NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-11-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    13.74    04:37:00.17 +56:26:54.9   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.92    04:36:59.72 +56:26:52.4   6792 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 13.3262  2461234.8262  13.83  04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6
150.51217   6.18476 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 0.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6:  16.07 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-11-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits
Field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-11-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-11-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 29166 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 29166 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits_preview.png'
Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits

renamed 'Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits_preview.png'
Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 572.9117 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 717.4508 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1500.8810 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 499.0374 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1497.8790 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 498.0895 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.61974 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-13T02:49:14.2586743' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-13T07:49:14.2586743' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61234.3258594675 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-13T07:49:24.1586593' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61234.3259740509 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 63.5277678857369 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 54.0001960171773 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 13.0166666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 32.3280555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 4.35804006570162 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 14 07' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20438 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20438 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 91.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 261.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/d_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits :) Spent 0.896673 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/d_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.8899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-13T02:49:51.3233063' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-13T07:49:51.3233063' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61234.3262884608 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-13T07:50:01.2234684' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61234.3264030442 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 63.5277677776466 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 54.0001960183698 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 13.0875 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 32.3902777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 4.33575042300977 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 14 07' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20438 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20438 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.8899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.8899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 91.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 261.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/d_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits :) Spent 0.880183 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/d_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits


fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461234.82597521 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Image size: 941.7'x624.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:13:43.168 +54:02:16.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 Second-epoch image center 04:13:43.168 +54:02:16.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0761 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Image size: 941.6'x624.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:13:43.168 +54:02:14.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 Second-epoch image center 04:13:43.168 +54:02:14.51 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0758 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:13:43.168 +54:02:16.64 Second-epoch second image center 04:13:43.168 +54:02:14.51 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00059 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00059 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ekKZ8gkQ9y Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PTdb1FYmCC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B5Yzfrh0Do Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.udwDsUcFak Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 19395 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3546 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3546 deg Loaded 11456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7296 out of 8078 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8078 out of 19395 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.971400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.971400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 19395 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3546 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3546 deg Loaded 11456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7296 out of 8078 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8078 out of 19395 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0380 to 78.9590 deg, Dec +47.7038 to +59.3646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0380 to 78.9590 deg, Dec 47.7038 to 59.3646 deg Loaded 11458 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7227 out of 8034 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8034 out of 17364 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 2.1 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 15.2 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 14.0 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits 14.0 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ekKZ8gkQ9y (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1810, bad_region=4453, passed=19395 Got 19395 stars (including 13447 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19395 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15168 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=266 n_q2=164 n_q3=322 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PTdb1FYmCC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1704, bad_region=4071, passed=17364 Got 17364 stars (including 11916 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13452 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13453 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13453 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=268 n_q2=165 n_q3=325 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.B5Yzfrh0Do (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, bad_region=1087, passed=6609 Got 6609 stars (including 5156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6609 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5594 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5595 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5595 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.803 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.819 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.823 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.819 n_q1=360 n_q2=142 n_q3=279 n_q4=179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.024 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.udwDsUcFak (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, bad_region=1083, passed=6645 Got 6645 stars (including 5206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6645 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5639 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5639 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5639 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.756 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.758 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.804 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.724 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.788 n_q1=361 n_q2=139 n_q3=281 n_q4=179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.108 ref2=Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.229 new1=fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits sigma_overall=0.803 worst_q_ratio=1.024 new2=fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.756 worst_q_ratio=1.063 reference average sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.1685 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits) flagged: sigma=0.803 (ref avg 0.386), ratio=1.024 (ref avg 1.1685), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2. Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6409 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out764204.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out764204.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 34.7733 (1.26429e+15), 7 match, 0 conflict, 25 distractors, 25 index. RA,Dec = (63.4325,54.0317), pixel scale 5.96941 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+---+---------+-+---+-+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out764204.solved to indicate this. Field: out764204.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (63.429620, 54.037709) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:13:43.109, +54:02:15.753). Field size: 15.7699 x 10.5593 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -2.27589 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits' -> 'fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits' WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 13 11:04 fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 13 11:04 out764204.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits (fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out764204.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out764204.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7333 degrees of RA,Dec (63.431,54.0386) log-odds ratio 34.7733 (1.26429e+15), 7 match, 0 conflict, 25 distractors, 25 index. RA,Dec = (63.4325,54.0317), pixel scale 5.96941 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+---+---------+-+---+-+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out764204.solved to indicate this. Field: out764204.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (63.429620, 54.037709) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:13:43.109, +54:02:15.753). Field size: 15.7699 x 10.5593 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -2.27589 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 13 11:04 fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 13 11:04 out764204.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 41976 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5278, 952.321] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 26.05 (2.0576e+11), 8 match, 0 conflict, 83 distractors, 13 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--------------------------+----+------------+--------------------------+----+-------+--+(best)--------- --> log-odds 26.05 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 137.943 (8.08787e+59), 19 match, 0 conflict, 130 distractors, 25 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-----+------------+-+-----+----+-----+------+---+----------------------+----+----+--+--+--------- --> log-odds 137.943 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 314.041 (2.43288e+136), 39 match, 0 conflict, 174 distractors, 51 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-----+----+-------+-+-----+----+--+--+---+--+---+-++-----------------+-+++--+----+--+--+----+---- --> log-odds 314.041 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 612.629 (1.15188e+266), 77 match, 0 conflict, 325 distractors, 97 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+----++----++-----++-++---++--+-+--+--+---+--+--++-++-------+---------+-++---+---++--+--+++--++--- --> log-odds 612.629 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1351.68 (inf), 163 match, 0 conflict, 263 distractors, 196 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-++-++++-++++--+-+++++--++++++-+--+-++--++-++--++++++-+++-+++-------++-++++++---++-+++-+++++++--+ --> log-odds 1351.68 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2509.71 (inf), 327 match, 0 conflict, 927 distractors, 388 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-++-++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+-+++++-+++-+++-++++++++++-++++---++-++-++++++---++-+++-+++++++-++ --> log-odds 2509.71 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4487.91 (inf), 621 match, 0 conflict, 1408 distractors, 727 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++-++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-+++++++++++++++--++++++-+++++++--++++++-+++++++-++ --> log-odds 4487.91 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 8200.1 (inf), 1239 match, 1 conflict, 2597 distractors, 1445 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++-++++++++++-+++++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-+++++++++++++++--++++++-+++++++--++++++-+++++++-++ --> log-odds 8200.1 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5278, 952.321] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 26.05 (2.0576e+11), 8 match, 0 conflict, 83 distractors, 13 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--------------------------+----+------------+--------------------------+----+-------+--+(best)--------- --> log-odds 26.05 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 137.943 (8.08787e+59), 19 match, 0 conflict, 130 distractors, 25 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-----+------------+-+-----+----+-----+------+---+----------------------+----+----+--+--+--------- --> log-odds 137.943 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 314.041 (2.43288e+136), 39 match, 0 conflict, 174 distractors, 51 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-----+----+-------+-+-----+----+--+--+---+--+---+-++-----------------+-+++--+----+--+--+----+---- --> log-odds 314.041 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 612.629 (1.15188e+266), 77 match, 0 conflict, 325 distractors, 97 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+----++----++-----++-++---++--+-+--+--+---+--+--++-++-------+---------+-++---+---++--+--+++--++--- --> log-odds 612.629 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1351.68 (inf), 163 match, 0 conflict, 263 distractors, 196 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-++-++++-++++--+-+++++--++++++-+--+-++--++-++--++++++-+++-+++-------++-++++++---++-+++-+++++++--+ --> log-odds 1351.68 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2509.71 (inf), 327 match, 0 conflict, 927 distractors, 388 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-++-++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+-+++++-+++-+++-++++++++++-++++---++-++-++++++---++-+++-+++++++-++ --> log-odds 2509.71 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4487.91 (inf), 621 match, 0 conflict, 1408 distractors, 727 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++-++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-+++++++++++++++--++++++-+++++++--++++++-+++++++-++ --> log-odds 4487.91 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 8200.1 (inf), 1239 match, 1 conflict, 2597 distractors, 1445 index. RA,Dec = (63.4283,54.0368), pixel scale 5.96692 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++-++++++++++-+++++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-+-+++++-+++++++++++++++--++++++-+++++++--++++++-+++++++-++ --> log-odds 8200.1 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (63.427595, 54.036971) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:13:42.623, +54:02:13.096). Field size: 15.767 x 10.5545 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -2.28334 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Generating wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Image size: 943.0'x625.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:13:42.947 +54:02:16.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6609 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky768422.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, bad_region=1087, passed=6609 Got 6609 stars (including 5156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6609 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.71" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.74" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5590 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.59" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5595 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.06" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1035) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.224 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.052 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.007 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.179 n_q1=360 n_q2=142 n_q3=279 n_q4=179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits): sigma 0.803->1.224, ratio 1.024->1.115; reverting to order 3 WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=1.224 -- 3.17x the reference average (0.386); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.71 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.68 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 14829_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 14829_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    8.97    04:16:33.26 +50:37:34.6   4973 1128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Image size: 941.7'x624.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:13:43.168 +54:02:16.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 Second-epoch image center 04:13:43.168 +54:02:16.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0761 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Image size: 941.6'x624.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:13:43.168 +54:02:14.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 Second-epoch image center 04:13:43.168 +54:02:14.51 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0758 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:13:43.168 +54:02:16.64 Second-epoch second image center 04:13:43.168 +54:02:14.51 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00059 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00059 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.haMJwVRScK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zTvonzUC2g Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.morWjILKPc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R88z0Ir0pJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 146998 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3589 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3589 deg Loaded 11494 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5947 out of 8185 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8185 out of 146998 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 146998 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3589 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3589 deg Loaded 11494 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5947 out of 8185 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8185 out of 146998 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (aperture=4.4) Read 140191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9805 to 78.9618 deg, Dec +47.6961 to +59.3674 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9805 to 78.9618 deg, Dec 47.6961 to 59.3674 deg Loaded 11490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 8203 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8203 out of 140191 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=4.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 112 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 1.9 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 1.9 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 1.9 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.haMJwVRScK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=16000, bad_region=23919, passed=146960 Got 146960 stars (including 109153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 146960 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124833 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124832 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124832 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=275 n_q2=169 n_q3=303 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.zTvonzUC2g (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14593, bad_region=23295, passed=140165 Got 140165 stars (including 104241 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140165 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118263 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118263 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118263 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=278 n_q2=167 n_q3=302 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.morWjILKPc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2982, bad_region=7560, passed=60146 Got 60146 stars (including 49787 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60146 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53555 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53555 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53556 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.816 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.800 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.812 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.909 n_q1=378 n_q2=147 n_q3=263 n_q4=178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.R88z0Ir0pJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=3050, bad_region=7676, passed=60053 Got 60053 stars (including 49563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60053 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.755 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.751 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.715 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.847 n_q1=377 n_q2=147 n_q3=266 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:56:28.10 +55:03:00.5: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:13:09.50 +51:56:08.6: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:59:08.28 +51:45:23.5: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:29:26.31 +53:27:28.0: 14.16 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:06:06.22 +53:34:18.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:56:28.10 +55:03:00.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:13:09.50 +51:56:08.6: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:29:26.31 +53:27:28.0: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:59:08.28 +51:45:23.5: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:28.10 +55:03:00.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6522 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:26.31 +53:27:28.0: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0553 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:09.50 +51:56:08.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4278 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:08.28 +51:45:23.5: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5540 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:04:30.05 +57:29:23.9: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:03:18.12 +56:42:19.5: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:06:06.22 +53:34:18.5: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:06.22 +53:34:18.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3310 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:03:18.12 +56:42:19.5: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:04:30.05 +57:29:23.9: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:12:45.16 +51:46:40.7: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:18.12 +56:42:19.5: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2914 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:30.05 +57:29:23.9: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5268 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:00:02.65 +51:34:13.8: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:49:59.16 +53:01:32.4: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:12:45.16 +51:46:40.7: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:45.16 +51:46:40.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8526 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:00:02.65 +51:34:13.8: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:02.65 +51:34:13.8: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7056 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:49:59.16 +53:01:32.4: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:59.16 +53:01:32.4: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9465 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:16:35.50 +52:58:45.6: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:16:35.50 +52:58:45.6: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:35.50 +52:58:45.6: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9017 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:52:58.88 +52:14:26.8: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:52:58.88 +52:14:26.8: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:58.88 +52:14:26.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6079 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177677.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165748_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165748_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.79    04:23:45.07 +53:49:42.9   5675 3052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:23:45.01 +53:49:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165749_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165749_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    14.12    04:29:26.26 +53:27:27.9   6184 2832   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    14.00    04:29:26.36 +53:27:28.1   6185 2832   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165751_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165751_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    14.02    03:54:34.91 +56:45:07.7   3276 4950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165756_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165756_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.89    03:50:51.62 +55:54:51.7   2907 4482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165762_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165762_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.83    04:11:54.61 +54:29:30.5   4642 3476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165767_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165767_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.81    03:46:37.78 +51:00:42.8   2143 1585   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165771_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165771_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.61    04:02:36.60 +49:41:11.4   3593 0627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165774_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165774_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    13.65    03:56:27.94 +55:03:00.1   3327 3909   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.65    03:56:28.27 +55:03:00.9   3327 3909   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165776_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165776_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    13.47    04:13:09.35 +51:56:09.1   4683 1930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.39    04:13:09.65 +51:56:08.2   4684 1930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165777_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165777_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    13.55    03:59:08.48 +51:45:25.5   3372 1905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.56    03:59:08.08 +51:45:21.4   3372 1905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165779_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165779_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.46    04:04:01.95 +53:24:05.2   3904 2860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165781_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165781_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.60    03:49:31.37 +52:30:16.4   2533 2448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165782_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165782_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.12    04:00:45.07 +49:41:54.7   3412 0649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:00:45.05 +49:41:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165783_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165783_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    13.43    04:06:05.87 +53:34:19.4   4096 2950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.27    04:06:06.56 +53:34:17.6   4097 2950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165785_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165785_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    13.52    04:04:30.10 +57:29:23.0   4128 5321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.53    04:04:30.00 +57:29:24.8   4128 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165789_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165789_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    13.35    04:03:18.06 +56:42:21.5   3994 4854   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.25    04:03:18.17 +56:42:17.4   3994 4854   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165792_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165792_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.23    04:11:39.33 +53:09:02.1   4580 2669   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165793_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165793_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.21    04:14:57.42 +53:45:30.4   4892 3023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165801_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165801_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    12.74    04:12:45.34 +51:46:40.9   4641 1837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.07    04:12:44.97 +51:46:40.6   4641 1837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165803_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165803_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    12.66    04:00:02.59 +51:34:13.3   3446 1786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.76    04:00:02.71 +51:34:14.3   3446 1786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165804_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165804_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.91    03:58:55.26 +50:10:17.5   3261 0950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165805_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165805_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.67    03:47:44.20 +50:36:21.4   2215 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165809_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165809_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    11.92    03:49:59.22 +53:01:31.5   2615 2756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    11.97    03:49:59.11 +53:01:33.2   2615 2757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 165810_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 165810_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    11.12    03:56:47.85 +52:20:12.6   3189 2275   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 166590_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 166590_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    10.72    03:57:37.12 +53:25:36.0   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 166698_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 166698_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    10.58    04:37:00.28 +50:21:29.0   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 166856_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 166856_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    10.78    04:39:08.39 +51:16:31.5   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 167079_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 167079_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    11.25    04:15:06.70 +56:42:22.2   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 168410_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 168410_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    11.90    04:16:35.50 +52:58:45.6   5022 2549   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    11.90    04:16:35.49 +52:58:45.6   5022 2549   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 169082_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 169082_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.23    04:33:29.78 +55:49:29.3   6510 4270   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:33:29.84 +55:49:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 169545_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 169545_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.25    04:20:05.90 +50:53:20.5   5316 1280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 170020_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 170020_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.36    04:39:16.65 +57:36:42.6   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 170114_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 170114_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.49    03:53:53.68 +49:48:27.6   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 170226_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 170226_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.70    03:49:51.09 +51:28:58.1   2485 1830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 170438_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 170438_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.71    03:56:14.18 +57:39:58.1   3469 5487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 170457_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 170457_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.51    04:22:29.30 +51:37:11.8   5548 1720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:22:29.21 +51:37:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 170694_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 170694_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.72    03:44:42.70 +49:55:28.7   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 170912_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 170912_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.59    04:26:53.13 +51:58:58.3   5959 1939   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 171094_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 171094_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.90    04:21:30.43 +53:41:35.7   5475 2972   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:21:30.48 +53:41:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 171243_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 171243_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.67    04:03:59.35 +49:50:09.3   3734 0708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 171854_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 171854_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.82    04:19:48.31 +57:03:19.7   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 171942_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 171942_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.93    03:47:02.00 +51:42:10.0   2239 1996   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172055_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172055_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.89    04:37:53.44 +53:35:50.7   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172056_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172056_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.19    03:44:44.59 +54:08:37.8   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172101_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172101_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.03    04:30:19.11 +57:36:26.1   6223 5341   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:30:18.99 +57:36:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172174_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172174_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.04    04:03:18.14 +55:02:12.5   3915 3849   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172331_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172331_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.12    03:46:19.13 +54:48:58.8   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172504_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172504_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.19    04:04:29.89 +52:39:29.7   3912 2409   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172536_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172536_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.85    04:15:09.65 +50:40:21.4   4841 1160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:15:09.60 +50:40:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172593_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172593_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.05    03:47:49.01 +51:45:02.6   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172857_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172857_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.26    03:51:28.50 +49:46:36.1   2512 0783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 172989_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 172989_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.15    03:47:45.27 +51:10:53.7   2264 1673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 03:47:45.26 +51:10:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173048_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173048_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.21    04:06:20.66 +53:04:48.0   4098 2652   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173211_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173211_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.74    04:40:18.09 +51:05:31.5   7235 1441   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:40:18.13 +51:05:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173227_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173227_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.01    04:08:12.33 +51:13:20.3   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173300_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173300_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.03    04:37:47.33 +50:39:39.5   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173315_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173315_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.14    04:15:20.57 +53:40:52.1   4925 2976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173371_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173371_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.20    04:01:40.45 +53:50:12.5   3714 3138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173560_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173560_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.13    04:15:12.07 +53:43:56.9   4913 3007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173567_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173567_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.06    04:20:48.59 +50:15:31.8   5377 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173605_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173605_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.01    04:22:11.41 +51:01:13.6   5516 1358   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:22:11.53 +51:01:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173717_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173717_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.27    04:10:38.64 +57:50:51.4   4637 5507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:10:38.48 +57:50:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173731_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173731_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.37    03:53:45.62 +58:00:10.6   3292 5713   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 03:53:45.57 +58:00:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173821_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173821_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.00    04:15:27.60 +51:12:51.7   4881 1487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:15:27.72 +51:12:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173907_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173907_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.39    03:47:40.73 +54:47:04.2   2548 3838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 173925_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 173925_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.20    04:39:18.73 +51:37:53.8   7125 1762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174009_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174009_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.29    03:58:13.98 +58:02:40.3   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174114_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174114_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.98    03:46:56.50 +49:51:14.7   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174168_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174168_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.40    03:49:32.49 +52:38:02.0   2545 2526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 03:49:32.51 +52:38:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174355_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174355_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.24    04:41:18.03 +57:54:08.3   7105 5560   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174392_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174392_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.44    03:45:59.93 +50:25:02.9   2033 1234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 03:45:59.90 +50:25:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174413_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174413_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.34    03:59:40.04 +50:07:20.2   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174499_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174499_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.42    04:04:44.89 +55:44:11.4   4071 4261   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:04:44.88 +55:44:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174503_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174503_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.34    04:35:49.86 +57:16:33.0   6677 5156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174511_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174511_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.29    04:08:25.92 +57:58:21.9   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174607_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174607_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.40    03:49:37.91 +51:03:54.3   2432 1581   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174668_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174668_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.01    04:40:17.98 +53:28:29.2   7161 2879   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:40:18.00 +53:28:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174670_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174670_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.44    04:02:15.93 +52:53:30.4   3720 2565   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174745_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174745_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.51    04:01:31.87 +57:26:46.8   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174865_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174865_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.39    04:31:50.62 +53:45:39.6   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174877_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174877_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.47    04:21:15.62 +56:43:05.4   5480 4797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 174921_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 174921_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.29    04:15:28.20 +51:13:44.4   4883 1496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 175206_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 175206_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.33    04:33:27.13 +52:49:21.1   6556 2458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:33:27.19 +52:49:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 175284_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 175284_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.36    03:58:02.51 +49:44:29.1   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 175539_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 175539_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.65    03:59:23.54 +51:29:20.5   3381 1742   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 175780_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 175780_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.09    04:32:57.78 +50:08:53.3   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 175975_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 175975_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.70    04:03:47.05 +57:34:53.0   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 176089_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 176089_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.43    04:30:42.69 +55:02:22.5   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 176184_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 176184_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.57    04:32:52.21 +54:35:00.7   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 176467_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 176467_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.62    04:06:04.21 +53:08:18.4   4076 2689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 176483_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 176483_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.72    04:04:45.93 +55:43:51.9   4072 4258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:04:45.69 +55:43:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 176545_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 176545_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 13.32598    2461234.82598    13.65    03:52:58.81 +52:14:28.3   2832 2253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-14_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.57    03:52:58.95 +52:14:25.2   2832 2253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 176764_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 176764_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.60    04:29:40.32 +53:45:58.5   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 177072_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 177072_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.46    04:17:10.13 +53:20:35.6   5081 2767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 177099_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 177099_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.73    04:12:52.60 +58:07:19.8   4824 5666   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:12:52.68 +58:07:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 177490_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 177490_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.48    04:03:40.37 +53:22:10.0   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 177672_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 177672_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.70    04:17:29.25 +50:06:21.7   5053 0811   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:17:29.25 +50:06:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 177677_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 Preparing report for the candidate 177677_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 177682_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 177682_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.90    03:48:21.23 +51:46:29.2   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 177686_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 177686_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.48    04:43:41.95 +56:24:53.9   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 177951_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 177951_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.65    04:30:37.88 +52:17:32.7   6304 2131   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 178482_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 178482_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.81    04:11:37.45 +56:41:49.7   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 178518_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 178518_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.79    04:01:31.34 +54:26:48.3   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 178613_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 178613_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.81    04:02:57.05 +51:32:12.8   3717 1744   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:02:57.04 +51:32:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 179187_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 179187_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    14.07    04:29:25.82 +57:56:37.5   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121702_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 121702_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    9.08    04:16:33.26 +50:37:34.6   4973 1128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20677_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 20677_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.45    04:36:33.63 +57:24:03.2   6734 5234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:36:33.66 +57:24:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 158471_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 158471_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.22    04:35:47.09 +52:49:59.5   6769 2472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:35:47.15 +52:49:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 158382_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 158382_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.38    04:31:04.92 +50:10:27.7   6369 0851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 04:31:04.84 +50:10:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 37501_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 37501_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    12.76    04:21:09.69 +56:28:52.2   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83710_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 83710_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    13.01    04:09:22.06 +53:06:24.9   4372 2653   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 44543_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 44543_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 13.32640    2461234.82640    11.90    04:24:46.60 +55:55:41.0   5770 4319   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-13_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_025204_TTUQ2b1x1_3870085_vTzkxbiV/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_02-49-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 24s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6 ########### Completed Cam-11-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6 ################################################################################### 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 04:36:59.95 +56:26:53.6 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461234.82597521 -observatory V36 07:24:13.83 +17:06:56.3 Mercury (5.6mag) 10:24:01.01 +11:21:43.4 Venus (-4.1mag) 04:32:59.62 +21:46:41.2 Mars (1.3mag) 08:19:22.89 +20:02:53.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:08.94 +03:21:28.0 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:07:47.68 +20:46:34.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:17:00.17 +00:20:22.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:30:38.42 -23:19:19.3 Pluto (14.4mag) 06:25:46.56 +26:42:43.4 Moon (-8.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 13 11:02 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461234.82597521: 08:19:18.86 +20:03:09.6 Io (6.1mag) 08:19:16.49 +20:03:18.7 Europa (6.3mag) 08:19:12.91 +20:03:28.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:19:26.62 +20:02:34.9 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:17:46.26 +19:48:18.8 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:19:27.41 +20:02:36.3 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:17:07.05 +19:52:07.2 Elara (17.6mag) 08:23:00.55 +19:55:27.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:24:10.51 +20:08:23.9 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:11.21 +03:20:57.1 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:11.66 +03:21:34.3 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:55:35.31 +03:20:03.6 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:05.20 +03:21:57.7 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:05.69 +03:18:15.7 Phoebe (16.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 13 11:02 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461234.82597521: 17:50:13.15 -32:20:09.3 JWST 17:03:45.28 +42:52:19.6 Chandra 09:47:39.29 -55:20:39.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 13 11:02 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461234.82597521 -observatory V36 02:40:28.88 +14:46:47.2 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:15:40.73 -34:26:30.4 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:28:39.06 -68:11:18.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:01:50.18 +32:29:51.9 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:04:10.57 +13:47:17.6 15.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:57:43.39 +32:16:34.6 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:15:47.24 +26:53:57.2 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:58:06.70 +29:38:51.6 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:11:39.51 +05:03:17.1 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:05:25.16 +21:10:35.2 18.0mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:11:18.82 -11:27:25.8 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:45:36.74 +67:35:39.1 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:25:06.72 -10:23:19.3 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:05:49.64 +65:52:10.3 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:36:42.02 +30:09:14.9 14.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:14:55.14 +15:24:12.4 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:37:30.14 +39:57:45.4 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:44:27.68 +46:26:43.6 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:52:26.45 -13:39:49.9 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:37:01.72 +28:34:25.6 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:16:24.42 -13:09:24.1 16.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:59:33.60 +22:18:28.2 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:45:38.08 +03:48:31.3 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:43:40.08 +79:09:53.5 17.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:49:23.29 +45:22:03.0 16.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:27:25.41 +05:03:54.6 17.0mag A/2026 E1 21:23:41.34 -16:09:33.0 7.2mag 10P/Tempel 11:14:51.67 -02:00:57.2 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:04:27.15 +29:52:31.8 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:14:17.31 +13:03:45.0 17.0mag 63P/Wild 00:49:37.14 -05:03:45.4 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:34:35.49 +20:19:40.0 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:27:06.84 +11:00:57.4 16.3mag 88P/Howell 06:44:22.04 +30:21:07.4 15.7mag 93P/Lovas 04:30:40.38 +31:14:11.2 16.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:15:57.94 +30:22:04.5 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:53:41.26 -00:01:20.9 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos 04:56:30.29 +20:53:45.1 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:41:51.70 +19:41:15.4 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 00:02:19.28 +03:02:53.5 17.9mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 07:24:26.66 +16:22:23.4 15.9mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:18:04.49 -20:51:40.2 15.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 05:43:47.10 +34:34:32.2 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:56:26.24 +16:57:39.5 14.5mag 169P/NEAT 01:48:06.63 +07:55:36.4 17.7mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:37.56 -08:30:24.3 17.1mag 235P/LINEAR 08:51:32.89 +33:01:22.5 17.9mag 240P/NEAT 20:40:49.75 -50:12:34.9 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:07:38.75 +13:29:11.8 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 05:46:15.61 +37:04:25.3 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:29.44 +05:47:24.0 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:37:16.66 +19:33:19.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:56:26.06 +38:58:07.4 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.6K Jul 13 11:02 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 13 11:02 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 13 11:02 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:16:24.213 +13:24:43.98 AT 2026tpq 2026-07-10.92 19.9 12:46:18.966 +00:29:18.31 AT 2026tpp 2026-02-27.64 22.03 11:11:05.252 -20:09:49.14 AT 2026tpo 2026-04-19.33 21.35 08:27:14.950 +07:35:58.82 AT 2026tpn 2026-03-09.32 21.47 14:00:01.608 -17:41:28.55 AT 2026tpm 2026-06-07.29 21.68 12:16:26.621 +11:00:26.08 AT 2026tpl 2026-02-16.62 21.16 15:25:29.604 -15:53:31.26 AT 2026tpk 2026-06-13.37 20.93 13:24:42.561 -06:22:23.48 AT 2026tpj 2026-01-20.63 20.87 15:50:59.060 +06:20:09.76 AT 2026tpi 2026-06-15.46 21.35 10:47:25.526 -03:49:23.63 AT 2026tph 2026-01-16.49 21.64 13:02:15.361 +45:51:35.20 AT 2026tpg 2026-01-08.63 20.9 10:13:04.585 -02:08:41.00 AT 2026tpf 2026-04-21.29 20.91 12:56:24.797 +39:54:51.89 AT 2026tpe 2026-02-12.65 22.32 12:17:06.882 -15:52:23.32 AT 2026tpd 2026-05-17.30 21.49 09:57:03.429 +14:12:08.48 AT 2026tpc 2026-04-06.25 21.31 12:58:16.246 -16:08:31.20 AT 2026tpb 2026-02-26.58 21.35 08:11:52.444 +10:55:48.58 AT 2026tpa 2026-01-28.35 21.11 21:33:46.265 +27:03:56.69 AT 2026toz 2026-06-22.49 21.16 15:31:46.821 +19:25:51.54 AT 2026toy 2026-04-21.55 21.27 10:44:05.178 +12:45:21.54 AT 2026tox 2026-01-16.61 21.73 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 13 11:02 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C