This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2411 2461229.7411 12.36 19:49:01.83 -21:20:08.5
19.33641 -21.84132 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa 0 -0 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:49:01.83 -21:20:08.5: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:49:01.83 -21:20:08.5: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7411,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2411 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.2411 2461229.7411 13.20 20:08:00.90 -24:50:26.3
17.40533 -27.15651 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.66 Maja -0 1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:08:00.90 -24:50:26.3: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:08:00.90 -24:50:26.3: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.2411* 20 08 00.90 -24 50 26.3 13.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461229.7411,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260708.2411 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461229.74145337 08.07.2026 05:47:31.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 23
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7094
Objects passed selection criteria: 7090
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6671.25
Average stars matched: 6547.25 (98.1413 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112852 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 00:54:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461229.74145337 08.07.2026 05:47:31.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 84
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 54263
Objects passed selection criteria: 54178
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48376.8
Average stars matched: 47008.8 (97.1722 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 154852 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 8 00:56:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461229.74077829
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:41.660 -26:01:40.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:41.660 -26:01:40.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:44.367 -26:02:12.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:44.367 -26:02:12.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:41.660 -26:01:40.17
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:44.367 -26:02:12.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01363 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w9trTb6fVP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.euhCGnqwrJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x4bBzaEdrF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7w1ZpSnmvh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.601900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.601900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Loaded 9431 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5463 out of 5572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5572 out of 6777 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.w9trTb6fVP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, bad_region=0, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=238 n_q2=214 n_q3=259 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.euhCGnqwrJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=434, bad_region=0, passed=6777
Got 6777 stars (including 6336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=240 n_q2=208 n_q3=266 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x4bBzaEdrF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=248, bad_region=0, passed=6316
Got 6316 stars (including 6063 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6316 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=244 n_q2=200 n_q3=272 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7w1ZpSnmvh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=252, bad_region=2, passed=6259
Got 6259 stars (including 6001 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6259 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=246 n_q2=198 n_q3=271 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.314
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits sigma_overall=0.498 worst_q_ratio=1.246
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.162
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.270
reference average sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.28
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:38.80 -20:53:44.1: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:56.30 -28:35:32.8: 11.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:22.47 -30:30:57.0: 9.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:08:08.42 -28:01:31.5: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:48.59 -20:45:42.5: 11.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:24.40 -20:42:10.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:47:33.20 -21:08:45.0: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:29.33 -24:51:34.2: 11.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:31.02 -26:05:28.5: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:22.47 -30:30:57.0: 9.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:08:08.42 -28:01:31.5: 11.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:06:56.30 -28:35:32.8: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:41:38.80 -20:53:44.1: 11.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:45:48.59 -20:45:42.5: 11.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:08.42 -28:01:31.5: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3074 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:38.80 -20:53:44.1: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2736 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:48.59 -20:45:42.5: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3879 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.47 -30:30:57.0: ref_mag=9.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7680 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:56.30 -28:35:32.8: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1260 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:12:15.58 -23:20:53.3: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:58:31.02 -26:05:28.5: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:51:24.40 -20:42:10.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:24.40 -20:42:10.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:47:33.20 -21:08:45.0: 11.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:45:29.33 -24:51:34.2: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:31.02 -26:05:28.5: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4782 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:33.20 -21:08:45.0: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4269 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:29.33 -24:51:34.2: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3494 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:12:15.58 -23:20:53.3: 11.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:15.58 -23:20:53.3: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4505 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:08:17.19 -25:53:28.0: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:08.99 -26:10:07.0: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:08:17.19 -25:53:28.0: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:17.19 -25:53:28.0: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5073 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:58:08.99 -26:10:07.0: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:08.99 -26:10:07.0: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5315 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20138_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20139_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20139_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20168_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20168_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.62 -22:18:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20197_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20197_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.31 -28:31:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20275_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20275_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:57.58 -24:53:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20280_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:06.75 -23:30:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20288_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20288_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20314_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20314_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:09.31 -22:25:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20316_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20316_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20320_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20320_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20337_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20337_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20347_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20347_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20349_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20357_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.01 -28:46:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20367_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20372_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:56.56 -29:11:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03609_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 03609_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:02.86 -25:51:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01584_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 01584_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:02.81 -28:47:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03628_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 03628_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:48.74 -25:46:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05214_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 05214_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:33:10.42 -23:40:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:41.660 -26:01:40.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:41.660 -26:01:40.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:44.367 -26:02:12.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:44.367 -26:02:12.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:41.660 -26:01:40.17
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:44.367 -26:02:12.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01363 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6iuqGHRITx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PDWBluxLeY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xRnxFf05I9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wLyc5OttVj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.442600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.442600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 55853 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Loaded 9461 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7592 out of 8135 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8135 out of 55853 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.4 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6iuqGHRITx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2722, bad_region=2, passed=59768
Got 59768 stars (including 56968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.690 n_q1=249 n_q2=208 n_q3=247 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PDWBluxLeY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2424, bad_region=0, passed=55844
Got 55844 stars (including 53347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55844 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.615 n_q1=249 n_q2=207 n_q3=250 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xRnxFf05I9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1471, bad_region=1, passed=39673
Got 39673 stars (including 38153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39673 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=240 n_q2=196 n_q3=277 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wLyc5OttVj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1481, bad_region=3, passed=39640
Got 39640 stars (including 38105 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=238 n_q2=194 n_q3=276 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-08_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_005148_TTUQ1b1x1_4194188_5q32NzU7/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:29.44 -21:32:07.8: 12.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:37:11.76 -30:07:00.1: 12.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:22.50 -30:30:56.8: 10.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:05:07.56 -28:12:51.2: 13.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:58.95 -20:50:58.0: 13.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:42.54 -25:57:14.7: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:49:01.83 -21:20:08.5: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:39.06 -21:56:14.5: 12.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:42.54 -25:57:14.7: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:37:11.76 -30:07:00.1: 12.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:55:58.95 -20:50:58.0: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:22.50 -30:30:56.8: 10.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:05:07.56 -28:12:51.2: 13.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.04 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:42.54 -25:57:14.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0585 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:58.95 -20:50:58.0: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2089 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:11.76 -30:07:00.1: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0132 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.50 -30:30:56.8: ref_mag=10.04 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6855 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:07.56 -28:12:51.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1942 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:40:29.44 -21:32:07.8: 12.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:29.44 -21:32:07.8: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7433 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:01:46.07 -22:15:44.2: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:49:01.83 -21:20:08.5: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:39.06 -21:56:14.5: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.06 -21:56:14.5: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2974 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:46.63 -25:37:53.8: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:01:46.07 -22:15:44.2: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:46.07 -22:15:44.2: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4205 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:04.93 -24:24:04.6: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:55.18 -23:36:27.9: 12.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:41.68 -23:01:16.6: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:10.30 -21:55:28.3: 13.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:36:46.63 -25:37:53.8: 12.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.63 -25:37:53.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7078 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:55.18 -23:36:27.9: 12.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:55:04.93 -24:24:04.6: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:55.18 -23:36:27.9: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8532 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:45:41.68 -23:01:16.6: 12.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:04.93 -24:24:04.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0391 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:41.68 -23:01:16.6: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8780 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:06:10.30 -21:55:28.3: 13.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:10.30 -21:55:28.3: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9423 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:40.29 -21:09:45.8: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:30.18 -22:41:26.0: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:41.87 -30:15:16.5: 13.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:27:29.07 -30:48:35.9: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:39:40.29 -21:09:45.8: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:36:30.18 -22:41:26.0: 13.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:40.29 -21:09:45.8: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0100 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:31.99 -27:22:16.8: 13.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:30.18 -22:41:26.0: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2210 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:41.87 -30:15:16.5: 13.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:41.87 -30:15:16.5: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0064 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:27:29.07 -30:48:35.9: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:01.26 -22:27:46.4: 13.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:08:00.90 -24:50:26.3: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:44.16 -21:50:34.1: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:03.42 -21:31:22.1: 13.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:31.99 -27:22:16.8: 13.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:31.99 -27:22:16.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2340 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:08:00.90 -24:50:26.3: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:54:01.26 -22:27:46.4: 13.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:01.26 -22:27:46.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3455 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:44.16 -21:50:34.1: 13.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:03.42 -21:31:22.1: 13.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:44.16 -21:50:34.1: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4228 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:03.42 -21:31:22.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3767 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:53.03 -21:34:37.9: 13.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:26.83 -24:55:01.9: 13.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:50.60 -21:11:50.3: 13.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:53.03 -21:34:37.9: 13.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:26.83 -24:55:01.9: 13.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:53.03 -21:34:37.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5718 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:26.83 -24:55:01.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4842 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:50.60 -21:11:50.3: 14.35 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.60 -21:11:50.3: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6043 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:35.54 -21:05:34.0: 13.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:14.19 -21:31:22.3: 13.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:35.54 -21:05:34.0: 13.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:35.54 -21:05:34.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6865 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:45.16 -21:14:54.3: 14.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:14.19 -21:31:22.3: 13.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:14.19 -21:31:22.3: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7443 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:46:38.37 -20:50:26.4: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:03.23 -21:43:13.8: 14.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:05.85 -24:12:56.8: 14.44 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:45.16 -21:14:54.3: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:45.16 -21:14:54.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7619 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:28.33 -25:05:44.9: 14.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:46:38.37 -20:50:26.4: 14.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:03.23 -21:43:13.8: 14.16 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:03.23 -21:43:13.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9729 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:38.37 -20:50:26.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6722 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:53:05.85 -24:12:56.8: 14.72 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:05.85 -24:12:56.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.9288 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:28.33 -25:05:44.9: 13.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:28.33 -25:05:44.9: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6648 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:30.21 -29:58:22.5: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:07.83 -26:42:28.1: 13.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:44:06.32 -30:01:16.1: 12.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:38:56.37 -30:13:26.9: 12.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:30.21 -29:58:22.5: 11.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:30.21 -29:58:22.5: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4407 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:07.83 -26:42:28.1: 13.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:07.83 -26:42:28.1: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6650 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:41.27 -30:09:34.1: 12.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:38:56.37 -30:13:26.9: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:44:06.32 -30:01:16.1: 12.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:56.37 -30:13:26.9: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2821 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:06.32 -30:01:16.1: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7927 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:41.76 -29:24:35.8: 12.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:39:41.27 -30:09:34.1: 12.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:41.27 -30:09:34.1: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0733 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:41.76 -29:24:35.8: 12.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:41.76 -29:24:35.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5202 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74377.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74481.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73340_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73340_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73343_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73343_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73347_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73347_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73353_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73353_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73356_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73356_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73570_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73570_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.00 -28:46:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73578_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73578_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.24 -29:54:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73626_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73626_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:17.04 -27:05:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73689_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73689_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.44 -23:25:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73691_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73691_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.01 -22:58:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73795_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73795_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.20 -24:13:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73811_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73811_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73848_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
Preparing report for the candidate 73848_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73880_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 73880_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74050_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74050_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:25.80 -21:31:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74064_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74064_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74102_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74102_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:35.55 -21:49:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74104_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74104_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74148_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74148_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:01.13 -22:19:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74182_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74182_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74218_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74218_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74235_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74235_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74254_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74254_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74271_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74271_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:22.61 -30:10:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74278_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74278_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.57 -23:10:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74293_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74293_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74356_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74356_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74377_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74377_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:29.07 -30:48:35.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.845 6796396935418855296 306.87153526452 -30.81034451579 13.0470 11.2430 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.845#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74419_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74419_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74436_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74436_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74444_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74444_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74481_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
Preparing report for the candidate 74481_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74524_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74524_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74576_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74576_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74642_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74642_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74677_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74677_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74699_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74699_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74716_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74716_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:23.47 -22:48:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74719_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74719_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74739_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74739_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74764_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74764_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74768_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74768_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74773_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74773_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:11.39 -22:18:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74785_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74785_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74800_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74800_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74841_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74841_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:55.44 -22:18:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74847_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74847_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74850_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 74850_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:57.82 -27:55:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25958_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 25958_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:48.74 -25:46:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 51053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.62 -22:18:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 32137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:57.59 -24:53:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 43287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:33:10.40 -23:40:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42909_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 42909_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:06.73 -23:30:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.31 -28:31:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05158_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 05158_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:05.03 -29:40:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 02724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:28.43 -30:14:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:31.19 -22:06:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38707_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 38707_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:18.00 -23:41:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03942_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 03942_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:33.30 -26:40:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20393_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 20393_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03090_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 03090_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03552_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 03552_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 09371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:02.81 -28:47:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:56.57 -29:11:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25680_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 25680_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:02.87 -25:51:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 69887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69867_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181
The candidate 69867_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_00-47-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181 did not pass the final checks