This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.1798 2461230.6798 8.74 19:15:33.71 -21:36:19.4
15.90447 -14.76391 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 0 -0 0 9.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:15:33.71 -21:36:19.4: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:33.71 -21:36:19.4: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.6798,8.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.1798 8.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.1798 2461230.6798 11.17 19:09:38.94 -27:28:03.3
9.77001 -15.84299 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 1 0 1 11.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:38.94 -27:28:03.3: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:38.94 -27:28:03.3: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.6798,11.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.1798 11.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.1798 2461230.6798 11.40 18:49:27.93 -27:34:43.9
7.81482 -11.78953 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides 0 -1 1 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:27.93 -27:34:43.9: 14.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:27.93 -27:34:43.9: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.6798,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.1798 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.1798 2461230.6798 11.44 19:17:51.02 -29:16:25.9
8.73030 -18.19427 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 0 1 1 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:51.02 -29:16:25.9: 14.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:51.02 -29:16:25.9: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.6798,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.1798 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.1798 2461230.6798 12.33 19:02:02.79 -24:42:15.8
11.68840 -13.17846 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 3 1 3 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:02:02.79 -24:42:15.8: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:02.79 -24:42:15.8: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461230.6798,12.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260709.1798 12.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.1798 2461230.6798 12.98 18:59:42.06 -21:30:40.3
14.43388 -11.36439 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:59:42.06 -21:30:40.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:42.06 -21:30:40.3: 14.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:42.06 -21:30:40.3: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461230.6798,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260709.1798 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 09.1798 2461230.6798 11.99 19:17:49.88 -25:20:22.1
12.55137 -16.71314 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 0.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J191750-2520.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.770 V Y 1.200 V 2452475.90000 156.250000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:49.88 -25:20:22.1: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:49.88 -25:20:22.1: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J191750-2520.4,2461230.6798,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J191750-2520.4 20260709.1798 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461230.68005183 09.07.2026 04:19:06.478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8555
Objects passed selection criteria: 8547
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6876.25
Average stars matched: 5665.25 (82.3887 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 23:51:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461230.68005183 09.07.2026 04:19:06.478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 85657
Objects passed selection criteria: 85530
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 74816.2
Average stars matched: 59397.2 (79.3908 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1933516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 8 15:05:08 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-141-gc31ee76a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 23:56:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461230.67958655
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.274 -25:58:44.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.274 -25:58:44.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0270 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.822 -25:58:44.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.822 -25:58:44.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0260 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:58.274 -25:58:44.04
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:58.822 -25:58:44.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00206 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gR6fzTsXGs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XFzKilU3i5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ttdzf8bGC3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zySYcnY09O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.404200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.404200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 10.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gR6fzTsXGs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, bad_region=0, passed=8597
Got 8597 stars (including 8115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.739 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.621 n_q1=247 n_q2=168 n_q3=255 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XFzKilU3i5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=0, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=250 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ttdzf8bGC3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=174, bad_region=0, passed=2923
Got 2923 stars (including 2748 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=246 n_q2=135 n_q3=293 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zySYcnY09O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=176, bad_region=0, passed=2929
Got 2929 stars (including 2751 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=243 n_q2=140 n_q3=288 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits sigma_overall=0.657 worst_q_ratio=1.125
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.277
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.237
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.223
reference average sigma_overall=0.616 worst_q_ratio=1.201
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038_astrometric_residuals.png (923 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039_astrometric_residuals.png (923 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:15:33.71 -21:36:19.4: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:33.71 -21:36:19.4: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24744.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24741_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 24741_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:07.10 -20:43:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24744_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 24744_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 24754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.39 -22:34:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24756_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 24756_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.77 -29:04:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24761_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 24761_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.60 -26:20:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24772_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 24772_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.79 -23:56:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 22336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.04 -28:51:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20889_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 20889_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.45 -22:18:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 06888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:30.76 -22:29:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:15:33.71 -21:36:19.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.274 -25:58:44.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.274 -25:58:44.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0270 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.822 -25:58:44.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.822 -25:58:44.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0260 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:58.274 -25:58:44.04
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:58.822 -25:58:44.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00206 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nC6JpHDNNu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FFUAL6hGbK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ecK2hYlaQM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gFuMul9CQL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.190200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.190200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 114 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 12.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nC6JpHDNNu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=5805, bad_region=0, passed=85932
Got 85932 stars (including 80013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85932 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.746 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=266 n_q2=176 n_q3=223 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FFUAL6hGbK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=0, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ecK2hYlaQM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=973, bad_region=1, passed=34960
Got 34960 stars (including 33929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34960 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=231 n_q2=131 n_q3=303 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gFuMul9CQL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=948, bad_region=2, passed=35323
Got 35323 stars (including 34318 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35323 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=231 n_q2=137 n_q3=296 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-18-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0038.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_234653_TTUQ1b1x1_2352238_xiNGYgxP/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:45.23 -20:42:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:13:15.38 -22:15:56.4: 12.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:54.97 -21:25:34.5: 12.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:16.34 -27:09:01.2: 11.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:51:10.22 -20:39:06.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:10.22 -20:39:06.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:10.22 -20:39:06.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:15.38 -22:15:56.4: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:54.97 -21:25:34.5: 12.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:45.23 -20:42:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:45.23 -20:42:49.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:16.34 -27:09:01.2: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:54.97 -21:25:34.5: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0357 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:15.38 -22:15:56.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4747 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:16.34 -27:09:01.2: ref_mag=11.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6755 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:38.94 -27:28:03.3: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:27.93 -27:34:43.9: 14.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:09.17 -20:34:28.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:09.17 -20:34:28.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:09.17 -20:34:28.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:51:23.75 -21:07:57.3: 11.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:38.94 -27:28:03.3: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:27.93 -27:34:43.9: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:39:56.61 -30:58:19.0: 11.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:51.02 -29:16:25.9: 14.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:23.75 -21:07:57.3: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:23.75 -21:07:57.3: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8592 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:39:56.61 -30:58:19.0: 11.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:56.61 -30:58:19.0: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.3797 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:51.02 -29:16:25.9: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:35:43.65 -30:14:14.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:35:43.65 -30:14:14.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:43.65 -30:14:14.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:35:55.33 -29:55:39.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:28.77 -21:36:59.0: 12.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:16:03.55 -20:56:36.0: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:35:55.33 -29:55:39.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:55.33 -29:55:39.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:28.77 -21:36:59.0: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:28.77 -21:36:59.0: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3027 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:03.55 -20:56:36.0: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:03.55 -20:56:36.0: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3600 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:34.42 -20:42:45.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:02:02.79 -24:42:15.8: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:34.42 -20:42:45.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:34.42 -20:42:45.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:35.57 -22:02:12.1: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:02.79 -24:42:15.8: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:24.88 -23:14:51.9: 12.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:35.57 -22:02:12.1: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:35.57 -22:02:12.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4011 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:24.88 -23:14:51.9: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:42.06 -21:30:40.3: 14.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:24.88 -23:14:51.9: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5648 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:42.06 -21:30:40.3: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:32.35 -27:01:53.5: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:32.35 -27:01:53.5: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:32.35 -27:01:53.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8107 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:49.88 -25:20:22.1: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:49.88 -25:20:22.1: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:17:49.88 -25:20:22.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.9873 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156493.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156499.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156613.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out157075.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out157301.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out44450.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156170_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156170_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156172_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156172_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:30.89 -27:42:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156173_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156173_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:23.96 -26:57:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156179_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156179_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156180_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156180_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156195_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156195_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:07.09 -20:43:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156200_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156200_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:33.73 -21:36:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156224_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156224_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:30.17 -20:41:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156231_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156231_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156247_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156247_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156301_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156301_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156327_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156327_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156345_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156345_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.21 -28:37:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156349_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156349_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.18 -22:42:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156351_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156351_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:33.85 -20:55:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156403_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156403_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:38.76 -28:45:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156414_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156414_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156438_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156438_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156443_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156443_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156493_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 156493_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156499_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 156499_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156552_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156552_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156581_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156581_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156582_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156582_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156594_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156594_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:56.05 -25:11:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156597_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156597_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:01.66 -21:22:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156607_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156607_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.21 -26:25:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156613_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 156613_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156635_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156635_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156659_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156659_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156661_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156661_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.72 -28:06:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156699_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156699_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:45.70 -24:25:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156718_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156718_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156721_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156721_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.68 -22:23:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156730_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156730_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.10 -27:20:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156733_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156733_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.77 -22:17:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156748_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156748_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:06.02 -28:00:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156760_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156760_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:28.38 -25:56:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156773_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156773_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156787_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156787_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156825_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156825_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156828_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156828_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.64 -23:55:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156854_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156854_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156896_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156896_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156926_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156926_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:37.19 -21:46:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156967_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156967_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156998_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 156998_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.57 -24:07:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157023_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157023_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.25 -22:07:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157028_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157028_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157062_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157062_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:42.15 -22:09:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157064_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157064_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:14.26 -24:02:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157075_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 157075_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157082_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157082_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157104_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157104_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:30.47 -25:48:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157117_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157117_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157120_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157120_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:24.81 -23:15:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157164_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157164_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.58 -25:29:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157166_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157166_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:16.03 -21:10:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157177_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157177_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157184_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157184_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:20.94 -26:02:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157190_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157190_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.32 -28:17:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157210_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157210_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:24.34 -28:14:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157250_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157250_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:38.11 -21:14:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157254_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157254_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:52.04 -23:45:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157272_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157272_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.42 -23:54:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157301_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 157301_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:27.32 -21:19:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157357_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157357_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157381_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157381_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157393_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 157393_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39053_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 39053_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:02.47 -25:51:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78505_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 78505_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:46.95 -23:21:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97495_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 97495_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.40 -22:34:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97776_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 97776_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103818_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 103818_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:19.45 -24:58:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72930_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 72930_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:46.18 -22:32:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82020_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 82020_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.55 -23:48:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 116156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:20.99 -22:59:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104527_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 104527_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.82 -26:56:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112912_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 112912_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:12.74 -28:03:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.38 -23:36:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.89 -25:10:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34361_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 34361_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:27.03 -26:32:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.05 -28:51:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41667_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 41667_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:18.04 -25:39:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20149_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 20149_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.52 -28:02:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125717_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 125717_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:38.55 -21:51:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62556_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 62556_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:43.55 -24:22:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05923_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 05923_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:08.54 -29:58:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.62 -29:49:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58811_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 58811_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:30.86 -22:06:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17882_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 17882_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:32.31 -28:24:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 65824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.73 -24:44:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 101159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.38 -25:35:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15113_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 15113_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.83 -28:54:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106976_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 106976_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:21.19 -28:07:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106841_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 106841_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:08.94 -28:46:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 106754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.48 -27:50:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 44450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55245_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 55245_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:33.10 -21:27:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105090_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 105090_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:43.90 -29:54:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21658_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 21658_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:20.45 -27:49:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98091_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 98091_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:12.54 -21:41:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98036_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 98036_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.86 -30:28:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97791_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 97791_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.79 -23:56:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12877_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 12877_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:09.73 -29:09:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97616_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 97616_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:27.70 -30:14:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97524_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 97524_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.61 -26:20:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109086_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 109086_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:37.15 -25:01:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102317_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 102317_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.52 -23:19:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102109_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 102109_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.21 -27:14:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07024_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 07024_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:09.76 -30:02:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132163_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 132163_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.69 -26:46:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102021_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039
The candidate 102021_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_23-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0039 did not pass the final checks
