NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Sco-04-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Sco-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Sco-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Sco-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 384735 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 384735 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.png' -> 'transient_report/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits_preview.png'
Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits

renamed 'Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.png' -> 'transient_report/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits_preview.png'
Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3224.9215 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 999.2040 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 11082.7504 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 3599.6178 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 11222.3170 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 3485.5156 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.4366 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.033 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-01T23:36:55.8618302' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-02T04:36:55.8618302' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61223.1923132059 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-02T04:37:05.7664716' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61223.1924278471 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 266.085252910135 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.9996405843998 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.95 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.373055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.90902547611342 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Sco-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '17 44 21' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 19.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 81.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/d_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits :) Spent 0.849398 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/d_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-01T23:38:01.5405776' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-02T04:38:01.5405776' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61223.1930733798 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-02T04:38:11.4452683' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61223.193188021 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 266.085252878729 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.999640560544 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.015 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.606111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.90012058682338 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Sco-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '17 44 21' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 19.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 81.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/d_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits :) Spent 0.779889 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/d_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits


fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461223.69242895 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits' wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits' wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits Image size: 937.7'x625.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:44:19.661 -34:00:22.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:44:19.144 -33:59:11.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 17:44:19.661 -34:00:22.99 Second-epoch image center 17:44:19.144 -33:59:11.91 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0198 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:44:16.322 -33:59:12.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 17:44:19.661 -34:00:22.99 Second-epoch image center 17:44:16.322 -33:59:12.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 17:44:19.144 -33:59:11.91 Second-epoch second image center 17:44:16.322 -33:59:12.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00975 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits &> /tmp/tmp.241Pp9FjdL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i6KxJJFdmf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jsdWu6ioit Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.knRuxbAgu5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits and wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits and wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits and wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 14994 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 256.0363 to 276.0323 deg, Dec -39.2747 to -28.4483 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 256.0363 to 276.0323 deg, Dec -39.2747 to -28.4483 deg Loaded 23671 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11069 out of 11588 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 11588 out of 14994 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.682500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.682500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.73 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.95 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.95
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 14994 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 256.0363 to 276.0323 deg, Dec -39.2747 to -28.4483 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 256.0363 to 276.0323 deg, Dec -39.2747 to -28.4483 deg Loaded 23671 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11069 out of 11588 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 11588 out of 14994 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 15534 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 256.0035 to 276.0291 deg, Dec -39.2746 to -28.4478 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 256.0035 to 276.0291 deg, Dec -39.2746 to -28.4478 deg Loaded 23700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11334 out of 11890 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 11890 out of 15534 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits 2.4 pix Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits 3.1 pix fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 3.2 pix fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 13.9 mag. Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits 14.0 mag. Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits 12.8 mag. fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 12.6 mag. fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.241Pp9FjdL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1345, bad_region=1, passed=14994 Got 14994 stars (including 13634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14994 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14451 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14449 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14450 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.07" Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1003) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.877 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.117 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.847 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.042 n_q1=195 n_q2=294 n_q3=198 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273 The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits -region wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.i6KxJJFdmf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1404, bad_region=0, passed=15534 Got 15534 stars (including 14119 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15534 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14820 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14819 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14819 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.07" Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1004) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.887 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.133 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.897 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.126 n_q1=202 n_q2=300 n_q3=194 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278 The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits -region wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.jsdWu6ioit (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=249, bad_region=0, passed=3507 Got 3507 stars (including 3253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3507 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 858 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3292 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3291 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3288 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 1001) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.124 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.689 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.584 n_q1=99 n_q2=97 n_q3=308 n_q4=405 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.727 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.knRuxbAgu5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=217, bad_region=0, passed=3042 Got 3042 stars (including 2822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3042 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2913 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2914 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66" Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1006) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.690 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.896 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.100 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.655 n_q1=181 n_q2=149 n_q3=192 n_q4=390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.593 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits sigma_overall=0.877 worst_q_ratio=1.273 ref2=Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits sigma_overall=0.887 worst_q_ratio=1.278 new1=fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits sigma_overall=0.619 worst_q_ratio=2.727 new2=fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits sigma_overall=0.690 worst_q_ratio=1.593 reference average sigma_overall=0.882 worst_q_ratio=1.2755 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits) flagged: sigma=0.619 (ref avg 0.882), ratio=2.727 (ref avg 1.2755), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2. Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 3035 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1869359.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out1869359.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 94.8195 (1.51218e+41), 8 match, 0 conflict, 6 distractors, 12 index. RA,Dec = (266.068,-33.9886), pixel scale 5.97894 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-++--+++--+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4117.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1869359.solved to indicate this. Field: out1869359.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (266.080175, -33.986876) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:44:19.242, -33:59:12.755). Field size: 15.7891 x 10.589 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 3.50076 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' -> 'fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 2 00:01 fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 2 00:01 out1869359.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits (fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1869359.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out1869359.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7217 degrees of RA,Dec (266.081,-33.9861) log-odds ratio 35.2594 (2.05571e+15), 6 match, 0 conflict, 10 distractors, 26 index. RA,Dec = (266.068,-34.0099), pixel scale 5.95834 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-+-+------+++(best)--------------------------------+----------------------------+---------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1869359.solved to indicate this. Field: out1869359.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (266.079435, -33.989685) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:44:19.064, -33:59:22.867). Field size: 15.7823 x 10.5857 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 3.49468 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 2 00:01 fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 2 00:02 out1869359.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 26215 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6332, 953.901] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 33.0093 (2.16647e+14), 6 match, 0 conflict, 40 distractors, 12 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----++-------+-------------------+----+-----+(best)-----------------------+---------------------------+-- --> log-odds 33.0093 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 136.374 (1.68453e+59), 23 match, 0 conflict, 260 distractors, 26 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----++-------+------+-+--+-------+-+--+----++-----+-----------------+----+--+---------------+---+-- --> log-odds 136.374 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 270.768 (3.91716e+117), 46 match, 0 conflict, 405 distractors, 50 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---++-------+-----++-+--+-++-+--+---++-----+-----+-++------+-------+----+--+---------------+---+-- --> log-odds 270.768 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 552.783 (1.17642e+240), 85 match, 0 conflict, 328 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+++----+-+-----++++--++++-+--+-+++++---++++---+-++--+---+-----+++----+-+++-----++++----++---+-- --> log-odds 552.783 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1169.03 (inf), 180 match, 0 conflict, 572 distractors, 201 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++++--+-+-++-+++++++--++++++--+-+++++-+-++++---++++--+---++----+++++--+-++++----++++-+--++--++-- --> log-odds 1169.03 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2112.2 (inf), 335 match, 0 conflict, 857 distractors, 387 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++++--+++-++-+++++++--++++++--+++++++-++++++--++++++-+--+++++--++-+++-+-++++---+++++-+++++++++++ --> log-odds 2112.2 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3615.69 (inf), 624 match, 0 conflict, 1269 distractors, 741 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++++--+++-++-+++++++--++++++--+++++++-++++++--++++++-++-+++++-+++-+++-+-++++--++++++-+++++++++++ --> log-odds 3615.69 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 6345.8 (inf), 1225 match, 0 conflict, 2710 distractors, 1478 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++++--+++-++-+++++++--++++++--+++++++-++++++--++++++-++-+++++-+++-+++-++++++--++-+++-+++++++++++ --> log-odds 6345.8 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6332, 953.901] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 33.0093 (2.16647e+14), 6 match, 0 conflict, 40 distractors, 12 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----++-------+-------------------+----+-----+(best)-----------------------+---------------------------+-- --> log-odds 33.0093 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 136.374 (1.68453e+59), 23 match, 0 conflict, 260 distractors, 26 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----++-------+------+-+--+-------+-+--+----++-----+-----------------+----+--+---------------+---+-- --> log-odds 136.374 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 270.768 (3.91716e+117), 46 match, 0 conflict, 405 distractors, 50 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---++-------+-----++-+--+-++-+--+---++-----+-----+-++------+-------+----+--+---------------+---+-- --> log-odds 270.768 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 552.783 (1.17642e+240), 85 match, 0 conflict, 328 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+++----+-+-----++++--++++-+--+-+++++---++++---+-++--+---+-----+++----+-+++-----++++----++---+-- --> log-odds 552.783 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1169.03 (inf), 180 match, 0 conflict, 572 distractors, 201 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++++--+-+-++-+++++++--++++++--+-+++++-+-++++---++++--+---++----+++++--+-++++----++++-+--++--++-- --> log-odds 1169.03 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2112.2 (inf), 335 match, 0 conflict, 857 distractors, 387 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++++--+++-++-+++++++--++++++--+++++++-++++++--++++++-+--+++++--++-+++-+-++++---+++++-+++++++++++ --> log-odds 2112.2 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3615.69 (inf), 624 match, 0 conflict, 1269 distractors, 741 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++++--+++-++-+++++++--++++++--+++++++-++++++--++++++-++-+++++-+++-+++-+-++++--++++++-+++++++++++ --> log-odds 3615.69 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 6345.8 (inf), 1225 match, 0 conflict, 2710 distractors, 1478 index. RA,Dec = (266.078,-33.9905), pixel scale 5.97682 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++++--+++-++-+++++++--++++++--+++++++-++++++--++++++-++-+++++-+++-+++-++++++--++-+++-+++++++++++ --> log-odds 6345.8 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (266.077140, -33.987757) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:44:18.513, -33:59:15.927). Field size: 15.788 x 10.5864 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 3.4993 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits Generating wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits Image size: 943.1'x628.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:44:18.768 -33:59:13.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 3507 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1885647.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=249, bad_region=0, passed=3507 Got 3507 stars (including 3253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3507 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013099 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010479 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 788 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.11" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3209 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3219 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.16" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.34" Excluding outliers - 868 stars left (next iteration limit 924) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits N_match=868 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.233 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.630 sigma_q2_arcsec=3.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.438 n_q1=99 n_q2=96 n_q3=307 n_q4=366 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.538 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits): sigma 0.619->2.233, ratio 2.727->1.538; reverting to order 3 WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=2.233 -- 2.53x the reference average (0.882); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526_astrometric_residuals.png (910 matched stars from wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.86 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.84 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.67 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21379_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 The candidate 21379_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 02.19319    2461223.69319    9.98    18:15:06.73 -29:50:15.1   8699 5809   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits **** FOUND 18:15:06.82 -29:50:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02482_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 The candidate 02482_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 02.19319    2461223.69319    6.38    17:06:20.07 -37:13:42.3   0342 0731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits **** FOUND 17:06:20.04 -37:13:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00857_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 The candidate 00857_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 02.19319    2461223.69319    6.06    17:36:32.93 -38:38:10.8   4049 0332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits **** FOUND 17:36:32.93 -38:38:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00237_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 The candidate 00237_fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 02.19319    2461223.69319    6.04    17:42:29.26 -39:01:47.4   4764 0147   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits **** FOUND 17:42:29.26 -39:01:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits Last image: 2461223.69242895 02.07.2026 04:36:55.861 UTC ERROR running VaST on the field Sco-04-Q1b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 21.03.2026 11:25:59.757 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461120.97650182 ap= 4.6 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 170501 *matched= 170501 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-25-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0526.fits exp_start= 21.03.2026 11:29:38.815 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461120.97903721 ap= 4.6 rotation= -0.005 *detected= 174093 *matched= 152913 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-29-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0527.fits exp_start= 02.07.2026 04:36:55.861 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461223.69242895 ap= 5.3 rotation= -3.183 *detected= 38129 *matched= 36836 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-36-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits exp_start= 02.07.2026 04:38:01.540 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461223.69318912 ap= 5.3 rotation= -3.186 *detected= 32934 *matched= 31714 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-01_CI_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_234031_TTUQ1b1x1_1255048_H00YGbpk/fd_Sco-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-01_23-38-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits ########### Completed Sco-04-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461223.69242895 -observatory V36 07:48:19.42 +18:14:17.1 Mercury (2.5mag) 09:36:32.08 +16:05:18.6 Venus (-4.1mag) 04:00:00.62 +20:17:02.6 Mars (1.3mag) 08:09:18.41 +20:34:04.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:54:45.00 +03:16:00.7 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:05:36.18 +20:40:37.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:59.67 +00:20:57.8 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:31:38.33 -23:14:25.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 20:31:18.06 -21:59:32.3 Moon (-12.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 1 23:59 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461223.69242895: 08:09:17.75 +20:34:06.2 Io (6.1mag) 08:09:09.47 +20:34:37.0 Europa (6.3mag) 08:09:27.24 +20:33:38.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:08:54.63 +20:35:30.2 Callisto (6.9mag) 08:08:13.99 +20:15:12.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:09:16.53 +20:34:12.6 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:07:39.80 +20:21:48.0 Elara (17.6mag) 08:12:33.75 +20:32:39.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:14:43.28 +20:38:05.6 Carme (18.9mag) 00:54:55.57 +03:16:08.3 Titan (8.6mag) 00:54:43.38 +03:15:50.7 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:54:29.56 +03:16:46.5 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:54:50.29 +03:15:24.6 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:54:56.58 +03:14:26.4 Phoebe (16.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 1 23:59 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461223.69242895: 17:37:48.47 -34:26:05.9 JWST 15:39:07.01 +54:03:53.1 Chandra 19:22:57.66 +01:40:20.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 1 23:59 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461223.69242895 -observatory V36 02:24:24.12 +13:24:36.1 17.9mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:24:30.62 -34:04:23.9 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:17:28.38 -68:02:31.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:57:54.18 +32:18:48.9 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:05:39.27 +16:02:19.0 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 00:53:00.18 -11:11:27.5 15.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:03:59.60 +32:14:07.6 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:02:56.27 +26:58:56.2 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:48:32.54 +30:08:18.0 16.8mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:04:33.58 +04:48:45.2 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:12:21.79 +21:32:36.9 17.9mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:12:45.23 -11:13:37.3 17.7mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:58:13.83 +67:33:38.0 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:48:09.76 -09:12:40.7 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 07:46:53.59 +65:17:38.3 17.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:21:52.58 +29:33:38.0 14.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:20:41.61 +15:03:04.5 17.5mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:51:09.81 +37:37:43.6 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:55:13.18 +44:41:47.9 17.9mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:41:48.66 -14:12:58.4 15.8mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:27:37.94 +30:25:42.7 18.0mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:08:13.25 -12:14:06.4 16.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:46:59.63 +22:45:11.8 17.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:42:17.98 +04:14:39.8 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:15:53.76 +78:43:12.0 17.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:36:44.24 +44:51:23.7 16.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:20:41.67 +02:56:24.1 16.8mag A/2026 E1 21:05:44.63 -12:31:34.6 7.6mag 10P/Tempel 11:09:52.05 -01:34:12.0 16.1mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:48:12.68 +28:38:10.3 17.8mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:50:56.87 +16:34:55.7 17.0mag 63P/Wild 00:44:13.41 -05:15:22.9 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:08.68 +34:27:37.6 17.6mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 04:07:33.78 +19:39:26.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:08:22.53 +09:23:07.8 16.1mag 88P/Howell 06:10:44.32 +30:52:22.4 15.5mag 93P/Lovas 03:54:53.22 +30:36:18.9 17.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:48:43.37 +31:31:16.2 15.3mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:33:03.72 +04:32:08.7 16.7mag 124P/Mrkos 04:38:30.05 +20:31:52.4 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:20:40.17 +19:42:51.3 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:29:23.37 +14:48:49.7 17.6mag 141P/Machholz 07:28:47.05 +14:52:17.9 17.5mag 141P-A/Machholz 06:41:43.12 +18:40:18.5 14.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:12:52.28 -21:51:12.5 15.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 05:03:51.15 +31:56:46.5 15.2mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:20:21.24 +10:41:24.8 15.3mag 169P/NEAT 01:20:59.74 +06:33:21.0 17.7mag 220P/McNaught 16:38:01.69 -08:08:56.2 16.8mag 235P/LINEAR 08:27:50.52 +34:00:08.2 17.8mag 240P/NEAT 20:44:06.21 -47:35:31.0 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 01:36:41.46 +08:16:53.8 15.8mag 260P/McNaught 05:12:42.61 +36:02:55.3 17.4mag 295P/LINEAR 15:07:34.04 +06:43:57.0 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 08:27:21.06 +19:59:30.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:38:49.42 +39:52:52.0 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jul 1 23:59 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 2026-06-26.38 16.07 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 2026-06-26.38 16.07 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 1 23:59 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 1 23:59 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 20:36:20.447 -18:37:42.93 AT 2026qlw 2026-06-27.32 22.1726 20:39:08.196 -18:17:08.66 AT 2026qlv 2026-06-27.32 22.013 20:35:42.412 -18:51:45.56 AT 2026qlu 2026-06-27.32 22.279 20:34:30.295 -17:58:28.29 AT 2026qlt 2026-06-27.32 22.5325 20:29:49.674 -16:26:01.18 AT 2026qls 2026-06-27.32 20.6923 20:29:11.702 -17:13:27.89 AT 2026qlr 2026-06-27.32 21.5173 20:36:46.564 -17:19:58.86 AT 2026qlq 2026-06-27.32 22.5444 20:25:04.866 -15:27:44.35 AT 2026qlp 2026-06-27.30 22.4095 20:15:05.661 -21:08:29.35 AT 2026qlo 2026-06-27.32 21.894 20:26:19.270 -15:04:14.56 AT 2026qln 2026-06-27.30 21.5885 20:23:34.918 -16:54:23.32 AT 2026qlm 2026-06-27.29 22.4801 20:16:01.693 -19:13:28.66 AT 2026qll 2026-06-27.29 22.2643 20:11:09.049 -17:20:40.81 AT 2026qlk 2026-06-27.29 22.4629 20:11:27.950 -17:34:53.77 AT 2026qlj 2026-06-27.29 22.3295 21:01:19.516 -11:05:27.27 AT 2026qli 2026-06-27.27 21.5198 20:56:35.398 -11:12:37.35 AT 2026qlh 2026-06-27.27 22.5482 20:47:14.535 -17:32:57.37 AT 2026qlg 2026-06-27.27 22.2999 20:39:42.922 -16:55:52.16 AT 2026qlf 2026-06-27.27 22.0989 20:43:41.224 -15:16:03.56 AT 2026qle 2026-06-27.27 22.0448 20:22:25.251 -21:14:49.13 AT 2026qld 2026-06-27.32 22.2955 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jul 1 23:59 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C