This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2286 2461228.7286 11.82 16:13:26.61 -08:52:54.6
3.85331 29.26796 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 0 -0 0 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:26.61 -08:52:54.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:26.61 -08:52:54.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7286,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2286 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2286 2461228.7286 12.13 16:22:04.69 -12:57:12.6
1.74336 25.07886 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -0 1 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:04.69 -12:57:12.6: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:04.69 -12:57:12.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7286,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2286 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2286 2461228.7286 13.34 16:37:42.39 -13:31:24.2
3.79076 21.72326 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 1 0 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:42.39 -13:31:24.2: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:42.39 -13:31:24.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7286,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2286 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2286 2461228.7286 13.77 16:31:14.20 -12:49:08.1
3.36781 23.40375 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 0 1 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:14.20 -12:49:08.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:14.20 -12:49:08.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7286,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2286 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2286 2461228.7286 14.04 16:00:23.80 -13:51:30.9
357.15104 28.51785 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis -1 -0 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:23.80 -13:51:30.9: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:23.80 -13:51:30.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7286,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2286 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7286,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2286 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461228.72888917 07.07.2026 05:29:26.024 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6376
Objects passed selection criteria: 6374
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5934.5
Average stars matched: 5766 (97.1607 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112768 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 02:33:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461228.72888917 07.07.2026 05:29:26.024 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 52968
Objects passed selection criteria: 52865
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 49591.5
Average stars matched: 47639.2 (96.0633 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 155112 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 02:37:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.72839365
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:10.800 -10:00:10.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:10.800 -10:00:10.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0176 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.809 -10:00:40.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:12.809 -10:00:40.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0293 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:10.800 -10:00:10.38
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:12.809 -10:00:40.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01167 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nhxT7iy6pY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9deyD9k0FR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HZd4GpuvwC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kzkWNFcCD3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.849000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.849000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4215 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nhxT7iy6pY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, bad_region=1847, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 6024 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1612207.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.065000 --output scan_ucac5_1612207.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 966 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1612207.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.065000 --output scan_ucac5_1612207.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 966 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=303 n_q2=181 n_q3=283 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9deyD9k0FR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=1845, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 6022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1612215.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.065000 --output scan_ucac5_1612215.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 968 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: vast.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1612215.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=47.065000 --output scan_ucac5_1612215.output http://vast.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 968 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=311 n_q2=178 n_q3=280 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HZd4GpuvwC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=336, bad_region=1786, passed=7330
Got 7330 stars (including 5279 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7330 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1612225.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.845000 --output scan_ucac5_1612225.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 967 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1612225.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.845000 --output scan_ucac5_1612225.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 967 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=291 n_q2=208 n_q3=268 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kzkWNFcCD3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=1791, passed=7279
Got 7279 stars (including 5212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: scan.sai.msu.ru
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1612245.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.845000 --output scan_ucac5_1612245.output http://scan.sai.msu.ru/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 967 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 0 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
ERROR: too few stars matched!
The local UCAC5 search failed. Trying remote UCAC5 servers (scan/vast/tau)
Searchig scan/vast for 1000 good reference stars...
Searchig UCAC5 via remote servers (scan/vast/tau)...
Trying UCAC5 server: tau.kirx.net
Running curl to query UCAC5...
Executing: curl --silent --show-error --insecure --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --max-time 600 -F file=@scan_ucac5_1612245.input -F submit=Upload Image -F brightmag=1.000000 -F faintmag=13.500000 -F searcharcsec=46.845000 --output scan_ucac5_1612245.output http://tau.kirx.net/cgi-bin/ucac5/search_ucac5.py
Matched 967 stars with UCAC5 at scan.
The remote UCAC5 server search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=291 n_q2=209 n_q3=267 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.315
ref2=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.314
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.113
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.199
reference average sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.3145
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-28-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_003411_TTUQ2b1x1_2786169_VyHa0Z6Z/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:26.59 -06:23:57.1: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:39.2: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:44.03 -09:39:06.2: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:14:43.70 -10:42:51.9: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:26.61 -08:52:54.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:04.69 -12:57:12.6: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:20:10.53 -10:25:13.1: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:25.52 -08:29:52.6: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:09.73 -08:53:55.7: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.47 -08:07:31.0: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:26.59 -06:23:57.1: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:26.59 -06:23:57.1: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2107 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:39.2: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:44.03 -09:39:06.2: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:44.03 -09:39:06.2: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1364 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:39.2: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0259 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:26.61 -08:52:54.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:04.69 -12:57:12.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:14:43.70 -10:42:51.9: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:20:10.53 -10:25:13.1: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:43.70 -10:42:51.9: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8626 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:10.53 -10:25:13.1: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1625 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.47 -08:07:31.0: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.47 -08:07:31.0: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8326 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:25.52 -08:29:52.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:09.73 -08:53:55.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:25.52 -08:29:52.6: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2053 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:09.73 -08:53:55.7: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1929 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:28.49 -08:12:14.4: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:54.63 -08:33:27.4: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:44.10 -06:39:37.0: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:54.63 -08:33:27.4: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:44.10 -06:39:37.0: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:54.63 -08:33:27.4: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2600 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:44.10 -06:39:37.0: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2362 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:28.49 -08:12:14.4: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:28.49 -08:12:14.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2271 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20512.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20547.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20512_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 20512_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20514_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20514_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20520_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20520_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20540_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20540_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20547_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 20547_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20548_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20548_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20551_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20551_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20552_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20552_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20556_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20556_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20557_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20557_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20561_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20561_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20562_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20562_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20563_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20563_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81579_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81579_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81584_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81584_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81590_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81590_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81603_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81603_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81604_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81604_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81612_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81612_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81615_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81615_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81616_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81616_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81618_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81618_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81624_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81624_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81627_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81627_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81719_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81719_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:26.60 -08:52:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81751_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81751_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:04.68 -12:57:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81848_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81848_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.20 -05:49:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81865_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 81865_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:34.16 -12:26:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82013_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 82013_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82101_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82101_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82129_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82129_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:52.09 -10:03:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82153_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82153_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:41.58 -08:21:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82168_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 82168_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82185_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82185_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82196_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82196_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:44.75 -08:22:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82212_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82212_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82221_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82221_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82259_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 82259_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82274_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82274_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82331_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82331_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:26.43 -06:56:24.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.716 4351868740725763072 246.61018517553 -06.94030095315 12.9545 11.4508 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.716#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82335_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82335_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82337_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 82337_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82347_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82347_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82408_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82408_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82438_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82438_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82453_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82453_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82455_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82455_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82503_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82503_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82575_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82575_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82580_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82580_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82601_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82601_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82652_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82652_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82664_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82664_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82699_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82699_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82725_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82725_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82729_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82729_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82766_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82766_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82792_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82792_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82794_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82794_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82799_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82799_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82803_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82803_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82807_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82807_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82811_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82811_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82823_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82823_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82840_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82840_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82872_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82872_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82905_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82905_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82918_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82918_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82919_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82919_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82924_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82924_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82925_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82925_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82936_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82936_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82938_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82938_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82942_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82942_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82943_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82943_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82963_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82963_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82970_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82970_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82978_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82978_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82982_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82982_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82984_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82984_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82987_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82987_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82991_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82991_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82994_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 82994_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83018_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 83018_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83031_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 83031_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83053_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 83053_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:13.65 -13:57:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.42 -07:42:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_00-29-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
