NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 687981 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 687981 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1331.0772 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 411.9188 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1324.2083 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 421.9214 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.49676 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.024 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 29.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-09T23:34:13.8549595' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-10T04:34:13.8549595' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61231.1904381248 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-10T04:34:23.7579222' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61231.1905527432 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.999532359314 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9995580406844 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 25.0083333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 339.139722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.35495706278603 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 31.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 29.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits :) Spent 0.756414 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 29.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-09T23:34:56.3106413' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-10T04:34:56.3106413' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61231.1909295139 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-10T04:35:06.2140366' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61231.1910441434 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.999532399945 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9995580816581 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 24.9563888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 339.173611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.35949231401787 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 31.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 29.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits :) Spent 0.882027 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461231.69055387 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:31.120 +69:59:43.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:31.120 +69:59:43.33 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0170 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:31.404 +69:59:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:31.404 +69:59:37.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0167 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:31.120 +69:59:43.33 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:31.404 +69:59:37.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00163 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00163 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q29AEff6Sn Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L6TDl89wAm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eDcYbkdpHf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tIGfrmb76a Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec +62.9087 to +75.4796 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec 62.9087 to 75.4796 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5136 out of 5418 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5418 out of 8894 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Q29AEff6Sn (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8779 Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=198 n_q2=294 n_q3=212 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.L6TDl89wAm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, bad_region=0, passed=8894 Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=199 n_q2=283 n_q3=224 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eDcYbkdpHf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=174, bad_region=0, passed=3858 Got 3858 stars (including 3680 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3858 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3777 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3777 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3777 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=207 n_q2=226 n_q3=262 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.tIGfrmb76a (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=193, bad_region=0, passed=4044 Got 4044 stars (including 3844 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4044 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=181 n_q2=245 n_q3=278 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.330 ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.274 new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.246 new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.318 reference average sigma_overall=0.3945 worst_q_ratio=1.302 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    9.80    08:04:00.08 +73:24:29.5   8866 0600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:04:00.10 +73:24:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    9.74    10:55:39.99 +71:52:07.3   1238 1242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 10:55:40.01 +71:52:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    6.78    10:44:37.56 +68:46:32.9   1103 3196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 10:44:37.68 +68:46:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:31.120 +69:59:43.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:31.120 +69:59:43.33 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0170 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:31.404 +69:59:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:31.404 +69:59:37.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0167 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:31.120 +69:59:43.33 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:31.404 +69:59:37.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00163 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00163 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zf7tRaPndy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qy3bVos8ZE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mUlb3R9tVt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r7Ygn9qC6n Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec +62.8134 to +75.4919 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec 62.8134 to 75.4919 deg Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4857 out of 5495 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5495 out of 51887 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 30 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.2 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 14.2 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.zf7tRaPndy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, bad_region=3, passed=51519 Got 51519 stars (including 48797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51060 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51061 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=207 n_q2=283 n_q3=214 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Qy3bVos8ZE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, bad_region=5, passed=51863 Got 51863 stars (including 49074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51368 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=214 n_q2=275 n_q3=217 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.mUlb3R9tVt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=603, bad_region=0, passed=21609 Got 21609 stars (including 20968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21609 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21005 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21006 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21006 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=207 n_q2=220 n_q3=261 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.r7Ygn9qC6n (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=775, bad_region=0, passed=22732 Got 22732 stars (including 21922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22732 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=187 n_q2=240 n_q3=276 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.357 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:11:31.60 +64:32:32.6: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:19:59.39 +65:04:58.5: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:11:31.60 +64:32:32.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:31.60 +64:32:32.6: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0016 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:19:59.39 +65:04:58.5: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:59.39 +65:04:58.5: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0356 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65382_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65382_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.03    08:24:41.93 +66:01:01.1   9042 5220   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:24:41.85 +66:01:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65383_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65383_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.10    08:23:49.45 +65:14:30.8   9209 5670   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:23:49.34 +65:14:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65438_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65438_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    10.44    10:25:00.87 +64:04:46.0   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65440_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65440_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    10.30    08:22:25.25 +64:41:15.6   9380 5979   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:22:25.22 +64:41:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65486_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65486_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    10.88    09:17:48.38 +72:29:45.9   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65531_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65531_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    11.36    09:42:09.19 +65:29:06.5   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65563_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65563_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    11.44    09:50:09.60 +73:06:43.8   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65618_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65618_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    11.92    08:21:43.50 +64:44:19.0   9417 5938   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:21:43.42 +64:44:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65635_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65635_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    11.65    08:23:44.48 +72:20:23.4   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65661_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65661_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    12.12    09:54:55.99 +65:10:20.7   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65664_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65664_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    11.99    09:49:42.96 +72:09:44.0   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65868_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65868_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    12.65    09:12:36.30 +70:37:17.4   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65918_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65918_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    12.83    09:22:28.78 +74:54:37.9   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65952_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 65952_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 10.19055    2461231.69055    13.01    10:11:31.58 +64:32:32.6   2331 6194   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.00    10:11:31.62 +64:32:32.7   2332 6193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66021_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66021_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.15    09:55:39.16 +71:26:15.0   3930 2237   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66028_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66028_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    12.92    08:20:43.66 +64:56:39.8   9449 5801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:20:43.66 +64:56:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66037_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66037_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.00    08:21:53.31 +64:40:38.0   9416 5978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:21:53.31 +64:40:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66061_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66061_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.15    09:30:53.87 +67:08:45.7   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66067_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66067_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 10.19055    2461231.69055    13.00    08:19:59.42 +65:04:57.7   9474 5708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.08    08:19:59.36 +65:04:59.2   9474 5707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66075_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66075_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.02    08:23:01.81 +64:43:19.1   9336 5968   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:23:01.73 +64:43:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66204_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66204_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.28    08:26:07.64 +70:06:52.6   8386 2815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:26:07.50 +70:06:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66258_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66258_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.23    08:20:55.80 +64:47:01.6   9461 5899   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:20:55.92 +64:47:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66277_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66277_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    13.10    08:12:29.20 +68:27:39.3   9358 3599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:12:29.26 +68:27:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66501_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66501_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    14.00    09:21:09.56 +71:55:07.4   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66642_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 66642_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    14.35    10:03:35.97 +73:09:26.8   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 44723_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 44723_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    12.86    08:50:31.49 +67:26:25.3   7353 4642   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:50:31.58 +67:26:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    9.72    08:04:00.11 +73:24:29.5   8866 0600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:04:00.13 +73:24:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    9.98    10:55:39.88 +71:52:07.0   1238 1242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 10:55:39.94 +71:52:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61594_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 61594_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    12.86    08:25:34.79 +64:59:30.4   9134 5844   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 08:25:34.70 +64:59:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 10.19105    2461231.69105    7.17    10:44:37.56 +68:46:33.0   1103 3196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233600_TTUQ1b1x1_1480068_5jd4dFuf/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_23-34-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits **** FOUND 10:44:37.67 +68:46:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461231.69055387 -observatory V36 07:32:41.37 +17:08:27.1 Mercury (5.0mag) 10:10:58.17 +12:45:13.0 Venus (-4.1mag) 04:23:41.65 +21:23:59.2 Mars (1.3mag) 08:16:31.78 +20:11:56.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:49.83 +03:20:25.0 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:07:12.16 +20:44:58.4 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:17:01.52 +00:20:42.0 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:30:55.83 -23:17:56.3 Pluto (14.4mag) 03:00:13.05 +21:26:03.4 Moon (-9.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jul 9 23:46 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461231.69055387: 08:16:35.77 +20:11:43.8 Io (6.1mag) 08:16:31.79 +20:11:58.3 Europa (6.3mag) 08:16:48.15 +20:10:58.1 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:17:00.34 +20:10:11.4 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:15:03.71 +19:56:02.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:16:30.39 +20:12:02.8 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:14:25.09 +20:00:34.0 Elara (17.6mag) 08:20:03.69 +20:06:11.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:21:30.17 +20:17:00.2 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:39.33 +03:20:17.7 Titan (8.5mag) 00:55:44.73 +03:20:30.6 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:55:19.34 +03:19:35.8 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:55:59.64 +03:20:42.9 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:55:50.78 +03:17:40.2 Phoebe (16.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 9 23:46 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461231.69055387: 17:46:43.12 -33:02:41.1 JWST 15:52:48.21 +52:52:27.9 Chandra 19:36:44.69 +09:31:39.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 9 23:46 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461231.69055387 -observatory V36 02:36:02.30 +14:24:31.6 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:18:04.08 -34:21:28.8 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:25:30.70 -68:08:14.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:00:44.95 +32:26:39.2 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:03:09.80 +16:02:57.5 18.0mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 01:46:51.60 +07:53:36.1 15.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:59:37.63 +32:17:07.7 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:12:12.81 +26:55:39.5 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:55:22.46 +29:47:17.4 16.8mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:09:37.84 +04:59:45.7 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:07:19.08 +21:17:59.5 17.9mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:11:36.30 -11:23:03.2 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:49:25.74 +67:37:18.3 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:31:12.54 -10:03:40.9 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:00:22.16 +65:41:59.8 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:32:36.01 +29:59:42.3 14.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:16:24.36 +15:19:26.3 17.5mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:41:30.96 +39:21:39.4 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:47:44.90 +45:58:42.7 17.8mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:49:29.11 -13:48:12.0 15.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:34:26.21 +29:05:48.2 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:14:13.29 -12:52:32.3 16.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:55:54.27 +22:26:37.6 17.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:44:33.86 +03:56:40.5 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:52:25.61 +79:07:00.3 17.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:46:05.98 +45:13:56.5 16.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:25:24.53 +04:30:54.0 16.9mag A/2026 E1 21:18:47.68 -15:01:09.2 7.3mag 10P/Tempel 11:13:22.78 -01:52:49.5 16.1mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:59:56.20 +29:32:07.2 17.8mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:07:44.20 +14:03:46.6 17.0mag 63P/Wild 00:48:17.41 -05:05:42.6 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 08:26:26.66 +34:13:35.1 17.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 04:27:00.23 +20:10:11.7 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:22:04.07 +10:35:11.9 16.2mag 88P/Howell 06:35:02.62 +30:32:37.9 15.7mag 93P/Lovas 04:20:28.34 +31:06:55.5 16.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:08:17.77 +30:43:16.7 15.3mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:47:49.71 +01:15:10.3 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos 04:51:27.95 +20:48:29.1 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:35:56.83 +19:42:54.1 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 00:01:30.00 +02:55:43.3 17.9mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 07:12:57.34 +17:03:19.4 15.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:16:46.58 -21:07:09.9 15.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 05:32:28.63 +33:54:46.2 15.3mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:04:53.39 +14:59:06.1 14.7mag 169P/NEAT 01:40:38.41 +07:34:47.3 17.7mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:59.87 -08:22:45.7 17.0mag 235P/LINEAR 08:44:56.47 +33:18:51.7 17.9mag 240P/NEAT 20:42:15.05 -49:32:00.9 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 01:58:51.13 +12:01:07.5 15.7mag 260P/McNaught 05:36:43.96 +36:49:45.7 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:37.46 +06:04:16.2 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:34:27.44 +19:41:00.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:51:30.59 +39:13:46.7 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jul 9 23:46 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 2026-07-5.01 16.82 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 9 23:46 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 9 23:46 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 20:32:17.644 -16:37:51.49 AT 2026sqa 2026-07-07.33 21.6569 20:38:02.144 -16:39:15.94 AT 2026spz 2026-07-07.33 22.7762 20:36:24.191 -15:13:43.37 AT 2026spy 2026-07-07.33 22.1739 20:41:10.988 -25:49:45.49 AT 2026spx 2026-07-07.33 22.8645 21:17:15.336 -23:31:53.39 AT 2026spw 2026-07-07.32 21.9459 20:27:45.431 -19:59:58.81 AT 2026spv 2026-07-07.33 21.6485 21:55:34.604 -14:11:57.66 AT 2026spu 2026-07-07.39 23.0585 21:10:34.181 -22:59:24.76 AT 2026spt 2026-07-07.32 22.3526 21:05:55.405 -19:04:02.26 AT 2026sps 2026-07-07.32 21.4424 20:59:14.423 -27:33:25.12 AT 2026spr 2026-07-07.32 23.4151 20:31:34.503 -19:06:25.71 AT 2026spq 2026-07-07.33 22.7105 20:54:43.024 -26:43:41.99 AT 2026spp 2026-07-07.32 22.8017 21:07:49.748 -22:55:35.56 AT 2026spo 2026-07-07.32 22.494 20:57:55.962 -26:08:04.97 AT 2026spn 2026-07-07.32 22.7486 20:52:11.463 -28:17:09.07 AT 2026spm 2026-07-07.32 21.7705 21:10:07.376 -16:54:40.86 AT 2026spl 2026-07-07.32 22.4035 20:40:48.822 -16:22:21.53 AT 2026spk 2026-07-07.33 22.5822 12:31:52.422 +08:11:55.00 AT 2026spj 2026-07-07.05 22.147 21:57:34.362 -10:26:18.14 AT 2026spi 2026-07-07.39 22.5638 20:47:28.637 -25:46:50.92 AT 2026sph 2026-07-07.33 22.7363 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 9 23:46 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C