_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160520_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160535_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 160535_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160554_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160554_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.26 -24:05:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160569_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160569_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:25.21 -27:13:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160572_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160572_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160576_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160576_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:39.44 -25:18:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160587_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160587_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:43.44 -22:42:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160589_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160589_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160605_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160605_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.86 -25:29:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160607_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160607_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:04.13 -21:01:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160618_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160618_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:21.34 -20:54:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160619_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160619_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:07.31 -26:28:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160632_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 160632_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160639_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160639_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160643_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160643_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:49.49 -23:34:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160650_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160650_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:54.11 -21:39:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160696_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160696_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:01.53 -21:03:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160720_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160720_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.87 -23:20:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160729_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160729_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160741_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160741_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160780_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160780_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:08.01 -23:28:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160793_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160793_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160813_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160813_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:05.08 -21:13:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160819_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160819_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:43.80 -24:19:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160838_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160838_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:08.76 -29:30:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160848_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 160848_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160852_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160852_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:55.79 -22:48:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160889_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160889_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160908_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160908_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:49.86 -22:29:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49206_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 49206_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:44.65 -27:19:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39042_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 39042_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:20.43 -27:49:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.52 -23:48:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156477_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156477_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.19 -26:25:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89809_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 89809_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:20.03 -24:33:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91787_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 91787_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.16 -24:13:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19540_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 19540_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56028_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 56028_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64540_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 64540_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:11.38 -26:14:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51402_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 51402_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.77 -26:56:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13972_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 13972_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77522_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 77522_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:49.90 -25:20:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50026_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 50026_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 12242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.87 -25:10:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03697_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 03697_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:29.14 -30:55:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66141_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 66141_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:23.92 -26:10:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122726_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 122726_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:46.16 -22:32:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.88 -29:04:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57684_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 57684_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:55.93 -26:43:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75953_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 75953_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:15.25 -25:15:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27660_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 27660_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.56 -23:19:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:46.94 -23:43:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136052_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 136052_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:19.57 -23:35:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99612_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 99612_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.16 -23:00:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 12580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:09.70 -30:02:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.40 -22:34:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157429_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157429_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:48.99 -27:20:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25126_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 25126_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:09.76 -28:59:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156652_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156652_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.93 -28:00:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111334_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 111334_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:12.55 -21:41:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156627_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156627_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.26 -28:17:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.08 -28:51:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 26547_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:08.60 -28:46:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.47 -27:50:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62549_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 62549_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156482_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156482_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.44 -23:55:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136535_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 136535_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.35 -23:36:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.68 -28:06:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156387_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156387_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.27 -28:37:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156280_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156280_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.44 -28:02:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156133_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156133_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.22 -22:07:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143752_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 143752_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:27.04 -20:55:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68174_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 68174_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:02.57 -25:51:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48729_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 48729_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:32.29 -27:16:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56356_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 56356_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.67 -26:46:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08383_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 08383_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14910_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 14910_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:51.32 -29:51:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84726_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 84726_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.74 -24:44:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51151_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 51151_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:10.56 -26:58:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32093_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 32093_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:32.33 -28:24:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26693_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 26693_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09596_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 09596_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98259_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 98259_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:30.77 -22:06:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.35 -25:35:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95801_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 95801_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_22-04-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:33.20 -21:27:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 8s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 122s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6
19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5
19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2
19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2
19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4
19:44:53.56 -29:45:10.6
19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4
19:03:53.19 -27:48:00.7
18:43:37.07 -27:38:54.2
19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8
19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8
19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8
19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4
19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9
19:12:31.11 -29:46:32.1
19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6
19:45:24.23 -29:51:56.6
19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5
19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1
19:42:04.14 -21:42:57.0
19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9
19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7
18:56:02.01 -24:32:27.2
19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3
19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1
19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6
19:25:51.05 -22:40:14.4
19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8
19:41:32.93 -26:40:19.4
########### Completed Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6
19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5
19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4
19:44:53.56 -29:45:10.6
19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4
19:03:53.19 -27:48:00.7
18:43:37.07 -27:38:54.2
19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8
19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8
19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8
19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4
19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9
19:12:31.11 -29:46:32.1
19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6
19:45:24.23 -29:51:56.6
19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5
19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1
19:42:04.14 -21:42:57.0
19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9
19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7
18:56:02.01 -24:32:27.2
19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3
19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1
19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6
19:25:51.05 -22:40:14.4
19:41:32.93 -26:40:19.4
19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2
19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8
19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2
###################################################################################
19:08:53.44 -22:06:46.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:44:53.56 -29:45:10.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:03:53.19 -27:48:00.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
18:43:37.07 -27:38:54.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:12:31.11 -29:46:32.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:24.23 -29:51:56.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:04.14 -21:42:57.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:56:02.01 -24:32:27.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:25:51.05 -22:40:14.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
19:41:32.93 -26:40:19.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2 -- a known variable star
19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8 -- a known variable star
19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1 -- not a known variable star
19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7 -- not a known variable star
19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6 -- not a known variable star
19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6 -- not a known variable star
19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8 -- not a known variable star
19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2 -- a known variable star
19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9 -- not a known variable star
19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8 -- not a known variable star
19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4 -- not a known variable star
19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8 -- not a known variable star
19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5 -- not a known variable star
19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1 -- not a known variable star
19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4 -- a known variable star
19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4 -- not a known variable star
19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9 -- not a known variable star
19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5 -- not a known variable star
19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3 -- not a known variable star
Found 15 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
19 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
19:05:37.74 -29:58:06.2
19:19:14.05 -27:16:28.8
19:39:44.03 -31:00:01.1
19:40:24.24 -30:41:41.7
19:40:45.52 -30:38:33.6
19:42:11.82 -30:47:32.6
19:42:38.99 -30:39:13.8
19:42:43.46 -29:54:30.2
19:42:47.02 -30:33:13.9
19:42:55.10 -30:02:38.8
19:42:58.29 -30:40:57.4
19:43:10.07 -30:43:41.8
19:43:56.93 -30:08:43.5
19:45:15.41 -30:04:45.1
19:45:19.54 -30:15:38.4
19:45:22.73 -30:53:52.4
19:45:25.70 -30:35:28.9
19:45:36.93 -30:46:46.5
19:46:12.26 -30:29:46.3
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461236.62761441 -observatory V36
07:19:31.13 +17:12:14.4 Mercury (5.2mag)
10:31:23.79 +10:32:43.3 Venus (-4.1mag)
04:38:19.81 +21:58:48.0 Mars (1.3mag)
08:21:01.31 +19:57:35.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:18.22 +03:21:53.5 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:08:07.45 +20:47:27.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:58.83 +00:20:07.7 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:30:28.26 -23:20:06.7 Pluto (14.4mag)
08:17:33.89 +21:20:37.2 Moon (-8.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 15 00:59 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461236.62761441:
08:20:57.67 +19:57:50.8 Io (6.1mag)
08:21:10.09 +19:57:01.9 Europa (6.3mag)
08:20:51.38 +19:58:16.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:20:46.88 +19:58:26.2 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:19:19.95 +19:43:49.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:21:02.07 +19:57:33.2 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:18:40.66 +19:47:14.2 Elara (17.7mag)
08:24:42.05 +19:49:12.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:25:42.63 +20:03:22.8 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:27.78 +03:21:28.3 Titan (8.5mag)
00:56:13.19 +03:21:51.3 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:55:43.69 +03:20:10.9 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:56:07.53 +03:22:15.6 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:56:12.58 +03:18:25.5 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 15 00:59 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461236.62761441:
17:53:58.33 -31:54:08.4 JWST
13:16:59.62 +58:34:15.5 Chandra
08:32:25.62 -47:04:05.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 15 00:59 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461236.62761441 -observatory V36
02:42:59.83 +14:59:14.3 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:14:21.76 -34:28:58.8 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:30:26.81 -68:13:17.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:02:27.04 +32:31:45.0 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
02:13:19.05 +16:44:57.7 15.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:56:34.93 +32:15:45.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:17:49.17 +26:52:52.4 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:59:41.81 +29:33:59.8 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:12:49.85 +05:05:07.1 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:04:21.32 +21:05:55.9 18.0mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:11:11.43 -11:30:07.5 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:43:20.84 +67:33:48.3 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:21:45.89 -10:34:30.0 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:09:00.12 +65:58:11.7 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:39:01.49 +30:14:35.5 14.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:14:06.99 +15:26:33.9 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:35:09.34 +40:17:13.0 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:42:29.15 +46:42:10.1 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
04:54:07.23 -13:35:21.6 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:38:29.56 +28:16:21.7 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:17:36.93 -13:19:34.0 16.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:01:41.91 +22:13:35.1 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:46:17.78 +03:43:34.2 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:38:53.69 +79:10:02.7 17.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:51:10.35 +45:26:28.9 16.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:28:37.15 +05:21:57.4 17.0mag A/2026 E1
21:26:27.65 -16:51:00.1 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:15:44.27 -02:05:50.0 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:07:01.19 +30:04:03.7 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:18:02.57 +12:29:06.2 17.1mag 63P/Wild
00:50:18.67 -05:03:06.0 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
04:38:56.03 +20:24:25.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:29:55.36 +11:15:06.3 16.3mag 88P/Howell
06:49:39.68 +30:13:36.8 15.7mag 93P/Lovas
04:36:33.80 +31:17:03.8 16.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:20:21.84 +30:09:18.5 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:57:04.24 -00:45:07.8 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos
04:59:22.97 +20:56:27.2 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:45:14.07 +19:39:53.5 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
00:02:43.69 +03:06:35.3 17.9mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
07:30:51.30 +15:58:18.5 16.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:18:44.74 -20:43:11.2 15.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
05:50:17.12 +34:55:43.5 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring
18:50:49.71 +18:11:15.2 14.3mag 169P/NEAT
01:52:19.94 +08:06:40.6 17.7mag 220P/McNaught
16:35:31.79 -08:35:18.1 17.1mag 235P/LINEAR
08:55:18.89 +32:51:03.0 18.0mag 240P/NEAT
20:39:52.54 -50:34:07.4 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
02:12:43.11 +14:19:41.1 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
05:51:44.92 +37:11:52.5 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR
15:06:28.67 +05:37:24.4 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski
08:38:54.21 +19:28:49.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:59:14.82 +38:49:04.0 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.6K Jul 15 00:59 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 15 00:59 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 15 00:59 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:17:51.308 -00:47:18.69 AT 2026ubz 2026-07-09.38 21.8767
22:50:38.435 -08:50:23.60 AT 2026uby 2026-07-09.34 22.2275
22:47:24.698 -06:06:23.35 AT 2026ubx 2026-07-09.34 23.256
22:56:00.968 -11:40:11.78 AT 2026ubw 2026-07-09.34 22.1585
23:24:42.862 +02:16:46.36 AT 2026ubv 2026-07-09.41 22.7993
22:45:14.951 -12:30:44.06 AT 2026ubu 2026-07-07.42 23.0269
21:48:25.112 -16:15:06.82 AT 2026ubt 2026-07-07.42 22.6297
22:49:23.723 -15:30:28.94 AT 2026ubs 2026-07-07.41 23.1172
22:47:25.707 -13:21:20.99 AT 2026ubr 2026-07-07.42 22.9851
22:48:27.713 -14:51:00.69 AT 2026ubq 2026-07-07.41 23.5158
22:55:15.603 -17:20:52.24 AT 2026ubp 2026-07-07.41 22.73
00:01:17.781 -03:06:59.77 AT 2026ubo 2026-06-30.36 21.0986
23:48:53.692 +00:34:05.28 AT 2026ubn 2026-06-30.37 21.2974
23:55:47.866 +01:29:21.94 AT 2026ubm 2026-06-30.37 22.7418
23:56:07.829 -00:07:55.59 AT 2026ubl 2026-06-30.36 22.5755
22:50:20.382 -04:24:01.18 AT 2026ubk 2026-06-30.33 21.8405
23:52:09.876 +01:40:51.93 AT 2026ubj 2026-06-30.37 22.5344
23:48:54.336 +01:46:33.67 AT 2026ubi 2026-06-30.37 22.1609
22:50:27.464 -01:58:53.77 AT 2026ubh 2026-06-30.33 21.7659
22:58:59.868 -08:03:37.23 AT 2026ubg 2026-06-30.38 21.6329
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 15 00:59 tns_transients_list.txt