This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.3582 2461231.8582 12.64 20:51:04.18 +04:35:06.7
51.94726 -23.94646 galactic Del Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.397 Vienna 0 -0 0 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:51:04.18 +04:35:06.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:51:04.18 +04:35:06.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.3582* 20 51 04.18 +04 35 06.7 12.6 U Del 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.8582,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.3582 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.3582 2461231.8582 13.12 20:46:23.14 +05:05:53.3
51.73969 -22.68621 galactic Del Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.456 Abnoba -0 -0 1 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:46:23.14 +05:05:53.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:46:23.14 +05:05:53.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.3582* 20 46 23.14 +05 05 53.3 13.1 U Del 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.8582,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.3582 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.3582 2461231.8582 13.07 20:35:20.67 +06:39:25.3
51.59248 -19.53183 galactic Del Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.273 Atropos 1 0 1 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:35:20.67 +06:39:25.3: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:35:20.67 +06:39:25.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.3582* 20 35 20.67 +06 39 25.3 13.1 U Del 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.8582,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.3582 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.3582 2461231.8582 14.37 20:31:27.85 +08:36:48.9
52.80435 -17.67886 galactic Del Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1712 Angola -0 -0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:31:27.85 +08:36:48.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:31:27.85 +08:36:48.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.3582* 20 31 27.85 +08 36 48.9 14.4 U Del 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.8582,14.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.3582 14.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.3582 2461231.8582 12.35 20:23:39.16 +08:32:48.9
51.68025 -16.07379 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J2023391+083249
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.270 R1 Y 0.525 R1 165.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:23:39.16 +08:32:48.9: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:23:39.16 +08:32:48.9: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2023391+083249,2461231.8582,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2023391+083249 20260710.3582 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.3582 2461231.8582 13.27 20:23:06.70 +10:05:35.5
52.97326 -15.14749 galactic Del Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 11376366
Type: SR|L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.356 R1 12.955 R1 2451466.18000 108.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:23:06.70 +10:05:35.5: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:23:06.70 +10:05:35.5: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.3582* 20 23 06.70 +10 05 35.5 13.3 U Del 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 11376366,2461231.8582,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 11376366 20260710.3582 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.86770318 18.06.2026 08:49:19.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
First image: 2461209.86770318 18.06.2026 08:49:19.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Last image: 2461231.85853440 10.07.2026 08:36:07.372 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19222
Objects passed selection criteria: 19157
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14734
Average stars matched: 13775.2 (93.4929 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 123932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 04:36:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.86770318 18.06.2026 08:49:19.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
First image: 2461209.86770318 18.06.2026 08:49:19.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Last image: 2461231.85853440 10.07.2026 08:36:07.372 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 126
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 191 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 138094
Objects passed selection criteria: 137762
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107998
Average stars matched: 100412 (92.976 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1957960 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 04:42:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461231.85791332
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits'
wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits'
wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.136 +06:00:43.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.787 +06:00:00.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.136 +06:00:43.84
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.787 +06:00:00.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0139 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:15.401 +06:00:43.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.136 +06:00:43.84
Second-epoch image center 20:34:15.401 +06:00:43.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.787 +06:00:00.28
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:15.401 +06:00:43.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01554 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WdKXyME2cw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tZOrLqu0Lc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ht3iOskuyX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L5w5XL7gD2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits) and catalog (wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5937 to 316.5006 deg, Dec +0.7231 to +11.2735 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5937 to 316.5006 deg, Dec 0.7231 to 11.2735 deg
Loaded 13963 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11317 out of 12049 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12049 out of 21827 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.750800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.750800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5937 to 316.5006 deg, Dec +0.7231 to +11.2735 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5937 to 316.5006 deg, Dec 0.7231 to 11.2735 deg
Loaded 13963 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11317 out of 12049 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12049 out of 21827 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 21856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5976 to 316.4992 deg, Dec +0.7313 to +11.2814 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5976 to 316.4992 deg, Dec 0.7313 to 11.2814 deg
Loaded 13958 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11269 out of 12016 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12016 out of 21856 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
2.3 pix Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
2.6 pix fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
2.7 pix fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
15.1 mag. Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WdKXyME2cw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1622, bad_region=4013, passed=21827
Got 21827 stars (including 16388 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21827 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=298 n_q2=185 n_q3=289 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.022
The image catalog is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tZOrLqu0Lc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits' -> 'wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1650, bad_region=4048, passed=21856
Got 21856 stars (including 16355 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21856 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=301 n_q2=185 n_q3=285 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits -region wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ht3iOskuyX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=964, bad_region=4554, passed=16212
Got 16212 stars (including 11002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16212 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.596 n_q1=283 n_q2=205 n_q3=256 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.395
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits -region wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L5w5XL7gD2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=4627, passed=16616
Got 16616 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16616 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.598 n_q1=292 n_q2=208 n_q3=258 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.022
ref2=Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.083
new1=fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits sigma_overall=0.427 worst_q_ratio=1.395
new2=fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.330
reference average sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.0525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Del-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:37:43.45 +06:11:02.3: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:36:34.93 +06:47:28.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:37:43.45 +06:11:02.3: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:36:34.93 +06:47:28.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:43.45 +06:11:02.3: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1080 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:34.93 +06:47:28.0: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9854 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30984_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 30984_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30985_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 30985_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:50.14 +04:33:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32172_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 32172_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:54.02 +07:34:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32839_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 32839_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:35.20 +07:50:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32879_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 32879_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:09.67 +06:26:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32905_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 32905_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:38.58 +06:10:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33208_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 33208_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:18.63 +03:43:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33283_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 33283_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33404_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 33404_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:39.93 +10:04:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17885_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 17885_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:26.89 +09:34:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Del-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.136 +06:00:43.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.787 +06:00:00.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.136 +06:00:43.84
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.787 +06:00:00.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0139 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:15.401 +06:00:43.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.136 +06:00:43.84
Second-epoch image center 20:34:15.401 +06:00:43.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.787 +06:00:00.28
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:15.401 +06:00:43.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01554 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VaKyxkYI7X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mBFDLoeGMg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cFZta0eoTS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ihkgqYDsXZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits) and catalog (wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 152794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5811 to 316.5006 deg, Dec +0.7222 to +11.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5811 to 316.5006 deg, Dec 0.7222 to 11.2791 deg
Loaded 13995 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9716 out of 12424 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12424 out of 152794 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.603400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.603400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 152794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5811 to 316.5006 deg, Dec +0.7222 to +11.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5811 to 316.5006 deg, Dec 0.7222 to 11.2791 deg
Loaded 13995 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9716 out of 12424 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12424 out of 152794 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 153261 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5899 to 316.5088 deg, Dec +0.7242 to +11.2823 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5899 to 316.5088 deg, Dec 0.7242 to 11.2823 deg
Loaded 13992 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9666 out of 12406 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12406 out of 153261 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
2.2 pix Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
2.5 pix fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
2.4 pix fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
15.3 mag. Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VaKyxkYI7X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=16651, bad_region=18815, passed=152772
Got 152772 stars (including 118879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 152772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 136601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 136601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 136601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=303 n_q2=196 n_q3=272 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.033
The image catalog is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mBFDLoeGMg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits' -> 'wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=16741, bad_region=18900, passed=153237
Got 153237 stars (including 119194 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153237 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 136718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 136718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 136718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=305 n_q2=198 n_q3=268 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits -region wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cFZta0eoTS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=10153, bad_region=21581, passed=103342
Got 103342 stars (including 75569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 103342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.643 n_q1=294 n_q2=190 n_q3=280 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.427
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits -region wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ihkgqYDsXZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=10725, bad_region=22018, passed=106532
Got 106532 stars (including 77897 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 106532 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.665 n_q1=310 n_q2=195 n_q3=266 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.515
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-35-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0358.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Del-02-Q2b1x1_042104_TTUQ2b1x1_349154_jLEfYeWd/wcs_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Del-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:40:36.82 +02:38:42.8: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:40:59.15 +01:55:00.5: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:49:29.55 +07:57:29.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:20:15.30 +04:32:58.8: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:39:37.10 +04:25:05.5: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:31:33.17 +09:31:21.4: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:28:49.75 +02:41:29.5: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:39:44.77 +04:27:12.5: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:31:24.38 +03:15:57.6: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:49:43.04 +09:57:43.4: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:40:59.15 +01:55:00.5: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:40:36.82 +02:38:42.8: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:59.15 +01:55:00.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8685 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:36.82 +02:38:42.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4762 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:49:29.55 +07:57:29.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:29.55 +07:57:29.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0530 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:39:37.10 +04:25:05.5: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:37.10 +04:25:05.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4540 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:28:49.75 +02:41:29.5: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:49.75 +02:41:29.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4662 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:31:33.17 +09:31:21.4: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:20:15.30 +04:32:58.8: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:39:44.77 +04:27:12.5: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:31:24.38 +03:15:57.6: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:33.17 +09:31:21.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1484 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:49:43.04 +09:57:43.4: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:44.77 +04:27:12.5: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0434 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:15.30 +04:32:58.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0329 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:24.38 +03:15:57.6: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6553 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:43.04 +09:57:43.4: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0457 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:48:03.73 +01:59:44.2: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:47:16.17 +02:47:16.7: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:18:28.79 +02:46:10.2: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:39:20.40 +08:15:07.6: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:40:46.04 +07:35:33.7: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:49:02.04 +09:22:25.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:51:04.18 +04:35:06.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:48:03.73 +01:59:44.2: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:47:16.17 +02:47:16.7: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:03.73 +01:59:44.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8971 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:16.17 +02:47:16.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8326 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:39:20.40 +08:15:07.6: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:18:28.79 +02:46:10.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:40:46.04 +07:35:33.7: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:20.40 +08:15:07.6: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7080 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:28.79 +02:46:10.2: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5267 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:49:02.04 +09:22:25.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:46.04 +07:35:33.7: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0697 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:02.04 +09:22:25.6: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3072 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:46:23.14 +05:05:53.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:51:04.18 +04:35:06.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:35:20.67 +06:39:25.3: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:46:23.14 +05:05:53.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:27:05.28 +09:04:21.6: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:35:20.67 +06:39:25.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:24:24.85 +02:55:38.1: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:39:56.84 +08:45:03.1: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:50:44.34 +02:55:56.4: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:39:53.89 +08:27:12.3: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:27:05.28 +09:04:21.6: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:48:19.90 +03:52:45.0: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:24:24.85 +02:55:38.1: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:05.28 +09:04:21.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4569 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:24.85 +02:55:38.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5798 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:39:56.84 +08:45:03.1: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:56.84 +08:45:03.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4598 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:50:44.34 +02:55:56.4: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:44.34 +02:55:56.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5212 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:39:53.89 +08:27:12.3: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:53.89 +08:27:12.3: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5575 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:48:19.90 +03:52:45.0: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:19.90 +03:52:45.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7677 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:49:18.87 +03:50:32.7: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:27:06.27 +09:04:31.8: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:39:43.39 +04:57:40.8: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:38:38.10 +02:31:57.6: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:27:53.03 +09:56:56.4: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:49:18.87 +03:50:32.7: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:18.87 +03:50:32.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6696 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:27:06.27 +09:04:31.8: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:50:56.88 +02:27:09.2: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:06.27 +09:04:31.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6335 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:39:43.39 +04:57:40.8: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:43.39 +04:57:40.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6373 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:38:38.10 +02:31:57.6: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:38.10 +02:31:57.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7644 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:46:45.13 +02:28:06.4: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:50:56.88 +02:27:09.2: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:27:53.03 +09:56:56.4: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:56.88 +02:27:09.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8079 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.03 +09:56:56.4: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7304 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:46:45.13 +02:28:06.4: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:45.13 +02:28:06.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8728 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:47:37.74 +03:01:38.5: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:26:12.13 +09:27:44.3: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:47:37.74 +03:01:38.5: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:19:45.11 +09:19:31.4: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:37.74 +03:01:38.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7934 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:31:51.47 +09:35:22.1: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:38:32.13 +08:56:39.2: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:26:12.13 +09:27:44.3: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:12.13 +09:27:44.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7982 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:20:44.74 +03:02:17.7: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:19:45.11 +09:19:31.4: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:45.11 +09:19:31.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8109 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:31:51.47 +09:35:22.1: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:51.47 +09:35:22.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8664 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:38:32.13 +08:56:39.2: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:32.13 +08:56:39.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8028 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:40:50.07 +03:18:17.3: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:20:44.74 +03:02:17.7: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:44.74 +03:02:17.7: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9477 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:36:44.08 +08:34:52.5: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:34:44.80 +01:47:29.9: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:40:50.07 +03:18:17.3: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:50.07 +03:18:17.3: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1078 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:38:53.06 +08:36:09.5: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:42:24.16 +05:48:08.3: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:36:44.08 +08:34:52.5: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:45:41.72 +08:37:00.4: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:44.08 +08:34:52.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8559 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:34:44.80 +01:47:29.9: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:44.80 +01:47:29.9: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7888 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:38:53.06 +08:36:09.5: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:53.06 +08:36:09.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0457 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:42:24.16 +05:48:08.3: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:51:21.44 +06:31:50.2: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:24.16 +05:48:08.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9627 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:45:41.72 +08:37:00.4: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:41.72 +08:37:00.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0353 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:42:49.01 +02:32:47.8: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:51:21.44 +06:31:50.2: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:21.44 +06:31:50.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0267 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:50:44.21 +02:24:03.0: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:40:38.58 +04:35:18.8: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:42:49.01 +02:32:47.8: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:49.01 +02:32:47.8: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2390 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:42:24.39 +03:22:20.6: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:30:18.02 +09:21:15.4: 14.34 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:25:30.24 +05:16:45.2: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:50:44.21 +02:24:03.0: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:44.21 +02:24:03.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1815 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:40:38.58 +04:35:18.8: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:38.58 +04:35:18.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2241 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:42:24.39 +03:22:20.6: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:50:23.32 +02:31:43.9: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:30:18.02 +09:21:15.4: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:24.39 +03:22:20.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2142 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:18.02 +09:21:15.4: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2124 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:25:30.24 +05:16:45.2: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:30.24 +05:16:45.2: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1278 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:31:27.85 +08:36:48.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:50:23.32 +02:31:43.9: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:23.32 +02:31:43.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2575 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:41:55.16 +06:24:07.9: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:52:13.05 +07:55:35.2: 15.79 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:31:27.85 +08:36:48.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:48:03.48 +05:08:29.0: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:36:34.52 +09:00:15.2: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:33:07.03 +03:02:59.9: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:41:55.16 +06:24:07.9: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:55.16 +06:24:07.9: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4931 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:52:13.05 +07:55:35.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.79 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:52:13.05 +07:55:35.2: ref_mag=15.79 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=14.4064 delta=1.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:38:30.50 +07:55:11.0: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:48:03.48 +05:08:29.0: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:03.48 +05:08:29.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3198 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:36:34.52 +09:00:15.2: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:34.52 +09:00:15.2: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5968 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:33:07.03 +03:02:59.9: 14.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:07.03 +03:02:59.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6583 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:38:30.50 +07:55:11.0: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:30.50 +07:55:11.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7066 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:42:40.50 +05:11:41.0: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:37:00.61 +08:33:28.3: 14.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:42:40.50 +05:11:41.0: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:40.50 +05:11:41.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6501 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:37:00.61 +08:33:28.3: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:00.61 +08:33:28.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7424 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:23:21.68 +05:21:00.8: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:23:21.68 +05:21:00.8: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:23:39.16 +08:32:48.9: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:21.68 +05:21:00.8: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3942 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:23:06.70 +10:05:35.5: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:23:39.16 +08:32:48.9: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:23:06.70 +10:05:35.5: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:23:39.16 +08:32:48.9: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3494 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:23:06.70 +10:05:35.5: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2736 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 20:23:35.38 +09:56:30.4: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-18_03-49-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0349.fits at 20:23:35.38 +09:56:30.4: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:35.38 +09:56:30.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8452 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out189695.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107226.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118138.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178651.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out180292.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out180522.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out188625.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174749_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174749_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174750_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174750_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174752_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174752_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174765_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174765_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174783_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174783_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174787_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174787_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174788_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174788_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174791_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174791_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174793_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174793_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174800_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174800_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174801_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174801_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174803_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174803_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:46.88 +05:28:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174807_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174807_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174812_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174812_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174819_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174819_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174826_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174826_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174835_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 174835_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176753_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 176753_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:19.32 +09:54:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176997_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 176997_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:58.63 +04:01:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177747_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 177747_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:19.24 +05:20:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178651_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
Preparing report for the candidate 178651_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179035_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 179035_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:33:51.57 +10:04:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179704_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 179704_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:27.58 +10:05:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180292_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
Preparing report for the candidate 180292_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180481_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 180481_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:04.59 +04:53:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180522_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
Preparing report for the candidate 180522_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180663_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 180663_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:40.02 +06:43:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181303_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 181303_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:25.58 +05:15:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181304_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 181304_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:52.64 +01:51:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181454_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 181454_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:42:07.49 +03:42:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182205_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 182205_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182313_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 182313_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:41.94 +08:00:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182318_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 182318_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182454_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 182454_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182577_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 182577_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182974_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 182974_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:50:27.85 +04:55:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183145_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 183145_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183233_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 183233_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183270_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 183270_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:42:03.32 +02:59:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183289_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 183289_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183387_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 183387_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183795_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 183795_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183838_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 183838_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184010_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 184010_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184082_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 184082_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:33:54.73 +10:02:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184093_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 184093_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184365_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 184365_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184580_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 184580_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:28.67 +04:52:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184757_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 184757_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184764_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 184764_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185386_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 185386_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185420_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 185420_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185601_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 185601_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185766_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 185766_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:24:55.65 +09:10:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185959_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 185959_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185982_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 185982_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186022_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 186022_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186111_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 186111_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186253_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 186253_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186371_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 186371_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186731_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 186731_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186788_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 186788_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187103_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 187103_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187146_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 187146_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187234_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 187234_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187350_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 187350_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187778_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 187778_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188024_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 188024_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188139_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 188139_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188625_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
Preparing report for the candidate 188625_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189438_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 189438_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189695_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 189695_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:13.05 +07:55:35.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.465 1749792117596103424 313.05429512941 +07.92654668524 14.1125 13.6751 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.465#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189884_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 189884_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189994_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 189994_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190078_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 190078_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190303_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 190303_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190305_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 190305_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190488_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 190488_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76557_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 76557_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:17.58 +06:30:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98253_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 98253_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:35.22 +07:50:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115633_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 115633_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:14.75 +10:16:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58617_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 58617_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71340_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 71340_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:38.61 +06:10:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125889_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 125889_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:26.89 +09:34:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125391_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 125391_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:03.90 +09:36:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107226_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
Preparing report for the candidate 107226_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118138_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
Preparing report for the candidate 118138_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83629_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 83629_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:03.24 +06:58:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94184_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 94184_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:54.01 +07:34:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116989_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 116989_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:27.65 +10:10:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120653_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359
The candidate 120653_fd_Del-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-10_03-36-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0359 did not pass the final checks
