This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2948 2461233.7948 9.11 20:14:10.24 -15:53:44.3
27.29178 -25.29074 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" TU Cap
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.200 V 11.290 V 2452115.90000 90.000000000000 : M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:14:10.24 -15:53:44.3: 10.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:14:10.24 -15:53:44.3: 10.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.07 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.2948* 20 14 10.24 -15 53 44.3 9.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TU Cap,2461233.7948,9.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TU Cap 20260712.2948 9.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2948 2461233.7948 12.38 20:11:44.42 -13:46:36.4
29.17356 -23.90969 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix 0 -1 1 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:11:44.42 -13:46:36.4: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:11:44.42 -13:46:36.4: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.2948* 20 11 44.42 -13 46 36.4 12.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.7948,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.2948 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2948 2461233.7948 13.39 20:23:17.95 -16:19:49.5
27.79014 -27.48087 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1819 Laputa 0 0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:23:17.95 -16:19:49.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:23:17.95 -16:19:49.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.2948* 20 23 17.95 -16 19 49.5 13.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.7948,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.2948 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2948 2461233.7948 13.71 20:32:50.99 -15:03:33.0
30.13129 -29.10896 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.479 Caprera 1 1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:32:50.99 -15:03:33.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:32:50.99 -15:03:33.0: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.2948* 20 32 50.99 -15 03 33.0 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.7948,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.2948 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 12.2948 2461233.7948 13.93 20:13:30.77 -13:11:45.9
29.94600 -24.06731 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.190 Ismene -1 -1 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:30.77 -13:11:45.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:13:30.77 -13:11:45.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 12.2948* 20 13 30.77 -13 11 45.9 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461233.7948,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260712.2948 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461233.79590875 12.07.2026 07:05:56.516 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 75 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10100
Objects passed selection criteria: 10073
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7990
Average stars matched: 7811 (97.7597 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 05:57:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461233.79590875 12.07.2026 07:05:56.516 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 35
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 62 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 71134
Objects passed selection criteria: 71004
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58153.8
Average stars matched: 56069.2 (96.4155 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 173304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jul 11 21:08:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-146-gb95cfcf3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 12 06:03:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461233.79362038
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:27.825 -18:01:16.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:27.825 -18:01:16.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0524 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:27.724 -18:01:39.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:27.724 -18:01:39.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0544 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:27.825 -18:01:16.98
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:27.724 -18:01:39.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00630 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jBDAh2vVun
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LYsmFGwPVm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6RCNDLOmq9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OK5jQXFnXo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2184 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2671 to -12.6728 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2184 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2671 to -12.6728 deg
Loaded 8299 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6584 out of 6783 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6783 out of 10456 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jBDAh2vVun (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=584, bad_region=0, passed=10504
Got 10504 stars (including 9908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=215 n_q2=286 n_q3=220 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LYsmFGwPVm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=591, bad_region=0, passed=10452
Got 10452 stars (including 9856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=218 n_q2=289 n_q3=217 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6RCNDLOmq9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=235, bad_region=0, passed=5680
Got 5680 stars (including 5441 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5680 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=237 n_q2=229 n_q3=258 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OK5jQXFnXo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, bad_region=0, passed=5509
Got 5509 stars (including 5188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5509 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=246 n_q2=240 n_q3=250 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.128
ref2=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.148
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.240
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.067
reference average sigma_overall=0.444 worst_q_ratio=1.138
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:14:10.24 -15:53:44.3: 10.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:14:10.24 -15:53:44.3: 10.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.07 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:14:10.24 -15:53:44.3: ref_mag=10.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.0918 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20641_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:55.21 -12:56:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07212_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 07212_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:14:10.24 -15:53:44.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:27.825 -18:01:16.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:27.825 -18:01:16.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0524 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:27.724 -18:01:39.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:27.724 -18:01:39.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0544 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:27.825 -18:01:16.98
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:27.724 -18:01:39.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00630 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.20WIfiZwKw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8qiTwv0sxh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pH4PJi7Akl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KoM5AekmoL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76668 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6610 out of 7336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7336 out of 76668 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.552300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.552300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76668 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6610 out of 7336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7336 out of 76668 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 76873 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2034 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2844 to -12.6291 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2034 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2844 to -12.6291 deg
Loaded 8377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6585 out of 7338 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7338 out of 76873 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 33 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.9 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.20WIfiZwKw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4300, bad_region=1, passed=76649
Got 76649 stars (including 72232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76649 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=226 n_q2=279 n_q3=217 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8qiTwv0sxh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=4343, bad_region=0, passed=76851
Got 76851 stars (including 72409 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=230 n_q2=282 n_q3=213 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pH4PJi7Akl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1428, bad_region=2, passed=34557
Got 34557 stars (including 33075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34557 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=227 n_q2=225 n_q3=265 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KoM5AekmoL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1571, bad_region=2, passed=46264
Got 46264 stars (including 44607 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=239 n_q2=252 n_q3=243 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-02-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-12_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020640_TTUQ1b1x1_2572125_8r74IAU4/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:21.47 -13:36:04.7: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:04:04.98 -20:18:12.7: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:56:55.79 -19:12:52.4: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:05:24.56 -12:52:25.1: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:18:07.44 -13:34:47.3: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:18:18.85 -15:44:53.5: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:11:44.42 -13:46:36.4: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:45:20.62 -15:47:15.3: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:03:38.51 -15:24:40.3: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:58:21.47 -13:36:04.7: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:21.47 -13:36:04.7: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0572 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:56:55.79 -19:12:52.4: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:05:24.56 -12:52:25.1: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:04:04.98 -20:18:12.7: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:18:07.44 -13:34:47.3: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:18:18.85 -15:44:53.5: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:55.79 -19:12:52.4: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7021 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:24.56 -12:52:25.1: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4364 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:04.98 -20:18:12.7: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1152 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:07.44 -13:34:47.3: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6210 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:18.85 -15:44:53.5: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3362 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:11:44.42 -13:46:36.4: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:58:03.38 -12:44:50.6: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:45:20.62 -15:47:15.3: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:20.62 -15:47:15.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4129 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:03:38.51 -15:24:40.3: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:38.51 -15:24:40.3: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6940 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 19:58:03.38 -12:44:50.6: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:03.38 -12:44:50.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9016 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:38.30 -19:38:16.1: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:38.92 -15:22:22.6: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:17:01.77 -15:10:24.1: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:36.21 -15:22:29.4: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:03:37.27 -15:25:20.8: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:30:19.35 -13:01:34.8: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:34:53.24 -15:48:29.6: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:57:38.30 -19:38:16.1: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:58:38.92 -15:22:22.6: 12.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:58:36.21 -15:22:29.4: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:38.30 -19:38:16.1: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3701 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:03:37.27 -15:25:20.8: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:17:01.77 -15:10:24.1: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:38.92 -15:22:22.6: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6598 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:36.21 -15:22:29.4: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6983 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:37.27 -15:25:20.8: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0094 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:01.77 -15:10:24.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6767 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:19:48.80 -15:00:39.9: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:20.06 -20:01:34.6: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:30:19.35 -13:01:34.8: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:19.35 -13:01:34.8: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0210 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:34:53.24 -15:48:29.6: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:53.24 -15:48:29.6: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1387 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:19:48.80 -15:00:39.9: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:48.80 -15:00:39.9: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2066 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:16:20.06 -20:01:34.6: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:20.06 -20:01:34.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0370 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:35:18.81 -13:34:36.0: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:26:00.51 -15:25:07.2: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:32:50.99 -15:03:33.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:01:20.11 -15:04:02.0: 13.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:23:17.95 -16:19:49.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:30.77 -13:11:45.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:35:18.81 -13:34:36.0: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:32:50.99 -15:03:33.0: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:18.81 -13:34:36.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2957 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:26:00.51 -15:25:07.2: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:23:17.95 -16:19:49.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:01:20.11 -15:04:02.0: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:00.51 -15:25:07.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6056 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:20.11 -15:04:02.0: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4917 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:13:30.77 -13:11:45.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94411.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94483.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94507.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93311_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93311_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93317_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93317_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93319_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93319_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93320_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93320_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93321_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93321_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93322_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93322_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93402_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93402_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:48.84 -12:44:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93579_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93579_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93687_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93687_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:12.33 -14:47:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93705_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 93705_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93797_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93797_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93840_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93840_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93860_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93860_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93864_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93864_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93868_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93868_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93939_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93939_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:31.65 -15:16:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93966_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93966_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93975_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93975_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93978_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 93978_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94008_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 94008_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94021_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 94021_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94131_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 94131_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94198_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 94198_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94206_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 94206_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94211_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 94211_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94260_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 94260_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94298_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 94298_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94411_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 94411_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94483_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 94483_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94487_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 94487_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94507_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 94507_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44954_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 44954_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:55.21 -12:56:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73043_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 73043_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_02-05-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks