This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1558 2461232.6558 11.36 12:24:57.43 -02:38:14.5
289.79408 59.55722 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia 0 0 0 11.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:24:57.43 -02:38:14.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:24:57.43 -02:38:14.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 11.1558* 12 24 57.43 -02 38 14.5 11.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6558,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1558 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1558 2461232.6558 12.66 11:56:39.76 +02:44:00.5
272.34674 62.30718 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.65 Cybele -0 0 0 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:56:39.76 +02:44:00.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:56:39.76 +02:44:00.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 11.1558* 11 56 39.76 +02 44 00.5 12.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6558,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1558 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1558 2461232.6558 12.67 11:46:21.34 +01:04:00.2
269.29774 59.61933 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna -0 1 1 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:46:21.34 +01:04:00.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:46:21.34 +01:04:00.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 11.1558* 11 46 21.34 +01 04 00.2 12.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6558,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1558 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1558 2461232.6558 13.53 12:17:11.98 -02:59:56.2
286.27724 58.76127 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.326 Tamara -0 0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:17:11.98 -02:59:56.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:17:11.98 -02:59:56.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 11.1558* 12 17 11.98 -02 59 56.2 13.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6558,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1558 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1558 2461232.6558 13.53 11:33:07.75 -00:18:14.4
265.28350 56.73134 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.35 Leukothea 0 0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:33:07.75 -00:18:14.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:33:07.75 -00:18:14.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 11.1558* 11 33 07.75 +00 18 14.4 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6558,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1558 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1558 2461232.6558 13.68 12:19:47.53 -01:23:58.2
286.71956 60.47230 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.122 Gerda -0 0 0 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:19:47.53 -01:23:58.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:19:47.53 -01:23:58.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 11.1558* 12 19 47.53 -01 23 58.2 13.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6558,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1558 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1558 2461232.6558 13.75 11:46:51.51 -02:47:03.9
272.91439 56.27670 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis 0 1 1 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:46:51.51 -02:47:03.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:46:51.51 -02:47:03.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 11.1558* 11 46 51.51 -02 47 03.9 13.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6558,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1558 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1558 2461232.6558 13.88 11:43:21.04 -00:09:21.3
269.20127 58.18522 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita -1 1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:43:21.04 -00:09:21.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:43:21.04 -00:09:21.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 11.1558* 11 43 21.04 +00 09 21.3 13.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6558,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1558 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 11.1558 2461232.6558 14.38 11:55:03.20 +00:18:39.2
273.82366 59.95708 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia -1 1 1 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:55:03.20 +00:18:39.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:55:03.20 +00:18:39.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 11.1558* 11 55 03.20 +00 18 39.2 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461232.6558,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260711.1558 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70868228 08.05.2026 05:00:20.149 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
First image: 2461168.70868228 08.05.2026 05:00:20.149 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Last image: 2461232.65610023 11.07.2026 03:44:37.060 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5583
Objects passed selection criteria: 5573
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4734.75
Average stars matched: 4617 (97.5131 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 10 19:09:57 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-143-g13f85f26
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 22:57:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70868228 08.05.2026 05:00:20.149 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
First image: 2461168.70868228 08.05.2026 05:00:20.149 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Last image: 2461232.65610023 11.07.2026 03:44:37.060 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 93
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30086
Objects passed selection criteria: 29996
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27366.5
Average stars matched: 26449.5 (96.6492 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132960 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 10 19:09:57 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-143-g13f85f26
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 22:59:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461232.65556693
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.644 -02:00:10.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.644 -02:00:10.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.837 -02:00:12.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63
Second-epoch image center 11:59:57.837 -02:00:12.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.644 -02:00:10.72
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:57.837 -02:00:12.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01170 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H3kbS5fL0h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pmwiTEExzW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HSDKiOdaXT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jAzDrQ31qH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5758 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1470 to 187.8716 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2677 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1470 to 187.8716 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2677 deg
Loaded 3702 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3218 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3218 out of 5758 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.772300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.772300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5758 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1470 to 187.8716 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2677 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1470 to 187.8716 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2677 deg
Loaded 3702 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3218 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3218 out of 5758 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3225 out of 5769 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
2.4 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.H3kbS5fL0h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, bad_region=0, passed=5758
Got 5758 stars (including 5388 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=243 n_q2=230 n_q3=245 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pmwiTEExzW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, bad_region=0, passed=5769
Got 5769 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=240 n_q2=228 n_q3=252 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HSDKiOdaXT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=0, passed=3794
Got 3794 stars (including 3561 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3794 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.421 n_q1=265 n_q2=205 n_q3=279 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jAzDrQ31qH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=211, bad_region=0, passed=3740
Got 3740 stars (including 3526 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3740 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=273 n_q2=202 n_q3=273 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.176
ref2=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.115
new1=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new2=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.262
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.1455
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:24:57.43 -02:38:14.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:28:49.94 -06:31:29.1: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:24:57.43 -02:38:14.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:28:49.94 -06:31:29.1: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:49.94 -06:31:29.1: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5965 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20389.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20297_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20297_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:14.53 +01:19:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20304_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20304_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:40.62 -06:10:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20311_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20311_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:43.13 -06:18:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20318_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20318_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:30.65 -06:19:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20329_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20329_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:21.59 -05:45:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20353_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:10.35 -06:32:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20360_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:17.47 -05:08:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20363_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:52.59 -06:04:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20368_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:05.41 -05:46:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20389_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 20389_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20390_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20390_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:09.27 -05:49:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20404_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20404_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20418_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20418_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:14:36.53 -06:02:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20425_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20425_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:57.29 -06:03:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20427_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 20427_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:32.68 -06:23:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
12:24:57.43 -02:38:14.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.644 -02:00:10.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.644 -02:00:10.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.837 -02:00:12.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63
Second-epoch image center 11:59:57.837 -02:00:12.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.644 -02:00:10.72
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:57.837 -02:00:12.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01170 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vAzVkMxBqS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ik8y3peFXs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9S6oODQXxU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6uYIMp17WJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31658 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1443 to 187.8895 deg, Dec -7.2663 to +3.2677 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1443 to 187.8895 deg, Dec -7.2663 to 3.2677 deg
Loaded 3711 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3068 out of 3280 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3280 out of 31658 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.651000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.651000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31658 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1443 to 187.8895 deg, Dec -7.2663 to +3.2677 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1443 to 187.8895 deg, Dec -7.2663 to 3.2677 deg
Loaded 3711 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3068 out of 3280 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3280 out of 31658 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 31480 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3710 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3069 out of 3283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3283 out of 31480 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vAzVkMxBqS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1338, bad_region=0, passed=31633
Got 31633 stars (including 30253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=239 n_q2=230 n_q3=252 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ik8y3peFXs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1333, bad_region=0, passed=31456
Got 31456 stars (including 30088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31456 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.487 n_q1=239 n_q2=228 n_q3=251 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9S6oODQXxU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=619, bad_region=0, passed=23674
Got 23674 stars (including 23012 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=269 n_q2=209 n_q3=275 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6uYIMp17WJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=687, bad_region=1, passed=23556
Got 23556 stars (including 22827 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23556 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=274 n_q2=204 n_q3=274 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_224719_TTUQ1b1x1_3879565_gvrqYcXw/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:00:28.06 +02:33:24.7: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:36:13.61 -03:33:18.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:31:15.11 +01:07:29.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:00:28.06 +02:33:24.7: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:36:13.61 -03:33:18.7: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:28.06 +02:33:24.7: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4014 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:13.61 -03:33:18.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6784 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:31:15.11 +01:07:29.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:15.11 +01:07:29.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:28:49.94 -06:31:29.0: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:46:21.34 +01:04:00.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:56:39.76 +02:44:00.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:28:49.94 -06:31:29.0: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:49.94 -06:31:29.0: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3667 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:29:44.06 -06:34:06.9: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:56:39.76 +02:44:00.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:46:21.34 +01:04:00.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:31:18.57 -06:36:48.7: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:17:11.98 -02:59:56.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:30:37.07 -03:22:43.0: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:29:44.06 -06:34:06.9: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:44.06 -06:34:06.9: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6261 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:31:18.57 -06:36:48.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:18.57 -06:36:48.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1277 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:17:11.98 -02:59:56.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:30:37.07 -03:22:43.0: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:33:07.75 -00:18:14.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:37.07 -03:22:43.0: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2404 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:19:47.53 -01:23:58.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:33:07.75 -00:18:14.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:46:51.51 -02:47:03.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:19:47.53 -01:23:58.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:43:21.04 -00:09:21.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:17:26.29 -02:03:11.5: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:46:51.51 -02:47:03.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:43:21.04 -00:09:21.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:31:02.71 -06:31:16.4: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:17:26.29 -02:03:11.5: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:26.29 -02:03:11.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1147 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:31:02.71 -06:31:16.4: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:02.71 -06:31:16.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8144 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:32:39.65 -06:34:34.9: 14.12 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:32:39.65 -06:34:34.9: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:39.65 -06:34:34.9: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6741 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:31:31.53 -02:31:00.6: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:31:31.53 -02:31:00.6: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:31.53 -02:31:00.6: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0035 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:55:03.20 +00:18:39.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:29:41.50 -00:38:03.3: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:29:41.50 -00:38:03.3: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:41.50 -00:38:03.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5565 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:55:03.20 +00:18:39.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:27:43.61 +01:15:49.6: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:27:43.61 +01:15:49.6: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:43.61 +01:15:49.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6874 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 12:27:12.75 -03:28:58.1: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:27:12.75 -03:28:58.1: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:12.75 -03:28:58.1: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5801 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 11:29:19.15 -02:42:39.8: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:29:19.15 -02:42:39.8: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:19.15 -02:42:39.8: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0174 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52635.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52644.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52823.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52885.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52929.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53032.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52386_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52386_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52387_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52387_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:30.07 +02:10:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52388_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52390_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52390_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:24.90 +02:04:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52391_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52391_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:43.63 -05:22:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52396_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52396_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:14.53 +01:19:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52403_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52403_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:40.62 -06:10:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52407_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52407_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52411_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52411_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:43.11 -06:18:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52418_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52418_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:30.64 -06:19:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52429_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:21.59 -05:45:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52453_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52453_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:10.35 -06:32:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52461_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:17.47 -05:08:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52464_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:52.58 -06:04:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52470_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52470_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:05.41 -05:46:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52493_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52493_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:24:57.43 -02:38:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52494_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52494_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:09.26 -05:49:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52509_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52509_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52529_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:45.16 -05:38:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52530_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:57.29 -06:03:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52549_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:59.25 -06:08:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52580_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52580_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:01.27 -05:46:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52592_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:52.51 -06:30:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52594_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52594_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:32.11 -06:13:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52596_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52596_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:36.79 -06:11:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52628_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:51.04 -06:01:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 52635_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52636_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52636_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:00.12 -06:17:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 52644_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52647_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:32.54 -06:17:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52650_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:00.97 -06:32:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52652_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:39.95 -06:12:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52680_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:30.14 -06:02:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52687_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:09.91 -05:43:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52697_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:44.41 -06:14:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52700_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52700_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:46.21 -06:21:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52719_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52757_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:41.71 -06:23:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52782_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52782_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:41.44 -05:26:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52791_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:26.40 -06:19:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52809_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52822_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52822_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 52823_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52825_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52825_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:52.06 -06:30:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52826_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:16.05 -06:18:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52827_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52827_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:38.87 -06:06:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52852_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:48.03 -06:15:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52863_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:02.74 -06:03:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 52885_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52889_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52889_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:43.57 -06:25:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52912_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52912_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:57.60 -05:42:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52916_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52916_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:26.78 -05:41:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 52929_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52968_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:56.88 -06:18:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52983_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52983_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:52.47 -06:10:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 52995_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:49.83 -05:42:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53007_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53007_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:50.75 -05:51:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53017_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:24.56 -06:26:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 53032_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53041_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:41.91 -05:53:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53051_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 53051_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53063_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53063_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:19.73 -05:55:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53080_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53085_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:44.04 +02:19:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53087_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53087_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53120_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53120_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:47.86 -05:57:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53128_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53128_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53139_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53139_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:56.31 -06:05:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53146_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53219_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53219_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:58.17 -05:36:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53261_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53285_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 53285_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53332_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53332_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53350_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 53350_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21269_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 21269_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:52.15 -06:22:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17703_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 17703_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21463_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 21463_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:56.39 -05:12:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24484_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059
The candidate 24484_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_22-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059 did not pass the final checks