This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1774 2461231.6774 11.11 19:08:40.78 -27:31:35.4
9.62707 -15.66762 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 0 0 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:40.78 -27:31:35.4: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:40.78 -27:31:35.4: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.6774,11.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.1774 11.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1774 2461231.6774 11.28 19:16:57.21 -29:21:44.1
8.56839 -18.04478 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -4 -3 5 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:57.21 -29:21:44.1: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:16:57.21 -29:21:44.1: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.6774,11.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.1774 11.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1774 2461231.6774 11.31 18:48:28.23 -27:35:35.6
7.70755 -11.59516 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX24" [CAG2000] vs2f234
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.200 B Y 1.100 B 0.466320000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -0 -0 0 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:28.23 -27:35:35.6: 14.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:48:28.23 -27:35:35.6: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[CAG2000] vs2f234,2461231.6774,11.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[CAG2000] vs2f234 20260710.1774 11.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1774 2461231.6774 12.49 18:46:16.56 -28:32:45.4
6.61753 -11.55397 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa 0 1 1 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:16.56 -28:32:45.4: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:46:16.56 -28:32:45.4: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.6774,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.1774 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1774 2461231.6774 10.72 19:01:46.94 -23:43:09.5
12.58520 -12.72002 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J190147-2343.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.220 V Y 1.590 V 2452502.10000 236.486481000000 S3*3
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:46.94 -23:43:09.5: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:01:46.94 -23:43:09.5: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J190147-2343.2,2461231.6774,10.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J190147-2343.2 20260710.1774 10.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1774 2461231.6774 12.14 19:01:01.79 -24:40:44.9
11.61522 -12.95737 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 5 0 5 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:01.79 -24:40:44.9: 14.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:01:01.79 -24:40:44.9: 14.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461231.6774,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260710.1774 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 10.1774 2461231.6774 12.71 18:59:44.77 -27:19:37.2
9.00729 -13.76760 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V5834 Sgr
Type: SRD
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 V 14.500 V 2452115.00000 110.100000000000 K6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:44.77 -27:19:37.2: 14.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:44.77 -27:19:37.2: 13.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V5834 Sgr,2461231.6774,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V5834 Sgr 20260710.1774 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461231.67771304 10.07.2026 04:15:44.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7831
Objects passed selection criteria: 7814
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6444
Average stars matched: 6428.25 (99.7556 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115444 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 00:23:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461231.67771304 10.07.2026 04:15:44.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 184 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95100
Objects passed selection criteria: 94948
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 81704.8
Average stars matched: 80878 (98.9881 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1885132 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 10 00:33:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461231.67703388
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.112 -26:00:00.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.112 -26:00:00.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0039 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.934 -26:00:09.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.934 -26:00:09.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.112 -26:00:00.77
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:57.934 -26:00:09.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01217 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ChEY5AwnVT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2zrQuYEWjR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o51CPkHCuM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PERXFI5zrd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.547700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.547700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9591 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13383 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7396 out of 7628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7628 out of 9734 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ChEY5AwnVT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=2274, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 10138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=321 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2zrQuYEWjR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=677, bad_region=1820, passed=9734
Got 9734 stars (including 7369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.714 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=309 n_q2=152 n_q3=284 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o51CPkHCuM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, bad_region=756, passed=4343
Got 4343 stars (including 3313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4343 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=330 n_q2=140 n_q3=256 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PERXFI5zrd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, bad_region=764, passed=4228
Got 4228 stars (including 3195 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=334 n_q2=149 n_q3=245 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.371
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.555 worst_q_ratio=1.286
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits sigma_overall=0.535 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.215
reference average sigma_overall=0.5305 worst_q_ratio=1.3285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092_astrometric_residuals.png (928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 03218_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.14 -28:51:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20014_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 20014_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.82 -23:56:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20013_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 20013_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.78 -29:04:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20012_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 20012_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.45 -22:34:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.112 -26:00:00.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.112 -26:00:00.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0039 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.934 -26:00:09.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.934 -26:00:09.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.112 -26:00:00.77
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:57.934 -26:00:09.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01217 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BUBkgmZ3Hq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cAHapvasNy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z5bLv1SmSA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2j6mwwketH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.361800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.361800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 111498 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9098 to 297.0880 deg, Dec -31.2696 to -20.5364 deg
Loaded 13436 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9982 out of 11636 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11636 out of 111498 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BUBkgmZ3Hq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=17584, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 115576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=325 n_q2=171 n_q3=233 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.513
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cAHapvasNy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=8357, bad_region=13286, passed=111486
Got 111486 stars (including 90417 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111486 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.791 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=326 n_q2=172 n_q3=240 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.504
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z5bLv1SmSA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2422, bad_region=6546, passed=59102
Got 59102 stars (including 50300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59102 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=344 n_q2=145 n_q3=236 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2j6mwwketH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2245, bad_region=6584, passed=57313
Got 57313 stars (including 48621 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57313 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=347 n_q2=151 n_q3=226 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-14-45_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_233256_TTUQ2b1x1_1299097_mYqFAWMx/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:16.15 -27:14:25.7: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:38.57 -27:47:06.2: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:00.98 -24:18:01.1: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:13.07 -22:04:48.7: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:41.24 -27:46:03.0: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:29.19 -26:18:40.5: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:48.35 -29:57:46.8: 12.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:12.54 -29:42:33.6: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:59.27 -21:57:35.6: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:09:13.07 -22:04:48.7: 12.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:53:16.15 -27:14:25.7: 12.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:52:41.24 -27:46:03.0: 12.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:48.35 -29:57:46.8: 12.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:29.19 -26:18:40.5: 13.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:13.07 -22:04:48.7: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5254 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:16.15 -27:14:25.7: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9883 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:41.24 -27:46:03.0: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4300 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:12:59.27 -21:57:35.6: 12.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:48.35 -29:57:46.8: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4383 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:29.19 -26:18:40.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5280 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:59.27 -21:57:35.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7016 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:00.98 -24:18:01.1: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:54:38.57 -27:47:06.2: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:49:12.54 -29:42:33.6: 13.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:00.98 -24:18:01.1: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7578 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:38.57 -27:47:06.2: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7594 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:12.54 -29:42:33.6: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8298 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:38.80 -28:45:48.0: 10.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:57.21 -29:21:44.1: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:34.15 -27:29:49.9: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:28.23 -27:35:35.6: 14.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:40.78 -27:31:35.4: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:45:38.80 -28:45:48.0: 10.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:38.80 -28:45:48.0: ref_mag=10.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7381 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:16.56 -28:32:45.4: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:02.49 -28:08:06.0: 12.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:16:57.21 -29:21:44.1: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:34.15 -27:29:49.9: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:48:28.23 -27:35:35.6: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:48:28.23 -27:35:35.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=11.3148 delta=3.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:34.15 -27:29:49.9: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4773 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:40.78 -27:31:35.4: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:07.74 -28:31:10.6: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:50.04 -26:20:21.2: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:03.91 -23:56:23.8: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:46:16.56 -28:32:45.4: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:02.49 -28:08:06.0: 12.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:02.49 -28:08:06.0: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5646 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:42:07.74 -28:31:10.6: 12.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:07.74 -28:31:10.6: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5357 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:05:50.04 -26:20:21.2: 12.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:17:03.91 -23:56:23.8: 12.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:03.91 -23:56:23.8: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6689 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:50.04 -26:20:21.2: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6595 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:49.22 -24:26:02.0: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:08:49.22 -24:26:02.0: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:49.22 -24:26:02.0: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6552 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:43.05 -23:04:27.8: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:21:53.10 -24:23:12.9: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:16.27 -24:20:42.2: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:08.62 -29:30:08.4: 14.52 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:20:43.05 -23:04:27.8: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:43.05 -23:04:27.8: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8997 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:21:53.10 -24:23:12.9: 12.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:53.10 -24:23:12.9: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8464 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:56:16.27 -24:20:42.2: 14.45 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:56:16.27 -24:20:42.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=12.8644 delta=1.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:49.25 -25:03:34.1: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:03:08.62 -29:30:08.4: 14.51 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:03:08.62 -29:30:08.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=12.9677 delta=1.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:49.25 -25:03:34.1: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:49.25 -25:03:34.1: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8590 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:46.94 -23:43:09.5: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:01:46.94 -23:43:09.5: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:01:46.94 -23:43:09.5: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7251 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:01.79 -24:40:44.9: 14.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 19:01:01.79 -24:40:44.9: 14.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:01:01.79 -24:40:44.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.1421 delta=2.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:44.77 -27:19:37.2: 14.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-04-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 18:59:44.77 -27:19:37.2: 13.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:59:44.77 -27:19:37.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.7076 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out158785.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out158804.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out136846.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158687.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158691.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158740.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49206.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87556.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158607_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158607_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158631_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158631_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158640_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158640_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158648_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158648_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158651_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158651_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158653_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158653_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158657_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158657_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158658_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158658_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:27.59 -24:30:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158659_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158659_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158660_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158660_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158674_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158674_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:29.44 -27:30:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158685_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158685_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158687_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 158687_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158689_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 158689_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158691_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 158691_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158692_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158692_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158706_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158706_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:39.93 -22:22:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158710_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158710_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:25.33 -26:18:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158727_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158727_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:12.41 -24:52:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158732_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158732_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:24.86 -23:14:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158737_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158737_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.47 -22:42:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158738_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158738_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:24.83 -23:15:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158740_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 158740_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158742_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158742_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:43.96 -27:03:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158752_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158752_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:30.33 -25:48:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158753_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158753_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158754_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158754_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158756_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158756_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158757_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158757_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.41 -23:54:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158761_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158761_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158762_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158762_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:20.75 -26:02:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158782_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158782_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158783_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158783_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158785_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158785_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:16.27 -24:20:42.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.916 4075203066547709568 284.06788386144 -24.34529574198 12.5794 11.0619 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.916#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158786_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158786_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:44.53 -22:33:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158804_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158804_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:08.62 -29:30:08.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.610 6760928373947782144 285.78574002289 -29.50240482999 12.6694 11.5226 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.610#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158805_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158805_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158814_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 158814_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:29.11 -22:20:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 73035_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.45 -25:35:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 22400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.85 -29:04:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 80329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.75 -25:10:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157186_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 157186_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.02 -27:20:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156398_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 156398_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.94 -28:00:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 136846_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156214_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 156214_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.46 -23:55:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156208_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 156208_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.18 -26:25:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156123_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 156123_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.28 -28:37:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 123580_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.45 -22:34:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 133962_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.59 -23:19:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87556_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 87556_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 27419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.14 -28:51:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 39487_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.44 -27:50:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 138340_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.59 -23:48:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56356_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093
The candidate 56356_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-09_23-15-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0093 did not pass the final checks
