######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Dra-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 610318 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 610318 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
renamed 'Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 385.2809
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.2397
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 959.1549
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 475.6876
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 961.9258
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 475.5646
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.4895
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.0200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-07T01:17:43.3124959' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-07T06:17:43.3124959' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61228.2623068518 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-07T06:17:53.2140186' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61228.2624214585 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 232.938488108004 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 54.0002483775223 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.8694444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 316.688888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.2535394428471 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.0200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.0200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits :)
Spent 0.644247 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.9699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-07T01:18:23.9215661' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-07T06:18:23.9215661' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61228.2627768633 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-07T06:18:33.8247624' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61228.2628914816 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 232.938488159942 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 54.000248348479 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.7741666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 316.648333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.25511700988657 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.9699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.9699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits :)
Spent 0.606293 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.76242259
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:45.497 +54:00:21.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:31:45.497 +54:00:21.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:43.318 +54:00:37.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:31:43.318 +54:00:37.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0148 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:31:45.497 +54:00:21.23
Second-epoch second image center 15:31:43.318 +54:00:37.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00700 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YyxXY28QRv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PP1J6Tp5oV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8AwYivXccL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CTQZF2nrGg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec +48.2439 to +59.2440 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec 48.2439 to 59.2440 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4420 out of 4572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4572 out of 8363 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec +48.2439 to +59.2440 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec 48.2439 to 59.2440 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4420 out of 4572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4572 out of 8363 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8357 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1988 to 247.8636 deg, Dec +48.2439 to +59.2440 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1988 to 247.8636 deg, Dec 48.2439 to 59.2440 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4426 out of 4576 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4576 out of 8357 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
2.4 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
2.4 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
15.4 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YyxXY28QRv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, bad_region=1718, passed=8363
Got 8363 stars (including 6277 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1610858.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.860000 --output scan_ucac5_1610858.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 943 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1610858.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.860000 --output scan_ucac5_1610858.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 944 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=326 n_q2=157 n_q3=309 n_q4=152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PP1J6Tp5oV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=460, bad_region=1712, passed=8357
Got 8357 stars (including 6274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1610869.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.860000 --output scan_ucac5_1610869.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 943 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1610869.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.860000 --output scan_ucac5_1610869.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 943 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=324 n_q2=155 n_q3=309 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8AwYivXccL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, bad_region=1510, passed=7060
Got 7060 stars (including 5251 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7060 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1610887.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.855000 --output scan_ucac5_1610887.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 945 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1610887.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.855000 --output scan_ucac5_1610887.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 946 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=316 n_q2=158 n_q3=304 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CTQZF2nrGg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=366, bad_region=1501, passed=7027
Got 7027 stars (including 5230 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7027 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1610912.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.855000 --output scan_ucac5_1610912.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 944 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1610912.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.855000 --output scan_ucac5_1610912.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 945 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=318 n_q2=158 n_q3=301 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.305
ref2=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.173
new1=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.165
new2=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.115
reference average sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.239
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20339_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 20339_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 11.96 | 15:53:25.83 +53:09:23.9 | 2819 3624 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:53:25.82 +53:09:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:45.497 +54:00:21.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:31:45.497 +54:00:21.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:43.318 +54:00:37.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:31:43.318 +54:00:37.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0148 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:31:45.497 +54:00:21.23
Second-epoch second image center 15:31:43.318 +54:00:37.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00700 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xg3FN33KX3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2XZKgiwZPH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wwdH5zyKb2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4JX1EyuK2p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43365 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec +48.1644 to +59.2687 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec 48.1644 to 59.2687 deg
Loaded 6233 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4200 out of 4603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4603 out of 43365 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.630100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.630100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43365 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec +48.1644 to +59.2687 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec 48.1644 to 59.2687 deg
Loaded 6233 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4200 out of 4603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4603 out of 43365 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43531 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1483 to 248.0272 deg, Dec +48.1643 to +59.2726 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1483 to 248.0272 deg, Dec 48.1643 to 59.2726 deg
Loaded 6237 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4222 out of 4601 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4601 out of 43531 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
2.2 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
2.2 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
15.5 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xg3FN33KX3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1952, bad_region=6919, passed=43342
Got 43342 stars (including 34786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1687687.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.860000 --output scan_ucac5_1687687.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 942 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1687687.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.860000 --output scan_ucac5_1687687.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 942 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37025 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37025 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=321 n_q2=157 n_q3=303 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.350
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2XZKgiwZPH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1994, bad_region=6964, passed=43516
Got 43516 stars (including 34871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43516 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1687695.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.860000 --output scan_ucac5_1687695.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 942 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1687695.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.860000 --output scan_ucac5_1687695.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 942 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=322 n_q2=160 n_q3=299 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wwdH5zyKb2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1690, bad_region=5292, passed=37950
Got 37950 stars (including 31390 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37950 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1687706.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.855000 --output scan_ucac5_1687706.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 941 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1687706.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.855000 --output scan_ucac5_1687706.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 942 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=322 n_q2=155 n_q3=297 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4JX1EyuK2p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1697, bad_region=5245, passed=37774
Got 37774 stars (including 31247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37774 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1687722.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.855000 --output scan_ucac5_1687722.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 941 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1687722.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.855000 --output scan_ucac5_1687722.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 941 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=317 n_q2=157 n_q3=299 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:08:56.81 +50:44:15.6: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:14:18.49 +51:57:15.6: 14.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:36:06.75 +49:44:04.8: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:04:59.97 +52:46:38.8: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:10:01.05 +52:26:33.2: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:08:56.81 +50:44:15.6: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:56.81 +50:44:15.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0845 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:00:28.42 +50:50:36.2: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:54:32.79 +49:39:20.4: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:15:17.72 +56:04:21.0: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:14:18.49 +51:57:15.6: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:04:59.97 +52:46:38.8: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:36:06.75 +49:44:04.8: 14.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:10:01.05 +52:26:33.2: 15.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:18.49 +51:57:15.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5693 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:59.97 +52:46:38.8: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6434 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:06.75 +49:44:04.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5827 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:01.05 +52:26:33.2: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8315 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:42:15.87 +52:17:16.6: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:55:04.66 +49:56:05.1: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:00:28.42 +50:50:36.2: 14.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:54:32.79 +49:39:20.4: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:28.42 +50:50:36.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7314 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:32.79 +49:39:20.4: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0065 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:15:17.72 +56:04:21.0: 15.47 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:17.72 +56:04:21.0: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9122 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:42:15.87 +52:17:16.6: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:00:06.23 +57:09:08.2: 15.40 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:15.87 +52:17:16.6: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.9855 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:55:04.66 +49:56:05.1: 15.50 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:04.66 +49:56:05.1: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0715 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:36:18.00 +51:00:19.4: 15.78 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:43:00.71 +52:20:06.4: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:13:41.12 +57:36:57.3: 15.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:56:15.28 +52:32:46.5: 15.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:00:06.23 +57:09:08.2: 15.47 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:06.23 +57:09:08.2: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0105 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:24:41.98 +57:52:33.4: 15.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:43:00.71 +52:20:06.4: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:00.71 +52:20:06.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9432 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:36:18.00 +51:00:19.4: 15.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:56:15.28 +52:32:46.5: 15.79 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:13:41.12 +57:36:57.3: 15.43 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:18.00 +51:00:19.4: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1464 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:15.28 +52:32:46.5: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0641 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:41.12 +57:36:57.3: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0306 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:59:36.95 +57:02:37.3: 15.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:07:23.25 +50:58:22.1: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:04:44.47 +57:27:14.9: 15.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:07:11.53 +55:02:38.0: 15.35 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:24:41.98 +57:52:33.4: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:41.98 +57:52:33.4: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0192 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:59:36.95 +57:02:37.3: 15.39 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:36.95 +57:02:37.3: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1161 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:07:23.25 +50:58:22.1: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:04:44.47 +57:27:14.9: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:23.25 +50:58:22.1: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1756 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:03:45.21 +56:16:34.4: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:07:11.53 +55:02:38.0: 15.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:44.47 +57:27:14.9: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0543 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:11.53 +55:02:38.0: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1257 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:03:45.21 +56:16:34.4: 15.71 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:45.21 +56:16:34.4: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0234 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52681_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52681_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.75 | 15:43:49.59 +52:23:14.6 | 3667 4146 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:43:49.61 +52:23:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52688_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.46 | 15:58:05.92 +51:01:03.2 | 2265 4878 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:58:05.89 +51:01:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52723_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 12.87 | 15:38:19.40 +50:20:21.1 | 4137 5406 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:38:19.47 +50:20:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52727_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52727_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 12.92 | 15:57:10.61 +57:49:14.9 | 2750 0776 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52779_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.07 | 15:43:32.85 +51:04:33.7 | 3654 4941 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:43:32.89 +51:04:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52790_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52790_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 13.85 | 16:19:47.43 +55:50:48.7 | 0711 1700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52798_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52798_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.08 | 16:08:56.90 +50:44:15.2 | 1209 4928 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.09 | 16:08:56.72 +50:44:16.0 | 1205 4930 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52813_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52813_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.24 | 15:46:54.59 +53:36:26.8 | 3426 3393 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:46:54.59 +53:36:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52818_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.28 | 15:39:39.88 +57:08:11.6 | 4149 1290 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:39:40.05 +57:08:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52830_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.35 | 15:59:54.94 +49:49:22.5 | 2014 5586 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:59:55.02 +49:49:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52831_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.49 | 16:07:40.21 +57:21:27.2 | 1865 0953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52840_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52840_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.18 | 15:37:36.86 +56:00:32.8 | 4299 1978 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:37:36.83 +56:00:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52845_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52845_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.45 | 16:06:53.78 +55:52:06.8 | 1811 1861 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52855_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.58 | 15:36:06.66 +49:44:05.1 | 4346 5777 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.58 | 15:36:06.84 +49:44:04.5 | 4342 5779 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52856_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52856_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.53 | 16:00:50.37 +55:43:08.1 | 2316 2015 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52857_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52857_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.51 | 16:14:18.48 +51:57:15.6 | 0810 4121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.65 | 16:14:18.50 +51:57:15.5 | 0806 4123 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52863_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.89 | 15:52:20.08 +58:00:39.1 | 3150 0697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52878_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.63 | 16:05:00.03 +52:46:37.7 | 1743 3743 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.66 | 16:04:59.91 +52:46:39.8 | 1740 3745 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52902_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52902_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.79 | 15:10:01.05 +52:26:33.4 | 6787 4078 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.88 | 15:10:01.04 +52:26:33.0 | 6784 4081 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52905_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52905_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.88 | 16:18:43.81 +56:41:29.0 | 0890 1208 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52918_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52918_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.75 | 16:00:28.34 +50:50:36.9 | 2031 4959 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.72 | 16:00:28.50 +50:50:35.4 | 2027 4962 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52939_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.81 | 16:12:51.96 +55:51:24.5 | 1302 1794 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52972_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52972_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.85 | 16:15:17.91 +56:04:21.3 | 1119 1628 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.00 | 16:15:17.53 +56:04:20.7 | 1116 1631 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52975_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52975_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.99 | 15:54:32.95 +49:39:20.2 | 2534 5733 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.03 | 15:54:32.63 +49:39:20.5 | 2531 5735 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52994_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.95 | 15:42:15.91 +52:17:15.5 | 3811 4210 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.02 | 15:42:15.83 +52:17:17.6 | 3808 4212 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 52996_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.94 | 15:55:04.73 +49:56:04.0 | 2498 5559 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.32 | 15:55:04.59 +49:56:06.2 | 2494 5561 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53000_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.95 | 16:00:06.35 +57:09:07.5 | 2474 1153 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.12 | 16:00:06.11 +57:09:08.9 | 2471 1156 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53003_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53003_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 15.03 | 16:13:41.03 +57:36:58.0 | 1400 0719 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.04 | 16:13:41.22 +57:36:56.7 | 1397 0722 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53005_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 15.09 | 15:36:17.91 +51:00:20.1 | 4345 5004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.35 | 15:36:18.09 +51:00:18.7 | 4341 5007 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53017_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.99 | 15:56:15.27 +52:32:45.0 | 2532 3968 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.21 | 15:56:15.28 +52:32:48.0 | 2528 3970 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53021_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53021_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 14.97 | 15:43:00.75 +52:20:06.6 | 3743 4178 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.92 | 15:43:00.66 +52:20:06.2 | 3740 4181 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53037_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 14.75 | 15:49:46.84 +52:17:40.2 | 3113 4170 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:49:46.88 +52:17:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53040_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.02 | 16:05:41.80 +51:00:52.0 | 1540 4802 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53049_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 15.02 | 15:24:42.20 +57:52:33.8 | 5373 0847 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.02 | 15:24:41.76 +57:52:33.0 | 5370 0850 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53056_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53056_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 15.13 | 15:59:36.87 +57:02:37.1 | 2507 1223 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.08 | 15:59:37.03 +57:02:37.6 | 2504 1226 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53063_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53063_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 15.06 | 16:04:44.34 +57:27:16.0 | 2115 0924 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.05 | 16:04:44.60 +57:27:13.9 | 2112 0927 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53065_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 15.08 | 16:07:23.34 +50:58:20.6 | 1378 4805 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.38 | 16:07:23.16 +50:58:23.5 | 1375 4807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53071_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 15.05 | 16:07:11.68 +55:02:38.4 | 1723 2352 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.24 | 16:07:11.39 +55:02:37.6 | 1720 2355 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53073_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 53073_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 07.26242 | 2461228.76242 | 15.02 | 16:03:45.20 +56:16:34.4 | 2111 1647 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-17-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 15.03 | 16:03:45.22 +56:16:34.4 | 2108 1649 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25328_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221
The candidate 25328_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 07.26289 | 2461228.76289 | 11.97 | 15:53:25.81 +53:09:23.8 | 2819 3624 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_013818_TTUQ2b1x1_4179699_xYiLbTfD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-18-23_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0221.fits |
**** FOUND 15:53:25.81 +53:09:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Dra-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461228.76242259 -observatory V36
07:39:56.37 +17:22:32.4 Mercury (4.0mag)
09:58:33.68 +14:00:46.4 Venus (-4.1mag)
04:15:01.08 +21:00:58.7 Mars (1.3mag)
08:13:52.57 +20:20:12.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:28.76 +03:19:05.4 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:06:37.90 +20:43:25.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:17:01.75 +00:20:53.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:31:11.73 -23:16:38.9 Pluto (14.4mag)
00:27:30.19 +05:32:26.1 Moon (-10.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 7 02:33 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461228.76242259:
08:13:57.27 +20:19:54.9 Io (6.1mag)
08:14:02.34 +20:19:38.2 Europa (6.3mag)
08:13:38.01 +20:21:07.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:14:14.95 +20:18:56.7 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:12:32.89 +20:03:08.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:13:56.98 +20:19:56.7 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:11:55.39 +20:08:23.2 Elara (17.6mag)
08:17:18.74 +20:16:02.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:19:00.83 +20:24:52.1 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:19.57 +03:19:29.0 Titan (8.5mag)
00:55:30.87 +03:18:51.8 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:55:02.76 +03:18:51.1 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:55:44.27 +03:18:57.2 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:55:33.61 +03:16:46.4 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 7 02:33 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461228.76242259:
17:42:51.34 -33:37:05.1 JWST
13:55:55.49 +56:32:35.7 Chandra
09:12:30.09 -52:13:30.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 7 02:33 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461228.76242259 -observatory V36
02:31:49.63 +14:03:06.7 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:20:22.62 -34:15:56.5 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:22:34.42 -68:05:47.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:59:43.11 +32:23:43.7 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:04:01.83 +16:03:25.4 18.0mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
01:28:55.50 +01:31:09.6 15.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:01:18.51 +32:16:44.6 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:08:50.67 +26:57:02.5 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:52:50.85 +29:55:03.8 16.8mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:07:45.42 +04:56:04.6 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:09:08.02 +21:24:04.3 17.9mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:11:57.46 -11:19:18.5 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:52:48.95 +67:37:13.7 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:37:11.40 -09:45:08.7 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
07:55:21.80 +65:32:48.8 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:28:43.17 +29:50:27.1 14.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:17:53.64 +15:14:10.0 17.5mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:45:09.24 +38:45:31.4 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:50:38.14 +45:31:24.5 17.9mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
04:46:41.88 -13:56:41.8 15.8mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:31:58.67 +29:35:03.8 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:12:06.01 -12:37:42.9 16.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:52:34.37 +22:33:47.8 17.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:43:39.40 +04:03:44.3 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:00:54.92 +79:01:05.0 17.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:42:50.05 +45:06:01.1 16.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:23:36.57 +03:58:06.3 16.9mag A/2026 E1
21:14:05.67 -14:02:09.7 7.4mag 10P/Tempel
11:12:02.92 -01:45:39.2 16.1mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:55:40.68 +29:12:41.6 17.8mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:01:36.23 +14:59:27.4 17.0mag 63P/Wild
00:46:54.69 -05:08:29.0 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
08:17:14.56 +34:20:32.4 17.8mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
04:19:54.03 +20:00:02.0 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:17:11.37 +10:09:52.7 16.2mag 88P/Howell
06:26:13.86 +30:41:30.0 15.6mag 93P/Lovas
04:11:01.81 +30:57:41.4 16.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:01:07.90 +31:01:51.7 15.3mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:42:23.66 +02:26:59.0 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos
04:46:44.25 +20:42:56.1 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:30:23.15 +19:43:35.9 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
00:00:36.49 +02:48:13.4 18.0mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
07:01:51.06 +17:40:12.6 15.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:15:26.40 -21:22:33.0 15.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
05:21:57.39 +33:14:19.6 15.3mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:11:26.06 +13:18:02.4 15.0mag 169P/NEAT
01:33:32.55 +07:13:39.6 17.7mag 220P/McNaught
16:36:33.56 -08:16:42.5 16.9mag 235P/LINEAR
08:38:43.40 +33:34:32.3 17.9mag 240P/NEAT
20:43:13.80 -48:51:18.4 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
01:50:41.72 +10:38:52.6 15.7mag 260P/McNaught
05:27:53.32 +36:34:10.3 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR
15:06:52.12 +06:19:22.9 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski
08:31:50.45 +19:47:57.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:46:53.21 +39:28:13.7 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jul 7 02:33 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 2026-06-26.38 16.07
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 2026-06-26.38 16.07
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 7 02:33 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 7 02:33 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
11:52:32.131 -13:45:09.94 AT 2026rls 2026-04-22.31 21.02
16:41:34.520 +44:47:03.76 AT 2026rlr 2026-04-23.49 21.03
11:22:02.700 -24:23:51.28 AT 2026rlq 2026-05-07.27 20.73
13:17:29.523 +09:10:51.61 AT 2026rlp 2026-05-21.26 20.85
20:21:54.334 -21:13:51.37 AT 2026rlo 2026-05-20.57 19.91
20:13:59.295 -23:24:43.54 AT 2026rln 2026-05-20.56 20.51
20:30:30.579 -12:41:46.85 AT 2026rlm 2026-05-21.56 19.73
20:43:01.499 -03:15:22.31 AT 2026rll 2026-05-24.58 20.5
13:57:02.714 -12:01:29.35 AT 2026rlk 2026-06-08.30 20.84
13:16:56.704 -11:47:53.30 AT 2026rlj 2026-06-08.28 20
13:42:35.447 -10:35:49.51 AT 2026rli 2026-06-08.28 21.14
14:25:38.943 +19:01:07.83 AT 2026rlh 2026-06-08.40 20.5
16:13:48.682 +00:00:26.76 AT 2026rlg 2026-04-22.57 20.84
22:15:54.112 +23:40:17.72 AT 2026rlf 2026-06-14.54 20.59
13:39:57.504 +14:08:32.07 AT 2026rle 2026-04-20.33 19.97
16:39:17.605 +34:01:16.25 AT 2026rld 2026-07-03.92 19.4
17:35:07.524 +18:54:37.37 AT 2026rlc 2026-06-24.12 20.26
14:58:06.312 +23:48:04.39 AT 2026rlb 2026-07-04.89 19.46
16:59:08.261 +40:26:51.67 AT 2026rla 2026-07-03.93 20.2
02:22:22.889 -51:06:30.47 AT 2026rkz 2026-07-04.82 18.29
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 29K Jul 7 02:33 tns_transients_list.txt