This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3284 2461233.8284 8.22 05:23:44.13 +60:43:15.0
150.75779 13.60356 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" DX Cam
Type: LB:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.900 Hp 9.180 Hp M2
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:23:44.13 +60:43:15.0: 9.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:23:44.13 +60:43:15.0: 9.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.19 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DX Cam,2461233.8284,8.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DX Cam 20260712.3284 8.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3284 2461233.8284 12.48 05:08:04.39 +59:46:26.8
150.46694 11.46127 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 284571961665720192
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.720 G 11.920 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:08:04.39 +59:46:26.8: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:08:04.39 +59:46:26.8: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 284571961665720192,2461233.8284,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 284571961665720192 20260712.3284 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3284 2461233.8284 12.63 05:09:36.46 +59:27:11.8
150.84862 11.43582 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J077.4021+59.4531 | 05:09:36.51 +59:27:11.1 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.393+/-0.027 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:09:36.46 +59:27:11.8: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:09:36.46 +59:27:11.8: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J077.4021+59.4531,2461233.8284,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J077.4021+59.4531 20260712.3284 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3284 2461233.8284 13.09 05:18:43.61 +60:39:48.7
150.47037 13.05516 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0518437+603950
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.305 R1 Y 2.059 R1 252.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:18:43.61 +60:39:48.7: 14.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:18:43.61 +60:39:48.7: 14.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0518437+603950,2461233.8284,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0518437+603950 20260712.3284 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.3284 2461233.8284 10.91 05:58:38.82 +63:43:51.4
149.97397 18.60009 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0558388+634352
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.925 R1 Y 0.617 R1 183.000000000000 M6+
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:58:38.82 +63:43:51.4: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:58:38.82 +63:43:51.4: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0558388+634352,2461233.8284,10.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0558388+634352 20260712.3284 10.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461233.82878693 12.07.2026 07:53:17.191 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 47 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17628
Objects passed selection criteria: 17522
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11469
Average stars matched: 11091.2 (96.7063 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125320 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 06:20:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461233.82878693 12.07.2026 07:53:17.191 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 158
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 104 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 120614
Objects passed selection criteria: 120265
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 80663.2
Average stars matched: 77234.5 (95.7493 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2018972 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 06:26:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461233.82799602
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:18.696 +61:56:33.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:08:18.696 +61:56:33.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0576 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:21.599 +61:57:14.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:08:21.599 +61:57:14.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:18.696 +61:56:33.75
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:21.599 +61:57:14.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01255 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6wRAYFVJgB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jRegTvEOcF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MbpbQcNLR2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UxaTKEkxP7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4913 deg
Loaded 14048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8129 out of 8891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8891 out of 18409 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.954200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.954200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4913 deg
Loaded 14048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8129 out of 8891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8891 out of 18409 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0234 to 95.6668 deg, Dec +55.2650 to +67.5032 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0234 to 95.6668 deg, Dec 55.2650 to 67.5032 deg
Loaded 14058 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8140 out of 8894 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8894 out of 18487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.0 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6wRAYFVJgB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1604, bad_region=0, passed=18409
Got 18409 stars (including 16782 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=203 n_q2=253 n_q3=240 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jRegTvEOcF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1596, bad_region=0, passed=18487
Got 18487 stars (including 16865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=193 n_q2=257 n_q3=247 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MbpbQcNLR2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=193, bad_region=0, passed=4607
Got 4607 stars (including 4409 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.816 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.525 n_q1=263 n_q2=140 n_q3=312 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UxaTKEkxP7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=191, bad_region=0, passed=4669
Got 4669 stars (including 4473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4669 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.776 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.590 n_q1=266 n_q2=139 n_q3=317 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.173
ref2=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.223
new1=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.637 worst_q_ratio=1.280
new2=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits sigma_overall=0.591 worst_q_ratio=1.313
reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.198
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:04:11.54 +57:05:30.5: 9.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:04:11.54 +57:05:30.5: 9.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:11.54 +57:05:30.5: ref_mag=9.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8534 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21214_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 21214_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:16.96 +66:08:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21294_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 21294_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10918_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 10918_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:17.74 +62:16:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14400_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 14400_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:42.43 +65:12:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04175_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 04175_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.71 +57:38:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03601_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 03601_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:56.19 +58:27:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04756_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 04756_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.84 +59:32:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10547_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 10547_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:45.13 +63:00:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14650_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 14650_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:50.81 +64:52:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11037_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 11037_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:34.50 +62:52:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06470_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 06470_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:25.25 +60:26:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10489_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 10489_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:09.94 +63:03:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:18.696 +61:56:33.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:08:18.696 +61:56:33.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0576 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:21.599 +61:57:14.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:08:21.599 +61:57:14.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:18.696 +61:56:33.75
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:21.599 +61:57:14.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01255 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a9hidQN1pa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j46emXDNnw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.spjYmVNwxa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LNXIlnZHnO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 131449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec +55.1951 to +67.5012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec 55.1951 to 67.5012 deg
Loaded 14165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6817 out of 9000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9000 out of 131449 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 131449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec +55.1951 to +67.5012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec 55.1951 to 67.5012 deg
Loaded 14165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6817 out of 9000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9000 out of 131449 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 130560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9473 to 95.7081 deg, Dec +55.1950 to +67.5042 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9473 to 95.7081 deg, Dec 55.1950 to 67.5042 deg
Loaded 14177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6855 out of 9006 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9006 out of 130560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 142 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
1.9 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.6 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.a9hidQN1pa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=12667, bad_region=6, passed=131418
Got 131418 stars (including 118525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 131418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=217 n_q2=245 n_q3=255 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.j46emXDNnw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=12449, bad_region=5, passed=130527
Got 130527 stars (including 117842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 130527 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=217 n_q2=250 n_q3=255 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.spjYmVNwxa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1182, bad_region=6, passed=31315
Got 31315 stars (including 30088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.683 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.857 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=256 n_q2=136 n_q3=329 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.357
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LNXIlnZHnO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1253, bad_region=8, passed=31843
Got 31843 stars (including 30532 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31843 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.810 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=266 n_q2=133 n_q3=324 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.383
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-52-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_030457_TTUQ1b1x1_553771_dIf4H1Vt/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:26:51.30 +57:47:28.1: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:59:33.38 +57:14:05.3: 9.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:04:11.59 +57:05:30.0: 9.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:04:30.97 +57:18:37.7: 9.64 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:03:54.99 +57:28:06.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:36:53.53 +64:10:36.6: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:00:07.62 +57:13:28.0: 10.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:57:23.46 +57:04:05.2: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:03:42.39 +57:38:13.5: 10.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:26:51.30 +57:47:28.1: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:04:30.97 +57:18:37.7: 9.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:03:54.99 +57:28:06.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:54.99 +57:28:06.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:36:53.53 +64:10:36.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:04:11.59 +57:05:30.0: 9.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:59:33.38 +57:14:05.3: 9.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.63 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:33.38 +57:14:05.3: ref_mag=9.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2735 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:51.30 +57:47:28.1: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3364 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:30.97 +57:18:37.7: ref_mag=9.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1816 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:53.53 +64:10:36.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0047 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:11.59 +57:05:30.0: ref_mag=9.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8509 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:00:07.62 +57:13:28.0: 10.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:03:42.39 +57:38:13.5: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:57:23.46 +57:04:05.2: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.09 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:07.62 +57:13:28.0: ref_mag=10.09 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4282 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:42.39 +57:38:13.5: ref_mag=10.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8051 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:23.46 +57:04:05.2: ref_mag=10.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6296 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:57:48.22 +56:55:26.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:02:27.42 +57:16:31.6: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:58:35.31 +56:55:52.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:03:09.09 +57:24:33.9: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:03:42.85 +57:33:48.2: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:03:54.21 +57:16:23.8: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:57:48.22 +56:55:26.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:48.22 +56:55:26.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:03:30.27 +57:12:04.9: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:54:46.94 +57:06:36.3: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:02:22.40 +57:04:04.6: 10.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:03:36.32 +57:00:12.1: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:58:35.31 +56:55:52.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:35.31 +56:55:52.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:03:54.21 +57:16:23.8: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:03:09.09 +57:24:33.9: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:02:27.42 +57:16:31.6: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:03:42.85 +57:33:48.2: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.85 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.73 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.65 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:27.42 +57:16:31.6: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1327 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:09.09 +57:24:33.9: ref_mag=10.85 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1126 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:42.85 +57:33:48.2: ref_mag=10.73 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1341 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:54.21 +57:16:23.8: ref_mag=10.65 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0687 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:03:30.27 +57:12:04.9: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:54:46.94 +57:06:36.3: 11.01 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:30.27 +57:12:04.9: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1925 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:02:22.40 +57:04:04.6: 10.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:03:36.32 +57:00:12.1: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:46.94 +57:06:36.3: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4206 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.63 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:22.40 +57:04:04.6: ref_mag=10.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2246 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:36.32 +57:00:12.1: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3169 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:00:09.40 +57:00:09.0: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:58:17.99 +57:06:08.3: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:04:09.53 +57:33:28.5: 11.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:59:28.56 +57:12:34.8: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:00:38.13 +57:02:23.7: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:49:57.86 +66:32:51.3: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:00:09.40 +57:00:09.0: 10.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.88 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:09.40 +57:00:09.0: ref_mag=10.88 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3334 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:58:17.99 +57:06:08.3: 11.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:04:09.53 +57:33:28.5: 11.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.28 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:17.99 +57:06:08.3: ref_mag=11.28 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6794 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:09.53 +57:33:28.5: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5480 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:17:37.32 +60:10:15.9: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:42:40.44 +58:26:17.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:59:20.97 +57:03:18.1: 11.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:59:28.56 +57:12:34.8: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:00:38.13 +57:02:23.7: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:28.56 +57:12:34.8: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8538 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:49:57.86 +66:32:51.3: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:38.13 +57:02:23.7: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8124 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:57.86 +66:32:51.3: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7984 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:42:40.44 +58:26:17.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:17:37.32 +60:10:15.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:40.44 +58:26:17.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5473 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:37.32 +60:10:15.9: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3850 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:59:20.97 +57:03:18.1: 11.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:20.97 +57:03:18.1: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9135 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:02:25.42 +57:03:00.6: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:04:41.50 +57:20:39.2: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:01:19.09 +57:03:40.1: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:55:20.64 +57:00:15.3: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:02:25.42 +57:03:00.6: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:01:19.09 +57:03:40.1: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:25.42 +57:03:00.6: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8692 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:04:41.50 +57:20:39.2: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:19.09 +57:03:40.1: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8998 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:41.50 +57:20:39.2: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0280 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:55:20.64 +57:00:15.3: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:20.64 +57:00:15.3: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9329 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:03:19.72 +57:38:05.1: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:58:13.99 +57:04:07.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:51:53.68 +64:26:39.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:03:19.72 +57:38:05.1: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:58:13.99 +57:04:07.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:19.72 +57:38:05.1: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2207 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:13.99 +57:04:07.9: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0007 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:51:53.68 +64:26:39.3: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:53.68 +64:26:39.3: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0207 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:23:44.13 +60:43:15.0: 9.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:08:04.39 +59:46:26.8: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:08:04.39 +59:46:26.8: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:23:44.13 +60:43:15.0: 9.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:08:04.39 +59:46:26.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4816 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:23:44.13 +60:43:15.0: ref_mag=9.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.2250 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:09:36.46 +59:27:11.8: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:09:36.46 +59:27:11.8: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:09:36.46 +59:27:11.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6268 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:18:43.61 +60:39:48.7: 14.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:58:38.82 +63:43:51.4: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:58:38.82 +63:43:51.4: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:18:43.61 +60:39:48.7: 14.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:58:38.82 +63:43:51.4: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9059 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:18:43.61 +60:39:48.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0901 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114136.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35077.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39429.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48128.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49542.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152425_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152425_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152427_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152427_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152438_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152438_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:03.91 +57:01:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152448_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152448_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:36.48 +56:55:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152534_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152534_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:08.51 +56:59:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152539_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152539_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152569_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152569_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.03 +66:08:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152633_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152633_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152710_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152710_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152723_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152723_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152795_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152795_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152831_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152831_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:12.45 +64:37:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152872_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152872_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152909_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152909_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152967_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152967_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:32.47 +63:12:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152988_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 152988_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153027_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153027_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:21.06 +58:57:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153068_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153068_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153072_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153072_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153076_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153076_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153109_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153109_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153125_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153125_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153169_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153169_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153210_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153210_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153250_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153250_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153270_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153270_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153289_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153289_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:57.90 +60:45:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153340_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153340_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:34.95 +59:25:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153367_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153367_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153373_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153373_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153404_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153404_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:50.73 +66:22:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153484_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153484_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153525_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153525_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:08.01 +66:49:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153625_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153625_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:52.01 +57:27:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153661_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153661_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153681_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153681_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153684_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153684_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:32.45 +62:23:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153698_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153698_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153712_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153712_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:32.63 +61:08:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153767_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153767_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:02.16 +62:21:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153769_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153769_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:11.67 +60:28:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153786_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153786_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153805_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153805_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153831_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153831_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153843_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153843_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:44.01 +64:58:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153866_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153866_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153894_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153894_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153899_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153899_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153934_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153934_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153962_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153962_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:27.97 +62:27:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153999_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153999_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:17.19 +62:42:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154028_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 154028_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:35.26 +62:38:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154047_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 154047_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:19.56 +57:09:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154090_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 154090_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154146_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 154146_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:15.66 +63:22:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154150_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 154150_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154153_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 154153_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:25.97 +62:03:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154220_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 154220_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154307_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 154307_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.91 +62:41:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154368_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 154368_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:01.75 +63:23:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126795_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 126795_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:05.65 +63:30:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48128_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 48128_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111330_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 111330_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:42.42 +65:12:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39429_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 39429_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109716_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 109716_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:50.82 +64:52:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124436_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 124436_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:38.40 +64:06:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62656_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 62656_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:38.66 +61:13:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78399_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 78399_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:27.56 +62:50:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48043_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 48043_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:12.98 +58:55:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44559_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 44559_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.16 +59:35:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82596_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 82596_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:34.50 +62:52:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68068_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 68068_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:06.58 +61:26:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19902_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 19902_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:58.23 +57:33:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114638_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 114638_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:44.04 +64:34:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35077_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 35077_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16109_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 16109_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:10.55 +56:41:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17362_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 17362_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.19 +57:44:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35828_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 35828_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:30.96 +59:02:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20171_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20171_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:56.29 +57:48:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124534_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 124534_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.84 +64:14:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123975_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 123975_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:30.30 +63:46:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29771_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 29771_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.74 +57:38:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115218_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 115218_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:22.32 +64:49:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28374_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 28374_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:58.58 +58:17:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121037_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 121037_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:46.14 +64:26:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29216_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 29216_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:06.67 +58:38:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41824_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 41824_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:10.06 +59:30:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92395_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 92395_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:51.84 +63:15:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43617_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 43617_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.94 +58:31:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81854_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 81854_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:17.53 +62:16:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40460_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 40460_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:04.27 +60:02:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49542_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 49542_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114136_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 114136_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10998_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 10998_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:18.75 +57:48:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34229_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 34229_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.83 +59:32:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56850_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 56850_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:04.58 +60:42:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46140_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 46140_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.61 +60:08:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49143_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 49143_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:36.04 +60:10:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30992_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30992_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:29.55 +57:43:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78569_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 78569_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:45.13 +63:00:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103232_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 103232_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:38.40 +62:33:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43092_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 43092_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:53.85 +60:10:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25460_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 25460_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:56.20 +58:27:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71135_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 71135_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:46.24 +62:14:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11549_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 11549_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:59.08 +57:53:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19139_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 19139_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:33.74 +57:24:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28304_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 28304_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:46.35 +57:49:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73742_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 73742_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:40.08 +62:28:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65419_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 65419_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:15.53 +61:45:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64558_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 64558_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:02.74 +61:50:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55788_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 55788_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:29.84 +61:10:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56673_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 56673_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:36.30 +61:04:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72637_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 72637_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:22.48 +62:39:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46344_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 46344_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:25.24 +60:26:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65063_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 65063_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:06.10 +61:30:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32056_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 32056_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:11.42 +59:24:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78190_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 78190_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:09.96 +63:03:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28801_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 28801_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:12.12 +59:01:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19986_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 19986_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:41.92 +57:24:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28091_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 28091_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.46 +58:58:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31948_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31948_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:09.64 +59:07:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61294_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 61294_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:15.24 +60:53:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125334_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 125334_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:14.98 +64:09:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57388_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 57388_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:08.30 +61:28:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14999_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 14999_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.92 +58:07:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110297_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 110297_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:32.06 +63:35:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75617_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 75617_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:04.38 +62:48:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117216_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 117216_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:12.55 +64:46:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89933_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 89933_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:03.23 +66:20:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21185_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 21185_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:10.65 +58:47:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05929_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 05929_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:27.91 +57:32:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46276_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 46276_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:13.20 +60:27:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111003_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 111003_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:39.05 +63:27:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31737_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31737_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:08.28 +59:23:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99126_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 99126_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:35.10 +66:05:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24661_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 24661_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:00.87 +57:35:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29092_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 29092_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.77 +57:27:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104727_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 104727_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:26.23 +65:41:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36615_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 36615_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:57.68 +59:53:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65521_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 65521_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:48.32 +60:44:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31784_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31784_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:08.27 +57:51:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100794_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 100794_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-53-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks