This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1715 2461229.6715 14.05 09:02:59.14 +55:14:05.8
161.99674 40.55244 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:02:59.14 +55:14:05.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:02:59.14 +55:14:05.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:02:59.14 +55:14:05.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.1715* 09 02 59.14 +55 14 05.8 14.1 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.6715,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.1715 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1715 2461229.6715 14.45 09:17:32.78 +57:35:52.4
158.32859 41.97817 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:17:32.78 +57:35:52.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:17:32.78 +57:35:52.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:17:32.78 +57:35:52.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.1715* 09 17 32.78 +57 35 52.4 14.4 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.6715,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.1715 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1715 2461229.6715 14.59 10:36:02.97 +54:41:46.1
155.31919 53.06303 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:36:02.97 +54:41:46.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:36:02.97 +54:41:46.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:36:02.97 +54:41:46.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.1715* 10 36 02.97 +54 41 46.1 14.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.6715,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.1715 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1715 2461229.6715 14.52 10:08:27.66 +52:59:16.5
160.94284 50.35512 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.2" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:08:27.66 +52:59:16.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:08:27.66 +52:59:16.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:08:27.66 +52:59:16.5: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.1715* 10 08 27.66 +52 59 16.5 14.5 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.6715,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.1715 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1715 2461229.6715 14.71 09:44:06.74 +53:57:36.2
161.60615 46.63110 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:44:06.74 +53:57:36.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:44:06.74 +53:57:36.2: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:44:06.74 +53:57:36.2: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.1715* 09 44 06.74 +53 57 36.2 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.6715,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.1715 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 08.1715 2461229.6715 14.66 09:46:27.13 +54:10:00.6
161.15471 46.88599 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:46:27.13 +54:10:00.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:46:27.13 +54:10:00.6: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:46:27.13 +54:10:00.6: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 08.1715* 09 46 27.13 +54 10 00.6 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461229.6715,14.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260708.1715 14.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.81449691 18.01.2026 07:32:42.533 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
First image: 2461058.81449691 18.01.2026 07:32:42.533 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Last image: 2461229.67172306 08.07.2026 04:07:06.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8117
Objects passed selection criteria: 8084
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6513.75
Average stars matched: 6324.75 (97.0984 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113740 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 23:12:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.81449691 18.01.2026 07:32:42.533 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
First image: 2461058.81449691 18.01.2026 07:32:42.533 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Last image: 2461229.67172306 08.07.2026 04:07:06.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 115
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41164
Objects passed selection criteria: 41065
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 34696
Average stars matched: 33264.5 (95.8742 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141924 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 7 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-138-g473912fb
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 23:14:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461229.67124091
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits'
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:08.638 +53:59:07.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16
Second-epoch image center 09:53:08.638 +53:59:07.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:09.205 +53:59:06.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16
Second-epoch image center 09:53:09.205 +53:59:06.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0261 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:53:08.638 +53:59:07.79
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:09.205 +53:59:06.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00147 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00147 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MoDBXCINQ4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6SvjtprKjY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vNWNw6Yn12
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v90Yg1Dwyh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8251 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec +47.5566 to +59.4234 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec 47.5566 to 59.4234 deg
Loaded 6340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4198 out of 4385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4385 out of 8251 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.894600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.894600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8251 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec +47.5566 to +59.4234 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec 47.5566 to 59.4234 deg
Loaded 6340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4198 out of 4385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4385 out of 8251 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8222 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6961 to 162.5839 deg, Dec +47.5565 to +59.4234 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6961 to 162.5839 deg, Dec 47.5565 to 59.4234 deg
Loaded 6340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4385 out of 8222 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
2.1 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MoDBXCINQ4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, bad_region=0, passed=8251
Got 8251 stars (including 7709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=265 n_q2=239 n_q3=229 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6SvjtprKjY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=547, bad_region=0, passed=8222
Got 8222 stars (including 7663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8222 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=262 n_q2=240 n_q3=229 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vNWNw6Yn12 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, bad_region=0, passed=4894
Got 4894 stars (including 4596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=250 n_q2=224 n_q3=245 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v90Yg1Dwyh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, bad_region=0, passed=4834
Got 4834 stars (including 4567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=250 n_q2=224 n_q3=244 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.166
ref2=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.126
new1=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new2=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.163
reference average sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.146
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:08.638 +53:59:07.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16
Second-epoch image center 09:53:08.638 +53:59:07.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:09.205 +53:59:06.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16
Second-epoch image center 09:53:09.205 +53:59:06.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0261 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:53:08.638 +53:59:07.79
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:09.205 +53:59:06.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00147 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00147 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qfuAgFIVCO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dFCi0a0NtJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bYUyTsp5ke
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3NIqAdiXgO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec +47.5272 to +59.4411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec 47.5272 to 59.4411 deg
Loaded 6377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3960 out of 4415 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4415 out of 42364 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.797800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.797800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec +47.5272 to +59.4411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec 47.5272 to 59.4411 deg
Loaded 6377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3960 out of 4415 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4415 out of 42364 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 42530 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6812 to 162.6260 deg, Dec +47.5271 to +59.4461 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6812 to 162.6260 deg, Dec 47.5271 to 59.4461 deg
Loaded 6384 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3952 out of 4417 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4417 out of 42530 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
2.0 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qfuAgFIVCO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2009, bad_region=1, passed=42346
Got 42346 stars (including 40286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42346 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=262 n_q2=240 n_q3=231 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dFCi0a0NtJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2054, bad_region=1, passed=42513
Got 42513 stars (including 40393 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=257 n_q2=240 n_q3=230 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bYUyTsp5ke (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1037, bad_region=26, passed=27515
Got 27515 stars (including 26404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=252 n_q2=231 n_q3=247 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3NIqAdiXgO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1083, bad_region=20, passed=27425
Got 27425 stars (including 26275 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27425 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.403 n_q1=253 n_q2=229 n_q3=245 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_230746_TTUQ1b1x1_2934319_AyNg71cj/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:49:58.17 +55:50:18.8: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:49:58.17 +55:50:18.8: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:49:58.17 +55:50:18.8: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2372 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:59:37.69 +56:47:41.4: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:19:02.63 +55:07:37.9: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:59:37.69 +56:47:41.4: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:37.69 +56:47:41.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9219 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:33:30.95 +56:46:11.0: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:19:02.63 +55:07:37.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:19:02.63 +55:07:37.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1957 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:53:37.16 +51:58:21.0: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:29:44.88 +55:04:23.2: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:05:02.29 +55:26:40.4: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:33:30.95 +56:46:11.0: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:30.95 +56:46:11.0: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5575 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:53:37.16 +51:58:21.0: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:37.16 +51:58:21.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7388 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:29:44.88 +55:04:23.2: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:29:44.88 +55:04:23.2: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6021 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:05:02.29 +55:26:40.4: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:05:02.29 +55:26:40.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7155 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:17:20.75 +56:27:30.1: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:17:20.75 +56:27:30.1: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:17:20.75 +56:27:30.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8245 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:02:49.67 +57:52:41.2: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:00:27.74 +51:53:45.1: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:02:49.67 +57:52:41.2: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:49.67 +57:52:41.2: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9633 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:02:59.14 +55:14:05.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:00:27.74 +51:53:45.1: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:27.74 +51:53:45.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0576 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:02:59.14 +55:14:05.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:30:25.85 +57:53:12.5: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:30:25.85 +57:53:12.5: 14.75 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:25.85 +57:53:12.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3827 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:17:32.78 +57:35:52.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:08:27.66 +52:59:16.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:36:02.97 +54:41:46.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:44:06.74 +53:57:36.2: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:08:27.66 +52:59:16.5: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:17:32.78 +57:35:52.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:36:02.97 +54:41:46.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:46:27.13 +54:10:00.6: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:44:06.74 +53:57:36.2: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:46:27.13 +54:10:00.6: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54781.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55023.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55058.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55110.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52872_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 52872_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:11.34 +58:46:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52877_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 52877_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 52946_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53064_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53070_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53070_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53113_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53146_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53168_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53168_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53200_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53227_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53227_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53242_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53260_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53260_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53268_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53268_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53282_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53282_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53365_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53365_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53372_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53372_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53397_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53397_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53420_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53420_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:36.99 +58:32:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53435_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53435_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:07.21 +50:00:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53482_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53482_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53489_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53489_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53546_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53546_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53597_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53597_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:28:55.82 +55:09:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53666_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53666_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53720_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53744_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53744_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53762_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53809_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53809_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53915_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53915_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:42:44.03 +55:54:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53924_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53924_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53927_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53927_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:33:52.78 +53:29:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53984_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 53984_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54000_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54000_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54019_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54019_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54065_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54071_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54071_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54074_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54074_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54084_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54084_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:37.51 +53:20:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54116_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54116_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54135_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54135_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54148_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54148_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54184_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54184_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54187_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54187_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54205_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54205_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54233_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54233_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54247_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54247_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:57.37 +58:41:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54261_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54261_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:46:14.90 +57:06:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54271_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54271_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:24.53 +57:25:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54287_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54287_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54306_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54306_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54348_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54348_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:26:05.89 +52:37:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54374_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54374_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:53:25.01 +50:37:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54395_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54395_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54405_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54405_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54418_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54418_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:57.01 +52:01:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54431_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54431_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54488_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54488_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54512_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54512_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54535_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54535_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:55.42 +52:15:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54544_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54544_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:10.64 +55:05:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54574_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54574_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54584_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54584_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:04.12 +58:14:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54650_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54650_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54665_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54665_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54717_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54717_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54721_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54721_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54737_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54737_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54752_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54752_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54781_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 54781_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54786_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54786_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54804_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54804_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54840_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54840_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54876_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54876_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54877_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54877_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54879_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54879_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54887_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54887_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54919_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54919_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54936_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54936_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54948_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54948_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54952_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54952_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54959_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54959_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54972_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54972_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54975_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54975_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:35:05.90 +57:19:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54987_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54987_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54996_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54996_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55020_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 55020_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55022_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 55022_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55023_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 55023_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55051_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 55051_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55058_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 55058_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55090_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 55090_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55094_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 55094_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55095_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 55095_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55096_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 55096_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55110_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 55110_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55116_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 55116_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12395_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 12395_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_23-07-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
