NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-09-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 01 18.32251    2461058.82251    13.91    09:23:16.39 +49:30:15.9   3697 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 01 18.32304    2461058.82304    13.99    09:23:16.42 +49:30:15.6   3699 5410   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14268    2461225.64268    13.28    09:23:16.43 +49:30:14.6   6055 1027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    12.90    09:23:17.27 +49:30:15.9   6056 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 04.1430  2461225.6430  13.09  09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3
168.91940  44.60897 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.2" and 1.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3:  13.93 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3:  13.99 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.96 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMa-09-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 365706 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 365706 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits

renamed 'UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1544.1208 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 438.2134 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1510.6581 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 430.8224 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.43891 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.017 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-03T22:25:17.7665376' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-04T03:25:17.7665376' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61225.1425667363 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-04T03:25:27.6710188' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61225.1426813775 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.997586417495 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9994700502962 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 25.2919444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 309.736111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.33053060067053 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.08 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 3.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits :) Spent 0.511016 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.0599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-03T22:26:15.7261763' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-04T03:26:15.7261763' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61225.1432375694 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-04T03:26:25.6311072' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61225.1433522105 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.99758643927 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9994700669874 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 25.1372222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 309.81 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.34378648550204 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.0599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.0599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.08 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 3.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits :) Spent 0.526339 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461225.64268248 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:30.194 +46:00:24.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 Second-epoch image center 09:36:30.194 +46:00:24.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0856 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:31.743 +46:00:18.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 Second-epoch image center 09:36:31.743 +46:00:18.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0900 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:30.194 +46:00:24.01 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:31.743 +46:00:18.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00478 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mzohrky8JM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zbSdf5fxkm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.18oCamZgyA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AxKzQwabhB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.900300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.900300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8864 to +51.4195 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8864 to 51.4195 deg Loaded 5366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3787 out of 3997 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3997 out of 8217 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 13.7 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 13.8 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.mzohrky8JM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, bad_region=1781, passed=8167 Got 8167 stars (including 5926 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6548 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6548 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6548 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=275 n_q2=192 n_q3=318 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.zbSdf5fxkm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, bad_region=1781, passed=8217 Got 8217 stars (including 5974 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 978 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=275 n_q2=190 n_q3=323 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.18oCamZgyA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=172, bad_region=697, passed=3198 Got 3198 stars (including 2360 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3198 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2578 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2577 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2577 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=333 n_q2=168 n_q3=303 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.AxKzQwabhB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=188, bad_region=679, passed=3253 Got 3253 stars (including 2421 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3253 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=304 n_q2=197 n_q3=300 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.268 ref2=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.221 new1=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.111 new2=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.051 reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.2445 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:30.194 +46:00:24.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 Second-epoch image center 09:36:30.194 +46:00:24.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0856 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:31.743 +46:00:18.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 Second-epoch image center 09:36:31.743 +46:00:18.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0900 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:30.194 +46:00:24.01 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:31.743 +46:00:18.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00478 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MVlumzV5bf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fUsyPxIlZb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sLuB1HrvF5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.izqY3l0yFs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.793550 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.793550 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8196 to +51.4197 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8196 to 51.4197 deg Loaded 5437 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3556 out of 4005 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4005 out of 43644 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 27 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.0 pix UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.0 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 14.0 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 14.0 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.MVlumzV5bf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2151, bad_region=7381, passed=43815 Got 43815 stars (including 34536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43815 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37222 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37222 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37222 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=268 n_q2=190 n_q3=323 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.fUsyPxIlZb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2132, bad_region=7360, passed=43635 Got 43635 stars (including 34374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43635 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=266 n_q2=192 n_q3=325 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.sLuB1HrvF5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=825, bad_region=2835, passed=19298 Got 19298 stars (including 15807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19298 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16882 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16882 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16882 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=321 n_q2=175 n_q3=304 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.izqY3l0yFs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1071, bad_region=2813, passed=19562 Got 19562 stars (including 15895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19562 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17172 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17172 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=300 n_q2=200 n_q3=295 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:13:46.53 +43:50:19.1: 13.23 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:13:46.53 +43:50:19.1: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:13:46.53 +43:50:19.1: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9036 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0151 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35148.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52612_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 52612_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    10.07    09:13:01.31 +48:30:51.4   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52663_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 52663_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    10.22    09:43:55.73 +47:39:03.6   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52679_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 52679_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    10.35    09:11:50.47 +45:39:57.0   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52804_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 52804_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    10.58    10:01:44.76 +44:04:28.9   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52911_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 52911_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    10.92    09:50:30.29 +46:26:32.8   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52946_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 52946_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    11.11    09:14:19.73 +49:28:00.6   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53124_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 53124_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    11.47    09:20:03.33 +50:06:34.5   6349 0637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53675_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 53675_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    12.14    09:24:46.76 +42:03:01.9   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53748_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 53748_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    12.31    09:17:34.15 +42:14:54.9   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53893_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 53893_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    12.35    09:30:31.40 +43:33:46.8   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53895_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 53895_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    12.21    10:00:39.58 +43:38:50.3   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54405_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 54405_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    12.89    09:15:09.29 +48:29:37.5   6906 1578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54626_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 54626_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 04.14268    2461225.64268    12.84    09:13:46.46 +43:50:18.3   7288 4379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-25-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.00    09:13:46.61 +43:50:20.0   7290 4377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54851_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 54851_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    12.82    09:36:39.37 +46:10:08.7   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55150_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 55150_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.01    09:34:16.94 +49:03:26.4   4982 1344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits **** FOUND 09:34:16.98 +49:03:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55279_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 55279_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.43    09:31:35.53 +42:59:35.8   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55989_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 55989_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.49    09:48:28.94 +46:16:38.8   3539 3028   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56053_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 56053_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.55    09:26:16.85 +44:34:21.9   5905 4024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits **** FOUND 09:26:16.90 +44:34:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56296_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 56296_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.77    09:42:11.83 +48:46:41.8   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56386_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 56386_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.49    09:49:22.67 +47:10:06.4   3458 2487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56445_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 56445_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.77    10:00:36.70 +45:25:54.3   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56449_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 56449_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.54    09:58:13.52 +46:28:09.0   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56482_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 56482_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.95    09:24:34.22 +49:24:09.3   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56888_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 56888_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.82    09:54:35.57 +45:26:11.2   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56948_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 56948_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.81    09:15:53.83 +46:14:48.4   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56987_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 The candidate 56987_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 04.14335    2461225.64335    13.61    09:43:56.26 +45:51:39.1   4011 3286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-03_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_222727_TTUQ2b1x1_76772_Cy3c4vvl/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits **** FOUND 09:43:56.28 +45:51:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35148_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 Preparing report for the candidate 35148_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-03_22-26-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0029 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3 ########### Completed UMa-09-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3 ################################################################################### 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 09:23:16.85 +49:30:15.3 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461225.64268248 -observatory V36 07:45:52.83 +17:50:36.6 Mercury (3.0mag) 09:45:05.35 +15:18:26.3 Venus (-4.1mag) 04:05:46.66 +20:34:33.1 Mars (1.3mag) 08:11:03.60 +20:28:49.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:02.88 +03:17:18.7 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:06:00.25 +20:41:43.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:17:00.82 +00:20:58.5 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:31:28.25 -23:15:16.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 22:04:14.23 -12:47:50.1 Moon (-11.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 3 22:30 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461225.64268248: 08:10:59.70 +20:29:02.4 Io (6.1mag) 08:11:14.94 +20:28:08.6 Europa (6.3mag) 08:11:18.39 +20:27:54.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:10:55.48 +20:29:23.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 08:09:53.18 +20:10:36.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:11:01.79 +20:28:56.5 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:09:17.52 +20:16:39.7 Elara (17.6mag) 08:14:23.22 +20:26:20.2 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:16:22.14 +20:33:04.2 Carme (18.9mag) 00:55:06.71 +03:17:43.5 Titan (8.6mag) 00:55:06.57 +03:17:23.8 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:54:43.05 +03:17:41.9 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:55:14.51 +03:16:47.7 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:55:11.89 +03:15:27.1 Phoebe (16.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 3 22:30 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461225.64268248: 17:40:02.64 -34:07:50.5 JWST 21:30:25.97 -29:41:08.3 Chandra 18:55:10.22 -13:37:32.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 3 22:30 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461225.64268248 -observatory V36 02:27:16.55 +13:39:37.4 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:22:54.36 -34:09:07.7 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:19:26.12 -68:03:38.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:58:36.32 +32:20:41.0 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:05:00.82 +16:03:02.2 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 01:07:35.34 -06:06:27.2 15.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:02:59.72 +32:15:24.5 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:05:13.15 +26:58:17.2 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:50:11.24 +30:03:15.1 16.8mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:05:46.89 +04:51:42.8 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:11:06.61 +21:29:37.7 17.9mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:12:25.27 -11:15:41.5 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:56:13.16 +67:35:30.1 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:43:51.35 -09:25:12.9 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 07:50:07.20 +65:23:22.5 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:24:31.65 +29:40:17.7 14.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:19:35.05 +15:07:39.0 17.5mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:48:53.98 +38:04:32.9 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:53:31.12 +45:01:11.6 17.9mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:43:41.89 -14:06:29.1 15.8mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:29:18.94 +30:06:13.8 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:09:44.59 -12:22:53.3 16.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:49:06.65 +22:40:58.3 17.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:42:47.36 +04:10:39.8 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:10:08.32 +78:51:14.3 17.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:39:08.79 +44:57:08.7 16.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:21:47.08 +03:20:54.6 16.9mag A/2026 E1 21:08:59.39 -13:04:37.6 7.5mag 10P/Tempel 11:10:41.26 -01:38:27.6 16.1mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:51:05.72 +28:51:35.2 17.8mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:55:03.14 +15:58:21.5 17.0mag 63P/Wild 00:45:18.06 -05:12:24.7 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 08:07:21.51 +34:25:40.7 17.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 04:12:18.61 +19:47:48.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:11:49.24 +09:41:33.8 16.1mag 88P/Howell 06:16:43.75 +30:48:53.2 15.6mag 93P/Lovas 04:01:03.69 +30:45:19.1 17.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:53:29.67 +31:20:23.0 15.3mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:36:38.44 +03:43:52.8 16.7mag 124P/Mrkos 04:41:40.48 +20:36:20.7 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:24:25.07 +19:43:26.2 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:35:48.17 +14:26:10.2 17.8mag 141P/Machholz 07:35:12.99 +14:29:37.1 17.8mag 141P-A/Machholz 06:49:35.96 +18:17:49.5 14.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:13:53.57 -21:39:52.8 15.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 05:10:47.64 +32:27:44.0 15.2mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:17:15.26 +11:39:08.3 15.2mag 169P/NEAT 01:25:51.35 +06:49:23.7 17.7mag 220P/McNaught 16:37:23.59 -08:11:30.2 16.9mag 235P/LINEAR 08:32:02.61 +33:50:32.7 17.8mag 240P/NEAT 20:43:53.80 -48:05:18.1 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 01:42:03.44 +09:11:24.3 15.8mag 260P/McNaught 05:18:31.46 +36:15:34.5 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR 15:07:15.53 +06:34:45.1 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 08:29:04.26 +19:55:08.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:41:55.96 +39:43:27.3 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jul 3 22:30 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 2026-06-26.38 16.07 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 2026-06-26.38 16.07 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 3 22:30 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 3 22:30 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 11:06:55.391 -04:07:04.72 AT 2026qqg 2026-06-27.97 18.081 05:12:36.560 -58:31:08.03 AT 2026qqf 2026-06-24.41 18.215 12:37:59.373 +03:20:56.02 AT 2026qqe 2026-06-25.05 18.266 01:16:11.239 -55:40:02.88 AT 2026qqd 2026-06-24.38 18.401 00:39:40.551 -56:06:55.52 AT 2026qqc 2026-06-24.36 18.488 12:32:13.060 +56:22:40.90 AT 2026qqb 2026-06-27.90 18.72 03:43:49.750 -46:38:15.17 AT 2026qqa 2026-06-23.42 18.775 22:17:40.013 -69:03:01.29 AT 2026qpz 2026-06-24.32 18.664 06:02:54.764 -64:43:45.31 AT 2026qpy 2026-06-24.42 18.203 03:53:30.876 -61:08:18.46 AT 2026qpx 2026-06-24.40 19.168 22:14:03.242 -69:42:16.35 AT 2026qpw 2026-06-24.32 18.492 02:45:25.609 -72:49:10.62 AT 2026qpv 2026-06-24.28 18.66 22:23:59.673 -56:53:22.70 AT 2026qpu 2026-06-24.26 18.368 22:19:02.300 -73:18:27.39 AT 2026qpt 2026-06-27.23 18.613 22:27:21.353 -60:19:54.61 AT 2026qps 2026-06-24.29 19.027 04:05:50.523 -70:24:32.93 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-27.32 16.645 00:33:39.346 -43:56:51.28 AT 2026qpq 2026-06-28.42 22.6478 23:39:26.302 -01:34:20.01 AT 2026qpp 2026-06-28.35 21.3338 03:51:59.399 -47:42:56.98 AT 2026qpo 2026-06-26.42 21.649 00:41:12.135 -42:56:50.58 AT 2026qpn 2026-06-26.42 23.8086 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 3 22:30 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C