This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.3389 2461229.8389 9.76 20:57:41.38 -27:34:24.8
18.07233 -38.60935 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 1 2 10.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:57:41.38 -27:34:24.8: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:57:41.38 -27:34:24.8: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.3389* 20 57 41.38 -27 34 24.8 9.8 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.8389,9.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.3389 9.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.3389 2461229.8389 12.74 21:06:38.24 -24:31:02.4
22.54920 -39.76749 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -0 -2 2 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:06:38.24 -24:31:02.4: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:06:38.24 -24:31:02.4: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.3389* 21 06 38.24 -24 31 02.4 12.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.8389,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.3389 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.3389 2461229.8389 12.89 21:03:54.12 -28:52:23.4
16.83920 -40.23855 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana -0 1 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:03:54.12 -28:52:23.4: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:03:54.12 -28:52:23.4: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.3389* 21 03 54.12 -28 52 23.4 12.9 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.8389,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.3389 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.3389 2461229.8389 13.84 21:06:01.07 -24:42:28.3
22.26109 -39.68369 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.325 Heidelberga -1 -1 2 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:06:01.07 -24:42:28.3: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:06:01.07 -24:42:28.3: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.3389* 21 06 01.07 -24 42 28.3 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.8389,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.3389 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
First image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Last image: 2461229.83925772 08.07.2026 08:08:21.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3572
Objects passed selection criteria: 3572
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3430.75
Average stars matched: 3282.5 (95.6788 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 06:28:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
First image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Last image: 2461229.83925772 08.07.2026 08:08:21.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 26982
Objects passed selection criteria: 26930
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25554.2
Average stars matched: 24394.8 (95.4626 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 130844 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 06:31:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461229.83855938
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:12.851 -26:00:24.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:12.851 -26:00:24.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0097 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:09.775 -26:00:09.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:09.775 -26:00:09.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0176 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:12.851 -26:00:24.22
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:09.775 -26:00:09.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01221 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pP58m0XeGY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8qTbQbkQxg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y8m6Odod16
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e3hIiZcBNs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3769 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3769 out of 4477 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.480700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.480700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3769 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3769 out of 4477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 4783 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.3753 to 325.5913 deg, Dec -31.4689 to -20.1665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.3753 to 325.5913 deg, Dec -31.4689 to -20.1665 deg
Loaded 7549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3915 out of 3964 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3964 out of 4783 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.5 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pP58m0XeGY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, bad_region=821, passed=4477
Got 4477 stars (including 3400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=327 n_q2=157 n_q3=325 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8qTbQbkQxg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, bad_region=800, passed=4783
Got 4783 stars (including 3752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4783 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=320 n_q2=152 n_q3=347 n_q4=152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y8m6Odod16 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=308, bad_region=813, passed=3897
Got 3897 stars (including 2845 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3897 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=318 n_q2=186 n_q3=303 n_q4=166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e3hIiZcBNs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=315, bad_region=823, passed=3895
Got 3895 stars (including 2829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3895 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=321 n_q2=178 n_q3=304 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.069
ref2=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.305
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits sigma_overall=0.422 worst_q_ratio=1.229
reference average sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.1
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:57:41.38 -27:34:24.8: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:57:41.38 -27:34:24.8: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20570.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20570_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 20570_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00958_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 00958_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:03.08 -28:47:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:57:41.38 -27:34:24.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:12.851 -26:00:24.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:12.851 -26:00:24.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0097 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:09.775 -26:00:09.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:09.775 -26:00:09.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0176 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:12.851 -26:00:24.22
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:09.775 -26:00:09.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01221 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3k6aZg0OS3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3b0PhKoh7X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.avzWSLD1T9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hF2dF6HJa7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Loaded 7153 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5699 out of 5990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5990 out of 31558 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.303700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.303700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Loaded 7153 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5699 out of 5990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5990 out of 31558 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 32134 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.3572 to 325.6156 deg, Dec -31.4754 to -20.1015 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.3572 to 325.6156 deg, Dec -31.4754 to -20.1015 deg
Loaded 7617 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5799 out of 6049 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6049 out of 32134 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.4 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3k6aZg0OS3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1200, bad_region=3828, passed=31550
Got 31550 stars (including 26696 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=330 n_q2=149 n_q3=321 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3b0PhKoh7X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=976, bad_region=4474, passed=32132
Got 32132 stars (including 26773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=316 n_q2=142 n_q3=349 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.avzWSLD1T9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=999, bad_region=5080, passed=28867
Got 28867 stars (including 22940 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28867 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=323 n_q2=196 n_q3=277 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hF2dF6HJa7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=996, bad_region=5107, passed=28846
Got 28846 stars (including 22884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28846 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=328 n_q2=192 n_q3=278 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-07-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_031220_TTUQ2b1x1_756678_NPjDxZWw/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:43:57.21 -29:03:42.3: 13.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:26:19.94 -25:38:57.6: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:44:20.88 -29:22:07.8: 13.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:52:10.87 -28:44:10.6: 12.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:56:27.50 -26:12:41.5: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:11:02.73 -22:18:33.2: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:41:50.56 -29:50:17.6: 12.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:25:13.24 -28:33:30.2: 13.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:38:00.73 -24:39:28.3: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:02:51.30 -28:55:55.9: 12.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:52:10.87 -28:44:10.6: 12.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:43:57.21 -29:03:42.3: 12.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:02:51.30 -28:55:55.9: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:56:27.50 -26:12:41.5: 13.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:38:00.73 -24:39:28.3: 11.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:44:20.88 -29:22:07.8: 13.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:41:50.56 -29:50:17.6: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:11:02.73 -22:18:33.2: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:25:13.24 -28:33:30.2: 13.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:26:19.94 -25:38:57.6: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:10.87 -28:44:10.6: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1465 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:57.21 -29:03:42.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5110 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:20.88 -29:22:07.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5404 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:02.73 -22:18:33.2: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1382 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:51.30 -28:55:55.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1594 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:19.94 -25:38:57.6: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6991 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.56 -29:50:17.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0085 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:13.24 -28:33:30.2: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6358 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:00.73 -24:39:28.3: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4015 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:27.50 -26:12:41.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7482 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:23:27.01 -29:56:47.0: 14.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:23.20 -29:46:33.0: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:22:37.39 -23:59:31.1: 11.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:06:38.24 -24:31:02.4: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:03:54.12 -28:52:23.4: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:15.62 -29:20:20.9: 13.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:20:16.12 -29:41:51.8: 13.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:33.67 -29:11:55.1: 13.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:03:54.12 -28:52:23.4: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:15.62 -29:20:20.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:23:27.01 -29:56:47.0: 13.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:23.20 -29:46:33.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:15.62 -29:20:20.9: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.4541 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:27.01 -29:56:47.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6774 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:22:37.39 -23:59:31.1: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:06:38.24 -24:31:02.4: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:23.20 -29:46:33.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4297 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:05.10 -28:28:10.7: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:37.39 -23:59:31.1: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8355 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:33.67 -29:11:55.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:20:16.12 -29:41:51.8: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:26:21.03 -29:15:57.1: 13.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:33.67 -29:11:55.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3578 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:16.12 -29:41:51.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5106 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:05.10 -28:28:10.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:05.10 -28:28:10.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5465 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:26:21.03 -29:15:57.1: 13.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:21.03 -29:15:57.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7141 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:49:35.54 -29:53:46.2: 13.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:15:19.36 -30:06:49.0: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:11.34 -30:08:39.9: 13.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:14:11.30 -29:30:30.9: 13.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:23:13.75 -29:47:46.1: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:16:14.91 -30:05:13.6: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:15:19.36 -30:06:49.0: 13.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:49:35.54 -29:53:46.2: 14.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:11.34 -30:08:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:19.36 -30:06:49.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6514 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:35.54 -29:53:46.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5485 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:11.34 -30:08:39.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.6799 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:14:11.30 -29:30:30.9: 13.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:11.30 -29:30:30.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6372 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:23:13.75 -29:47:46.1: 13.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:13.75 -29:47:46.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6983 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:16:14.91 -30:05:13.6: 13.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:14.91 -30:05:13.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7162 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:15:06.33 -29:55:41.0: 13.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:26:16.71 -29:31:07.1: 14.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:15:06.33 -29:55:41.0: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:26:16.71 -29:31:07.1: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:06.33 -29:55:41.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7435 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:16.71 -29:31:07.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7346 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:26:38.01 -30:07:42.0: 14.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:17:21.35 -29:28:07.7: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:25:37.01 -27:52:25.4: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:07:18.53 -28:44:03.5: 13.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:11.46 -29:35:22.0: 13.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:22:44.95 -29:14:17.9: 13.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:26:38.01 -30:07:42.0: 14.12 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:17:21.35 -29:28:07.7: 13.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:38.01 -30:07:42.0: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6963 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:21.35 -29:28:07.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7349 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:25:37.01 -27:52:25.4: 14.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:37.01 -27:52:25.4: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7140 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:11.46 -29:35:22.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:11.46 -29:35:22.0: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7968 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:07:18.53 -28:44:03.5: 13.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:18.53 -28:44:03.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6749 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:22:44.95 -29:14:17.9: 13.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:26:47.10 -27:21:00.2: 13.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:44.95 -29:14:17.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7945 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:25:31.78 -29:41:42.5: 14.15 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:26:47.10 -27:21:00.2: 14.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:47.10 -27:21:00.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7774 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:25:31.78 -29:41:42.5: 14.28 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:31.78 -29:41:42.5: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8183 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:09:44.97 -29:43:17.9: 13.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:10:11.18 -29:27:38.0: 13.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:41:55.62 -29:11:03.9: 13.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:11:31.50 -30:05:04.6: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:59:36.24 -30:14:12.7: 13.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:20:52.70 -29:34:12.9: 13.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:10:11.18 -29:27:38.0: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:09:44.97 -29:43:17.9: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:41:55.62 -29:11:03.9: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:11.18 -29:27:38.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7524 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:44.97 -29:43:17.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8106 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:55.62 -29:11:03.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4591 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:59:36.24 -30:14:12.7: 14.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:11:31.50 -30:05:04.6: 13.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:36.24 -30:14:12.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6560 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:31.50 -30:05:04.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7989 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:55:14.34 -30:04:16.9: 13.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:20:52.70 -29:34:12.9: 13.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:22:59.07 -27:31:29.1: 14.36 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:52.70 -29:34:12.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7535 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:55:14.34 -30:04:16.9: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:14.34 -30:04:16.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7293 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:22:59.07 -27:31:29.1: 14.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:59.07 -27:31:29.1: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8852 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:49:37.46 -29:39:41.2: 13.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:53:37.10 -27:20:09.8: 14.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:35:49.72 -29:54:50.5: 13.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:14:48.65 -28:11:28.5: 13.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:36:37.82 -29:47:30.2: 13.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:01:26.09 -30:15:23.0: 14.28 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:53:37.10 -27:20:09.8: 14.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:37.10 -27:20:09.8: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7224 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:35:49.72 -29:54:50.5: 13.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:59:44.08 -29:03:56.8: 13.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:49.72 -29:54:50.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4169 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:49:37.46 -29:39:41.2: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:02:35.95 -28:31:41.9: 14.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:01:26.09 -30:15:23.0: 14.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:37.46 -29:39:41.2: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6848 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:26.09 -30:15:23.0: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9045 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:14:48.65 -28:11:28.5: 14.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:36:37.82 -29:47:30.2: 13.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:37.82 -29:47:30.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6260 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:48.65 -28:11:28.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8160 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:59:44.08 -29:03:56.8: 14.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:44.08 -29:03:56.8: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8712 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:02:35.95 -28:31:41.9: 14.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:35.95 -28:31:41.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8985 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:04:34.96 -27:59:12.6: 13.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:44:26.54 -29:52:55.9: 14.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:48:18.39 -29:56:23.9: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:41:22.23 -29:25:05.0: 13.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:06:01.07 -24:42:28.3: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:04:34.96 -27:59:12.6: 14.38 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:34.96 -27:59:12.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8980 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:47:53.94 -29:56:07.7: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:44:26.54 -29:52:55.9: 13.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:26.54 -29:52:55.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7304 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:41:22.23 -29:25:05.0: 13.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:22.23 -29:25:05.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7693 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:06:01.07 -24:42:28.3: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:48:18.39 -29:56:23.9: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:18.39 -29:56:23.9: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7237 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:47:53.94 -29:56:07.7: 13.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:53.94 -29:56:07.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7127 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53098.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53100.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53498.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53053_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53053_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53056_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53056_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53058_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53058_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53062_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53064_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53066_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53067_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53071_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53073_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53073_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53074_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53075_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53077_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53077_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:57:41.38 -27:34:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53098_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 53098_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 53100_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53102_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:14:45.45 -27:58:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53114_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53114_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53122_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53122_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53138_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53138_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53143_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53151_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53151_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53159_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53159_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53170_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53170_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53173_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53173_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53178_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53182_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53182_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53186_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53186_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53187_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53187_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53194_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53197_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53197_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53202_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53202_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53205_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53205_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53210_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53211_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53211_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53215_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53215_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53216_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53216_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53217_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53217_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53222_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53222_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53223_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53223_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53228_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53228_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53229_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53229_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53235_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53243_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53243_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53246_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53246_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53253_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53253_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53257_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53267_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53267_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53274_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53274_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53286_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53286_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53296_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53309_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53309_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53317_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53317_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53324_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53358_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53358_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53365_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53365_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53382_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53382_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53400_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53400_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53414_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53414_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53455_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53455_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53467_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 53467_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53498_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 53498_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04897_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 04897_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:03.09 -28:47:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08184_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175
The candidate 08184_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_03-08-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0175 did not pass the final checks