This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3565 2461234.8565 12.52 16:47:20.67 +13:34:16.4
31.58357 33.56482 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ROTSE1 J164720.66+133415.2
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 V 14.200 V 2453490.00000 147.700000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:47:20.67 +13:34:16.4: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:47:20.67 +13:34:16.4: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3565* 16 47 20.67 +13 34 16.4 12.5 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ROTSE1 J164720.66+133415.2,2461234.8565,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ROTSE1 J164720.66+133415.2 20260713.3565 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3565 2461234.8565 13.12 17:22:32.47 +18:31:42.0
40.67123 27.65025 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 4553549104888650368
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.710 G 13.760 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:22:32.47 +18:31:42.0: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:22:32.47 +18:31:42.0: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3565* 17 22 32.47 +18 31 42.0 13.1 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4553549104888650368,2461234.8565,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4553549104888650368 20260713.3565 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3565 2461234.8565 13.21 17:23:48.30 +18:20:16.6
40.59620 27.30144 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 4553528867002949376
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.760 G 13.780 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:48.30 +18:20:16.6: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:48.30 +18:20:16.6: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3565* 17 23 48.30 +18 20 16.6 13.2 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4553528867002949376,2461234.8565,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4553528867002949376 20260713.3565 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3565 2461234.8565 13.07 17:24:14.09 +18:26:13.7
40.74228 27.24330 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 17:24:14.09 +18:26:13.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.564+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:24:14.09 +18:26:13.7: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:24:14.09 +18:26:13.7: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3565* 17 24 14.09 +18 26 13.7 13.1 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461234.8565,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260713.3565 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3565 2461234.8565 11.70 17:04:32.89 +14:26:33.7
34.48232 30.08474 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1124 Her
Type: RRAB/BL
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.099 V 12.947 V 2451288.90000 0.551017000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:04:32.89 +14:26:33.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:04:32.89 +14:26:33.7: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3565* 17 04 32.89 +14 26 33.7 11.7 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1124 Her,2461234.8565,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1124 Her 20260713.3565 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3565 2461234.8565 9.65 17:21:25.93 +18:33:16.3
40.58976 27.90438 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" V0479 Her
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.360 V Y 0.890 V 2452960.90000 84.096404000000 M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:21:25.93 +18:33:16.3: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:21:25.93 +18:33:16.3: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.61 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3565* 17 21 25.93 +18 33 16.3 9.7 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0479 Her,2461234.8565,9.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0479 Her 20260713.3565 9.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3565 2461234.8565 13.17 17:23:19.03 +18:29:11.8
40.70377 27.46383 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 17:23:19.03 +18:29:11.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.321+/-0.039 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:19.03 +18:29:11.8: 14.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:19.03 +18:29:11.8: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3565* 17 23 19.03 +18 29 11.8 13.2 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461234.8565,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260713.3565 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3565 2461234.8565 12.89 17:23:43.22 +18:29:43.1
40.75252 27.37815 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 17:23:43.22 +18:29:43.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.617+/-0.029 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:43.22 +18:29:43.1: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:43.22 +18:29:43.1: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3565* 17 23 43.22 +18 29 43.1 12.9 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461234.8565,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260713.3565 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 13.3565 2461234.8565 13.12 17:23:30.76 +18:14:56.8
40.47443 27.33306 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 17:23:30.76 +18:14:56.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F9 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.362+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:30.76 +18:14:56.8: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:30.76 +18:14:56.8: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 13.3565* 17 23 30.76 +18 14 56.8 13.1 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461234.8565,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260713.3565 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.78629625 18.06.2026 06:52:05.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
First image: 2461209.78629625 18.06.2026 06:52:05.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Last image: 2461234.85678402 13.07.2026 08:33:36.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13083
Objects passed selection criteria: 13054
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10310.8
Average stars matched: 10033.8 (97.3135 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 121400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 13 10:48:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.78629625 18.06.2026 06:52:05.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
First image: 2461209.78629625 18.06.2026 06:52:05.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Last image: 2461234.85678402 13.07.2026 08:33:36.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 71 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 80023
Objects passed selection criteria: 79854
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 65545.2
Average stars matched: 63216.2 (96.4467 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1867312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 13 10:54:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461234.85621315
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits'
wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits'
wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.676 +13:59:49.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:33.054 +13:59:30.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.676 +13:59:49.78
Second-epoch image center 16:53:33.054 +13:59:30.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0544 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:30.447 +13:59:50.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.676 +13:59:49.78
Second-epoch image center 16:53:30.447 +13:59:50.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:33.054 +13:59:30.15
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:30.447 +13:59:50.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01191 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SkvUSTfkFT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l5trTJ3O7F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ry1sFuN1Zx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dZUZS5IwdY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits and wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits and wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits and wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits) and catalog (wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 245.1104 to 261.5884 deg, Dec +8.6676 to +19.2473 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 245.1104 to 261.5884 deg, Dec 8.6676 to 19.2473 deg
Loaded 7645 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6255 out of 6563 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6563 out of 13636 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 245.1104 to 261.5884 deg, Dec +8.6676 to +19.2473 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 245.1104 to 261.5884 deg, Dec 8.6676 to 19.2473 deg
Loaded 7645 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6255 out of 6563 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6563 out of 13636 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 13632 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 245.1103 to 261.5883 deg, Dec +8.6686 to +19.2473 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 245.1103 to 261.5883 deg, Dec 8.6686 to 19.2473 deg
Loaded 7645 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6250 out of 6560 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6560 out of 13632 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
2.2 pix Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
2.7 pix fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
2.7 pix fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
15.3 mag. Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SkvUSTfkFT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=852, bad_region=0, passed=13636
Got 13636 stars (including 12773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13636 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.622 n_q1=237 n_q2=240 n_q3=233 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits -region wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l5trTJ3O7F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=834, bad_region=0, passed=13632
Got 13632 stars (including 12787 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13632 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=238 n_q2=243 n_q3=234 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits -region wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ry1sFuN1Zx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, bad_region=1, passed=7095
Got 7095 stars (including 6794 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7095 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=172 n_q2=177 n_q3=339 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dZUZS5IwdY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=286, bad_region=0, passed=7125
Got 7125 stars (including 6834 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7125 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=146 n_q2=184 n_q3=342 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.429
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits sigma_overall=0.497 worst_q_ratio=1.250
ref2=Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits sigma_overall=0.507 worst_q_ratio=1.185
new1=fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.239
new2=fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.429
reference average sigma_overall=0.502 worst_q_ratio=1.2175
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Her-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:04:32.90 +14:26:33.5: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:04:32.90 +14:26:33.5: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:04:32.90 +14:26:33.5: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7143 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21016.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20781_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 20781_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:08.71 +11:35:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20868_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 20868_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:51.71 +09:59:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21016_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 21016_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:32.90 +14:26:33.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.982 4545066299664306176 256.13693952741 +14.44240426039 12.4980 12.0283 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.982#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21024_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 21024_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:50.35 +10:21:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21064_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 21064_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:06.79 +10:54:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05287_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 05287_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:54.00 +14:56:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Her-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.676 +13:59:49.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:33.054 +13:59:30.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.676 +13:59:49.78
Second-epoch image center 16:53:33.054 +13:59:30.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0544 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:30.447 +13:59:50.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.676 +13:59:49.78
Second-epoch image center 16:53:30.447 +13:59:50.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:33.054 +13:59:30.15
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:30.447 +13:59:50.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01191 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MLKfsrIn9b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.orangCVaxm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uLP3WQQ2I2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NVYpEliuYo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits and wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits and wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits and wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits) and catalog (wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86318 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 245.0917 to 261.5884 deg, Dec +8.6676 to +19.2601 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 245.0917 to 261.5884 deg, Dec 8.6676 to 19.2601 deg
Loaded 7657 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5659 out of 6620 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6620 out of 86318 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.661000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.661000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86318 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 245.0917 to 261.5884 deg, Dec +8.6676 to +19.2601 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 245.0917 to 261.5884 deg, Dec 8.6676 to 19.2601 deg
Loaded 7657 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5659 out of 6620 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6620 out of 86318 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 85681 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 245.0957 to 261.5883 deg, Dec +8.6686 to +19.2611 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 245.0957 to 261.5883 deg, Dec 8.6686 to 19.2611 deg
Loaded 7655 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5654 out of 6619 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6619 out of 85681 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
2.1 pix Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
2.6 pix fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
2.6 pix fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
15.5 mag. Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MLKfsrIn9b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=5750, bad_region=0, passed=86284
Got 86284 stars (including 80436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86284 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.561 n_q1=232 n_q2=240 n_q3=240 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits -region wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.orangCVaxm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=5638, bad_region=0, passed=85653
Got 85653 stars (including 79876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85653 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.546 n_q1=231 n_q2=241 n_q3=235 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits -region wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uLP3WQQ2I2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1735, bad_region=35, passed=46391
Got 46391 stars (including 44542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46391 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=174 n_q2=180 n_q3=351 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NVYpEliuYo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1737, bad_region=36, passed=45665
Got 45665 stars (including 43817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=152 n_q2=182 n_q3=347 n_q4=289 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-32-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Her-09-Q1b1x1_033929_TTUQ1b1x1_2782512_XZTJ4kM9/wcs_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Her-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:19:02.60 +09:32:51.3: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:18:53.48 +12:31:44.1: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:24:25.65 +13:49:53.6: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:02:57.72 +14:04:03.3: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:13:22.86 +12:49:10.4: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:09:52.71 +12:15:59.8: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:22:46.37 +10:39:43.2: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:19:02.60 +09:32:51.3: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:22:46.37 +10:39:43.2: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:02.60 +09:32:51.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5605 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:46.37 +10:39:43.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6681 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:59:04.01 +11:32:25.8: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:09:52.71 +12:15:59.8: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:52.71 +12:15:59.8: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5404 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:18:53.48 +12:31:44.1: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:02:57.72 +14:04:03.3: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:24:25.65 +13:49:53.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:13:22.86 +12:49:10.4: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:53.48 +12:31:44.1: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4851 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:57.72 +14:04:03.3: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3293 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:25.65 +13:49:53.6: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9868 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:22.86 +12:49:10.4: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9587 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:28:42.29 +09:24:33.5: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:59:04.01 +11:32:25.8: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:04.01 +11:32:25.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8024 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:14:28.37 +13:03:25.6: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:28:42.29 +09:24:33.5: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:42.29 +09:24:33.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9821 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:57:21.33 +13:02:49.5: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:14:28.37 +13:03:25.6: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:24.91 +13:10:50.1: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:28.37 +13:03:25.6: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9026 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:18:32.74 +12:10:02.2: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:43:18.65 +12:51:29.0: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:22:00.07 +15:46:46.2: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:24.91 +13:10:50.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:24.91 +13:10:50.1: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0151 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:18:32.74 +12:10:02.2: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:22:06.86 +11:35:46.9: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:32.74 +12:10:02.2: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2439 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:57:21.33 +13:02:49.5: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:43:18.65 +12:51:29.0: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:21.33 +13:02:49.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7514 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:18.65 +12:51:29.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8889 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:22:00.07 +15:46:46.2: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:00.07 +15:46:46.2: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8107 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:22:18.41 +09:55:09.4: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:01:29.24 +11:10:46.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:10:55.60 +11:37:09.2: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:22:06.86 +11:35:46.9: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:06.86 +11:35:46.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3981 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:11:05.68 +10:56:28.8: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:22:18.41 +09:55:09.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:18.41 +09:55:09.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3406 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:01:29.24 +11:10:46.8: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:29.24 +11:10:46.8: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2318 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:22:26.21 +15:09:17.3: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:56:46.13 +14:08:11.9: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:10:55.60 +11:37:09.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:55.60 +11:37:09.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4403 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:11:05.68 +10:56:28.8: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:05.68 +10:56:28.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5674 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:14:16.27 +08:57:59.7: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:22:26.21 +15:09:17.3: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:26.21 +15:09:17.3: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0923 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:17:06.62 +11:26:32.1: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:56:46.13 +14:08:11.9: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:46.13 +14:08:11.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2931 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:14:16.27 +08:57:59.7: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:16.27 +08:57:59.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7212 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:07:11.92 +12:08:47.6: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:17:06.62 +11:26:32.1: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:17:06.62 +11:26:32.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7996 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:43:14.63 +12:54:20.6: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:44:40.70 +14:31:08.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:07:11.92 +12:08:47.6: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:11.92 +12:08:47.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7043 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:48:49.35 +14:05:17.6: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:44:40.70 +14:31:08.7: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:40.70 +14:31:08.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4164 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:43:14.63 +12:54:20.6: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:14.63 +12:54:20.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4673 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:42:24.45 +15:13:55.2: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:48:49.35 +14:05:17.6: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:49.35 +14:05:17.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4234 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:47:53.11 +13:48:53.7: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:14.00 +09:05:17.3: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:22:55.05 +09:20:17.1: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:42:24.45 +15:13:55.2: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:24.45 +15:13:55.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4711 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:03:39.92 +13:41:05.9: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:24:01.48 +13:00:06.6: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:47:53.11 +13:48:53.7: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:53.11 +13:48:53.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6721 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:14.00 +09:05:17.3: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:14.00 +09:05:17.3: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2292 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:22:01.38 +10:57:11.4: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:02:40.73 +15:21:56.0: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:22:55.05 +09:20:17.1: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:55.05 +09:20:17.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2880 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:54:59.71 +14:33:36.3: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:02:40.73 +15:21:56.0: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:03:39.92 +13:41:05.9: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:24:01.48 +13:00:06.6: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:39.92 +13:41:05.9: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8718 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:40.73 +15:21:56.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7704 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:01.48 +13:00:06.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5393 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:22:01.38 +10:57:11.4: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:01.38 +10:57:11.4: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8761 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:54:59.71 +14:33:36.3: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:59.71 +14:33:36.3: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9746 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:47:20.67 +13:34:16.4: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:48.30 +18:20:16.6: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:22:32.47 +18:31:42.0: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:47:20.67 +13:34:16.4: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:24:14.09 +18:26:13.7: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:47:20.67 +13:34:16.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5121 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:24:30.37 +18:32:18.8: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:48.30 +18:20:16.6: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:23:48.30 +18:20:16.6: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1908 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:24:14.09 +18:26:13.7: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:24:14.09 +18:26:13.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0414 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:21:25.93 +18:33:16.3: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:22:32.47 +18:31:42.0: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:22:32.47 +18:31:42.0: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0990 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:04:32.89 +14:26:33.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:24:30.37 +18:32:18.8: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:19.03 +18:29:11.8: 14.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:24:30.37 +18:32:18.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0465 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:04:32.89 +14:26:33.7: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:04:32.89 +14:26:33.7: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6904 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:19.03 +18:29:11.8: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:23:19.03 +18:29:11.8: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1681 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:26:04.85 +18:19:01.9: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:21:25.93 +18:33:16.3: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:21:25.93 +18:33:16.3: ref_mag=10.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6540 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:43.22 +18:29:43.1: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:43.22 +18:29:43.1: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:26:04.85 +18:19:01.9: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:23:43.22 +18:29:43.1: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8950 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:04.85 +18:19:01.9: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6750 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:48:54.33 +13:28:25.6: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:48:54.33 +13:28:25.6: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:54.33 +13:28:25.6: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5655 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:23:30.76 +18:14:56.8: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:23:30.76 +18:14:56.8: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:23:30.76 +18:14:56.8: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0855 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 17:22:16.50 +11:22:00.6: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 17:22:16.50 +11:22:00.6: 14.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:16.50 +11:22:00.6: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5206 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits at 16:25:26.48 +18:19:33.8: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_01-52-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0223.fits at 16:25:26.48 +18:19:33.8: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:26.48 +18:19:33.8: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5533 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out03952.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03478.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04058.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04163.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04301.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04498.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05209.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37584.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45179.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 40s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103295_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103295_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103298_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103298_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103299_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103299_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:16.58 +09:19:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103391_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103391_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:51.73 +09:59:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103459_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103459_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103587_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103587_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103608_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103608_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:06.79 +10:54:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103675_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103675_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103693_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103693_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103807_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103807_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103818_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103818_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103874_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103874_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:06.29 +10:27:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103913_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103913_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103919_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103919_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103939_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103939_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103996_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 103996_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104020_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104020_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104022_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104022_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104079_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104079_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104117_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104117_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:57.91 +09:49:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104124_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104124_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:16.18 +14:02:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104132_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104132_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104174_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104174_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104190_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104190_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104291_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104291_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104302_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104302_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104304_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104304_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104307_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104307_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104340_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104340_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104402_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104402_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:00.46 +14:30:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104462_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104462_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104472_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104472_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104494_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104494_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104503_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104503_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104569_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104569_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:28.27 +13:15:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104635_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104635_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104646_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104646_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:15.61 +14:31:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104678_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104678_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:07.77 +14:57:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104691_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104691_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104717_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104717_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104730_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104730_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104784_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104784_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104804_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104804_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104849_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104849_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104857_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104857_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104973_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 104973_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105128_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 105128_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32549_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 32549_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:53.99 +14:56:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45179_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 45179_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04058_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 04058_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05209_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 05209_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04498_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 04498_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53773_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 53773_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:38.02 +09:05:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37584_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 37584_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22567_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 22567_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:58.77 +16:09:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03952_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 03952_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:30.37 +18:32:18.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.317 1200787029632803968 246.12663083918 +18.53858057184 13.2322 12.2130 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.317#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03478_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 03478_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04301_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 04301_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05538_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 05538_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04163_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 04163_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46208_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 46208_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68562_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 68562_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:32.53 +10:05:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05891_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 05891_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78953_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 78953_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05383_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 05383_fd_Her-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_03-33-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
