This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 10.59 04:11:48.08 +29:23:25.1
166.94944 -15.88612 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J041148.12+292325.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.822 g Y 0.679 g 2458411.83230 176.975453100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:48.08 +29:23:25.1: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:48.08 +29:23:25.1: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 04 11 48.08 +29 23 25.1 10.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041148.12+292325.4,2461225.9302,10.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041148.12+292325.4 20260704.4302 10.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 10.15 04:22:10.28 +31:21:53.4
167.09323 -12.90611 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J042210.32+312153.8
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.540 V 12.190 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:22:10.28 +31:21:53.4: 11.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:22:10.28 +31:21:53.4: 11.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 04 22 10.28 +31 21 53.4 10.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042210.32+312153.8,2461225.9302,10.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042210.32+312153.8 20260704.4302 10.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 10.71 03:53:04.32 +25:32:41.2
166.62129 -21.53746 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" SX Tau
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.600 V 16.600 V 2454736.00000 225.000000000000 M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:53:04.32 +25:32:41.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:53:04.32 +25:32:41.2: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 03 53 04.32 +25 32 41.2 10.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SX Tau,2461225.9302,10.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SX Tau 20260704.4302 10.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 11.51 03:56:48.33 +27:33:43.2
165.80388 -19.49292 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" UV Tau
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 pg < 15.600 pg 2433620.00000 333.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:56:48.33 +27:33:43.2: 16.05 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:56:48.33 +27:33:43.2: 16.07 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.06 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 03 56 48.33 +27 33 43.2 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
UV Tau,2461225.9302,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
UV Tau 20260704.4302 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 11.89 04:13:28.75 +29:35:01.4
167.07314 -15.49046 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 1 -1 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:13:28.75 +29:35:01.4: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:13:28.75 +29:35:01.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 04 13 28.75 +29 35 01.4 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.9302,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.4302 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 11.05 04:10:37.97 +34:15:54.7
163.23122 -12.59341 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" RV Per
Type: EA/SD
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.300 V 12.700 V 2442046.92100 1.973492600000 A2
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:10:37.97 +34:15:54.7: 12.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:10:37.97 +34:15:54.7: 12.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 04 10 37.97 +34 15 54.7 11.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RV Per,2461225.9302,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RV Per 20260704.4302 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 11.81 03:47:33.78 +29:58:50.9
162.49512 -19.04969 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V1190 Tau
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.400 V 13.800 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:47:33.78 +29:58:50.9: 12.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:47:33.78 +29:58:50.9: 12.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 03 47 33.78 +29 58 50.9 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1190 Tau,2461225.9302,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1190 Tau 20260704.4302 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 10.93 03:50:28.17 +27:40:06.0
164.62698 -20.36304 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1192 Tau
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.500 V 12.500 V 2452998.50000 140.633466000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:50:28.17 +27:40:06.0: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:50:28.17 +27:40:06.0: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 03 50 28.17 +27 40 06.0 10.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1192 Tau,2461225.9302,10.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1192 Tau 20260704.4302 10.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 12.24 04:09:53.65 +32:11:54.0
164.60012 -14.18164 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0409534+321153
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.805 g Y 1.010 g 2458466.84100 165.632048800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:09:53.65 +32:11:54.0: 13.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:09:53.65 +32:11:54.0: 13.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 04 09 53.65 +32 11 54.0 12.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0409534+321153,2461225.9302,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0409534+321153 20260704.4302 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 12.50 04:21:00.11 +30:22:17.0
167.65713 -13.77148 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J042059.97+302217.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.630 g Y 0.420 g 2458523.55900 560.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:00.11 +30:22:17.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:00.11 +30:22:17.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 04 21 00.11 +30 22 17.0 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042059.97+302217.9,2461225.9302,12.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042059.97+302217.9 20260704.4302 12.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 11.38 03:51:52.53 +30:25:24.4
162.92687 -18.10278 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1246 Tau
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.500 w 10.800 w 95.000000000000 S
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:51:52.53 +30:25:24.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:51:52.53 +30:25:24.4: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 03 51 52.53 +30 25 24.4 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1246 Tau,2461225.9302,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1246 Tau 20260704.4302 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 11.68 04:37:15.18 +33:48:47.9
167.43325 -8.90973 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0960 Per
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.660 R 12.780 R 2451512.68000 4.526500000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:37:15.18 +33:48:47.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:37:15.18 +33:48:47.9: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 04 37 15.18 +33 48 47.9 11.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0960 Per,2461225.9302,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0960 Per 20260704.4302 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 11.52 04:25:17.19 +28:04:40.9
170.04654 -14.64788 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 4.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0425174+280437
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.443 R1 Y 0.542 R1 305.000000000000 M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:25:17.19 +28:04:40.9: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:25:17.19 +28:04:40.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 04 25 17.19 +28 04 40.9 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0425174+280437,2461225.9302,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0425174+280437 20260704.4302 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4302 2461225.9302 11.38 04:27:22.78 +33:35:45.7
166.19920 -10.57839 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J042722.86+333546.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.540 V 13.580 V 2457661.00000 558.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:22.78 +33:35:45.7: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:22.78 +33:35:45.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4302* 04 27 22.78 +33 35 45.7 11.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042722.86+333546.8,2461225.9302,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042722.86+333546.8 20260704.4302 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461225.93041098 04.07.2026 10:19:37.509 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 32
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12638
Objects passed selection criteria: 12562
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8059.75
Average stars matched: 7815.75 (96.9726 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117992 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 3 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-123-g57107621
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 4 05:24:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461225.93041098 04.07.2026 10:19:37.509 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 52 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90145
Objects passed selection criteria: 89865
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 57678.5
Average stars matched: 55397 (96.0445 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1858892 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 3 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-123-g57107621
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 4 05:27:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461225.92992010
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:57.524 +29:57:51.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 03:59:57.524 +29:57:51.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0353 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:57.411 +29:58:17.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 03:59:57.411 +29:58:17.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0285 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:57.524 +29:57:51.97
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:57.411 +29:58:17.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00715 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5C19chN6dg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RV3IvNjRGE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f8cRYXaXW9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AI4sqr8cTw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3110 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3110 deg
Loaded 7268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5559 out of 6072 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6072 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 29 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5C19chN6dg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=288 n_q2=226 n_q3=157 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RV3IvNjRGE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=285 n_q2=225 n_q3=160 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f8cRYXaXW9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=160, bad_region=0, passed=2792
Got 2792 stars (including 2629 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=311 n_q2=157 n_q3=243 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AI4sqr8cTw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=143, bad_region=0, passed=2725
Got 2725 stars (including 2580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=308 n_q2=155 n_q3=249 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.141
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.087
reference average sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.1875
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:59.16 +27:35:57.6: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:19.77 +25:30:46.3: 9.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:42.55 +25:09:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:03.67 +24:46:34.2: 9.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:12.85 +24:47:42.6: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:53.66 +24:26:44.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:06.39 +25:08:22.2: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:59.16 +27:35:57.6: 9.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:19.77 +25:30:46.3: 9.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:42.55 +25:09:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:42.55 +25:09:42.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:59.16 +27:35:57.6: ref_mag=9.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8005 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:19.77 +25:30:46.3: ref_mag=9.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8123 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:08.12 +24:35:27.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:03.67 +24:46:34.2: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:12.85 +24:47:42.6: 9.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:53.66 +24:26:44.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:53.66 +24:26:44.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:06.39 +25:08:22.2: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:03.67 +24:46:34.2: ref_mag=9.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8874 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:03.32 +24:38:41.2: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:12.85 +24:47:42.6: ref_mag=9.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9489 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:06.39 +25:08:22.2: ref_mag=9.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0761 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:08.12 +24:35:27.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:08.12 +24:35:27.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:03.32 +24:38:41.2: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:03.32 +24:38:41.2: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4386 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:20:53.88 +24:59:44.9: 10.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:32.35 +25:20:03.0: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:33:59.08 +27:07:24.9: 10.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:48.08 +29:23:25.1: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:22:10.28 +31:21:53.4: 11.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:20:53.88 +24:59:44.9: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:32.35 +25:20:03.0: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:53.88 +24:59:44.9: ref_mag=10.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5887 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:32.35 +25:20:03.0: ref_mag=10.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6333 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:33:59.08 +27:07:24.9: 10.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.57 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:59.08 +27:07:24.9: ref_mag=10.57 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6915 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:48.08 +29:23:25.1: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:11:48.08 +29:23:25.1: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5858 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:22:10.28 +31:21:53.4: 11.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:22:10.28 +31:21:53.4: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1532 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05539.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07739.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20881_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20881_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:21.60 +25:11:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:11.01 +25:44:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20888_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20888_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:54.31 +25:34:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20890_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20890_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:16.17 +25:01:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20892_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20892_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20895_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20895_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:50.25 +27:11:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20899_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20899_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:59.54 +25:43:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20900_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20900_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:44.44 +25:53:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20902_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20902_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20904_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20904_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:34.07 +25:03:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20905_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20905_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20906_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20906_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:30.91 +26:40:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20907_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20907_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20910_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20910_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:46.89 +25:24:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20919_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20919_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20920_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20920_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20926_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20926_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:49.58 +25:53:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20927_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20927_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:46.70 +26:24:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20928_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20928_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20929_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20929_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:39.55 +25:07:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20931_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20931_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:07.46 +25:26:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20945_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20945_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20970_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20970_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07739_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 07739_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05539_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 05539_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05084_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 05084_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:08.01 +31:52:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:22:10.28 +31:21:53.4
04:11:48.08 +29:23:25.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:57.524 +29:57:51.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 03:59:57.524 +29:57:51.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0353 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:57.411 +29:58:17.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 03:59:57.411 +29:58:17.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0285 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:57.524 +29:57:51.97
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:57.411 +29:58:17.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00715 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B23bHtfrGv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3oEbkIR8cq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HuC93ijOx0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pq6mlO6YYY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3115 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3115 deg
Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4807 out of 6112 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6112 out of 98825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 130 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.B23bHtfrGv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158
Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=274 n_q2=232 n_q3=164 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3oEbkIR8cq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800
Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=274 n_q2=233 n_q3=164 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HuC93ijOx0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=561, bad_region=1, passed=17458
Got 17458 stars (including 16874 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=310 n_q2=151 n_q3=249 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pq6mlO6YYY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=490, bad_region=1, passed=16792
Got 16792 stars (including 16286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=310 n_q2=151 n_q3=256 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-18-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_052008_TTUQ1b1x1_4111134_1I6vg6NB/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:42.58 +25:09:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:19.77 +25:30:46.5: 9.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:59.17 +27:35:57.7: 9.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:53.59 +24:26:44.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:12.87 +24:47:42.8: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:06.39 +25:08:22.4: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:03.67 +24:46:34.2: 9.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:59.17 +27:35:57.7: 9.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:42.58 +25:09:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:42.58 +25:09:42.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:19.77 +25:30:46.5: 9.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.60 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:59.17 +27:35:57.7: ref_mag=9.60 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7955 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:19.77 +25:30:46.5: ref_mag=9.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7960 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:12.87 +24:47:42.8: 9.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:12.87 +24:47:42.8: ref_mag=9.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9495 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:03.67 +24:46:34.2: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:53.59 +24:26:44.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:53.59 +24:26:44.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:06.39 +25:08:22.4: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:03.67 +24:46:34.2: ref_mag=9.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8677 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:06.39 +25:08:22.4: ref_mag=9.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0639 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:03.33 +24:38:41.2: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:53:04.32 +25:32:41.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:20:53.88 +24:59:45.1: 10.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:32.34 +25:20:03.3: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:03.33 +24:38:41.2: 10.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:38.91 +27:00:09.5: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:53:04.32 +25:32:41.2: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:03.33 +24:38:41.2: ref_mag=10.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4295 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:53:04.32 +25:32:41.2: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7077 delta=2.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:33:59.08 +27:07:24.9: 10.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:20:46.10 +24:43:22.4: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:28.13 +27:58:51.8: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:17.00 +25:15:39.3: 10.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:20:53.88 +24:59:45.1: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:53.88 +24:59:45.1: ref_mag=10.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5674 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:32.34 +25:20:03.3: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:38.91 +27:00:09.5: 10.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.75 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:32.34 +25:20:03.3: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6097 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:38.91 +27:00:09.5: ref_mag=10.75 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7618 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:33:59.08 +27:07:24.9: 10.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:17.00 +25:15:39.3: 10.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.57 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:59.08 +27:07:24.9: ref_mag=10.57 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6360 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:20:46.10 +24:43:22.4: 10.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:17.00 +25:15:39.3: ref_mag=10.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8424 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:28.13 +27:58:51.8: 10.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.88 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.92 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:46.10 +24:43:22.4: ref_mag=10.88 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9230 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:28.13 +27:58:51.8: ref_mag=10.92 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8718 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:25.34 +27:22:02.8: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:27.66 +27:19:51.5: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:38:21.82 +34:00:29.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:25.34 +27:22:02.8: 10.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:30.51 +25:26:53.8: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:22:49.31 +25:11:22.1: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:25.34 +27:22:02.8: ref_mag=10.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9752 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:27.66 +27:19:51.5: 10.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:27.66 +27:19:51.5: ref_mag=10.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9899 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:38:21.82 +34:00:29.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:21.82 +34:00:29.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:30.51 +25:26:53.8: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:30.51 +25:26:53.8: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9878 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:22:49.31 +25:11:22.1: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.87 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:49.31 +25:11:22.1: ref_mag=10.87 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0684 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:32.44 +24:46:36.9: 11.04 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:56:48.33 +27:33:43.2: 16.05 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:47.06 +25:24:32.9: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:32.44 +24:46:36.9: 11.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:56:48.33 +27:33:43.2: 16.07 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:32.44 +24:46:36.9: ref_mag=11.04 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1438 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.06 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:56:48.33 +27:33:43.2: ref_mag=16.06 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=11.5074 delta=4.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:47.06 +25:24:32.9: 11.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:47.06 +25:24:32.9: ref_mag=11.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3476 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:04.84 +24:45:16.8: 11.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:20:56.49 +24:48:09.0: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:15.51 +24:50:45.4: 11.34 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:04.84 +24:45:16.8: 11.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:04.84 +24:45:16.8: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5929 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:20:56.49 +24:48:09.0: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:20:53.11 +24:52:23.6: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:56.49 +24:48:09.0: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5836 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:15.51 +24:50:45.4: 11.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:15.51 +24:50:45.4: ref_mag=11.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5269 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:31:38.04 +27:46:41.8: 11.34 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:13:28.75 +29:35:01.4: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:20:53.11 +24:52:23.6: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:53.11 +24:52:23.6: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6547 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:31:38.04 +27:46:41.8: 11.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:13:28.75 +29:35:01.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:38.04 +27:46:41.8: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4799 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:22.06 +26:57:03.1: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:22.06 +26:57:03.1: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:22.06 +26:57:03.1: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8237 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:08.83 +28:05:49.2: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:40.85 +24:40:32.4: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:34:30.37 +28:04:03.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:57.75 +27:10:39.5: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:29.82 +25:53:47.5: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:08.83 +28:05:49.2: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:08.83 +28:05:49.2: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0467 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:40.85 +24:40:32.4: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:40.85 +24:40:32.4: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0915 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:34:30.37 +28:04:03.0: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:57.75 +27:10:39.5: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:30.37 +28:04:03.0: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0063 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:57.75 +27:10:39.5: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9026 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:23.38 +25:16:49.9: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:29.82 +25:53:47.5: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:29.82 +25:53:47.5: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0088 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:32:30.96 +26:38:15.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:23.38 +25:16:49.9: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:28.04 +24:35:35.1: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:23.38 +25:16:49.9: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1755 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:34:42.45 +34:03:43.0: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:32:30.96 +26:38:15.0: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:28.04 +24:35:35.1: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:30.96 +26:38:15.0: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3225 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:28.04 +24:35:35.1: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0359 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:34:42.45 +34:03:43.0: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:42.45 +34:03:43.0: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5829 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:10:37.97 +34:15:54.7: 12.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:47:33.78 +29:58:50.9: 12.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:33:05.71 +29:46:41.5: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:10:37.97 +34:15:54.7: 12.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:10:37.97 +34:15:54.7: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0564 delta=1.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:09:53.65 +32:11:54.0: 13.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:47:33.78 +29:58:50.9: 12.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:50:28.17 +27:40:06.0: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:47:33.78 +29:58:50.9: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8069 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:00.11 +30:22:17.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:33:05.71 +29:46:41.5: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:05.71 +29:46:41.5: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4382 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:51:52.53 +30:25:24.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:09:53.65 +32:11:54.0: 13.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:50:28.17 +27:40:06.0: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:09:53.65 +32:11:54.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2131 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:50:28.17 +27:40:06.0: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9177 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:00.11 +30:22:17.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:21:00.11 +30:22:17.0: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4782 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:51:52.53 +30:25:24.4: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:51:52.53 +30:25:24.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3760 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:37:15.18 +33:48:47.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:37:15.18 +33:48:47.9: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:37:15.18 +33:48:47.9: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6674 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:26:14.87 +25:24:32.9: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:26:14.87 +25:24:32.9: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:14.87 +25:24:32.9: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0272 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:25:17.19 +28:04:40.9: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:14:12.95 +33:56:53.8: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:27:22.78 +33:35:45.7: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:25:17.19 +28:04:40.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:25:17.19 +28:04:40.9: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5181 delta=1.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:14:12.95 +33:56:53.8: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:12.95 +33:56:53.8: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2061 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:27:22.78 +33:35:45.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:27:22.78 +33:35:45.7: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3826 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11025.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11217.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117665.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117738.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117801.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16042.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50690.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51908.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87946.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96865.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117604_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117604_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:21.59 +25:11:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117607_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117607_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:11.03 +25:44:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117611_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117611_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:54.31 +25:34:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117613_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117613_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:16.17 +25:01:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117616_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117616_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117618_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117618_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:50.23 +27:11:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117623_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117623_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:44.44 +25:53:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117624_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117624_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:59.54 +25:43:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117627_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117627_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117630_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117630_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117631_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117631_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:34.06 +25:03:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:30.91 +26:40:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117633_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117633_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117637_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117637_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:46.88 +25:24:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117644_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117644_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117648_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117648_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117651_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117651_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:46.71 +26:24:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117652_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117652_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:49.58 +25:53:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117654_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117654_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:39.55 +25:07:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117660_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117660_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117663_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117663_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:07.50 +25:26:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117665_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 117665_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117672_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117672_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117680_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117680_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117682_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117682_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:34.17 +26:27:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117684_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117684_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117691_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117691_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117694_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117694_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117695_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117695_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117699_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117699_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.37 +25:00:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117703_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117703_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:29.69 +26:09:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117704_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117704_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117711_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117711_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117712_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117712_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117717_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117717_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117718_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117718_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117719_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117719_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:13.14 +25:48:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117722_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117722_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:33.34 +26:01:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117725_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117725_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:09.48 +26:11:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117727_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117727_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:39.47 +25:44:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117728_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117728_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117731_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117731_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:39.93 +26:13:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:45.46 +25:19:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117738_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 117738_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:05.67 +26:24:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117745_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117745_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:42.03 +26:07:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117746_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117746_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:03.24 +25:15:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117747_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117747_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117750_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117750_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.18 +31:27:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117754_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117754_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:18.47 +25:31:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117757_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117757_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:09.13 +26:41:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117761_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117761_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:30.34 +26:28:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117763_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117763_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:04.89 +24:55:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117766_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117766_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:29.11 +24:56:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117767_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117767_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117768_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117768_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:09.76 +25:32:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117771_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117771_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117772_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117772_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:17.58 +25:42:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117778_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117778_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:01.53 +25:23:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117781_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117781_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:24.99 +25:13:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:02.95 +26:30:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117787_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117787_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:56.87 +25:47:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117788_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117788_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117790_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117790_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:41.80 +25:00:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117791_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117791_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.07 +33:34:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117801_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 117801_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117806_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117806_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117808_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117808_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:11.23 +25:20:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117821_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117821_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:17.81 +26:09:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117824_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117824_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:15.46 +25:59:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117833_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117833_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117852_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117852_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:42.18 +26:08:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:31.30 +25:25:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117877_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117877_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:24.89 +27:22:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:57.10 +25:44:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117897_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117897_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:07.45 +25:45:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117907_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117907_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:39.41 +25:33:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117910_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117910_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:12.46 +25:27:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:07.62 +26:12:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117914_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117914_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117915_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117915_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117922_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117922_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:18.18 +31:52:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117925_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117925_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:44.63 +26:33:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117930_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117930_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117937_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117937_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117960_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117960_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:24.91 +25:30:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117980_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117980_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:05.87 +26:39:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117981_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117981_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117986_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 117986_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:15.72 +25:40:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118022_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 118022_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118038_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 118038_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118054_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 118054_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118060_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 118060_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:53.23 +26:04:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118062_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 118062_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:26.85 +35:06:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118120_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 118120_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:00.83 +34:01:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98390_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 98390_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:02.55 +25:42:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55900_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 55900_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 39689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:10.27 +31:21:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 87946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34592_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 34592_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50690_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 50690_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 51908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110107_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 110107_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.28 +33:02:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69863_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 69863_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59400_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 59400_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:48.05 +29:23:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14517_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 14517_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.99 +25:42:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16042_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 16042_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 82737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:42.34 +26:47:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:01.12 +28:53:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62930_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 62930_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:00.06 +29:00:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37002_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 37002_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:08.00 +31:52:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87712_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 87712_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:36.26 +27:36:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32803_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 32803_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:19.35 +32:17:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24725_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 24725_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:32.79 +33:05:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75576_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 75576_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.66 +26:28:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 34632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:09.85 +31:57:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70275_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 70275_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:19.16 +25:34:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86163_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 86163_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:34.95 +25:37:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 86796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:20.90 +27:21:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39135_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 39135_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.33 +31:26:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04036_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 04036_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-19-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
