This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 9.67 17:22:04.22 -23:24:48.6
1.79737 7.42715 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.2 pix
The object was found in VSX20" Gaia DR3 4111582779606394112
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
20.200 G 20.630 G 0.743950000000
The object was found in astcheck.14 Irene 0 -1 1 9.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:22:04.22 -23:24:48.6: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:22:04.22 -23:24:48.6: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4111582779606394112,2461218.6359,9.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4111582779606394112 20260627.1359 9.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 10.77 17:47:01.62 -26:58:59.9
1.82992 0.74953 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" [HHR2012] J174702.2-265903
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.870 r Y 0.250 r
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:47:01.62 -26:58:59.9: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:47:01.62 -26:58:59.9: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[HHR2012] J174702.2-265903,2461218.6359,10.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[HHR2012] J174702.2-265903 20260627.1359 10.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 11.69 17:30:14.99 -28:31:48.9
358.53985 3.06375 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" Gaia DR3 4059636009163524864
Type:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.460 G 17.670 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:30:14.99 -28:31:48.9: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:30:14.99 -28:31:48.9: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4059636009163524864,2461218.6359,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4059636009163524864 20260627.1359 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 11.19 17:03:03.40 -27:53:31.3
355.60892 8.33505 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J170303-2753.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.876 Ic Y 0.316 Ic 2453348.20000 284.900000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:03:03.40 -27:53:31.3: 12.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:03:03.40 -27:53:31.3: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J170303-2753.5,2461218.6359,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J170303-2753.5 20260627.1359 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 11.76 17:08:51.06 -28:28:06.9
355.90606 6.96535 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0358 Oph
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.470 V Y 1.400 V 2452492.80000 107.000000000000 :
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:08:51.06 -28:28:06.9: 12.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:08:51.06 -28:28:06.9: 12.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0358 Oph,2461218.6359,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0358 Oph 20260627.1359 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 11.87 16:59:54.92 -27:47:16.5
355.27024 8.95227 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 2.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J165954.77-274716.8
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.770 V 13.340 V
The object was found in astcheck.1757 Porvoo 74 53 91 16.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 16:59:54.92 -27:47:16.5: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 16:59:54.92 -27:47:16.5: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J165954.77-274716.8,2461218.6359,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J165954.77-274716.8 20260627.1359 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 10.55 17:24:28.22 -29:02:42.5
357.40728 3.83220 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0971 Oph
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.890 V Y 0.380 V 2452331.20000 157.331650000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:24:28.22 -29:02:42.5: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:24:28.22 -29:02:42.5: 11.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0971 Oph,2461218.6359,10.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0971 Oph 20260627.1359 10.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 10.52 17:36:14.59 -22:27:22.6
4.39476 5.21367 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J173615-2227.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.302 V Y 1.624 V 2451943.18000 78.620140000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:36:14.59 -22:27:22.6: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:36:14.59 -22:27:22.6: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J173615-2227.4,2461218.6359,10.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J173615-2227.4 20260627.1359 10.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 11.51 17:01:39.50 -30:16:17.2
353.50611 7.14613 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J170139.29-301617.6
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.190 V 13.530 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:01:39.50 -30:16:17.2: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:01:39.50 -30:16:17.2: 12.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J170139.29-301617.6,2461218.6359,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J170139.29-301617.6 20260627.1359 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 10.43 17:04:34.55 -25:33:39.1
357.70889 9.45086 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J170435-2533.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.138 Ic Y 0.297 Ic 2452986.90000 239.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:04:34.55 -25:33:39.1: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:04:34.55 -25:33:39.1: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J170435-2533.6,2461218.6359,10.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J170435-2533.6 20260627.1359 10.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 27.1359 2461218.6359 10.14 17:26:46.92 -28:50:02.3
357.86556 3.53017 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J172647-2850.0
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.530 V Y 0.430 V 2452299.20000 146.886017000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:26:46.92 -28:50:02.3: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:26:46.92 -28:50:02.3: 11.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J172647-2850.0,2461218.6359,10.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J172647-2850.0 20260627.1359 10.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461170.88387507 10.05.2026 09:12:36.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
First image: 2461170.88387507 10.05.2026 09:12:36.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Last image: 2461218.63615984 27.06.2026 03:15:54.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10415
Objects passed selection criteria: 10362
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6476.25
Average stars matched: 6291 (97.1395 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116192 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 26 22:24:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461170.88387507 10.05.2026 09:12:36.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
First image: 2461170.88387507 10.05.2026 09:12:36.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Last image: 2461218.63615984 27.06.2026 03:15:54.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 100640
Objects passed selection criteria: 100420
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 64419.2
Average stars matched: 60956.8 (94.6251 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1935872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 26 22:29:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461218.63568630
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:49.063 -25:59:50.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:49.309 -26:00:03.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:49.063 -25:59:50.02
Second-epoch image center 17:16:49.309 -26:00:03.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0037 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:50.233 -26:00:02.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:49.063 -25:59:50.02
Second-epoch image center 17:16:50.233 -26:00:02.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0056 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:49.309 -26:00:03.07
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:50.233 -26:00:02.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00346 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EpGlJWanUq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AlvUlx9ASJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0MyWbIezCf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rhJq5ERY2d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11194 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1803 to 268.2892 deg, Dec -31.2582 to -20.5395 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1803 to 268.2892 deg, Dec -31.2582 to -20.5395 deg
Loaded 11239 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7265 out of 7531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7531 out of 11194 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.645400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.645400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11194 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1803 to 268.2892 deg, Dec -31.2582 to -20.5395 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1803 to 268.2892 deg, Dec -31.2582 to -20.5395 deg
Loaded 11239 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7265 out of 7531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7531 out of 11194 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 11115 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1802 to 268.2891 deg, Dec -31.2508 to -20.5384 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1802 to 268.2891 deg, Dec -31.2508 to -20.5384 deg
Loaded 11227 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7232 out of 7509 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7509 out of 11115 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
4.2 pix fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
4.2 pix fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
14.3 mag. Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.4 (SNR ) 10.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EpGlJWanUq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=730, bad_region=0, passed=11194
Got 11194 stars (including 10451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11194 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.632 n_q1=177 n_q2=204 n_q3=241 n_q4=305 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.042
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AlvUlx9ASJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=729, bad_region=0, passed=11115
Got 11115 stars (including 10374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11115 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.698 n_q1=176 n_q2=212 n_q3=236 n_q4=309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0MyWbIezCf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=0, passed=1901
Got 1901 stars (including 1666 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1901 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 291 to 351 (Dec -31.7 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 291 to 350 (Dec -31.7 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.690 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.869 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=305 n_q2=165 n_q3=248 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.633
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rhJq5ERY2d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=0, passed=1964
Got 1964 stars (including 1731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1964 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.797 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=298 n_q2=170 n_q3=239 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits sigma_overall=0.607 worst_q_ratio=1.042
ref2=Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits sigma_overall=0.617 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new1=fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.532 worst_q_ratio=1.633
new2=fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.541 worst_q_ratio=1.472
reference average sigma_overall=0.612 worst_q_ratio=1.0865
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050_astrometric_residuals.png (927 matched stars from wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (908 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:22:04.22 -23:24:48.6: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:22:04.22 -23:24:48.6: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20687.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20687_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 20687_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04973_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 04973_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:35.15 -26:50:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05703_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05703_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.38 -27:23:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:22:04.22 -23:24:48.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:49.063 -25:59:50.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:49.309 -26:00:03.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:49.063 -25:59:50.02
Second-epoch image center 17:16:49.309 -26:00:03.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0037 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:50.233 -26:00:02.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:49.063 -25:59:50.02
Second-epoch image center 17:16:50.233 -26:00:02.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0056 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:49.309 -26:00:03.07
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:50.233 -26:00:02.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00346 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MMRIDafaaL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Al8dq3rjwn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dcCJtUJRKy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dt0dLTdpPx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 112804 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1066 to 268.3136 deg, Dec -31.2641 to -20.5395 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1066 to 268.3136 deg, Dec -31.2641 to -20.5395 deg
Loaded 11295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8178 out of 9646 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9646 out of 112804 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.446400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.446400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 112804 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1066 to 268.3136 deg, Dec -31.2641 to -20.5395 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1066 to 268.3136 deg, Dec -31.2641 to -20.5395 deg
Loaded 11295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8178 out of 9646 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9646 out of 112804 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 114045 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0999 to 268.3092 deg, Dec -31.2510 to -20.5324 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0999 to 268.3092 deg, Dec -31.2510 to -20.5324 deg
Loaded 11282 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8134 out of 9632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9632 out of 114045 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 94 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.3 pix Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
3.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
3.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MMRIDafaaL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=9107, bad_region=0, passed=112796
Got 112796 stars (including 103534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 112796 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.629 n_q1=182 n_q2=214 n_q3=239 n_q4=300 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Al8dq3rjwn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=9199, bad_region=0, passed=114037
Got 114037 stars (including 104654 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 114037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 111664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 111664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 111664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.656 n_q1=188 n_q2=212 n_q3=241 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dcCJtUJRKy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=724, bad_region=1, passed=16361
Got 16361 stars (including 15619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.685 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=274 n_q2=147 n_q3=274 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Dt0dLTdpPx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=694, bad_region=0, passed=16892
Got 16892 stars (including 16184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16892 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.750 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.496 n_q1=270 n_q2=161 n_q3=269 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.505
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-26_CI_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_221731_TTUQ1b1x1_3199040_x5Nx6Kz3/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:50:00.50 -28:47:06.5: 9.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:47:01.62 -26:58:59.9: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:48:56.02 -28:53:52.0: 9.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:48:35.17 -28:53:31.7: 10.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:50:20.79 -28:22:01.1: 11.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:34:12.12 -30:52:38.5: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:34:00.48 -31:10:43.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:51:08.91 -24:00:52.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:48:35.17 -28:53:31.7: 10.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:50:20.79 -28:22:01.1: 11.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:48:56.02 -28:53:52.0: 9.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:50:00.50 -28:47:06.5: 9.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:47:01.62 -26:58:59.9: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:34:12.12 -30:52:38.5: 10.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.26 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.04 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:35.17 -28:53:31.7: ref_mag=10.26 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2630 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:20.79 -28:22:01.1: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7485 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:00.50 -28:47:06.5: ref_mag=9.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5295 delta=-1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:56.02 -28:53:52.0: ref_mag=9.04 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7476 delta=-0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:47:01.62 -26:58:59.9: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.7642 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:12.12 -30:52:38.5: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7157 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:42:23.49 -30:01:25.7: 10.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:34:00.48 -31:10:43.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:00.48 -31:10:43.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:51:08.91 -24:00:52.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:08.91 -24:00:52.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:42:23.49 -30:01:25.7: 10.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:23.49 -30:01:25.7: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3189 delta=-0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:30:14.99 -28:31:48.9: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:03:03.40 -27:53:31.3: 12.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:30:14.99 -28:31:48.9: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:30:14.99 -28:31:48.9: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.6795 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:03:03.40 -27:53:31.3: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:03:03.40 -27:53:31.3: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1879 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:08:51.06 -28:28:06.9: 12.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:08:51.06 -28:28:06.9: 12.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:08:51.06 -28:28:06.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.7541 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 16:59:54.92 -27:47:16.5: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:24:28.22 -29:02:42.5: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 16:59:54.92 -27:47:16.5: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:59:54.92 -27:47:16.5: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8483 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:36:14.59 -22:27:22.6: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:24:28.22 -29:02:42.5: 11.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:24:28.22 -29:02:42.5: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5474 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:36:14.59 -22:27:22.6: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:36:14.59 -22:27:22.6: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5139 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:01:39.50 -30:16:17.2: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:01:39.50 -30:16:17.2: 12.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:01:39.50 -30:16:17.2: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5104 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:04:34.55 -25:33:39.1: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:04:34.55 -25:33:39.1: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:04:34.55 -25:33:39.1: ref_mag=11.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4190 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:26:46.92 -28:50:02.3: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:26:46.92 -28:50:02.3: 11.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:26:46.92 -28:50:02.3: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.1414 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103174.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103361.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107998.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108137.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135703.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14889.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74683.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86405.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out98640.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135700_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135700_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135703_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 135703_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135720_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135720_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:04.22 -23:24:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135747_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135747_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135769_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135769_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135795_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135795_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:58.09 -26:52:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135798_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135798_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135825_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135825_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135837_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135837_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135850_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135850_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135902_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135902_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135933_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135933_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:56.00 -26:02:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135953_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135953_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135961_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135961_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135966_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 135966_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136018_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136023_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136023_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:15.73 -22:01:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136063_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136063_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:10.47 -29:03:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136103_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136103_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:22.15 -21:35:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136131_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136131_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:38.05 -27:18:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136138_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136138_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136141_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136141_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:12.46 -25:22:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136144_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136144_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:50.03 -30:19:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136198_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136198_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:02.08 -26:20:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136224_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136224_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136265_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136265_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136280_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136280_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:01.19 -25:09:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136281_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136281_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:01.78 -28:25:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136285_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136285_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:17.29 -25:48:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136294_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136294_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136301_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136301_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136303_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 136303_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74753_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 74753_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:09.38 -28:46:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106113_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 106113_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:26.36 -28:09:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96694_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 96694_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:00.63 -29:17:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103174_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 103174_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23279_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 23279_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:40.78 -23:20:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45869_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 45869_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:02.78 -25:34:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21287_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21287_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:33.89 -23:00:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107998_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 107998_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27998_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 27998_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:00.53 -23:40:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95278_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 95278_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:43.84 -29:25:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81083_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 81083_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:11.71 -28:27:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54642_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 54642_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:08.58 -26:22:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108697_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 108697_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:29.38 -27:49:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70153_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 70153_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:24.66 -30:19:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103361_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 103361_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93742_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 93742_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:16.63 -29:35:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43006_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 43006_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:17.91 -25:09:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37073_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 37073_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:48.30 -24:43:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107564_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 107564_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:40.75 -28:01:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83098_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 83098_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:54.40 -27:19:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09434_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 09434_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.66 -21:44:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22810_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 22810_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:02.10 -23:08:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05834_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05834_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:09.41 -21:18:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105896_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 105896_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:23.69 -28:11:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11903_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 11903_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:43.67 -22:02:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58718_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 58718_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:26.90 -26:45:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21749_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21749_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:49.91 -23:11:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54452_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 54452_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:32.43 -26:22:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54816_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 54816_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:52.59 -26:23:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59094_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 59094_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:35.19 -26:50:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31547_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 31547_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:44.02 -24:10:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108137_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 108137_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98640_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 98640_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43073_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 43073_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:57.62 -25:21:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71069_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 71069_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:43.90 -30:10:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14889_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 14889_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37461_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 37461_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:27.65 -24:44:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103359_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 103359_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:05.80 -28:24:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92528_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 92528_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:50.51 -29:44:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107086_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 107086_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:18.68 -28:03:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44805_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 44805_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:10.37 -25:27:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110283_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 110283_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.37 -27:23:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86405_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 86405_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59624_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 59624_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:55.88 -26:46:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112326_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 112326_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:39.97 -27:26:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37782_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 37782_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:14.60 -24:46:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45518_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 45518_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44387_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 44387_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:56.68 -25:22:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27047_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 27047_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:51.64 -23:43:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93030_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 93030_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:57.77 -29:44:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58118_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 58118_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:46.93 -26:40:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31348_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 31348_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:50.16 -24:02:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40237_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 40237_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:34.56 -24:56:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02838_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 02838_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.15 -20:59:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39075_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 39075_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:00.95 -24:55:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106215_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 106215_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:40.59 -28:07:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46881_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 46881_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:02.92 -25:35:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91184_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 91184_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:08.30 -29:53:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16551_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 16551_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:21.83 -22:36:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103307_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 103307_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:48.80 -28:28:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74683_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 74683_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107996_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 107996_fd_Oph-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-26_22-15-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
