Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 07.2681  2461228.7681   9.87  20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6
 18.11704 -38.76710 galactic  Mic  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
324 Bamberga                 1      1       1  10.0    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6:  14.70 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6:  14.69 +/- 0.33  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.69 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits


fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits  wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -crosshair 3673.30151 2134.85840 image    wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -crosshair 3678.80811 2132.20459 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 07.26811 20 58 25.11 -27 34 39.6           9.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 07.26781 20 58 25.12 -27 34 39.6           9.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 07 07.26840 20 58 25.10 -27 34 39.6           9.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 07 07.2681*  20 58 25.11 -27 34 39.6   9.9 U             Mic       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7681,9.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2681 9.87CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 07.2681  2461228.7681  12.80  21:07:16.99 -24:28:11.7
 22.66075 -39.89594 galactic  Cap  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
388 Charybdis               -1      1       1  13.0    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:07:16.99 -24:28:11.7:  14.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:07:16.99 -24:28:11.7:  14.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits


fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits  wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -crosshair 4742.19922 4083.15723 image    wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -crosshair 4747.91309 4080.51172 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 07.26811 21 07 16.99 -24 28 11.7          12.8 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 07.26781 21 07 16.98 -24 28 11.8          12.8 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 07 07.26840 21 07 17.00 -24 28 11.7          12.8 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 07 07.2681*  21 07 16.99 -24 28 11.7  12.8 U             Cap       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7681,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2681 12.80CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 07.2681  2461228.7681  12.83  21:04:29.22 -28:47:11.8
 16.98624 -40.34498 galactic  Mic  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
769 Tatjana                  0      0       0  13.0     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:04:29.22 -28:47:11.8:  14.81 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:04:29.22 -28:47:11.8:  14.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits


fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits  wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -crosshair 4528.20703 1467.16260 image    wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -crosshair 4533.76758 1464.24329 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 07.26811 21 04 29.22 -28 47 11.8          12.8 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 07 07.26781 21 04 29.22 -28 47 11.1          12.8 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 07 07.26840 21 04 29.23 -28 47 12.5          12.8 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 07 07.2681*  21 04 29.22 -28 47 11.8  12.8 U             Mic       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7681,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2681 12.83CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
First image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Last  image: 2461228.76839630 07.07.2026 06:26:19.440   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4536
Objects passed selection criteria:  4534
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4396.75
Average stars matched: 4221 (96.0027 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   110800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jul  6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Jul  7 01:32:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
First image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Last  image: 2461228.76839630 07.07.2026 06:26:19.440   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 25
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  29703
Objects passed selection criteria:  29656
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 27821.2
Average stars matched: 26714.5 (96.0219 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   133124 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jul  6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Jul  7 01:36:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cap-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cap-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cap-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 231949 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 231949 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits_preview.png'

Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


renamed 'Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits_preview.png'

Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2584.5597
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 642.9504
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3508.8619
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 944.5941
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3505.9944
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 944.0673
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.35762
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-07T01:25:29.1700245' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-07T06:25:29.1700245' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61228.2676987271 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-07T06:25:39.0696673' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61228.2678132984 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      316.79879356439 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -25.9998343983745 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =              20.5625 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     144.244722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.82734413580177 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cap-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '21 07 12'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-26 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29486 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29486 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 16.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 36.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =              9.00072 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/d_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits :)

Spent 0.670962 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/d_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-07T01:26:19.4400811' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-07T06:26:19.4400811' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61228.2682805555 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-07T06:26:29.3408945' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61228.2683951389 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     316.798793524056 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -25.9998344033797 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     20.6636111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     144.413888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.81432551247334 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cap-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '21 07 12'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-26 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29486 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29486 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 16.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 36.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =              9.00072 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/d_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits :)

Spent 0.679933 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/d_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits



fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.76781447
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.240 -25:56:56.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:14.240 -25:56:56.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:11.816 -25:56:38.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:11.816 -25:56:38.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0558 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  21:07:14.240 -25:56:56.35
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:11.816 -25:56:38.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01039 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JxJZ3xyXFm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eYNTFDd25G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XNRZU8Pmhp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mSaFty4bX0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3769 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3769 out of 4477 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.487600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.487600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.09

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.09

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3769 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3769 out of 4477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 4783 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.3753 to 325.5913 deg, Dec -31.4689 to -20.1665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.3753 to 325.5913 deg, Dec -31.4689 to -20.1665 deg
Loaded 7549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3915 out of 3964 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3964 out of 4783 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.3 pix  Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
 2.5 pix  Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
 3.4 pix  fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 3.4 pix  fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
 2.5 pix  wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.1 mag.  Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
 14.1 mag.  Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
 13.8 mag.  fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 13.8 mag.  fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.8 (SNR )  11.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JxJZ3xyXFm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, bad_region=0, passed=4477
Got 4477 stars (including 4173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3618628.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.900000 --output scan_ucac5_3618628.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 962 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3618628.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.900000 --output scan_ucac5_3618628.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 962 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.595 n_q1=253 n_q2=210 n_q3=264 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eYNTFDd25G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, bad_region=0, passed=4783
Got 4783 stars (including 4491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4783 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3618640.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.100000 --output scan_ucac5_3618640.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 961 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3618640.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.100000 --output scan_ucac5_3618640.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 960 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=270 n_q2=190 n_q3=286 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XNRZU8Pmhp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=241, bad_region=0, passed=4197
Got 4197 stars (including 3954 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4197 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3618654.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.080000 --output scan_ucac5_3618654.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 960 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3618654.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.080000 --output scan_ucac5_3618654.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 960 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=253 n_q2=197 n_q3=289 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mSaFty4bX0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=236, bad_region=0, passed=4211
Got 4211 stars (including 3971 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4211 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3618672.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.080000 --output scan_ucac5_3618672.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 962 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3618672.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.080000 --output scan_ucac5_3618672.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 962 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=256 n_q2=194 n_q3=291 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.466 worst_q_ratio=1.277
ref2=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.032
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.215
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.200
reference average sigma_overall=0.3795 worst_q_ratio=1.1545
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6:  14.70 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:03:31.58 -24:55:54.7:  11.81 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:03:31.58 -24:55:54.7:  11.66 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6:  14.69 +/- 0.33  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.69 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:31.58 -24:55:54.7: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2564 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=9.8658 delta=4.82 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20636.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20636_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 20636_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20645_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20645_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    11.04    20:54:26.49 -27:44:15.7   3157 1992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  20:54:26.49 -27:44:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20648_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20648_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    11.24    21:03:31.57 -24:55:54.5   4247 3773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    11.27    21:03:31.58 -24:55:54.8   4253 3770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00958_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 00958_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    8.49    20:40:03.07 -28:47:30.8   1303 1159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  20:40:03.06 -28:47:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20282_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20282_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    10.52    20:43:48.83 -25:46:55.9   1614 3028   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  20:43:48.85 -25:46:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.240 -25:56:56.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:14.240 -25:56:56.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:11.816 -25:56:38.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:11.816 -25:56:38.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0558 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  21:07:14.240 -25:56:56.35
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:11.816 -25:56:38.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01039 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9zA4m10CeW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kJjDFT9x05
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E4JkA56DBM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1EUBXcae9A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Loaded 7153 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5699 out of 5990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5990 out of 31558 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.316800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.316800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.24

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.24

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Loaded 7153 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5699 out of 5990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5990 out of 31558 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 32134 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.3572 to 325.6156 deg, Dec -31.4754 to -20.1015 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.3572 to 325.6156 deg, Dec -31.4754 to -20.1015 deg
Loaded 7617 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5799 out of 6049 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6049 out of 32134 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
 2.4 pix  Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
 3.1 pix  fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 3.1 pix  fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
 2.4 pix  wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.2 mag.  Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
 14.2 mag.  Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
 13.9 mag.  fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 13.9 mag.  fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.9 (SNR )  13.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9zA4m10CeW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1200, bad_region=0, passed=31549
Got 31549 stars (including 30311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31549 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3798891.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.900000 --output scan_ucac5_3798891.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 961 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3798891.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.900000 --output scan_ucac5_3798891.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 961 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.590 n_q1=263 n_q2=198 n_q3=258 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kJjDFT9x05 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=976, bad_region=3, passed=32132
Got 32132 stars (including 31110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3798899.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.100000 --output scan_ucac5_3798899.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 959 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3798899.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.100000 --output scan_ucac5_3798899.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 958 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=261 n_q2=183 n_q3=290 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.E4JkA56DBM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=753, bad_region=2, passed=24168
Got 24168 stars (including 23377 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24168 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3798908.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.080000 --output scan_ucac5_3798908.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 957 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3798908.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.080000 --output scan_ucac5_3798908.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 957 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=242 n_q2=186 n_q3=293 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1EUBXcae9A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=701, bad_region=0, passed=24232
Got 24232 stars (including 23488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24232 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3798922.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.080000 --output scan_ucac5_3798922.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 958 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_3798922.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.080000 --output scan_ucac5_3798922.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 958 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=241 n_q2=187 n_q3=296 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:43:30.95 -22:27:51.0:  12.14 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:06:18.79 -27:29:31.2:  12.87 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:53:35.02 -22:26:04.9:  12.56 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:53:03.03 -23:12:32.8:  13.40 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:39:41.12 -20:56:54.3:  11.91 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:07:16.99 -24:28:11.7:  14.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:40:04.35 -24:10:23.7:  10.67 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:50:52.69 -21:19:51.8:  12.95 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:04:29.22 -28:47:11.8:  14.81 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:07:16.99 -24:28:11.7:  14.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:06:18.79 -27:29:31.2:  12.87 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:39:41.12 -20:56:54.3:  11.80 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:18.79 -27:29:31.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9242 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:53:35.02 -22:26:04.9:  12.47 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:41.12 -20:56:54.3: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9104 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:35.02 -22:26:04.9: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4937 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:53:03.03 -23:12:32.8:  13.20 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:43:30.95 -22:27:51.0:  12.10 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:40:04.35 -24:10:23.7:  10.72 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:03.03 -23:12:32.8: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4060 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:30.95 -22:27:51.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1566 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:04.35 -24:10:23.7: ref_mag=10.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9234 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:39:18.11 -24:28:39.2:  13.53 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:50:52.69 -21:19:51.8:  13.08 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:04:29.22 -28:47:11.8:  14.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:52.69 -21:19:51.8: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1633 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:39:18.11 -24:28:39.2:  13.53 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:18.11 -24:28:39.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3991 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:32:29.28 -26:05:00.0:  13.70 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:32:29.28 -26:05:00.0:  13.82 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:29.28 -26:05:00.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4339 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54061.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54066.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53986_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53986_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    13.56    20:53:03.06 -23:12:34.2   2729 4698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    13.32    20:53:03.00 -23:12:31.4   2734 4696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53994_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53994_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    12.92    21:06:18.69 -27:29:31.3   4721 2261   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    12.93    21:06:18.88 -27:29:31.1   4727 2258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54003_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54003_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    9.80    20:58:25.10 -27:34:39.6   3679 2132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54012_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54012_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    10.88    20:40:04.37 -24:10:23.9   0988 3944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    10.98    20:40:04.33 -24:10:23.6   0994 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54022_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    11.91    20:39:41.14 -20:56:54.7   0710 5891   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    11.91    20:39:41.09 -20:56:53.9   0716 5889   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54027_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54027_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    12.13    20:43:30.97 -22:27:51.0   1355 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    12.19    20:43:30.94 -22:27:51.0   1361 5023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54037_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54037_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    12.47    21:14:45.42 -27:58:42.5   5866 2027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  21:14:45.45 -27:58:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54039_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54039_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    12.49    20:53:35.03 -22:26:05.0   2762 5171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    12.49    20:53:35.01 -22:26:04.9   2768 5169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54059_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54059_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    12.87    21:01:49.41 -20:50:22.0   3847 6222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  21:01:49.38 -20:50:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54061_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 54061_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 54066_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54068_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54068_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    12.99    20:37:23.40 -30:10:23.1   1044 0278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  20:37:23.31 -30:10:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54078_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54078_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    13.19    20:50:52.74 -21:19:51.5   2322 5807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    13.14    20:50:52.65 -21:19:52.1   2328 5804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54092_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    13.32    21:39:18.19 -24:28:38.9   9157 4223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    13.51    21:39:18.03 -24:28:39.5   9163 4220   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54100_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54100_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 07 07.26781    2461228.76781    13.42    21:32:29.34 -26:05:03.5   8217 3241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    13.46    21:32:29.22 -26:04:56.5   8223 3239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30265_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 30265_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    11.68    21:07:36.63 -23:55:12.8   4773 4414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  21:07:36.62 -23:55:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08184_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 08184_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    11.01    20:54:26.49 -27:44:15.7   3157 1992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  20:54:26.49 -27:44:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04897_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 04897_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    8.39    20:40:03.07 -28:47:30.8   1303 1159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  20:40:03.07 -28:47:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13873_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 13873_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 07 07.26840    2461228.76840    10.47    20:43:48.84 -25:46:56.0   1614 3028   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_013035_TTUQ1b1x1_3559564_CtFjRVHM/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-26-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits

**** FOUND  20:43:48.85 -25:46:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6
21:07:16.99 -24:28:11.7
21:04:29.22 -28:47:11.8
########### Completed Cap-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6
21:07:16.99 -24:28:11.7
21:04:29.22 -28:47:11.8
###################################################################################
20:58:25.11 -27:34:39.6  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
21:07:16.99 -24:28:11.7  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
21:04:29.22 -28:47:11.8  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461228.76781447 -observatory V36
07:39:55.68 +17:22:30.1 Mercury (4.0mag)
09:58:35.07 +14:00:38.1 Venus (-4.1mag)
04:15:02.05 +21:01:01.4 Mars (1.3mag)
08:13:52.87 +20:20:11.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:28.80 +03:19:05.6 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:06:37.97 +20:43:25.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:17:01.75 +00:20:53.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:31:11.71 -23:16:39.1 Pluto (14.4mag)
00:27:45.69 +05:34:34.5 Moon (-10.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul  7 01:32 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461228.76781447:
08:13:57.46 +20:19:54.4 Io (6.1mag)
08:14:02.69 +20:19:37.1 Europa (6.3mag)
08:13:38.32 +20:21:06.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:14:15.28 +20:18:55.6 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:12:33.16 +20:03:07.7 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:13:57.20 +20:19:56.1 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:11:55.67 +20:08:22.3 Elara (17.6mag)
08:17:19.04 +20:16:01.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:19:01.11 +20:24:51.3 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:19.59 +03:19:29.2 Titan (8.5mag)
00:55:30.95 +03:18:52.0 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:55:02.80 +03:18:51.2 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:55:44.31 +03:18:57.4 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:55:33.65 +03:16:46.5 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul  7 01:33 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461228.76781447:
17:42:50.00 -33:36:59.4 JWST
13:58:44.53 +56:25:29.4 Chandra
09:14:42.15 -52:26:57.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul  7 01:33 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461228.76781447 -observatory V36
02:31:50.10 +14:03:09.1 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:20:22.35 -34:15:57.2 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:22:34.75 -68:05:47.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:59:43.23 +32:23:44.0 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:04:01.73 +16:03:25.4 18.0mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
01:28:57.62 +01:31:54.6 15.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:01:18.33 +32:16:44.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:08:51.04 +26:57:02.3 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:52:51.13 +29:55:02.9 16.8mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:07:45.63 +04:56:05.0 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:09:07.82 +21:24:03.7 17.9mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:11:57.42 -11:19:18.9 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:52:48.59 +67:37:13.9 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:37:10.71 -09:45:10.8 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
07:55:22.35 +65:32:49.8 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:28:43.60 +29:50:28.2 14.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:17:53.47 +15:14:10.7 17.5mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:45:08.84 +38:45:35.5 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:50:37.83 +45:31:27.6 17.9mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
04:46:42.19 -13:56:40.9 15.8mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:31:58.95 +29:35:00.6 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:12:06.25 -12:37:44.5 16.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:52:34.74 +22:33:47.0 17.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:43:39.49 +04:03:43.6 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:00:53.94 +79:01:05.8 17.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:42:50.43 +45:06:02.0 16.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:23:36.77 +03:58:10.0 16.9mag A/2026 E1
21:14:06.17 -14:02:16.1 7.4mag 10P/Tempel
11:12:03.07 -01:45:40.0 16.1mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:55:41.16 +29:12:43.8 17.8mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:01:36.92 +14:59:21.2 17.0mag 63P/Wild
00:46:54.85 -05:08:28.6 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
08:17:15.59 +34:20:31.8 17.8mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
04:19:54.82 +20:00:03.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:17:11.92 +10:09:55.6 16.2mag 88P/Howell
06:26:14.85 +30:41:29.1 15.6mag 93P/Lovas
04:11:02.86 +30:57:42.6 16.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:01:08.70 +31:01:49.7 15.3mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:42:24.26 +02:26:51.0 16.8mag 124P/Mrkos
04:46:44.78 +20:42:56.7 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:30:23.77 +19:43:35.9 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
00:00:36.59 +02:48:14.3 18.0mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
07:01:52.31 +17:40:08.6 15.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:15:26.56 -21:22:31.3 15.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
05:21:58.56 +33:14:24.3 15.3mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:11:25.36 +13:18:13.1 15.0mag 169P/NEAT
01:33:33.35 +07:13:42.1 17.7mag 220P/McNaught
16:36:33.48 -08:16:43.1 16.9mag 235P/LINEAR
08:38:44.09 +33:34:30.6 17.9mag 240P/NEAT
20:43:13.69 -48:51:23.2 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
01:50:42.62 +10:39:01.8 15.7mag 260P/McNaught
05:27:54.30 +36:34:12.1 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR
15:06:52.08 +06:19:21.3 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski
08:31:50.74 +19:47:56.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:46:53.73 +39:28:12.1 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jul  7 01:33 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70    2026-06-26.38 16.07
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70    2026-06-26.38 16.07
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul  7 01:32 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul  7 01:32 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:15:54.112 +23:40:17.72  AT 2026rlf  2026-06-14.54 20.59
13:39:57.504 +14:08:32.07  AT 2026rle  2026-04-20.33 19.97
16:39:17.620 +34:01:15.85  AT 2026rld  2026-07-03.92 19.4
17:35:07.524 +18:54:37.37  AT 2026rlc  2026-06-24.12 20.26
14:58:06.312 +23:48:04.39  AT 2026rlb  2026-07-04.89 19.46
16:59:08.261 +40:26:51.67  AT 2026rla  2026-07-03.93 20.2
02:22:22.889 -51:06:30.47  AT 2026rkz  2026-07-04.82 18.29
01:46:17.235 -45:18:42.90  AT 2026rky  2026-07-04.78 18.97
01:02:13.157 -36:54:08.07  AT 2026rkx  2026-06-23.82 19.78
01:16:38.955 -56:27:50.31  AT 2026rkw  2026-07-04.79 19.41
02:29:40.116 -17:03:00.10  AT 2026rkv  2026-07-04.77 18.9
01:30:01.164 -23:33:20.03  AT 2026rku  2026-07-04.79 19.06
02:00:09.431 -09:14:06.58  AT 2026rkt  2026-07-04.76 18.7
23:01:15.964 -41:23:13.29  AT 2026rks  2026-07-04.71 19.12
23:49:12.797 -44:43:41.38  AT 2026rkr  2026-06-23.78 19.25
01:59:46.765 -28:13:34.48  AT 2026rkq  2026-06-23.83 19.53
16:04:22.329 -03:33:42.24  AT 2026rkp  2026-07-04.33 19.2495
17:19:50.362 +13:25:17.31  AT 2026rko  2026-07-03.23 20.2881
15:38:45.495 +11:20:25.67  AT 2026rkn  2026-06-28.23 19.8646
06:20:06.425 -69:16:00.07  AT 2026rkm  2026-06-30.42 18.066
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 29K Jul  7 01:32 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Jul  7 01:32:34 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 6s (0.10 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 35s (0.58 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 169s (2.82 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 222s (3.70 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 10 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 22s (0.37 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 153s (2.55 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 10s (0.17 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 187s (3.12 min)
FIELD_Cap-05-Q1b1x1: 425s (7.08 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 427s (7.12 min)
Finished: Tue Jul  7 01:39:41 CDT 2026