This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2204 2461228.7204 10.70 15:58:40.09 -20:25:18.4
351.50030 24.31556 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 0 -1 1 10.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:40.09 -20:25:18.4: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:40.09 -20:25:18.4: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7204,10.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2204 10.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2204 2461228.7204 12.31 16:04:55.93 -21:26:53.5
351.81169 22.55174 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis -0 0 0 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:55.93 -21:26:53.5: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:55.93 -21:26:53.5: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7204,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2204 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2204 2461228.7204 13.88 16:00:24.11 -13:51:27.7
357.15275 28.51751 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis -0 1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:24.11 -13:51:27.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:24.11 -13:51:27.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7204,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2204 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2204 2461228.7204 14.05 15:54:22.03 -15:51:39.3
354.35630 28.22589 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara -0 1 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:22.03 -15:51:39.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:22.03 -15:51:39.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7204,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2204 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2204 2461228.7204 14.30 16:04:44.64 -15:48:14.5
356.31440 26.43516 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.741 Botolphia -1 1 1 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:44.64 -15:48:14.5: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:44.64 -15:48:14.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7204,14.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2204 14.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461228.72071653 07.07.2026 05:17:39.908 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7349
Objects passed selection criteria: 7323
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5887.25
Average stars matched: 5432.5 (92.2757 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 02:34:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461228.72071653 07.07.2026 05:17:39.908 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57072
Objects passed selection criteria: 56948
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46953
Average stars matched: 42661.8 (90.8605 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 151824 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 02:36:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.72015273
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.800 -17:59:47.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.800 -17:59:47.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.733 -17:59:15.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 15:59:59.733 -17:59:15.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0075 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:01.800 -17:59:47.11
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:59.733 -17:59:15.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01199 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.upN34rz36D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UyF4ZtoUcC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.70MyXKicUU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FQL0cAc8A3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.710400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.710400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5895 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4659 out of 4800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4800 out of 7612 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.upN34rz36D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, bad_region=1351, passed=7602
Got 7602 stars (including 5850 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1615553.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_1615553.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 966 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1615553.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_1615553.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 968 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=312 n_q2=210 n_q3=286 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UyF4ZtoUcC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, bad_region=1353, passed=7612
Got 7612 stars (including 5871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1615561.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_1615561.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 966 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1615561.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_1615561.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 968 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=314 n_q2=209 n_q3=284 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.70MyXKicUU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=412, bad_region=1757, passed=7385
Got 7385 stars (including 5326 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7385 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1615571.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.850000 --output scan_ucac5_1615571.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 964 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1615571.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.850000 --output scan_ucac5_1615571.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 965 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=300 n_q2=195 n_q3=280 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FQL0cAc8A3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=421, bad_region=1752, passed=7284
Got 7284 stars (including 5221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7284 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1615587.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.850000 --output scan_ucac5_1615587.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 965 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1615587.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.850000 --output scan_ucac5_1615587.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 966 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.509 n_q1=300 n_q2=200 n_q3=278 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.178
ref2=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new1=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.149
new2=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.186
reference average sigma_overall=0.4085 worst_q_ratio=1.1675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:54.85 -16:28:32.3: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:48.17 -17:00:12.6: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:11.53 -16:55:15.8: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:40.09 -20:25:18.4: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:56.87 -17:22:35.1: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:37.42 -15:52:49.5: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:27.01 -15:29:34.8: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:54.85 -16:28:32.3: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:54.85 -16:28:32.3: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8264 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:56.87 -17:22:35.1: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:56.87 -17:22:35.1: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9137 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:40.09 -20:25:18.4: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:48.17 -17:00:12.6: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:48.17 -17:00:12.6: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8881 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:11.53 -16:55:15.8: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:11.53 -16:55:15.8: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8622 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:51:37.42 -15:52:49.5: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:37.42 -15:52:49.5: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9195 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:27.01 -15:29:34.8: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:27.01 -15:29:34.8: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9275 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20650.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20585_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 20585_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.94 -21:31:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20650_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 20650_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20952_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 20952_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.95 -18:30:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21016_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21016_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.93 -16:36:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21212_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21212_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21248_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21248_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.58 -20:06:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21271_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21271_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21294_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21294_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21304_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21304_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21310_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21310_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21313_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21313_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03712_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 03712_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.77 -18:18:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:58:40.09 -20:25:18.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.800 -17:59:47.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.800 -17:59:47.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.733 -17:59:15.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 15:59:59.733 -17:59:15.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0075 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:01.800 -17:59:47.11
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:59.733 -17:59:15.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01199 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uEiAEDah5y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o0iJsp281W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3vLWepKOAT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VBM946DeF5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.536600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.536600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 58808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Loaded 5929 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4737 out of 5215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5215 out of 58808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 64 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uEiAEDah5y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2882, bad_region=9662, passed=59407
Got 59407 stars (including 47245 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59407 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1683885.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_1683885.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 968 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1683885.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_1683885.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 970 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=329 n_q2=199 n_q3=277 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o0iJsp281W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2840, bad_region=9580, passed=58797
Got 58797 stars (including 46775 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1683899.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_1683899.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 965 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1683899.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.870000 --output scan_ucac5_1683899.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 965 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=329 n_q2=203 n_q3=267 n_q4=166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3vLWepKOAT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2802, bad_region=7507, passed=52297
Got 52297 stars (including 42823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1683923.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.850000 --output scan_ucac5_1683923.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 965 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1683923.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.850000 --output scan_ucac5_1683923.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 964 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.491 n_q1=292 n_q2=197 n_q3=283 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VBM946DeF5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2914, bad_region=7527, passed=52838
Got 52838 stars (including 43301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52838 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1683969.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.850000 --output scan_ucac5_1683969.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 968 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1683969.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.850000 --output scan_ucac5_1683969.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 967 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=293 n_q2=195 n_q3=286 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-16-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_003815_TTUQ2b1x1_3300315_yiLqXNSk/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:10.14 -14:28:11.7: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:17:35.59 -21:27:29.5: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:46.80 -14:29:19.4: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:55.93 -21:26:53.5: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:18.31 -19:35:46.1: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:10.84 -14:49:20.7: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:10.14 -14:28:11.7: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:46.80 -14:29:19.4: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:10.14 -14:28:11.7: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0724 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:46.80 -14:29:19.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1297 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:55.93 -21:26:53.5: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:48:14.85 -16:35:21.1: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:18.31 -19:35:46.1: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:18.31 -19:35:46.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9962 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:33.19 -21:21:38.9: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:10.84 -14:49:20.7: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:10.84 -14:49:20.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2113 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:17:35.59 -21:27:29.5: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:35.59 -21:27:29.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3508 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:48:14.85 -16:35:21.1: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:48:35.82 -19:12:13.2: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:14.85 -16:35:21.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4030 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:41:59.14 -15:33:25.6: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:33.19 -21:21:38.9: 13.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:33.19 -21:21:38.9: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5398 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:48:35.82 -19:12:13.2: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:35.82 -19:12:13.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4751 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:19.49 -19:06:35.7: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:59.30 -13:52:11.8: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:41:59.14 -15:33:25.6: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:42:00.80 -19:28:16.1: 13.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:59.14 -15:33:25.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6198 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:19.49 -19:06:35.7: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:59.30 -13:52:11.8: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:59.30 -13:52:11.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6807 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:19.49 -19:06:35.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7434 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:49:56.50 -14:03:22.3: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:14.56 -20:51:52.2: 14.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:24.11 -13:51:27.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:42:00.80 -19:28:16.1: 13.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:00.80 -19:28:16.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8188 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:49:56.50 -14:03:22.3: 13.70 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:32.71 -15:18:58.6: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:46.52 -22:15:01.6: 14.11 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:56.50 -14:03:22.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9485 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:24.11 -13:51:27.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:14.56 -20:51:52.2: 13.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:22.03 -15:51:39.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:14.56 -20:51:52.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9108 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:46.52 -22:15:01.6: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:46.52 -22:15:01.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0816 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:22.03 -15:51:39.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:32.71 -15:18:58.6: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:21.01 -18:41:10.6: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:32.71 -15:18:58.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0336 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:01.96 -13:55:03.8: 14.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:39.59 -19:00:14.7: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:39.59 -19:00:14.7: 14.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:39.59 -19:00:14.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0844 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:01.96 -13:55:03.8: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:02.52 -14:42:03.3: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:21.01 -18:41:10.6: 15.39 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:01.96 -13:55:03.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2557 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:14:21.01 -18:41:10.6: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=14.1736 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:52.70 -22:01:19.4: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:22.08 -16:17:47.7: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:44.64 -15:48:14.5: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:02.52 -14:42:03.3: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:02.52 -14:42:03.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2575 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:52.70 -22:01:19.4: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:52.70 -22:01:19.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2661 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:44.64 -15:48:14.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:55:22.08 -16:17:47.7: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:22.08 -16:17:47.7: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3781 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:32.92 -15:11:55.7: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:33.32 -14:50:00.8: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:11.79 -14:06:21.1: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:56.49 -21:38:19.2: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:33.32 -14:50:00.8: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:11.79 -14:06:21.1: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:33.32 -14:50:00.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4101 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:11.79 -14:06:21.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3819 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:24.55 -14:28:38.6: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:50:32.92 -15:11:55.7: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:44.37 -20:36:03.6: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:32.92 -15:11:55.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3311 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:56.49 -21:38:19.2: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:56.49 -21:38:19.2: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2681 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:44.37 -20:36:03.6: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:52:24.55 -14:28:38.6: 14.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:44.37 -20:36:03.6: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3292 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:24.55 -14:28:38.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4110 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:04.28 -14:51:46.0: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:10:56.54 -21:48:36.2: 14.68 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:16.34 -14:41:22.5: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:54.22 -22:08:40.2: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:10:56.54 -21:48:36.2: 14.89 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:56.54 -21:48:36.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4080 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:16:04.28 -14:51:46.0: 14.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:04.28 -14:51:46.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4768 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:36.46 -16:12:23.2: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:16:54.22 -22:08:40.2: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:54.22 -22:08:40.2: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3283 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:05.10 -15:48:38.8: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:16.34 -14:41:22.5: 15.34 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:16.34 -14:41:22.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4976 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:36.46 -16:12:23.2: 14.69 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:36.46 -16:12:23.2: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5159 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:05.10 -15:48:38.8: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:05.10 -15:48:38.8: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3846 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:36.95 -15:49:26.2: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:49:44.07 -15:03:10.0: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:32.64 -16:15:43.6: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:36.95 -15:49:26.2: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:36.95 -15:49:26.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4390 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:56.87 -20:05:48.2: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:49:44.07 -15:03:10.0: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:44.07 -15:03:10.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4348 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:09:26.32 -18:33:00.9: 15.20 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:32.64 -16:15:43.6: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:32.64 -16:15:43.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5546 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:12.06 -21:27:00.6: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:56.87 -20:05:48.2: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:56.87 -20:05:48.2: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3128 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:09:26.32 -18:33:00.9: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:26.32 -18:33:00.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5472 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:12.06 -21:27:00.6: 15.06 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:12.06 -21:27:00.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4400 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:54.53 -18:04:21.7: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:01.99 -21:03:20.3: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:19:07.60 -21:42:39.2: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:01.99 -21:03:20.3: 14.69 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:54.53 -18:04:21.7: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:01.99 -21:03:20.3: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4605 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:54.53 -18:04:21.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4776 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:10:17.58 -21:28:39.0: 15.12 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:19:07.60 -21:42:39.2: 14.74 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:13:05.77 -20:56:44.9: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:07.60 -21:42:39.2: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4640 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:07.13 -22:12:02.3: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:13:05.77 -20:56:44.9: 14.88 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:05.77 -20:56:44.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4298 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:10:17.58 -21:28:39.0: 15.25 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:17.58 -21:28:39.0: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.5917 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:16:07.13 -22:12:02.3: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:07.13 -22:12:02.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4595 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out80803.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79722.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80322.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81659.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73592_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 73592_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73597_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 73597_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73599_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 73599_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:54.58 -21:58:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73891_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 73891_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:40.10 -20:25:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74284_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 74284_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.97 -18:30:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74685_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 74685_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75120_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 75120_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76011_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 76011_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:56.15 -18:59:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76457_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 76457_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76624_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 76624_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77332_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 77332_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.76 -20:08:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77358_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 77358_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77891_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 77891_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78154_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 78154_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78264_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 78264_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78588_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 78588_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78729_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 78729_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:37.98 -14:50:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78781_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 78781_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79327_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 79327_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79375_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 79375_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79710_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 79710_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79722_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 79722_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79800_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 79800_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80322_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 80322_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80580_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 80580_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80803_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 80803_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:21.01 -18:41:10.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.362 6245855619254208512 243.58792840440 -18.68637251081 13.0364 11.1504 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.362#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80853_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 80853_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80934_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 80934_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81281_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 81281_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81490_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 81490_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81582_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 81582_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81659_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 81659_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81816_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 81816_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:11.42 -21:46:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81964_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 81964_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81989_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 81989_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81991_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 81991_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82054_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82054_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82072_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82072_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82096_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82096_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82300_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82300_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82313_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82313_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82320_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82320_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82429_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82429_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82487_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82487_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82502_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82502_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82600_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82600_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82657_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82657_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82664_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82664_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82679_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82679_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82706_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82706_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82773_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82773_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82834_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82834_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82953_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82953_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82985_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 82985_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83030_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 83030_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83116_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 83116_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83223_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 83223_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22030_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 22030_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:44.13 -19:21:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34137_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 34137_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:06.91 -17:23:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09608_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 09608_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.94 -21:31:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07980_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 07980_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:46.48 -21:49:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 17884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.58 -20:06:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46468_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 46468_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.93 -16:36:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28147_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 28147_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-17-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
