This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1855 2461228.6855 11.13 19:11:34.58 -27:20:47.6
10.05776 -16.19101 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 0 0 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:11:34.58 -27:20:47.6: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:34.58 -27:20:47.6: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6855,11.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1855 11.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1855 2461228.6855 11.30 19:19:37.36 -29:05:47.2
9.05310 -18.48963 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -0 0 0 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:37.36 -29:05:47.2: 14.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:37.36 -29:05:47.2: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6855,11.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1855 11.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1855 2461228.6855 11.39 18:51:27.59 -27:32:46.9
8.03258 -12.17818 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -1 -1 1 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:51:27.59 -27:32:46.9: 14.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:27.59 -27:32:46.9: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6855,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1855 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1855 2461228.6855 12.27 19:04:05.06 -24:45:10.4
11.83615 -13.62098 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne -1 1 1 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:04:05.06 -24:45:10.4: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:05.06 -24:45:10.4: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6855,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1855 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1855 2461228.6855 12.48 18:48:51.91 -28:23:21.4
7.00527 -12.00592 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa -1 0 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:51.91 -28:23:21.4: 14.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:51.91 -28:23:21.4: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6855,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1855 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1855 2461228.6855 13.12 19:18:40.36 -24:58:39.6
12.97658 -16.74961 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2013 Tucapel -1 1 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:18:40.36 -24:58:39.6: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:40.36 -24:58:39.6: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6855,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1855 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1855 2461228.6855 13.43 19:15:18.72 -26:48:43.2
10.90473 -16.75451 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.503 Evelyn -1 -0 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:15:18.72 -26:48:43.2: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:18.72 -26:48:43.2: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6855,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1855 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461228.68583807 07.07.2026 04:27:26.409 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 65 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7182
Objects passed selection criteria: 7171
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7013.75
Average stars matched: 6045.5 (86.195 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 6 23:38:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461228.68583807 07.07.2026 04:27:26.409 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 68 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 81948
Objects passed selection criteria: 81848
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 83235
Average stars matched: 69921 (84.0043 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1926788 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 6 23:43:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.68522365
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:14.989 -25:57:42.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:14.989 -25:57:42.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0659 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:11.604 -25:58:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:11.604 -25:58:11.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:14.989 -25:57:42.26
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:11.604 -25:58:11.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01508 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5EvQzgx0wc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EWhm2l4tdo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z0fms8DUDq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Hrx4XacaG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.396850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.396850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5EvQzgx0wc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, bad_region=1388, passed=8597
Got 8597 stars (including 6796 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=303 n_q2=135 n_q3=301 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EWhm2l4tdo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=2274, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 10138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=321 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z0fms8DUDq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=455, bad_region=1168, passed=6165
Got 6165 stars (including 4635 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6165 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.872 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=318 n_q2=145 n_q3=272 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0Hrx4XacaG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, bad_region=1189, passed=6250
Got 6250 stars (including 4698 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6250 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.880 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=313 n_q2=144 n_q3=280 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.495
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits sigma_overall=0.565 worst_q_ratio=1.323
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.371
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits sigma_overall=0.626 worst_q_ratio=1.393
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits sigma_overall=0.588 worst_q_ratio=1.495
reference average sigma_overall=0.5355 worst_q_ratio=1.347
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23829_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 23829_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.82 -29:04:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23833_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 23833_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.49 -22:34:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23834_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 23834_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.77 -23:56:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23838_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 23838_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.75 -26:20:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.17 -28:51:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:14.989 -25:57:42.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:14.989 -25:57:42.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0659 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:11.604 -25:58:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:11.604 -25:58:11.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:14.989 -25:57:42.26
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:11.604 -25:58:11.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01508 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ijPMLbkCt5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u6eOUYyuR4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PxC65waRgt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y36sfuRzDg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ijPMLbkCt5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=5805, bad_region=9579, passed=85935
Got 85935 stars (including 70842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=331 n_q2=144 n_q3=263 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u6eOUYyuR4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=17584, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 115576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=325 n_q2=171 n_q3=233 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.513
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PxC65waRgt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4570, bad_region=10505, passed=76635
Got 76635 stars (including 61888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76635 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.893 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=330 n_q2=165 n_q3=228 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.524
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y36sfuRzDg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4601, bad_region=10386, passed=75954
Got 75954 stars (including 61284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75954 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.912 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=326 n_q2=168 n_q3=232 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.746
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-26-33_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_232815_TTUQ2b1x1_2589338_AlHap6Hw/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:51:41.22 -23:17:12.0: 12.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:57:24.50 -26:42:08.3: 13.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:57.56 -28:13:23.6: 12.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:42:58.30 -22:15:15.3: 13.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:34.04 -23:13:27.9: 12.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:41.77 -28:36:25.5: 13.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:31.05 -24:22:41.1: 12.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:40.81 -27:17:59.5: 13.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:47.61 -25:06:44.0: 12.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:58.30 -22:15:15.3: 13.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:24.50 -26:42:08.3: 13.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:41.22 -23:17:12.0: 13.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:41.77 -28:36:25.5: 13.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:34.04 -23:13:27.9: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:57.56 -28:13:23.6: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:58.30 -22:15:15.3: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9506 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:24.50 -26:42:08.3: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2832 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:41.22 -23:17:12.0: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1371 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:41.77 -28:36:25.5: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3405 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:34.04 -23:13:27.9: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0923 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:57.56 -28:13:23.6: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0978 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:31.05 -24:22:41.1: 13.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:31.05 -24:22:41.1: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0806 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:40.81 -27:17:59.5: 13.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:47.61 -25:06:44.0: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:40.81 -27:17:59.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0714 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:47.61 -25:06:44.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0365 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:15:19.80 -22:57:22.3: 13.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:12:59.25 -21:57:34.7: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:04.52 -28:18:22.4: 12.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:47:03.97 -22:10:58.1: 12.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:45.47 -26:22:46.2: 12.87 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:35.34 -22:02:09.2: 12.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:19.80 -22:57:22.3: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:24.96 -26:57:55.3: 12.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:19.80 -22:57:22.3: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0327 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:26:51.32 -24:39:00.9: 12.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:46:04.66 -21:49:28.2: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:59.25 -21:57:34.7: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:04.52 -28:18:22.4: 12.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:03.97 -22:10:58.1: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:59.25 -21:57:34.7: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9368 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:46:17.26 -22:01:01.7: 12.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:04.52 -28:18:22.4: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9434 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:35.34 -22:02:09.2: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:45.47 -26:22:46.2: 12.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:03.97 -22:10:58.1: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6000 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:35.34 -22:02:09.2: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6228 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:45.47 -26:22:46.2: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7135 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:24.96 -26:57:55.3: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:24.96 -26:57:55.3: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7759 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:51.32 -24:39:00.9: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:04.66 -21:49:28.2: 12.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:51.32 -24:39:00.9: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7352 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:04.66 -21:49:28.2: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4054 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:17.26 -22:01:01.7: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:17.26 -22:01:01.7: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3766 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:24.13 -29:00:26.0: 12.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:18.32 -29:07:07.3: 12.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:11.30 -29:40:38.3: 12.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:12.59 -27:14:52.0: 12.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:24.13 -29:00:26.0: 12.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:24.13 -29:00:26.0: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6248 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:13:15.36 -22:15:55.2: 12.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:18.32 -29:07:07.3: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:26:02.42 -27:13:10.6: 12.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:18.32 -29:07:07.3: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8924 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:12.59 -27:14:52.0: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:11.30 -29:40:38.3: 12.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:26:35.98 -26:12:50.2: 10.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:12.59 -27:14:52.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7411 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:11.30 -29:40:38.3: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8183 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:11:34.58 -27:20:47.6: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:37.36 -29:05:47.2: 14.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:15.36 -22:15:55.2: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:15.36 -22:15:55.2: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4456 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:35.98 -26:12:50.2: 10.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:02.42 -27:13:10.6: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:51:27.59 -27:32:46.9: 14.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.60 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:35.98 -26:12:50.2: ref_mag=10.60 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9765 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:02.42 -27:13:10.6: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6191 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:37.36 -29:05:47.2: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:34.58 -27:20:47.6: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:27.59 -27:32:46.9: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:04:05.06 -24:45:10.4: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:51.91 -28:23:21.4: 14.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:05.06 -24:45:10.4: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:13.01 -22:04:48.7: 12.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:47:40.48 -29:09:12.6: 12.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:51.91 -28:23:21.4: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:40.48 -29:09:12.6: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:13.01 -22:04:48.7: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:40.48 -29:09:12.6: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5146 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:13.01 -22:04:48.7: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6055 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:03:43.75 -27:30:58.4: 12.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:18:59.51 -23:54:30.6: 14.65 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:59.51 -23:54:30.6: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:43.75 -27:30:58.4: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:18:59.51 -23:54:30.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.0423 delta=1.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:43.75 -27:30:58.4: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7866 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:15:18.72 -26:48:43.2: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:42:30.38 -25:48:41.2: 14.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:18:40.36 -24:58:39.6: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:30.38 -25:48:41.2: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:40.36 -24:58:39.6: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:18.72 -26:48:43.2: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:31:12.33 -21:38:01.6: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:31:12.33 -21:38:01.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:12.33 -21:38:01.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5733 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:22.37 -29:28:53.8: 13.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:22.37 -29:28:53.8: 13.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:22.37 -29:28:53.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4518 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:03.15 -25:09:04.7: 13.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:54:49.38 -23:34:37.7: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:03.15 -25:09:04.7: 13.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:03.15 -25:09:04.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5573 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:49.38 -23:34:37.7: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:55.43 -25:35:26.0: 14.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:55.43 -25:35:26.0: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:50:55.43 -25:35:26.0: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.2664 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100494.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148585.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148634.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148780.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148348.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148367.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148457.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148478.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148629.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148128_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148128_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148140_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148140_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148146_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148146_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148149_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148149_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148150_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148150_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148156_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148156_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148157_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148157_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:24.37 -27:58:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148162_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148162_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:36.32 -27:58:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148166_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148166_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:17.59 -22:03:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148173_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148173_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148182_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148182_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148184_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148184_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:31.57 -26:20:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148193_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148193_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148203_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148203_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148212_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148212_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148216_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148216_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148221_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148221_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148226_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148226_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148229_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148229_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148230_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148230_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148233_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148233_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148237_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148237_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:10.14 -21:55:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148238_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148238_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148241_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148241_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148243_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148243_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148244_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148244_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148246_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148246_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148247_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148247_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148248_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148248_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:47.56 -25:44:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148256_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148256_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:15.97 -22:58:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148257_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148257_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148258_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148258_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148262_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148262_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:21.87 -26:32:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148266_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148266_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.74 -28:43:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148270_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148270_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148276_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148276_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:16.77 -23:01:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148289_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148289_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148344_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 148344_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148348_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 148348_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148367_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 148367_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148402_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148402_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.93 -28:00:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148433_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148433_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:06.96 -25:53:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148447_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148447_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.11 -26:25:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148457_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 148457_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148463_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148463_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:48.96 -27:20:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148478_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 148478_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148483_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148483_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148491_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148491_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.49 -23:55:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148500_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148500_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148509_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148509_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:50.47 -27:52:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148512_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148512_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.29 -28:17:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148524_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148524_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148585_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148585_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.51 -23:54:30.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.083 6770705231333811328 289.74766208185 -23.90863083444 13.3144 11.0768 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.083#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148588_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148588_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.42 -25:29:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148592_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 148592_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148629_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 148629_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148634_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148634_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:30.38 -25:48:41.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.336 4073332552437515520 280.62672248837 -25.81109506732 13.6115 11.5802 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.336#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148686_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148686_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148731_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148731_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148748_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148748_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.73 -23:20:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148765_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148765_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148780_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 148780_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:49.38 -23:34:37.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.404 4075511887561846784 283.70660420509 -23.57766895403 13.0627 11.3200 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.404#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100494_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 100494_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.43 -25:35:26.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.207 4074646674992538496 282.73051357145 -25.59135082777 12.2797 10.3616 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.207#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101374_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 101374_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.54 -23:19:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:20.99 -22:59:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.49 -22:34:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.52 -27:50:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:12.61 -28:03:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:21.29 -28:07:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 126475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.62 -26:46:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.37 -23:36:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:38.55 -21:51:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.77 -23:56:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.22 -28:51:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.75 -26:20:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.56 -29:49:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:19.59 -24:58:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:37.37 -25:01:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_23-27-26_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
