This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.1619 2461219.6619 14.12 15:08:49.53 +19:16:15.7
26.32868 57.57839 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.6" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 15:08:49.53 +19:16:15.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:08:49.53 +19:16:15.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 15:08:49.53 +19:16:15.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461219.6619,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260628.1619 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.1619 2461219.6619 14.47 14:28:26.71 +26:09:51.9
35.92815 68.33593 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.8" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 14:28:26.71 +26:09:51.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 14:28:26.71 +26:09:51.9: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 14:28:26.71 +26:09:51.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461219.6619,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260628.1619 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.1619 2461219.6619 14.45 14:48:49.95 +17:46:37.1
20.04776 61.39460 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.6" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 14:48:49.95 +17:46:37.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 14:48:49.95 +17:46:37.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 14:48:49.95 +17:46:37.1: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461219.6619,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260628.1619 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.1619 2461219.6619 14.48 14:30:20.49 +25:02:28.0
33.15206 67.73047 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 14:30:20.49 +25:02:28.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 14:30:20.49 +25:02:28.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 14:30:20.49 +25:02:28.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461219.6619,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260628.1619 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.81834368 12.05.2026 07:38:14.894 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
First image: 2461172.81834368 12.05.2026 07:38:14.894 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Last image: 2461219.66211840 28.06.2026 03:53:17.030 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4943
Objects passed selection criteria: 4930
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3846
Average stars matched: 3755.5 (97.6469 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111640 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 27 22:57:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.81834368 12.05.2026 07:38:14.894 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
First image: 2461172.81834368 12.05.2026 07:38:14.894 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Last image: 2461219.66211840 28.06.2026 03:53:17.030 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 241
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29390
Objects passed selection criteria: 29322
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23999
Average stars matched: 23195 (96.6499 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134644 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 27 22:58:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461219.66169638
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:46:00.692 +22:00:19.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:46:09.727 +22:00:30.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:46:00.692 +22:00:19.78
Second-epoch image center 14:46:09.727 +22:00:30.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0350 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:46:10.049 +22:00:40.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:46:00.692 +22:00:19.78
Second-epoch image center 14:46:10.049 +22:00:40.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0366 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:46:09.727 +22:00:30.25
Second-epoch second image center 14:46:10.049 +22:00:40.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00307 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2uNMQoxGLR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.01QZrfCqTG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gg0NNKDZIO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.STIixmhAfP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits and wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits and wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits and wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.9734 to 230.5645 deg, Dec +16.1049 to +27.5058 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.9734 to 230.5645 deg, Dec 16.1049 to 27.5058 deg
Loaded 4754 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3513 out of 3661 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3661 out of 6537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.827000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.827000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.9734 to 230.5645 deg, Dec +16.1049 to +27.5058 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.9734 to 230.5645 deg, Dec 16.1049 to 27.5058 deg
Loaded 4754 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3513 out of 3661 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3661 out of 6537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 6562 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.9733 to 230.5647 deg, Dec +16.1804 to +27.5059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.9733 to 230.5647 deg, Dec 16.1804 to 27.5059 deg
Loaded 4728 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3504 out of 3660 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3660 out of 6562 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
2.1 pix Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
2.2 pix fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.2 pix fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
15.4 mag. Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2uNMQoxGLR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=408, bad_region=1354, passed=6537
Got 6537 stars (including 4872 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=313 n_q2=151 n_q3=323 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.756
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.01QZrfCqTG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=415, bad_region=1377, passed=6562
Got 6562 stars (including 4872 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=311 n_q2=149 n_q3=325 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.686
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Gg0NNKDZIO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=252, bad_region=801, passed=3374
Got 3374 stars (including 2375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=300 n_q2=153 n_q3=316 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.STIixmhAfP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=249, bad_region=808, passed=3327
Got 3327 stars (including 2327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3327 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=301 n_q2=157 n_q3=316 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.756
ref2=Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.686
new1=fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.307
new2=fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.216
reference average sigma_overall=0.3835 worst_q_ratio=1.721
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:46:00.692 +22:00:19.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:46:09.727 +22:00:30.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:46:00.692 +22:00:19.78
Second-epoch image center 14:46:09.727 +22:00:30.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0350 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:46:10.049 +22:00:40.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:46:00.692 +22:00:19.78
Second-epoch image center 14:46:10.049 +22:00:40.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0366 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:46:09.727 +22:00:30.25
Second-epoch second image center 14:46:10.049 +22:00:40.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00307 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yGV8y2pRYq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pvh73jclOJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7n7YSPsd4y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xVlT8kxi11
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits and wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits and wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits and wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 38174 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.9608 to 230.5939 deg, Dec +16.1049 to +27.5187 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.9608 to 230.5939 deg, Dec 16.1049 to 27.5187 deg
Loaded 4784 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3339 out of 3682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3682 out of 38174 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.701200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.701200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 38174 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.9608 to 230.5939 deg, Dec +16.1049 to +27.5187 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.9608 to 230.5939 deg, Dec 16.1049 to 27.5187 deg
Loaded 4784 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3339 out of 3682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3682 out of 38174 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 38210 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.9603 to 230.5935 deg, Dec +16.1147 to +27.5285 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.9603 to 230.5935 deg, Dec 16.1147 to 27.5285 deg
Loaded 4786 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3326 out of 3680 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3680 out of 38210 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 151 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
2.0 pix Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
2.1 pix fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
15.6 mag. Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yGV8y2pRYq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1494, bad_region=6811, passed=38158
Got 38158 stars (including 30106 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=322 n_q2=152 n_q3=313 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.672
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pvh73jclOJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=1540, bad_region=6817, passed=38180
Got 38180 stars (including 30083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=324 n_q2=150 n_q3=314 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.658
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7n7YSPsd4y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=633, bad_region=3149, passed=20061
Got 20061 stars (including 16451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20061 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=305 n_q2=152 n_q3=310 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xVlT8kxi11 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=657, bad_region=3161, passed=20101
Got 20101 stars (including 16491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20101 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=304 n_q2=151 n_q3=317 n_q4=185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-52-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-27_CI_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_225511_TTUQ2b1x1_2574830_dWHWIkwa/wcs_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:09:31.92 +23:36:46.7: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 15:09:31.92 +23:36:46.7: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:02:19.37 +24:59:13.4: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:31.92 +23:36:46.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6497 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:14:39.69 +21:20:07.7: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 15:02:19.37 +24:59:13.4: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 14:32:00.65 +18:50:29.6: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:19.37 +24:59:13.4: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1454 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 14:32:00.65 +18:50:29.6: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 15:14:39.69 +21:20:07.7: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:00.65 +18:50:29.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6473 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:39.69 +21:20:07.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4198 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 14:53:28.03 +19:44:02.6: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 14:53:28.03 +19:44:02.6: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:28.03 +19:44:02.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8607 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:08:49.53 +19:16:15.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 14:28:26.71 +26:09:51.9: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 14:48:49.95 +17:46:37.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 15:08:49.53 +19:16:15.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 14:28:26.71 +26:09:51.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 14:30:20.49 +25:02:28.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 14:48:49.95 +17:46:37.1: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0266.fits at 14:30:20.49 +25:02:28.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53020.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53048.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53101.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52443_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52444_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52444_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52466_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52466_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52474_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52474_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52479_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52510_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52510_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52513_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52513_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:55.37 +18:12:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52542_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52542_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52555_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52555_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:38:07.85 +18:16:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52565_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52565_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52570_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52574_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52574_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:02:16.60 +24:59:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52576_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52597_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:10.82 +18:57:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52613_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52613_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52614_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52614_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52623_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52623_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:52:24.19 +23:49:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52625_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52628_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52630_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52647_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:42:16.35 +21:18:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52661_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52661_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52662_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52670_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52673_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52677_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52677_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52678_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52678_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52680_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52685_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52694_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52696_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52704_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52708_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52708_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52710_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52715_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52722_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52723_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52734_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52734_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52740_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52740_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52742_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52743_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52747_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52751_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52754_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52754_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52757_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52758_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52758_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52770_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52775_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52775_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52777_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52783_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52786_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52789_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52804_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52810_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52811_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:46.20 +25:29:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52813_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52813_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52817_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52824_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52832_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52833_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52837_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52837_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52840_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52840_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52842_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52846_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52846_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52847_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52847_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52854_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52854_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52857_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52857_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52871_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52871_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:09.22 +22:56:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52872_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52872_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52873_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52875_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52878_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52883_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52883_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52892_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52896_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52897_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52897_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52898_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52899_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52903_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52903_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52906_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52907_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52908_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52908_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52921_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52921_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52924_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52926_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52926_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52934_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52936_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52937_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52937_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52943_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52943_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52945_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52945_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52946_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52949_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52950_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52950_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52952_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52953_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52953_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52960_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52960_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52963_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52971_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52971_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52978_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52979_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52979_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52982_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52982_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52986_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52986_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52987_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52987_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52990_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52990_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52992_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52997_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52998_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52999_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 52999_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53000_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53001_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53001_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53003_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53003_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53006_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53006_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53014_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53014_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53019_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53019_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 53020_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53021_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53021_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53023_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53023_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53031_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53039_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53040_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53041_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53044_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53047_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53047_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53048_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 53048_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53049_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53051_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 53051_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53054_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53054_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53056_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53056_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53059_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53059_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53060_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53061_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53061_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53062_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53064_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53074_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53081_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53081_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53085_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53091_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53091_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53099_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53099_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53100_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 53101_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53103_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53103_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53107_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53107_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53111_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53111_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53113_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53116_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53116_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53118_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53118_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53120_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53120_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53123_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53123_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53129_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53129_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53135_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53135_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 53136_fd_Boo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-27_22-53-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks