This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.2993 2461235.7993 12.47 20:10:06.75 -13:53:19.6
28.88694 -23.59366 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix -0 1 1 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:10:06.75 -13:53:19.6: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:10:06.75 -13:53:19.6: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 14.2993* 20 10 06.75 -13 53 19.6 12.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.7993,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.2993 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.2993 2461235.7993 13.34 20:21:54.54 -16:48:28.6
27.14969 -27.35519 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1819 Laputa -1 1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:21:54.54 -16:48:28.6: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:21:54.54 -16:48:28.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 14.2993* 20 21 54.54 -16 48 28.6 13.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.7993,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.2993 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.2993 2461235.7993 13.78 20:10:28.62 -17:26:28.4
25.33916 -25.06981 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1245 Calvinia 0 -0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:10:28.62 -17:26:28.4: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:10:28.62 -17:26:28.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 14.2993* 20 10 28.62 -17 26 28.4 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.7993,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.2993 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.2993 2461235.7993 13.92 20:05:16.38 -19:50:35.3
22.37386 -24.82453 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2379 Heiskanen -0 1 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:05:16.38 -19:50:35.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:05:16.38 -19:50:35.3: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.7993,13.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.2993 13.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.2993 2461235.7993 14.02 20:14:04.25 -20:08:16.5
22.90222 -26.85751 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1105 Fragaria -0 -1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:14:04.25 -20:08:16.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:14:04.25 -20:08:16.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 14.2993* 20 14 04.25 -20 08 16.5 14.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.7993,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.2993 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.2993 2461235.7993 13.16 20:34:24.18 -21:29:55.0
23.32200 -31.78580 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J203424.17-212955.0
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 V 13.770 V 2457227.94900 3.242350000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:34:24.18 -21:29:55.0: 14.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:34:24.18 -21:29:55.0: 14.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 14.2993* 20 34 24.18 -21 29 55.0 13.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203424.17-212955.0,2461235.7993,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203424.17-212955.0 20260714.2993 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461235.79958893 14.07.2026 07:11:14.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7948
Objects passed selection criteria: 7939
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7473.25
Average stars matched: 7353.25 (98.3943 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 14 03:35:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461235.79958893 14.07.2026 07:11:14.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 197
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 63089
Objects passed selection criteria: 62962
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59530.5
Average stars matched: 57508 (96.6026 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 170636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 14 03:37:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461235.79909400
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.082 -17:59:36.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:40.082 -17:59:36.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0175 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:42.598 -17:59:43.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:42.598 -17:59:43.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0170 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:40.082 -17:59:36.93
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:42.598 -17:59:43.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01016 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3XNICq5Pzg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cu0zbsWZo2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fIDu5OTk4b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oNRCEfKVmu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.687900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.687900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 10456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2184 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2671 to -12.6728 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2184 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2671 to -12.6728 deg
Loaded 8299 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6584 out of 6783 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6783 out of 10456 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3XNICq5Pzg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=584, bad_region=2239, passed=10504
Got 10504 stars (including 7777 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=284 n_q2=216 n_q3=283 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cu0zbsWZo2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=591, bad_region=2237, passed=10452
Got 10452 stars (including 7731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=290 n_q2=218 n_q3=280 n_q4=180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.042
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fIDu5OTk4b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=537, bad_region=1686, passed=8445
Got 8445 stars (including 6324 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8445 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=288 n_q2=211 n_q3=289 n_q4=180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oNRCEfKVmu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=1694, passed=8532
Got 8532 stars (including 6410 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8532 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=281 n_q2=216 n_q3=287 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.131
ref2=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.042
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.178
reference average sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.0865
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-10-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-14_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_021151_TTUQ2b1x1_2746761_tIV1euil/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:19:34.13 -19:04:23.4: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:03:17.91 -21:07:23.6: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:26:32.76 -16:32:34.2: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:22:21.13 -20:13:34.2: 9.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:03:17.91 -21:07:23.6: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:19:34.13 -19:04:23.4: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:26:32.76 -16:32:34.2: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:17.91 -21:07:23.6: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9731 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:22:21.13 -20:13:34.2: 9.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:34.13 -19:04:23.4: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6709 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:32.76 -16:32:34.2: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9123 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:21.13 -20:13:34.2: ref_mag=9.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0385 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20406_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20406_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20423_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20426_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20426_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:38.57 -13:56:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20429_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20429_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20431_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 20431_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92372_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92372_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92376_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92376_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92381_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92381_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92382_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92382_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92384_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92384_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92392_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92392_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92395_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92395_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92397_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92397_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92401_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92401_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92404_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92404_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92405_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92405_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92407_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92407_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92409_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92409_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92410_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92410_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92413_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92413_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92416_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92416_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92417_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92417_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92425_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92425_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92427_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92427_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92428_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92428_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92433_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92433_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92438_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92438_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92439_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92439_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92442_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92442_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92443_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92443_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92447_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92447_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92452_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92452_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92454_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92454_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92457_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92457_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92461_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92461_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92463_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92463_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92464_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92464_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92466_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92466_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92467_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92467_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92468_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92468_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92470_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92470_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92476_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92476_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92478_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92478_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92491_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92491_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92492_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92492_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92494_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92494_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92496_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92496_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92497_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92497_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92502_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92502_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92503_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92503_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92505_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92505_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92510_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92510_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92511_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92511_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92512_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92512_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92513_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92513_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92515_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92515_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92516_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92516_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92517_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92517_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92518_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92518_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92520_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92520_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92523_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92523_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92524_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92524_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92530_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92530_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92564_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92564_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92568_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 92568_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92586_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92586_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92601_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 92601_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92631_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 92631_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92637_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 92637_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92643_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92643_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92651_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92651_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92652_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92652_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92661_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92661_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92669_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92669_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92690_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 92690_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92700_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92700_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92701_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92701_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92722_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92722_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92726_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92726_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92733_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92733_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92737_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92737_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92757_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92757_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92770_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92770_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92777_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92777_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92780_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92780_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92784_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92784_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92790_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92790_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92796_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92796_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92803_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92803_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92811_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92811_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92812_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92812_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92825_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92825_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92826_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92826_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92840_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92840_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92844_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92844_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92845_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92845_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92859_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92859_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92865_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92865_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92880_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92880_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92885_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92885_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92886_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92886_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92887_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92887_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92893_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92893_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92894_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92894_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92896_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92896_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92898_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92898_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92906_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92906_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92914_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92914_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92922_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92922_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92940_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 92940_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93046_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255
The candidate 93046_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_02-11-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0255 did not pass the final checks
