This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.93 19:02:06.86 +26:06:25.7
57.53350 9.40662 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:02:06.86 +26:06:25.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:02:06.86 +26:06:25.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:02:06.86 +26:06:25.7: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461226.7154,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260705.2154 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.69 19:52:14.14 +19:08:37.0
56.87443 -4.06563 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:52:14.14 +19:08:37.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:52:14.14 +19:08:37.0: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:52:14.14 +19:08:37.0: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461226.7154,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260705.2154 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 12.21 19:09:13.94 +25:42:18.0
57.87919 7.79199 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:09:13.94 +25:42:18.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:09:13.94 +25:42:18.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:09:13.94 +25:42:18.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461226.7154,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260705.2154 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 12.00 19:07:15.57 +26:01:21.1
57.96805 8.33055 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 2036050657081090176 | 19:07:15.57 +26:01:21.1 (user input) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | (position from user input) (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:07:15.57 +26:01:21.1: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:07:15.57 +26:01:21.1: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 2036050657081090176,2461226.7154,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 2036050657081090176 20260705.2154 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 12.01 19:11:06.46 +25:35:07.9
57.96168 7.36046 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 2.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J191106.52+253507.8
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 V 13.520 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:11:06.46 +25:35:07.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:11:06.46 +25:35:07.9: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J191106.52+253507.8,2461226.7154,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J191106.52+253507.8 20260705.2154 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.61 19:49:37.16 +17:28:54.1
55.12205 -4.37107 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:49:37.16 +17:28:54.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:49:37.16 +17:28:54.1: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:49:37.16 +17:28:54.1: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461226.7154,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260705.2154 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.54 19:54:00.03 +17:02:23.8
55.27094 -5.49675 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 1820396363457233152
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.180 G 12.210 G A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:00.03 +17:02:23.8: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:00.03 +17:02:23.8: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1820396363457233152,2461226.7154,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1820396363457233152 20260705.2154 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 12.14 19:08:49.37 +25:56:43.9
58.05538 7.98143 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:08:49.37 +25:56:43.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:08:49.37 +25:56:43.9: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:08:49.37 +25:56:43.9: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461226.7154,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260705.2154 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.57 19:50:01.04 +17:47:44.3
55.44191 -4.29476 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:50:01.04 +17:47:44.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:50:01.04 +17:47:44.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:50:01.04 +17:47:44.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461226.7154,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260705.2154 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.57 19:51:06.24 +17:47:04.8
55.56344 -4.52356 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1821246870047728256 | 19:51:06.24 +17:47:04.8 (user input) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | (position from user input) (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:51:06.24 +17:47:04.8: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:51:06.24 +17:47:04.8: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1821246870047728256,2461226.7154,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1821246870047728256 20260705.2154 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.48 19:54:31.97 +17:45:41.5
55.95960 -5.23846 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:54:31.97 +17:45:41.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:31.97 +17:45:41.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:31.97 +17:45:41.5: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461226.7154,11.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260705.2154 11.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.44 19:48:19.36 +17:42:04.2
55.15648 -3.99361 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J297.0760+17.7066 | 19:48:19.51 +17:42:05.0 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.900+/-0.039 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:48:19.36 +17:42:04.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:48:19.36 +17:42:04.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J297.0760+17.7066,2461226.7154,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J297.0760+17.7066 20260705.2154 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.36 19:54:28.63 +17:31:48.4
55.75289 -5.34508 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1821188630306282496 | 19:54:28.76 +17:31:44.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:28.63 +17:31:48.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:28.63 +17:31:48.4: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1821188630306282496,2461226.7154,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1821188630306282496 20260705.2154 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.54 19:54:28.95 +17:40:02.0
55.87200 -5.27625 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.0 pix
The object was found in VSX22" Gaia DR3 1821194986858004352
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.830 G 13.860 G A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:28.95 +17:40:02.0: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:28.95 +17:40:02.0: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1821194986858004352,2461226.7154,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1821194986858004352 20260705.2154 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.38 19:54:08.96 +17:00:30.7
55.26195 -5.54337 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.5285+17.0028 | 19:54:09.12 +17:00:29.6 (Gaia DR3) | NSINE (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.922+/-0.035 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:08.96 +17:00:30.7: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:08.96 +17:00:30.7: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.5285+17.0028,2461226.7154,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.5285+17.0028 20260705.2154 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.26 19:51:53.77 +19:17:14.5
56.95767 -3.92354 galactic Sge Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 2.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J195153.94+191713.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.880 V 13.220 V 2458273.58550 57.770665600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:51:53.77 +19:17:14.5: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:51:53.77 +19:17:14.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195153.94+191713.0,2461226.7154,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195153.94+191713.0 20260705.2154 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 05.2154 2461226.7154 11.84 19:08:07.38 +26:33:07.7
58.53473 8.39068 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 2.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J190807.38+263307.9
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V 13.210 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:08:07.38 +26:33:07.7: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:08:07.38 +26:33:07.7: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J190807.38+263307.9,2461226.7154,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J190807.38+263307.9 20260705.2154 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.93408543 17.05.2026 10:24:54.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
First image: 2461177.93408543 17.05.2026 10:24:54.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
Last image: 2461226.71565876 05.07.2026 05:10:22.917 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25670
Objects passed selection criteria: 25482
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15015.5
Average stars matched: 14533 (96.7867 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 129668 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 3 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-123-g57107621
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 5 00:15:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.93408543 17.05.2026 10:24:54.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
First image: 2461177.93408543 17.05.2026 10:24:54.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
Last image: 2461226.71565876 05.07.2026 05:10:22.917 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 177
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 44 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 207478
Objects passed selection criteria: 206759
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 129136
Average stars matched: 122632 (94.9634 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1966284 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 3 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-123-g57107621
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 5 00:25:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461226.71517479
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits'
wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits'
wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:23:04.854 +22:00:37.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:23:14.657 +21:58:23.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:23:04.854 +22:00:37.73
Second-epoch image center 19:23:14.657 +21:58:23.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0531 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:23:13.597 +21:58:16.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:23:04.854 +22:00:37.73
Second-epoch image center 19:23:13.597 +21:58:16.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0518 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:23:14.657 +21:58:23.50
Second-epoch second image center 19:23:13.597 +21:58:16.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00454 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qUsXDlU6K0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tXCshRXenx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ghYzwu3m5V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0iOnRHlw6Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits and wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits and wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits and wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 282.0096 to 299.5216 deg, Dec +16.5872 to +27.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 282.0096 to 299.5216 deg, Dec 16.5872 to 27.2740 deg
Loaded 18852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12639 out of 13800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13800 out of 27697 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 282.0096 to 299.5216 deg, Dec +16.5872 to +27.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 282.0096 to 299.5216 deg, Dec 16.5872 to 27.2740 deg
Loaded 18852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12639 out of 13800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13800 out of 27697 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 27510 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 282.0087 to 299.5187 deg, Dec +16.5999 to +27.2874 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 282.0087 to 299.5187 deg, Dec 16.5999 to 27.2874 deg
Loaded 18870 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13183 out of 14382 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14382 out of 27510 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
2.4 pix Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
2.8 pix fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
2.6 pix fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
15.0 mag. Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
12.0 mag. fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
11.9 mag. fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.9 (SNR ) 9.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qUsXDlU6K0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits' -> 'wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2722, bad_region=0, passed=27697
Got 27697 stars (including 24942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.790 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.678 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.957 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.788 n_q1=185 n_q2=307 n_q3=189 n_q4=280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits -region wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tXCshRXenx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits' -> 'wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2737, bad_region=0, passed=27506
Got 27506 stars (including 24749 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27001 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27000 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.745 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.697 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.895 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.717 n_q1=187 n_q2=307 n_q3=193 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits -region wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ghYzwu3m5V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=113, bad_region=0, passed=2953
Got 2953 stars (including 2832 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=144 n_q2=293 n_q3=336 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0iOnRHlw6Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=88, bad_region=0, passed=2429
Got 2429 stars (including 2336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2429 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=137 n_q2=259 n_q3=325 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.516
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits sigma_overall=0.790 worst_q_ratio=1.212
ref2=Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits sigma_overall=0.745 worst_q_ratio=1.201
new1=fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits sigma_overall=0.458 worst_q_ratio=1.252
new2=fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.516
reference average sigma_overall=0.7675 worst_q_ratio=1.2065
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.68 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.67 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vul-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vul-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:23:04.854 +22:00:37.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:23:14.657 +21:58:23.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:23:04.854 +22:00:37.73
Second-epoch image center 19:23:14.657 +21:58:23.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0531 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:23:13.597 +21:58:16.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:23:04.854 +22:00:37.73
Second-epoch image center 19:23:13.597 +21:58:16.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0518 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:23:14.657 +21:58:23.50
Second-epoch second image center 19:23:13.597 +21:58:16.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00454 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JKoAOD1e7M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nTxFwrlykd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gRIZKq1ZUQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZFvCkrkV2X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits and wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits and wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits and wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 231758 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 281.9830 to 299.5234 deg, Dec +16.5833 to +27.2757 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 281.9830 to 299.5234 deg, Dec 16.5833 to 27.2757 deg
Loaded 18886 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9948 out of 14403 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14403 out of 231758 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.599650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.599650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 231758 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 281.9830 to 299.5234 deg, Dec +16.5833 to +27.2757 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 281.9830 to 299.5234 deg, Dec 16.5833 to 27.2757 deg
Loaded 18886 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9948 out of 14403 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14403 out of 231758 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 231606 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 281.9803 to 299.5194 deg, Dec +16.5979 to +27.2882 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 281.9803 to 299.5194 deg, Dec 16.5979 to 27.2882 deg
Loaded 18902 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10347 out of 15024 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15024 out of 231606 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 136 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
2.2 pix Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
2.5 pix fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
2.5 pix fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
15.2 mag. Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
12.5 mag. fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.5 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JKoAOD1e7M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits' -> 'wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=36344, bad_region=0, passed=231691
Got 231691 stars (including 195014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 231691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 227270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 227270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 227268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.732 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.664 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.840 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.673 n_q1=203 n_q2=295 n_q3=182 n_q4=280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits -region wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nTxFwrlykd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits' -> 'wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=10, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=36086, bad_region=1, passed=231543
Got 231543 stars (including 195156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 231543 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 225713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 225714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 225714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.712 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.671 n_q1=204 n_q2=289 n_q3=186 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits -region wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gRIZKq1ZUQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=738, bad_region=8, passed=30370
Got 30370 stars (including 29548 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30370 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=148 n_q2=284 n_q3=337 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZFvCkrkV2X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=560, bad_region=5, passed=26048
Got 26048 stars (including 25416 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26048 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.720 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=138 n_q2=256 n_q3=325 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.501
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-09-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-05_CI_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_001145_TTUQ1b1x1_3401768_RV8K9HbG/wcs_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vul-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 18:54:48.32 +24:06:31.7: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 18:50:45.77 +22:11:14.5: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:02:08.73 +23:30:01.8: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:43:25.32 +16:56:40.7: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:02:08.73 +23:30:01.8: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 18:54:48.32 +24:06:31.7: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 18:50:45.77 +22:11:14.5: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:08.73 +23:30:01.8: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7239 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:48.32 +24:06:31.7: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9796 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:45.77 +22:11:14.5: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3239 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:43:25.32 +16:56:40.7: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:25.32 +16:56:40.7: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0781 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:00:28.04 +20:11:20.7: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:53:45.82 +18:46:43.6: 11.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:00:28.04 +20:11:20.7: 10.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:28.04 +20:11:20.7: ref_mag=10.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7573 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:28:53.27 +24:38:46.8: 10.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:53:45.82 +18:46:43.6: 11.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:45.82 +18:46:43.6: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9043 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:41:32.18 +16:43:28.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:28:53.27 +24:38:46.8: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:53.27 +24:38:46.8: ref_mag=10.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4932 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:41:32.18 +16:43:28.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:32.18 +16:43:28.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:46:55.72 +16:42:32.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:52:32.70 +19:08:28.6: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:32:08.65 +25:35:03.9: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:46:55.72 +16:42:32.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:55.72 +16:42:32.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:52:32.70 +19:08:28.6: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:32.70 +19:08:28.6: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6655 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:37:18.69 +26:20:45.7: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:32:08.65 +25:35:03.9: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:08.65 +25:35:03.9: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9058 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:22:35.51 +24:56:55.8: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:37:18.69 +26:20:45.7: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:18.69 +26:20:45.7: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0790 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:22:35.51 +24:56:55.8: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:35.51 +24:56:55.8: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4369 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:02:06.86 +26:06:25.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:02:06.86 +26:06:25.7: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:02:06.86 +26:06:25.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9158 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:52:14.14 +19:08:37.0: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:09:13.94 +25:42:18.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:52:14.14 +19:08:37.0: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:52:14.14 +19:08:37.0: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6950 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:09:13.94 +25:42:18.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:09:13.94 +25:42:18.0: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2079 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:07:15.57 +26:01:21.1: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:07:15.57 +26:01:21.1: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:07:15.57 +26:01:21.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9979 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:11:06.46 +25:35:07.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:11:06.46 +25:35:07.9: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:11:06.46 +25:35:07.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0044 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:53:32.39 +18:12:34.2: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:50:44.26 +17:40:48.1: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:53:32.39 +18:12:34.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:32.39 +18:12:34.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6262 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:50:44.26 +17:40:48.1: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:44.26 +17:40:48.1: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5404 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:49:37.16 +17:28:54.1: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:49:37.16 +17:28:54.1: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:49:37.16 +17:28:54.1: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5786 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:00.03 +17:02:23.8: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:04:48.77 +25:48:02.4: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:08:49.37 +25:56:43.9: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:00.03 +17:02:23.8: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:00.03 +17:02:23.8: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5368 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:04:48.77 +25:48:02.4: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:48.77 +25:48:02.4: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0331 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:08:49.37 +25:56:43.9: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:08:49.37 +25:56:43.9: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1298 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:02.28 +17:28:29.7: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:02.28 +17:28:29.7: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:02.28 +17:28:29.7: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9959 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:50:01.04 +17:47:44.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:50:01.04 +17:47:44.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:50:01.04 +17:47:44.3: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5668 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:51:06.24 +17:47:04.8: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:51:06.24 +17:47:04.8: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:51:06.24 +17:47:04.8: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5672 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:17.52 +19:15:13.7: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:17.52 +19:15:13.7: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:17.52 +19:15:13.7: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4699 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:31.97 +17:45:41.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:31.97 +17:45:41.5: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:31.97 +17:45:41.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5009 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:48:19.36 +17:42:04.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:48:19.36 +17:42:04.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:48:19.36 +17:42:04.2: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4498 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:28.63 +17:31:48.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:28.63 +17:31:48.4: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:28.63 +17:31:48.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3794 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:50:21.82 +18:28:43.9: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:50:21.82 +18:28:43.9: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:21.82 +18:28:43.9: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3952 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:28.95 +17:40:02.0: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:28.95 +17:40:02.0: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:28.95 +17:40:02.0: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5532 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:54:08.96 +17:00:30.7: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:54:08.96 +17:00:30.7: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:08.96 +17:00:30.7: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3986 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:51:53.77 +19:17:14.5: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:51:53.77 +19:17:14.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:51:53.77 +19:17:14.5: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2661 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-24-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1311.fits at 19:08:07.38 +26:33:07.7: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-25-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1312.fits at 19:08:07.38 +26:33:07.7: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:08:07.38 +26:33:07.7: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7822 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07555.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08496.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16356.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18277.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out187159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190734.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20693.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21078.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out217802.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out226228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22756.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22823.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22858.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231361.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55470.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 424s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265990_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 265990_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265994_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 265994_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:05.49 +19:30:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265995_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 265995_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265997_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 265997_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:43.29 +18:37:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265999_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 265999_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:17.89 +16:56:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266001_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266001_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:46.00 +18:47:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266002_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266002_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:17.51 +17:35:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266003_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266003_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:26.93 +17:54:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266004_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266004_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266005_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266005_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266006_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266006_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:52.95 +20:31:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266008_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266008_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:42.17 +17:24:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266010_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266010_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:43.79 +18:45:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266011_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266011_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266012_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266012_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266159_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266159_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266185_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266185_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266209_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266209_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266219_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266219_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266241_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266241_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266245_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266245_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266252_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266252_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266378_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266378_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266384_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266384_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266386_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266386_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266404_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266404_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266416_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266416_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266478_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266478_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266647_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266647_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:49.26 +18:44:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266658_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266658_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:32.96 +18:11:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266670_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266670_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266719_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266719_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266722_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266722_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266747_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266747_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266834_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266834_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:36.46 +17:15:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266943_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266943_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:09.34 +19:18:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266956_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266956_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266977_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 266977_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267020_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267020_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267090_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267090_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:17.85 +25:19:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267097_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267097_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267112_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267112_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267173_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267173_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:45.08 +23:18:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267257_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267257_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267300_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267300_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267305_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267305_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267354_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267354_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267443_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267443_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267447_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267447_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267538_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267538_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267580_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267580_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267596_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 267596_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30122_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 30122_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:05.73 +18:00:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174389_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 174389_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:42.02 +24:39:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100950_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 100950_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:13.21 +21:23:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26684_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 26684_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:24.49 +17:58:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226228_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 226228_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03874_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 03874_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:22.70 +16:50:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21882_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 21882_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:11.10 +17:43:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13492_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 13492_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:35.59 +17:19:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09527_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 09527_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:13.25 +17:06:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19760_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 19760_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:05.65 +17:38:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168774_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 168774_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:45.79 +24:42:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17080_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 17080_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:47.53 +17:29:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17950_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 17950_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:11.77 +17:31:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16255_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 16255_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:23.99 +17:27:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52037_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 52037_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187159_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 187159_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171134_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 171134_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16093_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 16093_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:56.41 +17:27:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167286_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 167286_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:03.84 +24:33:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198053_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 198053_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:55.70 +25:10:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230326_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 230326_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178355_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 178355_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:26.63 +24:47:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17996_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 17996_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:08.85 +17:31:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36422_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 36422_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:02.20 +18:25:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190734_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 190734_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13871_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 13871_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:17.93 +17:20:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14133_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 14133_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:29.92 +17:20:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142878_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 142878_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:36.94 +23:26:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195502_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 195502_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:55.39 +25:17:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22585_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 22585_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:48.52 +17:44:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12746_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 12746_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:31.74 +17:16:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22925_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 22925_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:00.88 +17:47:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168760_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 168760_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:15.94 +24:34:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12921_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 12921_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:53.35 +17:16:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32126_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 32126_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16286_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 16286_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:36.63 +17:26:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23451_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 23451_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:21.34 +17:48:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244023_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 244023_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243961_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 243961_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:56.72 +22:04:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16356_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 16356_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23987_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 23987_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:10.89 +17:49:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18726_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 18726_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:49.21 +17:35:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08496_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 08496_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231361_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 231361_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184492_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 184492_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17750_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 17750_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22823_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 22823_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25095_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 25095_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:49.57 +17:54:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22756_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 22756_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12471_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 12471_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:02.68 +17:14:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54761_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 54761_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20763_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20763_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:58.55 +17:41:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15177_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 15177_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:40.77 +17:23:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199317_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 199317_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:58.78 +25:07:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21603_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 21603_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:08.24 +17:43:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22929_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 22929_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:15.15 +17:46:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17503_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 17503_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:25.25 +17:31:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16129_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 16129_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:20.48 +17:26:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20199_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20199_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:57.63 +17:38:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22858_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 22858_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100897_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 100897_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:44.90 +21:24:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20603_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:34.25 +17:40:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21845_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 21845_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:51.64 +17:42:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20693_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 20693_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18277_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 18277_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122847_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 122847_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:03.65 +22:31:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37468_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 37468_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03912_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 03912_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:33.07 +16:49:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10274_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 10274_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:55.52 +17:07:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12536_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 12536_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:44.41 +17:15:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217994_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 217994_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:29.89 +26:25:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09367_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 09367_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:39.49 +17:06:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21078_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 21078_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07555_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 07555_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55470_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 55470_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156424_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 156424_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:59.60 +24:01:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176810_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 176810_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:45.56 +25:01:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19249_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 19249_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:46.13 +17:36:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217802_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 217802_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19509_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 19509_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:16.80 +17:35:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10024_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 10024_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:16.29 +17:08:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184206_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 184206_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:00.65 +25:49:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230760_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 230760_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:11.75 +26:00:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128454_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 128454_fd_Vul-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-05_00-10-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
