This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 09.4188* 04 07 04.26 +20 44 37.3 7.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.9188,7.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.4188 7.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 09.4188* 04 07 04.25 +20 44 37.3 6.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.9188,6.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.4188 6.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.4188 2461230.9188 12.20 03:12:51.87 +22:03:54.2
161.23483 -30.09182 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis -0 -1 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:51.87 +22:03:54.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:51.87 +22:03:54.2: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 09.4188* 03 12 51.87 +22 03 54.2 12.2 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.9188,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.4188 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.4188 2461230.9188 12.87 03:08:39.09 +20:23:10.4
161.47524 -32.02570 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 -2 2 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:08:39.09 +20:23:10.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:08:39.09 +20:23:10.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 09.4188* 03 08 39.09 +20 23 10.4 12.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.9188,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.4188 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.4188 2461230.9188 12.71 03:51:17.32 +24:33:01.6
167.03292 -22.54059 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia -0 -1 1 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:17.32 +24:33:01.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:17.32 +24:33:01.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 09.4188* 03 51 17.32 +24 33 01.6 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.9188,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.4188 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.4188 2461230.9188 12.22 04:04:04.73 +25:42:44.6
168.40842 -19.69743 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J040405+2542.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.410 Ic Y 0.753 Ic 2453062.40000 205.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:04.73 +25:42:44.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:04.73 +25:42:44.6: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 09.4188* 04 04 04.73 +25 42 44.6 12.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J040405+2542.8,2461230.9188,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J040405+2542.8 20260709.4188 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461230.91909707 09.07.2026 10:03:19.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 33
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10769
Objects passed selection criteria: 10711
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7040.5
Average stars matched: 6872.25 (97.6103 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116568 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 9 05:07:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461230.91909707 09.07.2026 10:03:19.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 178
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 65810
Objects passed selection criteria: 65601
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44615
Average stars matched: 43021.2 (96.4278 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165708 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 9 05:09:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461230.91853867
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:37.367 +22:00:10.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:37.367 +22:00:10.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0166 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:36.354 +22:00:43.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:36.354 +22:00:43.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0184 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:37.367 +22:00:10.25
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:36.354 +22:00:43.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01004 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rcJykUbfjY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EXNSoHJmno
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9i4mnfKzmR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0WbTymlmJR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.5358 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.5358 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 6126 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4792 out of 5149 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5149 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.940200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.940200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.5358 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.5358 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 6126 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4792 out of 5149 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5149 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.5180 to +27.2932 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.5180 to 27.2932 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4773 out of 5143 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5143 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 30 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rcJykUbfjY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=293 n_q2=264 n_q3=174 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EXNSoHJmno (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=295 n_q2=262 n_q3=172 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9i4mnfKzmR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=190, bad_region=0, passed=2828
Got 2828 stars (including 2634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2828 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=222 n_q2=149 n_q3=280 n_q4=310 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0WbTymlmJR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=182, bad_region=0, passed=2834
Got 2834 stars (including 2650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=219 n_q2=146 n_q3=284 n_q4=311 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.260
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.278
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.082
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.103
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.269
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:37.40 +16:37:38.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:11:04.52 +17:10:33.9: 9.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:43.03 +17:11:33.4: 9.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:10:34.89 +16:46:16.7: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:37.40 +16:37:38.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:37.40 +16:37:38.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:22.50 +17:09:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:01.27 +17:03:09.5: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:11:04.52 +17:10:33.9: 9.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:04.52 +17:10:33.9: ref_mag=9.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7114 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:10:34.89 +16:46:16.7: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:43.03 +17:11:33.4: 9.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:34.89 +16:46:16.7: ref_mag=9.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8387 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:43.03 +17:11:33.4: ref_mag=9.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6382 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:22.50 +17:09:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:22.50 +17:09:42.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:01.27 +17:03:09.5: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.83 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:01.27 +17:03:09.5: ref_mag=9.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9358 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:43.17 +16:38:56.0: 10.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:07.52 +16:50:40.0: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:43.17 +16:38:56.0: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:43.17 +16:38:56.0: ref_mag=10.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2238 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:07.52 +16:50:40.0: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:07.52 +16:50:40.0: ref_mag=10.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4227 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20577_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20577_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:59.32 +17:20:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20578_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 20578_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:31.44 +17:16:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20583_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20583_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:03.36 +16:38:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20586_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20586_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:49.59 +17:17:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20589_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20589_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:38.10 +17:50:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20591_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20591_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:11.79 +18:28:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20592_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20592_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:39.60 +17:14:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20597_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20597_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:44.95 +19:18:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20598_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20598_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:14.85 +17:22:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:33.11 +17:29:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20604_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20606_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20606_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20608_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20608_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:21.89 +17:36:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20614_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20614_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:05.40 +18:06:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20616_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20616_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20621_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20621_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20625_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20625_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:13.01 +18:22:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:01.69 +17:49:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20636_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20636_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:09.53 +18:07:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20639_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20639_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:45.28 +17:26:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20641_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:41.70 +17:58:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20646_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20646_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:53.99 +17:14:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20647_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20647_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:42.25 +19:19:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20649_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20649_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 07061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.39 +21:03:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09665_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 09665_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.20 +18:19:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:37.367 +22:00:10.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:37.367 +22:00:10.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0166 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:36.354 +22:00:43.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:36.354 +22:00:43.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0184 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:37.367 +22:00:10.25
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:36.354 +22:00:43.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01004 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZdZatZtqsl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JfyBiDULiV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aIHiD3wJ0Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZfGVX9I5IF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh has not found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4364 out of 5199 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5199 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4364 out of 5199 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5199 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4684 to +27.2933 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4684 to 27.2933 deg
Loaded 6156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4369 out of 5198 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5198 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 155 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZdZatZtqsl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4312, bad_region=7, passed=71155
Got 71155 stars (including 66715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=283 n_q2=261 n_q3=189 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JfyBiDULiV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4374, bad_region=8, passed=71475
Got 71475 stars (including 66975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=278 n_q2=265 n_q3=185 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aIHiD3wJ0Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=444, bad_region=0, passed=18422
Got 18422 stars (including 17955 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18422 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=227 n_q2=148 n_q3=287 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZfGVX9I5IF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=448, bad_region=1, passed=18442
Got 18442 stars (including 17967 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18442 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=221 n_q2=150 n_q3=285 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-02-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_050445_TTUQ1b1x1_56655_ahGZCVFJ/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:22.51 +17:09:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:37.40 +16:37:38.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:43.03 +17:11:33.4: 9.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:11:04.53 +17:10:33.9: 9.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:01.26 +17:03:09.5: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:10:34.90 +16:46:16.8: 9.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:37.40 +16:37:38.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:37.40 +16:37:38.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:22.51 +17:09:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:22.51 +17:09:42.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:43.03 +17:11:33.4: 9.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:43.03 +17:11:33.4: ref_mag=9.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.5964 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:10:34.90 +16:46:16.8: 9.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:01.26 +17:03:09.5: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.63 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:01.26 +17:03:09.5: ref_mag=9.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9254 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:34.90 +16:46:16.8: ref_mag=9.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8119 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:11:04.53 +17:10:33.9: 9.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:04.53 +17:10:33.9: ref_mag=9.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6826 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:43.16 +16:38:56.0: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:43.16 +16:38:56.0: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:43.16 +16:38:56.0: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2319 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:07.53 +16:50:40.1: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:19.98 +16:37:29.7: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:07.53 +16:50:40.1: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:10:56.49 +16:48:09.0: 11.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:07.53 +16:50:40.1: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4272 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:54.22 +16:39:24.7: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:16.31 +17:07:10.3: 10.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:19.98 +16:37:29.7: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:19.98 +16:37:29.7: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9888 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:10:56.49 +16:48:09.0: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:56.49 +16:48:09.0: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1957 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:21.00 +16:53:21.9: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:54.22 +16:39:24.7: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:49.12 +17:09:54.4: 11.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:54.22 +16:39:24.7: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1193 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:11.32 +16:52:22.7: 11.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:16.31 +17:07:10.3: 10.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:21.00 +16:53:21.9: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:16.31 +17:07:10.3: ref_mag=10.86 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9901 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.89 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:21.00 +16:53:21.9: ref_mag=10.89 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1497 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:49.12 +17:09:54.4: 11.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:49.12 +17:09:54.4: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1599 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:11.32 +16:52:22.7: 11.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:11.32 +16:52:22.7: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1548 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:34.62 +17:10:03.6: 11.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:24.13 +17:07:31.4: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:47.20 +16:47:27.6: 11.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:35.14 +17:01:11.4: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:34.62 +17:10:03.6: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:34.62 +17:10:03.6: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3396 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:28.59 +16:52:00.9: 11.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:24.13 +17:07:31.4: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:47.20 +16:47:27.6: 11.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:47.20 +16:47:27.6: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2697 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:24.13 +17:07:31.4: ref_mag=11.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2621 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:35.14 +17:01:11.4: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:35.14 +17:01:11.4: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4096 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:28.59 +16:52:00.9: 11.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:28.59 +16:52:00.9: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3512 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:17.18 +16:38:16.6: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:51.87 +22:03:54.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:43.74 +17:03:08.6: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:17.18 +16:38:16.6: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:17.18 +16:38:16.6: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5519 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:51.87 +22:03:54.2: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:14.50 +16:53:08.5: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:43.74 +17:03:08.6: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:43.74 +17:03:08.6: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4971 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:20.34 +26:05:52.9: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:14.15 +16:59:00.6: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:08.13 +16:55:25.2: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:14.50 +16:53:08.5: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:14.50 +16:53:08.5: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6650 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:20.34 +26:05:52.9: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:20.34 +26:05:52.9: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4498 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:01.74 +16:51:19.8: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:14.15 +16:59:00.6: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:14.15 +16:59:00.6: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5849 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:08.13 +16:55:25.2: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:08.13 +16:55:25.2: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7731 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:54.71 +16:52:08.4: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:14.28 +16:37:17.4: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:01.74 +16:51:19.8: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:01.74 +16:51:19.8: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7711 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:54.71 +16:52:08.4: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:54.71 +16:52:08.4: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7241 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:14.28 +16:37:17.4: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:46.16 +17:07:54.6: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:14.28 +16:37:17.4: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6939 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:43.94 +17:00:02.6: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:34.89 +16:57:21.8: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:46.16 +17:07:54.6: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:43.94 +17:00:02.6: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:46.16 +17:07:54.6: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7596 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:43.94 +17:00:02.6: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8430 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:54.47 +23:50:01.4: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:20:20.05 +24:31:48.7: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:37.25 +16:56:31.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:34.89 +16:57:21.8: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:34.89 +16:57:21.8: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9381 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:21.67 +16:49:24.6: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:54.47 +23:50:01.4: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:54.47 +23:50:01.4: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2132 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:58.33 +16:45:00.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:20:20.05 +24:31:48.7: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:40.76 +16:37:11.1: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:20.05 +24:31:48.7: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4792 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:37.25 +16:56:31.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:37.25 +16:56:31.2: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0807 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:21.67 +16:49:24.6: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:21.67 +16:49:24.6: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0191 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:58.33 +16:45:00.4: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:58.33 +16:45:00.4: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9910 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:40.76 +16:37:11.1: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:40.76 +16:37:11.1: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0009 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:25.17 +16:55:52.7: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:25.13 +16:43:16.3: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:16.62 +16:57:39.7: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:55.62 +16:45:30.9: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:25.17 +16:55:52.7: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:12:02.16 +17:04:35.3: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:25.17 +16:55:52.7: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1259 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:40.59 +18:47:35.7: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:25.13 +16:43:16.3: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:25.13 +16:43:16.3: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9953 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:16.62 +16:57:39.7: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:16.62 +16:57:39.7: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9805 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:55.62 +16:45:30.9: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:55.62 +16:45:30.9: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0295 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:54.15 +23:08:32.7: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:12:02.16 +17:04:35.3: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:02.16 +17:04:35.3: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0107 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:40.59 +18:47:35.7: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:40.59 +18:47:35.7: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5315 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:54.71 +25:11:44.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:54.15 +23:08:32.7: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:54.15 +23:08:32.7: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6273 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:54.71 +25:11:44.0: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:34.54 +16:39:15.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:54.71 +25:11:44.0: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6811 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:08:39.09 +20:23:10.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:14.81 +22:26:16.0: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:34.54 +16:39:15.3: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:34.54 +16:39:15.3: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2147 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:07.46 +23:38:22.9: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:14.81 +22:26:16.0: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:08:39.09 +20:23:10.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:14.81 +22:26:16.0: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4929 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:37.75 +17:07:26.8: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:17.32 +24:33:01.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:07.46 +23:38:22.9: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:07.46 +23:38:22.9: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6267 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:37.75 +17:07:26.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:37.75 +17:07:26.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3857 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:52.37 +17:01:20.6: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:17.32 +24:33:01.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:24.21 +22:45:55.4: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:49.85 +23:15:17.7: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:51.40 +23:11:58.9: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:52.37 +17:01:20.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:52.37 +17:01:20.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5391 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:24.21 +22:45:55.4: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:24.21 +22:45:55.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1095 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:49.85 +23:15:17.7: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:49.85 +23:15:17.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1715 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:51.40 +23:11:58.9: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:51.40 +23:11:58.9: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4113 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:04.73 +25:42:44.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:21.02 +16:44:51.2: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:04.73 +25:42:44.6: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:04:04.73 +25:42:44.6: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2060 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:21.02 +16:44:51.2: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:21.02 +16:44:51.2: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9047 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11236.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87124.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87318.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:59.30 +17:20:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86921_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 86921_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86922_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86922_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:31.43 +17:16:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86924_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86924_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:42.65 +18:25:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86926_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86926_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:03.36 +16:38:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:49.58 +17:17:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86933_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86933_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:38.10 +17:50:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:44.36 +17:39:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86936_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86936_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:11.79 +18:28:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86937_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86937_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:39.60 +17:14:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86943_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86943_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:44.95 +19:18:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86945_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86945_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:14.84 +17:22:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86950_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86950_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:43.94 +18:19:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86951_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86951_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86952_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86952_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:33.11 +17:29:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:21.90 +17:36:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86958_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86958_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86964_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86964_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:05.40 +18:06:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:08.09 +18:38:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86967_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86967_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86971_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86971_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86978_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86978_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:13.01 +18:22:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86979_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86979_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86981_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86981_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:41.93 +17:34:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:01.70 +17:49:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86986_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86986_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:09.53 +18:07:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:45.29 +17:26:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86993_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86993_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:41.70 +17:58:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86994_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86994_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86995_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86995_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:54.00 +17:14:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:42.26 +19:19:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 86999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:45.55 +16:40:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87003_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87003_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87020_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87020_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.28 +25:32:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87021_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87021_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:40.09 +17:26:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87022_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87022_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:36.54 +17:27:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87031_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87031_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:41.77 +17:45:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:36.39 +17:16:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87038_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87038_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:13.26 +18:43:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87041_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87041_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:59.65 +17:15:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87044_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87044_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:10.59 +17:29:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:02.46 +18:51:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87056_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87056_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87068_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87068_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87071_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87071_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:52.76 +17:44:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87073_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87073_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87075_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87075_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:52.98 +18:11:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87076_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87076_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:28.35 +18:12:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87081_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87081_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87083_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87083_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:19.89 +18:15:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87084_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87084_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:00.84 +18:21:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87085_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87085_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:50.90 +18:33:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:09.88 +17:37:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87090_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87090_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:23.96 +17:36:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87096_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87096_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:19.21 +18:27:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87105_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87105_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:16.35 +17:15:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87110_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87110_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:32.84 +17:18:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87111_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87111_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:53.99 +17:50:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87114_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87114_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:11.55 +17:25:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87117_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87117_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:04.17 +18:04:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87118_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87118_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:17.72 +17:46:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87119_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87119_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:47.43 +18:20:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87122_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87122_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87124_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 87124_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87127_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87127_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87128_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87128_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:19.16 +17:22:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87137_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87137_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:08.98 +17:21:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87142_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87142_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:17.76 +18:26:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87146_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87146_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87150_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87150_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:22.72 +18:23:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87157_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87157_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87160_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87160_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87164_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87164_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87165_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87165_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:03.79 +17:16:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:56.64 +17:30:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87176_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87176_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:00.14 +18:49:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87177_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87177_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:30.11 +18:02:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87183_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87183_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:28.57 +18:48:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87184_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87184_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87187_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87187_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87189_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87189_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87190_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87190_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:09.81 +17:58:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87192_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87192_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:01.15 +17:45:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87196_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87196_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:42.28 +17:59:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:57.49 +18:12:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87206_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87206_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:11.21 +18:21:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87207_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87207_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87211_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87211_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87218_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87218_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:52.71 +18:03:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87219_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87219_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87234_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87234_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87235_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87235_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87240_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87240_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87244_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87244_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:52.18 +17:42:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87245_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87245_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:02.52 +17:41:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87248_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87248_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:07.57 +17:43:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87253_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87253_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87258_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87258_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:37.60 +17:33:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87261_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87261_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87262_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87262_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87264_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87264_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87268_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87268_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87271_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87271_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:39.26 +17:53:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87276_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87276_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87277_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87277_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:01.17 +17:29:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87290_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87290_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87291_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87291_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:40.43 +17:32:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87292_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87292_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87295_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87295_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:58.98 +18:03:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:21.80 +19:10:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87303_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87303_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:21.07 +24:04:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87304_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87304_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87309_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87309_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:58.56 +19:15:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:07.51 +24:00:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87315_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87315_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87316_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87316_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:17.73 +18:55:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87318_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 87318_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87331_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87331_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:52.17 +19:04:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87337_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87337_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:22.44 +19:01:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87341_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87341_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87348_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87348_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:18.22 +17:59:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87349_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87349_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87350_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 87350_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87353_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87353_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:42.12 +24:17:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87359_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87359_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:16.32 +17:34:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87361_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87361_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:02.56 +24:51:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87389_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87389_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87396_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87396_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:52.00 +17:37:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:28.67 +22:02:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87425_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87425_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87438_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87438_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 87456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 32790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:13.41 +23:04:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20109_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20109_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:06.39 +24:31:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 45202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.40 +21:03:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55322_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 55322_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:05.46 +18:34:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 11236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54397_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 54397_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.18 +18:19:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48315_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 48315_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24042_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 24042_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:09.63 +24:03:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63847_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 63847_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:48.26 +19:41:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 64764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:10.08 +19:36:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 37504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-03-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
