This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.3891 2461219.8891 12.55 02:19:21.62 +39:02:22.2
141.04074 -20.72069 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J021921.65+390223.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.680 V 14.030 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:19:21.62 +39:02:22.2: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:19:21.62 +39:02:22.2: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 28.3891* 02 19 21.62 +39 02 22.2 12.6 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J021921.65+390223.9,2461219.8891,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J021921.65+390223.9 20260628.3891 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.3891 2461219.8891 12.37 02:25:38.01 +39:28:41.1
142.07332 -19.86692 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:25:38.01 +39:28:41.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F8 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.316+/-0.030 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:25:38.01 +39:28:41.1: 13.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:25:38.01 +39:28:41.1: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 28.3891* 02 25 38.01 +39 28 41.1 12.4 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461219.8891,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260628.3891 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.3891 2461219.8891 12.51 02:25:52.60 +39:07:51.3
142.25966 -20.17038 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:25:52.60 +39:07:51.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.389+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:25:52.60 +39:07:51.3: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:25:52.60 +39:07:51.3: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 28.3891* 02 25 52.60 +39 07 51.3 12.5 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461219.8891,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260628.3891 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.72860486 23.12.2025 05:29:01.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
First image: 2461032.72860486 23.12.2025 05:29:01.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Last image: 2461219.88929613 28.06.2026 09:20:25.186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17291
Objects passed selection criteria: 17173
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10518.2
Average stars matched: 10254.8 (97.4948 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122164 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 28 04:26:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.72860486 23.12.2025 05:29:01.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
First image: 2461032.72860486 23.12.2025 05:29:01.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Last image: 2461219.88929613 28.06.2026 09:20:25.186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 47
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 104643
Objects passed selection criteria: 104293
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 65415.5
Average stars matched: 63084.8 (96.437 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1936404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 28 04:29:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461219.88883623
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits'
wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:10:53.294 +38:00:08.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:10:53.142 +37:59:36.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:10:53.294 +38:00:08.11
Second-epoch image center 02:10:53.142 +37:59:36.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:10:53.506 +37:59:27.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:10:53.294 +38:00:08.11
Second-epoch image center 02:10:53.506 +37:59:27.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0113 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:10:53.142 +37:59:36.13
Second-epoch second image center 02:10:53.506 +37:59:27.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00263 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NoU2hDKIk3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fD6eBb9Bvo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ptIoj9VMWG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EzCwCWF3uf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits and wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits and wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits and wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 22.2405 to 43.6004 deg, Dec +32.1878 to +43.3127 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 22.2405 to 43.6004 deg, Dec 32.1878 to 43.3127 deg
Loaded 13070 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9333 out of 10127 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10127 out of 18523 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 22.2405 to 43.6004 deg, Dec +32.1878 to +43.3127 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 22.2405 to 43.6004 deg, Dec 32.1878 to 43.3127 deg
Loaded 13070 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9333 out of 10127 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10127 out of 18523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 18408 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 22.2834 to 43.6148 deg, Dec +32.1877 to +43.3132 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 22.2834 to 43.6148 deg, Dec 32.1877 to 43.3132 deg
Loaded 13051 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 10101 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10101 out of 18408 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
2.0 pix And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
3.1 pix fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
3.2 pix fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
2.0 pix wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
2.0 pix wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
15.4 mag. And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
12.0 mag. fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
12.0 mag. fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.0 (SNR ) 10.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NoU2hDKIk3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1587, bad_region=0, passed=18523
Got 18523 stars (including 16914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18523 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=231 n_q2=275 n_q3=196 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fD6eBb9Bvo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1621, bad_region=0, passed=18408
Got 18408 stars (including 16764 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=238 n_q2=266 n_q3=202 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ptIoj9VMWG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=117, bad_region=0, passed=2770
Got 2770 stars (including 2651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2770 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=160 n_q2=198 n_q3=245 n_q4=336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EzCwCWF3uf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=109, bad_region=0, passed=2591
Got 2591 stars (including 2480 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2591 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.240 n_q1=149 n_q2=201 n_q3=203 n_q4=381 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits -region wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.256
ref2=And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.059
new1=fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new2=fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.236
reference average sigma_overall=0.3505 worst_q_ratio=1.1575
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03046_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 03046_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:18.11 +41:55:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:10:53.294 +38:00:08.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:10:53.142 +37:59:36.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:10:53.294 +38:00:08.11
Second-epoch image center 02:10:53.142 +37:59:36.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:10:53.506 +37:59:27.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:10:53.294 +38:00:08.11
Second-epoch image center 02:10:53.506 +37:59:27.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0113 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:10:53.142 +37:59:36.13
Second-epoch second image center 02:10:53.506 +37:59:27.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00263 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.erOfCP5Gp2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nYtoWLhlwD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5HllbpoA3H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H5en87jJn5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits and wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits and wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits and wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 113384 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 22.2164 to 43.6004 deg, Dec +32.1473 to +43.3244 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 22.2164 to 43.6004 deg, Dec 32.1473 to 43.3244 deg
Loaded 13140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8005 out of 10343 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10343 out of 113384 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.813200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.813200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 113384 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 22.2164 to 43.6004 deg, Dec +32.1473 to +43.3244 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 22.2164 to 43.6004 deg, Dec 32.1473 to 43.3244 deg
Loaded 13140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8005 out of 10343 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10343 out of 113384 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 114316 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 22.2703 to 43.6315 deg, Dec +32.1472 to +43.3169 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 22.2703 to 43.6315 deg, Dec 32.1472 to 43.3169 deg
Loaded 13111 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7970 out of 10336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10336 out of 114316 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 43 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
1.9 pix And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.9 pix fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
2.9 pix fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
1.9 pix wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
1.9 pix wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
15.5 mag. And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
12.8 mag. fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
12.8 mag. fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.erOfCP5Gp2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=10724, bad_region=9, passed=113353
Got 113353 stars (including 102434 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 113353 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=229 n_q2=272 n_q3=198 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nYtoWLhlwD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=10865, bad_region=9, passed=114291
Got 114291 stars (including 103221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 114291 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=224 n_q2=274 n_q3=207 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5HllbpoA3H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=484, bad_region=1, passed=18305
Got 18305 stars (including 17793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=162 n_q2=197 n_q3=249 n_q4=333 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.H5en87jJn5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=553, bad_region=1, passed=17349
Got 17349 stars (including 16775 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=148 n_q2=200 n_q3=214 n_q4=375 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits -region wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-19-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_And-06-Q1b1x1_042110_TTUQ1b1x1_2452637_OM8DDBlJ/wcs_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:17:18.73 +41:55:27.1: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 01:52:32.90 +40:01:11.7: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:09:44.96 +42:00:25.2: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:12:36.08 +40:15:11.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 01:52:32.90 +40:01:11.7: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:17:18.73 +41:55:27.1: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:32.90 +40:01:11.7: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1542 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:09:44.96 +42:00:25.2: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:17:18.73 +41:55:27.1: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7236 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:44.96 +42:00:25.2: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7729 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:09:43.84 +41:59:47.5: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:12:36.08 +40:15:11.6: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:36.08 +40:15:11.6: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2437 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:09:43.84 +41:59:47.5: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:43.84 +41:59:47.5: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4819 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:19:21.62 +39:02:22.2: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:09:24.71 +39:32:16.2: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:25:38.01 +39:28:41.1: 13.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:09:24.71 +39:32:16.2: 13.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:19:21.62 +39:02:22.2: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:26:49.02 +39:51:53.0: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:24.71 +39:32:16.2: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3357 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:19:21.62 +39:02:22.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5511 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:25:38.01 +39:28:41.1: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:25:38.01 +39:28:41.1: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3628 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:26:49.02 +39:51:53.0: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:49.02 +39:51:53.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2824 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-29-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 02:25:52.60 +39:07:51.3: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-54-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 02:25:52.60 +39:07:51.3: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:25:52.60 +39:07:51.3: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4877 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46779.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50868.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52972.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132488_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132488_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132491_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132491_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132496_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132496_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132513_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132513_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132515_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132515_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132523_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132523_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132531_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132531_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132533_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132533_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132536_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132536_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132546_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132546_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132550_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132550_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132555_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132555_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132561_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132561_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:44.04 +39:01:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132583_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132583_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132590_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132590_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132600_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132600_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132601_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132601_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:48:45.72 +37:55:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132602_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132602_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132606_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132606_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132614_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132614_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132616_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132616_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132631_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132631_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132634_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 132634_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52972_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
Preparing report for the candidate 52972_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48046_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 48046_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79672_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 79672_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76335_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 76335_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:10.16 +36:51:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46779_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
Preparing report for the candidate 46779_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49425_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 49425_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:24:48.03 +39:15:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89564_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 89564_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:11.45 +34:37:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41826_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 41826_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52765_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 52765_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:08.71 +39:01:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31993_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 31993_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87651_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 87651_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:02.27 +34:15:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35091_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 35091_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:51.17 +40:37:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50868_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
Preparing report for the candidate 50868_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91020_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 91020_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:15.92 +33:57:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33569_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 33569_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:05:54.58 +40:43:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65976_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 65976_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:08:29.69 +37:51:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92204_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 92204_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:33.01 +34:59:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107237_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 107237_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:05.55 +34:13:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96605_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 96605_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:18.80 +33:50:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81807_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298
The candidate 81807_fd_And-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_04-20-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0298 did not pass the final checks