NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-07-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 12.19951    2461233.69951    14.31    12:07:35.96 +55:58:57.2   0711 1364   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.95    12:07:36.21 +55:59:03.1   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 12.1997  2461233.6997  14.13  12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2
135.24488  60.08460 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 0.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits at 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2:  15.90 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits at 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMa-07-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits
Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-07-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-07-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 355543 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 355543 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits_preview.png'
UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits

renamed 'UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits_preview.png'
UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 486.9366 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 494.6190 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1276.9228 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 420.9955 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1278.6145 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 420.8582 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.62236 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-11T23:47:07.2934441' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-12T04:47:07.2934441' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61233.1993899653 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-12T04:47:17.1936292' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61233.1995045487 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 169.410309126406 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 54.000029883736 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.5369444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 318.758888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.22962250643934 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-07' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29514 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29514 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 7.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits :) Spent 0.853088 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-11T23:47:48.8759662' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-12T04:47:48.8759662' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61233.1998712383 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-12T04:47:58.7776603' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61233.199985845 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 169.410309143584 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 54.0000299102102 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.4405555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 318.801944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.23708669619589 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-07' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29514 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29514 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 7.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits :) Spent 0.913012 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461233.69950571 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:37.617 +53:59:41.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:59.786 +53:59:45.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:17:37.617 +53:59:41.04 Second-epoch image center 11:17:59.786 +53:59:45.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0543 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:59.987 +53:59:47.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:17:37.617 +53:59:41.04 Second-epoch image center 11:17:59.987 +53:59:47.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0548 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:17:59.786 +53:59:45.18 Second-epoch second image center 11:17:59.987 +53:59:47.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00078 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00078 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RcOEVbD135 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vnl1oeZL9D Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F96cS8R0A3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lY9AzcD2pq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6620 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0172 to 183.7787 deg, Dec +47.6712 to +59.4177 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0172 to 183.7787 deg, Dec 47.6712 to 59.4177 deg Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3515 out of 3670 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3670 out of 6620 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6620 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0172 to 183.7787 deg, Dec +47.6712 to +59.4177 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0172 to 183.7787 deg, Dec 47.6712 to 59.4177 deg Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3515 out of 3670 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3670 out of 6620 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9050 to 183.7788 deg, Dec +47.6710 to +59.4351 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9050 to 183.7788 deg, Dec 47.6710 to 59.4351 deg Loaded 5285 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3519 out of 3673 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 6666 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 2.1 pix UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.RcOEVbD135 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=433, bad_region=0, passed=6620 Got 6620 stars (including 6177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6620 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6546 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6547 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6547 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=253 n_q2=228 n_q3=252 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Vnl1oeZL9D (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, bad_region=0, passed=6666 Got 6666 stars (including 6218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6592 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6592 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6592 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=253 n_q2=224 n_q3=258 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.F96cS8R0A3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=3381 Got 3381 stars (including 3175 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3381 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3355 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3354 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3354 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=237 n_q2=251 n_q3=238 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.lY9AzcD2pq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=253, bad_region=0, passed=3432 Got 3432 stars (including 3174 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3432 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3411 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3410 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3410 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=235 n_q2=254 n_q3=233 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.116 ref2=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.147 new1=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.095 new2=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.227 reference average sigma_overall=0.2965 worst_q_ratio=1.1315 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:37.617 +53:59:41.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:59.786 +53:59:45.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:17:37.617 +53:59:41.04 Second-epoch image center 11:17:59.786 +53:59:45.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0543 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:59.987 +53:59:47.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:17:37.617 +53:59:41.04 Second-epoch image center 11:17:59.987 +53:59:47.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0548 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:17:59.786 +53:59:45.18 Second-epoch second image center 11:17:59.987 +53:59:47.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00078 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00078 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NmIiMionEV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.giuTF2f9Tv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s1FiM52z8q Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3L619wriBt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 33526 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9050 to 183.7787 deg, Dec +47.5582 to +59.4325 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9050 to 183.7787 deg, Dec 47.5582 to 59.4325 deg Loaded 5323 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3392 out of 3682 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3682 out of 33526 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.785650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.785650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 33526 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9050 to 183.7787 deg, Dec +47.5582 to +59.4325 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9050 to 183.7787 deg, Dec 47.5582 to 59.4325 deg Loaded 5323 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3392 out of 3682 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3682 out of 33526 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 33482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9050 to 183.7787 deg, Dec +47.5813 to +59.4422 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9050 to 183.7787 deg, Dec 47.5813 to 59.4422 deg Loaded 5320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3384 out of 3685 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3685 out of 33482 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 2.0 pix UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 2.0 pix wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 2.0 pix wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits 14.5 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 14.5 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.NmIiMionEV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1339, bad_region=1, passed=33515 Got 33515 stars (including 32119 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33515 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33168 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=251 n_q2=231 n_q3=252 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.giuTF2f9Tv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1409, bad_region=1, passed=33469 Got 33469 stars (including 31998 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33469 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33117 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33120 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33120 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=248 n_q2=223 n_q3=257 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.s1FiM52z8q (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=990, bad_region=6, passed=20416 Got 20416 stars (including 19395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20416 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20230 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20229 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20229 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=234 n_q2=254 n_q3=234 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.3L619wriBt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=726, bad_region=6, passed=20200 Got 20200 stars (including 19440 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20200 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20071 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20072 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20072 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=233 n_q2=256 n_q3=233 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits at 11:29:56.61 +54:28:50.7: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits at 11:35:38.99 +51:22:29.7: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits at 11:29:56.61 +54:28:50.7: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:56.61 +54:28:50.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9492 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits at 11:35:38.99 +51:22:29.7: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:38.99 +51:22:29.7: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3864 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-34-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits at 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-35-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0323.fits at 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53949.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52145_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52145_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.33    12:01:35.52 +53:52:29.7   0939 2731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 12:01:35.61 +53:52:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52146_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52146_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.22    10:33:45.63 +56:18:53.2   8585 1729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52147_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52147_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.05    11:28:33.19 +58:33:46.9   4132 0376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52248_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52248_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    11.04    11:25:17.19 +56:10:36.9   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52294_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52294_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    11.47    12:01:39.26 +55:53:23.4   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52312_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52312_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    11.44    11:21:32.57 +49:29:24.3   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52327_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52327_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    11.68    11:25:20.38 +57:07:39.2   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52358_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52358_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    11.99    11:34:06.99 +57:50:00.4   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52424_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52424_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.21    11:29:46.06 +49:12:15.8   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52433_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52433_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.06    11:19:03.04 +48:55:22.2   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52460_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52460_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.26    11:17:14.46 +56:48:56.2   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52461_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52461_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.43    11:53:16.37 +57:01:41.5   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52484_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52484_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.27    11:16:46.08 +49:26:50.4   4739 5943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:16:46.06 +49:26:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52503_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52503_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.44    10:53:28.08 +49:13:04.0   7032 6127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 10:53:28.23 +49:13:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52511_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52511_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.38    10:38:47.83 +53:30:33.3   8289 3462   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 10:38:47.87 +53:30:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52515_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52515_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.70    12:01:30.28 +48:59:56.9   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52562_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52562_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.73    11:50:32.97 +49:36:19.4   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52591_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52591_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.79    11:57:13.25 +58:01:43.3   1825 0343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:57:13.24 +58:01:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52603_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52603_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.58    10:30:49.08 +51:49:59.9   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52608_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52608_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.57    10:41:59.27 +52:58:18.2   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52695_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52695_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 12.19951    2461233.69951    12.97    11:29:56.65 +54:28:50.2   3767 2817   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.93    11:29:56.56 +54:28:51.1   3767 2818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52702_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52702_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    12.99    11:27:38.59 +55:47:37.9   4043 2051   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:27:38.58 +55:47:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52723_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52723_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.16    12:13:54.81 +57:51:23.6   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52728_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52728_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.05    11:21:36.96 +57:04:11.9   4609 1327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:21:36.93 +57:04:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52772_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52772_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.08    11:00:24.42 +51:28:25.4   6344 4764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:00:24.42 +51:28:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52814_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52814_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.04    10:52:22.76 +52:31:32.3   7081 4119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 10:52:22.75 +52:31:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52826_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52826_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.06    11:32:30.76 +57:12:51.1   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52941_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 52941_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 12.19951    2461233.69951    13.38    11:35:38.93 +51:22:30.4   3037 4619   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.39    11:35:39.04 +51:22:29.0   3038 4619   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53081_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53081_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.53    11:28:45.29 +55:28:03.3   3930 2237   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53201_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53201_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.73    10:57:06.70 +52:22:01.4   6647 4223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 10:57:06.58 +52:22:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53216_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53216_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.44    11:36:31.66 +49:24:28.5   2803 5792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53277_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53277_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.43    10:31:09.34 +50:00:33.6   9205 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53307_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53307_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.69    11:56:44.90 +52:16:35.5   1173 3770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:56:44.88 +52:16:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53325_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53325_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.69    11:41:51.36 +56:45:50.4   2932 1323   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:41:51.39 +56:45:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53339_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53339_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.62    11:40:22.08 +52:15:38.7   2672 4032   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:40:22.09 +52:15:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53390_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53390_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.55    10:56:44.67 +53:07:03.5   6675 3770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53392_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53392_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.63    11:27:12.61 +50:54:40.0   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53455_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53455_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.78    12:02:06.26 +54:14:11.9   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53558_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53558_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.72    10:38:11.94 +56:47:23.4   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53597_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53597_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    14.13    12:07:09.09 +57:57:26.3   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53617_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53617_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.91    11:34:43.97 +51:44:15.9   3150 4412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:34:44.06 +51:44:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53686_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53686_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.51    10:33:52.88 +53:29:21.4   8735 3437   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 10:33:52.96 +53:29:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53731_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53731_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.94    11:32:11.03 +57:47:59.4   3796 0806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:32:11.16 +57:48:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53771_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53771_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.83    11:18:36.75 +55:16:05.6   4784 2428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 11:18:36.72 +55:16:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53830_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53830_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    14.04    12:06:37.99 +56:38:09.8   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53853_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53853_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.61    10:34:52.17 +50:00:31.7   8840 5554   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53931_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53931_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    13.97    10:56:56.97 +55:51:33.8   6637 2117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits **** FOUND 10:56:57.14 +55:51:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53949_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 Preparing report for the candidate 53949_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53981_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53981_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    14.19    11:11:42.70 +50:06:14.0   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53983_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53983_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    14.16    11:56:48.02 +56:53:39.0   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53988_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 The candidate 53988_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 12.19999    2461233.69999    14.36    11:56:23.25 +53:53:48.2   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-11_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_235233_TTUQ1b1x1_2076314_hdnZIqPU/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-11_23-47-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 21s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2 ########### Completed UMa-07-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2 ################################################################################### 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 12:07:36.09 +55:59:00.2 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461233.69950571 -observatory V36 07:27:16.10 +17:05:53.2 Mercury (5.5mag) 10:19:21.34 +11:52:00.8 Venus (-4.1mag) 04:29:39.04 +21:38:45.5 Mars (1.3mag) 08:18:21.32 +20:06:09.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:02.48 +03:21:08.0 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:07:35.05 +20:46:00.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:17:00.78 +00:20:30.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:30:44.72 -23:18:49.4 Pluto (14.4mag) 05:07:17.64 +26:55:47.4 Moon (-8.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 12 00:23 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461233.69950571: 08:18:28.79 +20:05:43.0 Io (6.1mag) 08:18:19.74 +20:06:15.4 Europa (6.3mag) 08:18:25.99 +20:05:49.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:18:36.45 +20:05:10.3 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:16:47.72 +19:51:06.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:18:20.25 +20:06:14.9 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:16:08.65 +19:55:09.9 Elara (17.6mag) 08:21:56.96 +19:59:20.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:23:12.83 +20:11:30.7 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:59.35 +03:20:41.4 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:06.78 +03:20:56.3 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:55:29.77 +03:19:55.9 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:03.95 +03:21:36.8 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:00.75 +03:18:05.6 Phoebe (16.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 12 00:23 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461233.69950571: 17:49:16.95 -32:36:43.4 JWST 06:47:55.25 -15:51:44.6 Chandra 19:49:18.00 +16:04:34.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 12 00:23 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461233.69950571 -observatory V36 02:38:53.57 +14:38:52.0 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:16:31.64 -34:24:48.6 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:27:31.42 -68:10:09.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:01:26.86 +32:28:42.4 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 01:58:09.42 +11:46:46.7 15.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:58:25.16 +32:16:53.3 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:14:30.42 +26:54:35.5 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:57:07.45 +29:41:54.1 16.8mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:10:55.64 +05:02:04.2 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:06:05.75 +21:13:21.2 18.0mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:11:24.49 -11:25:49.0 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:47:00.34 +67:36:27.0 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:27:15.93 -10:16:17.6 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:03:51.23 +65:48:28.7 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:35:13.99 +30:05:51.7 14.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:15:26.45 +15:22:35.8 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:38:57.49 +39:45:06.3 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:45:39.96 +46:16:48.6 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:51:22.93 -13:42:45.1 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:36:06.11 +28:45:42.2 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:15:37.87 -13:03:13.5 16.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:58:14.16 +22:21:27.5 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:45:14.29 +03:51:31.3 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:46:46.07 +79:09:15.8 17.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:48:13.87 +45:19:10.4 16.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:26:41.36 +04:52:17.8 17.0mag A/2026 E1 21:21:57.17 -15:44:21.8 7.2mag 10P/Tempel 11:14:19.33 -01:57:58.7 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:02:50.11 +29:45:14.4 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:11:56.14 +13:25:21.9 17.0mag 63P/Wild 00:49:09.57 -05:04:20.2 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 08:32:42.83 +34:07:38.5 18.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 04:31:52.05 +20:16:25.8 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:25:19.31 +10:51:51.5 16.2mag 88P/Howell 06:41:01.83 +30:25:29.4 15.7mag 93P/Lovas 04:26:59.83 +31:11:53.5 16.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:13:12.61 +30:29:50.9 15.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:51:34.62 +00:26:05.8 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos 04:54:41.82 +20:51:56.3 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:39:44.45 +19:41:57.2 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 00:02:02.56 +03:00:25.2 17.9mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 07:20:21.74 +16:37:15.0 15.8mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:17:37.44 -20:57:06.8 15.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 05:39:43.03 +34:20:40.0 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:59:40.40 +16:13:43.7 14.6mag 169P/NEAT 01:45:26.56 +07:48:20.6 17.7mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:44.02 -08:27:32.0 17.1mag 235P/LINEAR 08:49:10.81 +33:07:44.6 17.9mag 240P/NEAT 20:41:23.23 -49:58:23.2 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:04:28.74 +12:57:33.5 15.7mag 260P/McNaught 05:42:49.80 +36:59:23.8 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:31.43 +05:53:32.4 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:36:15.73 +19:36:06.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:54:40.08 +39:03:46.3 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jul 12 00:23 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 12 00:23 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 12 00:23 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 00:36:20.815 -44:09:38.45 AT 2026teq 2026-07-06.42 22.7941 19:49:39.327 -27:34:48.80 AT 2026tep 2026-07-06.28 22.0721 19:41:45.859 -13:51:17.06 AT 2026teo 2026-07-06.29 21.9021 19:50:54.969 -16:24:44.71 AT 2026ten 2026-07-06.28 21.7555 19:20:22.817 -19:03:16.82 AT 2026tem 2026-07-06.27 22.8769 19:50:32.092 -27:38:04.96 AT 2026tel 2026-07-06.28 22.4265 19:55:04.739 -14:08:25.57 AT 2026tek 2026-07-06.29 23.2157 19:57:12.832 -25:50:29.91 AT 2026tej 2026-07-06.28 22.4394 20:08:29.816 -17:11:06.28 AT 2026tei 2026-07-06.29 22.2561 19:45:11.804 -15:09:28.01 AT 2026teh 2026-07-06.29 22.3212 19:50:38.613 -26:57:45.41 AT 2026teg 2026-07-06.28 22.2494 19:57:16.373 -11:46:44.61 AT 2026tef 2026-07-06.29 21.852 20:00:45.354 -13:50:39.75 AT 2026tee 2026-07-06.29 22.3091 19:40:36.612 -16:01:17.08 AT 2026ted 2026-07-06.29 22.388 19:22:09.736 -19:16:09.34 AT 2026tec 2026-07-06.27 21.7757 19:47:45.246 -15:55:39.96 AT 2026teb 2026-07-06.28 21.4953 20:10:20.838 -19:36:44.96 AT 2026tea 2026-07-06.28 21.7025 19:47:53.287 -27:24:18.19 AT 2026tdz 2026-07-06.28 21.5295 19:43:06.898 -13:47:14.92 AT 2026tdy 2026-07-06.29 22.8632 04:10:05.283 -46:22:02.32 AT 2026tdx 2026-07-06.42 22.094 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 12 00:23 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 91 C