This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.2308 2461219.7308 13.04 18:04:31.95 +10:34:33.1
37.22461 15.15888 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J180432.03+103434.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.880 V 13.390 V 2457443.10000 312.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:04:31.95 +10:34:33.1: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:04:31.95 +10:34:33.1: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J180432.03+103434.2,2461219.7308,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J180432.03+103434.2 20260628.2308 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.2308 2461219.7308 13.51 17:47:43.03 +13:17:07.2
37.98294 20.03045 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V2027 Oph
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.000 pg 17.500 pg 119.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:47:43.03 +13:17:07.2: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:47:43.03 +13:17:07.2: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2027 Oph,2461219.7308,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2027 Oph 20260628.2308 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.2308 2461219.7308 12.55 17:45:43.66 +11:19:53.8
35.87985 19.65647 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0869 Oph
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V 13.400 V 2454375.51000 0.490975000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:45:43.66 +11:19:53.8: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:45:43.66 +11:19:53.8: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0869 Oph,2461219.7308,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0869 Oph 20260628.2308 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.88518628 12.05.2026 09:14:30.095 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
First image: 2461172.88518628 12.05.2026 09:14:30.095 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Last image: 2461219.73120230 28.06.2026 05:32:45.879 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20623
Objects passed selection criteria: 20568
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16149
Average stars matched: 15654.5 (96.9379 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125080 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 28 02:55:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.88518628 12.05.2026 09:14:30.095 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
First image: 2461172.88518628 12.05.2026 09:14:30.095 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Last image: 2461219.73120230 28.06.2026 05:32:45.879 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 92
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 79 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 133582
Objects passed selection criteria: 133286
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 105471
Average stars matched: 101641 (96.3687 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1964604 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 28 03:01:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461219.73043816
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits'
wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.273 +14:00:03.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:43.582 +13:58:04.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:39.273 +14:00:03.96
Second-epoch image center 17:46:43.582 +13:58:04.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:46.429 +13:57:31.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:39.273 +14:00:03.96
Second-epoch image center 17:46:46.429 +13:57:31.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0512 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:43.582 +13:58:04.18
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:46.429 +13:57:31.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01460 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H2j10uR2RR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PsPgswAT9C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oYLF2h0efe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oIq6Aqn82O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits and wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits and wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits and wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21956 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.4118 to 274.9076 deg, Dec +8.6597 to +19.2661 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.4118 to 274.9076 deg, Dec 8.6597 to 19.2661 deg
Loaded 11759 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9305 out of 10084 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10084 out of 21956 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.800700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.800700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21956 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.4118 to 274.9076 deg, Dec +8.6597 to +19.2661 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.4118 to 274.9076 deg, Dec 8.6597 to 19.2661 deg
Loaded 11759 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9305 out of 10084 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10084 out of 21956 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 21939 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.4210 to 274.9319 deg, Dec +8.6813 to +19.2684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.4210 to 274.9319 deg, Dec 8.6813 to 19.2684 deg
Loaded 11756 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9366 out of 10096 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10096 out of 21939 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
2.2 pix Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
3.5 pix fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
3.5 pix fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
15.2 mag. Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.H2j10uR2RR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1730, bad_region=0, passed=21956
Got 21956 stars (including 20203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21956 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.732 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.664 n_q1=191 n_q2=290 n_q3=197 n_q4=282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits -region wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PsPgswAT9C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1621, bad_region=0, passed=21939
Got 21939 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21939 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.839 n_q1=266 n_q2=244 n_q3=228 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.434
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oYLF2h0efe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=553, bad_region=0, passed=10501
Got 10501 stars (including 9942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10501 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=214 n_q2=250 n_q3=213 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oIq6Aqn82O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=0, passed=10578
Got 10578 stars (including 10041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=213 n_q2=250 n_q3=214 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.608 worst_q_ratio=1.204
ref2=Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits sigma_overall=0.585 worst_q_ratio=1.434
new1=fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.264
new2=fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.354
reference average sigma_overall=0.5965 worst_q_ratio=1.319
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31845_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 31845_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:31.51 +18:43:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31859_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 31859_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:27.39 +09:17:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06450_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 06450_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:03.84 +11:30:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12956_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 12956_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:06.76 +14:44:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30304_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 30304_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:57.04 +14:11:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01600_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 01600_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:52.62 +09:25:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04670_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 04670_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:14.39 +10:45:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08343_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 08343_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:49.48 +12:23:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19421_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 19421_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:22.96 +17:54:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.273 +14:00:03.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:43.582 +13:58:04.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:39.273 +14:00:03.96
Second-epoch image center 17:46:43.582 +13:58:04.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:46.429 +13:57:31.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:39.273 +14:00:03.96
Second-epoch image center 17:46:46.429 +13:57:31.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0512 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:43.582 +13:58:04.18
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:46.429 +13:57:31.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01460 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bjeMXJCm3t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HO6dm1TjpC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m8EJUHizyT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HA0ahcED4O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits and wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits and wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits and wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151239 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.4036 to 274.9124 deg, Dec +8.6491 to +19.2668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.4036 to 274.9124 deg, Dec 8.6491 to 19.2668 deg
Loaded 11779 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7778 out of 10209 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10209 out of 151239 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.669900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.669900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151239 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.4036 to 274.9124 deg, Dec +8.6491 to +19.2668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.4036 to 274.9124 deg, Dec 8.6491 to 19.2668 deg
Loaded 11779 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7778 out of 10209 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10209 out of 151239 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 145141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.4153 to 274.9351 deg, Dec +8.6763 to +19.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.4153 to 274.9351 deg, Dec 8.6763 to 19.2698 deg
Loaded 11767 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7960 out of 10220 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10220 out of 145141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
2.1 pix Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
3.2 pix fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
3.2 pix fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
15.4 mag. Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bjeMXJCm3t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=16109, bad_region=1, passed=151175
Got 151175 stars (including 134881 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151175 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.613 n_q1=202 n_q2=289 n_q3=189 n_q4=282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits -region wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HO6dm1TjpC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=15273, bad_region=1, passed=145111
Got 145111 stars (including 129643 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.787 n_q1=262 n_q2=230 n_q3=237 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.465
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m8EJUHizyT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3423, bad_region=26, passed=63969
Got 63969 stars (including 60442 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=210 n_q2=244 n_q3=222 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HA0ahcED4O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3409, bad_region=22, passed=64485
Got 64485 stars (including 60979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64485 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=211 n_q2=250 n_q3=220 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0170.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_004924_TTUQ1b1x1_3824319_qYCmFNve/wcs_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:57:32.06 +11:32:56.9: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:15:44.46 +09:12:14.4: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:16:57.13 +10:09:21.4: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:14:55.91 +13:14:02.5: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:48:42.18 +16:35:45.8: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:18:16.01 +17:25:07.6: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:15:57.97 +09:04:22.1: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:06:46.09 +08:52:43.7: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:48:42.18 +16:35:45.8: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:18:16.01 +17:25:07.6: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:42.18 +16:35:45.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6351 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:15:44.46 +09:12:14.4: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:57:32.06 +11:32:56.9: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:18:16.01 +17:25:07.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5539 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:16:57.13 +10:09:21.4: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:14:55.91 +13:14:02.5: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:15:57.97 +09:04:22.1: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:44.46 +09:12:14.4: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1064 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:57:32.06 +11:32:56.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9454 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:57.13 +10:09:21.4: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3813 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:55.91 +13:14:02.5: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0612 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:57.97 +09:04:22.1: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0957 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:22:26.21 +15:09:13.6: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:06:46.09 +08:52:43.7: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:46.09 +08:52:43.7: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4210 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:19:01.93 +17:31:46.5: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:22:26.21 +15:09:13.6: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:26.21 +15:09:13.6: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5917 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:32:13.23 +18:22:47.6: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:07:45.30 +09:49:55.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:35:18.53 +19:05:56.0: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:19:01.93 +17:31:46.5: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:01.93 +17:31:46.5: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7200 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:07:42.09 +09:51:20.1: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:02:54.94 +15:01:31.2: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:32:13.23 +18:22:47.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:32:13.23 +18:22:47.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8742 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:07:45.30 +09:49:55.9: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:35:18.53 +19:05:56.0: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:45.30 +09:49:55.9: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5901 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:18.53 +19:05:56.0: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8738 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:38:22.54 +17:51:08.9: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:17:25.94 +13:19:46.7: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:07:42.09 +09:51:20.1: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:42.09 +09:51:20.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8964 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:02:54.94 +15:01:31.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:02:54.94 +15:01:31.2: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0000 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:57:08.45 +13:58:08.5: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:38:22.54 +17:51:08.9: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:17:25.94 +13:19:46.7: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:22.54 +17:51:08.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2019 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:17:25.94 +13:19:46.7: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0041 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:08:41.00 +11:24:20.7: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:35:27.89 +11:21:03.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:14:51.14 +15:31:53.3: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:57:08.45 +13:58:08.5: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:57:08.45 +13:58:08.5: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2433 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:22:55.81 +16:27:08.7: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:13:49.83 +16:24:26.5: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:08:41.00 +11:24:20.7: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:12:26.78 +18:01:45.6: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:35:27.89 +11:21:03.6: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:41.00 +11:24:20.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2199 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:27.89 +11:21:03.6: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1402 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:14:51.14 +15:31:53.3: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:51.14 +15:31:53.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2901 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:22:55.81 +16:27:08.7: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:55.81 +16:27:08.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2384 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:13:49.83 +16:24:26.5: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:12:26.78 +18:01:45.6: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:49.83 +16:24:26.5: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3564 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:26.78 +18:01:45.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4202 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:41:48.11 +15:26:11.4: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:38:49.74 +15:48:56.6: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:00:46.94 +17:35:26.5: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:07:25.00 +15:15:29.6: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:02:44.81 +16:47:44.6: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:10:39.66 +12:41:35.4: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:41:48.11 +15:26:11.4: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:48.11 +15:26:11.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3396 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:38:49.74 +15:48:56.6: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:07:25.00 +15:15:29.6: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:49.74 +15:48:56.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3819 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:00:46.94 +17:35:26.5: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:25.00 +15:15:29.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3071 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:46.94 +17:35:26.5: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4018 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:16:13.28 +14:00:03.2: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:01:53.67 +13:29:13.7: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:02:44.81 +16:47:44.6: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:02:44.81 +16:47:44.6: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3559 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:10:39.66 +12:41:35.4: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:39.66 +12:41:35.4: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3334 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:23:43.69 +13:24:13.5: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:05:48.34 +13:29:03.4: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:16:13.28 +14:00:03.2: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:13.28 +14:00:03.2: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2984 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:01:53.67 +13:29:13.7: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:53.67 +13:29:13.7: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4062 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:54:07.85 +16:55:38.0: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:23:43.69 +13:24:13.5: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:43.69 +13:24:13.5: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4215 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:03:00.94 +12:37:29.1: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:01:41.47 +16:42:02.0: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:05:48.34 +13:29:03.4: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:48.34 +13:29:03.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4654 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:54:07.85 +16:55:38.0: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:07.85 +16:55:38.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5281 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:03:00.94 +12:37:29.1: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:00.94 +12:37:29.1: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4141 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:01:41.47 +16:42:02.0: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:41.47 +16:42:02.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6010 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:05:25.85 +13:20:31.3: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 18:04:31.95 +10:34:33.1: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:47:43.03 +13:17:07.2: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:05:25.85 +13:20:31.3: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:25.85 +13:20:31.3: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3677 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-14-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits at 17:45:43.66 +11:19:53.8: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 18:04:31.95 +10:34:33.1: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:04:31.95 +10:34:33.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0449 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:47:43.03 +13:17:07.2: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:47:43.03 +13:17:07.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4952 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-15-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits at 17:45:43.66 +11:19:53.8: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:45:43.66 +11:19:53.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5493 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25240.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66083.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174055_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174055_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:12.73 +12:56:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174056_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174056_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174057_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174057_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174060_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174060_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174061_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174061_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:18.95 +09:38:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174063_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174063_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174066_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174066_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174075_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174075_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174077_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174077_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174364_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174364_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:25.64 +13:17:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174465_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174465_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:57.66 +17:56:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174688_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174688_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:58.09 +12:02:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174751_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174751_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174770_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174770_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:06.92 +15:09:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174808_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174808_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174838_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174838_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174861_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174861_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174870_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174870_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:47.88 +10:56:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174876_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174876_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:15.59 +14:25:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174879_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174879_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174940_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174940_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174952_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174952_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:55.10 +17:56:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174990_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 174990_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:52.59 +18:29:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175031_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175031_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:04.02 +13:45:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175033_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175033_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175046_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175046_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:00.81 +11:26:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175054_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175054_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175056_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175056_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:37.55 +16:22:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175216_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175216_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:56.01 +09:26:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175225_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175225_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175268_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175268_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:02.68 +17:32:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175310_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175310_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175315_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175315_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175317_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175317_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:03.57 +17:32:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175325_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175325_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:06.00 +14:01:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175342_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175342_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175362_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175362_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175373_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175373_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:45.21 +16:20:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175378_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175378_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:03.84 +16:46:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175384_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175384_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175385_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175385_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175414_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175414_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175418_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175418_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175459_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175459_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:14.43 +10:13:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175470_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175470_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:35.65 +18:06:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175472_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175472_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:13.09 +17:42:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175476_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175476_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175478_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175478_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175480_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175480_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175483_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175483_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175489_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175491_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175501_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175501_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:46.37 +18:14:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175533_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175533_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175561_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175561_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175563_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175563_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:37.88 +11:58:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175572_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175572_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175598_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175598_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175599_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175599_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175604_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175604_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175686_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 175686_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40229_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 40229_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:03.83 +11:30:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02938_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 02938_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:16.54 +08:56:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72680_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 72680_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:40.32 +13:36:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61043_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 61043_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:19.70 +12:54:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07121_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 07121_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:27.37 +09:17:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08599_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 08599_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:52.62 +09:25:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07983_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 07983_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:46.56 +09:21:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26391_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 26391_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:14.39 +10:45:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132674_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 132674_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:55.03 +16:38:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67470_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 67470_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23932_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 23932_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:50.69 +10:23:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25240_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 25240_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114301_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 114301_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:22.99 +17:54:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59442_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 59442_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:07.06 +12:50:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66083_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 66083_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36297_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 36297_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162002_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 162002_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:42.03 +09:29:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88454_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 88454_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:06.75 +14:44:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106934_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 106934_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:31.50 +18:43:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26013_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 26013_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:54.76 +10:35:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31325_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 31325_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:51.14 +10:57:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81360_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 81360_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:57.04 +14:11:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53422_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171
The candidate 53422_fd_Oph-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-32-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0171 did not pass the final checks