This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.1317 2461235.6317 8.96 19:10:00.50 -22:01:43.7
14.96634 -13.75696 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 1 -0 1 9.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:00.50 -22:01:43.7: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:10:00.50 -22:01:43.7: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.6317,8.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.1317 8.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.1317 2461235.6317 11.18 19:04:50.81 -27:44:52.2
9.07230 -14.97243 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 1 -0 1 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:50.81 -27:44:52.2: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:04:50.81 -27:44:52.2: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.6317,11.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.1317 11.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.1317 2461235.6317 11.32 19:13:24.70 -29:41:40.2
7.94568 -17.45127 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -3 -2 4 11.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:24.70 -29:41:40.2: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:13:24.70 -29:41:40.2: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.6317,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.1317 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.1317 2461235.6317 12.41 18:57:01.37 -24:34:12.5
11.33260 -12.08270 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne -1 1 2 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:01.37 -24:34:12.5: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:57:01.37 -24:34:12.5: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.6317,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.1317 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.1317 2461235.6317 12.53 18:42:55.57 -28:44:13.1
6.12534 -10.96773 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX21" Gaia DR3 4071588765697907200
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.140 G 17.320 G 0.511020000000 F
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa 0 1 1 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:55.57 -28:44:13.1: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:42:55.57 -28:44:13.1: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4071588765697907200,2461235.6317,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4071588765697907200 20260714.1317 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.1317 2461235.6317 12.97 19:26:42.60 -22:38:29.7
15.97400 -17.54504 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX21" Gaia DR3 6772336047594997888
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.300 G 17.400 G 0.436012000000 F
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.468 Lina -0 0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:42.60 -22:38:29.7: 14.89 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:26:42.60 -22:38:29.7: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6772336047594997888,2461235.6317,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6772336047594997888 20260714.1317 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.1317 2461235.6317 13.04 19:11:56.56 -25:59:42.4
11.38685 -15.74344 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2013 Tucapel -1 2 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:56.56 -25:59:42.4: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:11:56.56 -25:59:42.4: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.6317,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.1317 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 14.1317 2461235.6317 11.35 18:44:35.01 -27:38:23.1
7.29505 -10.83370 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides 2 -1 2 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:35.01 -27:38:23.1: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:44:35.01 -27:38:23.1: 13.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461235.6317,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260714.1317 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461235.63196509 14.07.2026 03:09:51.784 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7846
Objects passed selection criteria: 7829
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6656.25
Average stars matched: 6635 (99.6808 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118580 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 13 22:19:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461235.63196509 14.07.2026 03:09:51.784 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 82
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 44 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95234
Objects passed selection criteria: 95082
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 81968.2
Average stars matched: 81099.8 (98.9404 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1965268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 13 18:59:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-151-g9f3411f7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 13 22:23:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461235.63138464
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 940.9'x625.1' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.659 -26:00:07.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.659 -26:00:07.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0016 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 940.8'x625.1' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.100 -26:00:12.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.100 -26:00:12.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:00.659 -26:00:07.00
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:58.100 -26:00:12.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00970 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LGLwLXbK7D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mNhDJaW2Lv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E0oAnhuq0f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.80bIfeSDU2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.547700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.547700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13383 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7396 out of 7628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7628 out of 9734 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LGLwLXbK7D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=2274, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 10138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=321 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mNhDJaW2Lv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=677, bad_region=1820, passed=9734
Got 9734 stars (including 7369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.714 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=309 n_q2=152 n_q3=284 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.E0oAnhuq0f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=367, bad_region=637, passed=4551
Got 4551 stars (including 3612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.839 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.785 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.919 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.955 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.699 n_q1=310 n_q2=117 n_q3=323 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.80bIfeSDU2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=361, bad_region=655, passed=4641
Got 4641 stars (including 3675 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.874 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.855 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.221 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.968 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.676 n_q1=313 n_q2=116 n_q3=321 n_q4=179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.397
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.371
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.555 worst_q_ratio=1.286
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits sigma_overall=0.839 worst_q_ratio=1.139
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.874 worst_q_ratio=1.397
reference average sigma_overall=0.5305 worst_q_ratio=1.3285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.76 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (929 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.79 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:00.50 -22:01:43.7: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:10:00.50 -22:01:43.7: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20059.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20059_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 20059_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20013_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 20013_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.49 -22:34:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.33 -28:51:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 20015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.80 -23:56:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20014_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 20014_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.84 -29:04:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:10:00.50 -22:01:43.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 940.9'x625.1' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.659 -26:00:07.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.659 -26:00:07.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0016 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 940.8'x625.1' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.100 -26:00:12.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.100 -26:00:12.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:00.659 -26:00:07.00
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:58.100 -26:00:12.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00970 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fx9POheQRH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L2nXiOaCpg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qzNUXnAvSE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tXfTKwFGND
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.361800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.361800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 111498 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13436 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9982 out of 11636 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11636 out of 111498 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Fx9POheQRH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=17584, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 115576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=325 n_q2=171 n_q3=233 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.513
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L2nXiOaCpg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=8357, bad_region=13286, passed=111486
Got 111486 stars (including 90417 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111486 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.791 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=326 n_q2=172 n_q3=240 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.504
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qzNUXnAvSE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2901, bad_region=7197, passed=58905
Got 58905 stars (including 48963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58905 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.873 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.826 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.042 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.029 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.670 n_q1=330 n_q2=139 n_q3=266 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tXfTKwFGND (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2984, bad_region=7295, passed=60081
Got 60081 stars (including 49930 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.875 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.812 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.150 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.919 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.704 n_q1=330 n_q2=139 n_q3=264 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_221154_TTUQ2b1x1_1154016_osVtDuvB/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:17.55 -22:04:30.6: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:17.21 -22:01:01.7: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:41.15 -26:32:14.8: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:26.52 -23:33:17.4: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:16.12 -27:14:24.0: 12.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:35.50 -27:45:23.0: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:08.40 -26:30:52.9: 12.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:11.38 -29:40:37.7: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:46.08 -28:53:48.9: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:35.60 -26:54:02.1: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:46:17.21 -22:01:01.7: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:04:41.15 -26:32:14.8: 12.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:08.40 -26:30:52.9: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:07:11.38 -29:40:37.7: 12.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:35.50 -27:45:23.0: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:16:46.08 -28:53:48.9: 13.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:04:26.52 -23:33:17.4: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:53:16.12 -27:14:24.0: 12.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:17.55 -22:04:30.6: 12.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:17.21 -22:01:01.7: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7325 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:41.15 -26:32:14.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6933 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:08.40 -26:30:52.9: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0082 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:11.38 -29:40:37.7: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9268 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:35.50 -27:45:23.0: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0069 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:46.08 -28:53:48.9: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1236 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:26.52 -23:33:17.4: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8733 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:16.12 -27:14:24.0: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1346 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:17.55 -22:04:30.6: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6399 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:55:35.60 -26:54:02.1: 12.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:35.60 -26:54:02.1: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4830 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:40.11 -27:26:44.4: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:23.67 -26:57:55.1: 12.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:50.81 -27:44:52.2: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:24.70 -29:41:40.2: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:34.13 -27:29:49.6: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:55.57 -28:44:13.1: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:01.37 -24:34:12.5: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:07.64 -28:31:11.1: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:07:40.11 -27:26:44.4: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:40.11 -27:26:44.4: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8597 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:04:50.81 -27:44:52.2: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:48:23.67 -26:57:55.1: 12.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:23.67 -26:57:55.1: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1522 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:13:24.70 -29:41:40.2: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:34.13 -27:29:49.6: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:57:01.37 -24:34:12.5: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:42:55.57 -28:44:13.1: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:34.13 -27:29:49.6: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6351 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:42:07.64 -28:31:11.1: 12.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:07.64 -28:31:11.1: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7932 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:42.60 -22:38:29.7: 14.89 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:56.56 -25:59:42.4: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:26:42.60 -22:38:29.7: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:26:42.60 -22:38:29.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=12.9247 delta=1.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:11:56.56 -25:59:42.4: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:35.01 -27:38:23.1: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:44:35.01 -27:38:23.1: 13.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:44:35.01 -27:38:23.1: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.3487 delta=1.90 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158696.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158700.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158787.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158794.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158855.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42692.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158584_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158584_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158586_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158586_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158592_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158592_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158595_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158595_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158603_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158603_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158615_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158615_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158616_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158616_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158619_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158619_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:13.27 -23:27:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158622_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158622_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158628_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158628_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158643_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158643_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158650_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158650_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158652_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158652_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:16.74 -23:01:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158653_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158653_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:38.78 -22:37:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158654_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158654_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:53.88 -29:49:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158659_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158659_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158660_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158660_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:33.01 -28:52:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158661_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158661_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:24.28 -27:44:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158666_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158666_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:00.50 -22:01:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158696_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 158696_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158700_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 158700_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158716_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158716_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158736_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158736_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:25.34 -26:18:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158785_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158785_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.48 -23:54:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158787_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 158787_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158794_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 158794_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158815_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158815_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158829_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158829_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:16.22 -24:20:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158830_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158830_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.66 -24:07:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158839_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158839_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:30.65 -25:48:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158854_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158854_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:42.18 -26:56:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158855_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 158855_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158888_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 158888_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158910_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 158910_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:08.59 -29:30:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.45 -25:35:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157223_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 157223_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.01 -27:20:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.76 -25:10:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156537_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 156537_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.92 -28:00:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156383_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 156383_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.42 -23:55:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156378_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 156378_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.37 -26:25:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42692_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 42692_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156306_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 156306_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.34 -28:37:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.87 -29:04:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.61 -23:19:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.48 -27:50:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.59 -23:48:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.47 -22:34:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.20 -28:51:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136535_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 136535_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_22-09-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
