This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.2824 2461231.7824 12.19 20:13:19.81 -13:40:12.5
29.45160 -24.21952 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix 0 -1 1 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:19.81 -13:40:12.5: 14.12 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:13:19.81 -13:40:12.5: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.2824* 20 13 19.81 -13 40 12.5 12.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.7824,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.2824 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.2824 2461231.7824 13.70 20:13:39.11 -17:13:55.0
25.87255 -25.69078 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1245 Calvinia 1 -1 2 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:39.11 -17:13:55.0: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:13:39.11 -17:13:55.0: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.2824* 20 13 39.11 -17 13 55.0 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.7824,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.2824 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.2824 2461231.7824 13.77 20:24:38.02 -15:51:31.9
28.42010 -27.59529 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1819 Laputa -0 -1 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:38.02 -15:51:31.9: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:24:38.02 -15:51:31.9: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.2824* 20 24 38.02 -15 51 31.9 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.7824,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.2824 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.2824 2461231.7824 11.39 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.1
30.35268 -24.27661 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" RX Cap
Type: RV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.950 V 12.700 V 2420741.40000 67.920000000000 F8-G0
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.1: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.1: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 10.2824* 20 14 55.21 -12 56 35.1 11.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RX Cap,2461231.7824,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RX Cap 20260710.2824 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461231.78268730 10.07.2026 06:46:54.183 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10159
Objects passed selection criteria: 10141
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8593.25
Average stars matched: 8401.75 (97.7715 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117572 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 06:33:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461208.89012170 17.06.2026 09:21:36.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461231.78268730 10.07.2026 06:46:54.183 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 38
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 71759
Objects passed selection criteria: 71627
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61585
Average stars matched: 59444.8 (96.5247 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1857512 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 06:36:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461231.78217655
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:29.378 -17:59:12.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:29.378 -17:59:12.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0512 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:30.220 -17:59:30.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:30.220 -17:59:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0460 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:29.378 -17:59:12.69
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:30.220 -17:59:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00596 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6g2Lp4K8eR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LVAG79xqIe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QnX7Soy9pe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F7FgxJNCbf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2410 to 315.1296 deg, Dec -23.2670 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6582 out of 6781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6781 out of 10504 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2184 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2671 to -12.6728 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2184 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2671 to -12.6728 deg
Loaded 8299 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6584 out of 6783 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6783 out of 10456 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6g2Lp4K8eR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=584, bad_region=0, passed=10504
Got 10504 stars (including 9908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=215 n_q2=286 n_q3=220 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LVAG79xqIe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=591, bad_region=0, passed=10452
Got 10452 stars (including 9856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=218 n_q2=289 n_q3=217 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QnX7Soy9pe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=321, bad_region=0, passed=6712
Got 6712 stars (including 6389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=243 n_q2=225 n_q3=255 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F7FgxJNCbf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, bad_region=0, passed=6903
Got 6903 stars (including 6570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6903 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=242 n_q2=228 n_q3=256 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.128
ref2=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.148
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.157
reference average sigma_overall=0.444 worst_q_ratio=1.138
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.2: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.2: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3896 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20636.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20636_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 20636_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.504 6879691160336671744 303.73003527948 -12.94297129150 11.3754 10.6474 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.504#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20676_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 20676_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:38.55 -13:56:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:29.378 -17:59:12.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:29.378 -17:59:12.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0512 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:30.220 -17:59:30.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.784 -18:00:39.13
Second-epoch image center 20:26:30.220 -17:59:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0460 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:29.378 -17:59:12.69
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:30.220 -17:59:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00596 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r331jjEtxs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oIbMgZNpaU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TXex9akFEg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S15VnCrqy6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76668 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6610 out of 7336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7336 out of 76668 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.552300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.552300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76668 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2135 to 315.1318 deg, Dec -23.2769 to -12.6250 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6610 out of 7336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7336 out of 76668 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 76873 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2034 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2844 to -12.6291 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2034 to 315.1298 deg, Dec -23.2844 to -12.6291 deg
Loaded 8377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6585 out of 7338 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7338 out of 76873 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
14.9 mag. Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.r331jjEtxs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4300, bad_region=1, passed=76649
Got 76649 stars (including 72232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76649 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=226 n_q2=279 n_q3=217 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oIbMgZNpaU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=4343, bad_region=0, passed=76851
Got 76851 stars (including 72409 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=230 n_q2=282 n_q3=213 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TXex9akFEg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1744, bad_region=2, passed=46732
Got 46732 stars (including 44919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46732 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=234 n_q2=223 n_q3=255 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S15VnCrqy6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1783, bad_region=2, passed=47811
Got 47811 stars (including 45956 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47811 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=235 n_q2=230 n_q3=256 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-10_CI_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_020954_TTUQ1b1x1_2119581_U6fo59lj/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:23.14 -16:20:12.2: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:36.19 -15:22:30.5: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:05:24.53 -12:52:25.0: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:40.49 -19:24:21.2: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:37:18.72 -17:33:58.3: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:11:59.34 -15:42:23.8: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:18:18.85 -15:44:54.0: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:26:51.15 -14:10:41.8: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:56:55.73 -19:12:52.3: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:58:23.14 -16:20:12.2: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:23.14 -16:20:12.2: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1631 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:19.81 -13:40:12.5: 14.12 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:58:40.49 -19:24:21.2: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:58:36.19 -15:22:30.5: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:37:18.72 -17:33:58.3: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:05:24.53 -12:52:25.0: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:40.49 -19:24:21.2: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3274 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:36.19 -15:22:30.5: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6960 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:18.72 -17:33:58.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5892 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:24.53 -12:52:25.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4674 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:26:51.15 -14:10:41.8: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:11:59.34 -15:42:23.8: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:18:18.85 -15:44:54.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:56:55.73 -19:12:52.3: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:51.15 -14:10:41.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8228 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:59.34 -15:42:23.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8751 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:18.85 -15:44:54.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3226 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:55.73 -19:12:52.3: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7312 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:13:19.81 -13:40:12.5: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:13:19.81 -13:40:12.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.1829 delta=2.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:21.46 -13:36:04.8: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:03:38.57 -15:24:39.5: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:58:38.89 -15:22:23.0: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:16:20.12 -20:01:34.6: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:55:53.37 -18:51:44.9: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:38.38 -19:38:17.5: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:58:03.33 -12:44:49.9: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:58:21.46 -13:36:04.8: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:21.46 -13:36:04.8: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9413 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:03:38.57 -15:24:39.5: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:38.57 -15:24:39.5: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7633 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:56:46.44 -16:36:03.0: 13.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:58:38.89 -15:22:23.0: 12.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:16:20.12 -20:01:34.6: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:38.89 -15:22:23.0: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4986 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:20.12 -20:01:34.6: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0280 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:35:18.79 -13:34:36.2: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 19:55:53.37 -18:51:44.9: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:57:38.38 -19:38:17.5: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:53.37 -18:51:44.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1157 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:38.38 -19:38:17.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5214 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 19:58:03.33 -12:44:49.9: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:03.33 -12:44:49.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9972 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 19:56:46.44 -16:36:03.0: 13.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:46.44 -16:36:03.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3250 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:35:18.79 -13:34:36.2: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:18.79 -13:34:36.2: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3397 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:59:00.73 -13:17:32.6: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:01:20.03 -15:04:01.1: 13.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:26:00.50 -15:25:04.4: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:13:39.11 -17:13:55.0: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:19:48.84 -14:16:01.6: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:56:22.50 -13:19:00.4: 14.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 19:59:00.73 -13:17:32.6: 13.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:00.73 -13:17:32.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6804 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:24:38.02 -15:51:31.9: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:01:20.03 -15:04:01.1: 13.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:26:00.50 -15:25:04.4: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:20.03 -15:04:01.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5532 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:00.50 -15:25:04.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5286 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 19:57:27.15 -13:13:38.2: 14.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:57:20.94 -13:15:57.7: 14.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:19:48.84 -14:16:01.6: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 19:56:22.50 -13:19:00.4: 14.48 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:48.84 -14:16:01.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6218 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:13:39.11 -17:13:55.0: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:22.50 -13:19:00.4: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1112 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:24:38.02 -15:51:31.9: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 19:57:27.15 -13:13:38.2: 14.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:27.15 -13:13:38.2: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1852 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:57:20.94 -13:15:57.7: 14.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:20.94 -13:15:57.7: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8855 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:15:16.75 -13:42:26.7: 15.08 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:11:03.27 -13:19:00.2: 13.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-21-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits at 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.1: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:15:16.75 -13:42:26.7: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:16.75 -13:42:26.7: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.2452 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:11:03.27 -13:19:00.2: 14.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:03.27 -13:19:00.2: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1137 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-22-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits at 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.1: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:14:55.21 -12:56:35.1: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3893 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out44954.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93599.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94635.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94673.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93285_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93285_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93290_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93290_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93295_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93295_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93298_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93298_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93299_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93299_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93300_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93300_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93301_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93301_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93303_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93303_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93304_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93304_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93390_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93390_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:48.86 -12:44:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93599_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
Preparing report for the candidate 93599_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93630_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93630_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93668_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93668_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:12.38 -14:47:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93847_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93847_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93861_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93861_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93880_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 93880_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:31.58 -15:16:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94005_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94005_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94050_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94050_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94149_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94149_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94167_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94167_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94219_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94219_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94301_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94301_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94360_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94360_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94402_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94402_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:04:27.31 -14:42:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94449_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94449_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94471_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94471_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94496_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94496_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94635_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
Preparing report for the candidate 94635_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94667_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94667_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94673_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
Preparing report for the candidate 94673_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94750_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94750_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94816_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94816_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94903_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 94903_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47955_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231
The candidate 47955_fd_Cap-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-10_01-46-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0231 did not pass the final checks