This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 11.01 04:25:50.76 +25:03:23.2
172.46525 -16.57657 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 149640066504937728 | 04:25:52.00 +25:03:16.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K7 1968AbaOB..38...93M [M69] +24 252
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:25:50.76 +25:03:23.2: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:25:50.76 +25:03:23.2: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 04 25 50.76 +25 03 23.2 11.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 149640066504937728,2461233.8837,11.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 149640066504937728 20260712.3837 11.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 11.26 04:27:27.50 +24:56:57.3
172.80139 -16.37399 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 149442498008026112 | 04:27:29.17 +24:56:46.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K0III 1968AbaOB..38...93M [M69] +24 262
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:27.50 +24:56:57.3: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:27.50 +24:56:57.3: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 04 27 27.50 +24 56 57.3 11.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 149442498008026112,2461233.8837,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 149442498008026112 20260712.3837 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 11.28 04:26:40.37 +25:00:40.3
172.63018 -16.46646 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 149452805929753216 | 04:26:41.86 +25:00:31.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:40.37 +25:00:40.3: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:40.37 +25:00:40.3: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 04 26 40.37 +25 00 40.3 11.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 149452805929753216,2461233.8837,11.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 149452805929753216 20260712.3837 11.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 11.37 04:29:18.62 +25:41:49.9
172.50437 -15.56589 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 151001979157524608 | 04:29:17.36 +25:42:04.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: A2 1954ArA.....1..425A BD+25 717
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:18.62 +25:41:49.9: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:18.62 +25:41:49.9: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 04 29 18.62 +25 41 49.9 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 151001979157524608,2461233.8837,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 151001979157524608 20260712.3837 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 12.68 03:31:21.37 +31:41:44.4
158.48577 -19.91839 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.980 Anacostia -0 -0 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:31:21.37 +31:41:44.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:31:21.37 +31:41:44.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 03 31 21.37 +31 41 44.4 12.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.8837,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.3837 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 11.88 04:34:12.26 +30:22:54.5
169.61762 -11.66172 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra -0 0 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:12.26 +30:22:54.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:12.26 +30:22:54.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 04 34 12.26 +30 22 54.5 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.8837,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.3837 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 12.05 04:29:16.98 +25:40:46.3
172.51394 -15.58217 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 151000815221252480 | 04:29:15.67 +25:41:00.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F0 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:16.98 +25:40:46.3: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:16.98 +25:40:46.3: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 04 29 16.98 +25 40 46.3 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 151000815221252480,2461233.8837,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 151000815221252480 20260712.3837 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 12.20 04:29:26.15 +25:30:31.9
172.67082 -15.66872 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 150994351294786048 | 04:29:24.83 +25:30:42.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:26.15 +25:30:31.9: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:26.15 +25:30:31.9: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 04 29 26.15 +25 30 31.9 12.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 150994351294786048,2461233.8837,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 150994351294786048 20260712.3837 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 12.39 04:24:26.15 +25:05:26.7
172.21659 -16.79199 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 149632228186396288 | 04:24:27.39 +25:05:20.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:26.15 +25:05:26.7: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:26.15 +25:05:26.7: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 04 24 26.15 +25 05 26.7 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 149632228186396288,2461233.8837,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 149632228186396288 20260712.3837 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3837 2461233.8837 12.40 04:11:41.97 +28:41:26.8
167.45059 -16.39415 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 5.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J041141.85+284128.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.900 V 14.240 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:41.97 +28:41:26.8: 13.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:41.97 +28:41:26.8: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.3837* 04 11 41.97 +28 41 26.8 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041141.85+284128.2,2461233.8837,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041141.85+284128.2 20260712.3837 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461233.88405547 12.07.2026 09:12:52.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12635
Objects passed selection criteria: 12567
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8333
Average stars matched: 8094 (97.1319 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 121128 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 06:11:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461233.88405547 12.07.2026 09:12:52.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 147
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90297
Objects passed selection criteria: 90046
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61323.2
Average stars matched: 58965 (96.1544 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1862764 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 06:15:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461233.88339093
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Image size: 946.8'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:07.222 +29:59:44.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 04:00:07.222 +29:59:44.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Image size: 946.5'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:07.216 +30:00:18.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 04:00:07.216 +30:00:18.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:07.222 +29:59:44.04
Second-epoch second image center 04:00:07.216 +30:00:18.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00958 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nt6fliQS4k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.61CnLwLO2a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0yhekIq1Gu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AHJG13Rgna
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3110 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3110 deg
Loaded 7268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5559 out of 6072 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6072 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Nt6fliQS4k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=288 n_q2=226 n_q3=157 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.61CnLwLO2a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=285 n_q2=225 n_q3=160 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0yhekIq1Gu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=161, bad_region=0, passed=3262
Got 3262 stars (including 3097 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3262 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 946.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 946.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013150 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010520 (37.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.801 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.644 n_q1=329 n_q2=107 n_q3=304 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.372
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AHJG13Rgna (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=172, bad_region=0, passed=3332
Got 3332 stars (including 3158 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 946.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 946.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013146 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010517 (37.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.939 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=324 n_q2=110 n_q3=300 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.652
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.141
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits sigma_overall=0.584 worst_q_ratio=1.372
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.652
reference average sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.1875
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:41.93 +27:32:08.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:52.96 +24:26:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:31:46.32 +26:24:29.2: 10.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:06.71 +25:27:03.0: 10.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:37:38.52 +32:37:25.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:31:48.94 +25:53:10.7: 9.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:20.43 +25:11:19.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:52.96 +24:26:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:52.96 +24:26:49.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:06.71 +25:27:03.0: 10.04 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:06.71 +25:27:03.0: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1879 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:41.93 +27:32:08.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:41.93 +27:32:08.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:31:48.94 +25:53:10.7: 9.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:37:38.52 +32:37:25.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:38.52 +32:37:25.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:48.94 +25:53:10.7: ref_mag=9.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4076 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:31:46.32 +26:24:29.2: 10.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.08 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:46.32 +26:24:29.2: ref_mag=10.08 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1573 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:20.43 +25:11:19.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:20.43 +25:11:19.2: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20889_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20889_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20897_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20897_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:15.17 +25:01:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:33.45 +25:03:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20911_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20911_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.31 +33:02:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20936_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20936_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20938_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20938_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09740_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 09740_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:28.18 +27:40:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05539_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 05539_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:10.26 +31:21:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05084_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 05084_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:07.99 +31:52:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09743_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 09743_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:20.79 +27:21:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Image size: 946.8'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:07.222 +29:59:44.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 04:00:07.222 +29:59:44.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Image size: 946.5'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:07.216 +30:00:18.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 04:00:07.216 +30:00:18.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:07.222 +29:59:44.04
Second-epoch second image center 04:00:07.216 +30:00:18.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00958 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fbiP74KzIw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XEyJWGvkLO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QG01O9CAhf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qXJslKd2Dt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3115 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3115 deg
Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4807 out of 6112 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6112 out of 98825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 132 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fbiP74KzIw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158
Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=274 n_q2=232 n_q3=164 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XEyJWGvkLO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800
Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=274 n_q2=233 n_q3=164 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QG01O9CAhf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=691, bad_region=4, passed=24217
Got 24217 stars (including 23489 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 946.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 946.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013150 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010520 (37.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.791 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=327 n_q2=105 n_q3=302 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.394
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qXJslKd2Dt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=797, bad_region=7, passed=24646
Got 24646 stars (including 23806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 946.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 946.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013146 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010517 (37.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.959 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=327 n_q2=109 n_q3=298 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.734
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-11-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041949_TTUQ1b1x1_4130945_lXIYKsa8/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:59.98 +25:43:03.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:42.63 +25:09:41.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:58.93 +27:35:58.8: 9.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:46.56 +25:24:53.9: 9.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:50.66 +29:05:02.5: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:50.04 +27:11:51.7: 9.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:59.98 +25:43:03.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:59.98 +25:43:03.2: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:03.81 +24:46:32.2: 9.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:58.93 +27:35:58.8: 9.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:42.63 +25:09:41.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:42.63 +25:09:41.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:46.56 +25:24:53.9: 9.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:50.66 +29:05:02.5: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:50.04 +27:11:51.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:50.04 +27:11:51.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:58.93 +27:35:58.8: ref_mag=9.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7333 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:41.93 +27:32:08.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:46.56 +25:24:53.9: ref_mag=9.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6469 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:13.01 +24:47:41.2: 9.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:50.66 +29:05:02.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8341 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:53.70 +28:03:51.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:03.81 +24:46:32.2: 9.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.75 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:03.81 +24:46:32.2: ref_mag=9.75 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8886 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:41.93 +27:32:08.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:41.93 +27:32:08.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:13.01 +24:47:41.2: 9.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:53.70 +28:03:51.4: 9.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:53.70 +28:03:51.4: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:13.01 +24:47:41.2: ref_mag=9.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9294 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:37:38.47 +32:37:25.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:03.45 +24:38:39.7: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:49.14 +27:44:20.9: 9.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:31:46.32 +26:24:29.2: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:49.14 +27:44:20.9: 9.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:03.45 +24:38:39.7: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:37:38.47 +32:37:25.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:38.47 +32:37:25.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:49.14 +27:44:20.9: ref_mag=9.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3745 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:03.45 +24:38:39.7: ref_mag=10.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4360 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:31:46.32 +26:24:29.2: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:55.58 +28:12:45.6: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:46.32 +26:24:29.2: ref_mag=10.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1518 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.40 +25:16:25.2: 11.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:25:50.76 +25:03:23.2: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:55.58 +28:12:45.6: 10.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:55.58 +28:12:45.6: ref_mag=10.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5708 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.40 +25:16:25.2: 11.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:33:58.59 +27:07:28.9: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.40 +25:16:25.2: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2756 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:38:21.94 +34:00:29.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:25:50.76 +25:03:23.2: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:25:50.76 +25:03:23.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0036 delta=1.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:25.13 +27:22:03.3: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:27.51 +27:19:50.8: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:33:58.59 +27:07:28.9: 10.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:38:21.94 +34:00:29.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:21.94 +34:00:29.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:40:07.65 +26:36:33.6: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:58.59 +27:07:28.9: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9244 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:25.13 +27:22:03.3: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:27.51 +27:19:50.8: 10.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.79 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:25.13 +27:22:03.3: ref_mag=10.79 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0121 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:27.51 +27:19:50.8: ref_mag=10.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0284 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:40:07.65 +26:36:33.6: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:07.65 +26:36:33.6: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9243 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:27.50 +24:56:57.3: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:40.37 +25:00:40.3: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:18.62 +25:41:49.9: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:31:21.37 +31:41:44.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:40.37 +25:00:40.3: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:27.50 +24:56:57.3: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:26:40.37 +25:00:40.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2735 delta=2.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:27:27.50 +24:56:57.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.2584 delta=2.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:37:35.84 +28:26:36.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:18.62 +25:41:49.9: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:29:18.62 +25:41:49.9: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.3641 delta=2.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:21.86 +26:57:04.6: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:31:21.37 +31:41:44.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:35:02.66 +28:07:52.1: 11.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:04.99 +24:45:15.1: 11.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:37:35.84 +28:26:36.5: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:35.84 +28:26:36.5: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3745 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:21.86 +26:57:04.6: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:21.86 +26:57:04.6: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6142 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:35:02.66 +28:07:52.1: 11.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:02.66 +28:07:52.1: ref_mag=11.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4586 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:04.99 +24:45:15.1: 11.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:04.99 +24:45:15.1: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5568 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:57.52 +27:10:42.9: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:57.52 +27:10:42.9: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:57.52 +27:10:42.9: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6587 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:27.07 +24:35:38.9: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:31:14.91 +25:59:15.2: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:33.17 +28:12:45.4: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:27.07 +24:35:38.9: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:27.07 +24:35:38.9: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5343 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:33.17 +28:12:45.4: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:31:14.91 +25:59:15.2: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:33.17 +28:12:45.4: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7857 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:12.26 +30:22:54.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:14.91 +25:59:15.2: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7063 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:29.89 +25:53:46.2: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:12.26 +30:22:54.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:29.89 +25:53:46.2: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:29.89 +25:53:46.2: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7492 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:06.67 +25:45:19.4: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:08:35.72 +33:42:37.8: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:17.25 +25:08:18.6: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:01:55.84 +31:58:47.5: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:06.67 +25:45:19.4: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:06.67 +25:45:19.4: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7683 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:08:35.72 +33:42:37.8: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:35.72 +33:42:37.8: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5364 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:01:55.84 +31:58:47.5: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:17.25 +25:08:18.6: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:55.84 +31:58:47.5: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6315 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:17.25 +25:08:18.6: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8130 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:40.70 +24:40:31.3: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:40.70 +24:40:31.3: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:40.70 +24:40:31.3: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9259 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:53.00 +26:04:13.9: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:16.98 +25:40:46.3: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:53.00 +26:04:13.9: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:53.00 +26:04:13.9: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9234 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:16.98 +25:40:46.3: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:29:16.98 +25:40:46.3: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.0499 delta=2.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:56.43 +25:44:25.7: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:43.79 +26:01:27.8: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:56.43 +25:44:25.7: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:56.43 +25:44:25.7: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8032 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:43.79 +26:01:27.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:43.79 +26:01:27.8: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0706 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:29.23 +30:51:26.3: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:29.23 +30:51:26.3: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:29.23 +30:51:26.3: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5960 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:26.15 +25:30:31.9: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:47.21 +24:30:19.7: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:47.21 +24:30:19.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:26.15 +25:30:31.9: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:29:26.15 +25:30:31.9: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.1909 delta=2.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:47.21 +24:30:19.7: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1603 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:08.63 +28:05:48.8: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:23.95 +32:10:59.9: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:08.63 +28:05:48.8: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:08.63 +28:05:48.8: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1257 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:23.95 +32:10:59.9: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:23.95 +32:10:59.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1698 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:53.05 +32:10:15.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:26.15 +25:05:26.7: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:53.05 +32:10:15.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:53.05 +32:10:15.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0270 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:26.15 +25:05:26.7: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:24:26.15 +25:05:26.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3969 delta=1.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:31:14.95 +26:29:25.1: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:37:41.11 +32:35:47.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:31:14.95 +26:29:25.1: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:14.95 +26:29:25.1: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3472 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:37:41.11 +32:35:47.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:41.11 +32:35:47.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:31.63 +24:37:54.6: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:38.77 +29:48:35.1: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:31.63 +24:37:54.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:31.63 +24:37:54.6: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5582 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:38.77 +29:48:35.1: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.77 +29:48:35.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1482 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:41.97 +28:41:26.8: 13.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:41.97 +28:41:26.8: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:11:41.97 +28:41:26.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3996 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117729.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117782.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117786.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117796.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117798.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117887.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118018.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118073.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90929.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 27s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117598_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117598_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117614_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117614_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:54.41 +25:34:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117622_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117622_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117625_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117625_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:15.17 +25:01:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117630_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117630_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117637_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117637_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:33.59 +25:03:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117638_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117638_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:30.77 +26:40:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117640_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117640_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117645_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117645_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117647_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117647_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117651_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117651_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117655_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117655_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117656_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117656_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117676_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117676_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117678_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117678_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.39 +25:32:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117684_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117684_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117688_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117688_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117705_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117705_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:29.41 +26:09:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117706_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117706_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117708_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117708_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117719_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117719_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:09.19 +26:11:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117720_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117720_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.52 +25:00:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117729_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 117729_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117730_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117730_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:39.77 +26:13:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117733_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117733_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117734_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117734_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117735_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117735_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:37.09 +25:42:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:33.15 +26:01:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117738_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117738_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117748_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117748_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117750_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117750_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117758_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117758_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:18.84 +25:31:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117761_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117761_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:08.99 +26:41:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117766_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117766_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.08 +33:34:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117776_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117776_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:05.56 +26:24:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117778_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117778_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:48.37 +27:33:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117781_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117781_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:30.24 +26:28:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117782_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 117782_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117786_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 117786_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117787_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117787_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.22 +31:27:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117789_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117789_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:02.77 +26:30:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 117796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117798_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 117798_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117812_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117812_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:56.51 +25:48:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117813_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117813_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:18.21 +31:52:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117814_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117814_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:30.92 +25:25:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117819_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117819_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117822_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117822_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117829_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117829_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:11.46 +25:20:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117835_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117835_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117840_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117840_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117847_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117847_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:02.64 +25:42:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117848_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117848_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117853_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117853_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:26.78 +33:33:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117856_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117856_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117870_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117870_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:17.58 +26:09:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117873_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117873_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117878_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117878_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117884_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117884_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:05.29 +31:58:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117887_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 117887_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117888_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117888_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117889_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117889_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:42.09 +26:08:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117895_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117895_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:26.85 +35:06:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:44.48 +26:33:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117904_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117904_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117905_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117905_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:27.77 +26:39:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117909_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117909_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117921_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117921_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117923_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117923_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117926_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117926_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:05.46 +26:39:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117938_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117938_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:24.75 +27:22:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:04.85 +26:06:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117954_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117954_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117980_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117980_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:42.11 +26:32:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117982_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 117982_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117989_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117989_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117991_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117991_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117996_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117996_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:48.10 +26:24:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117998_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 117998_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:45.43 +34:21:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118001_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118001_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:41.55 +25:09:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118002_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118002_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118006_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118006_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:21.62 +33:59:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118014_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118014_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:26.43 +26:05:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118015_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118015_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:53.12 +26:01:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118018_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 118018_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118022_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118022_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118024_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118024_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118031_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118031_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118033_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118033_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:48.26 +25:40:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118045_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118045_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.11 +34:06:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118048_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118048_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118073_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 118073_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118083_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118083_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:00.86 +34:01:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118107_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118107_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118111_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118111_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118131_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118131_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:56.28 +25:30:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118133_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118133_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118137_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118137_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:24.91 +32:27:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118141_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 118141_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:01.29 +28:53:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 39689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:10.25 +31:21:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:37.96 +34:15:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90929_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 90929_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55900_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 55900_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:33.84 +29:58:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49649_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 49649_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:10.39 +30:39:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.36 +29:42:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 87946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:28.20 +27:40:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34592_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 34592_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:53.71 +32:11:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 51908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:52.65 +30:25:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50690_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 50690_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:59.95 +30:22:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.31 +33:48:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110109_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 110109_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.33 +33:02:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:05.12 +25:42:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:17.42 +28:04:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 82737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:42.30 +26:47:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:17.07 +28:10:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62930_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 62930_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:00.09 +29:00:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37002_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 37002_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:07.98 +31:52:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87712_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 87712_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:36.31 +27:35:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32803_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 32803_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:19.34 +32:17:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75576_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 75576_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.70 +26:28:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17104_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 17104_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:58.87 +33:35:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 34632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:09.83 +31:57:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70275_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 70275_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:19.07 +25:34:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09060_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 09060_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:29.16 +34:07:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 86796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:20.80 +27:21:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39135_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 39135_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.36 +31:26:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11264_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 11264_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:37.49 +33:57:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04036_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 04036_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_04-12-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
